Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 24 references

High-ellipticity resonant below-threshold harmonic generation by a helium atom driven by a moderately intense elliptically polarized laser field

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that at multiphoton resonance frequencies, a helium atom driven by an elliptically polarized laser emits intense below-threshold harmonics whose ellipticity can exceed the laser ellipticity by more than a factor of two.

desk verdict Genuine numerical finding that below-threshold harmonics can beat the driver's ellipticity, but the universality claim outruns the SAE evidence; deserves review, needs a two-electron check or much softer conclusions. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07346 v1 pith:PL4VRVKJ submitted 2024-12-10 physics.optics physics.atom-ph

Mikhail Yu. Emelin , Mikhail Yu. Ryabikin This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.atom-ph
keywords below-thresholdharmonicgenerationheliumatomellipticallypolarizedlaserellipticitymultiphotonresonancemagneticsublevelssingle-active-electronapproximationtime-dependentSchrödingerequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that when a helium atom is driven by a moderately intense elliptically polarized laser pulse in the multiphoton, below-threshold regime, certain laser frequencies produce a large increase in harmonic generation efficiency together with a large increase in the harmonic's ellipticity, up to more than twice the driver's ellipticity in absolute value. The resonant frequencies are identified as multiphoton transitions, notably the 4-photon 1s–3d and 1s–4d resonances for the 3rd harmonic and the 6-photon 1s–3d and 1s–4d resonances for the 5th harmonic. The paper explains the effect through the different rates at which an elliptically polarized field populates magnetic sublevels, so that the $m=\pm 2$ decay channels dominate and emit nearly circularly polarized harmonic light. The results are similar in two- and three-dimensional models with different model potentials, and the paper argues the mechanism is therefore a general property of multiphoton resonances rather than an artifact of one model. If correct, this gives a simple route to bright, highly elliptical VUV radiation below the ionization threshold, without two-color fields or anisotropic molecular media.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the magnetic-sublevel population imbalance produced by a multiphoton resonance in an elliptically polarized field. Decomposing the elliptical laser field into two circularly polarized modes, the ratio of photon numbers in the weaker to the stronger mode is $((1-\varepsilon_L)/(1+\varepsilon_L))^2$, and a state with magnetic quantum number $m$ absorbs a specific number $\gamma$ of photons from the weaker mode (for the 4-photon 1s–3d resonance, $\gamma=3,2,1$ for $m=2,0,-2$). Since excitation rates scale as that ratio to the power $\gamma$ (Eq. (10)), the $m=2$ and $m=-2$ states are populated at very different rates. Depopulation of $|m|=2$ states emits harmonic photons into the dominant laser mode, giving circularly polarized harmonic light; Eq. (15) turns the ratio of depopulation rates into an estimated harmonic ellipticity $\varepsilon_{3\omega}\approx -0.28$ for $\varepsilon_L=-0.1$, already more than twice the driver's value. This rate imbalance, not any geometric or propagation effect, is what carries the high-ellipticity signal.

