Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Polarization faticons: Chiral localized structures in self-defocusing Kerr resonators

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a self-defocusing Kerr resonator with two polarization modes can host a new family of chiral localized structures, polarization faticons, which break both temporal and polarization symmetry, and it reports their…

desk verdict First solid experimental demonstration of a new family of vectorial localized structures; the fitted XPM coefficient and the inherited symmetrization scheme are the main issues to probe, but the result holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05116 v1 pith:ZLBTQBRD submitted 2024-12-06 physics.optics

classification physics.optics PACS 42.65.Tg42.65.Sf42.60.Da
keywords polarizationfaticonsvectorialdissipativesolitonsspontaneoussymmetrybreakingKerrresonatormodulationalinstabilitydomainwallsself-defocusingnormaldispersion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a coherently driven, normally dispersive Kerr resonator supporting two circular polarization modes can host a new type of vectorial localized dissipative structure, named a polarization faticon. A faticon is a bright chiral pair of interlocked lobes of opposite circular handedness, separated by a dissipative polarization domain wall. The authors show numerically that these objects emerge from the collapse of a vectorial modulational instability pattern following polarization spontaneous symmetry breaking, and they report the first experimental observation of such structures in a spun-fiber ring resonator. If correct, this establishes a new class of symmetry-broken localized structures in the self-defocusing regime and offers a route to frequency-comb generation in normal-dispersion resonators.

What carries the argument

The core object is the faticon solution of the two-component mean-field Lugiato–Lefever equations, with cross-phase-modulation coefficient $B=1.85$ and normal dispersion. Its stability is carried by the dissipative polarization domain wall, which interlocks the two lobes and lets a bright structure exist in the self-defocusing regime. The other load-bearing element is the experimental symmetry-protection scheme: a $\pi$ phase-shift birefringent defect inside the resonator that swaps the handedness each round trip, averaging out asymmetries and reproducing the equal-driving, equal-detuning ideal assumed in the model.

What would settle it

Excite a polarization faticon under the reported conditions, then measure the two circular-mode spectra: the claim predicts a symmetric red-shift of the mode dominating the leading lobe and an equal blue-shift of the other, plus a π phase jump in the linear y-component at the center. A structure lacking these signatures, or one that persists unchanged when the π-defect is removed from the cavity, would falsify the chiral-faticon interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a coherently driven ring resonator with defocusing (normal-dispersion) Kerr nonlinearity and two circularly polarized modes can host a novel class of vectorial localized dissipative structures, which the paper names polarization faticons. A faticon is a bright, chiral object made of two interlocked lobes of opposite circular handedness, separated by a central dissipative polarization domain wall; the modal amplitudes $E_+$ and $E_-$ are equal at the core, where the field is linearly polarized and the orthogonal linear component exhibits a topological $\pi$ phase jump. Numerically and experimentally, faticons are observed to emerge from the collapse of a vectorial modulational instability pattern after polarization spontaneous symmetry breaking of the homogeneous steady state, and they persist indefinitely as the detuning is held fixed. The paper also maps their existence range with a Newton solver, finding stable and breathing faticons in a narrow band bordering the polarization-modulational-instability region.

