Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Switchable Chern insulator, isospin competitions and charge density waves in rhombohedral graphene moire superlattices

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Transport measurements show that a correlated insulator at one electron per moiré cell in rhombohedral hexalayer graphene on hBN is a Chern insulator whose Chern number switches sign with doping.

desk verdict Solid second-generation moiré graphene transport study, but the headline ‘switchable Chern insulator’ only holds at finite B, so the claim needs a rewrite. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09985 v1 pith:BO5A4NUX submitted 2024-12-13 cond-mat.str-el

Jian Zheng , Size Wu , Kai Liu , Bosai Lyu , Shuhan Liu , Yating Sha , Zhengxian Li , Kenji Watanabe
show 4 more authors
Takashi Taniguchi Jinfeng Jia Zhiwen Shi Guorui Chen
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords rhombohedralhexalayergraphenehBNmoirésuperlatticeswitchableCherninsulatororbitalmagnetizationisospinordertransportgapchargedensitywaveanomalousHalleffect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports transport experiments on rhombohedrally stacked hexalayer graphene aligned with hexagonal boron nitride, forming a moiré superlattice, and claims that at filling $\nu=1$ the correlated insulator is a Chern insulator whose Chern number can be switched by doping: $C=-1$ on the weak-hole side and $C=+1$ on the weak-electron side of the gap. The paper attributes the sign reversal to the total orbital magnetization $M=M_{\rm bulk}+M_{\rm edge}$ changing sign as the Fermi level crosses the gap, so that both Chern signs are stable in a magnetic field. At $\nu=2$, three insulating states are distinguished by their transport-gap response to in-plane and perpendicular magnetic fields, and are identified as spin-antiferromagnetic, spin-polarized, and valley-polarized insulators. In a larger-twist device, insulating charge-density-wave states appear at $\nu=1/3$ and $2/3$ at zero field and a stripe insulator at $\nu=1/2$ in a perpendicular field. If correct, these observations make a single rhombohedral graphene moiré device a tunable platform for orbital topology, spin-valley order, and charge order.

What carries the argument

The central object is the orbital Chern insulator's total magnetization, $M=M_{\rm bulk}+M_{\rm edge}$, whose sign can reverse as the Fermi level crosses the gap; the paper uses this reversal to explain why both $C=-1$ and $C=+1$ can be realized on opposite doping sides of the $\nu=1$ insulator. For the $\nu=2$ classification, the operative mechanism is the distinct Zeeman response of spin versus valley order: spin couples to both in-plane and perpendicular magnetic fields with $g\approx2$, while valley order responds only to the perpendicular component, so the measured gap slopes in $B_\parallel$ and $B_\perp$ identify each insulator's isospin flavor. For the fractional states, the relevant quantity is the ratio of magnetic flux through the charge-density-wave unit cell to flux through the moiré unit cell, which gives a predicted slope ratio of $3:2$ between the $\nu=1/3$ (or $2/3$) and $\nu=1/2$ states, matching the measured phase-boundary slopes.

What would settle it

Compute the bulk and edge contributions to the orbital magnetization $M$ of the rhombohedral hexalayer graphene/hBN moiré band at $\nu=1$: if $M$ does not change sign between the hole and electron sides of the gap, the proposed mechanism for a doping-switchable Chern number is ruled out. On the experimental side, a direct test is to check the $\nu=2$ gap evolution in a tilted field with the perpendicular component held fixed: a spin-polarized state should respond only to the in-plane component, while a valley-polarized state should not respond to the in-plane component at all.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the displacement-field side where electrons are pushed away from the moiré superlattice, the paper finds that the $\nu=1$ correlated insulator in its $0.51^\circ$ device hosts an anomalous Hall effect with Chern number $C=-1$ when the filling is slightly hole-doped and $C=+1$ when slightly electron-doped, with the two states following the Streda formula in a Landau fan. The sign switch is explained as a doping-controlled reversal of the total magnetization $M$: an orbital Chern insulator has both bulk and edge contributions to $M$, and when the edge contribution dominates, $M$ changes sign across the gap, making both Chern numbers robust. At $\nu=2$ the same device shows two zero-field insulators whose gaps evolve with magnetic field with effective $g$-factors of roughly $-2$ and $+2$, identifying them as spin-antiferromagnetic and spin-polarized insulators, while a third state that emerges at higher displacement field has a $g$-factor near $9$ and is identified as a valley-polarized insulator because valley order responds only to the perpendicular field. In the second, larger-twist device, insulating states at $\nu=1/3$ and $2/3$ appear at zero field; their positions shift linearly with perpendicular field at a rate consistent with the ratio of magnetic flux through a charge-density-wave unit cell to flux through the moiré cell, and a $\nu=1/2$ stripe phase appears above about $5$ T.

