Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 97 references

Stochastic modeling of blob-like plasma filaments in the scrape-off layer: Time-dependent velocities and pulse stagnation

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that blob-like plasma filaments in the scrape-off layer can stagnate because their velocity tracks their decaying amplitude, and this stagnation reshapes the statistics of the plasma fluctuations.

desk verdict Stagnation is new and the α=1 exact results are clean, but the adiabatic velocity–amplitude closure (Eq. 39) is the unvalidated hinge. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04966 v1 pith:T5C7WR7H submitted 2024-12-06 physics.plasm-ph

O. Paikina , J. M. Losada , A. Theodorsen , O. E. Garcia This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph
keywords scrape-offlayerblobfilamentsstochasticpulsemodelstagnationtime-dependentvelocityradialwaitingtimeplasmaintermittencySOLfluctuations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the radial transport of blob-like plasma filaments in the scrape-off layer is fundamentally changed once the filament velocity is allowed to decay with its amplitude. In the model, each pulse moves with velocity proportional to a power of its instantaneous amplitude, which falls exponentially over a parallel transit time; the result is that pulses stall at a finite distance. The authors derive the exact distributions of pulse amplitudes, velocities, durations, and waiting times as functions of radius, plus closed-form cumulants for the linear case. If correct, this means measurements made farther from the plasma source see fewer, larger, faster pulses, so fluctuation levels increase outward even when the mean profile keeps the familiar exponential shape.

What carries the argument

The engine is the advection-dissipation equation for a one-sided exponential pulse moving with velocity $V(t)$, combined with the power-law relation $V(t)/\langle v_0\rangle = c_v (A(t)/\langle a_0\rangle)^\alpha$. Since $A(t) = a_0\exp(-t/\tau_\parallel)$, integrating the velocity yields $X(t) = X_{\max}[1-\exp(-\alpha t/\tau_\parallel)]$, which is the stagnation identity. From this identity the paper derives the transit-time relation, the amplitude and velocity distributions at each radius, the pulse-duration distribution, the waiting-time formula, and, for $\alpha = 1$, the explicit cumulants.

What would settle it

Track individual filaments in a turbulence simulation or with a fast probe array, and check whether each pulse's radial speed falls linearly to zero as $1 - x/X_{\max}$ with $X_{\max} = v_0\tau_\parallel/\alpha$, and whether the waiting time between pulses rises radially as Eq. (67). A blob that keeps moving at undiminished speed while its amplitude decays would rule out the stagnation mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is stagnation: because the velocity depends on the instantaneous amplitude, a pulse with initial amplitude $a_0$ and velocity $v_0 = c_v\langle v_0\rangle (a_0/\langle a_0\rangle)^\alpha$ comes to rest at $X_{\max} = c_v\langle v_0\rangle \tau_\parallel/\alpha \, (a_0/\langle a_0\rangle)^\alpha$, instead of continuing outward. Slow, small-amplitude pulses therefore never reach large radii. For a linear relation ($\alpha = 1$), the cumulants of the process are exactly $\kappa_n(x) = \langle a_0\rangle^n (n-1)!/\langle w_0\rangle \cdot \tau_\parallel \ell/(n\langle v_0\rangle \tau_\parallel + \ell) \exp(-x/(\langle v_0\rangle\tau_\parallel))$, so the mean value of the process is the same exponential as in the constant-velocity filtered Poisson model, while the average pulse amplitude and average velocity are radially constant and the average waiting time grows as $\exp(x/(\langle v_0\rangle\tau_\parallel))$.

Load-bearing premise

Everything hinges on the assumption that a blob's velocity at every instant is set by its instantaneous amplitude through the same power law used for initial blob velocities; the cited scaling theories were derived for quasi-steady or initial blob parameters and do not by themselves guarantee that a decaying blob slows down exactly this way.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the linear ($\alpha = 1$) case, the mean scrape-off-layer density profile remains exponential with e-folding length $\langle v_0\rangle\tau_\parallel$, even though pulses are slowing down; the flattening that stagnation might naively produce is exactly compensated by the broad correlated velocity distribution.
  • For $\alpha = 1$, average pulse amplitude and average velocity are constant across radius, so any radial change in the measured mean must come from changes in the pulse rate and duration, not from damping of individual pulses.
  • The average waiting time between pulses increases radially (stretched exponential for general $\alpha$, pure exponential for $\alpha = 1$), which means the number of pulses reaching the far scrape-off layer drops sharply.
  • Relative fluctuation level, skewness, and flatness all increase with radius, which strengthens intermittent plasma-wall interactions in the far scrape-off layer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the authors leave implicit is that single-point statistics alone cannot distinguish this model from the constant-velocity model in the linear case; discriminating tests should measure the waiting-time profile and the higher moments, not just the mean profile.
  • The stretched-exponential waiting-time formula is a distinctive fingerprint: if real scrape-off-layer data show waiting times growing with radius while average amplitudes stay roughly constant, that would corroborate amplitude-slowed stagnation.
  • The mechanism is generic beyond fusion plasmas: any population of pulses with linear damping and power-law speed-amplitude coupling will exhibit stagnation, so the same statistical signatures could be sought in other convective transport systems, such as atmospheric plumes or astrophysical outflows.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends the filtered-Poisson-process stochastic model of scrape-off-layer fluctuations by letting each pulse velocity depend on the instantaneous pulse amplitude through a power law, V(t)=cv<v0>(A(t)/<a0>)^alpha, while the amplitude decays exponentially due to parallel losses. Under this closure, every pulse decelerates and stagnates at a finite radial position Xmax, and the authors derive closed-form expressions for the radial dependence of pulse amplitudes, velocities, durations, waiting times, and process cumulants. For alpha=1 the mean value remains exponential with the same e-folding length as the constant-velocity reference case, while the average pulse amplitude and velocity are radially constant; for alpha=1/2 and general alpha, explicit distributions and moment profiles are obtained. An appendix treats the stationarity of the process and the finite-size end effects of pulse arrival times at a downstream position.

