Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 42 references

Aging and sub-aging for Bouchaud trap models on resistance metric spaces

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that Bouchaud trap models age and sub-age on any sequence of electrical networks that converges as resistance metric spaces and satisfies a non-explosion condition.

desk verdict A genuinely new aging result for Bouchaud trap models on recurrent resistance metric spaces, internally consistent and likely correct; the main caveat is heavy reliance on three unpublished preprints by the same author. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08236 v1 pith:62J2KUEM submitted 2024-12-11 math.PR

Ryoichiro Noda This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60K3760J2760F1760J35
keywords Bouchaudtrapmodelagingsub-agingresistancemetricspaceselectricalnetworksGromov-Hausdorff-vaguetopologySierpinskigasketcriticalrandomgraphs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the Bouchaud trap model—a Markov chain on a weighted graph whose holding times at vertices are independent heavy-tailed traps—ages and sub-ages on any sequence of electrical networks that converges in the local Gromov-Hausdorff-vague topology and satisfies a non-explosion condition. The result converts the aging problem for trap models on fractal-like or random low-dimensional graphs into a statement about effective resistances. Aging means the probability that the chain is at the same vertex at two widely separated times has a nonzero limit depending only on the ratio of the times; sub-aging is the same statement on a shorter waiting-time window. The theorem covers the Sierpi\'nski gasket, critical Galton-Watson trees, and the critical Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi random graph, and it upgrades an earlier convergence result by replacing a uniform volume-doubling assumption with the weaker non-explosion condition.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the vague-and-point-process topology on the space of discrete Radon measures: it keeps track not only of where traps sit and their total mass, but also of the individual atoms, so that the heavy-tailed trap environment converges as a marked point process. The paper proves this topology is Polish, which lets the Skorohod representation theorem produce an almost-sure coupling of the traps. On the resistance side, the key estimates are the Chapman-Kolmogorov and Cauchy-Schwarz bounds on the transition densities of the Hunt process associated with a resistance form; Proposition 4.13 shows that, along a Gromov-Hausdorff-vague convergent sequence, the transition densities are uniformly bounded and equicontinuous. This precompactness, together with trace estimates for exit times from balls, upgrades convergence of traps and processes to convergence of the (sub-)aging functions.

