Cross-feeding Creates Tipping Points in Microbiome Diversity

Thilo gross; Tom Clegg

arxiv: 2412.05212 · v1 · submitted 2024-12-06 · 🧬 q-bio.PE · physics.soc-ph

Cross-feeding Creates Tipping Points in Microbiome Diversity

Tom Clegg , Thilo gross This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 08:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.PE physics.soc-ph

keywords microbiome diversitycross-feedingtipping pointsnetwork collapseunculturabilitymicrobial ecologycommunity structureecological thresholds

0 comments

The pith

Cross-feeding networks in microbial communities reach tipping points that trigger abrupt diversity collapse.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a network model of how microbes interact through cross-feeding to sustain community structure. It finds that these networks can reach critical thresholds where small shifts cause the whole interaction web to fail, producing a sudden loss of species rather than a gradual decline. This framework accounts for why many microbes resist being grown in isolation. A reader would care because it links everyday microbial behavior to large-scale patterns in diversity and stability. The work treats unculturability as a direct consequence of how cross-feeding networks are organized.

Core claim

Using tools from network science, the authors construct a model of microbial community structure driven by cross-feeding. They discover tipping points at which diversity abruptly declines due to the catastrophic collapse of cross-feeding networks. Their results show that the unculturability of microbial diversity emerges as an inherent property of these networks, offering insight into the processes that shape microbiota and their robustness.

What carries the argument

A network model of microbial community structure built from cross-feeding interactions between populations.

If this is right

Microbiome diversity can shift from high to low in a sharp threshold response rather than through steady attrition.
The stability of a microbial community is tied to the connectivity pattern of its cross-feeding network.
Many species remain unculturable because they depend on network partners that cannot be replicated in isolation.
Perturbations that fragment cross-feeding links can produce large, irreversible changes in community composition.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Efforts to restore or engineer microbiomes might focus on preserving key cross-feeding connections rather than adding individual species.
Similar network-collapse mechanisms could appear in other systems where species rely on metabolic exchanges, such as soil or gut communities under stress.
Synthetic communities could be designed with redundant cross-feeding paths to avoid the identified tipping thresholds.

Load-bearing premise

The network model built from cross-feeding interactions is assumed to capture enough of real microbial community dynamics to generate tipping points and account for unculturability.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to measure whether real microbial communities show sudden, network-wide diversity drops when cross-feeding links are experimentally weakened, rather than gradual species loss.

read the original abstract

A key unresolved question in microbial ecology is how the extraordinary diversity of microbiomes emerges from the behaviour of individual populations. This process is driven by the cross-feeding networks that structure these communities, but are hard to untangle due to their inherent complexity. We address this problem using the tools of network science to develop a model of microbial community structure. We discover tipping points at which diversity abruptly declines due to the catastrophic collapse of cross-feeding networks. Our results are a rare example of an ecological tipping point in diversity and provide insight into the fundamental processes shaping microbiota and their robustness. We illustrate this by showing how the unculturability of microbial diversity emerges as an inherent property of their microbial cross-feeding networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper models cross-feeding as networks and claims they produce tipping points that cause abrupt diversity loss and explain unculturability, but the result stays model-dependent without clear empirical anchoring.

read the letter

The core claim is that cross-feeding networks in microbiomes can hit tipping points where the network collapses and diversity drops sharply, and that this same structure makes much of the diversity inherently unculturable. That linkage is the main new piece they put forward. They use network science methods to build a model of metabolite exchange and then track how community structure responds to changes in the network. The approach is straightforward and gives a mechanistic story for something that has been observed but not well explained in microbial ecology. It does a clean job of showing how network collapse can produce the kind of abrupt shift that matches some real-world patterns in diversity loss. The writing keeps the focus on the model dynamics rather than overclaiming. The main limitation is that the tipping-point behavior appears to rest on how the cross-feeding links are generated and how the collapse is defined. Without calibration to measured exchange rates or direct comparison to cultured versus uncultured community data, it is hard to tell whether the result is specific to microbiomes or just a general feature of the network setup. The abstract gives no parameter values or robustness checks, so the strength of the prediction depends on details that are not visible here. If the full paper includes sensitivity tests or ties the model outputs to existing datasets on metabolite sharing, that would tighten the argument. This is aimed at modelers and microbial ecologists who already work with network representations of communities. A reader looking for a simple mechanistic account of diversity maintenance and loss could find it useful as a starting point for further modeling. It is worth sending to peer review because the question matters and the modeling route is reasonable, even though the empirical grounding will need work in revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a network-science model of microbial cross-feeding interactions to explain community structure. It reports the existence of tipping points at which diversity collapses abruptly due to catastrophic failure of the cross-feeding network and concludes that the unculturability of most microbial taxa is an inherent property of such networks rather than a technical limitation.

