Human Behavior Simulation: Objectives, Methodologies, and Open Problems

Jin Depeng; Li Nian; Li Yong; Long Qingyue; Yu Fudan; Yu Zihan; Zhang Guozhen

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 242 references

Human Behavior Simulation: Objectives, Methodologies, and Open Problems

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey organizes the young field of human behavior simulation into four behavior types and two objectives, then maps which method combinations are mature and which are open.

desk verdict A useful but uneven survey: the target-based taxonomy is the real contribution, and the gap tables should be read as a heuristic, not a reproducible result. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.07788 v1 pith:YOYINHXG submitted 2024-11-26 cs.HC

Zhang Guozhen , Yu Zihan , Li Nian , Yu Fudan , Long Qingyue , Jin Depeng , Li Yong This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.HC

keywords humanbehaviorsimulationsurveytaxonomylargelanguagemodelsagent-basedmodelingsocialforcemodelopiniondynamicsdecision-making

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey argues that the scattered field of human behavior simulation can be usefully organized by what is being simulated rather than by method or discipline. It sorts research into four behavior families — cognitive, physiological, social, and economic — and records, for each family, whether simulation serves scientific discovery or decision-making, at microscopic or macroscopic scale. The result is a maturity map: physiological behavior is the most studied and most method-rich, cognitive behavior is the least, and large language model agents are emerging as a new modeling paradigm across all four families. The paper's value is the map itself: it gives researchers a shared vocabulary and shows which combinations of behavior, objective, and method are crowded and which are empty. If the map is accurate, it points newcomers toward open problems such as joint multi-behavior simulation, multi-scale simulation, and simulation under abnormal conditions.

What carries the argument

The organizing device is a two-dimensional taxonomy: four behavior types (cognitive, physiological, social, economic) crossed with two objectives (scientific discovery vs. decision-making) and two perspectives (microscopic individual vs. macroscopic group). The paper presents this as Tables 1 and 2, with shading showing the number of works per cell. The second machinery is a methodological trichotomy — knowledge-driven, data-driven, and knowledge-and-data co-driven models — which the paper uses to explain how each behavior family has evolved and to locate LLM-based agents as the newest co-driven paradigm. This taxonomy is what carries the argument: it is the framework that makes the gap analysis possible.

What would settle it

Run a systematic literature search for each cell in Tables 1 and 2, for example microscopic emotion simulation for decision-making or macroscopic creativity simulation. If substantial existing work appears in cells the survey marks empty, the comprehensiveness claim fails; if the blank cells stay blank, the gap analysis holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that it provides the first systematic survey to classify human behavior simulation by simulation target. It defines a taxonomy of four behavior types — cognitive behavior (reasoning, emotion, creativity, politico-religious behavior), physiological behavior (movement, driving, transitions, resource usage), social behavior (connection formation, influence, cooperation and competition), and economic behavior (work, entertainment, market) — and a two-part objective split: simulation as a scientific tool for understanding behavior, and simulation as an environment for decision-making. Across these categories it identifies a consistent methodological progression: knowledge-driven models (social force, percolation, opinion dynamics) come first, data-driven models (RNN, GCN, GAN, RL, GAIL) follow, and knowledge-and-data co-driven models, including LLM-based agents, are the current frontier. The survey claims this perspective reveals that physiological behavior simulation is the most mature, cognitive behavior simulation is the least data-driven and most idealized, and the most valuable future problems are joint simulation of multiple behaviors, multi-scale simulation linking individual and aggregate levels, and simulation of abnormal scenarios.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's whole map rests on the selection of cited papers being representative; the authors say they are not exhaustive and exclude behaviors with few simulated works, so if the selection skews toward certain disciplines, the gap analysis would mislead.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Researchers can transplant mature methods from physiological behavior (e.g., social force models, trajectory generation) to less mature cognitive and economic domains, since the survey identifies the analogous problem formulations.
Decision-making applications can adopt LLM-based agents where data is scarce, since the survey shows LLM heterogeneity and reasoning working across all four behavior families.
The blank cells in Tables 1 and 2 become a concrete research agenda, for example microscopic creativity simulation for decision-making, which the survey marks as open.
The consistency of methodological progression across disciplines suggests that a new behavior family will first receive knowledge-driven models, then data-driven models, then co-driven models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The taxonomy could be tested bibliometrically: if the survey's selection is representative, a full-text search of the four behavior terms should find the same maturity ranking, with physiological ahead of social and economic, and cognitive last.
The paper's frontier claims imply that LLM-based simulation, while flexible, carries unresolved efficiency and robustness costs; a natural extension is evaluating LLM agents against existing car-following or opinion-dynamics benchmarks to measure their accuracy gain over knowledge-driven baselines.
The blank-cell argument suggests that new research effort in cognitive behavior simulation would face a relatively open field, but the paper does not quantify publication volume, so that openness is an inference from the shading tables rather than a counted claim.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague — this survey is worth sending to referees, but I'd brace them for a sloppy middle section. The genuinely new thing is the organization by simulation target — cognitive, physiological, social, economic behavior — crossed with objective and micro/macro perspective. That framing is useful for people entering the area, and the LLM-era coverage is current. The method discussion (knowledge-driven, data-driven, co-driven, LLM agents) is competent and gives a fair map of the toolbox. I agree with the reader's ACCEPT verdict; this is a legitimate review contribution.

The soft spots are mostly editorial, but they cluster in the section that is supposed to carry the paper's analytic weight. Section 3.5 contains a garbled sentence ('social, economic, and social behavior') and an orphaned definition of physiological behavior. The exclusion rule is stated but underspecified — 'behaviors with few works simulating it are not included' without a count or protocol — so the blank cells in Tables 1 and 2 are a heuristic pattern, not a reproducible gap analysis. The paper should say that plainly. There is also a genuine mis-citation: the sentence about NLP maturity cites [100,101], which are hate-speech and opinion-dynamics papers, not LLM/NLP-technique papers. That should be fixed.

Where I part from the stress-test note: I don't think the instability of the selection rule is load-bearing enough to reject. The tables are explicitly non-exhaustive, and the qualitative conclusions survive even if a row boundary shifts. The Entertainment row is ambiguous because the text says offline entertainment is excluded while the table just says 'Entertainment,' but the cited works are uniformly online, so that inconsistency is cosmetic. The self-citation rate is noticeable but not abusive; the authors cite their own relevant crowd-simulation and LLM-agent work where appropriate.

For peer review: yes, send it. A careful referee should ask for a tightened Section 3.5, a one-paragraph operational definition of inclusion, and a fix to the [100,101] citation. The intended audience — grad students and practitioners looking for a map of the field — will get real value even with those flaws.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper is a survey of human behavior simulation. It proposes a taxonomy of four behavior types (cognitive, physiological, social, economic), two simulation objectives (scientific discovery and decision-making), two perspectives (microscopic and macroscopic), and three methodological families (knowledge-driven, data-driven, and knowledge-data co-driven). It catalogs representative works in two tables, discusses canonical methods (social force model, percolation, opinion dynamics, RNN, GCN, GAN, RL, GAIL, knowledge-infused learning, and LLM agents), and concludes with open problems. The central claim is that this is the first updated, comprehensive cross-disciplinary survey of human behavior simulation and that its tables reveal the gaps and opportunities for high-impact research.

Significance. The manuscript is useful as a structured map of a fragmented field. Its strengths are the breadth of the reference set, the explicit four-behavior taxonomy, the two-objective organization of Tables 1 and 2, and the discussion of LLM-based agents as a new methodological wave. It does not present derivations or new empirical results, and its contribution is organizational rather than falsifiable. If the taxonomy and table-construction rules are made precise, the paper could serve as a common vocabulary for researchers in transportation, computational social science, and recommender systems.

major comments (2)

[Section 3 and Tables 1-2] The inclusion rule for the survey is not operational. The text says 'we do not intend to be exhaustive... those behaviors with few works simulating it are not included,' but it never defines what counts as a behavior, how many works qualify as 'few,' or how a given work is assigned to a behavior row, objective column, and perspective cell. Because the blank cells in Tables 1 and 2 are the evidence for the gap analysis in Section 5, this selection rule is load-bearing. Please provide the operational criteria used to build the tables, or explicitly reframe the tables as an illustrative sample rather than a comprehensive gap map.
[Section 3.5] The summary sentence 'simulation studies of social, economic, and social behavior are more developed' is internally inconsistent (social is listed twice), and the intended contrast with the preceding cognitive-behavior sentence is unclear; presumably 'physiological' was meant. This sentence is the section's main takeaway and should be corrected. The following orphaned sentence defining physiological behaviors is also misplaced here; it belongs in Section 2, where the taxonomy is introduced.

minor comments (6)