What would settle it

One concrete check: for the standard Sierpi\'nski gasket graph sequence, evaluate the annealed two-point function at times $s(5/3)^n 3^{n/\alpha}$ and $t(5/3)^n 3^{n/\alpha}$; the theorem says it converges to $\mathbb{E}[\Phi^{\nu}(s,t)]$ for the Poisson-trap speed measure on the gasket. A different limit, non-convergence, or a limit that the transition-density precompactness argument cannot produce would settle whether the stated assumptions are sufficient.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that, under Assumption 1.5, the entire scaled BTM package converges: the ambient resistance metric spaces with their counting measures, the law of the scaled trap measure in the vague-and-point-process topology, the law of the scaled process started at the root, and the two-point aging function. The limit is described by a random speed measure built from a Poisson point process with intensity $\mu(dx)\alpha v^{-1-\alpha}dv$ on the limiting resistance space; this is the analogue of the one-dimensional trap-model speed measure. In particular the annealed aging functions converge, $\mathbb{E}_n[\tilde{\Phi}_n^{\nu_n}(s,t)] \to \mathbb{E}[\Phi^{\nu}(s,t)]$. With the extra assumption that the marked counting measures $\dot{\mu}^\#_n$—one-point local data such as total conductance or degree—converge, the same convergence holds for the sub-aging functions $\tilde{\Psi}_n^{\nu_n}$. The proof reduces aging to deterministic trap convergence: once traps converge in the vague-and-point-process topology, transition-density precompactness and pointwise evaluation give the aging limit.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the non-explosion condition: as the radius $r$ grows, the scaled effective resistance from the root to the complement of the ball of radius $a_n r$ must tend to infinity, uniformly in $n$; if this fails, the proof gives no uniform control on exit times or transition densities, and the aging conclusion is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On the Sierpi\'nski gasket graph sequence, the BTM ages at time scale $(5/3)^n 3^{n/\alpha}$, with the limit described by the trap process on the gasket.
  • On the critical Galton-Watson tree with $n$ vertices, the BTM ages at scale $n^{1/2} n^{1/\alpha}$, and the annealed two-point functions converge to the continuum random tree limit.
  • On the largest component of the critical Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi graph, the BTM ages at scale $n^{1/3} n^{2/(3\alpha)}$, with limit space a fused tilted Brownian continuum random tree.
  • Under the degree-marked convergence assumption, the sub-aging functions converge too; the limit is expressed through the joint distribution of location and total conductance, so local graph structure is visible in the sub-aging limit.
  • For random conductance models on $\mathbb{Z}$, aging homogenizes away the random conductances, while sub-aging retains their effect through the total-conductance distribution at vertices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The non-explosion condition is likely close to optimal: any convergent sequence of recurrent networks where it fails should be a natural source of counterexamples to universal aging, since the proof's control of exit times and transition-density precompactness breaks exactly there.
  • The Polish metrization constructed for traps should transfer to other random-speed processes whose jump rates depend on finite local data, as the paper's Remark 1.11 hints for generalized trap models; a concrete next step would be to verify the analogous marked-measure convergence for such models.
  • Because the sub-aging limit depends on the marked measure $\dot{\mu}^{\#}$ and not just on the base space, sub-aging offers a quantitative probe of local geometry; comparing finite-graph simulations to the stated Poisson limits on the gasket or Galton-Watson trees would be a direct numerical check.
  • The paper's Remark 1.18 suggests the arguments extend to non-symmetric BTMs once the associated random resistance metrics are shown to converge; verifying that condition for a natural heavy-tailed conductance model would test the scope of the approach.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves convergence and aging results for symmetric Bouchaud trap models on sequences of electrical networks that converge in the local Gromov-Hausdorff-vague topology and satisfy a uniform non-explosion condition. The main theorems (1.6 and 1.9, with random counterparts 1.13 and 1.16) identify the scaling limits of the traps, the time-scaled BTM processes, and the corresponding aging and sub-aging functions. The proofs are organized around two new technical ingredients: a Polish metrization of the vague-and-point-process topology on discrete measures (Section 2) and a precompactness result for transition densities of processes on resistance metric spaces (Proposition 4.13). The results are then specialized to the Sierpinski gasket, the one-dimensional random conductance model, critical Galton-Watson trees, and the critical Erdos-Renyi random graph.

