DeepWiener: Neural Networks for CMB polarization maps and power spectrum computation

Bel\'en Costanza; Claudia G. Sc\'occola; Mat\'ias Zaldarriaga

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

DeepWiener: Neural Networks for CMB polarization maps and power spectrum computation

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A U-Net trained on the Wiener-filter loss reproduces the exact Wiener filter for masked, noisy CMB polarization maps, and the resulting E and B power spectra are unbiased, with errors that beat pseudo-Cℓ at the scales where primordial…

desk verdict Solid methods paper for CMB polarization with a genuinely useful iterative E-subtraction trick, but the B-mode branch rests on an untested leakage assumption and the abstract oversells the pseudo-Cℓ comparison. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10580 v3 pith:BIFAEJ7J submitted 2024-12-13 astro-ph.CO

Belén Costanza , Claudia G. Scóccola , Matías Zaldarriaga This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.CO

keywords cosmicmicrowavebackgroundpolarizationWienerfilterconvolutionalneuralnetworkU-NetE/B-modedecompositionE-to-Bleakagepowerspectrumestimationoptimalquadraticestimator

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a convolutional U-Net, trained with the same quadratic loss that defines the optimal Wiener filter, can stand in for the expensive exact filter on CMB polarization maps. On masked skies with realistic inhomogeneous noise, the network's E- and B-mode reconstructions closely track the conjugate-gradient Wiener solution after a few iterations of E-mode subtraction. Using those filtered maps, a simulation-based optimal quadratic estimator returns E and B power spectra that are unbiased over 100 maps, with single-map errors matching the inverse Fisher matrix and, in the low-multipole bin where primordial B-modes are sought, smaller than pseudo-Cℓ errors by 99% for the simpler mask and 95% for the complex mask. The practical payoff of the claim is near-optimal filtering and spectrum estimation at about one tenth of the conjugate-gradient compute cost.

What carries the argument

DeepWiener is a U-Net autoencoder whose input has a linear channel for the Q and U (or B) maps plus non-linear channels for the noise variance map and the mask, with the non-linear outputs multiplying the linear channel so that the filter remains linear in the data. The training objective is the Wiener-filter loss J_{Q,U}, equation (2.6): pixel-space noise-weighted residuals plus Fourier-space signal-covariance terms in the E/B basis. Because B is far weaker than E, the method iterates: it subtracts the network's E estimate, retrains on the residual Q and U maps, and repeats; once the residual is assumed B-dominated, it switches to the scalar loss J_B, equation (2.12), whose noise variance is estimated from simulations of B_obs - B_sky. The filtered maps then enter a simulation-based optimal quadratic estimator: a Fisher matrix and noise-bias vector are computed by applying the trained network to hundreds of fiducial simulations, and the band powers are recovered by inverting the Fisher relation. The machinery replaces the matrix inversion in ($S^{{-1}}$+R^T $N^{{-1}}$ R)^{-1} R^T $N^{{-1}}$ d with a trained feed-forward pass.

