Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 139 references

A first measurement of galaxy merger rate increasing in dynamically colder protoclusters at cosmic noon

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Galaxy pairs, a tracer of mergers, are more common in protoclusters with lower velocity dispersion at z~2-3, and the spread in member galaxy sizes is correspondingly larger.

desk verdict Plausible but not yet robust: useful pilot sample whose headline anti-correlation is likely inflated by an untested velocity-window selection effect. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08336 v1 pith:GYREBFAV submitted 2024-12-11 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

Shuang Liu , Xian Zhong Zheng , Valentino Gonzalez , Xiaohu Yang , Jia-Sheng Huang , Dong Dong Shi , Haiguang Xu , Qirong Yuan
show 5 more authors
Yuheng Zhang Run Wen Man Qiao Chao Yang Zongfei Lyu
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords galaxies:clusters:generalhigh-redshiftevolutioninteractionsstatisticsprotoclustersgalaxymergerssizes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper assembles ten spectroscopically confirmed protoclusters at redshift $z\sim2$-$3$ and asks whether the internal motions of a forming cluster shape the galaxies inside it. It reports that the galaxy close-pair fraction, a tracer of merger rate, falls as the protocluster's velocity dispersion rises, and that the scatter in member galaxy half-light radii falls with it. In plain terms, galaxies in dynamically colder protoclusters merge more often, and the resulting mergers leave a larger spread in galaxy sizes. If correct, the dynamical state of a protocluster is a controlling variable for galaxy structure at cosmic noon, and it may reconcile prior conflicting claims about whether protocluster galaxies are larger, smaller, or the same size as field galaxies.

What carries the argument

The central measurement is the line-of-sight velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm los}$ of each protocluster, obtained by fitting a Gaussian to the spectroscopic redshift distribution of its members; it is the dynamical-state indicator plotted on the x-axis of every correlation. The pair fraction counts massive galaxies ($\log(M_*/M_\odot) \ge 10.3$) with a companion at projected separation 5-30 kpc, stellar mass ratio above 0.25, and relative line-of-sight velocity below 500 km/s, corrected for chance projections; a simulation-based merging timescale converts the pair fraction into a merger rate. Size scatter is the standard deviation of half-light radii around the field stellar mass-size relation, measured from two-dimensional S\'ersic fits to HST imaging.

What would settle it

Feed simulated protoclusters with known intrinsic merger rates and the same range of $\sigma_{\rm los}$ through the exact close-pair selection, including the 500 km/s velocity cut; if the cut alone reproduces the observed drop in pair fraction while the intrinsic merger rate is held constant, the headline anti-correlation is a selection artifact, and if it does not, the relation is physical.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims a first measurement of a systematic link between protocluster dynamics and galaxy merging: among ten protoclusters at $z\sim2$-$3$, both the close-pair fraction and the inferred merger rate anti-correlate with the line-of-sight velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm los}$, with Spearman and Pearson coefficients of about $-0.53$ and $-0.56$ for the pair fraction after excluding one system observed in rest-frame UV. The scatter in member galaxy half-light radii around the field size-mass relation shows the same anti-correlation, with coefficients of about $-0.57$ and $-0.67$, and this size scatter tracks the pair fraction positively. The authors interpret cold, high-density protoclusters as environments where encounters are slow and frequent enough to drive mergers, producing both compacted and expanded galaxies and hence a large size dispersion.

