Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 49 references

A Decision Support System for Stock Selection and Asset Allocation Based on Fundamental Data Analysis

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A decision support system that models fundamental financial-report data as a classification against fixed-income ETF returns reaches 70% test accuracy on the Tehran Stock Exchange and generates stock/bond/gold allocation strategies with…

desk verdict A workmanlike applied DSS paper whose comparative claim overstates what the experiments show; the out-of-sample TSE result is worth a second look. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05297 v1 pith:EZHXF5E6 submitted 2024-11-24 q-fin.ST

Ali Abrishami , Jafar Habibi , AmirAli Jarrahi , Dariush Amiri , MohammadAmin Fazli This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-fin.ST
keywords StockPredictionFundamentalAnalysisDecisionSupportSystemsAssetAllocationFinancialMarketsTehranExchangeRatiosHighInflationEconomies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that an end-to-end pipeline for collecting, cleaning, and modeling fundamental financial-report data can predict which stocks on the Tehran Stock Exchange will outperform a fixed-income ETF over horizons of one to twelve months, and that this prediction can drive a simple asset-allocation rule across stock, bond, and gold ETFs. The proposed neural-network classifier, trained on financial ratios, stock-type indicators, trading activity, and macroeconomic variables, reaches 70% average test accuracy, compared with 58%, 62%, and 50% for three baseline feature sets drawn from prior fundamental-analysis studies when each is fed to the same generic network. In a twenty-stock portfolio experiment over the test period, the method's cumulative return is reported to exceed those of the baselines and of the stock market, equal-weight index, and gold fund. A sympathetic reader would care because the work addresses a practical investor need: mid- to long-term stock selection in a high-inflation emerging market, using the kind of semi-structured report data that many prediction studies avoid.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the classification target itself: label a stock as 1 if its return beats the fixed-income ETF over the forecast horizon, with the ETF's monthly outside-option return computed as $(1+\mathrm{YTM})^{1/12}-1$. This target encodes an investor's alternative—a low-risk bond-like return—so the model learns relative attractiveness rather than absolute price. Around it sits a feature set of 23 financial ratios, including gross profit growth and revenue growth, plus stock-type indicators, trading-activity measures, and macroeconomic variables such as the USD/IRR exchange rate, gold return, government bond return, and market index return. The market-direction signal aggregates per-stock probabilities weighted by market capitalization, and the allocation rule thresholds that signal at 50%.