What would settle it

Train the full pipeline on signal-only simulations containing E-modes and no input B-modes; any recovered low-ℓ B band power above zero would reveal residual E-to-B leakage. A cleaner quantitative test: compute the cross-spectrum between the final residual B map and the true input E map; a nonzero low-ℓ correlation would mean the pure-B assumption is violated and the claimed unbiasedness is not guaranteed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the exact Wiener-filter solution for masked, inhomogeneously noisy polarization maps can be reproduced by DeepWiener, a U-Net trained with the Wiener-filter quadratic loss J_{Q,U}, and that the E-to-B leakage caused by the mask can be suppressed by iteratively subtracting the network's E-mode estimate from the Q and U maps. After three to five such rounds the residual maps are treated as B-dominated, and the network can instead be trained with a scalar loss J_B applied directly to the observed B-mode map. From these filtered maps the paper constructs a simulation-based optimal quadratic estimator; over 100 test maps the resulting E and B band powers are centered on the true spectrum, their errors match the inverse-Fisher diagonal, and at the low-ℓ bin relevant to primordial gravitational waves the error is 99% (Mask1) or 95% (Mask2) smaller than the purified pseudo-Cℓ error. The paper further states that this makes near-optimal polarization filtering and spectrum estimation available at roughly one tenth of the conjugate-gradient computation cost.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that after a few rounds of subtracting the network's E-mode estimate, the remaining Q and U maps are essentially pure B-mode, so the scalar loss used for the final B-mode training does not secretly fit leftover E-mode signal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A trained DeepWiener model can be applied to any number of maps with the same mask and noise properties, making noise-bias and Fisher-matrix simulations at the scale of 2000 maps practical rather than prohibitive.
Because the estimator remains unbiased when the true spectrum differs from the fiducial, the pipeline can measure an unknown B-mode signal rather than only validating on simulations.
The first-bin B-mode error reduction of 99% (Mask1) and 95% (Mask2) over purified pseudo-Cℓ, if correct, translates directly into stronger constraining power on the tensor-to-scalar ratio in masked survey patches.
More complex masks require more iterations (5 versus 4 under J_{Q,U}; 4 versus 3 under J_B), so the method's cost scales with mask complexity while staying about an order of magnitude below the conjugate-gradient method.
Per-map prediction cost is independent of the number of maps, so the approach becomes more favorable as survey volume grows.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The flat-sky, single-patch framework leaves open whether the same network and loss transfer to curved-sky, all-sky maps; if transferable, this style of filtering could serve as a fast map-level preprocessing step in end-to-end likelihood analyses.
A direct comparison against an unpurified and unapodized pure-B estimator, or against the exact quadratic estimator driven by the conjugate-gradient Wiener filter, would separate the gain due to the neural filter from the loss due to mask apodization in the pseudo-Cℓ baseline.
The iterative E-subtraction acts as a decontamination step that could in principle be applied inside existing pipelines before any spectrum estimator, not exclusively before the optimal quadratic estimator.
Because the bias-subtraction step is built from fiducial-spectrum simulations, the same pipeline could be extended to estimate E-B cross-spectra or to propagate the full band-power covariance, including off-diagonal terms, into parameter forecasts.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a solid methods paper. The genuinely new pieces are the iterative E-mode subtraction scheme (Secs. 2.1, 5.1, App. C) and the scalar J_B loss for B-mode Wiener filtering once the residual is assumed to be mostly B, applied to polarization maps with inhomogeneous noise and a simulation-based quadratic estimator built on the filtered maps. The core derivation is standard: the J_Q,U loss is the Wiener filter chi-squared, the estimator follows Seljak and Horowitz et al., and the PCG comparison is an honest convergence check. The mean B power spectra over 100 maps are unbiased and the measured errors track the inverse Fisher matrix. The ~10x speedup over PCG is relevant if you need thousands of simulations for bias and Fisher estimation.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. First, the abstract states that their errors are smaller than pseudo-Cℓ, but the body (Fig. 17) shows purified pseudo-Cℓ is actually smaller beyond ℓ≈750; the abstract overclaims. Second, the headline first-bin reductions partly come from the apodization imposed on the pseudo-Cℓ baseline. Third, and most important, the J_B loss is an approximation, as the authors themselves say in Sec. 2.1. The input to that network is assumed to be free of E-to-B leakage after a few rounds of subtraction, but there is no E-only null test to show that. The quadratic estimator's bias subtraction cancels leakage proportional to the fiducial E power, so any leakage proportional to (C_EE_true - C_EE_fid) would bias exactly the low-ℓ B bins where they claim 85-99% error reduction. The 100-map mean does not fully rule this out. Fourth, the iteration counts are post hoc and the cross-correlation curves in Figs. 9-10 have no error bars.

None of this breaks the central claim: the J_Q,U pipeline is sound, and the J_B variant is a reasonable approximation that works on the tests shown. But before adopting it for survey science, I would want an E-only null test and a quantification of the leakage residual into B as a function of C_EE_true - C_EE_fid.