Load-bearing premise

A pair is counted only when the two galaxies differ in line-of-sight velocity by less than 500 km/s, so in protoclusters with high velocity dispersion the counting rule itself may discard real merging pairs, which could produce the anti-correlation even if the true merger rate is the same everywhere.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Protocluster dynamical state must be included in predictions and interpretations of galaxy merger rates at $z\sim2$-$3$, alongside overdensity.
  • The size scatter of protocluster galaxies encodes information about merger history, so environment-split size measurements that ignore dynamical state will mix very different evolutionary paths.
  • The correlated decline of merger rate and size scatter with $\sigma_{\rm los}$ offers a single explanation for previously conflicting merger-rate measurements in protoclusters and mature clusters.
  • As protoclusters virialize and $\sigma_{\rm los}$ grows, the measured relations imply that merger-driven growth and structural transformation are concentrated in the cold, early phase of cluster assembly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the relation is causal, a testable consequence is that the fraction of morphologically disturbed galaxies should be elevated in the same cold, low-$\sigma_{\rm los}$ protoclusters, which deeper rest-frame optical imaging could verify.
  • The pair-selection cut at 500 km/s is coupled to the x-axis of the headline relation; if future work applies a completeness correction, the slope of the anti-correlation is expected to change, and the relation may flatten or steepen accordingly.
  • Because the sample mixes rest-frame UV and optical imaging and multiple survey fields, a homogeneous sample selected from one survey with uniform depth and selection would test whether the relation is universal or partly a selection artifact.
  • If the mergers drive both compaction and expansion, cold protoclusters should also show a wider distribution of S\'ersic indices, not just half-light radii, at fixed stellar mass.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper compiles a pilot sample of ten spectroscopically confirmed protoclusters at z~2-3 with HST imaging, estimates their line-of-sight velocity dispersions, galaxy close-pair fractions (and derived merger rates), and the scatter in galaxy half-light radii at fixed stellar mass. It reports a Spearman anti-correlation between velocity dispersion and pair fraction (r_sp=-0.53, after excluding PKS1138-2.160) and between velocity dispersion and size scatter (r_sp=-0.57), interpreting these as evidence that dynamically colder protoclusters host more frequent galaxy mergers and consequently a larger dispersion in galaxy sizes. The paper argues this can reconcile previously contradictory results on cluster galaxy properties and provides a link between large-scale structure assembly and galaxy evolution.

Significance. If the claimed anti-correlation is robust, it would be a new and observationally valuable constraint connecting the dynamical state of protoclusters to galaxy merger rates and structural evolution at cosmic noon. The paper's strength is its compilation of a diverse sample of protoclusters from public spectroscopic catalogs and HST imaging, and its attempt to place pair fractions and size scatters on a common dynamical axis. However, the central claim rests on a small number of independent structures (N=9 after one exclusion), on correlation coefficients reported without p-values or confidence intervals, and on a close-pair velocity window that is coupled to the x-axis of the headline correlation. These issues must be addressed before the 'clear anti-correlation' stated in the abstract can be considered established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, criterion (3)] The fixed line-of-sight velocity window delta_v < 500 km/s used to identify close pairs is applied to the same systems whose velocity dispersion sigma_los is the x-axis of Figs. 2 and 3. For a Gaussian line-of-sight velocity distribution with independent member velocities, the probability that two random members pass this window is P = erf(500/(2 sigma_los)) with sigma_los in km/s; this drops from about 0.92 at sigma_los=200 km/s to about 0.52 at 500 km/s and about 0.34 at 800 km/s. Even if the true pairwise velocity distribution is not exactly this simple model, the pass fraction is expected to decrease with increasing sigma_los. The false-pair subtraction described later in Section 3.3 corrects for foreground/background contamination, but it does not correct this sigma_los-dependent incompleteness of real physical pairs. The paper presents no sensitivity test with a wider velocity window, nor any forward-model correction for the selection. Because this effect has the same sign as the claimed anti-correlation, it is load-bearing and must be quantified before the central claim can be accepted.
  2. [Section 3.3, Figs. 2-3] The headline correlation coefficients r_sp=-0.53 and r_p=-0.56 are quoted without p-values or confidence intervals, and they are obtained after excluding PKS1138-2.160. With N=9 independent points, |r_sp|=0.53 is below the 95% two-sided Spearman critical value of about 0.683, so the correlation is not formally significant at the conventional threshold. Including PKS1138-2.160 weakens the coefficients to r_sp=-0.32 (pair fraction) and r_sp=-0.37 (merger rate), as stated in Section 3.3. The exclusion is motivated by the rest-frame UV imaging of PKS1138, but the sensitivity of the result to this single point is large. The authors should report p-values and bootstrap confidence intervals for all coefficients, and should present the analysis with and without PKS1138 as a clearly quantified robustness test rather than making the exluded-point version the default claim.
  3. [Sections 2.1-2.4 and 3.1] The ten protoclusters are assembled from very different selection functions: the COSMOS cores are selected near mass-completeness limits, SSA22 substructures are LAE-selected, and PKS1138 and the BOSS fields are HAE-selected. The number of spectroscopic members ranges from 12 to 235, and the field-density references and false-pair corrections differ correspondingly. This heterogeneity means that the measured pair fractions and velocity dispersions are not on a strictly common scale. Because the low-sigma BOSS points carry much of the weight of the anti-correlation, the authors should demonstrate that the trend is not an artifact of combining differently selected subsamples. A minimal check would be to recompute the Spearman coefficient separately for the mass-selected COSMOS cores and for the line-emitter-selected systems, and to discuss how selection-dependent incompleteness in N_spec affects the measured sigma_los values.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.1] The text refers to 'CC-0.239' where the protocluster name should be 'CC-2.239'.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'dispersion in size among of the member galaxies' contains an extra 'of' and should be reworded.
  3. [Section 4.1] The section title 'Increase of galaxy merger rate at increasing velocity dispersion' appears inconsistent with the reported anti-correlation; it should be revised to reflect a decrease, or rephrased to emphasize the colder systems.
  4. [Figures 2-4] The axis label 'km s□1' appears to have a missing minus sign in the exponent and should read 'km s^{-1}'.
  5. [Table 1] The table lists merger rates but not the directly measured pair fractions; since the merger rate is obtained by dividing the pair fraction by a redshift-dependent timescale, listing f_pair with its errors would help the reader verify the primary measurement.
  6. [Section 2.4] The sentence reporting 'a pair fraction of 22±5 (33±6) percent' should state whether these are 1-sigma Poisson uncertainties, for consistency with the error bars shown in the figures.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Close-pair velocity window (δv<500 km/s) couples pair fraction to σ_los, partly forcing the reported anti-correlation; no relaxed-window test is shown.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.2 (velocity dispersion) and Section 3.3, pair criterion (3) and f_pair definition]
    "We estimate σlos using the formula σlos = cσz/(1+z), where c represents the speed of light, and σz denotes the standard deviation of spectroscopic redshifts within each protocluster. ... (3) the relative line-of-sight velocity difference δv < 500 km s−1 (δz = δv ×(1+z)/c) for spectroscopically confirmed galaxies. ... The pair fraction is defined as fpair = Npair/Ntotal."