Significance. If the closure in Eq. (39) is accepted, this is a valuable analytic contribution: it produces explicit, falsifiable predictions for how blob transport shapes SOL profiles, including radial growth of the average waiting time, radially constant amplitude and velocity for alpha=1, and enhanced higher-order fluctuation moments. The internal algebra is careful and consistent; spot checks of Eqs. (40), (44), (67), and (74) confirm the main chain of derivation. The paper also provides a useful summary table and an explicit treatment of stationarity. The main limitation is that the instantaneous velocity-amplitude relation is postulated from quasi-steady blob scaling theories rather than derived or validated for decaying blobs, so the novelty is conditional on that closure. The authors openly state in Sec. V that comparison with experimental data and turbulence simulations is deferred to future work.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III A, Eq. (39)] The load-bearing assumption is that the pulse velocity at every instant is slaved to the instantaneous amplitude through V(t)=cv<v0>(A(t)/<a0>)^alpha. The cited blob velocity scaling theories (Refs. 36-55) are derived for quasi-steady or initially seeded filaments and do not by themselves imply that a blob undergoing exponential amplitude decay adiabatically follows the same power law. Since pulse stagnation (Eqs. (40)-(41)), the radial waiting-time growth (Eq. (67)), and the alpha=1 constant amplitude and velocity predictions (Eqs. (56) and (60)) all follow by exact integration of this closure, the manuscript should either validate the closure against blob-resolving simulations or dedicated experiments, or explicitly present it as a phenomenological hypothesis and state the timescale condition under which adiabatic following is expected (for example, a velocity response time much shorter than tau_parallel). This is not an internal inconsistency, but it is a correctness-risk concern for the paper's central claims.
  2. [Sec. IV B, Eqs. (73)-(76)] The general cumulant expression (73) and the closed-form results for alpha=1 (Eq. (74)) and alpha=1/2 (Eq. (76)) are presented with only a brief reference to 'a similar procedure', even though Eq. (74) underpins the central statement that the alpha=1 mean profile is exactly the reference-case exponential while higher-order moments grow with radius. Please provide the derivation of Eq. (73) and the subsequent integration steps, or relegate the details to an appendix, so that the reader can verify the n-dependent effective duration tau_parallel ell/(n<v0>tau_parallel+ell) and the absence of the factor n in the exponential decay length. As it stands, these formulas are asserted rather than demonstrated, despite being central to the paper's quantitative claims.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table I] The alpha=1/2 entry for the average waiting time appears inconsistent with Eq. (67). Substituting alpha=1/2 and cv=2/pi^{1/2} into Eq. (67) gives <w_xi>=<w0>exp(pi xi^2/(16(<v0>tau_parallel)^2)), whereas the table prints exp((pi^{1/2} x/(2<v0>tau_parallel))^{1/2}), which has a different x-dependence. Please correct the table entry.
  2. [Fig. 5 caption and Sec. II D] The caption of Fig. 5 describes the reference case with 'dotted lines', while the surrounding text refers to 'dashed lines' for the same reference case. Please make the line-style naming consistent.
  3. [Sec. VI, final paragraph] The concluding sentence states 'a linear dependence of pulse velocities on the instantaneous velocities'; this should read 'instantaneous amplitudes', since Eq. (39) relates velocity to amplitude.
  4. [Sec. III B] For alpha=1, the statement that the duration distribution is 'the same for all radial positions' follows from Eq. (51), but the physical reason is worth stating explicitly: the cancellation occurs because, for alpha=1, the radial shift in the velocity distribution exactly compensates the amplitude-dependent stagnation. A short explanatory sentence would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all predictions follow by analytic integration from the explicitly stated Eq. (39) closure; no fitted input is repackaged as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper is a self-contained stochastic calculation from clearly stated assumptions. Equation (39), V(t)/⟨v0⟩ = cv(A(t)/⟨a0⟩)^α, is introduced as a modeling closure motivated by blob velocity scaling theories, and the paper does not pretend to derive it from the rest of the model. Every subsequent result—the stagnation position Xmax in Eqs. (40)–(41), the radial amplitude and velocity relations in Eqs. (44)–(45), the waiting-time growth in Eq. (67), and the α=1 cumulants in Eq. (74)—is obtained by direct integration and averaging over the stated pulse dynamics and the assumed exponential amplitude and Poisson waiting-time distributions. No parameter is fitted to the quantity being predicted, and no result is forced by a self-citation chain. The heavy citation of the authors' prior stochastic framework (Refs. 56–70) provides context and previous notation, but the present derivation is re-derived in the manuscript, not merely imported. The main physical caveat—whether a blob's instantaneous velocity actually follows the instantaneous amplitude power law—is an unvalidated assumption and a correctness risk, but it is not circularity: the predictions are conditional consequences of that assumption, not equivalent to it by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces one scenario parameter, α, which controls the strength of the amplitude-velocity coupling; its value is imported from blob scaling theory rather than fitted. The remaining inputs (pulse size, damping time, average amplitude, velocity, waiting time) are physical quantities specified at the reference position. The key axioms are the empirically motivated pulse statistics and the instantaneous power-law velocity scaling.