The paper is for people building CMB polarization pipelines for S4/LiteBIRD/QUBIC who need fast approximate Wiener filtering and will check systematics themselves. It deserves a serious referee: the method is well-motivated, the code is public on GitHub, and the limitations are at least partly acknowledged. I would send it to review, asking the authors to address the leakage question and moderate the abstract.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper introduces DeepWiener, a U-Net trained to approximate the Wiener filter for CMB polarization maps with inhomogeneous noise and a sky mask. Because a single network trained on Q and U maps with the quadratic loss J_Q,U reconstructs the E-mode well but the B-mode poorly, the authors propose an iterative scheme: subtract successive E-mode estimates from the observed maps and eventually train on the residual B-mode map using a scalar loss J_B. The filtered maps are then fed into a simulation-based optimal quadratic estimator to obtain E- and B-mode band powers, with the noise bias and Fisher matrix computed from fiducial-spectrum simulations through the same network. The method is validated against the conjugate-gradient Wiener filter solution, the mean of 100 single-map power-spectrum estimates is found to be unbiased, the per-map errors are shown to match the inverse Fisher matrix, and the errors are compared with pseudo-C_ell estimates from NaMaster.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a practical, low-cost route to near-optimal polarized CMB map filtering and power-spectrum estimation: after training, the network applies the Wiener filter roughly an order of magnitude faster than the PCG method, making the simulation-based quadratic estimator feasible (Table 1). Strengths of the manuscript are that the training loss is exactly the Wiener-filter chi-squared, so the network's target is well defined; the public code and detailed appendices support reproducibility; the comparison with PCG is a genuine external convergence check; and the internal consistency between measured errors and the inverse Fisher matrix (Fig. 14) is a useful validation of the pipeline. The main risk is the B-mode branch: the J_B loss is explicitly an approximation resting on the assumption that the iterative subtraction leaves a residual dominated by B-modes, and this assumption is not independently quantified.

major comments (3)

[§2.1 (eqs. 2.7–2.12); §5.1 (Fig. 10)] The scalar loss J_B in eq. (2.12) is introduced as an approximation in which the residual maps Q^(3)_obs and U^(3)_obs contain only B-mode signal. This is the load-bearing assumption for the B-mode branch: if residual E-mode power survives the iterative subtraction, the low-ℓ B input is contaminated by E-to-B leakage that is linear in the E signal. Because the noise-bias term in eq. (2.23) is computed from fiducial-spectrum simulations, that subtraction cannot cancel leakage proportional to (C_EE^true − C_EE^fid). The 100-map mean in Fig. 13 and the cross-correlation with the PCG solution in Fig. 10 are supportive but not dispositive; a small leakage coefficient or a modest true-minus-fiducial difference can hide the bias. Please add a quantitative test: for example, measure the cross-correlation between B^(3)_obs (or the final B_NN) and the true E field as a function of ℓ, and repeat the power-spectrum validation with a strongly displaced true E spectrum, or with the E amplitude artificially boosted, to show that the low-ℓ B bias remains consistent with zero.
[§5.2 (eqs. 2.23–2.26; Fig. 13)] The estimator is unbiased only if the filter applied to the data is the same as the filter used to construct b_ℓ and F. The network is an approximation to the Wiener filter, and the paper validates the estimator for a single true spectrum that is close to the fiducial one. This leaves open a residual bias proportional to (C_true − C_fid) that would not be visible in an internal consistency check. I recommend validating with at least a second true spectrum, ideally with a larger displacement, and reporting the per-bin bias, or alternatively deriving the linear response of the estimator to C_true − C_fid and showing that it is subdominant to the statistical errors.
[§5.3 (Figs. 14 and 17)] The error bars in Fig. 14 match the inverse Fisher matrix, but that Fisher matrix is computed with the same approximate network filter; this demonstrates self-consistency of the pipeline rather than optimality of the filter. The claim that the method outperforms pseudo-Cℓ by a large factor would be strengthened by comparing against a quadratic estimator built from the exact PCG Wiener filter on a subset of maps, or against the analytic Fisher bound for the exact filter. Without such a comparison, the 99% and 95% error reductions quoted for the first bin are relative to the apodized purified pseudo-Cℓ pipeline and may overstate the contribution of the filter itself as opposed to the choice of estimator.

