Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 30 references

Apollon Real-Time Adaptive Optics (ARTAO) -- Astronomy-Inspired Wavefront Stabilization in Ultraintense Lasers

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A real-time adaptive optics system driven by a 905-nm pilot beam stabilizes a high-power laser's wavefront, raising the minimum Strehl ratio from 0.65 to 0.96.

desk verdict First real-time AO loop on an ultraintense laser, with solid short-term pilot-beam results; the 'feasibility established' conclusion outruns the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.08418 v2 pith:PVTP73Y4 submitted 2024-12-11 physics.optics hep-ex

Jonas Benjamin Ohland , Nathalie Lebas , Vincent Deo , Olivier Guyon , François Mathieu , Patrick Audebert , Dimitrios Papadopoulos This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticshep-ex
keywords real-timeadaptiveopticshigh-powerlaserwavefrontstabilizationpilotbeamdeformablemirrorShack-HartmannsensorGPUcontrolApollon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

High-power lasers that deliver ultrashort pulses suffer from dynamic wavefront errors—air turbulence, vibrations, and thermal drift—that degrade shot-to-shot reproducibility and force long cooldown periods. The authors adapted real-time adaptive optics from astronomy to this setting: a continuous 905-nm pilot beam travels the same path as the main pulse, a Shack-Hartmann sensor samples it at several kilohertz, and a GPU-based controller drives a bimorph deformable mirror to cancel the measured aberrations. On the Apollon beamline, closing this loop lifted the minimum Strehl ratio from 0.65 to 0.96 and achieved a 96.8-Hz crossover frequency. The paper's central claim is that this is the first successful implementation of real-time adaptive optics in a high-power laser, establishing the feasibility of the approach, though safe operation with full-energy amplified shots is explicitly deferred to future work.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the off-spectral pilot beam: a fiber-coupled 905-nm continuous laser diode injected after the second amplifier and co-propagating with the main beam to the sensor assembly, where dichroic and spectral filters separate it from the 730-890 nm main spectrum. Because the pilot beam continuously samples the same turbulent air path as the main pulse, the adaptive loop has a real-time signal even between shots. The supporting machinery is a custom Shack-Hartmann sensor with a micro-lens array and a 7-kHz PCIe camera, a 96-actuator bimorph deformable mirror placed before the penultimate amplifier to pre-compensate aberrations, and a GPU-based controller built on an open-source adaptive-optics framework, with a frequency-domain transfer-function model used to predict loop stability and crossover.

