Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Three-dimensional tearing instability of flux-tube-like magnetic fields

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that a flux-tube-like magnetic field supports a tearing-like instability in 3D without a guide field, with growth rates reduced from the 2D value by the factor $\int g(y)^{1/2}\,dy/\int dy$.

desk verdict The paper's central prefactor is missing a 4/5 power; the numerics are likely fine but the headline analytic claim is wrong as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10065 v2 pith:6XZ5ADTK submitted 2024-12-13 physics.plasm-ph astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

Vinay Kumar , Pallavi Bhat This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR PACS 52.35.Py
keywords magneticreconnectiontearinginstabilitythree-dimensionalMHDflux-tube-likefieldslinearstabilityresistivemodeLundquistnumberscalingguide-field-free
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the classical tearing instability survives when a reversing magnetic field is shaped into a flux tube rather than an infinite planar sheet. It studies the equilibrium $\mathbf{B}_0 = B_0 f(x)g(y)\hat{z}$ with $f(x)=2.6\tanh(x)\,\mathrm{sech}^2(x)$ and a smooth modulation $g(y)=\mathrm{sech}^2(y/\lambda)$, so the field reverses across $x$ and decays in $y$, mimicking anti-parallel flux tubes. The central claim is that a tearing-like mode still grows in this genuinely three-dimensional configuration even when no guide field is present, and that its linear growth rate is the 2D rate multiplied by the single factor $\int g(y)^{1/2}\,dy/\int dy$. Because the dispersion-relation shape and the $S^{-1/2}$ Lundquist-number scaling survive, the paper argues that three-dimensionality slows reconnection without changing its qualitative character. Astrophysical reconnection often happens in 3D flux-tube geometries without guide fields, and this analysis offers a concrete, testable prediction for how the growth rate is reduced there.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the variable-separable equilibrium $\mathbf{B}_0=B_0 f(x)g(y)\hat{z}$ with $g(y)=\mathrm{sech}^2(y/\lambda)$, which converts a 2D Harris-type sheet into a flux-tube-like configuration. The analysis proceeds by treating $g(y)$ as a slow modulation: the inner resistive layer has a local width $\delta(y)\propto g(y)^{-1/2}$, while the instability parameter $\Delta'(x,y)$ is taken to be nearly uniform along $y$. Integrating the inner-region matching equation over $y$ turns the modulation into the overall prefactor $\int g(y)^{1/2}\,dy/\int dy$, which is the mechanism by which three-dimensionality slows the mode without changing the dispersion-relation shape.