[Table 2] In the Work row, reference [160] appears twice; the duplicate should be removed.
[Section 3.2.1] There are typos in this section: 'utility fuctions' should be 'utility functions' and 'netowks' should be 'networks'.
[Section 4.2.5] The phrase 'By combining these two processes, In this way, GAIL can learn...' is grammatically tangled and should be rewritten.
[Section 4.1.1] The sentence beginning 'A pedestiran wants to reach...' contains a typo; also, the final sentence of the paragraph has awkward punctuation after 'calibrate'.
[Tables 1 and 2] The caption says that darker shading means more related works, but no quantitative or ordinal scale is given; please ensure the shading is legible in grayscale print or replace it with an explicit count or rank.
[Abstract and Section 3] The abstract and Section 1 describe the survey as 'comprehensive,' while Section 3 states that the authors do not intend to be exhaustive; the wording should be reconciled so readers know the intended scope.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a survey whose taxonomy and gap analysis summarize external literature; no prediction is derived from fitted inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a survey, not a derivation. It makes no quantitative predictions and fits no parameters to data, so the primary circularity patterns (self-definitional inference, fitted input called prediction, uniqueness imported from authors, ansatz smuggled via citation) have no purchase. The central contribution is a taxonomy of human behaviors (cognitive, physiological, social, economic) and a literature-organized summary in Tables 1 and 2. The taxonomy is presented as a classification drawn from external references and standard definitions, not derived from the surveyed outcomes. The gap analysis is explicitly based on an incomplete selection of works ('Note that we do not intend to be exhaustive in this survey, and thus those behaviors with few works simulating it are not included in this section'), which is a scope limitation that may affect representativeness but does not make the survey's claims equivalent to its inputs. The authors do cite their own prior works (e.g., S3, physics-infused crowd simulation, LLM macroeconomics), but these citations are used as examples of research directions among many independent external works, and the survey's organizational claims do not stand or fall on those self-citations. No equation in the paper is shown to reduce to its own output, and no 'prediction' is renamed from a fitted value. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a literature organization, so the main load-bearing premises are the adequacy of the behavior taxonomy and the representativeness of the cited corpus.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption The taxonomy of human behavior into cognitive, physiological, social, and economic behavior is a valid organizing scheme that covers the reviewed literature.
Used throughout Sections 3 and 4; if behaviors do not fit this taxonomy, the survey's structure misrepresents the field.
domain assumption The selected cited works are representative enough to support the survey's generalizations about methods and objectives.
The survey calls itself comprehensive yet states in Section 3 "we do not intend to be exhaustive"; the generalizations depend on the selection being unbiased.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Human Behavior Simulation: Objectives, Methodologies, and Open Problems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YOYINHXG

@misc{pith2026241207788,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Human Behavior Simulation: Objectives, Methodologies, and Open Problems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YOYINHXG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.07788}
}

read the original abstract

In recent years, human behavior simulation has drawn increasing attention from both academia and industry. The reasons fall into two aspects. First, simulation serves as a critical tool for understanding human behaviors, which has become one of the most important research topics in the history. Second, researchers have gradually reached a consensus that simulation, especially human behavior simulation, is critical for real-world decision-making systems. As a result, lots of human behavior simulation research and applications have sprung up across numerous disciplines in the past few years. In addition to the traditional methods, such as building mathematical and physical models, leveraging the recent advances of deep learning techniques -- especially the nascent Large Language Model technology -- for accurate human behavior simulation has also been one of the hottest research topics. In this study, we provide a comprehensive review of the latest research advancements in human behavior simulation. We summarize the objectives, problem formulations, and commonly used methods and discuss the consistency in the development of related research in different disciplines, which reveals the gaps and opportunities for high-impact research in this promising direction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.07788 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** The illustration of cognitive behavior simulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The illustration of Physiological behavior simulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The illustration of social behavior simulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The illustration of economic behavior simulation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The development status of each research field in terms of methodologies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

242 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

[1]

Introduction to simulation

Jerry Banks. Introduction to simulation. In Proceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation— a bridge to the future-Volume 1, pages 7–13, 1999

1999
[2]

A guide to simulation

Paul Bratley, Bennet L Fox, and Linus E Schrage. A guide to simulation. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

2011
[3]

Molecular dynamics simulation for all

Scott A Hollingsworth and Ron O Dror. Molecular dynamics simulation for all. Neuron, 99(6):1129–1143, 2018

2018
[4]

Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics

William L Oberkampf and Timothy G Trucano. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Progress in aerospace sciences, 38(3):209–272, 2002

2002
[5]

Multi-scale modelling and simulation in systems biology

Joseph O Dada and Pedro Mendes. Multi-scale modelling and simulation in systems biology. Integrative Biology, 3(2):86–96, 2011

2011
[6]

Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology

Ron O Dror, Robert M Dirks, JP Grossman, Huafeng Xu, and David E Shaw. Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology. Annu. rev. biophys, 41(1):429–452, 2012. 20

2012
[7]

A review of physics simulators for robotic applications

Jack Collins, Shelvin Chand, Anthony Vanderkop, and David Howard. A review of physics simulators for robotic applications. IEEE Access, 9:51416–51431, 2021

2021
[8]

The benefits of global high resolution for climate simulation: process understanding and the enabling of stakeholder decisions at the regional scale

MJ Roberts, PL Vidale, C Senior, HT Hewitt, C Bates, S Berthou, P Chang, HM Christensen, S Danilov, M-E Demory, et al. The benefits of global high resolution for climate simulation: process understanding and the enabling of stakeholder decisions at the regional scale. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 99(11):2341–2359, 2018

2018

Show all 242 references

[9]

Skilful precipitation nowcasting using deep generative models of radar

Suman Ravuri, Karel Lenc, Matthew Willson, Dmitry Kangin, Remi Lam, Piotr Mirowski, Megan Fitzsimons, Maria Athanassiadou, Sheleem Kashem, Sam Madge, et al. Skilful precipitation nowcasting using deep generative models of radar. Nature, 597(7878):672–677, 2021

2021
[10]

High-order computational fluid dynamics tools for aircraft design

ZJ Wang. High-order computational fluid dynamics tools for aircraft design. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2022):20130318, 2014

2022
[11]

Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery

Jacob D Durrant and J Andrew McCammon. Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery. BMC biology, 9(1):1–9, 2011

2011
[12]

Simulation-based decision support tool for early stages of zero-energy building design

Shady Attia, Elisabeth Gratia, André De Herde, and Jan LM Hensen. Simulation-based decision support tool for early stages of zero-energy building design. Energy and buildings, 49:2–15, 2012

2012
[13]

The community earth system model: a framework for collaborative research

James W Hurrell, Marika M Holland, Peter R Gent, Steven Ghan, Jennifer E Kay, Paul J Kushner, J-F Lamarque, William G Large, D Lawrence, Keith Lindsay, et al. The community earth system model: a framework for collaborative research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Soci...

2013
[14]

Catlow C R A., Aron Walsh, and Alexey A. Sokol. Computational approaches to Energy Materials. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2013

2013
[15]

Mastering the game of go without human knowledge

David Silver, Julian Schrittwieser, Karen Simonyan, Ioannis Antonoglou, Aja Huang, Arthur Guez, Thomas Hubert, Lucas Baker, Matthew Lai, Adrian Bolton, et al. Mastering the game of go without human knowledge. nature, 550(7676):354–359, 2017

2017
[16]

A review on crowd simulation and modeling

Shanwen Yang, Tianrui Li, Xun Gong, Bo Peng, and Jie Hu. A review on crowd simulation and modeling. Graphical Models, 111:101081, 2020

2020
[17]

Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities

David MJ Lazer, Alex Pentland, Duncan J Watts, Sinan Aral, Susan Athey, Noshir Contractor, Deen Freelon, Sandra Gonzalez-Bailon, Gary King, Helen Margetts, et al. Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities. Science, 369(6507):1060–1062, 2020

2020
[18]

Ai for social good: unlocking the opportunity for positive impact

Nenad Tomašev, Julien Cornebise, Frank Hutter, Shakir Mohamed, Angela Picciariello, Bec Connelly, Danielle Belgrave, Daphne Ezer, Fanny Cachat van der Haert, Frank Mugisha, et al. Ai for social good: unlocking the opportunity for positive impact. Nature Communications, 11(1):1–6, 2020

2020
[19]

Simulation intelligence: Towards a new generation of scientific methods

Alexander Lavin, Hector Zenil, Brooks Paige, David Krakauer, Justin Gottschlich, Tim Mattson, Anima Anandkumar, Sanjay Choudry, Kamil Rocki, Atılım Güne¸ s Baydin, et al. Simulation intelligence: Towards a new generation of scientific methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.03235, 2021

2021 arXiv
[20]

Large language models empowered agent-based modeling and simulation: A survey and perspectives

Chen Gao, Xiaochong Lan, Nian Li, Yuan Yuan, Jingtao Ding, Zhilun Zhou, Fengli Xu, and Yong Li. Large language models empowered agent-based modeling and simulation: A survey and perspectives. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11970, 2023

2023 arXiv
[21]

s3: Social-network simulation system with large language model-empowered agents

Chen Gao, Xiaochong Lan, Zhihong Lu, Jinzhu Mao, Jinghua Piao, Huandong Wang, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. s3: Social-network simulation system with large language model-empowered agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.14984, 2023

2023 arXiv
[22]

Unleashing cognitive synergy in large language models: A task-solving agent through multi-persona selfcollaboration

Zhenhailong Wang, Shaoguang Mao, Wenshan Wu, Tao Ge, Furu Wei, and Heng Ji. Unleashing cognitive synergy in large language models: A task-solving agent through multi-persona selfcollaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05300, 1(2):3, 2023

2023 arXiv
[23]

Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior

Joon Sung Park, Joseph O’Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S Bernstein. Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 1–22, 2023

2023
[24]

Robotic navigation with large pre-trained models of language

Dhruv Shah, Blazej Osinski, Brian Ichter, and Sergey Levine. Robotic navigation with large pre-trained models of language. Vision, and Action. arXiv, 2022

2022
[25]

Gnm: A general navigation model to drive any robot

Dhruv Shah, Ajay Sridhar, Arjun Bhorkar, Noriaki Hirose, and Sergey Levine. Gnm: A general navigation model to drive any robot. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 7226–7233. IEEE, 2023. 21

2023
[26]

Ghost in the minecraft: Generally capable agents for open-world enviroments via large language models with text-based knowledge and memory

Xizhou Zhu, Yuntao Chen, Hao Tian, Chenxin Tao, Weijie Su, Chenyu Yang, Gao Huang, Bin Li, Lewei Lu, Xiaogang Wang, et al. Ghost in the minecraft: Generally capable agents for open-world enviroments via large language models with text-based knowledge and memory. arXiv preprint...