Load-bearing premise

The classification of the three insulators at two electrons per moiré cell assumes that magnetic fields shift their transport gaps only through the Zeeman energy of a single spin or valley flavor, with spin responding to both field directions and valley responding only to the perpendicular field, so if orbital or band-structure effects from the field also shift the gaps, the inferred spin and valley orders would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single device can be toggled between Chern numbers $C=-1$ and $C=+1$ purely by shifting the gate voltage, providing an electrical switch for orbital topology.
  • At $\nu=2$, the isospin ground state can be cycled through antiferromagnetic, spin-polarized, and valley-polarized orders using the displacement field and magnetic field as independent knobs.
  • Zero-field correlated insulators at $\nu=1/3$ and $2/3$ with distinct spin textures, plus a field-induced $\nu=1/2$ stripe phase, show that fractional charge order coexists with isospin order in the same moiré flat bands.
  • Any theory of rhombohedral multilayer graphene moiré bands must reproduce a doping-reversible Chern number at $\nu=1$ and the $g$-factor hierarchy of roughly $-2$, $+2$, and $9$ at $\nu=2$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • By extension, the same bulk-versus-edge magnetization competition should be present in other rhombohedral multilayer graphene/hBN moiré systems, making a doping-switchable Chern number a plausible generic feature of orbital Chern insulators with flat bands, though the paper demonstrates it only in hexalayer devices.
  • A testable consequence not pursued in the paper is that the valley-polarized insulator with $g\approx9$ should show a correspondingly large valley susceptibility in complementary probes such as circular dichroism or capacitance spectroscopy.
  • The linear field shift of the charge-density-wave states implies their real-space superlattice unit cells should be imageable by scanning probes, and the measured slopes predict the supercell area ratio of two versus three moiré cells, providing a direct microscopic check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports low-temperature transport measurements on two rhombohedral hexalayer graphene/hBN moiré devices. In device I (θ=0.51°), the authors identify at filling v=1 a Chern insulator whose Chern number appears to reverse with doping (C=-1 on the hole side, C=+1 on the electron side) at BꞱ=1 T, and they attribute the reversal to a sign change of the total orbital magnetization across the gap (Refs 31, 32). At v=2 they observe three insulating states, labeled spin-antiferromagnetic, spin-polarized, and valley-polarized based on the linear-in-B evolution of their transport gaps under in-plane and out-of-plane magnetic fields. In device II (θ=1.29°), they report charge-density-wave insulators at v=1/3 and 2/3 at zero field, a field-induced stripe phase at v=1/2, and they estimate CDW unit-cell areas from the field dependence of the phase boundaries.