minor comments (6)

[§5.2 (eqs. 5.2–5.3)] The second expression should read ⟨|s^B_s|^2⟩ = S^B_fid; as printed it repeats the E-mode expression.
[§5.2 (after eq. 5.5)] The assumption d^Q_n = d^U_n, i.e., identical noise realizations for Q and U, is physically restrictive and should be justified, or the analysis repeated with independent Q and U noise, since real polarization noise is not identical in the two Stokes parameters.
[Figs. 13 and 16] The error bars are not defined; please state whether they are the standard deviation of single-map estimates or the standard error of the 100-map mean.
[§3] The architecture section gives the general U-Net structure but not the layer count, filter sizes, stride, or activation functions; since the code is public this is not blocking, but a short table or explicit reference to the repository's configuration would improve reproducibility.
[§5.1 and Appendix C] The stopping criterion for the iterative E-subtraction is the B-mode cross-correlation with PCG, but the actual correlation values at each iteration are not reported; adding them would make the convergence of the iteration transparent.
[§5.3 (eq. 5.9)] The notation sY^B_l and the differential operator D^B_s are not defined; the spin-weighted spherical harmonics and the purification operator should be introduced explicitly for readers not familiar with NaMaster.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the network optimizes the Wiener-filter objective directly, and the power-spectrum validation is external (PCG, true-spectrum simulations, pseudo-Cℓ).

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained rather than circular. The loss function J_Q,U in eq. (2.6) is exactly the quadratic form whose minimization defines the Wiener filter (eqs. 2.3–2.4), so training the network to minimize it is a direct optimization problem; comparing the result to the PCG solution of the same linear system is an external convergence check, not a prediction forced by construction. The iterative E-subtraction and the scalar B-mode loss J_B are explicitly acknowledged as approximations ('This expression is not derived from (2.6) but rather is an approximation...'), with the effective noise variance sigma*^2 estimated from simulations; this is a stated modeling assumption, not a hidden equivalence. The power-spectrum stage uses the standard simulation-based optimal quadratic estimator, computing the noise bias and Fisher matrix from fiducial simulations and then estimating a 'true' spectrum with different cosmological parameters; the agreement between empirical errors and the inverse Fisher matrix (Fig. 14) is a consistency test, and the comparison with pseudo-Cℓ (Figs. 16–17) is an external benchmark. Self-citations to prior work [28, 35] supply the architecture and the temperature-map implementation, but they are not invoked to forbid alternatives or to establish uniqueness of the present method, so they are not load-bearing circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The pipeline's claims rest on tuned or estimated inputs (noise rescaling to set the B-mode noise cutoff at ℓ≈1260, learning rate, filter counts, epoch count, 3-5 iterations chosen post hoc, apodization width for the baseline) and on domain assumptions (flat sky, identical Q and U noise, simulation-calibrated sigma*^2, residual maps free of E-mode contamination, small fiducial-to-true displacement). None of these is a fit of the output spectrum to the target, but together they bound the demonstrated validity to flat-sky, Planck-like-noise, near-fiducial test conditions. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)