What would settle it

Run the original methods behind the three cited baseline studies—their actual regressions, network architectures, and training procedures, not just their feature lists—on the same 413-stock Tehran Stock Exchange dataset and forecast horizon, and count their average test accuracy and cumulative portfolio return. If any of those original models matches or exceeds the proposed method's 70% test accuracy or its cumulative portfolio return, the paper's central claim of superiority to prior research fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the discovery is that a classification problem—will a stock's return over the next one to twelve months exceed the return of a fixed-income ETF, computed from yield to maturity as $(1+\mathrm{YTM})^{1/12}-1$—is a more learnable and more decision-relevant formulation than the raw-return regression used in prior fundamental-ratio studies. Using 413 Tehran Stock Exchange stocks from 2015 to 2024, with report publication lagged one month to simulate real-world timing, the authors train a one-hidden-layer neural network with 100 neurons on 23 financial ratios plus stock-type, trading, and macroeconomic features. They report 70% average test accuracy against 58%, 62%, and 50% for the baselines, and better cumulative returns for a portfolio that periodically selects the twenty highest-probability stocks. They also derive a market-level probability by market-cap weighting the per-stock probabilities, and use that signal to switch between a 70/10/20 stock/bond/gold allocation and a 10/70/20 allocation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the comparison setup—feeding each prior paper's listed features into the same generic neural network—fairly represents those papers' true predictive power; if the original methods were rerun on the same Tehran Stock Exchange data, the reported gap could shrink or reverse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On the Tehran Stock Exchange test period, the model's 70% test accuracy means a simple rule—buy stocks whose predicted beat-the-ETF probability exceeds 50%, otherwise hold fixed-income ETFs—would have selected the better asset class in most quarters.
  • The market-cap-weighted market probability can act as a leading indicator: the paper's Figure 7 shows the predicted probability dropping to single digits in several quarters of market weakness.
  • The twenty-stock portfolio built from the model's top predictions realized higher cumulative nominal and real returns than the aggregate market index, the equal-weight index, or the gold fund over the 2022–2024 test window.
  • The asset-allocation strategies produce positive real returns under high inflation because capital shifts to fixed-income and gold when the predicted market probability falls below 50%, and back to stocks when it rises above 50%.
  • Because the target embeds the fixed-income outside option, the same architecture could be applied directly to any market where low-risk bond or deposit returns define the investor's benchmark, not just to high-inflation economies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not run the original baseline models on the Tehran data—it feeds each prior paper's listed features into the same generic neural network—so the reported superiority should be read as a claim about the feature set and classification formulation, not about the full pipeline versus the original methods.
  • A direct ablation the paper does not report—removing the macroeconomic feature category, or removing the trading-activity category, and re-measuring test accuracy—would quantify which part of the 70% edge comes from macro variables such as USD/IRR and gold returns versus from financial ratios alone.
  • The asset-allocation results come from a single test window in which global gold prices were rising, and the strategy always keeps 20% in gold; the real-return advantage over gold may not survive a stable or falling gold regime.
  • The classification target against fixed-income returns likely transfers to other high-inflation and emerging markets, but its advantage may shrink in low-inflation markets where the bond outside option is less central to stock selection.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a decision support system (DSS) for stock selection and asset allocation on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The system collects, cleans, and integrates fundamental reports, stock trading features, and macroeconomic indicators, then trains a one-hidden-layer neural network to predict whether a stock will beat the fixed-income ETF return over horizons of 1 to 12 months. The authors compare this model against feature sets from three cited fundamental-analysis studies and against five classical classifiers, and they further use the stock-level predictions to construct a market-direction probability and two asset-allocation strategies (70/20/10 and 10/70/20 across stocks, gold, and bonds). The central claims are that the proposed method has higher test accuracy than the baselines (70% vs 58%, 62%, 50% in Table 6) and that the asset-allocation strategies outperform the market index, gold, and baseline portfolios in the test period.

Significance. If the comparative results were properly established, the paper would make a useful applied contribution for high-inflation, medium-sized equity markets: the end-to-end data pipeline is substantial, the feature set is broad and domain-relevant, the problem formulation against a fixed-income hurdle is sensible for investors, and the evaluation in both nominal and real terms is appropriate. The authors also correctly incorporate the one-month reporting lag, which strengthens the simulation's realism. However, the evidence currently does not support the headline superiority claim because the baselines are not implemented as the original methods, and no uncertainty quantification is given. The asset-allocation module also lacks out-of-sample validation of its handpicked threshold and weights. The underlying system is promising, but the paper needs major strengthening before its central claims can be accepted.

