Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking?

As of 14 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 69 of 69 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2412.05753.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2412.05753 v1

Coverage vector

measured 69 of 69 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.634640Z

measured 71 of 71 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-10T23:06:54.150295Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-21T10:50:01.548229Z

Reference resolution

69 of 69 outbound references displayed

verified exact2
verified fuzzy65
unresolved2
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation d0cd9164-f038-4626-a265-3e6b16e6a7c6 · outbound

This paper cites Introducing OpenAI o1-preview.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Introducing OpenAI o1-preview

Reference 1

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.704101Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 60968682-0c07-4504-9149-5bbc3aabdda3 · outbound

This paper cites Can generative AI and ChatGPT outperform humans on cognitive-demanding problem-solving tasks in science? Science & Education.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Can generative AI and ChatGPT outperform humans on cognitive-demanding problem-solving tasks in science? Science & Education

Reference 2

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.689402Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 7ee8a7fe-6571-4ba8-a071-7a278042e6db · outbound

This paper cites Artificial intelligence in education research during 2013–2023: A review based on bibliometric analysis.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Artificial intelligence in education research during 2013–2023: A review based on bibliometric analysis

Reference 3

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.674952Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 894d9151-b399-4668-98cc-cd9fd1bae98c · outbound

This paper cites Defining higher order thinking.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Defining higher order thinking

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.660540Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation bc246c85-4925-4a36-ba71-102fbd5e0cb3 · outbound

This paper cites Skills for the 21st Century: teaching higher-order thinking.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Skills for the 21st Century: teaching higher-order thinking

Reference 5

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.646290Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 3f122d7d-42f8-419a-a74e-e5efca2b0ad9 · outbound

This paper cites ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education

Reference 6

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.631855Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 090d0f9e-1ba0-40c5-b1e1-aec3c4139f9b · outbound

This paper cites Evaluation of OpenAI o1: Opportunities and Challenges of AGI; 2024.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Evaluation of OpenAI o1: Opportunities and Challenges of AGI; 2024

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.359642Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 3df84691-50eb-43b5-aae0-2128f8db6275 · outbound

This paper cites Fast Analysis of the OpenAI O1-Preview Model in Solving Random K-SAT Problem: Does the LLM Solve the Problem Itself or Call an External SAT Solver? arXiv preprint arXiv:240911232.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Fast Analysis of the OpenAI O1-Preview Model in Solving Random K-SAT Problem: Does the LLM Solve the Problem Itself or Call an External SAT Solver? arXiv preprint arXiv:240911232

Reference 8

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.617250Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 77b7e4ac-a02a-4295-92d9-7bf34bd47f37 · outbound

This paper cites Can GPT-O1 Kill All Bugs? arXiv preprint arXiv:240910033.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Can GPT-O1 Kill All Bugs? arXiv preprint arXiv:240910033

Reference 9

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.603292Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 851d83db-d0b9-43c4-8330-0e8f96fb1887 · outbound

This paper cites Let’s Verify Step by Step.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Let’s Verify Step by Step

Reference 10

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.589000Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 3b5eafef-50a4-4d28-91cf-171a079c9bde · outbound

This paper cites Self-Reflection in LLM Agents: Effects on Problem-Solving Performance.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Self-Reflection in LLM Agents: Effects on Problem-Solving Performance

Reference 11

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.574653Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation bc01d168-8224-4d1d-8ab2-289861e4c5a0 · outbound

This paper cites Relevant or Random: Can LLMs Truly Perform Analogical Reasoning? arXiv preprint arXiv:240412728.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Relevant or Random: Can LLMs Truly Perform Analogical Reasoning? arXiv preprint arXiv:240412728

Reference 12

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.560631Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 144f02dd-10cc-4bec-b40a-2491ddc30853 · outbound

This paper cites Semantic Structure-Mapping in LLM and Human Analogical Reasoning.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Semantic Structure-Mapping in LLM and Human Analogical Reasoning