Noise variance rescaling factor = unspecified (rescaled so mean noise cuts B-mode at ℓ≈1260)
Sec. 4: the Planck-derived variance map is rescaled by hand so the mean noise level cuts the B-mode spectrum at ℓ≈1260; this sets the signal-to-noise regime of all experiments and the ℓ-range where B-mode results are meaningful.
Learning rate = 3.36e-5
Sec. 5.1: chosen among tested hyperparameters; affects the convergence quality of the learned Wiener filter approximation.
Number of filters per layer = 16-32
Sec. 5.1: hyperparameter range chosen by experimentation; the architecture capacity is not otherwise justified.
Iteration count for E-mode subtraction = 4 (Mask1) / 5 (Mask2) for J_Q,U; 3 / 4 for J_B
Secs. 5.1 and C: stopping is based on the observed cross-correlation with the PCG solution reaching a satisfactory level, chosen post hoc per mask and loss function; no pre-registered threshold.
Pseudo-Cℓ apodization width (Gaussian window) = unspecified
Sec. 5.3: applied to the comparison baseline to enable purification; the width controls how much large-scale signal is lost and thereby the baseline error bars in the first bins where the largest improvement is claimed.
Fiducial-to-true spectrum displacement = unspecified (slightly altered Planck 2013 parameters)
Secs. 4 and 5.2: the test true spectrum is only slightly displaced from the fiducial used for bias and Fisher; unbiasedness is demonstrated only in a small neighborhood of the fiducial.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Flat-sky approximation with periodic boundary conditions on 20x20 degree patches (256x256 pixels) for spin-2 fields and the Wiener filter.
Appendix B and Sec. 4: all maps, masks, noise and the E/B transform (eqs. B.9-B.10) are flat-sky; curved-sky effects and mask geometry on the sphere are not treated.
domain assumption Q and U noise realizations are identical (d_Q^n = d_U^n).
Sec. 5.2, eqs. (5.4)-(5.5): the noise draws used for bias and Fisher simulations share the same realization for Q and U; real instruments have correlated but not identical Q and U noise, so the E/B noise covariance is simplified.
domain assumption The B-mode variance map sigma*^2 for the J_B loss, estimated from simulations of B_obs - B_sky, is a faithful per-pixel noise model.
Secs. 2.1 and 4: sigma*^2 is computed from the difference of observed and sky B-maps over many realizations; the J_B loss is valid only if this empirically estimated variance is accurate.
ad hoc to paper After iterative subtraction, the residual maps Q^(3)_obs and U^(3)_obs contain essentially only B-mode signal.
Sec. 2.1, eqs. (2.10)-(2.11): this is the load-bearing premise for treating the residual as a scalar B field; the paper itself flags J_B as an approximation.
standard math The true spectrum lies close enough to the fiducial for the quadratic expansion of the log-likelihood (eq. 2.20) and the derivative relation Pi_l = S_fid/Theta_l (eq. 2.19) to hold.
Sec. 2.2: standard optimal quadratic estimator assumptions; the paper tests only slightly altered spectra, so the validity regime is not stress-tested.
domain assumption The PCG solution of the Wiener-filter system (A.2) is the exact reference solution.
Appendix A and Sec. 5.1: the neural network is validated against PCG with a simple S^-1 preconditioner; PCG accuracy itself is not quantified (no residual tolerances reported).
standard math The CMB signal is a Gaussian random field.
Sec. 2.1: the Wiener filter and the optimal quadratic estimator both assume Gaussianity; standard in CMB analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DeepWiener: Neural Networks for CMB polarization maps and power spectrum computation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BIFAEJ7J

@misc{pith2026241210580,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DeepWiener: Neural Networks for CMB polarization maps and power spectrum computation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BIFAEJ7J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10580}
}