What would settle it

Fix a wavenumber and resistivity, set $g(y)=\mathrm{sech}^2(y/\lambda)$, and compute $\gamma_{3D}/\gamma_{2D}$ from the linear eigenvalue problem while decreasing the modulation width $\lambda$ from large values down to the shear length $a$. The paper's claim predicts the ratio follows $\int g(y)^{1/2}\,dy/\int dy$ throughout the slow-modulation regime; the first measurable departure from that prediction as $\lambda$ approaches $a$ locates the breakdown, and a departure while $\lambda$ is still much larger than $a$ would disprove the prefactor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the modulation function $g(y)$ enters the linear tearing dispersion relation only through the integral $\int g(y)^{1/2}\,dy$. Starting from the standard inner/outer boundary-layer matching, the width of the resistive layer becomes $y$-dependent, $\delta(y)\propto [\eta\gamma/(kB_0 g(y))]^{1/4}$, and after integrating the matching condition over $y$ the growth rate obeys $\gamma_{3D}=\gamma_{2D}\times \int g(y)^{1/2}\,dy/\int dy$, provided the shape integral of the inner solution is nearly independent of $y$. The paper confirms this by solving the full linearized eigenvalue problem and by direct numerical simulations: measured 3D growth rates sit below the 2D curve, the ratio follows the predicted $\lambda$-dependent factor, rescaled dispersion curves collapse onto the 2D result, and the fastest-growing rate scales as $S^{-1/2}$. The mode has no guide field, and the reconnection proceeds plane-by-plane at 2D-like X-points, with magnetic islands bent in the $y$-direction because the perturbed field develops a non-zero $y$-component.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the modulation is gentle: variations along the third direction must be slow compared with variations across the sheet, so that $\partial_y^2$ can be neglected next to $\partial_x^2$ and the instability parameter $\Delta'$ stays nearly the same at every y-slice; if the flux tube is too narrow or too sharply modulated, the simple $\int g(y)^{1/2}\,dy/\int dy$ factor is not guaranteed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A tearing-like mode exists in a reversing flux-tube equilibrium with no guide field, so 2D-like reconnection is not confined to strongly guide-field-dominated plasmas.
  • The 3D growth rate equals the 2D rate times $\int g(y)^{1/2}\,dy/\int dy$, giving a direct measurable signature of the modulation width $\lambda$.
  • The dispersion relation and the $S^{-1/2}$ scaling of the maximum growth rate are unchanged in shape, so three-dimensionality changes the rate but not the qualitative reconnection scaling.
  • The $y$-dependent resistive layer width makes the reconnection structure genuinely 3D, with bent magnetic islands and an oblong current-density region near the reconnection site.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if the same prefactor carries into the nonlinear regime, plasmoid formation in flux-tube-like sheets should be delayed relative to 2D at equal Lundquist number; a direct simulation comparing plasmoid onset times would test this extension.
  • Inference: the slow-modulation ordering implies a breakdown scale, namely that once $\lambda$ approaches the shear length $a$, the $\partial_y^2\ll\partial_x^2$ approximation and the y-uniformity of $\Delta'$ should fail, so mapping $\gamma_{3D}/\gamma_{2D}$ versus $\lambda$ would show where the integral factor ceases to be accurate.
  • Inference: because the derivation only uses the y-dependence of the inner-layer width, the same reduction factor may apply to other tearing-like modes in variable-separable equilibria, not only to the particular $f(x)=\tanh(x)\,\mathrm{sech}^2(x)$ profile studied here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a three-dimensional tearing instability in a pressure-balanced equilibrium B = B0 f(x) g(y) z-hat, with f(x) = 2.6 tanh(x) sech^2(x) and g(y) = sech^2(y/lambda). It extends the classic FKR inner-layer analysis to this modulated configuration, derives a dispersion relation, validates it with a spectral eigenvalue solver and with direct numerical simulations using Dedalus, and reports that the 3D growth rate is reduced from the 2D value by the factor integral g(y)^{1/2} dy divided by integral dy, with the same dispersion-relation shape and gamma_max ~ S^{-1/2}. The paper also describes the eigenfunctions, the flux-tube-like island structure, and cross-slice coupling in the nonlinear simulations.

