Dual-Axis Beam-Steering OPA with purely Passive Phase Shifters

Bowen Yu; Venus Kakdarvishi; Yasha Yi

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 27 references

Dual-Axis Beam-Steering OPA with purely Passive Phase Shifters

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A passive, grating-free silicon OPA steers light in two axes purely by wavelength tuning.

desk verdict The vertical-axis steering is standard physics, but the horizontal 140-degree claim rests on applying a uniform-pitch formula to an aperiodic array; as written, the paper's own equation does not support its headline number. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06801 v1 pith:7VTJRBBY submitted 2024-11-23 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Venus Kakdarvishi , Bowen Yu , Yasha Yi This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph

keywords dual-axisbeamsteeringopticalphasedarraypassivephaseshifterswavelengthtuningsiliconphotonicsmulti-layerOPAsidelobesuppressiondelaylines

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a multi-layer optical phased array in silicon that steers a beam in two orthogonal directions using only wavelength tuning, with no active phase shifters and no grating couplers. The design uses passive delay lines between waveguides within each layer and between corresponding waveguides across layers to set the phase gradients. The authors report a vertical steering range of about 78 degrees over a 6 nm wavelength change and a horizontal range of up to 140 degrees over a 100 nm sweep, with side lobes suppressed by non-uniform emitter spacing. If these results hold, solid-state beam steering for LiDAR or free-space optics could become simpler, lower-loss, and free of the power-hungry phase tuning normally required.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the set of passive waveguide delay lines with two length scales: $\Delta L_1$ sets the phase difference between adjacent emitters within each layer, and $\Delta L_2$ sets the phase difference between corresponding emitters in adjacent layers. The steering follows $d \sin\psi = m\lambda - n_{\mathrm{eff}}(\lambda)\Delta L$, so wavelength tuning changes the phase and thus the beam angle; because $\Delta\phi = 2\pi\Delta L\, n_{\mathrm{eff}}(\lambda)/\lambda$, longer delay lines yield faster steering and periodic repetition of the scanning range. The array is 8 layers by 8 waveguides, with non-uniform horizontal pitches for side-lobe control and a uniform vertical pitch of 1.2 µm set by cladding thickness.

What would settle it

A direct check: simulate or fabricate the proposed 8-layer structure and measure the vertical beam angle versus wavelength over 1.5–1.6 µm; if the slope is significantly below 13°/nm, or if the $\Delta L_2$ needed to reach that slope cannot be fit in the taper/Y-splitter/$\Omega$ layout with acceptable insertion loss, the claimed wide vertical field of view fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a passive, grating-free, eight-layer silicon OPA with intra-layer delay lines ($\Delta L_1$) and inter-layer delay lines ($\Delta L_2$) achieves continuous two-dimensional beam steering by wavelength tuning alone. The vertical axis, driven by $\Delta L_2$, steers at about 13°/nm, giving a viewing angle of roughly 78° within a ~6 nm wavelength range; the horizontal axis, driven by $\Delta L_1$, steers at about 1.4°/nm, covering up to 140° over a 100 nm sweep. The design also asserts the ability to choose positive or negative phase slope profiles by reversing the order of inter-layer delays, and maintains a maximum side-lobe suppression ratio of -8.82 dB at 1550 nm using non-uniform pitch optimized by particle swarm.

