Radiator Tailoring for Enhanced Performance in InAs-Based Near-Field Thermophotovoltaics

Jacob J. Krich; Mathieu Giroux; Raphael St-Gelais; Sean Molesky

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 29 references

Radiator Tailoring for Enhanced Performance in InAs-Based Near-Field Thermophotovoltaics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that an InAs radiator can nearly triple the spectral efficiency of an InAs near-field thermophotovoltaic cell relative to a conventional silicon radiator, by suppressing subgap thermal emission while keeping useful power…

desk verdict Useful dielectric correction for InAs NFTPV, but the threefold spectral-efficiency claim rests on a temperature-dependent optical model the paper never actually states. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10217 v1 pith:R64H4BI4 submitted 2024-12-13 physics.app-ph

Mathieu Giroux , Sean Molesky , Raphael St-Gelais , Jacob J. Krich This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.app-ph

keywords near-fieldthermophotovoltaicsInAsradiatordielectricfunctionfree-carrierabsorptionionizedimpurityscatteringspectralefficiencywasteheatrecoveryDrudemodel

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Near-field thermophotovoltaics promise high-efficiency waste-heat recovery, but demonstrations lag behind theory, in part because most experiments still radiate from doped silicon, which sends a large subgap heat load to the cell. This paper argues that replacing the silicon radiator with a properly doped and sized indium arsenide radiator suppresses that parasitic subgap transfer, nearly tripling spectral efficiency at small gaps without sacrificing useful power. To reach that conclusion, the authors first correct the standard dielectric model of InAs, showing that the usual Drude term overestimates free-carrier absorption and substituting a model based on ionized impurity scattering. The practical stakes are direct: an all-InAs emitter-cell device could recover waste heat more efficiently and could be grown monolithically.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the revised free-carrier dielectric model for InAs, which replaces the Drude contribution to the permittivity with an ionized impurity scattering formula valid when frequency exceeds the plasma frequency and the Fermi level exceeds thermal energy. Its free-carrier absorption contribution $\varepsilon''_{FC}(\omega)$ is given by a bracket integral with Thomas-Fermi screening included, and the real part is recovered through Kramers-Kronig relations. The model changes predicted absorption enough that the computed spectral efficiency of an InAs radiator rises by up to 22% relative to the Drude prediction. Performance is evaluated with two metrics defined in the paper: useful transferred power $P = \int_{E_g/\hbar}^{\infty} \frac{E_g}{\hbar\omega} Q(\omega)\,d\omega$ and spectral efficiency $\eta = P/\int_0^\infty Q(\omega)\,d\omega$, with the optimization targeting $P\cdot\eta$. The mechanism that carries the InAs advantage is the absence of the slowly decaying subgap surface-polariton resonance that dominates heat transfer from a doped silicon radiator.

What would settle it

Measure the subgap absorption coefficient of n-doped InAs at roughly 2e18 and 4.6e18 $cm^{-3}$ near photon energies of 0.3-0.4 eV; if the absorption is close to the old Drude prediction instead of the revised model's lower value, the predicted threefold spectral-efficiency gain over a silicon radiator would fall.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the radiator, not just the photovoltaic cell, should be made of InAs in an InAs-based near-field thermophotovoltaic system. Using a corrected dielectric model, the authors optimize the InAs radiator's doping and thickness and find that, compared with the best doped-silicon radiator, the InAs radiator achieves nearly a threefold improvement in spectral efficiency at small gaps while the useful power is at most about five percent lower. The origin is spectral: silicon supports a strong below-bandgap surface-polariton resonance around 0.0255 eV that heats the cell uselessly, whereas InAs lacks that parasitic resonance, so the heat flux is concentrated above the 0.35 eV bandgap. The paper also establishes a modeling claim: the Drude model overestimates free-carrier absorption in n-doped InAs, and the proposed ionized impurity scattering model restores agreement with absorption measurements at moderate doping.