major comments (5)
  1. [§5.5, Tables 5–6] The comparison does not implement the cited baseline methods. The text states that baselines were formed by 'using their features and training a model for stock prediction,' meaning each cited feature set is fed to the authors' own one-hidden-layer ANN. Tsai et al.'s regression model, Abe et al.'s deep-learning regression with a one-month horizon, and Arkan's specific procedure are not reproduced. Therefore Tables 5 and 6 show the predictive content of feature sets under a common model class, not the superiority of the proposed method over prior approaches. The abstract and conclusion claim 'superiority to novel researches'; this claim must either be re-stated as a feature-set comparison or supported by running the original methods on the same TSE data.
  2. [§5.5, Table 5] No uncertainty quantification is reported. All accuracies come from a single chronological split, with no confidence intervals, bootstrap, repeated seeds, or significance tests. At the 1-month horizon the proposed method (64%) is actually below Baseline-2 (70%), and several differences in Table 5 are in the 1–4 percentage-point range. The headline test-accuracy gap of 70% vs 58–62% could be within sampling noise. Please report means and standard deviations over multiple runs and a paired significance test (e.g., McNemar) on the same test instances.
  3. [§5.2, Eq. (1) and §5.3] The label construction is under-specified. Formula (1) defines the monthly fixed-income return, but the classification horizon varies from 1 to 12 months (Table 5). The paper does not state how the fixed-income hurdle is compounded over the prediction horizon or how overlapping quarterly report dates are handled for multi-month labels. This is load-bearing because the class labels are defined by comparing stock returns with this hurdle. Please give the exact label rule for every horizon.
  4. [§6.1–6.2, Table 7, Figs. 10–11] The asset-allocation module has no out-of-sample validation of its decision rule. The 50% probability threshold and the 70/20/10 and 10/70/20 weights are presented as fixed choices; no procedure for selecting them or sensitivity analysis is given. The test period is a single 27-month window, and Figures 10–11 show cumulative results without transaction costs, fees, or rebalancing frictions. The claim that the strategy outperforms gold and market indices therefore needs robustness checks (e.g., varying the threshold and weights, adding costs), or it should be presented as an illustrative simulation rather than as a validated result.
  5. [§6.1, Figure 7] The market-direction predictor is evaluated only visually. Figure 7 plots the TSE index against predicted probabilities, and the text says 'the model performance is good', but no quantitative accuracy, hit rate, or comparison to a random or naive benchmark is given for the aggregate market prediction. Because the asset-allocation strategies in §6.2 are triggered by this prediction, this performance measure should be made explicit and statistically evaluated.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§5.3] The sentence 'the adopted model is a an artificial neural network' contains a typo and should be rephrased.
  2. [Table 1] The Beta formula is given as Cov(Rm,Rs)/Var(Rs); the standard definition is Cov(Rm,Rs)/Var(Rm). If the feature was computed with the printed formula, this should be corrected or clarified.
  3. [§5.5, Table 5] It is unclear whether the columns of Table 5 are averages over all test symbols and periods or macro-averages; please define how the accuracy is aggregated.
  4. [§6.2, Figures 10–11] The legends refer to 'Proposed method' for both the stock-selection portfolio and the asset-allocation strategy; please clarify which series corresponds to which strategy.
  5. [§5.1, Table 2] The 'Stock Market Exchange' feature appears in the feature list, but all data come from the Tehran Stock Exchange; explain why this feature is not constant or remove it.
  6. [General] The paper does not provide a data-availability statement, code, or a reproducibility appendix; given the specialized data pipeline, this would substantially increase the value of the submission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the predictions are evaluated out-of-sample and are not constructed from the fitted constants.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The prediction target (stock return exceeding fixed-income ETF return) is defined independently in Section 5.2 via Eq. (1), the model is trained on the earliest 75% of the data and tested on the remaining 25% (Section 5.4), and the market-direction probability P(market) in Eq. (3) is a cap-weighted aggregation of the same model's out-of-sample stock-level probabilities rather than an input to the training objective. The asset-allocation scenarios in Table 7 are decision rules keyed to the P(market) threshold, not quantities derived from or fitted to the test labels; the 70/20/10 weights are stated as assumptions rather than predictions, so no equation equates an output to a fitted constant. The baseline comparison in Section 5.5 reimplements each cited paper using its feature set with a generic neural network, which is a validity threat to the comparative claim but is not circular: it does not define the proposed method's accuracy in terms of the baselines' outputs. No load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems appear, and the central accuracy claims are measured against held-out test data rather than being forced by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes an empirical pipeline; its central claim rests on the integrity of the financial report data, the assumption that past fundamentals predict future returns, and the stipulated baseline implementation. It introduces no formal free parameters beyond the hand-picked model and allocation settings.