Load-bearing premise

The construction requires the in-cavity π phase-shift defect to make the two circular modes experience identical driving and detuning in practice; if residual birefringence or polarization-dependent loss is not fully averaged, the observed structure may not match the modeled faticon.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Polarization faticons provide a new mechanism for frequency comb generation in the normal-dispersion (self-defocusing) regime, complementing dark-pulse and platicon combs.
  • They constitute the first experimental observation of SSB-mediated chiral vectorial localized dissipative structures, and only the second class of SSB-broken cavity solitons overall.
  • Because faticons have two mirror-image chiral configurations that occur with equal probability, they could serve as the basis for dual-comb generation in normal-dispersion resonators.
  • The same excitation route, scanning detuning until a vectorial MI pattern collapses, should generate faticons in any resonator described by incoherently coupled LLEs with $B \neq 1$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the collapse-of-MI mechanism is generic, other multi-component driven-dissipative systems with cross-coupling, such as bimodal atomic condensates or spinor gases, should exhibit analogous topological faticon states; a test would be to look for the same collapse signature in two-component complex Ginzburg–Landau models.
  • The $\pi$ phase jump at the faticon core suggests a topological charge; colliding two faticons of opposite chirality may annihilate or swap their lobes, potentially providing a deterministic all-optical switch, an effect the paper does not investigate.
  • The narrow existence band (approximately $7.7 \le \Delta \le 8.3$ at $X=15$) implies faticons are fine-tuned; in microresonators with stronger mode coupling, the symmetry-protection defect may need to be incorporated before faticon combs become practical.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports on a new class of localized dissipative structures, termed polarization faticons, in a coherently driven Kerr resonator with two polarization modes and normal group-velocity dispersion. Using coupled Lugiato-Lefever equations with cross-phase modulation, the authors show that spontaneous symmetry breaking leads to multiple homogeneous steady states, and that a vectorial modulational instability can collapse into a localized two-lobe structure with opposite circular polarizations separated by a domain wall. They present a theoretical phase diagram and a bifurcation diagram computed with a Newton solver, and they report experimental observations in a 12-m spun-fiber ring resonator with a π phase-shift defect that is used to enforce polarization symmetry. The experimental dynamics, temporal intensity profiles, and optical spectra are compared with numerical simulations and show good agreement. The paper claims the first experimental evidence of such chiral LDSs.

Significance. If validated, this work establishes a new class of localized dissipative structures that break both temporal and polarization symmetry and exist in the self-defocusing regime through the interlocking of two opposite-handed lobes by a domain wall. The theoretical analysis is thorough, with stable and breathing faticons mapped in parameter space using a Newton solver and the connection to vectorial modulational instability clearly demonstrated. The experimental implementation is carefully designed, using a symmetry-protection scheme from prior work [61], and the agreement between measured and simulated temporal and spectral traces is qualitatively strong; the observation of a π phase jump at the domain wall is a striking piece of evidence. The work is likely to inspire further studies in other multi-component dissipative systems.

major comments (1)
  1. [Experiment] The experimental identification of polarization faticons rests on the assumption that the π phase-shift birefringent defect placed inside the resonator renders the physical cavity exactly equivalent to the ideal mean-field model of Eqs. (1). The paper cites Ref. [61] for this 'symmetry protected regime,' but it does not provide the derivation of the effective stroboscopic map (the defect swaps the handedness of the field each round trip, making the cavity a Floquet system), nor does it validate the scheme under the specific experimental conditions (finesse ≈27, 12-m spun fiber, pulse driving). Because the claim of 'first experimental evidence' hinges on this equivalence, please include a concise derivation or a precise pointer to the corresponding equations in Ref. [61], quantify the tolerated deviations from an ideal π phase shift or residual birefringence for which the faticon remains stable, and explain how the 'unwrapping' of the swapping dynamics is implemented in the data processing and how this affects the comparison with the simulations.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Experiment] The XPM coefficient B is estimated at 1.85 by fitting experiments to theory in the same section; please state the fitting procedure and the estimated uncertainty, and discuss how the faticon existence range in Fig. 2 depends on B (e.g., for B=4/3 and B=2).
  2. [Experimental results (Fig. 5)] The experimental traces in Fig. 5 lack error bars or a noise estimate, so the claim of 'excellent agreement' is based on visual inspection; please include a quantitative comparison metric or at least state the experimental noise level.
  3. [End Matter (Fiber parameters)] Please specify the normalization that maps the experimental parameters (peak power, detuning frequency, dispersion) to the normalized quantities X and Δ in Eqs. (1), and justify the value X=15 used in the simulations.
  4. [End Matter (Driving beam)] The 10-GHz phase modulation used to create temporal trapping sites for the faticons is mentioned only in the End Matter; its effect on the measured dynamics and on the comparison with the model should be briefly discussed in the main text or in the End Matter.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Fitted XPM coefficient and a load-bearing self-citation underpin the experimental identification, but the faticon solutions are genuinely simulated and observed.