What would settle it

Fire a full-energy amplified shot while the loop is closed on the pilot beam and record the main-beam wavefront in the same diagnostic plane immediately after; if the difference between the measured main-beam wavefront and the pilot-beam-predicted wavefront exceeds the paper's ~20% RMS threshold, or if the loop's pre-compensation creates hotspots that damage optics, the claimed feasibility for real operations is disproven.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors claim that real-time wavefront control is both necessary and achievable in ultraintense laser systems. They show, by constructing and testing the ARTAO loop at the Apollon facility, that the dynamic aberrations of a multi-petawatt-class beamline can be measured and corrected in real time using an off-spectral pilot beam at 905 nm that co-propagates with the main beam but is spectrally separated by dichroic filters. The deformable mirror pre-compensates aberrations before the final amplifier, and the loop runs at 2.6 kHz acquisition and 1.3 kHz control, rejecting disturbances up to 96.8 Hz. The wavefront of the pilot and main beams correlated to better than 20% RMS difference, and short-term closed-loop operation raised the guaranteed Strehl ratio from 0.65 to 0.96. The paper concludes that the feasibility of real-time adaptive optics in high-power lasers has been established, while cautioning that long-term stability, machine-safety interlocks, and operator interfaces remain to be solved before routine shot delivery.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scheme relies on the 905-nm pilot beam's wavefront remaining a faithful proxy for the main beam's wavefront during and after real high-energy shots; the paper validates this correlation only without amplified shots, leaving co-propagation under the intended operating conditions untested.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the pilot-beam correlation holds during full-energy shots, the system can keep the wavefront stable right up to shot delivery, reducing shot-to-shot fluctuations and experimental error bars.
  • The demonstrated 96.8-Hz crossover covers the dominant air-turbulence and pointing fluctuations at Apollon, implying that dynamic aberrations, not just static ones, can be addressed in real time.
  • The system remains stable during amplifier pump events, recovering within tens of milliseconds, which is far shorter than the shot repetition period, a necessary condition for operation at higher repetition rates.
  • The approach is portable: the controller software, sensor, and deformable mirror choices are based on mature, open tools and consumer-grade hardware, so other high-energy laser facilities can adapt them.
  • Once long-term stability and interlocks are solved, real-time adaptive optics could allow glass-based high-energy lasers, such as inertial-fusion drivers, to mitigate thermal fluctuations and shorten cooldown times.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test to validate the core assumption would be to record both pilot and main wavefronts during an actual amplified shot; the paper's correlation measurement was made without firing the main beam, so a co-propagation check under real thermal and nonlinear loading is the decisive experiment.
  • If the pilot-beam approach survives that test, the same scheme could be extended to other spectral windows or to multiple pilot wavelengths to disentangle thermal and turbulent contributions.
  • The observed 35-Hz pointing oscillations and the ringing of the lowest deformable-mirror modes suggest that a fast steering mirror dedicated to tip/tilt, cascaded with the deformable mirror, could push the effective correction bandwidth well beyond 100 Hz; the authors note this as future work.
  • The long-term instability tied to lateral misregistration between deformable mirror and wavefront sensor could be turned into a diagnostic: monitoring the correlation peak position could serve as an early warning for environmental drift in any adaptive-optics-equipped laser system.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the design, integration, and testing of ARTAO, a real-time adaptive optics system at the Apollon high-power laser facility. A 905 nm continuous-wave pilot beam is injected into the beamline and separated before the compressor; a bimorph deformable mirror pre-compensates aberrations, and a custom Shack-Hartmann sensor with a GPU-based CACAO real-time controller closes the loop at 2.6 kHz. Testbench measurements characterize DM latency, rise time, and loop frequency response; on the Apollon beamline, pilot-to-main wavefront correlation is measured over one minute, short-term closed-loop operation raises the pilot-beam Strehl ratio from a minimum of 0.65 to 0.96, and the spectral gain curve shows a 96.8 Hz crossover. The paper candidly reports unresolved issues in long-term stability, machine safety, and shot-mode operation, and concludes that the feasibility of RTAO has been established.