Load-bearing premise

The entire vertical steering range depends on an inter-layer delay length $\Delta L_2$ that the paper never states or shows can be routed without prohibitive loss or footprint growth.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Two-dimensional beam steering becomes possible without active phase shifters or grating couplers, removing substrate-leakage losses and the need for lookup-table phase control.
The steep 13°/nm vertical slope means a small, fast wavelength sweep covers a wide angle, which could enable rapid scanning with a compact tunable laser.
The ability to flip between positive and negative phase slope profiles allows bidirectional scanning without any change in the physical layout.
Non-uniform emitter spacing with optimized side-lobe suppression keeps the beam profile clean across the steering range, which matters for LiDAR and free-space links.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper does not state the inter-layer delay length $\Delta L_2$; estimating it from the 13°/nm slope and $n_{\mathrm{eff}} \approx 2.4$–2.5 gives a value in the hundreds of micrometers, so whether it fits in the proposed $\Omega$-shaped stage without high loss is an open question.
Because both axes are driven by a single wavelength knob, the array traces a predetermined trajectory in angle space rather than addressing arbitrary points; covering a full 2D region requires raster-like repeated sweeps.
If the simulated steering slopes hold in fabrication, this architecture could become a candidate for chip-scale LiDAR, but the delay-line loss and routing density per layer need direct experimental characterization.
The reversible phase slope suggests the same array could act as a transceiver, steering the outgoing beam and, by time reversal, listening along the same direction.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The thing to know about arXiv:2412.06801 is that the horizontal steering claim is built on a mismatch between the equation and the described geometry. Section II gives the standard uniform-array law d sin(psi) = m lambda - n_eff Delta L. Section III then says the eight emitters per layer use non-uniform, PSO-optimized spacing, with smaller delay lines between waveguides. If each adjacent pair has the same Delta L1, the phase increments are constant per element index, not per physical position. For a beam at angle psi you need phase proportional to k0 x_i sin(psi); with aperiodic x_i, a constant index-based phase gradient produces residual phase errors that grow with angle. The claimed 140-degree FOV is therefore not a consequence of Eq. (1). If instead the Delta L1 are individually chosen to match position, the paper needs to say so and provide the values. Either way, the central claim lacks a stated valid mechanism.

That is a load-bearing flaw, and it is the reason I am not endorsing the results. The vertical axis is standard: uniform 1.2-micron pitch, longer inter-layer delay lines, and Eq. (1) should apply. But the paper never reports Delta L2, the delay lengths, or the PSO-optimized positions, so the 13-degree/nm figure cannot be checked. The single SLL value of -8.82 dB is an optimized outcome at one wavelength, not a validation across the sweep. And the citation [3] points to an arXiv paper on object detection, which is clearly a mistake.

What is genuinely new is the multi-layer edge-emitting architecture with inter-layer delay lines for the second axis. That is a real extension of the authors' earlier one-axis multi-layer work, and avoiding grating couplers is a reasonable motivation. The prior self-aligned fabrication work [23] makes the design credible in principle. The positive or negative phase slope capability is a useful schematic point.

This paper is for a reader in integrated photonics who wants to see an alternative route to passive 2D steering. It needs serious revision: fix the horizontal steering law or disclose a position-matched delay vector, report the missing parameters, and add baseline comparisons. It is not desk-reject material, but it is far from acceptance as written.

My recommendation: send it to review, but expect major revision. I would not cite it until the steering mechanism is reconciled and parameters appear.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an eight-layer, eight-emitter-per-layer silicon/silica optical phased array (OPA) in which all phase shifting is done by passive delay lines, with two-dimensional beam steering achieved solely by wavelength tuning and no grating couplers. Section II derives the steering relation for a uniform array, and Section III introduces a non-uniform (PSO-optimized) in-plane emitter pitch for side-lobe suppression while a uniform 1.2 µm pitch is used between layers. The authors claim a vertical viewing angle of about 78° over a ~6 nm wavelength range, a horizontal viewing angle of up to 140° over a 100 nm range, and a side-lobe suppression ratio of -8.82 dB at 1550 nm, with 3D FDTD simulations said to validate the design. The manuscript does not report the actual delay lengths, optimized emitter coordinates, or simulation settings, and Section III's application of the uniform-array equation to the non-uniform horizontal array is not justified.