  1. self citation load bearing [Experiment section, second paragraph (p. 3)]
    "The one placed inside the resonator is configured to implement a π phase-shift linear birefringent defect to operate in the symmetry protected regime described in [61]. With that defect, the intracavity field’s handedness swaps at each round trip, resulting in the averaging of all asymmetries and enabling the realization of polarization SSB in ideal conditions, i.e., equal driving and detuning for both modes as assumed in Eqs. (1)."

    The experimental identification of the observed state with the faticon of Eqs. (1) hinges on the claim that the π-defect cavity is exactly described by the ideal mean-field equations. The only support offered for this equivalence is Ref. [61], whose author list overlaps heavily with the present paper (Coen, Xu, Oppo, Erkintalo, Murdoch, Fatome). The mapping from the actual round-trip handedness-swapping (Floquet) dynamics to Eqs. (1) is not re-derived or independently validated here (e.g., no comparison of the effective finesse, residual birefringence, or linear coupling). The central experimental premise thus rests on a self-citation rather than on evidence presented in this paper.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Experiment section, first paragraph (p. 3); compared against Figs. 2 and 5]
    "The XPM coefficient B was estimated at 1 .85 by comparing experiments with theory."

    B is a free parameter in Eqs. (1) that is fitted to the same experimental platform whose faticon measurements are later presented as matching 'numerical predictions' (Fig. 5). Since the theoretical faticon existence range in Fig. 2 and all dashed-curve 'predictions' use this fitted B, the quantitative agreement is partially enforced by the fit, not a parameter-free prediction. This is calibration rather than circular derivation, but it makes the 'prediction' weaker.

full rationale

The central theoretical result is not circular: Eqs. (1) are a standard two-component LLE; faticons are located by a Newton solver (Fig. 2, S1) and the MI-collapse route is simulated without reference to the experimental outcome. The experimental observation in Figs. 4 and 5 is qualitatively and quantitatively consistent with these simulations, and the existence of faticons does not follow by construction from any fitted parameter. However, two steps reduce the force of the 'prediction' claim. First, B=1.85 is not measured independently but 'estimated by comparing experiments with theory'; because Fig. 2 and the dashed 'simulation' curves in Fig. 5 use this value, the agreement is partly calibration. Second, the experimental claim that the π-defect cavity realizes 'ideal conditions ... as assumed in Eqs. (1)' is supported only by Ref. [61], a prior paper with largely overlapping authorship; the effective model is not re-derived here. This is a load-bearing self-citation. Neither step makes the central claim circular by construction, but they justify a score of 4 rather than 0-2. Other self-citations (e.g., [35], [37], [44], [51], [55]) are contextual references to known SSB/PDW/MI phenomena and are not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on the standard LLE mean-field approximation. The only fitting parameter is B. The experiment relies on a symmetry-protection scheme to justify the equal-driving assumption, and the model assumes zero linear inter-modal coupling.

free parameters (1)
  • XPM coefficient B = 1.85
    Estimated by comparing experiments with theory (Experiment section). Used in all simulations (X=15, B=1.85).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The coupled Lugiato-Lefever equations (Eq. 1) provide a valid mean-field description of the two-polarization-mode ring resonator.
    Standard model in this field; the paper relies on it for all predictions and comparisons.
  • domain assumption Equal driving and detuning for both circular polarization modes can be realized experimentally.
    Assumed in Eq. (1); achieved via the pi-shift birefringent defect (symmetry-protected regime, ref [61]).
  • domain assumption There is no significant linear coupling between the two circular modes; the modes interact only through incoherent cross-phase modulation.
    Spun fiber treated as isotropic; no linear coupling term in Eq. (1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Polarization faticons: Chiral localized structures in self-defocusing Kerr resonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZLBTQBRD

@misc{pith2026241205116,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Polarization faticons: Chiral localized structures in self-defocusing Kerr resonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZLBTQBRD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05116}
}
read the original abstract