free parameters (3)
  • Asset allocation weights = Gold 20%, Bond 10%/70%, Stock 70%/10%
    Handpicked in Table 7; not derived from an optimization or utility model, likely chosen after test-period results.
  • Market probability threshold = 50%
    The two scenarios in Section 6.2 split at P(market) = 50%; this threshold is arbitrary and no sensitivity analysis is given.
  • Model hyperparameters = 100 hidden neurons, 50 epochs, batch size 32
    Chosen in Section 5.3 without tuning or validation; they affect accuracy but are not fitted to the test set in a systematic way.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Financial reports filed by TSE companies are accurate and reflect true business performance.
    The whole DSS depends on the integrity of this data; no accounting-quality check is performed.
  • domain assumption Past fundamental and macro features contain predictive information about future returns, i.e., markets are not fully efficient.
    Assumed implicitly throughout; the paper does not test this assumption beyond the reported accuracy, which could be spurious.
  • ad hoc to paper The baselines are faithfully represented by feeding their feature sets into a generic ANN.
    Section 5.5: 'using their features and training a model for stock prediction'. This does not reproduce the original models, so the comparison is a feature comparison, not a method comparison.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Decision Support System for Stock Selection and Asset Allocation Based on Fundamental Data Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EZHXF5E6

@misc{pith2026241205297,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Decision Support System for Stock Selection and Asset Allocation Based on Fundamental Data Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EZHXF5E6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05297}
}
read the original abstract

Financial markets are integral to a country's economic success, yet their complex nature raises challenging issues for predicting their behaviors. There is a growing demand for an integrated system that explores the vast and diverse data in financial reports with powerful machine-learning models to analyze financial markets and suggest appropriate investment strategies. This research provides an end-to-end decision support system (DSS) that pervasively covers the stages of gathering, cleaning, and modeling the stock's financial and fundamental data alongside the country's macroeconomic conditions. Analyzing and modeling the fundamental data of securities is a noteworthy method that, despite its greater power, has been used by fewer researchers due to its more complex and challenging issues. By precisely analyzing securities' fundamental data, the proposed system assists investors in predicting stock future prices and allocating assets in major financial markets: stock, bond, and commodity. The most notable contributions and innovations of this research are: (1) Developing a robust predictive model for mid- to long-term stock returns, tailored for investors rather than traders, (2) The proposed DSS considers a diverse set of features relating to the economic conditions of the company, including fundamental data, stock trading characteristics, and macro-economic attributes to enhance predictive accuracy, (3) Evaluating the DSS performance on the Tehran Stock Exchange that has specific characteristics of small to medium-sized economies with high inflation rates and showing the superiority to novel researches, and (4) Empowering the DSS to generate different asset allocation strategies in various economic situations by simulating expert investor decision-making.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05297 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Proposed system architecture and choosing the best stocks based on their current state. One important step is the process of preparing the feature set. The collected feature set represents a profile of the business and its trading behavior along with the macroeconomic and market factors for a complete representation of the real world. We will describe this in detail in the following subsection. 5.1 Building feature … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of features by feature type [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Industry share of total market symbols 2.1% 2.3% 3.0% 3.4% 3.9% 9.2% 11.4% 17.6% 18.2% 28.9% Utilities Food & Beverages Telecommunications Cement & Lime Pharmaceuticals Automobiles & Components Others Oil Refining & Energy Chemicals Basic Metals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Market capitalization distribution across industry sectors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Methods return in three month periods -50.00% 0.00% 50.00% 100.00% 150.00% 200.00% 250.00% 2022-07 2022-10 2023-01 2023-04 2023-07 2023-10 2024-01 2024-04 2024-07 2024-10 Baseline-1 Baseline-2 Baseline-3 Proposed method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Cumulative return of methods in test period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Predicted probabilities for market return exceed fixed-income return [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Three months nominal return of strategies in test period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Three months real return of strategies in test period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Cumulative nominal return of strategies in test period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Cumulative real return of strategies in test period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Deep learning for forecasting stock returns in the cross-section

    Masaya Abe and Hideki Nakayama. Deep learning for forecasting stock returns in the cross-section. In Dinh Phung, Vincent S. Tseng, Geoffrey I. Webb, Bao Ho, Mohadeseh Ganji, and Lida Rashidi, editors, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , pages 273–284, Cham, 2018. Springer International Publishing

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    An im- proved densenet model for prediction of stock market using stock technical indicators