Significance. If the results are correct, they significantly extend the scope of aging theorems for trap models, replacing the uniform volume-doubling condition of Croydon-Hambly-Kumagai with the weaker non-explosion condition and adding sub-aging limits. The limit objects are explicit: the traps converge to a Poissonian random measure on the limiting resistance space, and the aging functions are described by the associated diffusion. The paper contains original, reusable machinery, notably the Polish metrization and tightness criteria for the vague-and-point-process topology (Theorems 2.21, 2.22, 2.26) and the deterministic convergence theorems in Section 5. The applications to critical Galton-Watson trees and critical random graphs give new aging and sub-aging limits for natural low-dimensional random graphs. No fitting parameters appear, and the limits are derived from the model rather than imposed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 1-6, general] The central proof chain depends at several load-bearing points on the author's unpublished preprints [37], [38], and [39]. Examples include: the vague-metric results underpinning Section 2 (Theorem 2.2 and Proposition 2.3 from [38]); the complete functor metrization framework of Section 3, including Theorems 3.10, 3.13, 3.17, and 3.21 from [38]; the regularity and recurrence facts for resistance forms used after Assumption 1.5 and in Section 4, including [39, Corollary 3.22] and [39, Theorem 5.1]; and the measurability claim in the proof of Lemma 6.10, which cites [37, Lemma 6.3]. Because these are not yet refereed and are not reproduced in the manuscript, the validity of Theorems 1.6, 1.9, 1.13, and 1.16 cannot be independently assessed from the present submission. Please either include statements (or proofs) of these imported results in an appendix, or otherwise make the paper self-contained for every claim that is used in the main convergence chain.
  2. [Section 7.2] The random conductance model application is not fully supported. After citing [39, Theorem A.2] for the resistance-metric convergence, the paper asserts, without proof, that the marked-measure convergence (V_{G_n}, 2^{-n}R_{G_n}, \rho_{G_n}, 2^{-n}\dot{\mu}^#_{G_n}) \to (\mathbb{R}, d_{\mathbb{R}}, 0, \mathrm{Leb} \otimes P(\zeta_0+\zeta_1\in\cdot)) holds. This is precisely Assumption 1.8 and is load-bearing for the advertised sub-aging result. Please supply a proof or a precise reference. In addition, the last display in this subsection cites Theorem 1.9 where Theorem 1.16 is meant.
  3. [Section 5.1.1, Lemma 5.2] Equation (5.1) is stated as a consequence of weak convergence, but the estimate is uniform in n and in the limit r\to\infty. Please expand the proof: either explain how the uniformity follows from the Skorohod convergence together with recurrence of the limit (control of the finitely many small n), or state the non-explosion condition as an explicit hypothesis in Assumption 5.1. As written, this lemma is the entry point for the equicontinuity arguments in Lemmas 5.3 and 5.4, so the missing justification is load-bearing for Theorem 5.7.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 7.3] The sentence that begins "To apply the sub-aging result (Theorem 1.13)" should refer to Theorem 1.16, not Theorem 1.13.
  2. [Section 7.4, proof of Theorem 7.6] The proof skips the normalization bookkeeping: it first obtains convergence with m_n^{-1}\dot{\mu}^#_{\tilde T} to \sigma^{-1}\mu_{2\tilde e(\sigma)}\otimes\tilde p, and then converts this to the n^{-2/3} scaling in Theorem 7.6. Please spell out the factor \sigma when applying Theorem A.13, so the reader can verify that the limit measure is \mu_{M^{(Z_1)}}\otimes\tilde p and not a scalar multiple of it.
  3. [Lemma 6.5] In the proof of Lemma 6.5, the notation in the condition "\mu(\partial(A\times(u_1,\infty)))=0" should be \dot{\mu}, since the measure at that point is the marked measure on F\times\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}.
  4. [Section 7.4, before Theorem 7.6] The text says that Theorem 7.6 shows Assumption 1.15 holds, but Assumption 1.15 also includes the non-explosion condition (Assumption 1.12(ii)). Please add a sentence explaining why the compactness of the limiting fused space implies the required non-explosion condition for the sequence of largest components.
  5. [Section 1, Theorems 1.6 and 1.9] The spaces in which the convergences in Theorems 1.6 and 1.9 take place are written out in full and are very hard to parse. Introducing short names for the functors and associated metric spaces in Section 1, or collecting them in a table after Section 3, would materially improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the aging/sub-aging limits are computed from the model via trap convergence and the external process-convergence theorem; same-author preprints are used as tools, not as re-labeled inputs.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. Theorem 1.6 is assembled from three independent building blocks: Lemma 6.3 proves convergence of the scaled traps c_n^{-1}ν_n to the Poisson-based F.I.N.-type measure ν using regular variation (Lemma 6.2) and Kallenberg's Poisson convergence criterion; Theorem 5.7 upgrades joint convergence of traps and processes to convergence of the aging functions using only precompactness of transition densities (Proposition 4.13) and vague-and-point-process convergence; and the process-level convergence is imported from Croydon's theorem [21, Theorem 1.2], which is external to this paper. The limit Φ^ν(s,t)=P^ν_ρ(X^ν(s)=X^ν(t)) is the two-point function of the process on the limiting resistance space, not an ansatz or a fitted quantity. Similarly, the sub-aging function Ψ^ν is defined from the joint limit of marked measures and the limiting process, and its convergence in Theorem 5.11 is again proved by truncation and precompactness, with no input re-used as a conclusion. The dependence on the same-author preprints [37], [38], and [39] supplies the Polish metrization framework and resistance-form facts; these are invoked as stated theorems with explicit assumptions, and I found no place where the paper's aging conclusion is used to establish those facts. Non-explosion Assumption 1.5(ii) is a genuine hypothesis, not an outcome, and the proofs verify it uniformly before applying [21, Theorem 1.2]. The sketched verifications in Section 7 (e.g., [39, Theorem A.2] for the random conductance model) are external-input risks, not circularity: they do not make the aging limits equal to the assumptions by construction. Hence the derivation is self-contained in the relevant circularity sense, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the stated convergence and non-explosion assumptions, the standard BTM heavy-tail input, and external theorems in resistance-form theory, several of which are the author's own preprints. No free parameters are fitted and no new physical entities are introduced; the limit objects, such as the Poisson random measures and the F.I.N.-type measure, are mathematical constructions determined by the model.

assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.5(i): (V_n, a_n^{-1} R_n, \rho_n, b_n^{-1} \mu^\#_n) \to (F,R,\rho,\mu) in the local Gromov-Hausdorff-vague topology, with \mu of full support and non-atomic.
    This is the core convergence hypothesis for the aging theorem; the whole proof of trap convergence and process convergence starts from it.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.5(ii): lim_{r\to\infty} liminf_{n\to\infty} a_n^{-1} R_n(\rho_n, B_{R_n}(\rho_n, a_n r)^c) = \infty.
    This non-explosion and recurrence condition is used in Lemma 5.2 to bound exit probabilities and in Proposition 4.13 to obtain precompact transition densities.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.8 and 1.15: (V_n, a_n^{-1}R_n, \rho_n, b_n^{-1} \dot{\mu}^\#_n) \to (F,R,\rho,\dot{\mu}) with \mu(A)=\dot{\mu}(A \times R_{\ge 0}) full support and non-atomic.
    This extra local-structure convergence is needed for the sub-aging theorem, since waiting times at vertices depend on total conductances.
  • domain assumption Trap tail: P_\xi(\xi \ge u) = u^{-\alpha} \ell(u) for \alpha\in(0,1) and \ell slowly varying.
    Standard BTM input; Lemma 6.2 converts it into the Poisson limit of traps with intensity \alpha v^{-1-\alpha} dv.
  • standard math External scaling limit result [21, Theorem 1.2]: convergence of resistance metric spaces implies convergence of associated processes.
    Used in Lemma 4.10 and in the proofs of Theorems 1.6 and 1.16 to pass from network convergence to process convergence.
  • standard math Metrization framework of [38, Theorems 3.13, 3.17, 3.36] for Gromov-Hausdorff-type topologies.
    This is the author's own preprint; the paper's product and probability functors and Polishness arguments depend on it.
  • standard math Kigami resistance-form theorems: a regular resistance form yields a Hunt process with a jointly continuous transition density ([32, Theorems 9.4 and 10.4]).
    Defines the process X^\nu on the limit space and supplies the density estimates used in Proposition 4.13.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Aging and sub-aging for Bouchaud trap models on resistance metric spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/62J2KUEM

@misc{pith2026241208236,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Aging and sub-aging for Bouchaud trap models on resistance metric spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/62J2KUEM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08236}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we prove that if a sequence of electrical networks converges in the local Gromov-Hausdorff topology and satisfies a non-explosion condition, then the associated Bouchaud trap models (BTMs) also converge and exhibit aging. Moreover, when local structures of electrical networks converge, we prove sub-aging. Our results are applicable to a wide class of low-dimensional graphs, including the two-dimensional Sierpi\'{n}ski gasket, critical Galton-Watson trees, and the critical Erd\H{o}s-R\'{e}nyi random graph. The proof consists of two main steps: Polish metrization of the vague-and-point-process topology and showing the precompactness of transition densities of BTMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [37]

    Noda, Convergence of local times of stochastic processes associated with resistance forms, Preprint

    R. Noda, Convergence of local times of stochastic processes associated with resistance forms, Preprint. Available at arXiv:2305.13224

    arXiv

  2. [38]

    Available at arXiv:2404.19681

    , Metrization of Gromov-Hausdorff-type topologies on bounde dly-compact metric spaces , Preprint. Available at arXiv:2404.19681

    arXiv

  3. [39]

    Available at arXiv:2405.01871

    , Scaling limits of discrete-time Markov chains and their loc al times on electrical networks , 2024, Preprint. Available at arXiv:2405.01871

    arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    Abraham, J.-F

    R. Abraham, J.-F. Delmas, and P. Hoscheit, A note on the Gromov-Hausdorff-Prokhorov distance between (locally) compact metric measure spaces , Electron. J. Probab. 18 (2013), no. 14, 21. MR 3035742

    work page 2013

  5. [2]

    Addario-Berry, N

    L. Addario-Berry, N. Broutin, and C. Goldschmidt, The continuum limit of critical random graphs , Probab. Theory Related Fields 152 (2012), no. 3-4, 367–406. MR 2892951

    work page 2012

  6. [3]

    Aldous, The continuum random tree

    D. Aldous, The continuum random tree. III , Ann. Probab. 21 (1993), no. 1, 248–289. MR 1207226

    work page 1993

  7. [4]