    The x-axis of Figs. 2-3 is σ_los computed from the same spectroscopically confirmed members, while the y-axis pair fraction counts only pairs with |δv| < 500 km/s. For a Gaussian velocity distribution, the probability that two members pass this window is erf(500/(√2 σ_los)): ≈0.99 at σ_los=200 km/s, ≈0.68 at 500 km/s, and ≈0.47 at 800 km/s. Thus f_pair, and the merger rate derived from it via a fixed time-scale, is multiplied by a σ_los-dependent selection factor even if the intrinsic merger rate is constant. The measured anti-correlation is therefore partly forced by the definition of the pair criterion; the paper does not correct for this velocity-window selection or test a wider window.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that galaxy pair fraction and merger rate anti-correlate with protocluster velocity dispersion—is not a fitted-input circularity in the sense of parameters fit to the same data, and the size-scatter relation (Fig. 4) is independently measured. However, the pair-fraction definition itself includes a fixed line-of-sight velocity cut δv<500 km/s, while the abscissa is the velocity dispersion of the same spectroscopic systems. For any Gaussian velocity distribution the fraction of pairs passing the cut is a decreasing function of σ_los, so a constant physical merger rate would produce a spurious anti-correlation of the kind reported. The paper applies the cut, subtracts false pairs, and regresses f_pair/R against σ_los without quantifying this selection effect or presenting a sensitivity test with a larger velocity window. The central quantitative claim therefore reduces in part to the construction of the pair criterion, not solely to an astrophysical trend. The other results (size scatter, overdensity comparison) do not show the same definitional coupling and are assessed independently.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on five domain assumptions, one of which (the delta-v < 500 km/s pair window) couples the y-axis to the x-axis and can create part of the observed anti-correlation by construction. The merger-rate scale depends on a literature merging timescale. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Pair velocity window = delta-v < 500 km/s
    Hand-chosen in Section 3.3, criterion (3), set by low spectral resolution of VUDS. This choice couples pair fraction to velocity dispersion and is the paper's weakest assumption.
  • Pair separation window = 5-30 kpc
    Standard close-pair selection in Section 3.3; affects pair counts but not fitted to the data.
  • Minimum pair mass ratio = mu > 0.25
    Threshold for major mergers in Section 3.3; hand-chosen.
  • Merging timescale = T_obs = -0.177*(1+z)+1.205 Gyr
    Taken from the Emerge simulation (O'Leary et al. 2021) and used to convert pair fraction into merger rate in Section 3.3. External calibration, not fitted to the data, but sets the absolute merger-rate scale.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The line-of-sight velocity dispersion of spectroscopically confirmed members is a valid measure of the protocluster dynamical state.
    Section 3.2. The authors note that potential anisotropy along the line of sight could limit this proxy.
  • ad hoc to paper The close-pair selection with delta-v < 500 km/s does not preferentially suppress pairs in high-sigma protoclusters.
    Section 3.3, pair criterion (3). No test or correction is presented; a fixed velocity window accepts a smaller fraction of genuine bound pairs in hotter systems, which can artificially generate the headline anti-correlation.
  • domain assumption The galaxy stellar mass function of the general field applies to protocluster cores when computing densities and completeness.
    Section 2.1: 'assuming that the GSFM applies equally to galaxies in both general fields and overdense structures'.
  • domain assumption The merging timescale from the Emerge simulation (O'Leary et al. 2021) applies to these z~2-3 protocluster galaxies.
    Section 3.3: merger rates are computed as pair fraction divided by this timescale.
  • domain assumption The field star-forming mass-size relation (van der Wel et al. 2014) is the correct reference for computing size scatter.
    Section 3.4: sigma_size is measured relative to this relation from 3D-HST.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A first measurement of galaxy merger rate increasing in dynamically colder protoclusters at cosmic noon." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GYREBFAV