Significance. If the claims were fully substantiated, the design would be an interesting step toward low-power, grating-free 2D beam steering: passive delay lines remove the power and stabilization overhead of active phase shifters, and edge emission avoids substrate-leakage losses from grating couplers. The multilayer architecture and the use of PSO for non-uniform pitch are sensible engineering tools. However, the paper's central quantitative claims are currently supported only by undisclosed parameters and by equations that are not shown to apply to the actual non-uniform array. The independent FDTD check is in principle a strength, but without reporting the simulated geometry it cannot be assessed. The paper would be publishable only after the missing data are supplied and the horizontal-axis steering mechanism is either corrected or re-derived.

major comments (4)

[Section II and Section III, Eq. (1)] The steering law in Eq. (1) is derived for a uniform pitch d and a single delay difference ΔL, but the horizontal axis uses eight emitters with non-uniform, PSO-optimized spacing and 'smaller delay lines' between adjacent waveguides. If each adjacent pair has the same intra-layer delay ΔL1, the phase increment is constant per emitter index, while a beam at angle ψ requires phase proportional to the emitter position x_i, i.e., k0 x_i sinψ. For non-uniform x_i, the residual phase error k0 x_i sinψ − iΔϕ grows with i and with sinψ, and at the claimed ±70° extremes a pitch perturbation of order λ/2 introduces phase errors of order π, which would split or severely degrade the main lobe. Thus the 140° horizontal FOV is unsupported as stated. The authors must either disclose a position-matched delay vector ΔL1,i (and the resulting modified steering relation) or show that a different mechanism produces the horizontal scan; the current text does neither.
[Section II and Section III, Fig. 1] The values of ΔL1 and ΔL2 are never stated. The vertical slope of 13°/nm and horizontal slope of 1.4°/nm depend directly on these lengths through ψ = sin⁻¹(λ/d − neffΔL/d) and Δλ ≈ λ²/(ΔL neff); without them, the claimed 78° vertical FOV over 6 nm and the 140° horizontal FOV cannot be checked. In particular, the vertical pitch of 1.2 µm is given but ΔL2 is not, and no estimate is provided for the footprint or propagation loss of the two-stage taper/Y-splitter/Ω routing that is said to house the long delays. These missing numbers are load-bearing for the central steering claim.
[Section IV and Section III] The simulation section lists only the use of Lumerical FDE, FDTD, and Omnisim software, but gives no mesh size, domain size, boundary conditions, waveguide dimensions, bend radii, taper/splitter geometry, or number of layers actually simulated. The FDTD results are asserted through figures whose quantitative content is not reproduced in the text, and no comparison between the simulated far fields and the analytic Eq. (1) is shown. This prevents the reader from verifying that the simulation is an independent check rather than a fitted or idealized model.
[Section III, PSO results] The paper reports only that PSO used 64 adjustable parameters and converged after 436 iterations, and that the 'Maximum SLSR of -8.82 dB at 1550nm' was observed. Because the non-uniform positions were optimized to minimize side lobes at boresight, this single number is a fitted outcome, not a validation; the paper should list the optimized coordinates, show the side-lobe level across the full steering range rather than only at 1550 nm, and compare with a uniform-pitch baseline. The notation is also confusing: a Side Lobe Suppression Ratio is normally positive for good suppression, with negative dB indicating that the sidelobe is only 8.82 dB below the main lobe, which would be a poor value; this must be clarified.

minor comments (5)

[Section II] Equation (1) includes an integer diffraction order m, but the subsequent steering formula ψ(λ) = sin⁻¹(λ/d − neffΔL/d) drops the m term; the range of orders relevant to the claimed FOV should be stated explicitly.
[Section II] The expression Δλ = λ²/(ΔL neff(λ)) neglects the dispersion of neff, which the paper itself gives as 2.50 at 1500 nm and 2.39 at 1600 nm; over a 100 nm sweep this is a non-negligible effect and should be included in the slope calculation or justified as negligible.
[Section III, Fig. 2] The caption says that for each main lobe the wavelength and corresponding side-lobe level are shown, but the figure as presented in the manuscript does not make these values legible; a table of wavelengths, angles, and SLLs would be more informative.
[References] Reference [3] (arXiv:2411.09062, 'Multimodal object detection using depth and image data for manufacturing parts') appears unrelated to MEMS optical phased arrays and should be replaced or removed.
[Throughout] The paper uses θ and ψ for the vertical and horizontal axes interchangeably; the coordinate axes should be defined once and used consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the steering relation is an applied standard phased-array model, and the FDTD/PSO results are independent numerical outcomes.