Significance. The paper addresses a relatively unexplored configuration: tearing-like reconnection in 3D anti-parallel flux-tube equilibria without a guide field. Its strengths are the combined analytic, eigenvalue-solver, and DNS approach, including a public code (SPEC-Tear) and a parameter-free prediction whose numerical checks use no fitted constants. The predicted prefactor, if correct, would be a simple and useful design rule for estimating growth-rate suppression in modulated current sheets. However, the analytic prefactor contains an algebraic error that currently invalidates the headline claim. Because the derivation is the load-bearing element, the paper requires major revision even though the numerical infrastructure and the qualitative scaling results are valuable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1 (Eqs. 2.15-2.17), abstract, Section 5] The algebra in solving Eq. (2.16) for gamma is incorrect as written. From Eq. (2.15), Delta' = gamma^{5/4} eta^{-3/4} (kB0)^{-1/2} g(y)^{-1/2} I(y), so Eq. (2.16) gives Delta' integral g^{1/2} dy = gamma^{5/4} eta^{-3/4} (kB0)^{-1/2} integral I(y) dy. Solving for gamma yields gamma = Delta'^{4/5} eta^{3/5} (kB0)^{2/5} [integral g^{1/2} dy / integral I(y) dy]^{4/5}, not the first power stated in Eq. (2.17). This is not a notational quirk: for g = sech^2(y/lambda) in a box of width 4 pi with lambda = 1, the corrected 3D/2D ratio is about (1/4)^{4/5} = 0.33, not 0.25. Because the abstract, Section 5, and the theoretical curves in Figs. 8-9 repeat the first-power form, the central prefactor claim is not established by the written derivation. Please correct Eq. (2.17) and all dependent statements, and state explicitly which form was used to generate Figs. 8 and 9.
  2. [Section 2.1 (text after Eq. 2.17), Appendix 6.1] The slow-modulation ordering is asserted but not quantified. The inner-layer width is delta(y) = (eta gamma)^{1/4} / (B0 k g(y))^{1/2}, so the assumption d_y^2 << d_x^2 used in Eq. (2.9) requires, roughly, lambda >> delta(y) over the relevant y range, but the paper gives no criterion in terms of lambda, k, eta, and S. Appendix 6.1 demonstrates a posteriori that r = d_x^2/d_y^2 > 1 over much of the domain for particular parameters, but this does not delimit the range of validity of Eq. (2.17). The manuscript should either derive a quantitative ordering condition or explicitly state that the prediction is verified only for the parameters tested.
  3. [Section 2.1 (Eqs. 2.14-2.17)] The replacement integral I(y) dy ~ I_2D integral dy is not quantitatively justified. The paper asserts that this holds when the eigenfunction b_x resembles its 2D counterpart, but the comparisons in Figs. 3 and 10 are qualitative and do not establish that the dimensionless inner integral I(y) = integral (1 + X V) dX is independent of y. Since Eq. (2.17) contains integral I(y) dy, and the simple prefactor integral g^{1/2} dy / integral dy follows only after this additional assumption, the authors should compute I(y) from the eigenfunctions, or provide a bound on its variation, before claiming the reduction factor is simply integral g^{1/2} dy / integral dy.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (2.8)] The definition of Delta' has garbled limits; it should read Delta' = [d ln b_x/dx] evaluated from 0_- to 0_+.
  2. [Section 2.2 and Appendix 6.3] Because g(y) is not periodic, the low-pass filtered equilibrium used in the solver and in the DNS is not exactly the physical equilibrium. The 2D validation with an unfiltered finite-difference solver is reassuring, but the paper should state the filter cutoff and, if possible, show convergence with respect to that cutoff for the 3D case.
  3. [Section 5] The statement that Squire's theorem makes the fastest-growing modes identical to their 2D counterparts for a uniform extension should be worded carefully; the theorem concerns hydrodynamic parallel shear flows, and its extension to resistive MHD with a nonuniform equilibrium is not automatic.
  4. [Throughout] There are several typographical issues, including 'equilibirum' in Section 5, 'W ang' in the reference list for Wang et al., and an ambiguous rendering of Eq. (2.8); these should be cleaned up in revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the 3D growth-rate factor is derived from stated ordering assumptions and verified by independent EVP/DNS; the abstract's prefactor has an algebraic exponent issue, which is a correctness concern, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that 3D modulation reduces the tearing growth rate by an integral factor—is derived in Section 2.1 from the stated equilibrium B0 = B0 f(x)g(y) z-hat and standard tearing ordering (inner/outer layer, ∂x² ≫ ∂y², Δ' taken as given from outer region). No simulation output or fitted constant enters Eq. (2.16); the eigenvalue solver in Section 2.2 and the Dedalus DNS in Sections 3–4 are independent checks that use the same equilibrium but solve the full linearized or nonlinear equations. The only self-citation, Ghosh & Bhat (2024), appears in a general introductory sentence about particle acceleration and is not load-bearing. One note, flagged as a correctness rather than circularity matter: Eq. (2.17) as printed does not follow from Eq. (2.16) by algebra; solving Eq. (2.16) for γ gives [∫g^{1/2}dy/∫I dy]^{4/5}, not the first power, so the abstract's 'factor of ∫g^{1/2}dy/∫dy' and the Fig. 8 theoretical line need a 4/5 exponent (or a restatement). Because the EVP and DNS are independent and discriminate the exponent, the derivation chain is not self-referential.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted constants enter the central prefactor prediction; lambda and 2.6 are model or normalization choices. The main axiomatic burden is the slow-modulation and Delta'-homogeneity assumption that makes the inner-layer integration tractable, which the paper checks numerically.