Significance. If correct, the doping-controlled reversal of the Chern number at v=1 would be a notable demonstration of the orbital-magnetization switching scenario in a rhombohedral graphene moiré system, and the v=2 isospin phase map would provide a useful benchmark for competing orders in multilayer rhombohedral graphene. The paper has real strengths: two complementary devices, a direct comparison with a moiré-free r-6LG sample, Streda-slope analysis in the Landau fan that supports the Chern assignments at finite field, and an internally consistent slope-ratio argument for the CDW phases. The manuscript is, however, a purely experimental report whose central claims are interpretive, and the switching claim in particular rests on evidence that is partly inconsistent at zero field (see major comments). The v=2 classification and the CDW observations are independent of that claim and retain value regardless of how the v=1 issue is resolved.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2e-f and the 'Switchable Chern insulator' paragraph] The claim that the Chern number at v=1 is reversed by doping is not supported at zero magnetic field. The text itself states that on the electron-doped side "an anomalous Hall signal with same sign is detected near zero magnetic field (Fig. 2f)", with the reversal to +h/e² developing only by BꞱ = 2.5 T. The zero-field loops therefore show the same Chern sign on both doping sides, which is what one expects if C=-1 persists on both sides at zero field. This contradicts a purely doping-controlled switch and also contradicts the proposed mechanism, since a sign change of M across the gap would produce opposite Hall signs at zero field. The opposite Streda slopes in Fig. 2c-d do establish opposite Chern numbers at finite field, but the headline "switchable Chern insulator" and the mechanism paragraph must be reconciled with the zero-field data. The authors should either demonstrate opposite remanent Hall signs after field poling on the two doping sides, or explicitly reframe the result as a doping-dependent field-stabilized transition and revise the title/abstract accordingly.
  2. [Fig. 2e and Methods S4] The hole-side state is assigned C=-1 from a zero-field Hall resistance of about 15 kΩ, well below the quantized value h/e² ≈ 25.8 kΩ, and the assignment therefore relies on the sign alone. Because Figs. 2e-f are raw, unprocessed data (Methods S4 states that only Fig. 2c-d and Extended Data Fig. 5 were symmetrized/anti-symmetrized), contact misalignment mixing Rxx and Rxy could contribute sizeably to the zero-field signal. Please provide the anti-symmetrized Hall loops for both doping sides and state what mechanism accounts for the ~40% shortfall relative to h/e² (partial gap occupancy, series resistance, or mixing).
  3. [Fig. 3d and the 'Isospin competitions' paragraph] The identification of insulators I, II, and III as antiferromagnetic, spin-polarized, and valley-polarized assumes that the entire magnetic-field dependence of the transport gap is the Zeeman energy g μ_B B of a single isospin flavor. Orbital coupling of BꞱ to the moiré bands, Landau-level formation, and field-induced changes of the Hartree-Fock order parameter can all shift a measured activation gap linearly or nonlinearly in B, in which case the extracted g-factors (≈ -2, +2, +9) would be effective values rather than isospin Zeeman constants. In particular, insulator III is characterized only against BꞱ in Fig. 3d; no in-plane-field gap evolution is reported for this phase, so the large g=9 does not by itself isolate valley order. Please report the B|| response of insulator III or provide an explicit argument separating Zeeman and orbital contributions.
  4. [Fig. 4e and the CDW field-shift discussion] The flux-ratio argument requires the CDW unit-cell areas, but the assignments are not derived and are stated in a confusing way: the text says that for v=1/3 (2/3) the area A is twice the moiré unit cell and for v=1/2 it is three times, whereas commensurability at v=1/3 (one electron per three moiré cells) would naturally suggest a three-moiré-cell CDW unit cell. In addition, the comparison ratio of the fitted slopes, 0.02:0.014 = 1.43, is asserted to agree with 3:2 = 1.5 without a tolerance; error bars on the slopes are needed to substantiate this claimed agreement.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract uses "r-6G/hBN" while the main text uses "r-6LG/hBN"; please unify the notation.
  2. [Materials and Methods] The Methods sections are numbered S1, S2, S4; section S3 is missing from the submitted manuscript.
  3. [Extended Data] The text cites 'Extended Data Fig. 5' for the measurements at D = 0.62 V/nm and D = 0.70 V/nm, but this figure is not included in the submitted material.
  4. [References] Reference 27 is incomplete: it gives only a title and no journal, volume, or preprint identifier; please complete all references before resubmission.
  5. [Fig. 3d] The g-factors are described as 'estimated', but the fit ranges, the number of data points, and the uncertainty on each g-factor are not given; please specify them so that the linearity claim can be assessed.
  6. [Methods S4] The symmetrization section refers to contacts 1-4 on one side of the channel and contact 5 on the opposite side, but the contact geometry is not defined until Fig. S2; please clarify the contact layout in the text itself.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the v=1 Chern-sign observations, the v=2 gap responses, and the fractional-filling CDW peaks are all directly measured, and the load-bearing interpretations use external theory and model assumptions rather than fitted parameters renamed as predictions.