Significance. If the reported results hold, the paper is a valuable technology-transfer demonstration: it shows that an astronomy-derived GPU-based real-time control framework can run on a high-energy laser beamline, and it identifies environment-specific challenges, such as amplifier fluorescence at the pilot wavelength and long-term lateral misregistration, that future implementations must solve. The strengths include direct pilot-to-main wavefront correlation measurements, reproducible use of the open-source CACAO framework, and an unusually honest discussion of the gaps between laboratory demonstration and operational deployment. However, the headline feasibility claim is broader than the evidence presented: the correlation that is supposed to make pilot-beam correction valid for the main beam has not been demonstrated under amplified-shot conditions, and the Strehl improvement is measured on the pilot beam only.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 8, Secs. 6.2 and 6.4] The conclusion that "the feasibility of RTAO has therefore been established" is not supported by the data in the intended operating regime. The pilot-to-main wavefront correlation in Sec. 6.2 (Fig. 11) was measured over a one-minute, actively disturbed sequence with no amplified shots, and Sec. 6.4 shows that merely pumping the amplifiers saturates the Shack-Hartmann sensor and produces erroneous tilt. Since Sec. 7 explicitly defers amplified-shot operation, the load-bearing assumption that correcting the pilot beam corrects the main beam during and after multi-hundred-joule shots is unvalidated. I recommend either adding shot-mode correlation data or re-scoping the conclusion to "short-term, pilot-only stabilization is demonstrated; shot-mode correlation remains to be validated."
  2. [Sec. 6.3 and Sec. 8] The claimed Strehl improvement (minimum 0.65 to 0.96) is computed from the pilot beam's near-field via an FFT relative to a reference wavefront, under the explicit assumption that all static aberrations are removed. It is not an on-shot measurement of the main beam. The abstract and conclusion phrases "guaranteed Strehl ratio of >0.96" and "a statically fully corrected beam" should be qualified as pilot-beam, short-term, static-reference values, otherwise readers may infer main-beam performance that was not measured.
  3. [Secs. 5.1, 5.3, 6.3 and Table 1] The agreement between the control-loop model and the experimental gain curves is partly a calibration consistency check rather than an independent validation. The loop delay Tc = 1.2 ms is obtained by fitting the model to the testbench frequency response, and in Sec. 6.3 the feedback gain is adjusted from 0.27 to 0.35 (factor 1.3) to make the Apollon data match the model; leakage and other parameters are also treated as adjustable. I recommend stating parameter uncertainties and, if possible, a cross-validation on a second data set, so the model's predictive value is clearer.
  4. [Sec. 7.1 and Sec. 8] The long-term stability limitation documented in Sec. 7.1 is relevant to the feasibility claim: closed-loop operation is stable for roughly 30 minutes before intermittent instabilities appear, and manual realignment of a steering mirror is needed to restore stability. Because the conclusion claims feasibility while simultaneously stating that long-term stability and safety mechanisms are unresolved, the feasibility claim should be explicitly scoped to short-term, supervised operation, or the paper should present a clear path to meeting the operational requirements.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3.2] The phrase "which we decided to du at Apollon" appears to be a typo for "do at Apollon."
  2. [Sec. 5.1] In the description of the frame-transfer component, the sentence beginning "We represented the delay due to the WFS frame transmission Represented as a simple delay" contains a duplicated and incomplete construction; please rewrite.
  3. [Table 1] The table lists the same value, 1/(7 kHz), for both the WFS exposure time Texp and the frame transfer time Ttrans; since these are physically different delays, the text should clarify whether they are equal by design or only approximately equal in the model.
  4. [Sec. 6.3 and Sec. 8] The conclusion states an acquisition rate of 2.6 kHz and a control speed of 1.3 kHz, while Table 1 and Sec. 6.3 describe a control period T = 1/(2.6 kHz); the factor of two should be explained.
  5. [Sec. 6.3] The word "opeartion" in the caption of Fig. 13 should be "operation."
  6. [Sec. 7.2] The sentence "This issue becomes much more prominent when sudden weather changes such as thunderstorms occur" is clear in context, but the preceding sentence in Sec. 2 ends with the fragment "operating RTAO systems in." Please complete the sentence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: headline Strehl and crossover figures are measured, not derived from fitted inputs; CACAO self-citations are support, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental measurements rather than derivations from fitted inputs. The Strehl improvement (0.65 to 0.96), the 96.8 Hz crossover, and the pilot-main difference RMS below 20% are all read out from recorded wavefront sequences, not generated by the control-loop model. The model in Sec. 5.1 is used for design and later compared with data; in Sec. 5.3 the loop delay is fitted to the measured frequency response, and in Sec. 6.3 the gain is adjusted to 0.35 to match the data. This is in-sample model calibration rather than a prediction forced by construction: the fitted delay does not by itself determine the measured rejection shape or the headline stability numbers. Similarly, the pilot-beam correlation analysis in Sec. 6.2 fits an affine transformation to the same one-minute sequence, so the <20% residual is partly an in-sample fit residual rather than an out-of-sample prediction; however, the affine map has few degrees of freedom, and the paper does not present that residual as a prediction derived from the fit. The CACAO/SCExAO references [20-22] are self-citations in the sense that Guyon and Deo are co-authors, but the feasibility claim rests on the measured loop performance, not on the authority of those citations. Finally, the conclusion that feasibility has been established despite the deferral of amplified-shot operation is a support gap or correctness risk, not a circularity: no quantity is defined in terms of the very result it is supposed to establish. The minor in-sample fitting and non-load-bearing self-citation justify a low nonzero score, but no step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard adaptive-optics components and a set of measured or chosen control parameters. No new physical entities are introduced. The least-supported elements are the pilot-beam proxy assumption under shot conditions and the linear model's fidelity, both noted in the paper as future work.