free parameters (2)
  • Modulation width lambda = varied, e.g. lambda=1 in Fig. 2 and additional values in Figs. 7-8
    Sets the y-width of the flux-tube modulation in g(y)=sech^2(y/lambda). It is a model parameter scanned in the simulations, not fitted to the target growth rates.
  • Equilibrium amplitude prefactor 2.6 = 2.6
    Chosen so that max |B|=1 and the Alfven speed is 1. This is a normalization choice, not a parameter fitted to instability data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The plasma is described by the incompressible, inviscid, resistive MHD equations given in Eqs. (2.1) to (2.3).
    This is the governing model for the linear stability analysis and the simulations.
  • domain assumption The initial equilibrium B0=f(x)g(y) zhat is in pressure balance and has no magnetic tension, so B dot grad B = 0.
    Invoked in Section 2 to construct the base state; the dissipation of the equilibrium is neglected in the linearization.
  • domain assumption In the inner resistive layer, d_x^2 dominates both k^2 and d_y^2, allowing those terms to be dropped.
    Used in Eq. (2.9) and Appendix 6.1. The assumption is load-bearing for the local layer width scaling and is checked numerically after the derivation.
  • ad hoc to paper The instability parameter Delta'(x,y) is nearly homogeneous along y and the integral I(y) is unaffected by the modulation.
    Adopted in Section 2.1 to close the analytical derivation and to replace the denominator in Eq. (2.17) by a simple average. The paper acknowledges this is valid only for a smooth modulation.
  • standard math A normal-mode ansatz with wavenumber k along z and standard outer-region matching through Delta' can be carried over from the 2D tearing problem.
    This is the standard FKR tearing-mode framework cited from Goldston and Rutherford (1995), applied here to the variable-separable 3D equilibrium.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Three-dimensional tearing instability of flux-tube-like magnetic fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6XZ5ADTK

@misc{pith2026241210065,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Three-dimensional tearing instability of flux-tube-like magnetic fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6XZ5ADTK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10065}
}
abstract