Significance. If the model assumptions map onto measured metabolite exchange rates and observed community topologies, the work would supply a mechanistic account of microbiome diversity maintenance and a rare ecological example of a diversity tipping point. The parameter-free character of the derivation (if confirmed) and any reproducible code would strengthen its value for microbial ecology.

major comments (2)

[Abstract / model section] Abstract and model-construction section: the central claim that tipping points and inherent unculturability emerge from cross-feeding networks rests on an unevaluated model whose interaction rules, topology generation, and collapse dynamics are not shown to be calibrated against empirical cross-feeding data or compared to cultured/uncultured diversity metrics. Without such grounding it is impossible to determine whether the reported collapse is a microbiome-specific prediction or a generic network artifact.
[Results] Results on tipping-point identification: the manuscript must demonstrate that the abrupt diversity decline is robust to the specific network-generation procedure and interaction rules employed; otherwise the tipping-point prediction reduces to a restatement of the modeling assumptions rather than an independent ecological insight.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract contains no equations, parameter values, simulation details, or validation data, which hinders immediate assessment of the quantitative claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and recommendation of major revision. We address each point below with clarifications on the theoretical scope of the work and have incorporated additional analyses to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / model section] Abstract and model-construction section: the central claim that tipping points and inherent unculturability emerge from cross-feeding networks rests on an unevaluated model whose interaction rules, topology generation, and collapse dynamics are not shown to be calibrated against empirical cross-feeding data or compared to cultured/uncultured diversity metrics. Without such grounding it is impossible to determine whether the reported collapse is a microbiome-specific prediction or a generic network artifact.

Authors: The manuscript presents a theoretical network model whose purpose is to isolate and derive the consequences of cross-feeding for community diversity. Interaction rules follow the minimal definition of metabolite exchange used throughout microbial ecology, and topology generation employs standard ecological network models. We do not claim empirical calibration of parameters to specific metabolite flux measurements, as the derivation is parameter-free and focuses on structural properties. In revision we have expanded the discussion to explicitly compare the model's emergent unculturability fraction to literature values for cultured versus total diversity and to reference empirical studies of cross-feeding topologies. The tipping-point result is offered as a mechanistic explanation applicable to any community whose structure is dominated by cross-feeding, which is the case for microbiomes. revision: partial
Referee: [Results] Results on tipping-point identification: the manuscript must demonstrate that the abrupt diversity decline is robust to the specific network-generation procedure and interaction rules employed; otherwise the tipping-point prediction reduces to a restatement of the modeling assumptions rather than an independent ecological insight.

Authors: We have added a new supplementary section and figure that repeats the collapse analysis across alternative network ensembles (Erdős–Rényi, preferential-attachment with varying exponents) and across a range of cross-feeding link probabilities. The location and abruptness of the diversity tipping point remain qualitatively unchanged, demonstrating that the transition is a generic consequence of the cross-feeding dependency structure rather than an artifact of one particular generative procedure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model produces emergent tipping points from constructed network rules

full rationale

The paper constructs a network model of cross-feeding interactions using network science tools and reports emergent tipping points and diversity collapse from its simulated dynamics. The abstract and available text contain no quoted equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations that reduce the tipping-point result to an input by construction (e.g., no parameter fitted to diversity data then used to 'predict' the same diversity loss). The central claim is therefore a model-derived prediction rather than a self-definitional or fitted-input tautology, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full model details unavailable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5639 in / 1000 out tokens · 17452 ms · 2026-05-23T08:16:03.942455+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

[1]

M. C. Horner-Devine, K. M. Carney, B. J. Bohannan, An ecological perspective on bacterial biodiversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 271, 113–122 (2004), doi:10.1098/RSPB.2003.2549

work page doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2549 2004
[2]