    , Brownian excursions, critical random graphs and the multip licative coalescent, Ann. Probab. 25 (1997), no. 2, 812–854. MR 1434128

    work page 1997

  8. [5]

    Athreya, W

    S. Athreya, W. L¨ ohr, and A. Winter, The gap between Gromov-vague and Gromov-Hausdorff-vague topology, Stochastic Process. Appl. 126 (2016), no. 9, 2527–2553. MR 3522292

    work page 2016

Show all 42 references
  1. [6]

    M. T. Barlow, Diffusions on fractals , Lectures on probability theory and statistics (Saint-Flour, 1995), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1690, Springer, Berlin, 1998, p p. 1–121. MR 1668115

    1995

  2. [7]

    Ben Arous, Aging and spin-glass dynamics , Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathe- maticians, Vol

    G. Ben Arous, Aging and spin-glass dynamics , Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathe- maticians, Vol. III (Beijing, 2002), Higher Ed. Press, Beijing, 2002 , pp. 3–14. MR 1957514

    2002

  3. [8]

    Ben Arous, M

    G. Ben Arous, M. Cabezas, J. ˇCern´ y, and R. Royfman, Randomly trapped random walks , Ann. Probab. 43 (2015), no. 5, 2405–2457. MR 3395465

    2015

  4. [9]

    Ben Arous and J

    G. Ben Arous and J. ˇCern´ y,Bouchaud’s model exhibits two different aging regimes in dim ension one, Ann. Appl. Probab. 15 (2005), no. 2, 1161–1192. MR 2134101

    2005

  5. [10]

    V., Amsterdam, 2006, pp

    , Dynamics of trap models , Mathematical statistical physics, Elsevier B. V., Amsterdam, 2006, pp. 331–394. MR 2581889

    2006

  6. [11]

    Ben Arous and J

    G. Ben Arous and J. ˇCern´ y,Scaling limit for trap models on Zd, Ann. Probab. 35 (2007), no. 6, 2356–2384. MR 2353391

    2007

  7. [12]

    Ben Arous and J

    G. Ben Arous and J. ˇCern´ y,The arcsine law as a universal aging scheme for trap models , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 61 (2008), no. 3, 289–329. MR 2376843

    2008

  8. [13]

    Ben Arous, J

    G. Ben Arous, J. ˇCern´ y, and T. Mountford, Aging in two-dimensional Bouchaud’s model , Probab. Theory Related Fields 134 (2006), no. 1, 1–43. MR 2221784

    2006

  9. [14]

    P. Billingsley, Convergence of probability measures , second ed., Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics: Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Yo rk, 1999, A Wiley-Interscience Publication. MR 1700749

    1999

  10. [15]

    N. H. Bingham, C. M. Goldie, and J. L. Teugels, Regular variation, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 27, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , 1987. MR 898871

    1987

  11. [16]

    Bouchaud, Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems , J

    J.-P. Bouchaud, Weak ergodicity breaking and aging in disordered systems , J. Phys. I France 2 (1992), no. 9, 1705–1713

    1992

  12. [17]

    Bouchaud, L

    J.-P. Bouchaud, L. F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and M. M´ ezard , Out of equilibrium dynamics in spin-glasses and other glassy systems , Series on Directions in Condensed Matther Physics, vol. 12, pp. 161–223, 1997

    1997

  13. [18]

    Burago, Y

    D. Burago, Y. Burago, and S. Ivanov, A course in metric geometry , Graduate Studies in Mathemat- ics, vol. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001 . MR 1835418

    2001

  14. [19]

    Cao, Convergence of energy forms on Sierpinski gaskets with adde d rotated triangle , Potential Anal

    S. Cao, Convergence of energy forms on Sierpinski gaskets with adde d rotated triangle , Potential Anal. 59 (2023), no. 4, 1793–1825. MR 4684376

    2023

  15. [20]

    Chen and M

    Z.-Q. Chen and M. Fukushima, Symmetric Markov processes, time change, and boundary theo ry, London Mathematical Society Monographs Series, vol. 35, Princet on University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012. MR 2849840 56 Aging and sub-aging for Bouchaud trap models

    2012

  16. [21]

    D. A. Croydon, Scaling limits of stochastic processes associated with res istance forms , Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat.54 (2018), no. 4, 1939–1968. MR 3865663

    2018

  17. [22]