full rationale

The paper's central steering equation, d sin(psi) = m lambda - n_eff(lambda) DeltaL, is a standard interference condition used as a design input, not a result derived from the architecture; the wavelength-steering slopes follow from the chosen delay lengths via this physical model. The paper does not disclose all DeltaL values, but that is a completeness or correctness gap, not circularity. The reported PSO-optimized SLSR of -8.82 dB is a fitness-optimization output, presented as an optimized performance figure rather than as a first-principles prediction. Self-citations to the authors' prior multi-layer OPA work are background references and do not carry the load of the steering-angle derivation. The FDTD simulations provide an independent numerical check of the design's behavior. The horizontal-axis concern about applying the uniform-pitch equation to a non-uniform emitter arrangement is a validity or implementation issue, not an equivalence-by-construction or fitted-input-called-prediction issue. No specific derivation step reduces to its own inputs, and no load-bearing self-citation chain forces the central claim. Therefore the paper is not circular in the sense defined by this analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The design uses standard phased-array equations, material indices from a commercial library, and PSO-optimized emitter positions. The only free design choices are the delay lengths and pitch values, which are not reported. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (4)

Inter-layer delay length ΔL2 = not stated
Chosen to yield the 13°/nm fast-axis steering; not reported in the text.
Intra-layer delay length ΔL1 = not stated
Chosen to yield the 1.4°/nm slow-axis steering; not reported in the text.
PSO-optimized lateral emitter positions = not stated (64 values)
Optimized to minimize side lobe level; the resulting positions are not provided.
Vertical inter-layer pitch = 1.2 µm
Set by cladding thickness; treated as a design choice rather than derived.

assumptions (3)

standard math Phased array steering relation d sinψ = mλ - neff(λ)ΔL
Used in Eq. (1) to design the delay lines; standard result from array theory.
domain assumption Single-mode operation of 500 nm x 220 nm Si waveguide with neff ~2.5 at 1500 nm and ~2.39 at 1600 nm
Stated in Section II; supported by an FDE solver but the solver output is not independently provided.
domain assumption The far-field beam pattern is governed by the designed phase differences with negligible inter-layer and inter-waveguide coupling
Implicit in using Eq. (1) for both steering axes; the FDTD simulation would test this but no coupling analysis is shown.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dual-Axis Beam-Steering OPA with purely Passive Phase Shifters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7VTJRBBY

@misc{pith2026241206801,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dual-Axis Beam-Steering OPA with purely Passive Phase Shifters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7VTJRBBY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06801}
}

read the original abstract

In this work, we present a multi-layer optical phased array (OPA) designed for dual-axis beam steering on a silicon (Si) platform, utilizing only wavelength tuning. Our design eliminates the need for grating couplers, commonly required for dual-axis beam steering, thereby reducing energy losses due to substrate leakage. It also features the unique capability of achieving a positive or negative phase slope profile. This three-dimensional architecture enhances output efficiency by emitting light from the device edge, providing greater flexibility and improved performance in beam steering. This approach opens up new possibilities for on-chip photonic systems, enabling faster, more accurate, and broader beam steering range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06801 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** (a), (b) Linear fitting of the wavelength tuning efficiency (m [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Beam Steering in 8-Layer Designs: Reversing the phase slope mirrors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

[3]

Multimodal object detection using depth and image data for manufacturing parts,

N. Mahjourian and V . Nguyen, “Multimodal object detection using depth and image data for manufacturing parts,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09062

arXiv 2024
[23]

Fabrication of a self- aligned multi-waveguide-layer passive si3n4/sio2 photonic integrated circuit for a 3-d optical phased array device,

D. Wu, K. Owen, B. Yu, and Y . Yi, “Fabrication of a self- aligned multi-waveguide-layer passive si3n4/sio2 photonic integrated circuit for a 3-d optical phased array device,” Opt. Mater. Express , vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 13–21, Jan 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //opg.optica.org/ome/abstract.cfm?URI=ome-14-1-13

work page 2024
[1]

Advanced liquid crystal on silicon optical phased arrays,

S. Serati and J. Stockley, “Advanced liquid crystal on silicon optical phased arrays,” in Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference , vol. 3, 2002, pp. 3–3

work page 2002
[2]