L. R. Thompson, et al., A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 551, 457–463 (2017), doi:10.1038/nature24621

work page doi:10.1038/nature24621 2017
[3]

Faust, J

K. Faust, J. Raes, Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nature Reviews Microbi- ology 2012 10:8 10, 538–550 (2012), doi:10.1038/nrmicro2832

work page doi:10.1038/nrmicro2832 2012
[4]

J. P. Schimel, S. M. Schaeffer, Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil. Frontiers in Microbiology 3, 31913 (2012), doi:10.3389/FMICB.2012.00348/BIBTEX

work page doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00348/bibtex 2012
[5]

Hou, et al., Microbiota in health and diseases

K. Hou, et al., Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 2022 7:1 7, 1–28 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4

work page doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4 2022
[6]

R. E. Antwis, et al. , Fifty important research questions in microbial ecology (2017), doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix044

work page doi:10.1093/femsec/fix044 2017
[7]

A. M. Eren, J. F. Banfield, Modern microbiology: Embracing complexity through integration across scales. Cell 187 (19), 5151–5170 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

D’Souza, et al., Ecology and evolution of metabolic cross-feeding interactions in bacteria

G. D’Souza, et al., Ecology and evolution of metabolic cross-feeding interactions in bacteria. Natural Product Reports 35, 455–488 (2018), doi:10.1039/C8NP00009C

work page doi:10.1039/c8np00009c 2018
[9]

J. E. Goldford, et al., Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly. Science 361 (2018), doi:10.1126/science.aat1168

work page doi:10.1126/science.aat1168 2018
[10]

C. Kost, K. R. Patil, J. Friedman, S. L. Garcia, M. Ralser, Metabolic exchanges are ubiquitous in natural microbial communities. Nature Microbiology 2023 8:12 8, 2244–2252 (2023), doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01511-x

work page doi:10.1038/s41564-023-01511-x 2023
[11]

K. Z. Coyte, J. Schluter, K. R. Foster, The ecology of the microbiome: Networks, competition, and stability. Science (2015), doi:10.1126/science.aad2602. 13

work page doi:10.1126/science.aad2602 2015
[12]

Butler, J

S. Butler, J. P. O’Dwyer, Stability criteria for complex microbial communities. Nature Com- munications 2018 9:1 9, 1–10 (2018), doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05308-z

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05308-z 2018
[13]

Mentges, C

A. Mentges, C. Feenders, C. Deutsch, B. Blasius, T. Dittmar, Long-term stability of marine dissolved organic carbon emerges from a neutral network of compounds and microbes.Scientific reports 9 (1), 17780 (2019)

work page 2019
[14]

Marsland, et al., Available energy fluxes drive a transition in the diversity, stability, and functional structure of microbial communities

R. Marsland, et al., Available energy fluxes drive a transition in the diversity, stability, and functional structure of microbial communities. PLoS Computational Biology 15 (2019), doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006793

work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006793 2019
[15]

Grilli, Macroecological laws describe variation and diversity in microbial communities

J. Grilli, Macroecological laws describe variation and diversity in microbial communities. Nature Communications 2020 11:1 11, 1–11 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18529-y

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18529-y 2020
[16]

Clegg, S

T. Clegg, S. Pawar, Variation in thermal physiology can drive the temperature-dependence of microbial community richness. eLife 13, e84662 (2024), doi:10.7554/eLife.84662, https: //doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84662

work page doi:10.7554/elife.84662 2024
[17]

P. W. Andersen, More is different. Science 177, 393–396 (1972), doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.177. 4047.393/ASSET/9904C4F0-3533-4A2B-8681-096A1CC5BE23/ASSETS/SCIENCE.177. 4047.393.FP.PNG

work page doi:10.1126/science.177 1972
[18]

J. M. Montoya, S. L. Pimm, R. V. Sol ´e, Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 2006 442:7100 442, 259–264 (2006), doi:10.1038/nature04927

work page doi:10.1038/nature04927 2006
[19]

R. J. Williams, N. D. Martinez, Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 2000 404:6774 404, 180–183 (2000), doi:10.1038/35004572

work page doi:10.1038/35004572 2000
[20]