free parameters (1)
  • Velocity-amplitude scaling exponent α = α = 1/2 (inertial) or α = 1 (sheath dissipative), not fitted here
    Controls the stagnation distance Xmax and the radial growth of waiting time; the paper takes it as an input from blob velocity scaling theories rather than fitting to data.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Pulse arrivals at the reference position follow a Poisson process
    Eq. (12); motivated by experimental waiting time statistics (Refs. 71-85).
  • domain assumption Pulse amplitudes at the reference position are exponentially distributed
    Eq. (11); consistent with single-point measurements of burst amplitudes.
  • domain assumption The pulse shape is a one-sided exponential
    Eq. (9); based on blob front and wake measurements and simulation results (Refs. 14,36).
  • domain assumption Linear damping with a constant time τ_parallel acts on all pulses
    Eq. (2); treats parallel losses as linear drag, ignoring amplitude-dependent parallel transport.
  • domain assumption The instantaneous pulse velocity follows a power law of the instantaneous amplitude
    Eq. (39); this is the weakest premise, since blob velocity scaling theories are derived for quasi-steady parameters and may not hold instantaneously.
  • domain assumption All pulses have the same radial size ℓ
    Assumed throughout the paper; size distributions are not considered.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stochastic modeling of blob-like plasma filaments in the scrape-off layer: Time-dependent velocities and pulse stagnation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T5C7WR7H

@misc{pith2026241204966,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stochastic modeling of blob-like plasma filaments in the scrape-off layer: Time-dependent velocities and pulse stagnation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T5C7WR7H}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04966}
}
read the original abstract

A stochastic model for a super-position of uncorrelated pulses with a random distribution of and correlations between amplitudes and velocities is analyzed. The pulses are assumed to move radially with fixed shape and amplitudes decreasing exponentially in time due to linear damping. The pulse velocities are taken to be time-dependent with a power law dependence on the instantaneous amplitudes, as suggested by blob velocity scaling theories. In accordance with experimental measurements, the pulse function is assumed to be exponential and the amplitudes are taken to be exponentially distributed. As a consequence of linear damping and time-dependent velocities, it is demonstrated that the pulses stagnate during their radial motion. This makes the average pulse waiting time increase radially outwards in the scrape-off layer of magnetically confined plasmas. In the case that pulse velocities are proportional to their amplitudes, the mean value of the process decreases exponentially with radial coordinate, similar to the case when all pulses have the same, time-independent velocity. The profile e-folding length is then given by the product of the average pulse velocity and the parallel transit time. Moreover, both the average pulse amplitude and the average velocity are the same at all radial positions due to stagnation of slow and small-amplitude pulses. In general, an increasing average pulse velocity results in a flattened radial profile of the mean value of the process as well as a higher relative fluctuation level, strongly enhancing plasma-surface interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04966 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Probability density function of pulse durations at t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Normalized average pulse duration as function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Probability density function of the pulse amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Radial variation of the average pulse amplitude for p [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Radial variation of the lowest order moments for puls [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Radial variation of the pulse amplitude for various v [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Radial variation of a one-sided exponential pulse at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Temporal pulse evolution at the reference position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Probability density function of the pulse durations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Radial variation of the average pulse duration for v [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Probability density function of the pulse amplitud [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Radial variation of the average pulse amplitude for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Probability density function of the pulse velociti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Radial variation of the average pulse velocity for v [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Radial variation of the average pulse waiting time fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Radial variation of the lowest order moments for pul [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Secondly, there is an expo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_17.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Probability distribution of pulse arrival times [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Probability distribution of pulse arrival times fo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_18.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    " * write output.state after.block = add.period

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor eid howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence := #2 'after.sentence := #3 'after.bl...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    A. J. Wootton, B. A. Carreras, H. Matsumoto, K. McGuire, W. A. Peebles, C. P. Ritz, P. W. Terry, and S. J. Zweben, Fluctuations and anomalous transport in tokamaks , Physics of Fluids B 2, 2879 (1990)