Reference 13

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.546784Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation c70d443b-d5b9-4086-b7c4-959337f173b6 · outbound

This paper cites Exploring collaboration mechanisms for llm agents: A social psychology view.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Exploring collaboration mechanisms for llm agents: A social psychology view

Reference 14

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.532567Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 3764c90d-de63-40f5-ac74-ec4cec71ac89 · outbound

This paper cites Industry 6.0: New Generation of Industry driven by Generative AI and Swarm of Heterogeneous Robots.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Industry 6.0: New Generation of Industry driven by Generative AI and Swarm of Heterogeneous Robots

Reference 15

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.518522Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 419db72b-6cca-4222-aaf7-7c9aba7378b9 · outbound

This paper cites Enhancing LLM Problem Solving with REAP: Reflection, Explicit Problem Deconstruction, and Advanced Prompting.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Enhancing LLM Problem Solving with REAP: Reflection, Explicit Problem Deconstruction, and Advanced Prompting

Reference 16

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.503935Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation bafda039-57d6-42b1-87ac-e86a7e991392 · outbound

This paper cites Ethical Alignment of LLMs in Healthcare: Does GPT-o1 Adopt a Deontological or Utilitarian Approach? medRxiv.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Ethical Alignment of LLMs in Healthcare: Does GPT-o1 Adopt a Deontological or Utilitarian Approach? medRxiv

Reference 17

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.489870Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 998e06d5-0b97-4dfd-8027-a3a33b83c394 · outbound

This paper cites Cornell Critical Thinking Tests Level X & Level Z Manual.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Cornell Critical Thinking Tests Level X & Level Z Manual

Reference 18

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.476001Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation b8d97632-a6b4-4f27-ab1a-b48209d1690e · outbound

This paper cites The Impact of Teaching Critical Thinking on Iranian Students’ Writing Performance and Their Critical Thinking Dispositions.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? The Impact of Teaching Critical Thinking on Iranian Students’ Writing Performance and Their Critical Thinking Dispositions

Reference 19

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.461439Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation d90dee01-c1d8-4cef-9a6d-ca2f10ee714d · outbound

This paper cites The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test: An Instrument for Testing and Teaching.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test: An Instrument for Testing and Teaching

Reference 20

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.446447Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation af58d119-cf20-49f8-b623-800627f30cef · outbound

This paper cites Critical-Inquiry-Based-Learning: Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Ability of Pre-service Teachers.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Critical-Inquiry-Based-Learning: Model of Learning to Promote Critical Thinking Ability of Pre-service Teachers

Reference 21

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.432097Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation d1184f0b-98dc-40af-9620-d5bb977271d0 · outbound

This paper cites The Relationship Between Critical Thinking Skills and In-Class Questioning Behaviours of English Language Teaching Students.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? The Relationship Between Critical Thinking Skills and In-Class Questioning Behaviours of English Language Teaching Students

Reference 22

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.704144Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation d7adb575-5aa2-4437-a464-2bf4a19242ef · outbound

This paper cites Stand-Alone Versus Integrated Critical Thinking Courses.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Stand-Alone Versus Integrated Critical Thinking Courses

Reference 23

Resolution: verified exact; doi, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.688818Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 57a91d7d-889b-4a3e-b178-eaece3be2016 · outbound

This paper cites Assessing EFL Student Progress in Critical Thinking with the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Assessing EFL Student Progress in Critical Thinking with the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test

Reference 24

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.417882Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation e56f12e2-9a83-46f0-9329-fd0c11ddb846 · outbound

This paper cites Validity and Reliability Testing of the International Critical Thinking Essay Test form A (ICTET-A).