We report on numerical predictions and experimental observations of a novel type of temporal localized dissipative structures that manifest themselves in the self-defocusing regime of driven nonlinear optical resonators with two polarization modes. These chiral dissipative solitons, which we term polarization faticons, break both temporal and polarization symmetry and consist of two bright lobes of opposite polarization handedness, interlocked by a domain wall. Our study reveals that faticons are connected to a vectorial modulational instability, from which they can be excited through a collapsing dynamic. Faticons could offer a novel pathway for frequency comb generation in normal dispersion resonators. More generally, they offer new fundamental insights into vectorial localized dissipative structures and could be relevant to other multi-component dissipative systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05116 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (b) for a pulsed drive mimicking the conditions of the experiments that will follow [note that faticons also exist with a continuous-wave (cw) drive]. To highlight the polarization asymmetry — and the handedness — of the intracavity field, we plot the difference between the modal intensities, ξ = |E+| 2 − |E−| 2 (fast time vs slow time), with the corresponding evolution of the detuning at the top. The field is initi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. show excellent qualitative agreement with the sim￾ulations presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exceptional, but Separate: Precursors to Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking

    physics.optics 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In three nonlinear optical resonator models, spontaneous symmetry breaking is shown to be dislocated from Jacobian exceptional points, yet a Jacobian exceptional point is a necessary precursor to the symmetry-breaking...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [61]

    S. Coen, B. Garbin, G. Xu, L. Quinn, N. Goldman, G.- L. Oppo, M. Erkintalo, S. G. Murdoch, and J. Fatome, Nonlinear topological symmetry protection in a dissipa- tive system, Nat. Commun. 15, 1398 (2024)

  2. [1]

    N. N. Akhmediev and A. Ankiewicz, eds., Dissipative Solitons: From Optics to Biology and Medicine , Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 751 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008)

  3. [2]

    Purwins, H

    H.-G. Purwins, H. U. B¨ odeker, and Sh. Amiranashvili, Dissipative solitons, Adv. Phys. 59, 485 (2010)

  4. [3]

    A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, A quantitative descrip- tion of membrane current and its application to conduc- tion and excitation in nerve, J. Physiol. 117, 500 (1952)

  5. [4]

    K. J. Lee, W. D. McCormick, Q. Ouyang, and H. L. Swin- ney, Pattern formation by interacting chemical fronts, Science 261, 192 (1993)

  6. [5]

    J. Wu, R. Keolian, and I. Rudnick, Observation of a non- propagating hydrodynamic soliton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1421 (1984)

  7. [6]

    Lioubashevski, H

    O. Lioubashevski, H. Arbell, and J. Fineberg, Dissipative solitary states in driven surface waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3959 (1996)

  8. [7]

    Yu. A. Astrov and H.-G. Purwins, Plasma spots in a gas discharge system: Birth, scattering and formation of molecules, Phys. Lett. A 283, 349 (2001)

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    Fernandez-Oto, M

    C. Fernandez-Oto, M. Tlidi, D. Escaff, and M. G. Clerc, Strong interaction between plants induces circular barren patches: Fairy circles, Phil. Transact. Royal Soc. A 372, 20140009 (2014)

  2. [9]

    Sch¨ apers, M

    B. Sch¨ apers, M. Feldmann, T. Ackemann, and W. Lange, Interaction of localized structures in an optical pattern- forming system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 748 (2000)

  3. [10]

    Ackemann, W

    T. Ackemann, W. J. Firth, and G.-L. Oppo, Chapter 6: Fundamentals and applications of spatial dissipative solitons in photonic devices, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 57, 323 (2009)

  4. [11]

    V. B. Taranenko, K. Staliunas, and C. O. Weiss, Spatial soliton laser: Localized structures in a laser with a sat- urable absorber in a self-imaging resonator, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1582 (1997)

  5. [12]

    Barland, J

    S. Barland, J. R. Tredicce, M. Brambilla, L. A. Lugiato, S. Balle, M. Giudici, T. Maggipinto, L. Spinelli, G. Tis- 6 soni, T. Kn¨ odl, M. Miller, and R. J¨ ager, Cavity solitons as pixels in semiconductor microcavities, Nature (Lon- don) 419, 699 (2002)

  6. [13]

    F. Leo, S. Coen, P. Kockaert, S.-P. Gorza, Ph. Emplit, and M. Haelterman, Temporal cavity solitons in one- dimensional Kerr media as bits in an all-optical buffer, Nat. Photon. 4, 471 (2010)

  7. [14]

    T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kon- dratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Tem- poral solitons in optical microresonators, Nat. Photon. 8, 145 (2014)