    1990

  4. [4]

    A. V. Nedospasov, Edge turbulence in tokamaks , Journal of Nuclear Materials 196-198, 90 (1992)

    1992

  5. [5]

    Endler, Turbulent SOL transport in stellarators and tokamaks , Journal of Nuclear Materials 266, 84 (1999)

    M. Endler, Turbulent SOL transport in stellarators and tokamaks , Journal of Nuclear Materials 266, 84 (1999)

    1999

  6. [6]

    D. A. D'Ippolito, J. R. Myra, S. I. Krasheninnikov, G. Q. Yu, and A. Y. Pigarov, Blob transport in the tokamak scrape-off-layer , Contributions to Plasma Physics 44, 205 (2004)

    2004

  7. [7]

    B. A. Carreras, Plasma edge cross-field transport: Experiment and theory , Journal of Nuclear Materials 337-339, 315 (2005)

    2005

  8. [8]

    S. J. Zweben, J. A. Boedo, O. Grulke, C. Hidalgo, B. LaBombard, R. J. Maqueda, P. Scarin, and J. L. Terry, Edge turbulence measurements in toroidal fusion devices , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 49, S1 (2007)

    2007

Show all 97 references
  1. [9]

    Naulin, Turbulent transport and the plasma edge , Journal of Nuclear Materials 363-365, 24 (2007)

    V. Naulin, Turbulent transport and the plasma edge , Journal of Nuclear Materials 363-365, 24 (2007)

    2007

  2. [10]

    S. I. Krasheninnikov, D. A. D'Ippolito, and J. R. Myra, Recent theoretical progress in understanding coherent structures in edge and SOL turbulence , Journal of Plasma Physics 74, 679 (2008)

    2008

  3. [11]

    O. E. Garcia, Blob transport in the plasma edge: a review , Plasma and Fusion Research 4, 019 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    D. A. D'Ippolito, J. R. Myra, and S. J. Zweben, Convective transport by intermittent blob-filaments: Comparison of theory and experiment , Physics of Plasmas 18, 060501 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    S. J. Zweben, Search for coherent structures within tokamak plasma turbulence , Physics of Fluids 28, 974 (1985)

    1985

  6. [14]

    S. J. Zweben and S. S. Medley, Visible imaging of edge fluctuations in the TFTR tokamak , Physics of Fluids B 1, 2058 (1989)

    1989

  7. [15]

    S. I. Krasheninnikov, On scrape off layer plasma transport , Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics 283, 368 (2001)

    2001

  8. [16]

    N. Bian, S. Benkadda, J. V. Paulsen, and O. E. Garcia, Blobs and front propagation in the scrape-off layer of magnetic confinement devices , Physics of Plasmas 10, 671 (2003)

    2003

  9. [17]

    Grulke, J

    O. Grulke, J. L. Terry, B. LaBombard, and S. J. Zweben, Radially propagating fluctuation structures in the scrape-off layer of Alcator C - Mod , Physics of Plasmas 13, 012306 (2006)

    2006

  10. [18]

    Asakura, Y

    N. Asakura, Y. Koide, K. Itami, N. Hosogane, K. Shimizu, S. Tsuji-Iio, S. Sakurai, and A. Sakasai, SOL plasma profiles under radiative and detached divertor conditions in JT - 60U , Journal of Nuclear Materials 241-243, 559 (1997)

    1997

  11. [19]

    LaBombard, M

    B. LaBombard, M. V. Umansky, R. L. Boivin, J. A. Goetz, J. Hughes, B. Lipschultz, D. Mossessian, C. S. Pitcher, and J. L. Terry, Cross-field plasma transport and main-chamber recycling in diverted plasmas on Alcator C - Mod , Nuclear Fusion 40, 2041 (2000)

    2000

  12. [20]

    LaBombard, R

    B. LaBombard, R. L. Boivin, M. Greenwald, J. Hughes, B. Lipschultz, D. Mossessian, C. S. Pitcher, J. L. Terry, and S. J. Zweben, Particle transport in the scrape-off layer and its relationship to discharge density limit in Alcator C - Mod , Physics of Plasmas 8, 2107 (2001)

    2001

  13. [21]

    J. A. Boedo, D. Rudakov, R. Moyer, S. Krasheninnikov, D. Whyte, G. McKee, G. Tynan, M. Schaffer, P. Stangeby, P. West, S. Allen, T. Evans, R. Fonck, E. Hollmann, A. Leonard, A. Mahdavi, G. Porter, M. Tillack, and G. Antar, Transport by intermittent convection in the boundary o...