@misc{pith2026241208336,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A first measurement of galaxy merger rate increasing in dynamically colder protoclusters at cosmic noon},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GYREBFAV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08336}
}
read the original abstract

The process of galaxy cluster formation likely leaves an imprint on the properties of its individual member galaxies. Understanding this process is essential for uncovering the evolutionary connections between galaxies and cosmic structures. Here we study a sample of ten protoclusters at z~2-3 in different dynamical states that we estimate based on spectroscopic data of their members. We combine the dynamical information with HST imaging to measure galaxy sizes and pair fractions. Our analysis reveals a clear anti-correlation between the velocity dispersion of the protocluster and its galaxy pair fractions (indicative of merger rates). The velocity dispersion also anti-correlates with the dispersion in size among of the member galaxies. These correlations may be explained by protoclusters in colder dynamical states maintaining a velocity dispersion and galaxy number density that boosts galaxy mergers, which in turn contributes to the structural expansion and compaction of galaxies. Our findings offer constraints for cosmological models regarding the evolution of galaxy morphology across different stages in the assembly of protoclusters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08336 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Density maps smoothed with a Gaussian kernel with 𝜎 = 1 arcmin (∼ 1.7 cMpc at 𝑧 = 2.5) of protoclusters at 𝑧 =2–3. The gray dashed lines outline the footprints for HST F160W observation in protoclusters SSA22-3.067, SSA22-3.093, BOSS1244-2.230, BOSS1244-2.246, and BOSS1542-2.241, while for F814W in PKS1138-2.160. Contour levels represent [2, 4, 6, 8, 10] times the number density of the general field as described in … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Galaxy merger rate as a function of velocity dispersion for proto￾clusters at 𝑧 = 2 − 3. The symbols used are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Merger rates as a function of the overdensity factor for our proto￾cluster sample. Symbols are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    V., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244634 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...670A..95A 670, A95

    Afanasiev A. V., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244634 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...670A..95A 670, A95

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244634 2023

  3. [3]

    Alberts S., Noble A., 2022, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe8110554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022Univ....8..554A 8, 554

    doi:10.3390/universe8110554 2022

  4. [4]

    X., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/784/2/152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...784..152A 784, 152

    An F. X., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/784/2/152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...784..152A 784, 152

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/784/2/152 2014

  5. [5]

    J., Cowie L

    Barger A. J., Cowie L. L., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acedae , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...956...95B 956, 95

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acedae 2023

  6. [6]

    C., Flynn K., Gebhardt K., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115487 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990AJ....100...32B 100, 32

    Beers T. C., Flynn K., Gebhardt K., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115487 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990AJ....100...32B 100, 32

    doi:10.1086/115487 1990

  7. [7]

    F., McIntosh D

    Bell E. F., McIntosh D. H., Katz N., Weinberg M. D., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378847 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJS..149..289B 149, 289

    doi:10.1086/378847 2003

  8. [8]

    R., Kofman L., Pogosyan D., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1038/380603a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996Natur.380..603B 380, 603

    Bond J. R., Kofman L., Pogosyan D., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1038/380603a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996Natur.380..603B 380, 603

    doi:10.1038/380603a0 1996

Show all 139 references
  1. [9]

    L., Storchi-Bergmann T., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174346 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...429..582C 429, 582

    Calzetti D., Kinney A. L., Storchi-Bergmann T., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174346 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...429..582C 429, 582

    1994 doi

  2. [10]

    M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/36 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...824...36C 824, 36

    Casey C. M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/36 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...824...36C 824, 36