    D. A. Croydon, B. M. Hambly, and T. Kumagai, Time-changes of stochastic processes associated with resistance forms , Electron. J. Probab. 22 (2017), no. 82, 41. MR 3718710

    2017

  18. [23]

    Croydon, D

    D.A. Croydon, D. Kious, and C. Scali, Aging and sub-aging for one-dimensional random walks amongst random conductances , 2024, Preprint. Available at arXiv:2308.02230

    2024 arXiv

  19. [24]

    Duquesne, A limit theorem for the contour process of conditioned Galto n-Watson trees , Ann

    T. Duquesne, A limit theorem for the contour process of conditioned Galto n-Watson trees , Ann. Probab. 31 (2003), no. 2, 996–1027. MR 1964956

    2003

  20. [25]

    L. R. G. Fontes, M. Isopi, and C. M. Newman, Random walks with strongly inhomogeneous rates and singular diffusions: convergence, localization and aging i n one dimension , Ann. Probab. 30 (2002), no. 2, 579–604. MR 1905852

    2002

  21. [26]

    Fukushima, Y

    M. Fukushima, Y. Oshima, and M. Takeda, Dirichlet forms and symmetric Markov processes , ex- tended ed., De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, vol. 19, Walter de Gr uyter & Co., Berlin, 2011. MR 2778606

    2011

  22. [27]

    Janson, Simply generated trees, conditioned Galton-Watson trees, random allocations and conden- sation, Probab

    S. Janson, Simply generated trees, conditioned Galton-Watson trees, random allocations and conden- sation, Probab. Surv. 9 (2012), 103–252. MR 2908619

    2012

  23. [28]

    Kallenberg, Random measures, theory and applications , Probability Theory and Stochastic Mod- elling, vol

    O. Kallenberg, Random measures, theory and applications , Probability Theory and Stochastic Mod- elling, vol. 77, Springer, Cham, 2017. MR 3642325

    2017

  24. [29]

    99, Springer, Cham, [2021] ©2021

    , Foundations of modern probability , third ed., Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling, vol. 99, Springer, Cham, [2021] ©2021. MR 4226142

    2021

  25. [30]

    Khezeli, A unified framework for generalizing the Gromov-Hausdorff me tric, Probab

    A. Khezeli, A unified framework for generalizing the Gromov-Hausdorff me tric, Probab. Surv. 20 (2023), 837–896. MR 4671147

    2023

  26. [31]

    Kigami, Analysis on fractals , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol

    J. Kigami, Analysis on fractals , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 143, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001. MR 1840042

    2001

  27. [32]

    , Resistance forms, quasisymmetric maps and heat kernel esti mates, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 216 (2012), no. 1015, vi+132. MR 2919892

    2012

  28. [33]

    Le Gall, Random real trees , Ann

    J.-F. Le Gall, Random real trees , Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 15 (2006), no. 1, 35–62. MR 2225746

    2006

  29. [34]

    Coupling from the past

    D. A. Levin and Y. Peres, Markov chains and mixing times , second ed., American Mathematical Soci- ety, Providence, RI, 2017, With contributions by Elizabeth L. Wilmer , With a chapter on “Coupling from the past” by James G. Propp and David B. Wilson. MR 3726904

    2017

  30. [35]

    M. B. Marcus and J. Rosen, Markov processes, Gaussian processes, and local times , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 100, Cambridge University Pr ess, Cambridge, 2006. MR 2250510

    2006

  31. [36]

    Mathieu and J.-C

    P. Mathieu and J.-C. Mourrat, Aging of asymmetric dynamics on the random energy model , Probab. Theory Related Fields 161 (2015), no. 1-2, 351–427. MR 3304755

    2015

  32. [40]

    Th´ evenin, Vertices with fixed outdegrees in large Galton-Watson trees , Electron

    P. Th´ evenin, Vertices with fixed outdegrees in large Galton-Watson trees , Electron. J. Probab. 25 (2020), Paper No. 64, 25. MR 4115733

    2020

  33. [41]

    Whitt, Some useful functions for functional limit theorems , Math

    W. Whitt, Some useful functions for functional limit theorems , Math. Oper. Res. 5 (1980), no. 1, 67–85. MR 561155 57 R. Noda

    1980

  34. [42]

    MR 1876437 58

    , Stochastic-process limits, Springer Series in Operations Research, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002, An introduction to stochastic-process limits and their application to queues. MR 1876437 58

    2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.