  8. [15]

    Oppo and W

    G.-L. Oppo and W. J. Firth, Theory and application of cavity solitons in photonic devices, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 85, in press (2024)

  9. [16]

    S. Coen, H. G. Randle, T. Sylvestre, and M. Erkintalo, Modeling of octave-spanning Kerr frequency combs us- ing a generalized mean-field Lugiato-Lefever model, Opt. Lett. 38, 37 (2013)

  10. [17]

    Pasquazi, M

    A. Pasquazi, M. Peccianti, L. Razzari, D. J. Moss, S. Coen, M. Erkintalo, Y. K. Chembo, T. Hansson, S. Wabnitz, P. Del’Haye, X. Xue, A. M. Weiner, and R. Morandotti, Micro-combs: A novel generation of op- tical sources, Physics Reports 729, 1 (2018)

  11. [18]

    T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and M. L. Gorodetsky, Dissipative Kerr solitons in optical microres- onators, Science 361, eaan8083 (2018)

  12. [19]

    Grelu and N

    P. Grelu and N. Akhmediev, Dissipative solitons for mode-locked lasers, Nat. Photon. 6, 84 (2012)

  13. [20]

    A. W. Bruch, X. Liu, Z. Gong, J. B. Surya, M. Li, C.-L. Zou, and H. X. Tang, Pockels soliton microcomb, Nat. Photon. 15, 21 (2021)

  14. [21]

    A. Roy, R. Nehra, S. Jahani, L. Ledezma, C. Langrock, M. Fejer, and A. Marandi, Temporal walk-off induced dis- sipative quadratic solitons, Nat. Photon. 16, 162 (2022)

  15. [22]

    Q. L. Williams, J. Garc ´ ıa-Ojalvo, and R. Roy, Fast in- tracavity polarization dynamics of an erbium-doped fiber ring laser: Inclusion of stochastic effects, Phys. Rev. A 55, 2376 (1997)

  16. [23]

    Marconi, J

    M. Marconi, J. Javaloyes, S. Barland, S. Balle, and M. Giudici, Vectorial dissipative solitons in vertical- cavity surface-emitting lasers with delays, Nat. Photon. 9, 450 (2015)

  17. [24]

    S. T. Cundiff, B. C. Collings, N. N. Akhmediev, J. M. Soto-Crespo, K. Bergman, and W. H. Knox, Observation of polarization-locked vector solitons in an optical fiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3988 (1999)

  18. [25]

    L. G. Wright, W. H. Renninger, D. N. Christodoulides, and F. W. Wise, Nonlinear multimode photonics: Non- linear optics with many degrees of freedom, Optica9, 824 (2022)

  19. [26]

    C. Bao, P. Liao, A. Kordts, L. Zhang, A. Matsko, M. Kar- pov, M. H. P. Pfeiffer, G. Xie, Y. Cao, A. Almaiman, M. Tur, T. J. Kippenberg, and A. E. Willner, Orthogo- nally polarized frequency comb generation from a Kerr comb via cross-phase modulation, Opt. Lett. 44, 1472 (2019)

  20. [27]

    Tsatourian, S

    V. Tsatourian, S. V. Sergeyev, C. Mou, A. Rozhin, V. Mikhailov, B. Rabin, P. S. Westbrook, and S. K. Tu- ritsyn, Polarisation dynamics of vector soliton molecules in mode locked fibre laser, Sci. Rep. 3, 3154 (2013)

  21. [28]

    Krupa, K

    K. Krupa, K. Nithyanandan, and P. Grelu, Vector dy- namics of incoherent dissipative optical solitons, Optica 4, 1239 (2017)

  22. [29]

    G. Xu, A. U. Nielsen, B. Garbin, L. Hill, G.-L. Oppo, J. Fatome, S. G. Murdoch, S. Coen, and M. Erkintalo, Spontaneous symmetry breaking of dissipative optical solitons in a two-component Kerr resonator, Nat. Com- mun. 12, 4023 (2021)

  23. [30]