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/808/2/L33 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808L..33C 808, L33

    Casey C. M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/808/2/L33 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808L..33C 808, L33

    2015 doi

  4. [12]

    M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309250 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...539..718C 539, 718

    Charlot S., Fall S. M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309250 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...539..718C 539, 718

    2000 doi

  5. [13]

    Chen Z., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3128 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.8950C 527, 8950

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Christensen C. R., Dav \'e R., Governato F., Pontzen A., Brooks A., Munshi F., Quinn T., Wadsley J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...824...57C 824, 57

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    L., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741....8C 741, 8

    Coil A. L., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741....8C 741, 8

    2011 doi

  8. [16]

    G., Baugh C

    Cole S., Lacey C. G., Baugh C. M., Frenk C. S., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03879.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000MNRAS.319..168C 319, 168

    2000

  9. [17]

    T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1446 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479..703C 479, 703

    Coogan R. T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1446 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479..703C 479, 703

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767..118C 767, 118

    Cool R. J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767..118C 767, 118

    2013 doi

  11. [19]

    A., van de Voort F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-041923-043618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ARA&A..61..473C 61, 473

    Crain R. A., van de Voort F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-041923-043618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ARA&A..61..473C 61, 473

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Cucciati O., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833655 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...619A..49C 619, A49

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    J., Khochfar S., Dunlop J

    Cullen F., McLure R. J., Khochfar S., Dunlop J. S., Dalla Vecchia C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.3006C 470, 3006

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    Daddi E., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038700 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A..78D 649, A78

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Dannerbauer H., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423771 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...570A..55D 570, A55

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    Darvish B., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab75c3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...892....8D 892, 8

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11177.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.374..427D 374, 427

    Dav \'e R., Oppenheimer B. D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11177.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.374..427D 374, 427

    2007

  18. [26]

    Dekel A., Burkert A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2331 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.1870D 438, 1870

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    Dekel A., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature07648 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009Natur.457..451D 457, 451

    2009 doi

  20. [28]

    G., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa756a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843..126D 843, 126

    Delahaye A. G., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa756a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843..126D 843, 126

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    Di Mascolo L., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-05761-x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.615..809D 615, 809

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    Diener C., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/802/1/31 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...802...31D 802, 31

    2015 doi

  23. [31]

    Doherty M., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...509A..83D 509, A83

    2010 doi

  24. [32]

    M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.04.005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PhR...973....1D 973, 1

    Donahue M., Voit G. M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.04.005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PhR...973....1D 973, 1

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    M., Wuyts S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..661F 58, 661

    F \"o rster Schreiber N. M., Wuyts S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..661F 58, 661

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    S., White S

    Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 2012, @doi [Annalen der Physik] 10.1002/andp.201200212 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AnP...524..507F 524, 507

    2012 doi

  27. [35]

    Gatica C., Demarco R., Dole H., Polletta M., Frye B., Martinache C., Rettura A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3404 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.3006G 527, 3006

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Hasinger G., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabacf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...858...77H 858, 77

    2018 doi

  29. [37]

    Hayashino T., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/424935 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AJ....128.2073H 128, 2073

    2004 doi

  30. [38]

    Hayashino T., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz388 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.5868H 484, 5868

    2019 doi

  31. [39]

    K., Geach J

    Hine N. K., Geach J. E., Alexander D. M., Lehmer B. D., Chapman S. C., Matsuda Y., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2448 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.2363H 455, 2363

    2016 doi

  32. [40]

    Horowitz B., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac982d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..263...27H 263, 27

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    Hung C.-L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...826..130H 826, 130

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    Ito K., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1f0c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...878...68I 878, 68

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    Jiang F., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1952 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.4801J 488, 4801

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    F., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe876 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910..106J 910, 106

    Jim \'e nez-Andrade E. F., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe876 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...910..106J 910, 106

    2021 doi

  37. [45]

    Jin S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040232 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...652A..11J 652, A11

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    Kashino D., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/777/1/L8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...777L...8K 777, L8

    2013 doi

  39. [47]

    Kato Y., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1237 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.3861K 460, 3861

    2016 doi

  40. [48]

    D., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/38 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...736...38K 736, 38

    Kocevski D. D., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/38 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...736...38K 736, 38

    2011 doi

  41. [49]

    Koulouridis E., Gkini A., Drigga E., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348212 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A.111K 684, A111