full rationale

The central transport claims—the v=1 Chern-insulator signatures with opposite Hall signs on the two doping sides at finite field, the three v=2 insulating regions distinguished by their B-perpendicular and B-parallel gap evolution, and the fractional-filling CDW/stripe states—are reported directly from measured Rxx and Rxy data, Landau fans, and temperature-activated gaps. The sign-reversal mechanism is attributed to the external theory of Zhu, Su, and MacDonald (Ref. 31) and the experimental work of Polshyn et al. (Ref. 32), not to a parameter fitted in this paper; those references are independent of the present authors and are externally falsifiable. The v=2 isospin labels (AFI, SPI, VPI) are inferences from measured Zeeman-like gap slopes (g ≈ -2, +2, 9) combined with the different responses of spin and valley to parallel versus perpendicular fields; the labels are physical interpretations, not definitions of the fitted slopes, so no equation reduces to its own input. Background self-citations (e.g., Refs. 18 and 23) are not load-bearing. The skeptic's observation that the zero-field anomalous Hall has the same sign on both doping sides is a legitimate data-interpretation concern about whether the switch is field-driven, but it is not a circularity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no self-citation chain forces the claimed result.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the Zeeman-response assumption for isospin identification and on published predictions for the Chern insulator at v=1; the g-factors and activation gaps used for phase labels are fitted to the measured data.

free parameters (9)
  • g_I = -2
    Extracted from the linear decrease of the transport gap of insulator I with in-plane magnetic field; used to label it an antiferromagnetic insulator.
  • g_II = 2
    Extracted from the linear increase of the gap of insulator II with in-plane field; used to label it a spin-polarized insulator.
  • g_III = 9
    Extracted from the gap increase with out-of-plane field for insulator III; used to label it a valley-polarized insulator.
  • Delta_I = 2.9 meV
    Transport activation gap of insulator I at D=0.14 V/nm; used for phase characterization.
  • Delta_II = 0.88 meV
    Transport activation gap of insulator II at D=0.48 V/nm.
  • Delta_CDW_1/3 = 0.85 meV
    Transport activation gap of the 1/3 CDW state.
  • Delta_CDW_2/3 = 0.57 meV
    Transport activation gap of the 2/3 CDW state.
  • Slope of CDW states vs B_perp = 0.02 V/(nm*T)
    Linear shift of the 1/3 and 2/3 states in D vs B_perp; used to infer real-space unit cell area.
  • Slope of 1/2 stripe vs B_perp = 0.014 V/(nm*T)
    Linear shift of the 1/2 stripe state; used to compare flux ratio with CDW states.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Valley order responds only to out-of-plane magnetic field, while spin responds to both in-plane and out-of-plane fields.
    Used in Fig. 3b,c text to distinguish isospin flavors in the three v=2 insulators. This is a standard single-particle Zeeman assumption applied to correlated gaps.
  • ad hoc to paper The transport gap shift with magnetic field equals the Zeeman energy of the polarized isospin flavor.
    Used to extract g-factors from linear fits in Fig. 3d; this linear Zeeman gap model is not independently derived for these correlated insulators.
  • domain assumption The Chern insulator at v=1 in r-6LG/hBN is predicted to have C=1 from the band calculations of refs 33-35.
    The paper uses this prediction to frame the observed C=+1 state as expected and the C=-1 state as a switching phenomenon.
  • domain assumption Total magnetization M of an orbital Chern insulator is the sum of bulk and edge contributions, and its sign can change across the gap (Ref 31).
    Used to explain the doping-induced Chern number reversal (Extended Data Fig. 6).
  • domain assumption The moiré potential strength is weaker on the +D side than on the -D side because electrons are polarized away from the bottom hBN.
    Used to explain the asymmetry in resistance peaks and phase boundaries between +D and -D (Fig. 1).
  • standard math Data symmetrization and anti-symmetrization using R12,34 and R12,45 removes longitudinal-transverse mixing.
    Methods section S4; standard procedure for multi-terminal Hall bars.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Switchable Chern insulator, isospin competitions and charge density waves in rhombohedral graphene moire superlattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BO5A4NUX