Load-bearing premise

The whole comparison rests on the revised free-carrier absorption model being accurate at the optimized radiator doping levels of 2e18 and 4.6e18 $cm^{-3}$, even though the paper reports a residual twofold overestimation at 3.8e18 $cm^{-3}$ near 0.4 eV.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the all-InAs design is correct, experimental near-field thermophotovoltaic platforms can replace doped-silicon radiators with little or no loss of useful power while reducing cell heating from subgap radiation.
The reduced subgap heat load lowers cooling requirements, which matters for practical device packaging and thermal management.
Because InAs is used for both radiator and cell, the two parts could be grown in a single crystal-growth process, simplifying fabrication.
The corrected dielectric model implies that prior theoretical estimates of InAs-based near-field thermophotovoltaic performance that used the Drude model were systematically pessimistic by up to 22% in spectral efficiency.
The reported performance numbers are spectral upper bounds, so a full electrical model would still be needed to predict terminal efficiency.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The corrected dielectric model is a materials-level correction, so the same reduction in predicted free-carrier absorption should affect other InAs-based near-field and mid-infrared photonic devices, not just near-field thermophotovoltaic radiators.
A near-term experiment could test the central claim directly by measuring cell power and temperature rise for an InAs radiator versus a doped-silicon radiator at 30-100 nm gaps around 700 K; the threefold spectral-efficiency gain should show up as less wasted subgap heating.
The all-InAs configuration hints at an integrated device where radiator and cell are grown in one stack, which could remove gap-alignment and interface losses, although this goes beyond what the paper computes.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague, quick take. The paper does two things: it replaces the Drude free-carrier term in the InAs dielectric function with the von Baltz–Escher ionized impurity scattering model, and it uses the corrected model to optimize an InAs radiator against a Si radiator for an InAs NFTPV cell. The first contribution is solid and worth having: the Drude model indeed overestimates free-carrier absorption in InAs, and the revised model matches the old absorption data up to moderate doping much better. The second contribution, a nearly threefold spectral-efficiency gain with a thin InAs radiator, is a nice result but it has a load-bearing soft spot you should check before believing the number.

The problem is temperature. The manuscript says the PV cell is at 300 K and the radiator at 700–1000 K, but it never says how the InAs dielectric function is evaluated for the radiator. InAs has a bandgap temperature coefficient of about 2.8e-4 eV/K, so at 700 K the gap shrinks by roughly 0.17 eV. If the optical constants are taken from the 300 K model, the model will miss subgap emission from the InAs radiator in the 0.18–0.35 eV window. That is exactly the quantity the optimization is supposed to minimize. The Fig. 8 caption labels the radiator absorption coefficient “at 700 K,” but the text never describes a temperature-dependent optical model for InAs. Either they included it and forgot to say how, or they didn’t include it and the quantitative claim may be too optimistic. This is not an internal inconsistency; it is missing support.

A second, lesser caveat: the model is validated below 1e18 cm^-3, while the optimized radiator dopings are 2e18 and 4.6e18. The authors admit a residual factor-of-two overestimation at 3.8e18 near 0.4 eV. That actually runs in your favor: if the true free-carrier absorption is lower, the InAs radiator looks even better, so this is a conservative error. The temperature issue is the one that could cut the other way.

The paper is otherwise well organized, figures are strong, and the code is on GitHub. The spectral efficiency and power are clearly defined as upper bounds. No circularity; no fitted target.

Who should read it: anyone modeling InAs-based NFTPV or designing radiators for narrow-gap cells. The dielectric correction alone is a good reason to engage.

For peer review: send it out. A good referee will ask for a clear statement of the temperature-dependent optical model and, if absent, for a rerun with the proper bandgap narrowing. The qualitative message will likely survive; the threefold factor may not.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript addresses near-field thermophotovoltaic (NFTPV) performance with an InAs PV cell. It first argues, using published absorption data, that the standard Drude free-carrier term overestimates free-carrier absorption in n-type InAs, and replaces it with a model based on ionized-impurity scattering (Eq. 2). Using this dielectric model in a one-dimensional fluctuational-electrodynamics code, the authors optimize the thickness and doping of InAs and Si radiators at 700/1000 K and 30/100 nm gaps, and compare spectral efficiency (Eq. 4) and useful power (Eq. 3). The central result is that a 6.5-μm, 2×10^18 cm^-3 n-InAs radiator achieves a nearly threefold higher spectral efficiency at small gaps than an optimized thin Si radiator, with less than 5–7% power penalty, because the InAs radiator lacks the broad subgap surface-plasmon absorption of doped Si. The paper also provides a GitHub implementation of the dielectric models.