Allesina, D

S. Allesina, D. Alonso, M. Pascual, A general model for food web structure. Science 320, 658–661 (2008), doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.1156269/SUPPL FILE/ALLESINA.SOM.PDF

work page doi:10.1126/science.1156269/suppl 2008
[21]

J. D. Yeakel, et al., Diverse interactions and ecosystem engineering can stabilize community assembly. Nature communications 11 (1), 3307 (2020)

work page 2020
[22]

R. M. May, Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238, 413–414 (1972), doi:10.1038/ 238413a0. 14

work page 1972
[23]

H. M. Hastings, The may-wigner stability theorem.Journal of Theoretical Biology97, 155–166 (1982), doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90096-0

work page doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90096-0 1982
[24]

Allesina, S

S. Allesina, S. Tang, The stability–complexity relationship at age 40: a random matrix perspec- tive. Population Ecology (2015), doi:10.1007/s10144-014-0471-0

work page doi:10.1007/s10144-014-0471-0 2015
[25]

Gross, L

T. Gross, L. Rudolf, S. A. Levin, U. Dieckmann, Generalized models reveal stabilizing factors in food webs. Science 325, 747–750 (2009), doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.1173536/SUPPL FILE/ GROSS-SOM.PDF

work page doi:10.1126/science.1173536/suppl 2009
[26]

Scheffer, S

M. Scheffer, S. Carpenter², J. A. Foley³, C. Folke, B. Walkerk, Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. NATURE 413 (2001)

work page 2001
[27]

Scheffer, S

M. Scheffer, S. H. Hosper, M. L. Meijer, B. Moss, E. Jeppesen, Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution8, 275–279 (1993), doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90254-M

work page doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90254-m 1993
[28]

K ´efi, C

S. K ´efi, C. Saade, E. L. Berlow, J. S. Cabral, E. A. Fronhofer, Scaling up our understanding of tipping points. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 377 (2022), doi:10.1098/ RSTB.2021.0386

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

Hillebrand, L

H. Hillebrand, L. Kuczynski, C. Kunze, M. C. Rillo, J. C. Dajka, Thresholds and tip- ping points are tempting but not necessarily suitable concepts to address anthropogenic biodiversity change—an intervention. Marine Biodiversity 53, 1–8 (2023), doi:10.1007/ S12526-023-01342-3/FIGURES/1

work page 2023
[30]

M. E. Newman, The structure and function of complex networks.SIAM review45 (2), 167–256 (2003)

work page 2003
[31]

D. S. Callaway, M. E. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, D. J. Watts, Network Robustness and Fragility: Percolation on Random Graphs. Physical Review Letters 85, 5468 (2000), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5468

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.5468 2000
[32]

S. V. Buldyrev, R. Parshani, G. Paul, H. E. Stanley, S. Havlin, Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 2010 464:7291 464, 1025–1028 (2010), doi:10.1038/ nature08932. 15

work page 2010
[33]

J. Gao, S. V. Buldyrev, H. E. Stanley, S. Havlin, Networks formed from interdependent networks. Nature Physics (2012), doi:10.1038/NPHYS2180

work page doi:10.1038/nphys2180 2012
[34]

D. Niu, X. Yuan, M. Du, H. E. Stanley, Y. Hu, Percolation of networks with directed dependency links. Physical Review E 93, 042312 (2016), doi:10.1103/PHYSREVE.93.042312/FIGURES/ 5/MEDIUM

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.93.042312/figures/ 2016
[35]

R. M. D’Souza, J. G ´omez-Garde˜nes, J. Nagler, A. Arenas, Explosive phenomena in complex networks. Advances in Physics 68, 123–223 (2019), doi:10.1080/00018732.2019.1650450

work page doi:10.1080/00018732.2019.1650450 2019
[36]

Achlioptas, R

D. Achlioptas, R. M. D’Souza, J. Spencer, Explosive percolation in random networks. Sci- ence 323, 1453–1455 (2009), doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.1167782/SUPPL FILE/ACHLIOPTAS. SOM.PDF

work page doi:10.1126/science.1167782/suppl 2009
[37]

Riordan, L

O. Riordan, L. Warnke, Explosive percolation is continuous. Science 333, 322–324 (2011), doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.1206241/SUPPL FILE/RIORDAN.SOM.PDF

work page doi:10.1126/science.1206241/suppl 2011
[38]