What would settle it

Measure, in a full two-electron helium calculation or an experiment, the ellipticity and yield of the 3rd harmonic near $\omega\approx 0.214$ a.u. (the 4-photon 1s–3d resonance) at $10^{14}$ W/cm$^2$ with laser ellipticity $\varepsilon_L=-0.1$; the paper predicts $|\varepsilon_3|$ roughly 2–3 times $|\varepsilon_L|$ and little yield dependence on $\varepsilon_L$, so observing $|\varepsilon_3|\le |\varepsilon_L|$ or a strong ellipticity-induced yield drop would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that below-threshold harmonic generation in the multiphoton regime can produce harmonics with ellipticities substantially larger than the driver's, at laser frequencies that hit multiphoton resonances of the atom. For helium at $10^{14}$ W/cm$^2$ and driver ellipticities of $-0.1$ to $-0.5$, the 3rd, 5th, and 7th harmonics all exhibit local intensity maxima at frequencies independent of the laser ellipticity, and at those frequencies the harmonic ellipticity exceeds the driver ellipticity in absolute value by two or more times: the 3rd harmonic can reach ellipticities close to 1 at $\varepsilon_L = -0.5$, and the 7th can reach about 0.9 already at $\varepsilon_L = -0.3$. The resonant frequencies correspond to multiphoton excitation of 1s–nd transitions: a 4-photon resonance for the 3rd harmonic and a 6-photon resonance for the 5th. The explanation is that an elliptically polarized field populates $m=2$ and $m=-2$ magnetic sublevels at very different rates, and the decay of the $|m|=2$ states emits nearly circularly polarized harmonic photons into the dominant laser mode, pulling the total harmonic ellipticity above the laser's.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the single-active-electron model potentials reproducing the real helium resonances (especially 3d and 4d) well enough, since the potentials are fitted only to the 1s, 2s, and 2p energies and no two-electron or experimental check is included.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At multiphoton resonance frequencies such as the 4-photon 1s–3d transition ($\omega\approx 0.214$ a.u.), helium's 3rd harmonic is emitted with an ellipticity that exceeds the driving laser's ellipticity by a factor of roughly 2–3 in absolute value.
  • The 5th harmonic behaves the same way at 6-photon 1s–nd resonances, and the 7th harmonic can reach near-circular polarization at moderate laser ellipticities.
  • In this regime the harmonic yield depends weakly, or in some cases almost not at all, on the driver ellipticity, unlike conventional tunneling-regime high-harmonic generation.
  • Because the effect appears in both 2D and 3D models with different potentials, the authors argue the underlying mechanism is a general property of multiphoton resonances in elliptically polarized fields, not an artifact of one model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • By extension, the same magnetic-sublevel population imbalance should appear in other atoms or molecules whenever an elliptically polarized field hits a multiphoton resonance to a state with $|m|=2$ sublevels; the resonance frequencies will move with the level structure, but the polarization enhancement should survive.
  • The mechanism offers a frequency-domain switch: tuning the laser onto a 4-photon versus a 6-photon resonance selects which harmonic order becomes intense and highly elliptical, potentially allowing order-selective polarization control without two-color fields.
  • A natural next calculation is to repeat the 3D runs with a full two-electron helium description or with a potential fitted to the 3d and 4d energies; the authors' own argument predicts the qualitative effect remains, but the quantitative ellipticities and resonance positions would be the test.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports time-dependent Schrödinger equation simulations of below-threshold harmonic generation in helium driven by elliptically polarized laser pulses. Using two single-active-electron model potentials, one in 2D and one in 3D, the authors find laser frequencies at which resonant multiphoton excitation (e.g., the four-photon 1s-3d transition) produces harmonics whose yield and ellipticity are both enhanced, with the harmonic ellipticity exceeding the driver ellipticity by up to a factor of about 2-3. They identify the excited-state pathways by projecting the wavefunction on field-free states and propose a rate-equation-like mechanism based on selective population of magnetic sublevels in the elliptically polarized field. The paper concludes that the mechanism is universal with respect to the specific atomic potential and model dimensionality.