2023 arXiv
[27]

Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning

Noah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik R Narasimhan, and Shunyu Yao. Reflexion: Language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023

2023
[28]

Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study

Friederike Wall. Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study. Review of Managerial Science, 10(1):135–193, 2016

2016
[29]

Agent-based models in sociology

Federico Bianchi and Flaminio Squazzoni. Agent-based models in sociology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 7(4):284–306, 2015

2015
[30]

Perspectives and relationships in supply chain simulation: A systematic literature review

Josenildo Brito Oliveira, Renato Silva Lima, and José Arnaldo Barra Montevechi. Perspectives and relationships in supply chain simulation: A systematic literature review. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 62:166– 191, 2016

2016
[31]

Science and human behavior

Burrhus Frederic Skinner. Science and human behavior. Simon and Schuster, 1965

1965
[32]

What makes human cognition unique? from individual to shared to collective intentionality

Michael Tomasello and Hannes Rakoczy. What makes human cognition unique? from individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind & language, 18(2):121–147, 2003

2003
[33]

Clair, William J Sutherland, et al

Steven J Cooke, Daniel T Blumstein, Richard Buchholz, Tim Caro, Esteban Fernandez-Juricic, Craig E Franklin, Julian Metcalfe, Constance M O’Connor, Colleen Cassady St. Clair, William J Sutherland, et al. Physiology, behavior, and conservation. Physiological and Biochemical Zoo...

2014
[34]

Work & human behavior

Walter S Neff. Work & human behavior. Routledge, 2017

2017
[35]

Roots of human sociality

Nicholas J Enfield and Stephen C Levinson. Roots of human sociality. New York: Berg, 2006

2006
[36]

Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction

Jonathan St BT Evans, Stephen E Newstead, and Ruth MJ Byrne. Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Psychology Press, 1993

1993
[37]

Emotion: A very short introduction

Dylan Evans. Emotion: A very short introduction. OUP Oxford, 2003

2003
[38]

The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity

Mark Turner. The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity. Oxford University Press, 2006

2006
[39]

Faith and politics: The influence of religious beliefs on political participation

Robyn Driskell, Elizabeth Embry, and Larry Lyon. Faith and politics: The influence of religious beliefs on political participation. Social Science Quarterly, 89(2):294–314, 2008

2008
[40]

Personality and social behavior

Mark Snyder and William Ickes. Personality and social behavior. Handbook of social psychology, 2(3):883–947, 1985

1985
[41]

Research handbook on behavioral law and economics

Joshua C Teitelbaum and Kathryn Zeiler. Research handbook on behavioral law and economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018

2018
[42]

Unified theories of cognition

Allen Newell. Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press, 1994

1994
[43]

How does the heterogeneity of members affect the evolution of group opinions? Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, 2021

An Lu, Haifeng Ling, and Zhengping Ding. How does the heterogeneity of members affect the evolution of group opinions? Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021, 2021

2021
[44]

Hate speech epidemic

Michał Bilewicz and Wiktor Soral. Hate speech epidemic. the dynamic effects of derogatory language on intergroup relations and political radicalization. Political Psychology, 41:3–33, 2020

2020
[45]

Cascades of emotional support in friendship networks and adolescent smoking

Cynthia M Lakon, Cheng Wang, Carter T Butts, Rupa Jose, and John R Hipp. Cascades of emotional support in friendship networks and adolescent smoking. PloS one, 12(6):e0180204, 2017

2017
[46]

The diffusion of fear: Modeling community response to a terrorist strike

William J Burns and Paul Slovic. The diffusion of fear: Modeling community response to a terrorist strike. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 4(4):298–317, 2007

2007
[47]

Spread of hate speech in online social media

Binny Mathew, Ritam Dutt, Pawan Goyal, and Animesh Mukherjee. Spread of hate speech in online social media. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on web science, pages 173–182, 2019

2019
[48]

Sequential dynamics of complex networks in mind: Consciousness and creativity

Mikhail I Rabinovich, Michael A Zaks, and Pablo Varona. Sequential dynamics of complex networks in mind: Consciousness and creativity. Physics Reports, 883:1–32, 2020

2020
[49]

Network hubs cease to be influential in the presence of low levels of advertising

Gabriel Rossman and Jacob C Fisher. Network hubs cease to be influential in the presence of low levels of advertising. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(7):e2013391118, 2021

2021
[50]

Detecting and modelling real percolation and phase transitions of information on social media

Jiarong Xie, Fanhui Meng, Jiachen Sun, Xiao Ma, Gang Yan, and Yanqing Hu. Detecting and modelling real percolation and phase transitions of information on social media. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(9):1161–1168, 2021. 22

2021
[51]

Put your money where your mouth is: Dial, a dialogical model for opinion dynamics

Piter Dykstra, Corinna Elsenbroich, Wander Jager, Gerard Renardel de Lavalette, and Rineke Verbrugge. Put your money where your mouth is: Dial, a dialogical model for opinion dynamics. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16(3):4, 2013

2013
[52]

The echo chamber effect on social media

Matteo Cinelli, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 118(9):e2023301118, 2021

2021
[53]

Social force model for pedestrian dynamics.Physical Review E, 51(5):4282–4286, May 1995

Dirk Helbing and Péter Molnár. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics.Physical Review E, 51(5):4282–4286, May 1995

1995
[54]

Revealing the hidden rules of bidirectional pedestrian flow based on an improved floor field cellular automata model

Shuqi Xue, Feliciani Claudio, Xiaomeng Shi, and Tongfei Li. Revealing the hidden rules of bidirectional pedestrian flow based on an improved floor field cellular automata model. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 100:102044, 2020

2020
[55]

How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters

Mehdi Moussaïd, Dirk Helbing, and Guy Theraulaz. How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(17):6884–6888, 2011

2011
[56]

A continuum theory for the flow of pedestrians

Roger L Hughes. A continuum theory for the flow of pedestrians. Transportation Research Part B: Methodologi- cal, 36(6):507–535, 2002

2002
[57]

On the modelling crowd dynamics from scaling to hyperbolic macroscopic models

Nicola Bellomo and Christian Dogbe. On the modelling crowd dynamics from scaling to hyperbolic macroscopic models. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 18(supp01):1317–1345, 2008

2008
[58]

A higher-order macroscopic model for pedestrian flows

Yan-qun Jiang, Peng Zhang, SC Wong, and Ru-xun Liu. A higher-order macroscopic model for pedestrian flows. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(21):4623–4635, 2010

2010
[59]

A macroscopic crowd motion model of gradient flow type

Bertrand Maury, Aude Roudneff-Chupin, and Filippo Santambrogio. A macroscopic crowd motion model of gradient flow type. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 20(10):1787–1821, 2010

2010
[60]

Macroscopic modeling and simulations of room evacuation

Monika Twarogowska, Paola Goatin, and Regis Duvigneau. Macroscopic modeling and simulations of room evacuation. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(24):5781–5795, 2014

2014
[61]

Modelling and simulation of highly mixed traffic flow on two-lane two-way urban streets

Jian Sun, Han Liu, and Zian Ma. Modelling and simulation of highly mixed traffic flow on two-lane two-way urban streets. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 95:16–35, 2019

2019
[62]

A modified social force model for high-density through bicycle flow at mixed-traffic intersections

Yixin Li, Ying Ni, and Jian Sun. A modified social force model for high-density through bicycle flow at mixed-traffic intersections. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 108:102265, April 2021

2021
[63]

Modeling and simulation of overtaking events by heterogeneous non-motorized vehicles on shared roadway segments

Qiyuan Liu, Jian Sun, Ye Tian, and Lu Xiong. Modeling and simulation of overtaking events by heterogeneous non-motorized vehicles on shared roadway segments. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 103:102072, 2020

2020
[64]

Moha: A multi-mode hybrid automaton model for learning car-following behaviors

Qin Lin, Yihuan Zhang, Sicco Verwer, and Jun Wang. Moha: A multi-mode hybrid automaton model for learning car-following behaviors. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(2):790–796, 2019

2019
[65]

Risk field model of driving and its application in modeling car-following behavior

Haitian Tan, Guangquan Lu, and Miaomiao Liu. Risk field model of driving and its application in modeling car-following behavior. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(8):11605–11620, 2022

2022
[66]

Development of an asymmetric car-following model and simulation validation

Minju Park, Yeeun Kim, and Hwasoo Yeo. Development of an asymmetric car-following model and simulation validation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(8):3513–3524, 2020

2020
[67]

Roop, Avinash Malik, and Prakash Ranjitkar

Jin Woo Ro, Partha S. Roop, Avinash Malik, and Prakash Ranjitkar. A formal approach for modeling and simulation of human car-following behavior.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(2):639– 648, 2018

2018
[68]

Mecklenbräuker, and Gerald Ostermayer

Manuel Lindorfer, Christoph F. Mecklenbräuker, and Gerald Ostermayer. Modeling the imperfect driver: Incorporating human factors in a microscopic traffic model. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(9):2856–2870, 2018

2018
[69]

A novel asymmetric car following model for driver- assist enabled vehicle dynamics

Mingfeng Shang, Benjamin Rosenblad, and Raphael Stern. A novel asymmetric car following model for driver- assist enabled vehicle dynamics. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(9):15696–15706, 2022