@misc{pith2026241209985,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Switchable Chern insulator, isospin competitions and charge density waves in rhombohedral graphene moire superlattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BO5A4NUX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09985}
}
read the original abstract

Graphene-based moire superlattices provide a versatile platform for exploring novel correlated and topological electronic states, driven by enhanced Coulomb interactions within flat bands. The intrinsic tunability of graphene s multiple degrees of freedom enables precise control over these complex quantum phases. In this study, we observe a range of competing phases and their transitions in rhombohedrally stacked hexalayer graphene on hexagonal boron nitride (r-6G/hBN) moire superlattices. When electrons are polarized away from the moire superlattice, we firstly identify a Chern insulator with reversible Chern numbers at v = 1 (one electron per moire cell), attributed to the competition between bulk and edge magnetizations.Then, we detect transitions between three distinct insulating states at v = 2, driven by vertical displacement field D and vertical magnetic field B. These insulating phases are distinguished as spin-antiferromagnetic, spin-polarized, and valley-polarized insulators, based on their responses to parallel and perpendicular magnetic fields. When electrons are polarized toward the moire superlattice, in a device with large twist angle, insulating states appear at v = 1/3 and 2/3 at zero magnetic field, and v = 1/2 in a magnetic field. Our findings reveal a rich interplay of charge, isospin, topology and magnetic field in rhombohedral graphene moire superlattices.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Correlated states in charge-transfer heterostructures based on rhombohedral multilayer graphene

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A self-consistent screening theory models gate-tunable graphene-insulator heterostructures and predicts Wigner-crystal superlattice-induced Chern insulators and interlayer excitonic insulators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Paschen, S. & Si, Q. Quantum phases driven by strong correlations. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 9–26 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Nuckolls, K. P. & Yazdani, A. A microscopic perspective on moiré materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 9, 460–480 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    Li, T. et al. Quantum anomalous Hall effect from intertwined moiré bands. Nature 600, 641–646 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    & MacDonald, A

    Bistritzer, R. & MacDonald, A. H. Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 12233–12237 (2011)

    2011

  5. [5]

    Cao, Y. et al. Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 80–84 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Cao, Y. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in magic -angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 43–50 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Cao, Y. et al. Tunable correlated states and spin -polarized phases in twisted bilayer–bilayer graphene. Nature 583, 215–220 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Chen, G. et al. Evidence of a gate -tunable Mott insulator in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice. Nat. Phys. 15, 237–241 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Regan, E. C. et al. Mott and generalized Wigner crystal states in WSe2/WS2 moiré superlattices. Nature 579, 359–363 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Electronic Structure of ABC-stacked Multilayer Graphene and Trigonal Warping:A First Principles Calculation

    Yelgel, C. Electronic Structure of ABC-stacked Multilayer Graphene and Trigonal Warping:A First Principles Calculation. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 707, 012022 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    & McCann, E

    Koshino, M. & McCann, E. Trigonal warping and Berry’s phase N π in ABC - stacked multilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 80, 165409 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    & MacDonald, A

    Min, H. & MacDonald, A. H. Electronic Structure of Multilayer Graphene. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 176, 227–252 (2008)