    2001

  14. [22]

    Lipschultz, B

    B. Lipschultz, B. LaBombard, C. S. Pitcher, and R. Boivin, Investigation of the origin of neutrals in the main chamber of Alcator C - Mod , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 44, 733 (2002)

    2002

  15. [23]

    G. Y. Antar, G. Counsell, Y. Yu, B. LaBombard, and P. Devynck, Universality of intermittent convective transport in the scrape-off layer of magnetically confined devices , Physics of Plasmas 10, 419 (2003)

    2003

  16. [24]

    J. A. Boedo, D. L. Rudakov, R. A. Moyer, G. R. McKee, R. J. Colchin, M. J. Schaffer, P. G. Stangeby, W. P. West, S. L. Allen, T. E. Evans, R. J. Fonck, E. M. Hollmann, S. Krasheninnikov, A. W. Leonard, W. Nevins, M. A. Mahdavi, G. D. Porter, G. R. Tynan, D. G. Whyte, and X. Xu...

    2003

  17. [25]

    D. L. Rudakov, J. A. Boedo, R. A. Moyer, P. C. Stangeby, J. G. Watkins, D. G. Whyte, L. Zeng, N. H. Brooks, R. P. Doerner, T. E. Evans, M. E. Fenstermacher, M. Groth, E. M. Hollmann, S. I. Krasheninnikov, C. J. Lasnier, A. W. Leonard, M. A. Mahdavi, G. R. McKee, A. G. McLean, ...

    2005

  18. [26]

    D. G. Whyte, B. L. Lipschultz, P. C. Stangeby, J. Boedo, D. L. Rudakov, J. G. Watkins, and W. P. West, The magnitude of plasma flux to the main-wall in the DIII - D tokamak , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 47, 1579 (2005)

    2005

  19. [27]

    O. E. Garcia, J. Horacek, R. A. Pitts, A. H. Nielsen, W. Fundamenski, J. P. Graves, V. Naulin, and J. J. Rasmussen, Interchange turbulence in the TCV scrape-off layer , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 48, L1 (2006)

    2006

  20. [28]

    Lipschultz, X

    B. Lipschultz, X. Bonnin, G. Counsell, A. Kallenbach, A. Kukushkin, K. Krieger, A. Leonard, A. Loarte, R. Neu, R. A. Pitts, T. Rognlien, J. Roth, C. Skinner, J. L. Terry, E. Tsitrone, D. Whyte, S. Zweben, N. Asakura, D. Coster, R. Doerner, R. Dux, G. Federici, M. Fenstermacher...

    2007

  21. [29]

    O. E. Garcia, J. Horacek, R. A. Pitts, A. H. Nielsen, W. Fundamenski, V. Naulin, and J. Juul Rasmussen, Fluctuations and transport in the TCV scrape-off layer , Nuclear Fusion 47, 667 (2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    J. L. Terry, B. LaBombard, B. Lipschultz, M. J. Greenwald, J. E. Rice, and S. J. Zweben, The scrape-off layer in alcator C - Mod : Transport , turbulence, and flows , Fusion Science and Technology 51, 342 (2007)

    2007

  23. [31]

    Carralero, G

    D. Carralero, G. Birkenmeier, H. W. Müller, P. Manz, P. Demarne, S. H. Müller, F. Reimold, U. Stroth, M. Wischmeier, and E. Wolfrum, An experimental investigation of the high density transition of the scrape-off layer transport in ASDEX Upgrade , Nuclear Fusion 54, 123005 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    J. A. Boedo, J. R. Myra, S. Zweben, R. Maingi, R. J. Maqueda, V. A. Soukhanovskii, J. W. Ahn, J. Canik, N. Crocker, D. A. D'Ippolito, R. Bell, H. Kugel, B. Leblanc, L. A. Roquemore, and D. L. Rudakov, Edge transport studies in the edge and scrape-off layer of the National Sphe...

    2014

  25. [33]

    Vianello, C

    N. Vianello, C. Tsui, C. Theiler, S. Allan, J. Boedo, B. Labit, H. Reimerdes, K. Verhaegh, W. A. J. Vijvers, N. Walkden, S. Costea, J. Kovacic, C. Ionita, V. Naulin, A. H. Nielsen, J. J. Rasmussen, B. Schneider, R. Schrittwieser, M. Spolaore, D. Carralero, J. Madsen, B. Lipsch...

    2017

  26. [34]

    Carralero, J

    D. Carralero, J. Madsen, S. A. Artene, M. Bernert, G. Birkenmeier, T. Eich, G. Fuchert, F. Laggner, V. Naulin, P. Manz, N. Vianello, and E. Wolfrum, A study on the density shoulder formation in the SOL of H -mode plasmas , Nuclear Materials and Energy 12, 1189 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    R. Kube, O. E. Garcia, A. Theodorsen, A. Q. Kuang, B. LaBombard, J. L. Terry, and D. Brunner, Statistical properties of the plasma fluctuations and turbulent cross-field fluxes in the outboard mid-plane scrape-off layer of Alcator C - Mod , Nuclear Materials and Energy 18, 193 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Vianello, D

    N. Vianello, D. Carralero, C. K. Tsui, V. Naulin, M. Agostini, I. Cziegler, B. Labit, C. Theiler, E. Wolfrum, D. Aguiam, S. Allan, M. Bernert, J. Boedo, S. Costea, H. D. Oliveira, O. Fevrier, J. Galdon-Quiroga1, G. Grenfell, A. Hakola, C. Ionita, H. Isliker, A. Karpushov, J. K...