Magnetic reconnection, a fundamental plasma process, is pivotal in understanding energy conversion and particle acceleration in astrophysical systems. While extensively studied in two-dimensional (2D) configurations, the dynamics of reconnection in three-dimensional (3D) systems remain under-explored. In this work, we extend the classical tearing mode instability to 3D by introducing a modulation along the otherwise uniform direction in a 2D equilibrium, given by $g(y)$, mimicking a flux tube-like configuration. We perform linear stability analysis (both analytically and numerically) and direct numerical simulations to investigate the effects of three-dimensionality. Remarkably, we find that a tearing-like instability arises in 3D as well, even without the presence of guide fields. Further, our findings reveal that the 3D tearing instability exhibits reduced growth rates compared to 2D by a factor of $\int g(y)^{1/2} dy~/\int dy$, with the dispersion relation maintaining similar scaling characteristics. We show that the modulation introduces spatially varying resistive layer properties, which influence the reconnection dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10065 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Match between the numerically obtained eigenfunction for the 2D tearing instability using the EVP solver and the expectation from outer region theory [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Equilibrium configuration of the magnetic field given by Eq. (2.18) with λ = 1. The red-blue colours show the z-component of the magnetic field and the region where the associated current density is greater than an arbitrary cutoff (|J| > 2) is depicted in white-green colours. A slice of the unmodulated magnetic field is shown on the floor for comparison with the usual 2D tearing case. Notice that the modulation pro… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Eigenfunctions obtained from the numerical solution of the generalized eigenvalue problem with η = 0.01 and k = 0.7. Since the eigenfunctions can only be calculated up to a scale, these were rescaled to have a spatial maximum of 1. configuration. We choose g(y) = sech2 (y/λ), thus modifying the equilibrium to, B = f(x)g(y) = 2.6 tanh (x) sech2 (x) sech2 (y/λ)zˆ. (2.18) The magnetic field and the current configuratio… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dispersion curves with varying values of the modulation width λ. any given wavenumber, the shape and the asymptotic scaling of the dispersion relation is similar in both cases. We validate these findings by performing direct numerical simulations in Section 3, and also…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Streamlines of the magnetic field. The left figure shows the initial configuration and the flux-tube like structure is clearly visible. The structure at a later time is shown on the right. The colour represents the magnitude of the magnetic field. Runge-Kutta scheme. C…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Growth of perturbations in the 2D case (left) and the 3D case (right). The plot shows the linear growth of the energy in the unstable mode, Ek∗ , vs time (given in code units). The inset shows the evolution of the local slope, depicting a clean linear growth phase wher…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Dispersion relation in the 3D case with variation in the width of the modulation, λ. As before, the dashed lines show the asymptotic theoretical growth rates in the FKR and the Coppi regimes, and the points are the measured growth rates. The 2D dispersion relation with…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Effect of the modulation width λ on the growth rate. The plot on the top shows the ratio of the growth rate in 3D to that in 2D (or λ = ∞), γ3D/γ2D vs. the modulation width λ, for a fixed wavenumber k ∗ = 0.7. The blue crosses are measurements from the simulations and …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Collapse of the measured dispersion relation (from both the DNSs and the EVP) on top of the 2D dispersion curve when the corresponding growth rates are rescaled by the exact λ dependent prefactor predicted in Eq. (2.17) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of the eigenfunctions obtained from the linear theory and the fully non-linear simulations. The eigenfunctions are shown for the same parameters, η = 0.01 and k = 0.7. The left plot shows the x-component of the perturbed magnetic field, bx, and the plot on …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Scaling of the maximum growth rate with the Lundquist number S. The maximum growth rate was obtained by interpolating the individual dispersion relations. The solid line, which shows the S −1/2 scaling, is in good agreement with the data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Growth of perturbations in different y-slices. The plot shows the maximum b 2 x across y-slices vs time. The growth rate is the same as that obtained from the spectral energy, indicating cross coupling between the slices. clear three-dimensional structure to these lin…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Magnetic field streamlines at two different times. Left: Initial state. Right: State at a later time in the linear growth stage. The volume rendering shows the current density and magnetic field lines are shown in pink (in the y = 0 plane) and in cyan (off center plan…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Ratio of the absolute values of the double derivatives  r = ∂ 2 x ∂ 2 y  of bx (left plot) and by (right plot), clipped at r = 4 to avoid extreme dynamical range [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Magnetic field lines in the full 3D case. The colours show the y-component of the magnetic field. on the RHS of Eqs. (2.4) - (2.7), and give these as output after flattening it back to a 4 × Nx × Ny shape. The same is done for the LHS of Eqs. (2.4) - (2.7), without th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year eprint label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    , Yang, E

    Ansel, J. , Yang, E. , He, H. , Gimelshein, N. , Jain, A. , Voznesensky, M. , Bao, B. , Bell, P. , Berard, D. , Burovski, E. , Chauhan, G. , Chourdia, A. , Constable, W. , Desmaison, A. , DeVito, Z. , Ellison, E. , Feng, W. , Gong, J. , Gschwind, M. , Hirsh, B. , Huang, S. , Kalambarkar, K. , Kirsch, L. , Lazos, M. , Lezcano, M. , Liang, Y. , Liang, J. , ...

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    , Pariat, E

    Aulanier, G. , Pariat, E. , Démoulin, P. & Devore, C. R. 2006 Slip-running reconnection in quasi-separatrix layers . Solar Physics 238 (2), 347--376

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    , Van Driel-Gesztelyi, L

    Baker, D. , Van Driel-Gesztelyi, L. , Mandrini, C. H. , Démoulin, P. & Murray, M. J. 2009 Magnetic reconnection along quasi-separatrix layers as a driver of ubiquitous active region outflows . The Astrophysical Journal 705 (1), 926--935

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    , Huang, Y.-M

    Bhattacharjee, A. , Huang, Y.-M. , Yang, H. & Rogers, B. 2009 Fast reconnection in high-lundquist-number plasmas due to the plasmoid instability . Physics of Plasmas 16 (11), 112102