2022
[70]

Risk representation, perception, and propensity in an integrated human lane-change decision model

Longsheng Jiang, Dong Chen, Zhaojian Li, and Yue Wang. Risk representation, perception, and propensity in an integrated human lane-change decision model. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(12):23474–23487, 2022

2022
[71]

Nan Li, Yu Yao, Ilya Kolmanovsky, Ella Atkins, and Anouck R. Girard. Game-theoretic modeling of multi- vehicle interactions at uncontrolled intersections. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(2):1428–1442, February 2022. 23

2022
[72]

González

Shan Jiang, Yingxiang Yang, Siddharth Gupta, Daniele Veneziano, Shounak Athavale, and Marta C. González. The timegeo modeling framework for urban mobility without travel surveys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(37):E5370–E5378, 2016

2016
[73]

Insights into population behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic from cell phone mobility data and manifold learning

Roman Levin, Dennis L Chao, Edward A Wenger, and Joshua L Proctor. Insights into population behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic from cell phone mobility data and manifold learning. Nat. Comput. Sci., 1(9):588–597, September 2021

2021
[74]

Ferreira, Bruno Astuto A

Danielle L. Ferreira, Bruno Astuto A. Nunes, and Katia Obraczka. Scale-free properties of human mobility and applications to intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(11):3736–3748, 2018

2018
[75]

Gorelick

Jim Yoon, Christian Klassert, Philip Selby, Thibaut Lachaut, Stephen Knox, Nicolas Avisse, Julien Harou, Amaury Tilmant, Bernd Klauer, Daanish Mustafa, Katja Sigel, Samer Talozi, Erik Gawel, Josue Medellín- Azuara, Bushra Bataineh, Hua Zhang, and Steven M. Gorelick. A coupled ...

2021
[76]

Estimating city-level energy consumption of residential buildings: A life-cycle dynamic simulation model

Guijun Li, Chenhuan Kou, and Hao Wang. Estimating city-level energy consumption of residential buildings: A life-cycle dynamic simulation model. Journal of Environmental Management, 240:451–462, 2019

2019
[77]

Emergence of scaling in random networks.science, 286(5439):509–512, 1999

Albert-László Barabási and Réka Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks.science, 286(5439):509–512, 1999

1999
[78]

Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks

Aili Asikainen, Gerardo Iñiguez, Javier Ureña-Carrión, Kimmo Kaski, and Mikko Kivelä. Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks. Science Advances, 6(19):eaax7310, 2020

2020
[79]

Triadic closure as a basic generating mechanism of communities in complex networks

Ginestra Bianconi, Richard K Darst, Jacopo Iacovacci, and Santo Fortunato. Triadic closure as a basic generating mechanism of communities in complex networks. Physical Review E, 90(4):042806, 2014

2014
[80]

Dynamic models of segregation

Thomas C Schelling. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of mathematical sociology, 1(2):143–186, 1971

1971
[81]

Role of’vision’in neighbourhood racial segregation: a variant of the schelling segregation model

Alexander J Laurie and Narendra K Jaggi. Role of’vision’in neighbourhood racial segregation: a variant of the schelling segregation model. Urban Studies, 40(13):2687–2704, 2003

2003
[82]

Residential segregation in an all-integrationist world

Junfu Zhang. Residential segregation in an all-integrationist world. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organiza- tion, 54(4):533–550, 2004

2004
[83]

The role of social structure in the maintenance of cooperative regimes

Michael D Cohen, Rick L Riolo, and Robert Axelrod. The role of social structure in the maintenance of cooperative regimes. Rationality and Society, 13(1):5–32, 2001

2001
[84]

Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations

Martin A Nowak and Karl Sigmund. Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature, 355(6357):250–253, 1992

1992
[85]

Why bother with what others tell you? an experimental data-driven agent-based model

Riccardo Boero, Giangiacomo Bravo, Marco Castellani, Flaminio Squazzoni, et al. Why bother with what others tell you? an experimental data-driven agent-based model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 13(3):6, 2010

2010
[86]

Reputation in artificial societies: Social beliefs for social order, volume 6

Rosaria Conte and Mario Paolucci. Reputation in artificial societies: Social beliefs for social order, volume 6. Springer Science & Business Media, 2002

2002
[87]

Strong reciprocity and human sociality

Herbert Gintis. Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of theoretical biology, 206(2):169–179, 2000

2000
[88]

The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations

Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis. The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoretical population biology, 65(1):17–28, 2004

2004
[89]

The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model

Michael W Macy and John Skvoretz. The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model. American Sociological Review, pages 638–660, 1998

1998
[90]

Trust and partner selection in social networks: An experimentally grounded model

Giangiacomo Bravo, Flaminio Squazzoni, and Riccardo Boero. Trust and partner selection in social networks: An experimentally grounded model. Social Networks, 34(4):481–492, 2012

2012
[91]

Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation

Katrin Fehl, Daniel J van der Post, and Dirk Semmann. Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation. Ecology letters, 14(6):546–551, 2011

2011
[92]

Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: Market as a partial substitute for individual rationality

Dhananjay K Gode and Shyam Sunder. Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: Market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. Journal of political economy, 101(1):119–137, 1993

1993
[93]

Artificial economic life: a simple model of a stockmarket

Richard G Palmer, W Brian Arthur, John H Holland, Blake LeBaron, and Paul Tayler. Artificial economic life: a simple model of a stockmarket. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 75(1-3):264–274, 1994

1994
[94]

Less than human: Simple adaptive trading agents for cda markets.IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 31(16):117–122, 1998

Dave Cliff and Janet Bruten. Less than human: Simple adaptive trading agents for cda markets.IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 31(16):117–122, 1998. 24

1998
[95]

Decentralized, dispersed exchange without an auctioneer: A simulation study

Peter Albin and Duncan K Foley. Decentralized, dispersed exchange without an auctioneer: A simulation study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18(1):27–51, 1992

1992
[96]

The economy needs agent-based modelling

J Doyne Farmer and Duncan Foley. The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature, 460(7256):685–686, 2009

2009
[97]

Abides: Towards high-fidelity multi-agent market simulation

David Byrd, Maria Hybinette, and Tucker Hybinette Balch. Abides: Towards high-fidelity multi-agent market simulation. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSIM Conference on Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation, pages 11–22, 2020

2020
[98]

Multi-agent reinforcement learning in a realistic limit order book market simulation

Michaël Karpe, Jin Fang, Zhongyao Ma, and Chen Wang. Multi-agent reinforcement learning in a realistic limit order book market simulation. In Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, pages 1–7, 2020

2020
[99]

Ctmstou driven markets: simulated environment for regime-awareness in trading policies

Selim Amrouni, Aymeric Moulin, and Tucker Balch. Ctmstou driven markets: simulated environment for regime-awareness in trading policies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00941, 2022

2022 arXiv
[100]

On simulating the propagation and countermeasures of hate speech in social networks

Maite Lopez-Sanchez and Arthur Müller. On simulating the propagation and countermeasures of hate speech in social networks. Applied Sciences, 11(24):12003, 2021

2021
[101]

A two-step communication opinion dynamics model with self-persistence and influence index for social networks based on the degroot model

Qinyue Zhou, Zhibin Wu, Abdulrahman H Altalhi, and Francisco Herrera. A two-step communication opinion dynamics model with self-persistence and influence index for social networks based on the degroot model. Information Sciences, 519:363–381, 2020

2020
[102]

Opinion dynamics with backfire effect and biased assimilation

Xi Chen, Panayiotis Tsaparas, Jefrey Lijffijt, and Tijl De Bie. Opinion dynamics with backfire effect and biased assimilation. PloS one, 16(9):e0256922, 2021

2021
[103]

Link recommendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks

Fernando P Santos, Yphtach Lelkes, and Simon A Levin. Link recommendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(50):e2102141118, 2021

2021
[104]

Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks

Fabian Baumann, Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, Igor M Sokolov, and Michele Starnini. Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks. Physical Review Letters, 124(4):048301, 2020

2020
[105]

Simulating dynamical features of escape panic

Dirk Helbing, Illés Farkas, and Tamás Vicsek. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature, 407(6803):487–490, September 2000

2000
[106]

Social lstm: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces

Alexandre Alahi, Kratarth Goel, Vignesh Ramanathan, Alexandre Robicquet, Li Fei-Fei, and Silvio Savarese. Social lstm: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 961–971, June 2016

2016
[107]

Social gan: Socially acceptable trajectories with generative adversarial networks

Agrim Gupta, Justin Johnson, Li Fei-Fei, Silvio Savarese, and Alexandre Alahi. Social gan: Socially acceptable trajectories with generative adversarial networks. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2255–2264. IEEE, June 2018

2018
[108]

Social-stgcnn: A social spatio- temporal graph convolutional neural network for human trajectory prediction

Abduallah Mohamed, Kun Qian, Mohamed Elhoseiny, and Christian Claudel. Social-stgcnn: A social spatio- temporal graph convolutional neural network for human trajectory prediction. In 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 14412–14420,...