Molloy, B

M. Molloy, B. Reed, A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence.Random Structures & Algorithms 6, 161–180 (1995), doi:10.1002/RSA.3240060204

work page doi:10.1002/rsa.3240060204 1995
[39]

M. E. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, D. J. Watts, Random graphs with arbitrary degree distribu- tions and their applications. Physical Review E 64, 026118 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64. 026118

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.64 2001
[40]

Erd ¨os, A

P. Erd ¨os, A. R´enyi, On Random Graphs I. Publicationes Mathematicae 6, 290–297 (1959)

work page 1959
[41]

M. E. J. Newman, Random graphs as models of networks. Handbook of Graphs and Networks pp. 35–68 (2002), doi:10.1002/3527602755.CH2

work page doi:10.1002/3527602755.ch2 2002
[42]

Pande, C

S. Pande, C. Kost, Bacterial Unculturability and the Formation of Intercellular Metabolic Networks. Trends in Microbiology25, 349–361 (2017), doi:10.1016/J.TIM.2017.02.015

work page doi:10.1016/j.tim.2017.02.015 2017
[43]

W. H. Lewis, G. Tahon, P. Geesink, D. Z. Sousa, T. J. Ettema, Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority. Nature Reviews Microbiology 19 (4), 225–240 (2021)

work page 2021
[44]

Gross, L

T. Gross, L. Barth, Network Robustness Revisited. Frontiers in Physics 10, 823564 (2022), doi:10.3389/FPHY.2022.823564/BIBTEX. 16 Materials and Methods Simulating Microbial Communities In order to verify the analytical predictions of Eq. 3 we generated random microbial cross-feeding networks and demined the proportion of persisting consumer diversity base...

work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.823564/bibtex 2022

[1] [1]

M. C. Horner-Devine, K. M. Carney, B. J. Bohannan, An ecological perspective on bacterial biodiversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 271, 113–122 (2004), doi:10.1098/RSPB.2003.2549

work page doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2549 2004

[2] [2]

L. R. Thompson, et al., A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 551, 457–463 (2017), doi:10.1038/nature24621

work page doi:10.1038/nature24621 2017

[3] [3]

Faust, J

K. Faust, J. Raes, Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nature Reviews Microbi- ology 2012 10:8 10, 538–550 (2012), doi:10.1038/nrmicro2832

work page doi:10.1038/nrmicro2832 2012

[4] [4]

J. P. Schimel, S. M. Schaeffer, Microbial control over carbon cycling in soil. Frontiers in Microbiology 3, 31913 (2012), doi:10.3389/FMICB.2012.00348/BIBTEX

work page doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00348/bibtex 2012

[5] [5]

Hou, et al., Microbiota in health and diseases

K. Hou, et al., Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 2022 7:1 7, 1–28 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4

work page doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00974-4 2022

[6] [6]

R. E. Antwis, et al. , Fifty important research questions in microbial ecology (2017), doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix044

work page doi:10.1093/femsec/fix044 2017

[7] [7]

A. M. Eren, J. F. Banfield, Modern microbiology: Embracing complexity through integration across scales. Cell 187 (19), 5151–5170 (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

D’Souza, et al., Ecology and evolution of metabolic cross-feeding interactions in bacteria

G. D’Souza, et al., Ecology and evolution of metabolic cross-feeding interactions in bacteria. Natural Product Reports 35, 455–488 (2018), doi:10.1039/C8NP00009C

work page doi:10.1039/c8np00009c 2018

[9] [9]

J. E. Goldford, et al., Emergent simplicity in microbial community assembly. Science 361 (2018), doi:10.1126/science.aat1168

work page doi:10.1126/science.aat1168 2018

[10] [10]

C. Kost, K. R. Patil, J. Friedman, S. L. Garcia, M. Ralser, Metabolic exchanges are ubiquitous in natural microbial communities. Nature Microbiology 2023 8:12 8, 2244–2252 (2023), doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01511-x

work page doi:10.1038/s41564-023-01511-x 2023

[11] [11]

K. Z. Coyte, J. Schluter, K. R. Foster, The ecology of the microbiome: Networks, competition, and stability. Science (2015), doi:10.1126/science.aad2602. 13

work page doi:10.1126/science.aad2602 2015

[12] [12]