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    Koyama Y., Kodama T., Tadaki K.-i., Hayashi M., Tanaka M., Smail I., Tanaka I., Kurk J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.1551K 428, 1551

    2013 doi

  43. [51]

    Kretschmer M., Agertz O., Teyssier R., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2243 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497.4346K 497, 4346

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    Kriek M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..218...15K 218, 15

    2015 doi

  45. [53]

    Kubo M., Yamada T., Ichikawa T., Kajisawa M., Matsuda Y., Tanaka I., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/38 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799...38K 799, 38

    2015 doi

  46. [54]

    Kuchner U., Ziegler B., Verdugo M., Bamford S., H \"a u ler B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A..54K 604, A54

    2017 doi

  47. [55]

    D., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0005058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...358L...1K 358, L1

    Kurk J. D., et al., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0005058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...358L...1K 358, L1

    2000 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    Le F \`e vre O., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423829 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...576A..79L 576, A79

    2015 doi

  49. [57]

    Lee K.-G., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aace58 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..237...31L 237, 31

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    I., Boquien M., Andrews B

    Li H., Wuyts S., Lei H., Lin L., Lam M. I., Boquien M., Andrews B. H., Schneider D. P., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aafb6e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872...63L 872, 63

    2019 doi

  51. [59]

    J., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/516589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..172...70L 172, 70

    Lilly S. J., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/516589 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..172...70L 172, 70

    2007 doi

  52. [60]

    J., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/184/2/218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..184..218L 184, 218

    Lilly S. J., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/184/2/218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..184..218L 184, 218

    2009 doi

  53. [61]

    Liu S., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1543 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.2422L 523, 2422

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...773..154L 773, 154

    Lotz J. M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...773..154L 773, 154

    2013 doi

  55. [63]

    Madau P., Dickinson M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ARA&A..52..415M 52, 415

    2014 doi

  56. [64]

    S., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/827/2/L25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827L..25M 827, L25

    Martis N. S., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/827/2/L25 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...827L..25M 827, L25

    2016 doi

  57. [65]

    Matsuda Y., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/499071 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...634L.125M 634, L125

    2005 doi

  58. [66]

    Mawatari K., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acb707 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....165..208M 165, 208

    2023 doi

  59. [68]

    Mitra S., Dav \'e R., Finlator K., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1387 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452.1184M 452, 1184

    2015 doi

  60. [69]

    C., White S., 2010, Galaxy Formation and Evolution

    Mo H., van den Bosch F. C., White S., 2010, Galaxy Formation and Evolution

    2010

  61. [70]

    B., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0f84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...919...51M 919, 51

    Monson E. B., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0f84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...919...51M 919, 51

    2021 doi

  62. [71]

    B., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acd449 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951...15M 951, 15

    Monson E. B., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acd449 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951...15M 951, 15

    2023 doi

  63. [72]

    A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac71af , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...933..129M 933, 129

    Mowla L. A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac71af , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...933..129M 933, 129

    2022 doi

  64. [73]

    Nanayakkara T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...828...21N 828, 21

    2016 doi

  65. [74]

    Naufal A., Koyama Y., Shimakawa R., Kodama T., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acfb81 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...958..170N 958, 170

    2023 doi

  66. [75]

    B., Shapley A

    Nestor D. B., Shapley A. E., Kornei K. A., Steidel C. C., Siana B., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/47 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...765...47N 765, 47

    2013 doi

  67. [76]

    B., Ellis R

    Newman A. B., Ellis R. S., Bundy K., Treu T., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/162 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...746..162N 746, 162

    2012 doi

  68. [77]

    A., Moster B

    O'Leary J. A., Moster B. P., Naab T., Somerville R. S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3746 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.3215O 501, 3215

    2021 doi

  69. [78]

    Ocvirk P., Pichon C., Teyssier R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13763.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.390.1326O 390, 1326

    2008

  70. [79]

    A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-016-0100-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&ARv..24...14O 24, 14

    Overzier R. A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-016-0100-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&ARv..24...14O 24, 14

    2016 doi

  71. [80]

    A., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1038/35065528 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001Natur.410..169P 410, 169

    Peacock J. A., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1038/35065528 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001Natur.410..169P 410, 169

    2001 doi

  72. [81]

    Y., Ho L

    Peng C. Y., Ho L. C., Impey C. D., Rix H.-W., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340952 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124..266P 124, 266

    2002 doi

  73. [82]

    Y., Ho L

    Peng C. Y., Ho L. C., Impey C. D., Rix H.-W., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2097 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....139.2097P 139, 2097