High-speed 32×32 MEMS optical phased array,

M. Megens, B.-W. Yoo, T. Chan, W. Yang, T. Sun, C. J. Chang- Hasnain, M. C. Wu, and D. A. Horsley, “High-speed 32×32 MEMS optical phased array,” in MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems XIII , W. Piyawattanametha and Y .-H. Park, Eds., vol. 8977, International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, 2014, p. 89770H. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/1...

work page doi:10.1117/12.2044197 2014
[4]

High-efficiency end-fire 3d optical phased array based on a multi-layer si3n4/sio2 platform,

D. Wu, Y . Yi, and Y . Zhang, “High-efficiency end-fire 3d optical phased array based on a multi-layer si3n4/sio2 platform,” Appl. Opt., vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 2489–2497, Mar 2020. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-59-8-2489

work page 2020
[5]

Photonic integrated circuits for an optical phased array,

Y . Yi, D. Wu, V . Kakdarvishi, B. Yu, Y . Zhuang, and A. Khalilian, “Photonic integrated circuits for an optical phased array,” Photonics, vol. 11, no. 3, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/ 2304-6732/11/3/243

work page 2024
[6]

High- performance modulators employing organic electro-optic materials on the silicon platform,

W. Freude, A. Kotz, H. Kholeif, A. Schwarzenberger, A. Kuzmin, C. Es- chenbaum, A. Mertens, S. Sarwar, P. Erk, S. Br¨ase, and C. Koos, “High- performance modulators employing organic electro-optic materials on the silicon platform,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 30, no. 4: Adv. Mod. and Int. beyond Si and InP-based Plt., pp....

work page 2024
[7]

Fast spatial beam shaping by acousto-optic diffraction for 3d non-linear microscopy,

W. Akemann, J.-F. L ´eger, C. Ventalon, B. Mathieu, S. Dieudonn ´e, and L. Bourdieu, “Fast spatial beam shaping by acousto-optic diffraction for 3d non-linear microscopy,” Opt. Express , vol. 23, no. 22, pp. 28 191–28 205, Nov 2015. [Online]. Available: https: //opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-23-22-28191

work page 2015

Show all 27 references

[8]

All-plasmonic Optical Phased Array Integrated on a Thin-film Platform,

Y .-S. Zeng, S.-W. Qu, B.-J. Chen, and C. H. Chan, “All-plasmonic Optical Phased Array Integrated on a Thin-film Platform,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 9959, Aug. 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10398-8

2017 doi
[9]

Silicon- based optical phased array using electro-optic p - i - n phase shifters,

G. Kang, S.-H. Kim, J.-B. You, D.-S. Lee, H. Yoon, Y .-G. Ha, J.-H. Kim, D.-E. Yoo, D.-W. Lee, C.-H. Youn, K. Yu, and H.-H. Park, “Silicon- based optical phased array using electro-optic p - i - n phase shifters,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters , vol. 31, no. 21, pp. 1685–1...

2019
[10]

Integrated phased array for wide-angle beam steering,

A. Yaacobi, J. Sun, M. Moresco, G. Leake, D. Coolbaugh, and M. R. Watts, “Integrated phased array for wide-angle beam steering,” Opt. Lett., vol. 39, no. 15, pp. 4575–4578, Aug 2014. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-39-15-4575

2014
[11]

Two-dimensional beam scanning of passive optical phased array based on silicon nitride delay line,

L. Yu, P. Wang, P. Ma, L. Cui, Z. Wang, Y . Yang, Y . Zhang, and J. Pan, “Two-dimensional beam scanning of passive optical phased array based on silicon nitride delay line,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2756–2764, 2023

2023
[12]

Two-dimensional dis- persive off-chip beam scanner fabricated on silicon-on-insulator,

K. Van Acoleyen, W. Bogaerts, and R. Baets, “Two-dimensional dis- persive off-chip beam scanner fabricated on silicon-on-insulator,” IEEE photonics technology letters , vol. 23, no. 17, pp. 1270–1272, 2011