abstract

To study the early Universe, it is essential to estimate cosmological parameters with high accuracy, which depends on the optimal reconstruction of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) maps and the measurement of their power spectrum. In this paper, we generalize the neural network developed for applying the Wiener Filter, initially presented for temperature maps in previous work, to polarization maps. Our neural network has a UNet architecture, including an extra channel for the noise variance map, to account for inhomogeneous noise, and a channel for the mask. In addition, we propose an iterative approach for reconstructing the E and B-mode fields, while addressing the E-to-B leakage present in the maps due to incomplete sky coverage. The accuracy achieved is satisfactory compared to the Wiener Filter solution computed with the standard Conjugate Gradient method, and it is highly efficient, enabling the computation of the power spectrum of an unknown signal using the optimal quadratic estimator. We further evaluate the quality of the reconstructed maps at the power spectrum level along with their corresponding errors, finding that these errors are smaller than those obtained using the well-known pseudo-$C_\ell$ approach. Our results show that increasing complexity in the applied mask presents a more significant challenge for B-mode reconstruction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Searching for Inflationary Physics with the CMB Trispectrum: 1. Primordial Theory & Optimal Estimators
astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A set of quasi-optimal CMB trispectrum estimators is derived for local, EFT, direction-dependent, spinning-particle, point-source, and lensing templates, enabling first collider searches.
Searching for Inflationary Physics with the CMB Trispectrum: 3. Constraints from Planck
astro-ph.CO 2025-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A comprehensive Planck PR4 trispectrum analysis finds no primordial non-Gaussianity across 33 templates and sets leading constraints, including tau_NL loc < 1500 at 95% CL.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Zaldarriaga and U

M. Zaldarriaga and U. Seljak,All-sky analysis of polarization in the microwave background, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 1830 [astro-ph/9609170]

arXiv 1997
[2]

Hinshaw, D

G. Hinshaw, D. Larson, E. Komatsu, D.N. Spergel, C.L. Bennett, J. Dunkley et al.,Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, ApJS208(2013) 19 [1212.5226]

arXiv 2013
[3]

Bennett, D

C.L. Bennett, D. Larson, J.L. Weiland, N. Jarosik, G. Hinshaw, N. Odegard et al.,Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results, ApJS 208(2013) 20 [1212.5225]

arXiv 2013
[4]

Aghanim, Y

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al., Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, A&A641(2020) A1 [1807.06205]

arXiv 2020
[5]

Aghanim, Y

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al., Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods, A&A641(2020) A5 [1907.12875]

arXiv 2020
[6]

Aiola, E

S. Aiola, E. Calabrese, L. Maurin, S. Naess, B.L. Schmitt, M.H. Abitbol et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2020(2020) 047 [2007.07288]

arXiv 2020
[7]

S.K. Choi, M. Hasselfield, S.-P.P. Ho, B. Koopman, M. Lungu, M.H. Abitbol et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: a measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background power spectra at 98 and 150 GHz, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2020(2020) 045 [2007.07289]

arXiv 2020
[8]

Henning, J.T

J.W. Henning, J.T. Sayre, C.L. Reichardt, P.A.R. Ade, A.J. Anderson, J.E. Austermann et al., Measurements of the Temperature and E-mode Polarization of the CMB from 500 Square Degrees of SPTpol Data, ApJ852(2018) 97 [1707.09353]

arXiv 2018

Show all 47 references

[9]

Hazumi, P.A.R

M. Hazumi, P.A.R. Ade, A. Adler, E. Allys, K. Arnold, D. Auguste et al.,LiteBIRD satellite: JAXA’s new strategic L-class mission for all-sky surveys of cosmic microwave background polarization, inSpace Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave...

2020
[10]

Hanany, M

S. Hanany, M. Alvarez, E. Artis, P. Ashton, J. Aumont, R. Aurlien et al.,PICO: Probe of Inflation and Cosmic Origins,arXiv e-prints(2019) arXiv:1902.10541 [1902.10541]

2019 arXiv
[11]

Benson, P.A.R

B.A. Benson, P.A.R. Ade, Z. Ahmed, S.W. Allen, K. Arnold, J.E. Austermann et al.,SPT-3G: a next-generation cosmic microwave background polarization experiment on the South Pole telescope, inMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy...