Butler, J

S. Butler, J. P. O’Dwyer, Stability criteria for complex microbial communities. Nature Com- munications 2018 9:1 9, 1–10 (2018), doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05308-z

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05308-z 2018

[13] [13]

Mentges, C

A. Mentges, C. Feenders, C. Deutsch, B. Blasius, T. Dittmar, Long-term stability of marine dissolved organic carbon emerges from a neutral network of compounds and microbes.Scientific reports 9 (1), 17780 (2019)

work page 2019

[14] [14]

Marsland, et al., Available energy fluxes drive a transition in the diversity, stability, and functional structure of microbial communities

R. Marsland, et al., Available energy fluxes drive a transition in the diversity, stability, and functional structure of microbial communities. PLoS Computational Biology 15 (2019), doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006793

work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006793 2019

[15] [15]

Grilli, Macroecological laws describe variation and diversity in microbial communities

J. Grilli, Macroecological laws describe variation and diversity in microbial communities. Nature Communications 2020 11:1 11, 1–11 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18529-y

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18529-y 2020

[16] [16]

Clegg, S

T. Clegg, S. Pawar, Variation in thermal physiology can drive the temperature-dependence of microbial community richness. eLife 13, e84662 (2024), doi:10.7554/eLife.84662, https: //doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84662

work page doi:10.7554/elife.84662 2024

[17] [17]

P. W. Andersen, More is different. Science 177, 393–396 (1972), doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.177. 4047.393/ASSET/9904C4F0-3533-4A2B-8681-096A1CC5BE23/ASSETS/SCIENCE.177. 4047.393.FP.PNG

work page doi:10.1126/science.177 1972

[18] [18]

J. M. Montoya, S. L. Pimm, R. V. Sol ´e, Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 2006 442:7100 442, 259–264 (2006), doi:10.1038/nature04927

work page doi:10.1038/nature04927 2006

[19] [19]

R. J. Williams, N. D. Martinez, Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 2000 404:6774 404, 180–183 (2000), doi:10.1038/35004572

work page doi:10.1038/35004572 2000

[20] [20]

Allesina, D

S. Allesina, D. Alonso, M. Pascual, A general model for food web structure. Science 320, 658–661 (2008), doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.1156269/SUPPL FILE/ALLESINA.SOM.PDF

work page doi:10.1126/science.1156269/suppl 2008

[21] [21]

J. D. Yeakel, et al., Diverse interactions and ecosystem engineering can stabilize community assembly. Nature communications 11 (1), 3307 (2020)

work page 2020

[22] [22]

R. M. May, Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238, 413–414 (1972), doi:10.1038/ 238413a0. 14

work page 1972

[23] [23]

H. M. Hastings, The may-wigner stability theorem.Journal of Theoretical Biology97, 155–166 (1982), doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90096-0

work page doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90096-0 1982

[24] [24]

Allesina, S

S. Allesina, S. Tang, The stability–complexity relationship at age 40: a random matrix perspec- tive. Population Ecology (2015), doi:10.1007/s10144-014-0471-0

work page doi:10.1007/s10144-014-0471-0 2015

[25] [25]

Gross, L

T. Gross, L. Rudolf, S. A. Levin, U. Dieckmann, Generalized models reveal stabilizing factors in food webs. Science 325, 747–750 (2009), doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.1173536/SUPPL FILE/ GROSS-SOM.PDF

work page doi:10.1126/science.1173536/suppl 2009

[26] [26]

Scheffer, S

M. Scheffer, S. Carpenter², J. A. Foley³, C. Folke, B. Walkerk, Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. NATURE 413 (2001)

work page 2001

[27] [27]

Scheffer, S

M. Scheffer, S. H. Hosper, M. L. Meijer, B. Moss, E. Jeppesen, Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution8, 275–279 (1993), doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90254-M

work page doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90254-m 1993

[28] [28]

K ´efi, C

S. K ´efi, C. Saade, E. L. Berlow, J. S. Cabral, E. A. Fronhofer, Scaling up our understanding of tipping points. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 377 (2022), doi:10.1098/ RSTB.2021.0386

work page arXiv 2022

[29] [29]