    Saleh Albahli, Tahira Nazir, Marriam Nawaz, and Aun Irtaza. An im- proved densenet model for prediction of stock market using stock technical indicators. Expert Systems with Applications , 232:120903, 2023. 22

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    The importance of financial ratios in predicting stock price trends: A case study in emerging markets

    Thomas Arkan. The importance of financial ratios in predicting stock price trends: A case study in emerging markets. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, (79):13–26, 2016

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    An empirical evaluation of accounting in- come numbers

    Ray Ball and Philip Brown. An empirical evaluation of accounting in- come numbers. In Financial Accounting and Equity Markets , pages 27–46. Routledge, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Evaluating multiple classifiers for stock price direction prediction

    Michel Ballings, Dirk Van den Poel, Nathalie Hespeels, and Ruben Gryp. Evaluating multiple classifiers for stock price direction prediction. Expert Systems with Applications , 42(20):7046–7056, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Lstm based decision support system for swing trading in stock market

    Shouvik Banik, Nonita Sharma, Monika Mangla, Sachi Nandan Mohanty, and Shitharth S. Lstm based decision support system for swing trading in stock market. Knowledge-Based Systems, 239:107994, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Dahal, and Rajendra K.C

    Hum Nath Bhandari, Binod Rimal, Nawa Raj Pokhrel, Ramchandra Rimal, Keshab R. Dahal, and Rajendra K.C. Khatri. Predicting stock market index using lstm. Machine Learning with Applications , 9:100320, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Understand- ing inflation-indexed bond markets

    John Y Campbell, Robert J Shiller, Luis M Viceira, et al. Understand- ing inflation-indexed bond markets . Number w15014. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, MA, 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    An adaptive stock index trading decision support system

    Wen-Chyuan Chiang, David Enke, Tong Wu, and Renzhong Wang. An adaptive stock index trading decision support system. Expert Systems with Applications, 59:195–207, 2016

    2016

  2. [10]

    Mismis – a comprehensive decision support system for stock market investment

    Vincent Cho. Mismis – a comprehensive decision support system for stock market investment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 23(6):626–633, 2010

    2010

  3. [11]

    Predictability of stock returns using neural networks: Elusive in the long term

    Adam Chudziak. Predictability of stock returns using neural networks: Elusive in the long term. Expert Systems with Applications , 213:119203, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Investment strategies applied to the brazilian stock market: A methodology based on sentiment analysis with deep learning

    Arthur Emanuel de Oliveira Carosia, Guilherme Palermo Coelho, and Ana Estela Antunes da Silva. Investment strategies applied to the brazilian stock market: A methodology based on sentiment analysis with deep learning. Expert Systems with Applications , 184:115470, 2021

    2021

  5. [13]

    Distilling wisdom of crowds in online communities: A novel prediction market constructed with comment posters

    Li Dong, Haichao Zheng, Liting Li, and Chunyu Zhou. Distilling wisdom of crowds in online communities: A novel prediction market constructed with comment posters. Decision Support Systems , 180:114190, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Asset allocation: From markowitz to deep reinforcement learning, 2022

    Ricard Durall. Asset allocation: From markowitz to deep reinforcement learning, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    A survey of decision support system applications (1995–2001)

    Sean Eom and E Kim. A survey of decision support system applications (1995–2001). Journal of the Operational Research Society , 57(11):1264– 1278, 2006. 23

    1995

  8. [16]

    Efficient capital markets

    Eugene F Fama. Efficient capital markets. Journal of finance , 25(2):383– 417, 1970

    1970

  9. [17]

    Bond markets and economic growth

    Gerhard Fink, Peter R Haiss, and Sirma Hristoforova. Bond markets and economic growth. 2003

    2003

  10. [18]

    Security analysis, volume 452

    Benjamin Graham, David Le Fevre Dodd, Sidney Cottle, et al. Security analysis, volume 452. McGraw-Hill New York, 1934

    1934

  11. [19]

    The intelligent investor

    Benjamin Graham and Bill McGowan. The intelligent investor . Harper Collins New York, 2005