Significance. If the effect is real for helium, this is an interesting route to coherent VUV radiation with high ellipticity below the ionization threshold, a regime of practical relevance for dichroism studies. The numerical evidence is meaningful because it comes from direct TDSE integration rather than perturbative models, and the qualitative agreement between 2D and 3D calculations with two different potentials supports the robustness of the resonant peaks and the ellipticity enhancement. The identification of the 1s-nd multiphoton resonances as the origin of the enhanced harmonics is a useful diagnostic, and the proposed mechanism--population imbalance of magnetic sublevels--is physically plausible. The main weaknesses are that the helium-specific claim rests entirely on single-active-electron potentials fitted only to the lowest states, that the analytic model leaves the multiphoton matrix elements unevaluated and uses numerical populations as input, and that the universality claim is broader than what two similar potentials can establish.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sec. II, Eqs. (8)-(9); Sec. VI] The statement that the effect occurs 'regardless of the specific type of atomic potential and model dimensionality' is stronger than the evidence. The two potentials in Eqs. (8) and (9) are both single-active-electron central potentials with a -1/r tail, and both are fitted only to the 1s, 2s, and 2p energies of helium. Because the effect is carried by 3d and 4d states, the near-identical d-level quantum defects of the two models leave the crucial multiphoton matrix elements essentially untested, and the 2D-versus-3D comparison does not test the missing electron-electron interaction. To support the claim about helium, the authors should either perform a full two-electron helium calculation at the identified resonances (e.g., omega=0.214 and 0.22 a.u.) or vary the model-potential family so that the higher d-state energies are genuinely different, and then show that the qualitative effect persists.
  2. [Sec. V, Eqs. (10)-(15)] The analytic explanation is not a parameter-free account of the ellipticity enhancement. The multiphoton matrix elements d^{(4)} and d^{(2)} in Eqs. (10) and (12) are not computed (the text states this is 'beyond the scope'), and the numerical estimate of the |m|=2 contribution in Eq. (15) uses the population ratio C_{3d,m=2}^2/C_{3d,m=-2}^2 extracted from the same simulation (Fig. 3d). Consequently, the derived value epsilon_{3omega} approx -0.281 is a consistency check that re-inserts the simulation output, not an independent prediction. In addition, the m=0 channel, which the authors state reduces the total ellipticity, is never quantitatively bounded. The mechanism would be substantially strengthened if the m=0 contribution were estimated from the simulation or if the multiphoton matrix elements were evaluated for the model potentials.
  3. [Sec. III; Sec. IV; Fig. 1; Fig. 2] The central claim is a numerical result, yet the manuscript provides no convergence or parameter-dependence information: no grid spacing, box size, time step, or absorption parameters are reported, and the pulse-length dependence is not examined. Since the resonant peaks are narrow (Fig. 1), a brief convergence study or at least a statement of the numerical parameters and estimated errors is needed to establish that the reported peak positions and ellipticity values are converged TDSE results rather than artifacts of the discretization.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2)] The definitions of E_x and E_y in Eq. (2) are garbled in the manuscript text; please provide clear expressions with the envelope function f(t) properly displayed.
  2. [Sec. II, after Eq. (3)] The intensity is given as '10 14 W/cm^2'; please format it as 10^14 W/cm^2 and also state the corresponding intensity in atomic units used in the calculations.
  3. [Sec. V, around Eq. (15)] The phrase 'for 0.1 0 = - < L epsilon' contains a typographical error; it should read 'for epsilon_L = -0.1'.
  4. [Fig. 3; Sec. V] The reference to 'Fig. 3d' is ambiguous because the figures have no visible subpanel labels in the text; please add subpanel labels (a), (b), (c), (d) to all multi-panel figures and refer to them consistently.
  5. [Sec. V and Sec. VI] The sentence in Sec. V stating that 'the calculation of multiphoton matrix elements is beyond the scope of this work' is an important limitation and should be restated prominently in the conclusion, with a clear statement that the analytic model is qualitative and not a complete derivation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central high-ellipticity result is a numerical TDSE output, and the analytic discussion is a post-hoc decomposition, not the derivation of that output.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is produced by direct numerical integration of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (Eq. 1) with two model potentials (Eqs. 8–9). The observation that harmonic ellipticity exceeds laser ellipticity at particular frequencies is read off the computed spectra (Figs. 1–2), not derived from the analytic rate equations of Section V. The analytic model in Section V is explicitly limited (“The calculation of multiphoton matrix elements is beyond the scope of this work”) and uses populations taken from the same simulation (e.g., Eq. 15 with the ratio 0.47 from Fig. 3d) to rationalize the numerically observed ellipticity; this is a consistency and explanation step, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction or a definitional equivalence. The model potentials are adjusted only to the 1s, 2s, and 2p energies, while the resonances responsible for the effect are higher d-states, so the salient predictions are not forced by the fitting inputs. Self-citations [5,14,21] provide background and prior polarization-control techniques, but none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the load-bearing justification for the present numerical results. The universality claim is supported only by the two single-active-electron models, which is a model-validation limitation, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on model helium atoms rather than full helium: two effective potentials are fitted to the three lowest energy levels, and a single active electron is assumed. The numerical TDSE results have no published convergence or error analysis. The analytical mechanism in Section V adds a multiphoton rate ansatz with unknown matrix elements and uses a population ratio extracted from the simulation. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • 2D model potential parameter alpha (Eq. 8) = alpha = 8.125, with screening coefficients 6, 82, 0.6, 0.0001, 0.01
    Adjusted so the model's 1s, 2s, and 2p energies match real helium energies; this is a fitted model parameter, not derived.
  • 3D model potential parameters (Eq. 9) = exponential coefficients 4 and 2
    Chosen so the 3D model's 1s, 2s, and 2p energies approximate real helium; the fit is only to three levels.
  • Simulated population ratio C(3d,m=2)^2 / C(3d,m=-2)^2 = about 0.47
    Read from Fig. 3d and used in Eq. (15) to estimate the |m|=2 contribution to the 3rd harmonic ellipticity; it comes from the same simulation being explained, not an independent calculation.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Single-active-electron approximation for helium
    Section II reduces helium to one active electron in potentials (8) and (9); ignores two-electron correlation, which could affect resonant transitions and dynamic Stark shifts.
  • domain assumption Numerical convergence of split-operator FFT TDSE
    Section II gives the method but no grid size, time step, box size, absorbing boundary, or convergence tests; the reported spectra and ellipticities assume these choices are accurate.
  • domain assumption Ground-state population is approximately constant and unity
    Section V, after Eq. (14), assumes weak excitation and ionization (a few percent) so the lower level population can be set to 1; this is used in the multiphoton rate equations.
  • domain assumption Multiphoton transition rate factorizes into mode populations and matrix elements
    Section V, Eqs. (10)-(12), asserts the rate is proportional to products of photon numbers in each circular mode and a multiphoton matrix element; no derivation of this perturbative ansatz is given.
  • standard math Matrix elements for m=+2 and m=-2 have equal squares
    Used in Eq. (15) to reduce the depopulation-rate ratio to the population ratio times a mode factor; follows from rotational and reflection symmetry with the quantization axis along propagation.
  • domain assumption Initially unpopulated harmonic modes can be treated with vacuum occupation 1/2
    Section V, before Eq. (12), substitutes vacuum value 1/2 for harmonic mode photon number and zero harmonic ellipticity at the start of emission.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-ellipticity resonant below-threshold harmonic generation by a helium atom driven by a moderately intense elliptically polarized laser field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PL4VRVKJ