free parameters (4)
  • Effective loop delay Tc = 1.2 ms (testbench), 1.0 ms (Apollon)
    Used as the single fit parameter in the error transfer function to match measured spectral gain (Section 5.3, Fig. 6).
  • Modal gain correction factor = about 1.3 (gain 0.27 to 0.35)
    Empirically increased the model gain to reproduce the Apollon gain curve because the real loop applied 1.4x higher gain on Tip/Tilt modes (Section 6.3, Fig. 13).
  • Leakage multiplier lambda = 0.999 (testbench), 0.99 (Apollon)
    Hand-chosen leaky-integrator coefficient affecting loop stability; part of the model parameters in Table 1.
  • Feedback gain G = 0.5 target, 0.27 and 0.35 in Apollon
    Control gain selected by the operator at the edge of stability; used in the model comparisons.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The linear time-invariant single-input-single-output model (Eq. 1) captures the loop dynamics well enough for stability and rejection analysis.
    Composed of standard control blocks (exposure, frame transfer, controller, leakage, driver hold, DM ramp); validated by fitting delay to measured gain curves, not by an independent verification of each block.
  • domain assumption The Shack-Hartmann spot centroid algorithm gives accurate wavefront slopes at 2.6 kHz.
    Algorithm described in Section 4.4; accuracy is inferred from closed-loop performance, not from comparison to a known wavefront.
  • domain assumption The 905 nm pilot beam and the main beam are coupled by a stationary affine transformation over time.
    An affine map is fitted from the sample correlation matrix in Section 6.2 using a one-minute recording without amplified shots; the transformation is assumed to hold on longer timescales and during shots.
  • domain assumption Air turbulence in the beamline follows Kolmogorov statistics as assumed in the testbench disturbance.
    The testbench uses a swept Kolmogorov screen (Sec. 5.3); the Apollon turbulence spectrum is only characterized by fluctuation rates up to 70 Hz, not by its spatial statistics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Apollon Real-Time Adaptive Optics (ARTAO) -- Astronomy-Inspired Wavefront Stabilization in Ultraintense Lasers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PVTP73Y4

@misc{pith2026241208418,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Apollon Real-Time Adaptive Optics (ARTAO) -- Astronomy-Inspired Wavefront Stabilization in Ultraintense Lasers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PVTP73Y4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.08418}
}
read the original abstract

Traditional wavefront control in high-energy, high-intensity laser systems usually lacks real-time capability, failing to address dynamic aberrations. This limits experimental accuracy due to shot-to-shot fluctuations and necessitates long cool-down phases to mitigate thermal effects, particularly as higher repetition rates become essential, e.g. in Inertial Fusion research. This paper details the development and implementation of a real-time capable adaptive optics system at the Apollon laser facility. Inspired by astronomical adaptive optics, the system uses a fiber-coupled 905 nm laser diode as a pilot beam that allows for spectral separation, bypassing the constraints of pulsed lasers. A GPU-based controller, built on the open-source CACAO framework, manages a loop comprising a bimorph deformable mirror and high-speed Shack-Hartmann sensor. Initial tests showed excellent stability and effective aberration correction. However, integration into the Apollon laser revealed critical challenges unique to the laser environment that must be resolved to ensure safe operation with amplified shots.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.08418 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sketch of the Laser AMplification area (LAM) at Apollon. The last amplifier ("Amp300") was known for causing beam instabilities due to air movement in the beampath. fluctuated between 0.2 and 0.9 within a single second, and the local wavefront slope fluctuated at up to 70 Hz. These fluctuations not only failed to meet the specifications of Apollon (maximum 10% Strehl ratio fluctuations) but also rendered the use of … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Bode plot of the feedback transfer function F(s) (left) and the error transfer function R(s) (right) according to Eq. (1), using the parameter values from the "Target" column in table 1. The parameters are listed in table 1. The corresponding error transfer function of the loop is R(s) = 1 1 + F(s) , (1) where F(s) is the feedback transfer function, which in turn is the product of all transfer functions discusse… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic of the test-bench setup, to scale. To evaluate the functionality and performance of the ARTAO system, we set up a testbench with a simplified configuration (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Step response of two DM modes over time (open loop). The dashed lines indicate the 10%-90% levels and corresponding settling times. Top: first mode, featuring severe ringing due to the mechanical DM properties. Bottom: fourth mode with a regular settling behavior. All …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Step responses of a full set of mirror modes over time. System Frequency Response: We measured the system’s frequency response using CACAO’s internal turbulence em￾ulator, which introduced disturbances on the DM by sweep￾ing a Kolmogorov screen[29] across the actuator …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic setup of ARTAO in the Apollon laser chain propagation of both the pilot and main beams. In order to enable easy bypassing of the DM, we integrated a beam detour prior to the fourth amplifier, where the beam diameter is 55 mm, ensuring a low fluence to prevent…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Sketch of the diagnositc setup prior to the 1 PW compressor in side- (a) and top view (b). The main beam path is shown in red, while the pilot beam path is indicated in orange. For the sensor setup, we implemented a dedicated beam sensor configuration right before the …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Example of a mapped WF between the main beam WFS (top row) and the pilot beam WFS (bottom row), where the first column is the raw WF, the second one is the mapped WF from the other WFS, respectively, and the last column is the difference between the two. Note that the…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Bottom: the sample-wise correlation matrix between the WFS of the main beam and the pilot beam over the recorded sequence without tilt and mean WF. Top: example correlation of the main beam WF to a randomly picked location of the pilot WF (left) and vice versa (right).…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: RMS of the main- and the pilot beam WF, as well as the difference between the two, over a time frame of one minute. The beam was actively disturbed using a hot air source for this measurement. 6.3. Short-term Stabilization To evaluate the short-term stabilization perf…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Recorded gain curve of ARTAO on the pilot beam WF in the Apollon beamline under regular opeartion conditions, compared with two theoretical curves (dashed lines) with parameters from table 1. The dashed red curve uses the parameters of the real-world loop, while we tw…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Top: time series measurement of the Strehl ratio (compared to the reference WF, calculated via the FFT of the measured NF) of the pilot beam, where ARTAO is activated at t=0. Bottom: the histogram of the corresponding data series. significantly higher gain (factor 1.4…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Time series measurement of the beam pointing of the pilot beam, where ARTAO is activated at t=0. The tilt X (red) and tilt Y (blue) curves represent the tilt-portion of the recorded WF, relative to the reference, and is given in peak-to-valley in terms of the central …
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Imprints of artificially large DM strokes onto the NF fluence in a non-conjugate image plane, where each NF corresponds to a different set of random actuator positions. Another issue arises from the coupling between the pre￾compensated WF and the NF intensity. Aberrat…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The WF RMS of the pilot beam under closed loop operation over an extended time frame. The insert plots are three selected WF frames from stable conditions in the beginning (left) and the end of the recording (center), as well as from a period of instability (right). A…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wave-front correction of femtosecond terawatt lasers by deformable mirrors