Significance. If the results are correct, the work is significant for the NFTPV community: it identifies a systematic error in a commonly used InAs dielectric model, proposes a practical crystalline radiator with no exotic films, and gives a reproducible open-source tool. The central claim is falsifiable by near-field experiments. The main risk is that the quantitative claim depends on the validity of the new dielectric model in a regime (N_d > 10^18 cm^-3, T = 700–1000 K) that is not covered by the validation data shown.

major comments (3)

[Section 2.1, Eq. (2)] The text defines R as the number of impurities with charge Z·e, but R does not appear in Eq. (2), in the prefactor A, or in γ. As written, the expression has no explicit dependence on the ionized-impurity density, so it is unclear how the model reproduces the doping dependence of the absorption coefficient plotted in Fig. 1a. Please state exactly how R enters the formula (e.g., as a multiplicative factor in A) and verify the printed equation against the source (Ref. 18). This is load-bearing because the optimization in Section 2.2 varies the radiator doping.
[Section 2.1 and Table 1] The revised ionized-impurity model is validated against absorption data at doping levels below about 10^18 cm^-3, with a residual twofold overestimation at N_d = 3.8×10^18 cm^-3 near 0.4 eV (Fig. 1a). The optimized InAs radiators in Table 1 have N_d = 2×10^18 and 4.6×10^18 cm^-3, exactly in the unvalidated or error-prone range. Since the claimed improvement is attributed to reduced subgap heat transfer (Section 2.2.4), which is controlled by the same free-carrier absorption, the threefold spectral-efficiency gain in Fig. 5a and the power ratios in Figs. 4b and 5b would change if the true subgap emissivity differs from the model. Please provide a sensitivity analysis that bounds the effect of this residual error on the reported performance metrics.
[Section 2.2, Figs. 4–6] The manuscript does not state whether the dielectric function of the InAs (or Si) radiator is evaluated at the radiator temperature or at 300 K. The PV cell is explicitly set to 300 K, but the radiators are at 700 and 1000 K. InAs has a large bandgap temperature coefficient (≈2.8×10^-4 eV/K, giving a ≈0.17 eV narrowing at 700 K), and electron-phonon scattering contributes to free-carrier absorption at high temperature. If a 300 K dielectric function is used for the hot radiator, the subgap emissivity that determines Q(ω) below E_g in Eq. (4) is miscalculated, and the comparison in Figs. 4–6 could be substantially altered. Please specify the temperature at which the optical constants are evaluated for each layer, and show a sensitivity test (or apply a temperature-dependent model) to confirm the conclusions.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract, Figs. 3–5] The 'nearly threefold' improvement is obtained for the finite-thickness comparison (Fig. 5a), while the bulk comparison (Fig. 3a) shows a smaller gain; the abstract should qualify the claim as applying to thin-film radiators at small gaps.
[Section 2.2.2] Please specify the search ranges for the Nelder-Mead optimization (doping and thickness bounds) and the number of restarts; the reported designs in Table 1 are only local optima of the chosen starting grid unless stated otherwise.
[Section 2.2.1] The authors note that the back-reflector layer (n+ 1e20) must use the Drude model, which overestimates absorptivity; since this layer absorbs subgap radiation in the PV cell, the paper should state whether this residual error affects the two radiators equally or could bias the spectral-efficiency comparison.
[Appendix A] The functional form of the smooth suppression of the light-hole absorption above 1 eV is not given, so the 'few percent' uncertainty cannot be independently assessed; please provide the suppression function and the resulting change in η.
[Section 2.2.4] The text refers to 'the Kirchoﬀ law'; this should be 'Kirchhoff's law'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the InAs-radiator improvement is obtained from a radiative-transfer calculation with a cell model fixed identically for both radiators and a dielectric model checked against independent absorption data; the acknowledged high-doping error is an accuracy caveat, not an input-output identity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its actual claimed outputs. Section 2.1 chooses the revised ionized-impurity-scattering model (Eq. 2, from Ref. 18) after comparison with independent absorption measurements (Refs. 24-26): 'Based on existing measurements of InAs absorption, we find that the traditional Drude model overestimates free carrier absorption in InAs.' The model is therefore not fitted to the headline figure. Section 2.2.1 fixes the InAs PV cell from Ref. 16 and uses the same cell for both radiators ('consider an InAs PV cell designed specifically for high efficiency NFTPV [16], ... compare the performance ... using a silicon or InAs radiator'); the radiator comparison is a one-dimensional fluctuational-electrodynamics calculation (Ref. 27) with thickness and doping optimized by Nelder-Mead, so P and eta are outputs, not inputs. No quantity is defined in terms of the claimed result, no parameter is fitted to a subset of the predicted data, and no uniqueness or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the conclusion. The one self-citation load is the inherited cell stack from the authors' own Ref. 16; it is used identically for both radiators and is external published work, so it does not reduce the radiator claim to itself. The manuscript itself flags a material accuracy limitation in Section 2.1: 'approximately a twofold overestimation of the free carrier contribution at high doping levels (e.g., Nd = 3.8 x 10^18 cm^-3 near 0.4 eV)', which is pertinent because the optimized radiators in Table 1 are 2e18 and 4.6e18 cm^-3. That is a correctness/robustness caveat about model validation outside its demonstrated range, not a circular step: the prediction is still computed, not assumed. Therefore no significant circularity is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central model relies primarily on externally validated dielectric data and a standard fluctuational electrodynamics framework. No new physical entities are introduced. The main new inputs are the choice of the ionized impurity scattering model, a 1972 external result, and the optimized radiator geometry and doping values, which are listed as free parameters.