@misc{pith2026241207346,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-ellipticity resonant below-threshold harmonic generation by a helium atom driven by a moderately intense elliptically polarized laser field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PL4VRVKJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07346}
}
read the original abstract

The below-threshold harmonic generation in the multiphoton ionization regime for a helium atom driven by the elliptically polarized laser field is studied numerically within the framework of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) models. It is shown that, regardless of the specific type of atomic potential and the model dimensionality, there is a set of laser frequencies, at which the harmonic generation efficiency increases dramatically with a simultaneous increase of their ellipticity. In these cases, the harmonic ellipticity can exceed the laser ellipticity by 2 or more times in absolute value. It is shown that the efficiency of harmonic generation in this interaction regime depends weakly or almost does not depend on the laser ellipticity. The pathways leading to resonant emission of intense harmonics with increased ellipticities are identified. The enhancement of the ellipticity of these harmonics is explained in terms of relative probabilities of resonant transitions in an elliptically polarized laser field for different values of the magnetic quantum number.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07346 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Dependence of the spectral intensity of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Dependence of the spectral intensity of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Projections of the electron wave function o [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Same as in Fig. 3, but for a laser frequenc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Pathways of 4-photon population of the uppe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows all possible pathways of 2-photon depopulation of the upper resonant state with generation of the 3rd harmonic. It is worth noting that, again according to the law of con￾servation of angular momentum, states with |m| = 2 can be depopulated only with the emission…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Taking this into account, the expression for the rate of 4-photon excitation of an atom in an elliptically polarized field takes the following form: ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 2 2(4) 4 1 3 ( ) 1 3 ( ) 3 ( ) 1 1 L s d m s d m d m L W t d N C t − −   −=   +  γ εα ε , (10) where α is a constant, (4) 1 3 ( ) −s d m d is the 4-photon matrix element, γ is the number o...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Pfeifer, C

    T. Pfeifer, C. Spielmann, and G. Gerber, Femtosecon d x-ray science, Rep. Prog. Phys. 69, 443 (2006)

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    J. Miao, T. Ishikawa, I.K. Robinson, and M.M. Murna ne, Beyond crystallography: Diffractive imaging using coherent x-ray light sources, Science 348, 530 (2015)

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Young et al., Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics, J

    L. Young et al., Roadmap of ultrafast x-ray atomic and molecular physics, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51 , 032003 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Winterfeldt, C

    C. Winterfeldt, C. Spielmann, and G. Gerber, Colloquium: Optimal control of high-harmonic generation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 , 117 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Strelkov, V.T

    V.V. Strelkov, V.T. Platonenko, A.F. Sterzhantov, a nd M.Yu. Ryabikin, Attosecond elec- tromagnetic pulses: generation, measurement, and ap plication. Generation of high-order harmonics of an intense laser field for attosecond pulse production, Phys. Usp. 59 , 425 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    McPherson, G

    A. McPherson, G. Gibson, H. Jara, U. Johann, T.S. L uk, I.A. McIntyre, K. Boyer, and C.K. Rhodes, Studies of multiphoton production of vacuum -ultraviolet radiation in the rare gases, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 595 (1987)

    work page 1987

  8. [8]

    Ferray, A

    M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X.F. Li, L.A. Lompré, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, Multiple- harmonic conversion of 1064 nm radiation in rare ga ses, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 21 , L31 (1988)

    work page 1988

Show all 24 references
  1. [9]

    Yost, T.R

    D.C. Yost, T.R. Schibli, J. Ye, J.L. Tate, J. Hoste tter, M.B. Gaarde, and K.J. Schafer, Vacu- um-ultraviolet frequency combs from below-threshold harmonics, Nat. Phys. 5, 815 (2009)