    Frédéric Druon, Gilles Chériaux, Jérôme Faure, John Nees, Marc Nantel, Anatoly Maksimchuk, Gérard Mourou, Jean Christophe Chanteloup, and Gleb Vdovin. Wave-front correction of femtosecond terawatt lasers by deformable mirrors. Opt. Lett., 23(13):1043–1045, Jul 1998. doi: 10.1364 /OL.23.001043. URL https: //opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-23-13-1043

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    Correction of strong phase and amplitude modulations by two deformable mirrors in a multistaged ti: sapphire laser

    Horst Baumhacker, Georg Pretzler, Klaus J Witte, Manuel Hegelich, Malte Kaluza, Stefan Karsch, A Kudryashov, V Samarkin, and A Roukossouev. Correction of strong phase and amplitude modulations by two deformable mirrors in a multistaged ti: sapphire laser. Optics letters, 27(17):1570–1572, 2002

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    Generation of a single hot spot by use of a deformable mirror and study of its propagation in an underdense plasma

    Benoit Wattellier, Julien Fuchs, Ji-Ping Zou, Jean- Christophe Chanteloup, Heidi Bandulet, Pierre Michel, Christine Labaune, Sylvie Depierreux, Alexis Kudryashov, and Alexander Aleksandrov. Generation of a single hot spot by use of a deformable mirror and study of its propagation in an underdense plasma. JOSA B, 20(8):1632–1642, 2003

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Wide aperture piezo- ceramic deformable mirrors for aberration correction in high-power lasers

    Vadim Samarkin, Alexander Alexandrov, Gilles Bor- soni, Takahisa Jitsuno, Pavel Romanov, Aleksei Rukosuev, and Alexis Kudryashov. Wide aperture piezo- ceramic deformable mirrors for aberration correction in high-power lasers. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 4:e4, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Ultra- compact post-compressor on-shot wavefront measure- ment for beam correction at phelix

    JB Ohland, U Eisenbarth, B Zielbauer, Y Zobus, D Posor, J Hornung, D Reemts, and V Bagnoud. Ultra- compact post-compressor on-shot wavefront measure- ment for beam correction at phelix. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 10:e18, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Zernike- coefficient extraction via helical beam reconstruction for optimization (zehbro) in the far field

    JB Ohland, D Posor, U Eisenbarth, V Iancu, R Ungureanu, D Ursescu, and V Bagnoud. Zernike- coefficient extraction via helical beam reconstruction for optimization (zehbro) in the far field. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 11:e86, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Fast stabilization of a high-energy ultrafast opa with adaptive lenses