free parameters (1)

Optimized radiator thickness and doping = Finite InAs: 6.5 um, 2 x 10^18 cm^-3; Finite Si: 100 um, 1 x 10^20 cm^-3; Bulk InAs: infinite, 4.6 x 10^18 cm^-3
Chosen by Nelder-Mead optimization to maximize average normalized P times eta across four temperature-gap conditions. These are design parameters, not physical constants, and the central claim depends on them.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Ionized impurity scattering model of Ref. 18 is valid for n-InAs NFTPV conditions (EF > kBT and omega > omega_p).
Adopted from von Baltz and Escher 1972 and applied where validity conditions hold; validated against absorption data only up to moderate doping.
domain assumption The Drude model for the real part of free-carrier permittivity and the approximation n'_IB = sqrt(epsilon_inf) introduce less than 1% to 4% error in P and eta.
The authors test this approximation and report underestimates of approximately 1% and 4% in P and spectral efficiency, respectively.
domain assumption The spectral efficiency metrics P and eta (Eqs. 3 and 4), treating all above-gap photons as generating Eg of useful energy, are sufficient to compare radiator designs.
P is an upper limit; real cell losses such as recombination and series resistance are not modeled, so absolute efficiency may differ.
standard math Kirchhoff's law connects absorption coefficient to radiator emission under the isothermal conditions assumed in the simulations.
Invoked in Section 2.2.4 to explain why lower subgap absorption in InAs leads to lower subgap emission.
standard math Fluctuational electrodynamics as implemented in Ref. 27 accurately computes near-field radiative heat flux for these planar multilayer stacks.
The paper relies on the HeatSlabs code from Ref. 27 without re-deriving the framework.
ad hoc to paper The light-hole interband absorption contribution can be smoothly suppressed above 1 eV with only a few percent change in the KK-derived interband refractive index.
This suppression is introduced in Appendix A to make the Kramers-Kronig integral converge; the exact form is not prescribed.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Radiator Tailoring for Enhanced Performance in InAs-Based Near-Field Thermophotovoltaics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R64H4BI4

@misc{pith2026241210217,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Radiator Tailoring for Enhanced Performance in InAs-Based Near-Field Thermophotovoltaics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R64H4BI4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10217}
}