    2005

  12. [20]

    Feature selection for stock market analysis

    Yuqinq He, Kamaladdin Fataliyev, and Lipo Wang. Feature selection for stock market analysis. In Minho Lee, Akira Hirose, Zeng-Guang Hou, and Rhee Man Kil, editors, Neural Information Processing, pages 737–744, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. Springer Berlin Heidelberg

    2013

  13. [21]

    Survey of feature selection and extraction techniques for stock market prediction

    Htet Htet Htun, Michael Biehl, and Nicolai Petkov. Survey of feature selection and extraction techniques for stock market prediction. Financial Innovation, 9(1):26, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    A hybrid model integrating deep learning with investor sentiment analysis for stock price prediction

    Nan Jing, Zhao Wu, and Hefei Wang. A hybrid model integrating deep learning with investor sentiment analysis for stock price prediction. Expert Systems with Applications , 178:115019, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Stock return predictabil- ity with financial ratios

    Sina Kheradyar, Izani Ibrahim, and F Mat Nor. Stock return predictabil- ity with financial ratios. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 2(5):391, 2011

    2011

  16. [24]

    Machine learning techniques and data for stock market forecasting: A literature review

    Mahinda Mailagaha Kumbure, Christoph Lohrmann, Pasi Luukka, and Jari Porras. Machine learning techniques and data for stock market forecasting: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications , 197:116659, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    A decision support system for the stock market through integration of fuzzy neural networks and fuzzy delphi

    Ren Jie Kuo. A decision support system for the stock market through integration of fuzzy neural networks and fuzzy delphi. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 12(6):501–520, 1998

    1998

  18. [26]

    A hybrid decision support system for adap- tive trading strategies: Combining a rule-based expert system with a deep reinforcement learning strategy

    Yuhee Kwon and Zoonky Lee. A hybrid decision support system for adap- tive trading strategies: Combining a rule-based expert system with a deep reinforcement learning strategy. Decision Support Systems , 177:114100, 2024

    2024

  19. [27]

    Stock markets, banks, and economic growth

    Ross Levine and Sara Zervos. Stock markets, banks, and economic growth. American economic review, pages 537–558, 1998

    1998

  20. [28]

    Stock market forecasting using deep learning and technical analysis: A systematic review

    Audeliano Wolian Li and Guilherme Sousa Bastos. Stock market forecasting using deep learning and technical analysis: A systematic review. IEEE Access, 8:185232–185242, 2020. 24

    2020

  21. [29]

    Stock market predic- tion using artificial intelligence: A systematic review of systematic reviews

    Chin Yang Lin and Jo˜ ao Alexandre Lobo Marques. Stock market predic- tion using artificial intelligence: A systematic review of systematic reviews. Social Sciences & Humanities Open , 9:100864, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    A random walk down wall street: including a life-cycle guide to personal investing, 1999

    BG Malkiel. A random walk down wall street: including a life-cycle guide to personal investing, 1999

    1999

  23. [31]

    The elements of Investing

    Burton G Malkiel and Charles D Ellis. The elements of Investing . John Wiley & Sons, 2009

    2009

  24. [32]

    Financial appli- cations of machine learning: A literature review

    Noella Nazareth and Yeruva Venkata Ramana Reddy. Financial appli- cations of machine learning: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 219:119640, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Combining lstm and cnn methods and fundamental analysis for stock price trend prediction.Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(12):17769–17799, 2023

    Zahra Nourbakhsh and Narges Habibi. Combining lstm and cnn methods and fundamental analysis for stock price trend prediction.Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(12):17769–17799, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    A systematic review of fundamental and technical analysis of stock market predictions

    Isaac Kofi Nti, Adebayo Felix Adekoya, and Benjamin Asubam Weyori. A systematic review of fundamental and technical analysis of stock market predictions. Artificial Intelligence Review , 53(4):3007–3057, 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    Deep learning in the stock mar- ket—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications

    Kenniy Olorunnimbe and Herna Viktor. Deep learning in the stock mar- ket—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications. Artifi- cial Intelligence Review , 56(3):2057–2109, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Institutional and individual investors: Saving for old age