2020
[109]

Physics-infused machine learning for crowd simulation

Guozhen Zhang, Zihan Yu, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. Physics-infused machine learning for crowd simulation. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 2439–2449, 2022

2022
[110]

Understanding and modeling collision avoidance behavior for realistic crowd simulation

Zihan Yu, Guozhen Zhang, Yong Li, and Depeng Jin. Understanding and modeling collision avoidance behavior for realistic crowd simulation. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 3052–3061, 2023

2023
[111]

Aleksandr Saprykin, Ndaona Chokani, and Reza S. Abhari. Gemsim: A gpu-accelerated multi-modal mobility simulator for large-scale scenarios. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 94:199–214, 2019

2019
[112]

From traffic conflict simulation to traffic crash simulation: Introducing traffic safety indicators based on the explicit simulation of potential driver errors

Vittorio Astarita and Vincenzo Pasquale Giofré. From traffic conflict simulation to traffic crash simulation: Introducing traffic safety indicators based on the explicit simulation of potential driver errors. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 94:215–236, 2019

2019
[113]

Trafficsim: Learning to simulate realistic multi-agent behaviors

Simon Suo, Sebastian Regalado, Sergio Casas, and Raquel Urtasun. Trafficsim: Learning to simulate realistic multi-agent behaviors. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10400–10409, June 2021

2021
[114]

Learning to simulate self-driven particles system with coordinated policy optimization, January 2022

Zhenghao Peng, Quanyi Li, Ka Ming Hui, Chunxiao Liu, and Bolei Zhou. Learning to simulate self-driven particles system with coordinated policy optimization, January 2022. 25

2022
[115]

A systematic solution of human driving behavior modeling and simulation for automated vehicle studies

Kunpeng Zhang, Cheng Chang, Wenqin Zhong, Shen Li, Zhiheng Li, and Li Li. A systematic solution of human driving behavior modeling and simulation for automated vehicle studies. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(11):21944–21958, November 2022

2022
[116]

Short-term lateral behavior reasoning for target vehicles considering driver preview characteristic.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(8):11801–11810, 2022

Zhisong Zhou, Yafei Wang, Ronghui Liu, Chongfeng Wei, Haiping Du, and Chengliang Yin. Short-term lateral behavior reasoning for target vehicles considering driver preview characteristic.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(8):11801–11810, 2022

2022
[117]

Combined hierarchical learning framework for personalized automatic lane-changing

Bing Zhu, Jiayi Han, Jian Zhao, and Huaji Wang. Combined hierarchical learning framework for personalized automatic lane-changing. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(10):6275–6285, 2021

2021
[118]

A hybrid submicroscopic-microscopic traffic flow simulation framework

Freddy Antony Mullakkal-Babu, Meng Wang, Bart van Arem, Barys Shyrokau, and Riender Happee. A hybrid submicroscopic-microscopic traffic flow simulation framework. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(6):3430–3443, 2021

2021
[119]

Self-learning optimal cruise control based on individual car-following style

Hongqing Chu, Lulu Guo, Yongjun Yan, Bingzhao Gao, and Hong Chen. Self-learning optimal cruise control based on individual car-following style. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(10):6622– 6633, 2021

2021
[120]

Trajgen: Generating realistic and diverse trajectories with reactive and feasible agent behaviors for autonomous driving

Qichao Zhang, Yinfeng Gao, Yikang Zhang, Youtian Guo, Dawei Ding, Yunpeng Wang, Peng Sun, and Dongbin Zhao. Trajgen: Generating realistic and diverse trajectories with reactive and feasible agent behaviors for autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation...

2022
[121]

Game theoretic merging behavior control for autonomous vehicle at highway on-ramp

Chao Wei, Yuanhao He, Hanqing Tian, and Yanzhi Lv. Game theoretic merging behavior control for autonomous vehicle at highway on-ramp. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(11):21127–21136, November 2022

2022
[122]

Kruse, Ransalu Senanayake, and Mykel J

Raunak Bhattacharyya, Soyeon Jung, Liam A. Kruse, Ransalu Senanayake, and Mykel J. Kochenderfer. A hybrid rule-based and data-driven approach to driver modeling through particle filtering. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(8):13055–13068, 2022

2022
[123]

Rlmob: Deep reinforcement learning for successive mobility prediction

Ziyan Luo and Congcong Miao. Rlmob: Deep reinforcement learning for successive mobility prediction. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM ’22, page 648–656, New York, NY , USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery

2022
[124]

Learning to simulate human mobility

Jie Feng, Zeyu Yang, Fengli Xu, Haisu Yu, Mudan Wang, and Yong Li. Learning to simulate human mobility. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, KDD ’20, page 3426–3433, New York, NY , USA, 2020. Association for C...

2020
[125]

Activity trajectory generation via modeling spatiotemporal dynamics

Yuan Yuan, Jingtao Ding, Huandong Wang, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. Activity trajectory generation via modeling spatiotemporal dynamics. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’22, page 4752–4762, New York, NY , USA, 2022. Ass...

2022
[126]

Deep roi-based modeling for urban human mobility prediction

Renhe Jiang, Xuan Song, Zipei Fan, Tianqi Xia, Quanjun Chen, Qi Chen, and Ryosuke Shibasaki. Deep roi-based modeling for urban human mobility prediction. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2(1):14:1–14:29, March 2018

2018
[127]

Online deep ensemble learning for predicting citywide human mobility

Zipei Fan, Xuan Song, Tianqi Xia, Renhe Jiang, Ryosuke Shibasaki, and Ritsu Sakuramachi. Online deep ensemble learning for predicting citywide human mobility. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 2(3), sep 2018

2018
[128]

Pmf: A privacy-preserving human mobility prediction framework via federated learning

Jie Feng, Can Rong, Funing Sun, Diansheng Guo, and Yong Li. Pmf: A privacy-preserving human mobility prediction framework via federated learning. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 4(1), mar 2020

2020
[129]

Deepmove: Predicting human mobility with attentional recurrent networks

Jie Feng, Yong Li, Chao Zhang, Funing Sun, Fanchao Meng, Ang Guo, and Depeng Jin. Deepmove: Predicting human mobility with attentional recurrent networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, WWW ’18, page 1459–1468, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 2018. I...

2018
[130]

Origin-destination matrix prediction via graph convolution: A new perspective of passenger demand modeling

Yuandong Wang, Hongzhi Yin, Hongxu Chen, Tianyu Wo, Jie Xu, and Kai Zheng. Origin-destination matrix prediction via graph convolution: A new perspective of passenger demand modeling. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data M...

2019
[131]

Predicting origin-destination flow via multi-perspective graph convolutional network

Hongzhi Shi, Quanming Yao, Qi Guo, Yaguang Li, Lingyu Zhang, Jieping Ye, Yong Li, and Yan Liu. Predicting origin-destination flow via multi-perspective graph convolutional network. In 2020 IEEE 36th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 1818–1821, 2020. 26

2020
[132]

Dynamic public resource allocation based on human mobility prediction

Sijie Ruan, Jie Bao, Yuxuan Liang, Ruiyuan Li, Tianfu He, Chuishi Meng, Yanhua Li, Yingcai Wu, and Yu Zheng. Dynamic public resource allocation based on human mobility prediction. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 4(1), mar 2020

2020
[133]

Human-centric urban transit evaluation and planning

Guojun Wu, Yanhua Li, Jie Bao, Yu Zheng, Jieping Ye, and Jun Luo. Human-centric urban transit evaluation and planning. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pages 547–556, 2018

2018
[134]

A hierarchical multi-resolution agent-based modeling and simulation framework for household electricity demand profile

Imran Mahmood, Quair tul ain, Hasan Arshad Nasir, Fahad Javed, and José A Aguado. A hierarchical multi-resolution agent-based modeling and simulation framework for household electricity demand profile. SIMULATION, 96(8):655–678, 2020

2020
[135]

Multi-Agent based simulation of human activity for building and urban scale assessment of residential load curves and energy use

Mathieu Schumann, Quentin Reynaud, Nicolas Sabouret, François Sempé, Yvon Haradji, Benoit Charrier, Jérémy Albouys, and Christian Inard. Multi-Agent based simulation of human activity for building and urban scale assessment of residential load curves and energy use. In Buildin...

2021
[136]

Stan: Synthetic network traffic generation with generative neural models

Shengzhe Xu, Manish Marwah, Martin Arlitt, and Naren Ramakrishnan. Stan: Synthetic network traffic generation with generative neural models. In Gang Wang, Arridhana Ciptadi, and Ali Ahmadzadeh, editors, Deployable Machine Learning for Security Defense, pages 3–29, Cham, 2021. ...

2021
[137]

Flow-based network traffic generation using generative adversarial networks

Markus Ring, Daniel Schlör, Dieter Landes, and Andreas Hotho. Flow-based network traffic generation using generative adversarial networks. Computers & Security, 82:156–172, 2019

2019
[138]

Knowl- edge enhanced gan for iot traffic generation

Shuodi Hui, Huandong Wang, Zhenhua Wang, Xinghao Yang, Zhongjin Liu, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. Knowl- edge enhanced gan for iot traffic generation. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, WWW ’22, page 3336–3346, New York, NY , USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery

2022
[139]

Zubaidi, Sandra Ortega-Martorell, Hussein Al-Bugharbee, Ivan Olier, Khalid S

Salah L. Zubaidi, Sandra Ortega-Martorell, Hussein Al-Bugharbee, Ivan Olier, Khalid S. Hashim, Sadik Kamel Gharghan, Patryk Kot, and Rafid Al-Khaddar. Urban water demand prediction for a city that suffers from climate change and population growth: Gauteng province case study. ...

2020
[140]

Zubaidi, Hussein Al-Bugharbee, Sandra Ortega-Martorell, Sadik Kamel Gharghan, Ivan Olier, Khalid S

Salah L. Zubaidi, Hussein Al-Bugharbee, Sandra Ortega-Martorell, Sadik Kamel Gharghan, Ivan Olier, Khalid S. Hashim, Nabeel Saleem Saad Al-Bdairi, and Patryk Kot. A novel methodology for prediction urban water demand by wavelet denoising and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference syst...