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    & Lazarian, A

    Brunetti, G. & Lazarian, A. 2016 Stochastic reacceleration of relativistic electrons by turbulent reconnection: A mechanism for cluster-scale radio emission? Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 458 (3), 2584--2595

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Burch, J. L. & Phan, T. D. 2016 Magnetic reconnection at the dayside magnetopause: Advances with mms . Geophysical Research Letters 43 (16), 8327--8338

    work page 2016

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Burns, K. J. , Vasil, G. M. , Oishi, J. S. , Lecoanet, D. & Brown, B. P. 2020 Dedalus: A flexible framework for numerical simulations with spectral methods . Physical Review Research 2 (2), 023068

    2020

  2. [10]

    Cassak, P. A. , Shay, M. A. & Drake, J. F. 2009 Scaling of sweet–parker reconnection with secondary islands . Physics of Plasmas 16 (12), 120702

    2009

  3. [11]

    , Philippov, A

    Cerutti, B. , Philippov, A. A. & Spitkovsky, A. 2016 Modelling high-energy pulsar light curves from first principles . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 457 (3), 2401--2414

    2016

  4. [12]

    , Uzdensky, D

    Cerutti, B. , Uzdensky, D. A. & Begelman, M. C. 2012 Extreme particle acceleration in magnetic reconnection layers: Application to the gamma-ray flares in the crab nebula . The Astrophysical Journal 746 (2), 148

    2012

  5. [13]

    , Lingam, M

    Comisso, L. , Lingam, M. , Huang, Y.-M. & Bhattacharjee, A. 2016 General theory of the plasmoid instability . Physics of Plasmas 23 (10), 100702

    2016

  6. [14]

    , Galvao, R

    Coppi, B. , Galvao, R. , Pellat, R. , Rosenbluth, M. & Rutherford, P. 1976 Resistive internal kink modes . Soviet Journal of Plasma Physics 2 , 533--535

    1976

  7. [15]

    & Antiochos, S

    Dahlburg, R. & Antiochos, S. 1997 Magnetic fluxtube reconnection . Advances in Space Research 19 (12), 1781--1784

    1997

  8. [16]

    Dahlburg, R. B. , Antiochos, S. K. & Zang, T. A. 1992 Secondary instability in three-dimensional magnetic reconnection . Physics of Fluids B 4 , 3902--3914

    1992

  9. [17]

    , Papini, E

    Del Zanna, L. , Papini, E. , Landi, S. , Bugli, M. & Bucciantini, N. 2016 Fast reconnection in relativistic plasmas: the magnetohydrodynamics tearing instability revisited . Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (4), 3753--3765 , arXiv:arXiv: https://academic.o...

    2016

  10. [18]

    , Bagala, L

    Démoulin, P. , Bagala, L. G. , Mandrini, C. H. , Henoux, J. C. & Rovira, M. G. 1997 Quasi-separatrix layers in solar flares. ii. observed magnetic configurations. Astronomy and Astrophysics 325 , 305--317

    1997

  11. [19]

    Fielding, D. B. , Ripperda, B. & Philippov, A. A. 2023 Plasmoid instability in the multiphase interstellar medium . The Astrophysical Journal Letters 949 (1), L5

    2023

  12. [20]

    Furth, H. P. , Killeen, J. & Rosenbluth, M. N. 1963 Finite-resistivity instabilities of a sheet pinch . Physics of Fluids 6 , 459--484

    1963

  13. [21]

    & Bhat, P

    Ghosh, S. & Bhat, P. 2024 Magnetic reconnection: An alternative explanation of radio emission in galaxy clusters

    2024

  14. [22]

    & Rutherford, P

    Goldston, R. & Rutherford, P. 1995 Introduction to plasma physics\/ . Taylor & Francis

    1995

  15. [23]

    , Liu, Y.-H

    Guo, F. , Liu, Y.-H. , Daughton, W. & Li, H. 2015 Particle acceleration and plasma dynamics during magnetic reconnection in the magnetically dominated regime . The Astrophysical Journal 806 (2), 167