    2020

  29. [37]

    Stagni, N

    A. Stagni, N. Vianello, C. K. Tsui, C. Colandrea, S. Gorno, M. Bernert, J. A. Boedo, D. Brida, G. Falchetto, A. Hakola, G. Harrer, H. Reimerdes, C. Theiler, E. Tsitrone, N. Walkden, the TCV T eam , and the EURO fusion MST1 T eam , Dependence of scrape-off layer profiles and tu...

    2022

  30. [38]

    O. E. Garcia, N. H. Bian, V. Naulin, A. H. Nielsen, and J. J. Rasmussen, Mechanism and scaling for convection of isolated structures in nonuniformly magnetized plasmas , Physics of Plasmas 12, 090701 (2005)

    2005

  31. [39]

    Madsen, O

    J. Madsen, O. E. Garcia, J. Strk Larsen, V. Naulin, A. H. Nielsen, and J. J. Rasmussen, The influence of finite Larmor radius effects on the radial interchange motions of plasma filaments , Physics of Plasmas 18, 112504 (2011)

    2011

  32. [40]

    Kube and O

    R. Kube and O. E. Garcia, Effect of dynamical friction on interchange motion of plasma filaments , Physics of Plasmas 19, 042305 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Wiesenberger, J

    M. Wiesenberger, J. Madsen, and A. Kendl, Radial convection of finite ion temperature, high amplitude plasma blobs , Physics of Plasmas 21, 092301 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    Olsen, J

    J. Olsen, J. Madsen, A. H. Nielsen, J. J. Rasmussen, and V. Naulin, Temperature dynamics and velocity scaling laws for interchange driven, warm ion plasma filaments , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58, 044011 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    H. L. Pécseli, D. S. Sortland, and O. E. Garcia, A solvable blob-model for magnetized plasmas , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58, 104002 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    M. Held, M. Wiesenberger, J. Madsen, and A. Kendl, The influence of temperature dynamics and dynamic finite ion Larmor radius effects on seeded high amplitude plasma blobs , Nuclear Fusion 56, 126005 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Wiesenberger, M

    M. Wiesenberger, M. Held, R. Kube, and O. E. Garcia, Unified transport scaling laws for plasma blobs and depletions , Physics of Plasmas 24, 064502 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Held and M

    M. Held and M. Wiesenberger, Beyond the O berbeck– B oussinesq and long wavelength approximation , Nuclear Fusion 63, 026008 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    O. E. Garcia, N. H. Bian, and W. Fundamenski, Radial interchange motions of plasma filaments , Physics of Plasmas 13, 082309 (2006)

    2006

  40. [48]

    Kube and O

    R. Kube and O. E. Garcia, Velocity scaling for filament motion in scrape-off layer plasmas , Physics of Plasmas 18, 102314 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    P. Manz, D. Carralero, G. Birkenmeier, H. W. Müller, S. H. Müller, G. Fuchert, B. D. Scott, and U. Stroth, Filament velocity scaling laws for warm ions , Physics of Plasmas 20, 102307 (2013)

    2013

  42. [50]

    J. T. Omotani, F. Militello, L. Easy, and N. R. Walkden, The effects of shape and amplitude on the velocity of scrape-off layer filaments , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58, 014030 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    N. R. Walkden, L. Easy, F. Militello, and J. T. Omotani, Dynamics of 3D isolated thermal filaments , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58, 115010 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    D. A. D'Ippolito, J. R. Myra, and S. I. Krasheninnikov, Cross-field blob transport in tokamak scrape-off-layer plasmas , Physics of Plasmas 9, 222 (2002)

    2002

  45. [53]

    J. R. Myra, D. A. Russell, and D. A. D'Ippolito, Collisionality and magnetic geometry effects on tokamak edge turbulent transport. I . A two-region model with application to blobs , Physics of Plasmas 13, 112502 (2006)

    2006

  46. [54]

    Theiler, I

    C. Theiler, I. Furno, P. Ricci, A. Fasoli, B. Labit, S. H. Müller, and G. Plyushchev, Cross-field motion of plasma blobs in an open magnetic field line configuration , Physical Review Letters 103, 065001 (2009)

    2009

  47. [55]

    L. Easy, F. Militello, J. Omotani, B. Dudson, E. Havlíčková, P. Tamain, V. Naulin, and A. H. Nielsen, Three dimensional simulations of plasma filaments in the scrape off layer: A comparison with models of reduced dimensionality , Physics of Plasmas 21, 122515 (2014)

    2014

  48. [56]