2020
[141]

A hybrid model based on cnn and bi-lstm for urban water demand prediction

Piao Hu, Jun Tong, Jingcheng Wang, Yue Yang, and Luca de Oliveira Turci. A hybrid model based on cnn and bi-lstm for urban water demand prediction. In 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pages 1088–1094, 2019

2019
[142]

Spatiotemporal modeling and prediction in cellular networks: A big data enabled deep learning approach

Jing Wang, Jian Tang, Zhiyuan Xu, Yanzhi Wang, Guoliang Xue, Xing Zhang, and Dejun Yang. Spatiotemporal modeling and prediction in cellular networks: A big data enabled deep learning approach. In IEEE INFOCOM 2017 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, pages 1–9, 2017

2017
[143]

Spatio-temporal analysis and prediction of cellular traffic in metropolis

Xu Wang, Zimu Zhou, Fu Xiao, Kai Xing, Zheng Yang, Yunhao Liu, and Chunyi Peng. Spatio-temporal analysis and prediction of cellular traffic in metropolis. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 18(9):2190–2202, 2019

2019
[144]

Deep transfer learning for intelligent cellular traffic prediction based on cross-domain big data

Chuanting Zhang, Haixia Zhang, Jingping Qiao, Dongfeng Yuan, and Minggao Zhang. Deep transfer learning for intelligent cellular traffic prediction based on cross-domain big data. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 37(6):1389–1401, 2019

2019
[145]

Learning image and user features for recom- mendation in social networks

Xue Geng, Hanwang Zhang, Jingwen Bian, and Tat-Seng Chua. Learning image and user features for recom- mendation in social networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 4274–4282, 2015

2015
[146]

Continuous-time link prediction via temporal dependent graph neural network

Liang Qu, Huaisheng Zhu, Qiqi Duan, and Yuhui Shi. Continuous-time link prediction via temporal dependent graph neural network. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020, pages 3026–3032, 2020

2020
[147]

Evolvegcn: Evolving graph convolutional networks for dynamic graphs

Aldo Pareja, Giacomo Domeniconi, Jie Chen, Tengfei Ma, Toyotaro Suzumura, Hiroki Kanezashi, Tim Kaler, Tao Schardl, and Charles Leiserson. Evolvegcn: Evolving graph convolutional networks for dynamic graphs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol...

2020
[148]

Dysat: Deep neural representation learning on dynamic graphs via self-attention networks

Aravind Sankar, Yanhong Wu, Liang Gou, Wei Zhang, and Hao Yang. Dysat: Deep neural representation learning on dynamic graphs via self-attention networks. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on web search and data mining, pages 519–527, 2020

2020
[149]

Dynamic network embedding by modeling triadic closure process

Lekui Zhou, Yang Yang, Xiang Ren, Fei Wu, and Yueting Zhuang. Dynamic network embedding by modeling triadic closure process. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 32, 2018

2018
[150]

Neural common neighbor with completion for link prediction

Xiyuan Wang, Haotong Yang, and Muhan Zhang. Neural common neighbor with completion for link prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00890, 2023. 27

2023 arXiv
[151]

Collective human behavior in cascading system: discovery, modeling and applications

Yunfei Lu, Linyun Yu, Tianyang Zhang, Chengxi Zang, Peng Cui, Chaoming Song, and Wenwu Zhu. Collective human behavior in cascading system: discovery, modeling and applications. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pages 297–306. IEEE, 2018

2018
[152]

Generating realistic interest-driven information cascades

Federico Cinus, Francesco Bonchi, Corrado Monti, and André Panisson. Generating realistic interest-driven information cascades. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, volume 14, pages 107–118, 2020

2020
[153]

Threshold models of collective behavior

Mark Granovetter. Threshold models of collective behavior. American journal of sociology, 83(6):1420–1443, 1978

1978
[154]

Contagious collectivities: On the spatial diffusion of swedish trade unions, 1890-1940.American journal of sociology, 99(5):1157–1179, 1994

Peter Hedström. Contagious collectivities: On the spatial diffusion of swedish trade unions, 1890-1940.American journal of sociology, 99(5):1157–1179, 1994

1940
[155]

An agent based modeling approach in the strategic human resource management, including endogenous and exogenous factors

Belhaj Rachid, Tkiouat Mohamed, and Mohamed Ali Khouaja. An agent based modeling approach in the strategic human resource management, including endogenous and exogenous factors. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 88:32–47, 2018

2018
[156]

An agent-based approach for modeling and simulation of human resource management as a complex system: Management strategy evaluation

KUS Somarathna. An agent-based approach for modeling and simulation of human resource management as a complex system: Management strategy evaluation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 104:102118, 2020

2020
[157]

Hybrid modeling methodol- ogy for integrating customers’ behaviors into system simulation to improve service operations management

Ying Tian, Ming Zhao, Ming Liu, Yajing Liao, Chong Huang, and Mingyao Hu. Hybrid modeling methodol- ogy for integrating customers’ behaviors into system simulation to improve service operations management. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 115:102445, 2022

2022
[158]

Agent-based dynamic optimization for managing the workflow of the patient’s pathway

Faten Ajmi, Hayfa Zgaya, Sarah Ben Othman, and Slim Hammadi. Agent-based dynamic optimization for managing the workflow of the patient’s pathway. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 96:101935, 2019

2019
[159]

Digital human and robot simulation in automotive assembly using siemens process simulate: a feasibility study

Sidharth Baskaran, Farbod Akhavan Niaki, Mark Tomaszewski, Jasprit Singh Gill, Yi Chen, Yunyi Jia, Laine Mears, and Venkat Krovi. Digital human and robot simulation in automotive assembly using siemens process simulate: a feasibility study. Procedia Manufacturing, 34:986–994, 2019

2019
[160]

The bioeconomic modelling system mpmas_xn: Simulating short and long-term feedback between climate, crop growth, crop management and farm management

C Troost, X Duan, S Gayler, F Heinlein, C Klein, J Aurbacher, MS Demyan, P Högy, M Laub, J Ingwersen, et al. The bioeconomic modelling system mpmas_xn: Simulating short and long-term feedback between climate, crop growth, crop management and farm management. In 10th Internatio...

2020
[161]

Putting data in the driver’s seat: Optimizing earnings for on-demand ride-hailing

Harshal A Chaudhari, John W Byers, and Evimaria Terzi. Putting data in the driver’s seat: Optimizing earnings for on-demand ride-hailing. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 90–98, 2018

2018
[162]

Modeling city logistics using adaptive dynamic programming based multi-agent simulation

Nailah Firdausiyah, E Taniguchi, and AG Qureshi. Modeling city logistics using adaptive dynamic programming based multi-agent simulation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125:74–96, 2019

2019
[163]

A simulation-optimization approach for assessing the impact of a new client on the 3pl’s last-mile delivery performance

Miloš Ruži´c, Dražen Popovi ´c, Milorad Vidovi´c, and Dušan Beši ´c. A simulation-optimization approach for assessing the impact of a new client on the 3pl’s last-mile delivery performance. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering, 11(2), 2021

2021
[164]

Crowdsourced delivery for last-mile distribution: An agent-based modelling and simulation approach

Ping Chen and Stanislav M Chankov. Crowdsourced delivery for last-mile distribution: An agent-based modelling and simulation approach. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), pages 1271–1275. IEEE, 2017

2017
[165]

Virtual-taobao: Virtualizing real-world online retail environment for reinforcement learning

Jing-Cheng Shi, Yang Yu, Qing Da, Shi-Yong Chen, and An-Xiang Zeng. Virtual-taobao: Virtualizing real-world online retail environment for reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 33, pages 4902–4909, 2019

2019
[166]

Mindsim: User simulator for news recommenders

Xufang Luo, Zheng Liu, Shitao Xiao, Xing Xie, and Dongsheng Li. Mindsim: User simulator for news recommenders. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, pages 2067–2077, 2022

2022
[167]

Generative adversarial networks

Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM, 63(11):139–144, 2020

2020
[168]

Usersim: User simulation via supervised generativeadversarial network

Xiangyu Zhao, Long Xia, Lixin Zou, Hui Liu, Dawei Yin, and Jiliang Tang. Usersim: User simulation via supervised generativeadversarial network. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, pages 3582–3589, 2021

2021
[169]

Evaluating conversational recommender systems via user simulation

Shuo Zhang and Krisztian Balog. Evaluating conversational recommender systems via user simulation. In Proceedings of the 26th acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining , pages 1512–1520, 2020

2020
[170]

Evolutionary games and spatial chaos

Martin A Nowak and Robert M May. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature, 359(6398):826–829, 1992. 28

1992
[171]

Know when to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation

C Athena Aktipis. Know when to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation. Journal of theoretical biology, 231(2):249–260, 2004

2004
[172]

Recognition memory and the evolution of cooperation: How simple strategies succeed in an agent-based world

C Athena Aktipis. Recognition memory and the evolution of cooperation: How simple strategies succeed in an agent-based world. Adaptive Behavior, 14(3):239–247, 2006

2006
[173]

Is cooperation viable in mobile organisms? simple walk away rule favors the evolution of cooperation in groups

C Athena Aktipis. Is cooperation viable in mobile organisms? simple walk away rule favors the evolution of cooperation in groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(4):263–276, 2011

2011
[174]

Taxai: A dynamic economic simulator and benchmark for multi-agent reinforcement learning