    2015

  16. [24]

    , Nayak, S

    Kumar, S. , Nayak, S. S. , Prasad, A. & Bhattacharyya, R. 2021 Magnetic reconnections in the presence of three-dimensional magnetic nulls and quasi-separatrix layers . Solar Physics 296 (1), 26

    2021

  17. [25]

    , Londrillo, P

    Landi, S. , Londrillo, P. , Velli, M. & Bettarini, L. 2008 Three-dimensional simulations of compressible tearing instability . Physics of Plasmas 15 , 012302

    2008

  18. [26]

    , Zanna, L

    Landi, S. , Zanna, L. D. , Papini, E. , Pucci, F. & Velli, M. 2015 Resistive magnetohydrodynamics simulations of the ideal tearing mode . The Astrophysical Journal 806 (1), 131

    2015

  19. [27]

    , Eyink, G

    Lazarian, A. , Eyink, G. L. , Jafari, A. , Kowal, G. , Li, H. , Xu, S. & Vishniac, E. T. 2020 3D turbulent reconnection: Theory, tests, and astrophysical implications . Physics of Plasmas 27 (1), 012305

    2020

  20. [28]

    Linton, M. G. , Dahlburg, R. B. & Antiochos, S. K. 2001 Reconnection of twisted flux tubes as a function of contact angle . The Astrophysical Journal 553 (2), 905--921

    2001

  21. [29]

    Linton, M. G. & Priest, E. R. 2003 Three‐dimensional reconnection of untwisted magnetic flux tubes . The Astrophysical Journal 595 (2), 1259--1276

    2003

  22. [30]

    Loureiro, N. F. , Schekochihin, A. A. & Cowley, S. C. 2007 Instability of current sheets and formation of plasmoid chains . Physics of Plasmas 14 (10), 100703

    2007

  23. [31]

    Melander, M. V. & Hussain, F. 1989 Cut-and-connect of two antiparallel vortex tubes - a new cascade mechanism 2 , 30.1.1--30.1.5

    1989

  24. [32]

    , Srivastava, A

    Mondal, S. , Srivastava, A. K. , Mishra, S. K. , Sangal, K. , Kayshap, P. , Guo, Y. , Pontin, D. I. , Uritsky, V. M. , Ofman, L. , Wang, T. & Yuan, D. 2023 Reconnection-generated plasma flows in the quasi-separatrix layer in localized solar corona . The Astrophysical Journal 9...

    2023

  25. [33]

    Oishi, J. S. , Mac Low, M.-M. , Collins, D. C. & Tamura, M. 2015 Self-generated turbulence in magnetic reconnection . The Astrophysical Journal 806 , L12

    2015

  26. [34]

    , Primavera, L

    Onofri, M. , Primavera, L. , Malara, F. & Veltri, P. 2004 Three-dimensional simulations of magnetic reconnection in slab geometry . Physics of Plasmas 11 , 4837--4846

    2004

  27. [35]

    , Landi, S

    Papini, E. , Landi, S. & Zanna, L. D. 2019 Fast magnetic reconnection: Secondary tearing instability and role of the hall term . The Astrophysical Journal 885 (1), 56

    2019

  28. [36]

    Parnell, C. E. , Maclean, R. C. , Haynes, A. L. & Galsgaard, K. 2010 3D magnetic reconnection . Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 6 (S271), 227--238

    2010

  29. [37]

    2011 Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection regimes: A review

    Pontin, D. 2011 Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection regimes: A review . Advances in Space Research 47 (9), 1508--1522

    2011

  30. [38]

    Priest, E. R. & Démoulin, P. 1995 Three‐dimensional magnetic reconnection without null points: 1. basic theory of magnetic flipping . Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics 100 (A12), 23443--23463

    1995

  31. [39]

    & Velli, M

    Pucci, F. & Velli, M. 2013 Reconnection of quasi-singular current sheets: The “ideal” tearing mode . The Astrophysical Journal 780 (2), L19

    2013

  32. [40]