    2009

  2. [10]

    Chini, X

    M. Chini, X. Wang, Y. Cheng, H. Wang, Y. Wu, E. Cun ningham, P.-C. Li, J. Heslar, D.A. Telnov, S.-I. Chu, and Z. Chang, Coherent phase-mat ched VUV generation by field- controlled bound states, Nat. Photonics 8, 437 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Xiong, L.-Y

    W.-H. Xiong, L.-Y. Peng, and Q. Gong, Recent progre ss of below-threshold harmonic generation, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 50 , 032001 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Böwering, T

    N. Böwering, T. Lischke, B. Schmidtke, N. Müller, T . Khalil, and U. Heinzmann, Asymmetry in photoelectron emission from chiral mol ecules induced by circularly polarized light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 , 1187 (2001)

    2001

  5. [13]

    Ferré, C

    A. Ferré, C. Handschin, M. Dumergue, F. Burgy, A. C omby, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, G.A. Garcia, R. Géneaux, L. Merceron, E. Mével, L. Nahon, S. Petit, B. Pons, D. Staedter, S. Weber, T. Ruchon, V. Blanchet, and Y. Mairesse, A table-top ultrashort light source in the extreme ultr...

    2015

  6. [14]

    Budil, P

    K.S. Budil, P. Salières, A. L’Huillier, T. Ditmire, and M.D. Perry, Influence of ellipticity on harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. A 48 , R3437 (1993)

    1993

  7. [15]

    Strelkov, M.A

    V.V. Strelkov, M.A. Khokhlova, A.A. Gonoskov, I.A. Gonoskov, and M.Yu. Ryabikin, High-order harmonic generation by atoms in elliptic ally-polarized laser field: harmonic po- larization properties and laser threshold ellipticity, Phys. Rev. A 86 , 013404 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    X. Zhou, R. Lock, N. Wagner, W. Li, H.C. Kapteyn, a nd M.M. Murnane, Elliptically po- larized high-order harmonic emission from molecules in linearly polarized laser fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 , 073902 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    Vodungbo, A.B

    B. Vodungbo, A.B. Sardinha, J. Gautier, G. Lambert, C. Valentin, M. Lozano, G. Iaquaniello, F. Delmotte, S. Sebban, J. Lüning, and P. Zeitoun, Polarization control of high order harmonics in the EUV photon energy range, Opt. Express 19 , 4346 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Lambert, B

    G. Lambert, B. Vodungbo, J. Gautier, B. Mahieu, V. Malka, S. Sebban, P. Zeitoun, J. Luning, J. Perron, A. Andreev, S. Stremoukhov, F. A rdana-Lamas, A. Dax, C.P. Hauri, A. Sardinha, and M. Fajardo, Towards enabling femtosec ond helicity-dependent spectroscopy with high-harmoni...

    2015

  11. [19]

    Fleischer, O

    A. Fleischer, O. Kfir, T. Diskin, P. Sidorenko, and O. Cohen, Spin angular momentum and tunable polarization in high-harmonic generation, Nat. Photonics 8, 543 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    O. Kfir, P. Grychtol, E. Turgut, R. Knut, D. Zusin, D. Popmintchev, T. Popmintchev, H. Nembach, J.M. Shaw, A. Fleischer, H. Kapteyn, M. Mu rnane, and O. Cohen, Generation of bright phase-matched circularly polarized extreme u ltraviolet high harmonics, Nat. Photon- ics 9, 99 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    Hickstein, F.J

    D.D. Hickstein, F.J. Dollar, P. Grychtol, J.L. Elli s, R. Knut, C. Hernández-García, D. Zusin, C. Gentry, J.M. Shaw, T. Fan, K.M. Dorney, A . Becker, A. Jaron-Becker, H.C. Kapteyn, M.M. Murnane, and C.G. Durfee, Nat. Photonics 9, 743 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Khokhlova, M.Yu

    M.A. Khokhlova, M.Yu. Emelin, M.Yu. Ryabikin, and V .V. Strelkov. Polarization con- trol of quasimonochromatic XUV light produced via r esonant high-order harmonic genera- tion, Phys. Rev. A 103 , 043114 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Fleck, J.R

    J.A. Fleck, J.R. Morris, and M.D. Feit, Time-depend ent propagation of high energy laser beams through the atmosphere, Appl. Phys. 10 , 129 (1976)

    1976

  16. [24]

    Burnett, V.C

    K. Burnett, V.C. Reed, J. Cooper, and P.L. Knight, Calculation of the background emitted during high-harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. A 45 , 3347 (1992)

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.