    2010 doi

  74. [83]

    M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2784 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.1707P 518, 1707

    P \'e rez-Mart \' nez J. M., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2784 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.1707P 518, 1707

    2023 doi

  75. [84]

    Pierre M., Clerc N., Maughan B., Pacaud F., Papovich C., Willmer C. N. A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118169 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...540A...4P 540, A4

    2012 doi

  76. [85]

    Pillepich A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2338 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.3196P 490, 3196

    2019 doi

  77. [86]

    Polletta M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140612 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...654A.121P 654, A121

    2021 doi

  78. [87]

    Popesso P., Biviano A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066269 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...460L..23P 460, L23

    2006 doi

  79. [88]

    Qin J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3999 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528..658Q 528, 658

    2024 doi

  80. [89]

    Rennehan D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad793d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..114R 975, 114

    2024 doi

  81. [90]

    C., Bottrell C., Hani M

    Rennehan D., Babul A., Hayward C. C., Bottrell C., Hani M. H., Chapman S. C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa541 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.4607R 493, 4607

    2020 doi

  82. [91]

    B., Caputi K

    Rosani G., Caminha G. B., Caputi K. I., Deshmukh S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935782 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...633A.159R 633, A159

    2020 doi

  83. [92]

    Rost A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3792 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502..714R 502, 714

    2021 doi

  84. [93]

    Saez C., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv747 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450.2615S 450, 2615

    2015 doi

  85. [94]

    K., Ree C

    Sheen Y.-K., Yi S. K., Ree C. H., Lee J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/202/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJS..202....8S 202, 8

    2012 doi

  86. [95]

    D., Cai Z., Fan X., Zheng X

    Shi D. D., Cai Z., Fan X., Zheng X. Z., Huang Y.-H., Xu J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abfec0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...915...32S 915, 32

    2021 doi

  87. [96]

    D., Wang X., Zheng X

    Shi D. D., Wang X., Zheng X. Z., Cai Z., Fan X., Bian F., Teplitz H. I., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad17c3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...963...21S 963, 21

    2024 doi

  88. [97]

    arXiv:2403.06729

    Shibuya T., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2403.06729 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240306729S p. arXiv:2403.06729

    2024 doi arXiv

  89. [98]

    Shimakawa R., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.5630S 481, 5630

    2018 doi

  90. [99]

    Shimakawa R., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.3679S 528, 3679

    2024 doi

  91. [100]

    D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/12 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..220...12S 220, 12

    Silverman J. D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/12 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..220...12S 220, 12

    2015 doi

  92. [101]

    N., Geach J

    Sobral D., Smail I., Best P. N., Geach J. E., Matsuda Y., Stott J. P., Cirasuolo M., Kurk J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts096 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.1128S 428, 1128

    2013 doi

  93. [102]

    N., Smail I., Mobasher B., Stott J., Nisbet D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.3516S 437, 3516

    Sobral D., Best P. N., Smail I., Mobasher B., Stott J., Nisbet D., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.3516S 437, 3516

    2014 doi

  94. [103]

    S., Dav \'e R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ARA&A..53...51S 53, 51

    Somerville R. S., Dav \'e R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ARA&A..53...51S 53, 51

    2015 doi

  95. [104]

    S., White S

    Springel V., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature04805 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Natur.440.1137S 440, 1137

    2006 doi

  96. [105]

    A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac0833 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..256....9S 256, 9

    Stanford S. A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac0833 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..256....9S 256, 9

    2021 doi

  97. [106]

    C., Adelberger K

    Steidel C. C., Adelberger K. L., Dickinson M., Giavalisco M., Pettini M., Kellogg M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305073 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...492..428S 492, 428

    1998 doi

  98. [107]

    A., Kriek M., Price S

    Suess K. A., Kriek M., Price S. H., Barro G., 2019a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1bda , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...877..103S 877, 103

    doi

  99. [108]

    A., Kriek M., Price S

    Suess K. A., Kriek M., Price S. H., Barro G., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4db3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...885L..22S 885, L22

    doi

  100. [109]

    arXiv:2402.08729

    Szpila J., Dav \'e R., Rennehan D., Cui W., Hough R., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2402.08729 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240208729S p. arXiv:2402.08729

    2024 doi arXiv

  101. [110]

    J., Genzel R., Sternberg A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141034 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..157T 58, 157

    Tacconi L. J., Genzel R., Sternberg A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141034 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..157T 58, 157