Qirui Mi, Siyu Xia, Yan Song, Haifeng Zhang, Shenghao Zhu, and Jun Wang. Taxai: A dynamic economic simulator and benchmark for multi-agent reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16307, 2023

2023 arXiv
[175]

The ai economist: Improving equality and productivity with ai-driven tax policies

Stephan Zheng, Alexander Trott, Sunil Srinivasa, Nikhil Naik, Melvin Gruesbeck, David C Parkes, and Richard Socher. The ai economist: Improving equality and productivity with ai-driven tax policies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13332, 2020

2004 arXiv
[176]

Analyzing micro-founded general equilibrium models with many agents using deep reinforcement learning

Michael Curry, Alexander Trott, Soham Phade, Yu Bai, and Stephan Zheng. Analyzing micro-founded general equilibrium models with many agents using deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01163, 2022

2022 arXiv
[177]

State-of-the-art pedestrian and evacuation dynamics

Hairong Dong, Min Zhou, Qianling Wang, Xiaoxia Yang, and Fei-Yue Wang. State-of-the-art pedestrian and evacuation dynamics. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 21(5):1849–1866, 2019

2019
[178]

20 years of mobility modeling & prediction: Trends, shortcomings & perspectives

Vaibhav Kulkarni and Benoît Garbinato. 20 years of mobility modeling & prediction: Trends, shortcomings & perspectives. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pages 492–495, 2019

2019
[179]

Crowd-driven mid-scale layout design

Tian Feng, Lap-Fai Yu, Sai-Kit Yeung, KangKang Yin, and Kun Zhou. Crowd-driven mid-scale layout design. ACM Trans. Graph., 35(4):132–1, 2016

2016
[180]

Bayesian optimization for crowd traffic control using multi-agent simulation

Takuma Otsuka, Hitoshi Shimizu, Tomoharu Iwata, Futoshi Naya, Hiroshi Sawada, and Naonori Ueda. Bayesian optimization for crowd traffic control using multi-agent simulation. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pages 1981–1988. IEEE, 2019

2019
[181]

Crowd simulation for emergency response using bdi agent based on virtual reality

Ameya Shendarkar, Karthik Vasudevan, Seungho Lee, and Young-Jun Son. Crowd simulation for emergency response using bdi agent based on virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2006 winter simulation conference, pages 545–553. IEEE, 2006

2006
[182]

Disseminating synthetic smart home data for advanced applications

Andrea Masciadri, Fabio Veronese, Sara Comai, Ilaria Carlini, and Fabio Salice. Disseminating synthetic smart home data for advanced applications. In CIKM Workshops, 2018

2018
[183]

A boarding model for heterogeneous passengers on the platform of high-speed railway station

Chuan-Yao Li, Rui-Yu Yang, Liang Chen, and Tie-Qiao Tang. A boarding model for heterogeneous passengers on the platform of high-speed railway station. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 106:102188, 2021

2021
[184]

Simulation of pedestrian rotation dynamics near crowded exits

Xiao Song, Hongnan Xie, Jinghan Sun, Daolin Han, Yong Cui, and Bin Chen. Simulation of pedestrian rotation dynamics near crowded exits. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(8):3142–3155, 2019

2019
[185]

Dynamics of crowd disasters: An empirical study

Dirk Helbing, Anders Johansson, and Habib Zein Al-Abideen. Dynamics of crowd disasters: An empirical study. Physical review E, 75(4):046109, 2007

2007
[186]

Crowd simulation by deep reinforcement learning

Jaedong Lee, Jungdam Won, and Jehee Lee. Crowd simulation by deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Motion, Interaction and Games, pages 1–7, 2018

2018
[187]

Heterogeneous crowd simulation using parametric reinforcement learning

Kaidong Hu, Brandon Haworth, Glen Berseth, Vladimir Pavlovic, Petros Faloutsos, and Mubbasir Kapadia. Heterogeneous crowd simulation using parametric reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2021

2021
[188]

A comprehensive comparison study of four classical car-following models based on the large-scale naturalistic driving experiment

Duo Zhang, Xiaoyun Chen, Junhua Wang, Yinhai Wang, and Jian Sun. A comprehensive comparison study of four classical car-following models based on the large-scale naturalistic driving experiment. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 113:102383, 2021

2021
[189]

Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow

Duo Zhang, Xiaoyun Chen, Junhua Wang, Yinhai Wang, and Jian Sun. Nonlinear follow-the-leader models of traffic flow. Operations Research, 9(4):545–567, 1961

1961
[190]

P.G. Gipps. A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 15(2):105–111, 1981

1981
[191]

Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations

Martin Treiber, Ansgar Hennecke, and Dirk Helbing. Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys. Rev. E, 62:1805–1824, Aug 2000

2000
[192]

Wiedemann

R. Wiedemann. Simulation des strassenverkehrsflusses. Transportation Research Board, pages 66–68, 1973

1973
[193]

Capturing car-following behaviors by deep learning

Xiao Wang, Rui Jiang, Li Li, Yilun Lin, Xinhu Zheng, and Fei-Yue Wang. Capturing car-following behaviors by deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(3):910–920, 2018. 29

2018
[194]

Social behavior for autonomous vehicles

Wilko Schwarting, Alyssa Pierson, Javier Alonso-Mora, Sertac Karaman, and Daniela Rus. Social behavior for autonomous vehicles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 116(50):24972–24978, December 2019

2019
[195]

Surrealdriver: Designing generative driver agent simulation framework in urban contexts based on large language model

Ye Jin, Xiaoxi Shen, Huiling Peng, Xiaoan Liu, Jingli Qin, Jiayang Li, Jintao Xie, Peizhong Gao, Guyue Zhou, and Jiangtao Gong. Surrealdriver: Designing generative driver agent simulation framework in urban contexts based on large language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.13193, 2023

2023 arXiv
[196]

Where would i go next? large language models as human mobility predictors

Xinglei Wang, Meng Fang, Zichao Zeng, and Tao Cheng. Where would i go next? large language models as human mobility predictors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15197, 2023

2023 arXiv
[197]

Mirage: an efficient and extensible city simulation framework (systems paper)

Jun Zhang, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. Mirage: an efficient and extensible city simulation framework (systems paper). In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, pages 1–4, 2022

2022
[198]

Quantitative description and simulation of human behavior in residential buildings

Chen Peng, Da Yan, Ruhong Wu, Chuang Wang, Xin Zhou, and Yi Jiang. Quantitative description and simulation of human behavior in residential buildings. Building Simulation, 5:85–94, 2012

2012
[199]

The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration, 1998

Andrew M Colman. The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration, 1998

1998
[200]

Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation

Rainer Hegselmann, Ulrich Krause, et al. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. Journal of artificial societies and social simulation, 5(3), 2002

2002
[201]

Large language models show human-like content biases in transmission chain experiments

Alberto Acerbi and Joseph M Stubbersfield. Large language models show human-like content biases in transmission chain experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(44):e2313790120, 2023

2023
[202]

Learning dynamics in social dilemmas

Michael W Macy and Andreas Flache. Learning dynamics in social dilemmas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(suppl_3):7229–7236, 2002

2002
[203]

Communicative agents for software development

Chen Qian, Xin Cong, Cheng Yang, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Juyuan Xu, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. Communicative agents for software development. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.07924, 2023

2023 arXiv
[204]

Competeai: Understanding the competition behaviors in large language model-based agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17512, 2023

Qinlin Zhao, Jindong Wang, Yixuan Zhang, Yiqiao Jin, Kaijie Zhu, Hao Chen, and Xing Xie. Competeai: Understanding the competition behaviors in large language model-based agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17512, 2023

2023 arXiv
[205]

A survey of graph neural networks for recommender systems: Challenges, methods, and directions

Chen Gao, Yu Zheng, Nian Li, Yinfeng Li, Yingrong Qin, Jinghua Piao, Yuhan Quan, Jianxin Chang, Depeng Jin, Xiangnan He, et al. A survey of graph neural networks for recommender systems: Challenges, methods, and directions. ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems, 2022

2022
[206]

Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives

Shuai Zhang, Lina Yao, Aixin Sun, and Yi Tay. Deep learning based recommender system: A survey and new perspectives. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 52(1):1–38, 2019

2019
[207]

Recagent: A novel simulation paradigm for recommender systems

Lei Wang, Jingsen Zhang, Xu Chen, Yankai Lin, Ruihua Song, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Ji-Rong Wen. Recagent: A novel simulation paradigm for recommender systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02552, 2023

2023 arXiv
[208]

A real-world webagent with planning, long context understanding, and program synthesis

Izzeddin Gur, Hiroki Furuta, Austin Huang, Mustafa Safdari, Yutaka Matsuo, Douglas Eck, and Aleksandra Faust. A real-world webagent with planning, long context understanding, and program synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12856, 2023

2023 arXiv
[209]

Agent-based modeling in economics and finance: past, present, and future

Robert L Axtell and J Doyne Farmer. Agent-based modeling in economics and finance: past, present, and future. Journal of Economic Literature, 2022

2022
[210]

Avoiding global congestion using decentralized adaptive agents

Ann M Bell and William A Sethares. Avoiding global congestion using decentralized adaptive agents. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 49(11):2873–2879, 2001

2001
[211]

Coordination failure as a source of congestion in information networks

Ann M Bell, William A Sethares, and James A Bucklew. Coordination failure as a source of congestion in information networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 51(3):875–885, 2003

2003
[212]

Gpt agents in game theory experiments

Fulin Guo. Gpt agents in game theory experiments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05516, 2023

2023 arXiv
[213]