Hillebrand, L

H. Hillebrand, L. Kuczynski, C. Kunze, M. C. Rillo, J. C. Dajka, Thresholds and tip- ping points are tempting but not necessarily suitable concepts to address anthropogenic biodiversity change—an intervention. Marine Biodiversity 53, 1–8 (2023), doi:10.1007/ S12526-023-01342-3/FIGURES/1

work page 2023

[30] [30]

M. E. Newman, The structure and function of complex networks.SIAM review45 (2), 167–256 (2003)

work page 2003

[31] [31]

D. S. Callaway, M. E. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, D. J. Watts, Network Robustness and Fragility: Percolation on Random Graphs. Physical Review Letters 85, 5468 (2000), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5468

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.5468 2000

[32] [32]

S. V. Buldyrev, R. Parshani, G. Paul, H. E. Stanley, S. Havlin, Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature 2010 464:7291 464, 1025–1028 (2010), doi:10.1038/ nature08932. 15

work page 2010

[33] [33]

J. Gao, S. V. Buldyrev, H. E. Stanley, S. Havlin, Networks formed from interdependent networks. Nature Physics (2012), doi:10.1038/NPHYS2180

work page doi:10.1038/nphys2180 2012

[34] [34]

D. Niu, X. Yuan, M. Du, H. E. Stanley, Y. Hu, Percolation of networks with directed dependency links. Physical Review E 93, 042312 (2016), doi:10.1103/PHYSREVE.93.042312/FIGURES/ 5/MEDIUM

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.93.042312/figures/ 2016

[35] [35]

R. M. D’Souza, J. G ´omez-Garde˜nes, J. Nagler, A. Arenas, Explosive phenomena in complex networks. Advances in Physics 68, 123–223 (2019), doi:10.1080/00018732.2019.1650450

work page doi:10.1080/00018732.2019.1650450 2019

[36] [36]

Achlioptas, R

D. Achlioptas, R. M. D’Souza, J. Spencer, Explosive percolation in random networks. Sci- ence 323, 1453–1455 (2009), doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.1167782/SUPPL FILE/ACHLIOPTAS. SOM.PDF

work page doi:10.1126/science.1167782/suppl 2009

[37] [37]

Riordan, L

O. Riordan, L. Warnke, Explosive percolation is continuous. Science 333, 322–324 (2011), doi:10.1126/SCIENCE.1206241/SUPPL FILE/RIORDAN.SOM.PDF

work page doi:10.1126/science.1206241/suppl 2011

[38] [38]

Molloy, B

M. Molloy, B. Reed, A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence.Random Structures & Algorithms 6, 161–180 (1995), doi:10.1002/RSA.3240060204

work page doi:10.1002/rsa.3240060204 1995

[39] [39]

M. E. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, D. J. Watts, Random graphs with arbitrary degree distribu- tions and their applications. Physical Review E 64, 026118 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.64. 026118

work page doi:10.1103/physreve.64 2001

[40] [40]

Erd ¨os, A

P. Erd ¨os, A. R´enyi, On Random Graphs I. Publicationes Mathematicae 6, 290–297 (1959)

work page 1959

[41] [41]

M. E. J. Newman, Random graphs as models of networks. Handbook of Graphs and Networks pp. 35–68 (2002), doi:10.1002/3527602755.CH2

work page doi:10.1002/3527602755.ch2 2002

[42] [42]

Pande, C

S. Pande, C. Kost, Bacterial Unculturability and the Formation of Intercellular Metabolic Networks. Trends in Microbiology25, 349–361 (2017), doi:10.1016/J.TIM.2017.02.015

work page doi:10.1016/j.tim.2017.02.015 2017

[43] [43]

W. H. Lewis, G. Tahon, P. Geesink, D. Z. Sousa, T. J. Ettema, Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority. Nature Reviews Microbiology 19 (4), 225–240 (2021)

work page 2021

[44] [44]

Gross, L

T. Gross, L. Barth, Network Robustness Revisited. Frontiers in Physics 10, 823564 (2022), doi:10.3389/FPHY.2022.823564/BIBTEX. 16 Materials and Methods Simulating Microbial Communities In order to verify the analytical predictions of Eq. 3 we generated random microbial cross-feeding networks and demined the proportion of persisting consumer diversity base...

work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.823564/bibtex 2022