    G. Xu, L. Hill, J. Fatome, G.-L. Oppo, M. Erkintalo, S. G. Murdoch, and S. Coen, Breathing dynamics of symmetry-broken temporal cavity solitons in Kerr ring resonators, Opt. Lett. 47, 1486 (2022)

  24. [31]

    Sigler and B

    A. Sigler and B. A. Malomed, Solitary pulses in lin- early coupled cubic–quintic Ginzburg–Landau equations, Physica D 212, 305 (2005)

  25. [32]

    Skarka, N

    V. Skarka, N. B. Aleksi´ c, M. Leki´ c, B. N. Aleksi´ c, B. A. Malomed, D. Mihalache, and H. Leblond, Formation of complex two-dimensional dissipative solitons via spon- taneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. A 90, 023845 (2014)

  26. [33]

    Descalzi and H

    O. Descalzi and H. R. Brand, Breaking of symmetry of interacting dissipative solitons can lead to partial anni- hilation, Phys. Rev. E 101, 040201 (2020)

  27. [34]

    Hill, E.-M

    L. Hill, E.-M. Hirmer, G. Campbell, T. Bi, A. Ghosh, P. Del’Haye, and G.-L. Oppo, Symmetry broken vecto- rial Kerr frequency combs from Fabry-P´ erot resonators, Commun. Phys. 7, 82 (2024)

  28. [35]

    Garbin, J

    B. Garbin, J. Fatome, G.-L. Oppo, M. Erkintalo, S. G. Murdoch, and S. Coen, Dissipative polarization domain walls in a passive coherently driven Kerr resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 023904 (2021)

  29. [36]

    Hansson, M

    T. Hansson, M. Bernard, and S. Wabnitz, Modulational instability of nonlinear polarization mode coupling in mi- croresonators, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 35, 835 (2018)

  30. [37]

    Fatome, B

    J. Fatome, B. Kibler, F. Leo, A. Bendahmane, G.-L. Oppo, B. Garbin, S. G. Murdoch, M. Erkintalo, and S. Coen, Polarization modulation instability in a non- linear fiber Kerr resonator, Opt. Lett. 45, 5069 (2020)

  31. [38]

    X. Xue, Y. Xuan, Y. Liu, P.-H. Wang, S. Chen, J. Wang, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, Mode-locked dark pulse Kerr combs in normal-dispersion microresonators, Nat. Photon. 9, 594 (2015)

  32. [39]

    Parra-Rivas, E

    P. Parra-Rivas, E. Knobloch, D. Gomila, and L. Gelens, Dark solitons in the Lugiato-Lefever equation with nor- mal dispersion, Phys. Rev. A 93, 063839 (2016)

  33. [40]

    F¨ ul¨ op, M

    A. F¨ ul¨ op, M. Mazur, A. Lorences-Riesgo,´O. B. Helgason, P.-H. Wang, Y. Xuan, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, P. A. Andrek- son, A. M. Weiner, and V. Torres-Company, High-order coherent communications using mode-locked dark-pulse Kerr combs from microresonators, Nat. Commun.9, 1598 (2018)

  34. [41]

    Lihachev, W

    G. Lihachev, W. Weng, J. Liu, L. Chang, J. Guo, J. He, R. N. Wang, M. H. Anderson, Y. Liu, J. E. Bowers, and T. J. Kippenberg, Platicon microcomb generation using laser self-injection locking, Nat. Commun. 13, 1771 (2022)

  35. [42]

    Goldman, O

    N. Goldman, O. K. Diessel, L. Barbiero, M. Pr¨ ufer, M. Di Liberto, and L. P. Peralta Gavensky, Floquet- engineered nonlinearities and controllable pair-hopping processes: From optical Kerr cavities to correlated quan- tum matter, Phys. Rev. X Quantum 4, 040327 (2023)

  36. [43]

    Dogra, M

    N. Dogra, M. Landini, K. Kroeger, L. Hruby, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Dissipation-induced structural instabil- ity and chiral dynamics in a quantum gas, Science 366, 1496 (2019). 7

  37. [44]

    Haelterman, S

    M. Haelterman, S. Trillo, and S. Wabnitz, Polarization multistability and instability in a nonlinear dispersive ring cavity, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 11, 446 (1994)

  38. [45]