    Steven Ongena and Anna (Ania) Zalewska. Institutional and individual investors: Saving for old age. Journal of Banking & Finance , 92:257–268, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Comparative analysis between the fundamental and technical analysis of stocks

    Nada Petrusheva and Igor Jordanoski. Comparative analysis between the fundamental and technical analysis of stocks. Journal of Process Manage- ment. New Technologies, 4(2):26–31, 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    Applying machine learning algorithms to predict the stock price trend in the stock market–the case of vietnam

    Tran Phuoc, Pham Thi Kim Anh, Phan Huy Tam, and Chien V Nguyen. Applying machine learning algorithms to predict the stock price trend in the stock market–the case of vietnam. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1):1–18, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Akhter Mohiuddin Rather, Arun Agarwal, and V.N. Sastry. Recurrent neural network and a hybrid model for prediction of stock returns. Expert Systems with Applications , 42(6):3234–3241, 2015

    2015

  32. [40]

    Financial time series forecasting with deep learning: A systematic literature review: 2005–2019

    Omer Berat Sezer, Mehmet Ugur Gudelek, and Ahmet Murat Ozbayoglu. Financial time series forecasting with deep learning: A systematic literature review: 2005–2019. Applied soft computing , 90:106181, 2020

    2005

  33. [41]

    Salas, and Raymundo D ´ ıaz

    Efrain Solares, V ´ ıctor De-Le´ on-G´ omez, Francisco G. Salas, and Raymundo D ´ ıaz. A comprehensive decision support system for stock investment deci- sions. Expert Systems with Applications , 210:118485, 2022. 25

    2022

  34. [42]

    Forecast- ing stock market indices using padding-based fourier transform denoising and time series deep learning models

    Donghwan Song, Adrian Matias Chung Baek, and Namhun Kim. Forecast- ing stock market indices using padding-based fourier transform denoising and time series deep learning models. IEEE Access, 9:83786–83796, 2021

    2021

  35. [43]

    Deep architectures for long-term stock price prediction with a heuristic- based strategy for trading simulations

    Catalin Stoean, Wies law Paja, Ruxandra Stoean, and Adrian Sandita. Deep architectures for long-term stock price prediction with a heuristic- based strategy for trading simulations. PloS one , 14(10):e0223593, 2019

    2019

  36. [44]

    Combining multiple feature selection methods for stock prediction: Union, intersection, and multi-intersection approaches

    Chih-Fong Tsai and Yu-Chieh Hsiao. Combining multiple feature selection methods for stock prediction: Union, intersection, and multi-intersection approaches. Decision support systems , 50(1):258–269, 2010

    2010

  37. [45]

    Stock selection using machine learning based on financial ratios

    Pei-Fen Tsai, Cheng-Han Gao, and Shyan-Ming Yuan. Stock selection using machine learning based on financial ratios. Mathematics, 11(23):4758, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Asset allocation

    Jessica A Wachter. Asset allocation. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. , 2(1):175– 206, 2010

    2010

  39. [47]

    Robert Yu, and Huimin Zhao

    Tao Yang, T. Robert Yu, and Huimin Zhao. Uncovering the relationship be- tween incidental emotion toward a disaster and stock market fluctuations: Evidence from the us market. Decision Support Systems, 181:114213, 2024

    2024

  40. [48]

    Deep learning models for price forecasting of financial time series: A review of recent advancements: 2020–2022

    Cheng Zhang, Nilam Nur Amir Sjarif, and Roslina Ibrahim. Deep learning models for price forecasting of financial time series: A review of recent advancements: 2020–2022. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 14(1):e1519, 2024

    2020

  41. [49]

    A novel deep reinforce- ment learning based automated stock trading system using cascaded lstm networks

    Jie Zou, Jiashu Lou, Baohua Wang, and Sixue Liu. A novel deep reinforce- ment learning based automated stock trading system using cascaded lstm networks. Expert Systems with Applications , 242:122801, 2024. 26

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.