abstract

Near-field thermophotovoltaics (NFTPV) systems have significant potential for waste heat recovery applications, with both high theoretical efficiency and power density, up to 40% and $11 \ \mathrm{W/cm^{2}}$ at 900 K. Yet experimental demonstrations have only achieved up to 14% efficiency and modest power densities (i.e., $0.75 \ \mathrm{W/cm^{2}}$). While experiments have recently started to focus on photovoltaic (PV) cells custom-made for NFTPV, most work still relies on conventional doped silicon radiators. In this work, we design an optimized NFTPV radiator for an indium arsenide-based system and, in the process, investigate models for the permittivity of InAs in the context of NFTPV. Based on existing measurements of InAs absorption, we find that the traditional Drude model overestimates free carrier absorption in InAs. We replace the Drude portion of the InAs dielectric function with a revised model derived from ionized impurity scattering. Using this revised model, we maximize the spectral efficiency and power density of a NFTPV system by optimizing the spectral coupling between a radiator and an InAs PV cell. We find that when the radiator and the PV cell are both made of InAs, a nearly threefold improvement of spectral efficiency is possible compared to a traditional silicon radiator with the same InAs cell. This enhancement reduces subgap thermal transfer while maintaining power output.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.10217 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** (a) InAs absorption coefficient from the dielectric model of Ref. 22 (dashed lines), which combines a Drude-Lorentz model with an interband model (Drude-Lorentz-Interband), compared to data from n-doped InAs (markers). Our revised model, which replaces the Drude model with an ionized impurity scattering model (Imp Scatt-LorentzInterband), significantly improves the agreement with experimental data above and below… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Illustration of the InAs-based NFTPV system for which we design an optimized radiator. The radiative heat flux absorbed by the PV device depends on several factors, including the radiator doping level and thickness, gap, and temperature. Therefore, prior to comparing the performance of the two radiator materials, we must optimize the radiator parameters for various fixed gaps and temperatures. 2.2.2. Optimizatio… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Bulk InAs vs Bulk Si: (a) Spectral efficiency ratio and (b) useful power ratio. For bulk radiators, InAs offers greater spectral efficiency at the expense of a relative reduction in useful power of over 11% at small gaps. InAs radiator, without significantly affecting the above-bandgap heat absorption [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Best-case InAs vs best-case Si, i.e., Finite InAs vs Bulk Si: (a) Spectral efficiency ratio and (b) useful power ratio. An InAs radiator offers greater spectral efficiency and comparable useful power. spatially resolved spectral absorption in the PV cell, clarifying th…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Spectral radiative heat transfer in an InAs-based NFTPV system using an InAs radiator (Finite InAs design, blue) and a Si radiator (Finite Si design, red) at 700 K and a separation of 100 nm. ily influenced by frustrated modes occurring at a parallel wavevector kρ exce…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Spectral-spatial absorption distribution, qabs,ω,∆z, within the InAs cell for a separation of 100 nm and a radiator temperature of 700 K using (a) an InAs radiator (Finite InAs design) and (b) a Si radiator (Finite Si design). results in a significant improvement in sp…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Absorption coefficient of the FSF layer of the InAs PV cell at 300 K (green), compared with the absorption coefficient of an InAs radiator (Finite InAs design, blue) and a Si radiator (Finite Si design, red), both at 700 K. it accurately represents the absorption at mo…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Radiative heat flux, qrad,ω,kρ , per unit angular frequency, ω, and parallel wavevector, kρ, at a 10 nm separation and a radiator temperature of 700 K for (a) an InAs radiator (Finite InAs design) and (b) a Si radiator (Finite Si design). For both materials, the above…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[1]

Forman, I

C. Forman, I. K. Muritala, R. Pardemann, B. Meyer, Estimating the global waste heat potential , Renew- able and Sustainable Energy Reviews 57 (2016) 1568– 1579

work page 2016
[2]

I. A. O. Tedah, F. Maculewicz, D. E. Wolf, R. Schmechel, Thermoelectrics versus thermophoto- voltaics: two approaches to convert heat ﬂuxes into electricity , Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 52 (27) (2019) 275501

work page 2019
[3]

R. He, D. Kraemer, J. Mao, L. Zeng, Q. Jie, Y. Lan, C. Li, J. Shuai, H. S. Kim, Y. Liu, D. Broido, C.-W. Chu, G. Chen, Z. Ren, Achieving high power factor and output power density in p-type half-heuslers nb 1-x ti x fesb , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (48) (2016) 13576–13581

work page 2016
[4]

Datas, R

A. Datas, R. Vaillon, Thermionic-enhanced near-ﬁeld thermophotovoltaics, Nano Energy 61 (2019) 10–17

work page 2019
[5]

Laroche, R

M. Laroche, R. Carminati, J.-J. Greﬀet, Near-ﬁeld thermophotovoltaic energy conversion, Journal of Ap- plied Physics 100 (6) (2006) 063704

work page 2006
[6]