    F. D. Halpern, A. Cardellini, P. Ricci, S. Jolliet, J. Loizu, and A. Mosetto, Three-dimensional simulations of blob dynamics in a simple magnetized torus , Physics of Plasmas 21, 022305 (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    L. Easy, F. Militello, J. Omotani, N. R. Walkden, and B. Dudson, Investigation of the effect of resistivity on scrape off layer filaments using three-dimensional simulations , Physics of Plasmas 23, 012512 (2016)

    2016

  50. [58]

    O. E. Garcia, Stochastic modeling of intermittent scrape-off layer plasma fluctuations , Physical Review Letters 108, 265001 (2012)

    2012

  51. [59]

    Kube and O

    R. Kube and O. E. Garcia, Convergence of statistical moments of particle density time series in scrape-off layer plasmas , Physics of Plasmas 22, 012502 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    Theodorsen and O

    A. Theodorsen and O. E. Garcia, Level crossings, excess times, and transient plasma-wall interactions in fusion plasmas , Physics of Plasmas 23, 040702 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Theodorsen, O

    A. Theodorsen, O. E. Garcia, and M. Rypdal, Statistical properties of a filtered Poisson process with additive random noise: Distributions , correlations and moment estimation , Physica Scripta 92, 54002 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    O. E. Garcia and A. Theodorsen, Auto-correlation function and frequency spectrum due to a super-position of uncorrelated exponential pulses , Physics of Plasmas 24, 032309 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    Theodorsen and O

    A. Theodorsen and O. E. Garcia, Level crossings and excess times due to a superposition of uncorrelated exponential pulses , Physical Review E 97, 012110 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Theodorsen and O

    A. Theodorsen and O. E. Garcia, Probability distribution functions for intermittent scrape-off layer plasma fluctuations , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 60, 034006 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    O. E. Garcia, R. Kube, A. Theodorsen, and H. L. Pécseli, Stochastic modelling of intermittent fluctuations in the scrape-off layer: Correlations , distributions, level crossings, and moment estimation , Physics of Plasmas 23, 052308 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    J. M. Losada, A. Theodorsen, and O. E. Garcia, Stochastic modeling of blob-like plasma filaments in the scrape-off layer: Theoretical foundation , Physics of Plasmas 30, 042518 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    J. M. Losada, O. Paikina, and O. E. Garcia, Stochastic modeling of blob-like plasma filaments in the scrape-off layer: Correlated amplitudes and velocities , Physics of Plasmas 31, 042514 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    Militello and J

    F. Militello and J. T. Omotani, Scrape off layer profiles interpreted with filament dynamics , Nuclear Fusion 56, 104004 (2016)

    2016

  61. [69]

    Militello and J

    F. Militello and J. T. Omotani, On the relation between non-exponential scrape off layer profiles and the dynamics of filaments , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58, 125004 (2016)

    2016

  62. [70]

    Militello, T

    F. Militello, T. Farley, K. Mukhi, N. Walkden, and J. T. Omotani, A two-dimensional statistical framework connecting thermodynamic profiles with filaments in the scrape off layer and application to experiments , Physics of Plasmas 25, 056112 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    Ahmed, O

    S. Ahmed, O. E. Garcia, and A. Theodorsen, Reconstruction of intermittent time series as a superposition of pulses , Physical Review E 107, 054222 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    J. M. Losada, A. D. Helgeland, J. L. Terry, and O. E. Garcia, A three-point velocity estimation method for two-dimensional coarse-grained imaging data , AIP Advances 14, 095102 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    O. E. Garcia, I. Cziegler, R. Kube, B. LaBombard, and J. L. Terry, Burst statistics in Alcator C - Mod SOL turbulence , Journal of Nuclear Materials 438, S180 (2013)

    2013

  66. [74]

    O. E. Garcia, S. M. Fritzner, R. Kube, I. Cziegler, B. LaBombard, and J. L. Terry, Intermittent fluctuations in the Alcator C - Mod scrape-off layer , Physics of Plasmas 20, 055901 (2013)

    2013

  67. [75]

    R. Kube, A. Theodorsen, O. E. Garcia, B. LaBombard, and J. L. Terry, Fluctuation statistics in the scrape-off layer of Alcator C - Mod , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58, 054001 (2016)

    2016

  68. [76]

    Theodorsen, O

    A. Theodorsen, O. E. Garcia, J. Horacek, R. Kube, and R. A. Pitts, Scrape-off layer turbulence in TCV : Evidence in support of stochastic modelling , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 58, 044006 (2016)

    2016

  69. [77]

    O. E. Garcia, R. Kube, A. Theodorsen, J. G. Bak, S. H. Hong, H. S. Kim, t. K. P. Team, and R. A. Pitts, SOL width and intermittent fluctuations in KSTAR , Nuclear Materials and Energy 12, 36 (2017)

    2017

  70. [78]

    Theodorsen, O

    A. Theodorsen, O. E. Garcia, R. Kube, B. LaBombard, and J. L. Terry, Relationship between frequency power spectra and intermittent, large-amplitude bursts in the Alcator C - Mod scrape-off layer , Nuclear Fusion 57, 114004 (2017)

    2017

  71. [79]

    N. R. Walkden, A. Wynn, F. Militello, B. Lipschultz, G. Matthews, C. Guillemaut, J. Harrison, and D. Moulton, Statistical analysis of the ion flux to the JET outer wall , Nuclear Fusion 57, 036016 (2017)

    2017

  72. [80]

    N. R. Walkden, A. Wynn, F. Militello, B. Lipschultz, G. Matthews, C. Guillemaut, J. Harrison, D. Moulton, and JET Contributors , Interpretation of scrape-off layer profile evolution and first-wall ion flux statistics on JET using a stochastic framework based on fillamentary mo...