    , Bacchini, F

    Ripperda, B. , Bacchini, F. & Philippov, A. A. 2020 Magnetic reconnection and hot spot formation in black hole accretion disks . The Astrophysical Journal 900 (2), 100

    2020

  33. [41]

    , Xia, C

    Ruan, W. , Xia, C. & Keppens, R. 2020 A fully self-consistent model for solar flares . The Astrophysical Journal 896 (2), 97

    2020

  34. [42]

    , Loureiro, N

    Samtaney, R. , Loureiro, N. F. , Uzdensky, D. A. , Schekochihin, A. A. & Cowley, S. C. 2009 Formation of plasmoid chains in magnetic reconnection . Physical Review Letters 103 (10), 105004

    2009

  35. [43]

    & Magara, T

    Shibata, K. & Magara, T. 2011 Solar flares: Magnetohydrodynamic processes . Living Reviews in Solar Physics 8

    2011

  36. [44]

    & Spitkovsky, A

    Sironi, L. & Spitkovsky, A. 2014 Relativistic reconnection: An efficient source of non-thermal particles . The Astrophysical Journal 783 (1), L21

    2014

  37. [45]

    Squire, H. B. 1933 On the stability for three-dimensional disturbances of viscous fluid flow between parallel walls . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character 142 (847), 621--628

    1933

  38. [46]

    Uzdensky, D. A. , Loureiro, N. F. & Schekochihin, A. A. 2010 Fast magnetic reconnection in the plasmoid-dominated regime . Physical Review Letters 105 (23), 235002

    2010

  39. [47]

    , Gommers, R

    Virtanen, P. , Gommers, R. , Oliphant, T. E. , Haberland, M. , Reddy, T. , Cournapeau, D. , Burovski, E. , Peterson, P. , Weckesser, W. , Bright, J. , van der Walt , S. J. , Brett, M. , Wilson, J. , Millman, K. J. , Mayorov, N. , Nelson, A. R. J. , Jones, E. , Kern, R. , Larso...

    2020

  40. [48]

    , Yokoyama, T

    Wang, S. , Yokoyama, T. & Isobe, H. 2015 Three-dimensional mhd magnetic reconnection simulations with a finite guide field: Proposal of the shock-evoking positive-feedback model . The Astrophysical Journal 811 , 31

    2015

  41. [49]

    Werner, G. R. , Uzdensky, D. A. , Cerutti, B. , Nalewajko, K. & Begelman, M. C. 2016 The extent of power-law energy spectra in collisionless relativistic magnetic reconnection in pair plasmas . The Astrophysical Journal Letters 816 (1), L8

    2016

  42. [50]

    Wilmot-Smith, A. L. & De Moortel, I. 2007 Magnetic reconnection in flux-tubes undergoing spinning footpoint motions . Astronomy & Astrophysics 473 (2), 615--623

    2007

  43. [51]

    Wyper, P. F. & Pontin, D. I. 2014 Non-linear tearing of 3d null point current sheets . Physics of Plasmas 21 (8), 082114

    2014

  44. [52]

    , Pree, S

    Zhang, Y. , Pree, S. & Bellan, P. M. 2023 Generation of laboratory nanoflares from multiple braided plasma loops . Nature Astronomy 7 (6), 655--661

    2023

  45. [53]

    Zweibel, E. G. & Yamada, M. 2009 Magnetic reconnection in astrophysical and laboratory plasmas . Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 47 (1), 291--332

    2009

  46. [54]

    @esa (Ref

    \@ifclassloaded aguplus natbib The aguplus class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later remove the command natbib from the document \@ifclassloaded nlinproc natbib The nlinproc class already includes natbib cod...

  47. [55]

    @stdbsttrue NAT@ctr \@lbibitem[ NAT@ctr ] \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 [ @natanchorstart #2\@extra@b@citeb \@biblabel @num @natanchorend] @ifc...

  48. [56]

    to ``Reconnection has been largely studied in two dimensions. It is thought to manifest in different ways

    @open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifundefined NAT@sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifundefined bib@heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] @ \@biblabel NAT@ctr \@bib...

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.