B. Zhao, K. Chen, S. Buddhiraju, G. Bhatt, M. Lip- son, S. Fan, High-performance near-ﬁeld thermopho- tovoltaics for waste heat recovery , Nano Energy 41 (2017) 344 – 350

work page 2017
[7]

Molesky, Z

S. Molesky, Z. Jacob, Ideal near-ﬁeld thermophoto- voltaic cells , Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015) 205435

work page 2015
[8]

O. Ilic, M. Jablan, J. D. Joannopoulos, I. Celanovic, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c,Overcoming the black body limit in plas- monic and graphene near-ﬁeld thermophotovoltaic systems , Opt. Express 20 (S3) (2012) A366–A384

work page 2012

Show all 29 references

[9]

St-Gelais, G

R. St-Gelais, G. R. Bhatt, L. Zhu, S. Fan, M. Lipson, Hot carrier-based near-ﬁeld thermophotovoltaic en- ergy conversion , ACS Nano 11 (3) (2017) 3001–3009

2017
[10]

Fiorino, L

A. Fiorino, L. Zhu, D. Thompson, R. Mitta- pally, P. Reddy, E. Meyhofer, Nanogap near-ﬁeld thermophotovoltaics, Nature nanotechnology 13 (9) (2018) 806—811

2018
[11]

G. R. Bhatt, B. Zhao, S. Roberts, I. Datta, A. Mo- hanty, T. Lin, J.-M. Hartmann, R. St-Gelais, S. Fan, M. Lipson, Integrated near-ﬁeld thermo-photovoltaics for heat recycling , Nature Communications 11 (1) (2020) 2545

2020
[12]

Lucchesi, D

C. Lucchesi, D. Cakiroglu, J.-P. Perez, T. Taliercio, E. Tourni´ e, P.-O. Chapuis, R. Vaillon,Near-ﬁeld ther- mophotovoltaic conversion with high electrical power density and cell eﬃciency above 14% , Nano Letters 21 (11) (2021) 4524–4529

2021
[13]

Mittapally, B

R. Mittapally, B. Lee, L. Zhu, A. Reihani, J. W. Lim, D. Fan, S. R. Forrest, P. Reddy, E. Meyhofer, Near– ﬁeld thermophotovoltaics for eﬃcient heat to electric- ity conversion at high power density , Nature Commu- nications 12 (1) (2021) 4364

2021
[14]

Inoue, T

T. Inoue, T. Koyama, D. D. Kang, K. Ikeda, T. Asano, S. Noda, One-chip near-ﬁeld thermopho- tovoltaic device integrating a thin-ﬁlm thermal emit- ter and photovoltaic cell , Nano Letters 19 (6) (2019) 3948–3952

2019
[15]

M. Alam, D. Cameron, Investigation of annealing ef- fects on sol–gel deposited indium tin oxide thin ﬁlms in diﬀerent atmospheres , Thin Solid Films 420-421 (2002) 76–82, proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Metallurgic Coatings and Thin Films

2002
[16]

G. P. Forcade, C. E. Valdivia, S. Molesky, S. Lu, A. W. Rodriguez, J. J. Krich, R. St-Gelais, K. Hinzer, Eﬃciency-optimized near-ﬁeld thermophotovoltaics using inas and inassbp , Applied Physics Letters 121 (19) (2022) 193903

2022
[17]

Selvidge, R

J. Selvidge, R. M. France, J. Goldsmith, P. Solanki, M. A. Steiner, E. J. Tervo, Large area near-ﬁeld ther- mophotovoltaics for low temperature applications , arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.01295 (2024). 10

2024 arXiv
[18]

von Baltz, W

R. von Baltz, W. Escher, Quantum theory of free car- rier absorption, physica status solidi (b) 51 (2) (1972) 499–507

1972
[19]

B. J. Lee, Z. M. Zhang, E. A. Early, D. P. De- Witt, B. K. Tsai, Modeling radiative properties of silicon with coatings and comparison with reﬂectance measurements , Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer 19 (4) (2005) 558–565

2005
[20]

C. Fu, Z. Zhang, Nanoscale radiation heat transfer for silicon at diﬀerent doping levels , International Jour- nal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49 (9) (2006) 1703– 1718