    2017

  73. [81]

    R. Kube, O. E. Garcia, A. Theodorsen, D. Brunner, A. Q. Kuang, B. LaBombard, and J. L. Terry, Intermittent electron density and temperature fluctuations and associated fluxes in the Alcator C - Mod scrape-off layer , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 60, 065002 (2018)

    2018

  74. [82]

    A. Q. Kuang, B. LaBombard, D. Brunner, O. E. Garcia, R. Kube, and A. Theodorsen, Plasma fluctuations in the scrape-off layer and at the divertor target in Alcator C - Mod and their relationship to divertor collisionality and density shoulder formation , Nuclear Materials and E...

    2019

  75. [83]

    Bencze, M

    A. Bencze, M. Berta, A. Buzás, P. Hacek, J. Krbec, and M. Szutyányi, Characterization of edge and scrape-off layer fluctuations using the fast Li - BES system on COMPASS , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 61, 085014 (2019)

    2019

  76. [84]

    R. Kube, A. Theodorsen, O. E. Garcia, D. Brunner, B. LaBombard, and J. L. Terry, Comparison between mirror Langmuir probe and gas-puff imaging measurements of intermittent fluctuations in the Alcator C - Mod scrape-off layer , Journal of Plasma Physics 86, 905860519 (2020)

    2020

  77. [85]

    Zurita, W

    M. Zurita, W. A. Hernandez, C. Crepaldi, F. A. C. Pereira, and Z. O. Guimar \ a es-Filho, Stochastic modeling of plasma fluctuations with bursts and correlated noise in TCABR , Physics of Plasmas 29, 052303 (2022)

    2022

  78. [86]

    S. J. Zweben, M. Lampert, and J. R. Myra, Temporal structure of blobs in NSTX , Physics of Plasmas 29, 072504 (2022)

    2022

  79. [87]

    Ahmed, O

    S. Ahmed, O. E. Garcia, A. Q. Kuang, B. LaBombard, J. L. Terry, and A. Theodorsen, Strongly intermittent far scrape-off layer fluctuations in A lcator C - M od plasmas close to the empirical discharge density limit , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 65, 105008 (2023)

    2023

  80. [88]

    Korzeniowska and O

    M. Korzeniowska and O. E. Garcia, Long-range correlations with finite-size effects from a superposition of uncorrelated pulses with power-law distributed durations , submitted to Journal of Statistical Mechanics arXiv:2410.07249 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Korzeniowska, A

    M. Korzeniowska, A. Theodorsen, M. Rypdal, and O. E. Garcia, Apparent universality of 1/f spectra as an artifact of finite-size effects , Physical Review Research L022066 (2023)

    2023

  82. [90]

    J. M. Losada and O. E. Garcia, Time delay estimation of coherent structure velocities from a super-position of localized pulses , submitted to Review of Scientific Instruments arXiv:2411.06544 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Johnsen, H

    H. Johnsen, H. L. Pécseli, and J. Trulsen, Conditional eddies in plasma turbulence , Physics of Fluids 30, 2239 (1987)

    1987

  84. [92]

    H. L. P \'e cseli and J. Trulsen, A statistical analysis of numerically simulated plasma turbulence , Physics of Fluids B 1, 1616 (1989)

    1989

  85. [93]

    F. J. Øynes, H. L. Pécseli, and K. Rypdal, Fluctuations in a magnetized toroidal plasma without rotational transform , Physical Review Letters 75, 81 (1995)

    1995

  86. [94]

    A. H. Nielsen, H. L. Pécseli, and J. Juul Rasmussen, Turbulent transport in low- plasmas , Physics of Plasmas 3, 1530 (1996)

    1996

  87. [95]

    Grulke, T

    O. Grulke, T. Klinger, and A. Piel, Experimental study of the dynamics of conditionally averaged structures in weakly developed electrostatic turbulence , Nuclear Fusion 6, 788 (1999)

    1999

  88. [96]

    Block, I

    D. Block, I. Teliban, F. Greiner, and A. Piel, Prospects and limitations of conditional averaging , Physica Scripta T T122, 25 (2006)

    2006

  89. [97]

    Theodorsen, O

    A. Theodorsen, O. E. Garcia, R. Kube, B. LaBombard, and J. L. Terry, Universality of Poisson -driven plasma fluctuations in the Alcator C - Mod scrape-off layer , Physics of Plasmas 25, 122309 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.