    Matteo Negro, Martino Quintavalla, Jacopo Mocci, Anna G Ciriolo, Michele Devetta, Riccardo Muradore, Salvatore Stagira, Caterina V ozzi, and Stefano Bonora. Fast stabilization of a high-energy ultrafast opa with adaptive lenses. Scientific reports, 8(1):14317, 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Wavefront degradation of a 200 tw laser from heat-induced deformation of in-vacuum compressor gratings

    Vincent Leroux, Spencer W Jolly, Matthias Schnepp, Timo Eichner, Sören Jalas, Manuel Kirchen, Philipp Messner, Christian Werle, Paul Winkler, and Andreas R Maier. Wavefront degradation of a 200 tw laser from heat-induced deformation of in-vacuum compressor gratings. Optics express, 26(10):13061–13071, 2018

    work page 2018

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    Design and setup of a post-compressor adaptive optics loop at PHELIX

    Jonas Benjamin Ohland. Design and setup of a post-compressor adaptive optics loop at PHELIX. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    The subaru coronagraphic extreme adaptive optics system: enabling high-contrast imaging on solar- system scales

    N Jovanovic, Frantz Martinache, Olivier Guyon, Christophe Clergeon, Garima Singh, Tomoyuki Kudo, Vincent Garrel, Kevin Newman, D Doughty, Julien Lozi, et al. The subaru coronagraphic extreme adaptive optics system: enabling high-contrast imaging on solar- system scales. Public...

    2015

  3. [11]

    Adaptive optics: principles and applications in ophthalmology

    Engin Akyol, Ahmed M Hagag, Sobha Sivaprasad, and Andrew J Lotery. Adaptive optics: principles and applications in ophthalmology. Eye, 35(1):244–264, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Coherent free-space optical communications: Opportunities and challenges

    Fernando P Guiomar, Marco A Fernandes, José Leonardo Nascimento, Vera Rodrigues, and Paulo P Monteiro. Coherent free-space optical communications: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 40(10):3173–3186, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Fast adaptive optical system for 1.5 km horizontal beam propagation

    Alexis V Kudryashov, Alexey Rukosuev, Vadim Samarkin, Ilia Galaktionov, and Evgeniy Kopylov. Fast adaptive optical system for 1.5 km horizontal beam propagation. In Unconventional and Indirect Imaging, Image Reconstruction, and Wavefront Sensing 2018, volume 10772, pages 250–2...

    2018

  6. [14]

    Burdonov, A

    K. Burdonov, A. Fazzini, V . Lelasseux, J. Albrecht, P. Antici, Y . Ayoul, A. Beluze, D. Cavanna, T. Ceccotti, M. Chabanis, A. Chaleil, S. N. Chen, Z. Chen, F. Consoli, M. Cuciuc, X. Davoine, J. P. Delaneau, E. d’Humières, J.-L. Dubois, C. Evrard, E. Filippov, A. Freneaux, P. ...

    2021

  7. [15]

    Ohland et al

    DN Papadopoulos, Y Ayoul, A Beluze, F Gobert, 14 J.B. Ohland et al. D Mataja, A Fréneaux, N Lebas, M Chabanis, M Dumergue, P Audebert, et al. The apollon laser facility upgrade to the multi-pw level. In High Intensity Lasers and High Field Phenomena, pages HTu2B–2. Optica Publ...

    2024

  8. [16]

    A study on the e ffects and visibility of low-order aberrations on laser beams with orbital angular momentum

    Jonas B Ohland, Udo Eisenbarth, Markus Roth, and Vincent Bagnoud. A study on the e ffects and visibility of low-order aberrations on laser beams with orbital angular momentum. Applied Physics B, 125:1–10, 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    Ao3k at subaru: First on-sky results of the facility extreme-ao, 2024

    Julien Lozi, Kyohoon Ahn, Hannah Blue, Alicia Chun, Christophe Clergeon, Vincent Deo, Olivier Guyon, Takashi Hattori, Yosuke Minowa, Shogo Nishiyama, Yoshito Ono, Shin Oya, Yuhei Takagi, Sebastien Vievard, and Maria Vincent. Ao3k at subaru: First on-sky results of the facility...