2006
[21]

S. Basu, B. J. Lee, Z. M. Zhang, Infrared Radiative Properties of Heavily Doped Silicon at Room Temper- ature , Journal of Heat Transfer 132 (2) (2009) 023301

2009
[22]

Milovich, J

D. Milovich, J. Villa, E. Antolin, A. Datas, A. Marti, R. Vaillon, M. Francoeur, Design of an indium ar- senide cell for near-ﬁeld thermophotovoltaic devices , Journal of Photonics for Energy 10 (2) (2020) 025503– 025503

2020
[23]

Giroux, Permittivity, https://github.com/ MatGiroux/Permittivity (2024)

M. Giroux, Permittivity, https://github.com/ MatGiroux/Permittivity (2024)

2024
[24]

J. R. Dixon, J. M. Ellis, Optical properties of n-type indium arsenide in the fundamental absorption edge region , Physical Review 123 (5) (1961) 1560

1961
[25]

J. R. Dixon, in: Proceedings of 5th International Con- ference on Physics of Semiconductors, Prague, 1960, p. 366

1960
[26]

R. M. Culpepper, J. R. Dixon, Free-carrier absorption in n-type indium arsenide , JOSA 58 (1) (1968) 96– 102

1968
[27]

Molesky, heatSlabs, h t t p s : //g i t h u b .c o m/ SeanMolesky/HeatSlabs (2020)

S. Molesky, heatSlabs, h t t p s : //g i t h u b .c o m/ SeanMolesky/HeatSlabs (2020)

2020
[28]

DeSutter, L

J. DeSutter, L. Tang, M. Francoeur, A near-ﬁeld ra- diative heat transfer device , Nature nanotechnology 14 (8) (2019) 751–755

2019
[29]

Anderson, Absorption constant of Pb1-xSnxTe and Hg1-xCdxTe alloys , Infrared Physics 20 (6) (1980) 363–372

W. Anderson, Absorption constant of Pb1-xSnxTe and Hg1-xCdxTe alloys , Infrared Physics 20 (6) (1980) 363–372. 11

1980

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Forman, I

C. Forman, I. K. Muritala, R. Pardemann, B. Meyer, Estimating the global waste heat potential , Renew- able and Sustainable Energy Reviews 57 (2016) 1568– 1579

work page 2016

[2] [2]

I. A. O. Tedah, F. Maculewicz, D. E. Wolf, R. Schmechel, Thermoelectrics versus thermophoto- voltaics: two approaches to convert heat ﬂuxes into electricity , Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 52 (27) (2019) 275501

work page 2019

[3] [3]

R. He, D. Kraemer, J. Mao, L. Zeng, Q. Jie, Y. Lan, C. Li, J. Shuai, H. S. Kim, Y. Liu, D. Broido, C.-W. Chu, G. Chen, Z. Ren, Achieving high power factor and output power density in p-type half-heuslers nb 1-x ti x fesb , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (48) (2016) 13576–13581

work page 2016

[4] [4]

Datas, R

A. Datas, R. Vaillon, Thermionic-enhanced near-ﬁeld thermophotovoltaics, Nano Energy 61 (2019) 10–17

work page 2019

[5] [5]

Laroche, R

M. Laroche, R. Carminati, J.-J. Greﬀet, Near-ﬁeld thermophotovoltaic energy conversion, Journal of Ap- plied Physics 100 (6) (2006) 063704

work page 2006

[6] [6]

B. Zhao, K. Chen, S. Buddhiraju, G. Bhatt, M. Lip- son, S. Fan, High-performance near-ﬁeld thermopho- tovoltaics for waste heat recovery , Nano Energy 41 (2017) 344 – 350

work page 2017

[7] [7]

Molesky, Z

S. Molesky, Z. Jacob, Ideal near-ﬁeld thermophoto- voltaic cells , Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015) 205435

work page 2015

[8] [8]

O. Ilic, M. Jablan, J. D. Joannopoulos, I. Celanovic, M. Soljaˇ ci´ c,Overcoming the black body limit in plas- monic and graphene near-ﬁeld thermophotovoltaic systems , Opt. Express 20 (S3) (2012) A366–A384

work page 2012