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Validity and Reliability Testing of the International Critical Thinking Essay Test form A (ICTET-A)

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.403718Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation aff72253-4530-4e83-859b-406498455e22 · outbound

This paper cites Systems thinking assessments: Approaches that examine engagement in systems thinking.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Systems thinking assessments: Approaches that examine engagement in systems thinking

Reference 26

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.389096Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 9ab2db60-6260-4b8f-a522-8255ad521c1a · outbound

This paper cites Investigating student approaches to scenario-based assessments of systems thinking.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Investigating student approaches to scenario-based assessments of systems thinking

Reference 27

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.374924Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 6dbd7061-5f11-48a8-ac78-e063f04b6c8a · outbound

This paper cites Developing and Validating a Biological System Thinking Test for Middle School Students.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Developing and Validating a Biological System Thinking Test for Middle School Students

Reference 28

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.360342Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation a2ccc052-a501-4dec-9ab7-c9b9fb762e2e · outbound

This paper cites Assessing systems thinking: A tool to measure complex reasoning through ill-structured problems.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Assessing systems thinking: A tool to measure complex reasoning through ill-structured problems

Reference 29

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.345913Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 2d79f0ff-3f81-4f1d-a4d2-43d170b6e13c · outbound

This paper cites The Lake Urmia vignette: a tool to assess understanding of complexity in socio-environmental systems.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? The Lake Urmia vignette: a tool to assess understanding of complexity in socio-environmental systems

Reference 30

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.332152Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation c7b89341-f40f-4214-9522-e4c700a17256 · outbound

This paper cites A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS).

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS)

Reference 31

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.318523Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 501b6a40-90ce-4008-a736-085498d2d724 · outbound

This paper cites Assessing computational thinking: Development and validation of the algorithmic thinking test for adults.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Assessing computational thinking: Development and validation of the algorithmic thinking test for adults

Reference 32

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.304610Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation abc95c49-ac2c-4811-8d14-bdca9a36836d · outbound

This paper cites Data literacy for researchers and data librarians.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Data literacy for researchers and data librarians

Reference 33

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.290756Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation c66d6508-b643-4de2-bca4-48dfa599b7e3 · outbound

This paper cites Creating an understanding of data literacy for a data-driven society.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Creating an understanding of data literacy for a data-driven society

Reference 34

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.277136Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 42862a6e-fbc3-4bd0-97e0-37e960623b80 · outbound

This paper cites Data literacy assessments: A systematic literature review.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Data literacy assessments: A systematic literature review

Reference 35

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.263798Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 4f38f5f7-4501-4c13-b0fb-1da560840fb1 · outbound

This paper cites Effects of an asynchronous online data literacy intervention on pre-service and in-service educators’ beliefs, self-efficacy, and practices.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Effects of an asynchronous online data literacy intervention on pre-service and in-service educators’ beliefs, self-efficacy, and practices

Reference 36

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.250179Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 7fa5616c-c90a-4c47-a895-a4160d21f2c0 · outbound

This paper cites Fostering aspects of pre-service teachers’ data literacy: Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Fostering aspects of pre-service teachers’ data literacy: Results of a randomized controlled trial

Reference 37

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.235858Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 188c620a-4547-4d8a-bb38-6853029cd534 · outbound

This paper cites Validating a novel digital performance-based assessment of data literacy: Psychometric and eye-tracking analyses.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Validating a novel digital performance-based assessment of data literacy: Psychometric and eye-tracking analyses

Reference 38

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.222270Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 4fe88432-d4a9-4574-a3c0-f339bf1eb3b4 · outbound

This paper cites The (dis) pleasures of creativity: Spontaneous eye blink rate during divergent and convergent thinking depends on individual differences in positive and negative affect.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? The (dis) pleasures of creativity: Spontaneous eye blink rate during divergent and convergent thinking depends on individual differences in positive and negative affect

Reference 39

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.208500Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation d7b0f77e-5b32-448c-a2aa-8c69e2cb1d02 · outbound

This paper cites How AI Ideas Affect the Creativity, Diversity, and Evolution of Human Ideas: Evidence From a Large, Dynamic Experiment.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? How AI Ideas Affect the Creativity, Diversity, and Evolution of Human Ideas: Evidence From a Large, Dynamic Experiment