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Multiconjugate adaptive optics for astronomy

    François Rigaut and Benoit Neichel. Multiconjugate adaptive optics for astronomy. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 56(1):277–314, 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    Principles of adaptive optics

    Robert K Tyson and Benjamin West Frazier. Principles of adaptive optics. CRC press, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    The compute and control for adaptive optics (cacao) real- time control software package

    Olivier Guyon, Arnaud Sevin, Damien Gratadour, Julien Bernard, Hatem Ltaief, Dalal Sukkari, Sylvain Cetre, Nour Skaf, Julien Lozi, Frantz Martinache, et al. The compute and control for adaptive optics (cacao) real- time control software package. In Adaptive Optics Systems VI, ...

    2018

  13. [21]

    Adaptive optics real-time control with the compute and control for adaptive optics (cacao) software framework

    Olivier Guyon, Arnaud Sevin, Florian Ferreira, Hatem Ltaief, Jared Males, Vincent Deo, Damien Gratadour, Sylvain Cetre, Frantz Martinache, Julien Lozi, et al. Adaptive optics real-time control with the compute and control for adaptive optics (cacao) software framework. In Adap...

    2020

  14. [22]

    The cacao real-time computer for adaptive optics: updates, performance, and development plans

    Vincent Deo, Olivier Guyon, Jared Males, Kyohoon Ahn, Brian Carcich, Sylvain Cetre, Florian Ferreira, Damien Gratadour, Janis Hagelberg, R Jansen-Clem, et al. The cacao real-time computer for adaptive optics: updates, performance, and development plans. In Adaptive Optics Syst...

    2024

  15. [23]

    Design of deformable mirrors for high power lasers

    Stefano Bonora, Jan Pilar, Antonio Lucianetti, and Tomas Mocek. Design of deformable mirrors for high power lasers. High power laser Science and Engineering, 4:e16, 2016

    2016

  16. [24]

    Scalable platform for adaptive optics real-time control, part 1: concept, architecture, and validation

    Avinash Surendran, Mahesh P Burse, Anamparambu N Ramaprakash, Jyotirmay Paul, Hillol K Das, and Padmakar S Parihar. Scalable platform for adaptive optics real-time control, part 1: concept, architecture, and validation. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Syst...

    2018

  17. [25]

    1.5 khz adaptive optical system for free-space communication tasks

    Alexey L Rukosuev, Vadim N Belousov, Ilya V Galak- tionov, Alexis V Kudryashov, Alexander N Nikitin, Vadim V Samarkin, and Julia V Sheldakova. 1.5 khz adaptive optical system for free-space communication tasks. In Free-Space Laser Communications XXXII, volume 11272, pages 331–...

    2020

  18. [26]

    Real-time wavefront control for the palm-3000 high order adaptive optics system

    Tuan N Truong, Antonin H Bouchez, Richard G Dekany, Jean C Shelton, Mitchell Troy, John R Angione, Rick S Burruss, John L Cromer, Stephen R Guiwits, and Jennifer E Roberts. Real-time wavefront control for the palm-3000 high order adaptive optics system. In Adaptive Optics Syst...

  19. [27]

    Kalao the swift adaptive optics imager on the 1.2 m euler swiss telescope in la silla, chile

    Janis Hagelberg, Nathanaël Restori, François Wildi, Bruno Chazelas, Christoph Baranec, Olivier Guyon, Ludovic Genolet, Michaël Sordet, and Reed Riddle. Kalao the swift adaptive optics imager on the 1.2 m euler swiss telescope in la silla, chile. In Adaptive Optics Systems VII,...

    2020

  20. [28]

    Lisa A. Poyneer. Scene-based shack-hartmann wave- front sensing: analysis and simulation. Appl. Opt., 42(29):5807–5815, Oct 2003. doi: 10.1364 /AO.42. 005807. URL https: //opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm? URI=ao-42-29-5807

    2003

  21. [29]

    Local structure of turbulence in an incompressible viscous fluid at very high reynolds num- bers

    A N Kolmogorov. Local structure of turbulence in an incompressible viscous fluid at very high reynolds num- bers. Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 10(6):734, jun 1968. doi: 10.1070/PU1968v010n06ABEH003710. URL https: // dx.doi.org/10.1070/PU1968v010n06ABEH003710

    1968 doi

  22. [30]

    F., and Defrère, D

    Berdeu, A., Bonnet, H., Le Bouquin, J.-B., Édouard, C., Gomes, T., Shchekaturov, P., Dembet, R., Paumard, T., Oberti, S., Kolb, J., Millour, F., Berio, P., Lai, O., Eisenhauer, F., Garcia, P., Straubmeier, C., Kreidberg, L., Hönig, S. F., and Defrère, D. Estimation of the late...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.