    2020 doi

  102. [111]

    Tadaki K.-I., Kodama T., Koyama Y., Hayashi M., Tanaka I., Tokoku C., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/63.sp2.S437 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011PASJ...63S.437T 63, 437

    2011 doi

  103. [112]

    Tadaki K.-i., Kodama T., Tanaka I., Hayashi M., Koyama Y., Shimakawa R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/114 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...778..114T 778, 114

    2013 doi

  104. [113]

    Tanaka M., De Breuck C., Venemans B., Kurk J., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913939 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...518A..18T 518, A18

    2010 doi

  105. [114]

    Tanaka M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...772..113T 772, 113

    2013 doi

  106. [115]

    Tasca L. A. M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527963 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...600A.110T 600, A110

    2017 doi

  107. [116]

    S., Mart \' nez V

    Tempel E., Stoica R. S., Mart \' nez V. J., Liivam \"a gi L. J., Castellan G., Saar E., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2454 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438.3465T 438, 3465

    2014 doi

  108. [117]

    W., Shapley A

    Topping M. W., Shapley A. E., Steidel C. C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/824/1/L11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...824L..11T 824, L11

    2016 doi

  109. [118]

    Tozzi P., et al., 2022a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...662A..54T 662, A54

    doi

  110. [119]

    Tozzi P., et al., 2022b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244337 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...667A.134T 667, A134

    doi

  111. [120]

    H., Moustakas J., Gonzalez A

    Tran K.-V. H., Moustakas J., Gonzalez A. H., Bai L., Zaritsky D., Kautsch S. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/591422 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...683L..17T 683, L17

    2008 doi

  112. [121]

    Umehata H., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/815/1/L8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...815L...8U 815, L8

    2015 doi

  113. [122]

    P., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053941 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...461..823V 461, 823

    Venemans B. P., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053941 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...461..823V 461, 823

    2007 doi

  114. [123]

    Wang T., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/828/1/56 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...828...56W 828, 56

    2016 doi

  115. [124]

    Wang T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaeb2c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...867L..29W 867, L29

    2018 doi

  116. [125]

    Watson C., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab06ef , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...874...63W 874, 63

    2019 doi

  117. [126]

    R., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3078 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..258...11W 258, 11

    Weaver J. R., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac3078 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..258...11W 258, 11

    2022 doi

  118. [127]

    R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.184W 677, A184

    Weaver J. R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245581 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.184W 677, A184

    2023 doi

  119. [128]

    E., Pope A., Cybulski R., Casey C

    Whitaker K. E., Pope A., Cybulski R., Casey C. M., Popping G., Yun M. S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa94ce , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850..208W 850, 208

    2017 doi

  120. [129]

    D., Smit R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17248.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408.1818W 408, 1818

    White M., Cohn J. D., Smit R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17248.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408.1818W 408, 1818

    2010

  121. [130]

    M., Feng Y., Di Matteo T., Croft R., Lovell C

    Wilkins S. M., Feng Y., Di Matteo T., Croft R., Lovell C. C., Waters D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx841 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.2517W 469, 2517

    2017 doi

  122. [131]

    J., Somerville R

    Wright R. J., Somerville R. S., Lagos C. d. P., Schaller M., Dav \'e R., Angl \'e s-Alc \'a zar D., Genel S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1688 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.3417W 532, 3417

    2024 doi

  123. [132]

    Xu C., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acdb5a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951L..21X 951, L21

    2023 doi

  124. [133]

    Yajima H., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3092 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.4037Y 509, 4037

    2022 doi

  125. [134]

    Yamada T., Matsuda Y., Kousai K., Hayashino T., Morimoto N., Umemura M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/751/1/29 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...751...29Y 751, 29

    2012 doi

  126. [135]

    J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/75 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792...75Z 792, 75

    Zahid H. J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/75 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...792...75Z 792, 75

    2014 doi

  127. [136]

    Zeballos M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1714 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.4577Z 479, 4577

    2018 doi

  128. [137]

    Zhang Y., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac824 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.512.4893Z 512, 4893

    2022 doi

  129. [138]

    Z., Cai Z., An F

    Zheng X. Z., Cai Z., An F. X., Fan X., Shi D. D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2882 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.4354Z 500, 4354

    2021 doi

  130. [139]

    Zolotov A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv740 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450.2327Z 450, 2327

    2015 doi

  131. [140]

    van der Wel A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/28 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...788...28V 788, 28

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.