Reference 40

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.193700Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 0094a4ac-168d-49f4-97d4-3c425d7a90fc · outbound

This paper cites The nature of human intelligence.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? The nature of human intelligence

Reference 41

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.179490Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 5e0c350a-d33e-4c5b-b7ad-63f3c4b66d8c · outbound

This paper cites Beyond semantic distance: Automated scoring of divergent thinking greatly improves with large language models.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Beyond semantic distance: Automated scoring of divergent thinking greatly improves with large language models

Reference 42

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.165030Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 663ea8a3-b46c-4eb9-b412-9be00d36d5fe · outbound

This paper cites Applying automated originality scoring to the verbal form of Torrance tests of creative thinking.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Applying automated originality scoring to the verbal form of Torrance tests of creative thinking

Reference 43

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.150800Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 15fe6499-9492-4a1b-901a-77179c5b177e · outbound

This paper cites A distracted muse: The positive effect of dual-task distraction on creative potential.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? A distracted muse: The positive effect of dual-task distraction on creative potential

Reference 44

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.137161Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 1485436a-ff67-454e-aea6-b0706cae27fa · outbound

This paper cites From book to bludgeon: A closer look at unsolicited malevolent responses on the alternate uses task.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? From book to bludgeon: A closer look at unsolicited malevolent responses on the alternate uses task

Reference 45

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.123419Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 62f88686-326c-4e05-8f09-eb1d77a74c09 · outbound

This paper cites Fixation, flexibility, and forgetting during alternate uses tasks.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Fixation, flexibility, and forgetting during alternate uses tasks

Reference 46

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.109764Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation f3eedc7b-0017-48ea-8043-00737c4ac096 · outbound

This paper cites The associative basis of the creative process.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? The associative basis of the creative process

Reference 47

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.095847Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 4a3dce8c-1e9f-45f5-8db8-6ee422f8e515 · outbound

This paper cites An Objective Measuring Tool of Creativity: The Development of Chinese Remote Association Test.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? An Objective Measuring Tool of Creativity: The Development of Chinese Remote Association Test

Reference 48

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.081729Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation cb154129-09cd-4e2a-9227-4a82f9c21130 · outbound

This paper cites Normative data for 102 Spanish remote associate problems and age-related differences in performance.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Normative data for 102 Spanish remote associate problems and age-related differences in performance

Reference 49

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.067718Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 399d0606-5324-4d28-925e-25276de9f0ec · outbound

This paper cites LogiQA: A Challenge Dataset for Machine Reading Comprehension with Logical Reasoning.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? LogiQA: A Challenge Dataset for Machine Reading Comprehension with Logical Reasoning

Reference 50

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.550126Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 558e0c25-1b22-4fd6-871b-43b9e96f1b26 · outbound

This paper cites A concise introduction to logic.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? A concise introduction to logic

Reference 51

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.053469Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 3d66ae19-6a90-47b8-b40f-0a97ee31fde3 · outbound

This paper cites Introduction to Categories and Categorical Logic.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Introduction to Categories and Categorical Logic

Reference 52

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.039023Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation c19059c2-5d84-4833-8d94-18fde0cc6e6b · outbound

This paper cites Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach

Reference 53

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.025138Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 598396e1-0bb9-43c5-89c5-c3c1a33375f6 · outbound

This paper cites Measuring scientific reasoning–a review of test instruments.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Measuring scientific reasoning–a review of test instruments

Reference 54

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:49.011108Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 8a63c63e-fb60-4cec-a55e-14eecfc14e03 · outbound

This paper cites Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): Measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments

Reference 55

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.996781Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation db43fbaf-7d42-4122-bf4e-4faad756c2ff · outbound

This paper cites Milestones: Cognitive.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Milestones: Cognitive

Reference 56

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.982535Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 058e25cf-adc2-4fcd-a55a-4b450e12b02b · outbound

This paper cites The theory of the estimation of test reliability.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? The theory of the estimation of test reliability