2011
[13]

Effective half-wavelength pitch optical phased array design for aliasing- free 2d beam steering,

Y . Lei, L. Zhang, Y . Xue, Y . Ren, Q. Zhang, W. Zhang, and X. Sun, “Effective half-wavelength pitch optical phased array design for aliasing- free 2d beam steering,” Applied Optics, vol. 61, no. 32, pp. 9423–9428, 2022

2022
[14]

End-fire silicon optical phased array with half-wavelength spacing,

M. R. Kossey, C. Rizk, and A. C. Foster, “End-fire silicon optical phased array with half-wavelength spacing,” APL Photonics , vol. 3, no. 1, p. 011301, 12 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5000741

2017 doi
[15]

Off-chip beam steering with a one-dimensional optical phased array on silicon-on-insulator,

K. V . Acoleyen, W. Bogaerts, J. J ´agersk´a, N. L. Thomas, R. Houdr ´e, and R. Baets, “Off-chip beam steering with a one-dimensional optical phased array on silicon-on-insulator,” Opt. Lett. , vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 1477–1479, May 2009. [Online]. Available: https: //opg.optica.o...

2009
[16]

One- dimensional off-chip beam steering and shaping using optical phased ar- rays on silicon-on-insulator,

K. Van Acoleyen, K. Komorowska, W. Bogaerts, and R. Baets, “One- dimensional off-chip beam steering and shaping using optical phased ar- rays on silicon-on-insulator,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 29, no. 23, pp. 3500–3505, 2011

2011
[17]

Silicon optical phased array with grating lobe-free beam formation over 180 degree field of view,

C. T. Phare, M. C. Shin, J. Sharma, S. Ahasan, H. Krishnaswamy, and M. Lipson, “Silicon optical phased array with grating lobe-free beam formation over 180 degree field of view,” in CLEO: Science and Innovations. Optica Publishing Group, 2018, pp. SM3I–2

2018
[18]

Optical phased array antenna with wide steering range using grating array superlattices,

Z. Wu, W. Jiang, J. Xia, and Q. Huang, “Optical phased array antenna with wide steering range using grating array superlattices,” in Sixth International Conference on Optical and Photonic Engineering (icOPEN 2018), vol. 10827. SPIE, 2018, pp. 645–650

2018
[19]

On-chip silicon optical phased array for two- dimensional beam steering,

D. Kwong, A. Hosseini, J. Covey, Y . Zhang, X. Xu, H. Subbaraman, and R. T. Chen, “On-chip silicon optical phased array for two- dimensional beam steering,” Opt. Lett. , vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 941–944, Feb 2014. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm? URI=ol-39-4-941

2014
[20]

Dispersive silicon–nitride optical phased array incorporating arrayed waveguide delay lines for passive line beam scanning,

B. Bhandari, C. Wang, J.-Y . Gwon, J.-M. Heo, S.-Y . Ko, M.-C. Oh, and S.-S. Lee, “Dispersive silicon–nitride optical phased array incorporating arrayed waveguide delay lines for passive line beam scanning,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 18759, 2022

2022
[21]

Serpentine optical phased arrays for scalable integrated photonic lidar beam steering,

N. Dostart, B. Zhang, A. Khilo, M. Brand, K. A. Qubaisi, D. Onural, D. Feldkhun, K. H. Wagner, and M. A. Popovi ´c, “Serpentine optical phased arrays for scalable integrated photonic lidar beam steering,” Optica, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 726–733, Jun 2020. [Online]. Available: https...