Large language model-empowered agents for simulating macroeconomic activities

Nian Li, Chen Gao, Yong Li, and Qingmin Liao. Large language model-empowered agents for simulating macroeconomic activities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10436, 2023

2023 arXiv
[214]

Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network

David Kempe, Jon Kleinberg, and Éva Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 137–146. Association for Computing Machinery, August 2003

2003
[215]

Package pick-up route prediction via modeling couriers’ spatial-temporal behaviors

Haomin Wen, Youfang Lin, Fan Wu, Huaiyu Wan, Shengnan Guo, Lixia Wu, Chao Song, and Yinghui Xu. Package pick-up route prediction via modeling couriers’ spatial-temporal behaviors. In 2021 IEEE 37th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 2141–2146, April 2021. 30

2021
[216]

Physics-infused machine learning for crowd simulation

Guozhen Zhang, Zihan Yu, Depeng Jin, and Yong Li. Physics-infused machine learning for crowd simulation. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’22, page 2439–2449, New York, NY , USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery

2022
[217]

Integrating scientific knowledge with machine learning for engineering and environmental systems

Jared Willard, Xiaowei Jia, Shaoming Xu, Michael Steinbach, and Vipin Kumar. Integrating scientific knowledge with machine learning for engineering and environmental systems. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(4):1–37, 2022

2022
[218]

Calibrating a social force based model for simulating personal mobility vehicles and pedestrian mixed traffic

Charitha Dias, Miho Iryo-Asano, Hiroaki Nishiuchi, and Tomoyuki Todoroki. Calibrating a social force based model for simulating personal mobility vehicles and pedestrian mixed traffic. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 87:395–411, September 2018

2018
[219]

A dynamic sensitivity model for unidirectional pedestrian flow with overtaking behaviour and its application on social distancing’s impact during covid-19

Bo Du, Cheng Zhang, Jun Shen, and Zuduo Zheng. A dynamic sensitivity model for unidirectional pedestrian flow with overtaking behaviour and its application on social distancing’s impact during covid-19. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(8):10404–10417...

2022
[220]

Adamic, and Bernardo A

Jure Leskovec, Lada A. Adamic, and Bernardo A. Huberman. The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web, 1(1):5, May 2007

2007
[221]

Reaching a consensus

Morris H DeGroot. Reaching a consensus. Journal of the American Statistical association, 69(345):118–121, 1974

1974
[222]

A formal theory of social power

John RP French Jr. A formal theory of social power. Psychological review, 63(3):181, 1956

1956
[223]

Capturing car-following behaviors by deep learning

Xiao Wang, Rui Jiang, Li Li, Yilun Lin, Xinhu Zheng, and Fei-Yue Wang. Capturing car-following behaviors by deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(3):910–920, March 2018

2018
[224]

Vehicle turning behavior modeling at conflicting areas of mixed-flow intersections based on deep learning

Jian Sun, Xiao Qi, Yiming Xu, and Ye Tian. Vehicle turning behavior modeling at conflicting areas of mixed-flow intersections based on deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(9):3674–3685, 2020

2020
[225]

Trafficsim: Learning to simulate realistic multi-agent behaviors

Simon Suo, Sebastian Regalado, Sergio Casas, and Raquel Urtasun. Trafficsim: Learning to simulate realistic multi-agent behaviors. In 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10395–10404, June 2021

2021
[226]

Origin-destination matrix prediction via graph convolution: A new perspective of passenger demand modeling

Yuandong Wang, Hongzhi Yin, Hongxu Chen, Tianyu Wo, Jie Xu, and Kai Zheng. Origin-destination matrix prediction via graph convolution: A new perspective of passenger demand modeling. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data M...

2019
[227]

Learning to simulate human mobility

Jie Feng, Zeyu Yang, Fengli Xu, Haisu Yu, Mudan Wang, and Yong Li. Learning to simulate human mobility. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pages 3426–3433, Virtual Event CA USA, August 2020. ACM

2020
[228]

Contrasting temporal difference and opportunity cost reinforcement learning in an empirical money-emergence paradigm

Germain Lefebvre, Aurélien Nioche, Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde, and Stefano Palminteri. Contrasting temporal difference and opportunity cost reinforcement learning in an empirical money-emergence paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49), December 2018

2018
[229]

Unveiling taxi drivers’ strategies via cgail: Conditional generative adversarial imitation learning

Xin Zhang, Yanhua Li, Xun Zhou, and Jun Luo. Unveiling taxi drivers’ strategies via cgail: Conditional generative adversarial imitation learning. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) , pages 1480–1485, November 2019

2019
[230]

Massive computational acceleration by using neural networks to emulate mechanism-based biological models

Shangying Wang, Kai Fan, Nan Luo, Yangxiaolu Cao, Feilun Wu, Carolyn Zhang, Katherine A Heller, and Lingchong You. Massive computational acceleration by using neural networks to emulate mechanism-based biological models. Nature communications, 10(1):4354, 2019

2019
[231]

Scaling deep learning for materials discovery

Amil Merchant, Simon Batzner, Samuel S Schoenholz, Muratahan Aykol, Gowoon Cheon, and Ekin Dogus Cubuk. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery. Nature, pages 1–6, 2023

2023
[232]

Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients

Brenden K Petersen, Mikel Landajuela, T Nathan Mundhenk, Claudio P Santiago, Soo K Kim, and Joanne T Kim. Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04871, 2019

1912 arXiv
[233]

Deep learning and symbolic regression for discovering parametric equations

Michael Zhang, Samuel Kim, Peter Y Lu, and Marin Solja ˇci´c. Deep learning and symbolic regression for discovering parametric equations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2023

2023
[234]

Physics- informed machine learning

George Em Karniadakis, Ioannis G Kevrekidis, Lu Lu, Paris Perdikaris, Sifan Wang, and Liu Yang. Physics- informed machine learning. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6):422–440, 2021

2021
[235]

A data-driven neural network approach to simulate pedestrian movement

Xiao Song, Daolin Han, Jinghan Sun, and Zenghui Zhang. A data-driven neural network approach to simulate pedestrian movement. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 509:827–844, 2018

2018
[236]

A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths

Peter E Hart, Nils J Nilsson, and Bertram Raphael. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4(2):100–107, 1968. 31

1968
[237]

Physically informed artificial neural networks for atomistic modeling of materials

GP Purja Pun, R Batra, R Ramprasad, and Y Mishin. Physically informed artificial neural networks for atomistic modeling of materials. Nature communications, 10(1):2339, 2019

2019
[238]

Coupling intent and action for pedestrian crossing behavior prediction

Yu Yao, Ella Atkins, Matthew Johnson-Roberson, Ram Vasudevan, and Xiaoxiao Du. Coupling intent and action for pedestrian crossing behavior prediction. In Zhi-Hua Zhou, editor, Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-21 , pa...

2021
[239]

Learning to simulate self-driven particles system with coordinated policy optimization

Zhenghao Peng, Quanyi Li, Ka Ming Hui, Chunxiao Liu, and Bolei Zhou. Learning to simulate self-driven particles system with coordinated policy optimization. In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y . Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan, editors, Advances in Neural Information ...

2021
[240]

Predicting opinion dynamics via sociologically-informed neural networks

Maya Okawa and Tomoharu Iwata. Predicting opinion dynamics via sociologically-informed neural networks. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 1306–1316, 2022

2022
[241]

The devil is in the detail: A framework for macroscopic prediction via microscopic models

Yingxiang Yang, Negar Kiyavash, Le Song, and Niao He. The devil is in the detail: A framework for macroscopic prediction via microscopic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:8006–8016, 2020

2020
[242]

Multiscale simulations of complex systems by learning their effective dynamics

Pantelis R Vlachas, Georgios Arampatzis, Caroline Uhler, and Petros Koumoutsakos. Multiscale simulations of complex systems by learning their effective dynamics. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(4):359–366, 2022. 32

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Introduction to simulation

Jerry Banks. Introduction to simulation. In Proceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation— a bridge to the future-Volume 1, pages 7–13, 1999

1999

[2] [2]

A guide to simulation

Paul Bratley, Bennet L Fox, and Linus E Schrage. A guide to simulation. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

2011

[3] [3]

Molecular dynamics simulation for all

Scott A Hollingsworth and Ron O Dror. Molecular dynamics simulation for all. Neuron, 99(6):1129–1143, 2018

2018

[4] [4]

Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics

William L Oberkampf and Timothy G Trucano. Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Progress in aerospace sciences, 38(3):209–272, 2002

2002

[5] [5]

Multi-scale modelling and simulation in systems biology

Joseph O Dada and Pedro Mendes. Multi-scale modelling and simulation in systems biology. Integrative Biology, 3(2):86–96, 2011

2011

[6] [6]

Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology

Ron O Dror, Robert M Dirks, JP Grossman, Huafeng Xu, and David E Shaw. Biomolecular simulation: a computational microscope for molecular biology. Annu. rev. biophys, 41(1):429–452, 2012. 20

2012

[7] [7]

A review of physics simulators for robotic applications

Jack Collins, Shelvin Chand, Anthony Vanderkop, and David Howard. A review of physics simulators for robotic applications. IEEE Access, 9:51416–51431, 2021

2021

[8] [8]

The benefits of global high resolution for climate simulation: process understanding and the enabling of stakeholder decisions at the regional scale

MJ Roberts, PL Vidale, C Senior, HT Hewitt, C Bates, S Berthou, P Chang, HM Christensen, S Danilov, M-E Demory, et al. The benefits of global high resolution for climate simulation: process understanding and the enabling of stakeholder decisions at the regional scale. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 99(11):2341–2359, 2018

2018