    2008

  5. [13]

    Zhou, H. et al. Isospin magnetism and spin-polarized superconductivity in Bernal bilayer graphene. Science 375, 774–778 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    & Young, A

    Zhou, H., Xie, T., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K. & Young, A. F. Superconductivity in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nature 598, 434–438 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Han, T. et al. Orbital multiferroicity in pentalayer rhombohedral graphene. Nature 623, 41–47 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Zhou, H. et al. Half- and quarter-metals in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nature 598, 429–433 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Han, T. et al. Correlated insulator and Chern insulators in pentalayer rhombohedral-stacked graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19. 181-187 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Liu, K. et al. Spontaneous broken -symmetry insulator and metals in tetralayer rhombohedral graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 188–195 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    T., Allen, M

    Weitz, R. T., Allen, M. T., Feldman, B. E., Martin, J. & Yacoby, A. Broken - Symmetry States in Doubly Gated Suspended Bilayer Graphene. Science 330, 812–816 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    E., Martin, J

    Feldman, B. E., Martin, J. & Yacoby, A. Broken -symmetry states and dive rgent resistance in suspended bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 5, 889–893 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    Velasco, J. et al. Transport spectroscopy of symmetry -broken insulating states in bilayer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 156–160 (2012)

    2012

  14. [22]

    Geisenhof, F. R. et al. Quantum anomalous Hall octet driven by orbital magnetism in bilayer graphene. Nature 598, 53–58 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Sha, Y. et al. Observation of a Chern insulator in crystalline ABCA -tetralayer graphene with spin-orbit coupling. Science 384, 414–419 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Han, T. et al. Large quantum anomalous Hall effect in spin -orbit proximitized rhombohedral graphene. Science 384, 647–651 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Park, Y., Kim, Y., Chittari, B. L. & Jung, J. Topological flat bands in rhombohedral tetralayer and multilayer graphene on hexagonal boron nitride moiré superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 108, 155406 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    L., Chen, G., Zhang, Y., Wang, F

    Chittari, B. L., Chen, G., Zhang, Y., Wang, F. & Jung, J. Gate-Tunable Topological Flat Bands in Trilayer Graphene Boron -Nitride Moiré Superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 016401 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Xie, J. et al. Even- and Odd-denominator Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in Graphene Moiré Superlattices

  20. [28]

    Chen, G. et al. Magnetic Field -Stabilized Wigner Crystal States in a Graphene Moiré Superlattice. Nano Lett. 23, 7023–7028 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Lu, Z. et al. Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene. Nature 626, 759–764 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Chen, G. et al. Tunable correlated Chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moiré superlattice. Nature 579, 56–61 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    & MacDonald, A

    Zhu, J., S u, J.-J. & MacDonald, A. H. Voltage -Controlled Magnetic Reversal in Orbital Chern Insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 227702 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Polshyn, H. et al. Electrical switching of magnetic order in an orbital Chern insulator. Nature 588, 66–70 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    & Zhang, Y.-H

    Zhou, B., Yang, H. & Zhang, Y.-H. Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effects in rhombohedral multilayer graphene in the moireless limit and in Coulomb imprinted superlattice. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04217 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Dong, J. et al. Anomalous Hall Crystals in Rhombohedral Multilayer Graphene I: Interaction-Driven Chern Bands and Fractional Quantum Hall States at Zero Magnetic Field. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05568 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Dong, Z., Patri, A. S. & Senthil, T. Theory of fractional quantum anomalous Hall phases in pentalayer rhombohedral graphene moir é structures. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03445 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Hunt, B. et al. Massive Dirac Fermions and Hofstadter Butterfly in a van der Waals Heterostructure. Science 340, 1427–1430 (2013). Materials and Methods S1. Device fabrications Graphene, WS₂, graphite, and hBN were mechanically exfoliated onto SiO₂ (285 nm)/Si substrates. The ...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.