2020
[22]

Photonic integrated circuit with multiple waveguide layers for broadband high-efficient 3d opa,

D. Wu, B. Yu, V . Kakdarvishi, and Y . Yi, “Photonic integrated circuit with multiple waveguide layers for broadband high-efficient 3d opa,” Opt. Lett. , vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 968–971, Feb 2023. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-48-4-968

2023
[24]

Efficient and broad band coupling between silicon and ultra-low-loss silicon nitride waveguides,

M. L. Davenport and J. E. Bowers, “Efficient and broad band coupling between silicon and ultra-low-loss silicon nitride waveguides,” in 2016 IEEE Photonics Conference (IPC) , 2016, pp. 631–632

2016
[25]

Silicon nitride assisted 1×64 optical phased array based on a soi platform,

Q. Wang, S. Wang, L. Jia, Y . Cai, W. Yue, and M. Yu, “Silicon nitride assisted 1×64 optical phased array based on a soi platform,” Opt. Express , vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 10 509–10 517, Mar 2021. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-29-7-10509

2021
[26]

Design and fabrication of sin-si dual-layer optical phased array chip,

W. Pengfei, L. Guangzhen, Y . Hongyan, Z. Xuliang, Z. Yejin, and P. Jiaoqing, “Design and fabrication of sin-si dual-layer optical phased array chip,” in Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (ACPC)
[2019]

Optica Publishing Group, 2019, p. M4B.6. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ACPC-2019-M4B.6

2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [3]

Multimodal object detection using depth and image data for manufacturing parts,

N. Mahjourian and V . Nguyen, “Multimodal object detection using depth and image data for manufacturing parts,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09062

arXiv 2024

[2] [23]

Fabrication of a self- aligned multi-waveguide-layer passive si3n4/sio2 photonic integrated circuit for a 3-d optical phased array device,

D. Wu, K. Owen, B. Yu, and Y . Yi, “Fabrication of a self- aligned multi-waveguide-layer passive si3n4/sio2 photonic integrated circuit for a 3-d optical phased array device,” Opt. Mater. Express , vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 13–21, Jan 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //opg.optica.org/ome/abstract.cfm?URI=ome-14-1-13

work page 2024

[3] [1]

Advanced liquid crystal on silicon optical phased arrays,

S. Serati and J. Stockley, “Advanced liquid crystal on silicon optical phased arrays,” in Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference , vol. 3, 2002, pp. 3–3

work page 2002

[4] [2]

High-speed 32×32 MEMS optical phased array,

M. Megens, B.-W. Yoo, T. Chan, W. Yang, T. Sun, C. J. Chang- Hasnain, M. C. Wu, and D. A. Horsley, “High-speed 32×32 MEMS optical phased array,” in MOEMS and Miniaturized Systems XIII , W. Piyawattanametha and Y .-H. Park, Eds., vol. 8977, International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, 2014, p. 89770H. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1117/1...

work page doi:10.1117/12.2044197 2014

[5] [4]

High-efficiency end-fire 3d optical phased array based on a multi-layer si3n4/sio2 platform,

D. Wu, Y . Yi, and Y . Zhang, “High-efficiency end-fire 3d optical phased array based on a multi-layer si3n4/sio2 platform,” Appl. Opt., vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 2489–2497, Mar 2020. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-59-8-2489

work page 2020

[6] [5]

Photonic integrated circuits for an optical phased array,

Y . Yi, D. Wu, V . Kakdarvishi, B. Yu, Y . Zhuang, and A. Khalilian, “Photonic integrated circuits for an optical phased array,” Photonics, vol. 11, no. 3, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/ 2304-6732/11/3/243

work page 2024

[7] [6]

High- performance modulators employing organic electro-optic materials on the silicon platform,

W. Freude, A. Kotz, H. Kholeif, A. Schwarzenberger, A. Kuzmin, C. Es- chenbaum, A. Mertens, S. Sarwar, P. Erk, S. Br¨ase, and C. Koos, “High- performance modulators employing organic electro-optic materials on the silicon platform,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 30, no. 4: Adv. Mod. and Int. beyond Si and InP-based Plt., pp....

work page 2024

[8] [7]

Fast spatial beam shaping by acousto-optic diffraction for 3d non-linear microscopy,

W. Akemann, J.-F. L ´eger, C. Ventalon, B. Mathieu, S. Dieudonn ´e, and L. Bourdieu, “Fast spatial beam shaping by acousto-optic diffraction for 3d non-linear microscopy,” Opt. Express , vol. 23, no. 22, pp. 28 191–28 205, Nov 2015. [Online]. Available: https: //opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-23-22-28191

work page 2015