Reference 57

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.967582Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 15fadb90-a1c3-4d45-96ed-5ff9dddc5921 · outbound

This paper cites Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

Reference 58

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.953379Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 8b02ee6d-6a23-4b7a-a64c-6a8e45f044a9 · outbound

This paper cites Student performance on the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) does not change with assignment of a low-stakes grade.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Student performance on the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) does not change with assignment of a low-stakes grade

Reference 59

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.939434Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 201e79d3-2d88-4e8e-8bda-56e671c1fc1c · outbound

This paper cites Test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS) indicates limited scientific thinking gains as a result of science and mathematics general education.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS) indicates limited scientific thinking gains as a result of science and mathematics general education

Reference 60

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.925061Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation c1f3157c-272d-477e-8cce-167b566a9169 · outbound

This paper cites Enhancement of students’ biological literacy and critical thinking of biology through socio-biological case-based learning.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Enhancement of students’ biological literacy and critical thinking of biology through socio-biological case-based learning

Reference 61

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.910533Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 156372d3-e477-49df-8b43-875fd2e9aff8 · outbound

This paper cites Comparing self-report assessments and scenario-based assessments of systems thinking competence.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Comparing self-report assessments and scenario-based assessments of systems thinking competence

Reference 62

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.896384Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 6a365c66-eecf-4738-9029-98582eb25d31 · outbound

This paper cites What influences computational thinking? A theoretical and empirical study based on the influence of learning engagement on computational thinking in higher education.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? What influences computational thinking? A theoretical and empirical study based on the influence of learning engagement on computational thinking in higher education

Reference 63

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.882380Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 5804d51b-ca89-4b80-a293-190bd73e50d9 · outbound

This paper cites STEM professional development program for gifted education teachers: STEM lesson plan design competence, self-efficacy, computational thinking and entrepreneurial skills.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? STEM professional development program for gifted education teachers: STEM lesson plan design competence, self-efficacy, computational thinking and entrepreneurial skills

Reference 64

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.867765Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 44e93f6c-8d18-4aa7-9c55-91e905c37193 · outbound

This paper cites Scaffolding Computational Thinking with ChatGPT.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Scaffolding Computational Thinking with ChatGPT

Reference 65

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.851525Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 12945705-373f-4de9-b4b6-11160a8bd6ac · outbound

This paper cites ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? ChatGPT improves creative problem-solving performance in university students: An experimental study

Reference 66

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.837015Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 7f23bcd8-7f5d-4e1e-bfb0-b4627ad3f55a · outbound

This paper cites Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits from cognitive inhibition and cognitive flexibility.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits from cognitive inhibition and cognitive flexibility

Reference 67

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.822567Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation b45a7b74-3bb5-4a1a-89a7-9cdf446412e4 · outbound

This paper cites Exploring the effect of red and blue on cognitive task performances.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? Exploring the effect of red and blue on cognitive task performances

Reference 68

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.808071Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Observation 37ee3e75-7b77-4804-a4b9-08a1c9584ddd · outbound

This paper cites A quantitative study on the scientific literacy skills of prospective biology teachers.

Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking? A quantitative study on the scientific literacy skills of prospective biology teachers

Reference 69

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-11T20:27:48.793268Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

Pith citing papers

Observation 4a4c8d87-3f34-4716-833d-11b19e2bc876 · inbound

Human-Centered Design for AI-based Automatically Generated Assessment Reports: A Systematic Review cites this paper.

Human-Centered Design for AI-based Automatically Generated Assessment Reports: A Systematic Review Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking?

Reference 28

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-10T23:06:54.150295Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation f95ac4c5-6cef-4e17-861a-12df160e2e00 · inbound

Interoceptive Divergence in Aesthetic Evaluation and Implications for Human-AI Alignment cites this paper.

Interoceptive Divergence in Aesthetic Evaluation and Implications for Human-AI Alignment Can OpenAI o1 outperform humans in higher-order cognitive thinking?

Reference 24

Resolution: verified exact; arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-21T10:50:01.550116Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.