REVIEW 1 cited by
Clique covers and decompositions of cliques of graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In 1966, Erd\H{o}s, Goodman, and P\'{o}sa showed that if $G$ is an $n$-vertex graph, then at most $\lfloor n^2/4 \rfloor$ cliques of $G$ are needed to cover the edges of $G$, and the bound is best possible as witnessed by the balanced complete bipartite graph. This was generalized independently by Gy\H{o}ri--Kostochka, Kahn, and Chung, who showed that every $n$-vertex graph admits an edge-decomposition into cliques of total `cost' at most $2 \lfloor n^2/4 \rfloor$, where an $i$-vertex clique has cost $i$. Erd\H{o}s suggested the following strengthening: every $n$-vertex graph admits an edge-decomposition into cliques of total cost at most $\lfloor n^2/4 \rfloor$, where now an $i$-vertex clique has cost $i-1$. We prove fractional relaxations and asymptotically optimal versions of both this conjecture and a conjecture of Dau, Milenkovic, and Puleo on covering the $t$-vertex cliques of a graph instead of the edges. Our proofs introduce a general framework for these problems using Zykov symmetrization, the Frankl-R\"odl nibble method, and the Szemer\'edi Regularity Lemma.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the $4$-clique cover number of graphs
For every n-vertex graph G, the 4-clique cover number of G is at most that of the Turán graph T_{n,4}, confirming the t=4 case of the Dau-Milenkovic-Puleo conjecture.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.