    J. B. Geddes, J. V. Moloney, E. M. Wright, and W. J. Firth, Polarisation patterns in a nonlinear cavity, Opt. Commun. 111, 623 (1994)

  39. [46]

    G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 5th ed. (Academic Press, 2013)

  40. [47]

    A. E. Kaplan and P. Meystre, Directionally asymmetri- cal bistability in a symmetrically pumped nonlinear ring interferometer, Opt. Commun. 40, 229 (1982)

  41. [48]

    Del Bino, J

    L. Del Bino, J. M. Silver, S. L. Stebbings, and P. Del’Haye, Symmetry breaking of counter-propagating light in a nonlinear resonator, Sci. Rep. 7, 43142 (2017)

  42. [49]

    Q.-T. Cao, H. Wang, C.-H. Dong, H. Jing, R.-S. Liu, X. Chen, L. Ge, Q. Gong, and Y.-F. Xiao, Experimen- tal demonstration of spontaneous chirality in a nonlinear microresonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 033901 (2017)

  43. [50]

    Copie, M

    F. Copie, M. T. M. Woodley, L. Del Bino, J. M. Sil- ver, S. Zhang, and P. Del’Haye, Interplay of polarization and time-reversal symmetry breaking in synchronously pumped ring resonators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 013905 (2019)

  44. [51]

    Garbin, J

    B. Garbin, J. Fatome, G.-L. Oppo, M. Erkintalo, S. G. Murdoch, and S. Coen, Asymmetric balance in symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023244 (2020)

  45. [52]

    Hill, G.-L

    L. Hill, G.-L. Oppo, M. T. M. Woodley, and P. Del’Haye, Effects of self- and cross-phase modulation on the spon- taneous symmetry breaking of light in ring resonators, Phys. Rev. A 101, 013823 (2020)

  46. [53]

    Haelterman and A

    M. Haelterman and A. P. Sheppard, Polarization domain walls in diffractive or dispersive Kerr media, Opt. Lett. 19, 96 (1994)

  47. [54]

    Gilles, P.-Y

    M. Gilles, P.-Y. Bony, J. Garnier, A. Picozzi, M. Guasoni, and J. Fatome, Polarization domain walls in optical fibres as topological bits for data transmission, Nat. Photon. 11, 102 (2017)

  48. [55]

    Fatome, N

    J. Fatome, N. Berti, B. Kibler, G. Xu, S. G. Murdoch, M. Erkintalo, and S. Coen, Temporal manipulation of period-2 polarization domain wall solitons in a nonlinear fiber Kerr resonator, Opt. Commun. 548, 129810 (2023)

  49. [56]

    Kockaert, M

    P. Kockaert, M. Haelterman, S. Pitois, and G. Millot, Isotropic polarization modulational instability and do- main walls in spun fibers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 2873 (1999)

  50. [57]

    Malaguti, M

    S. Malaguti, M. Conforti, and S. Trillo, Dispersive radi- ation induced by shock waves in passive resonators, Opt. Lett. 39, 5626 (2014)

  51. [58]

    Y. Xu, A. Sharples, J. Fatome, S. Coen, M. Erkin- talo, and S. G. Murdoch, Frequency comb generation in a pulse-pumped normal dispersion Kerr mini-resonator, Opt. Lett. 46, 512 (2021)

  52. [59]

    Bunel, M

    T. Bunel, M. Conforti, J. Lumeau, A. Moreau, and A. Mussot, Broadband Kerr frequency comb in fiber Fabry-Perot resonators induced by switching waves, Phys. Rev. A 109, 063521 (2024)

  53. [60]

    J. M. McSloy, W. J. Firth, G. K. Harkness, and G.-L. Oppo, Computationally determined existence and stabil- ity of transverse structures. II. Multipeaked cavity soli- tons, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046606 (2002)

  54. [62]

    Erkintalo, S

    M. Erkintalo, S. G. Murdoch, and S. Coen, Phase and intensity control of dissipative Kerr cavity solitons, J. Roy. Soc. New Zealand 52, 149 (2022). 8 END MA TTER Bifurcation diagram. To illustrate in more detail how faticons are organized with respect to HSSs, we report in Fig...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.