2014 arXiv
[12]

P. Ade, J. Aguirre, Z. Ahmed, S. Aiola, A. Ali, D. Alonso et al.,The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2019(2019) 056 [1808.07445]

2019 arXiv
[13]

Abazajian, G

K. Abazajian, G. Addison, P. Adshead, Z. Ahmed, S.W. Allen, D. Alonso et al.,CMB-S4 Science Case, Reference Design, and Project Plan,arXiv e-prints(2019) arXiv:1907.04473 [1907.04473]

2019 arXiv
[14]

Hamilton, L

J.C. Hamilton, L. Mousset, E.S. Battistelli, P. de Bernardis, M.A. Bigot-Sazy, P. Chanial et al.,QUBIC I: Overview and science program, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2022(2022) 034 [2011.02213]. – 30 –

2022 arXiv
[15]

Mousset, M.M

L. Mousset, M.M. Gamboa Lerena, E.S. Battistelli, P. de Bernardis, P. Chanial, G. D’Alessandro et al.,QUBIC II: Spectral polarimetry with bolometric interferometry, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2022(2022) 035 [2010.15119]

2022 arXiv
[16]

Mennella, P

A. Mennella, P. Ade, G. Amico, D. Auguste, J. Aumont, S. Banfi et al.,QUBIC: Exploring the primordial Universe with the Qamp;U Bolometric Interferometer,arXiv e-prints(2018) arXiv:1812.00785 [1812.00785]

2018 arXiv
[17]

Tegmark,How to measure CMB power spectra without losing information, Phys

M. Tegmark,How to measure CMB power spectra without losing information, Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 5895 [astro-ph/9611174]

1997 arXiv
[18]

Wiener,Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series

N. Wiener,Extrapolation, interpolation, and smoothing of stationary time series. Vol. 2, MIT press, Cambridge, MA (1949)

1949
[19]

Zaroubi, Y

S. Zaroubi, Y. Hoffman, K.B. Fisher and O. Lahav,Wiener Reconstruction of the Large-Scale Structure, ApJ449(1995) 446 [astro-ph/9410080]

1995 arXiv
[20]

Seljak,Cosmography and power spectrum estimation: a unified approach,Astrophys

U. Seljak,Cosmography and power spectrum estimation: a unified approach,Astrophys. J.503 (1998) 492 [astro-ph/9710269]

1998 arXiv
[21]

Press, S.A

W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling and B.P. Flannery,Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, USA, 3 ed. (2007)

2007
[22]

Wandelt, D.L

B.D. Wandelt, D.L. Larson and A. Lakshminarayanan,Global, exact cosmic microwave background data analysis using Gibbs sampling, Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 083511 [astro-ph/0310080]

2004 arXiv
[23]

Smith, O

K.M. Smith, O. Zahn and O. Doré,Detection of gravitational lensing in the cosmic microwave background, Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 043510 [0705.3980]

2007 arXiv
[24]

Elsner and B.D

F. Elsner and B.D. Wandelt,Efficient Wiener filtering without preconditioning, A&A549 (2013) A111 [1210.4931]

2013 arXiv
[25]

Kodi Ramanah, G

D. Kodi Ramanah, G. Lavaux and B.D. Wandelt,Wiener filter reloaded: fast signal reconstruction without preconditioning, MNRAS468(2017) 1782 [1702.08852]

2017 arXiv
[26]

Aragon-Calvo,Classifying the large-scale structure of the universe with deep neural networks, MNRAS484(2019) 5771 [1804.00816]

M.A. Aragon-Calvo,Classifying the large-scale structure of the universe with deep neural networks, MNRAS484(2019) 5771 [1804.00816]

2019 arXiv
[27]

Petroff, G.E

M.A. Petroff, G.E. Addison, C.L. Bennett and J.L. Weiland,Full-sky Cosmic Microwave Background Foreground Cleaning Using Machine Learning, ApJ903(2020) 104 [2004.11507]

2020 arXiv
[28]

Costanza, C.G

B. Costanza, C.G. Scóccola and M. Zaldarriaga,Enhancing CMB map reconstruction and power spectrum estimation with convolutional neural networks, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2024(2024) 041 [2312.09943]

2024 arXiv
[29]

Seljak, G

U. Seljak, G. Aslanyan, Y. Feng and C. Modi,Towards optimal extraction of cosmological information from nonlinear data, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2017(2017) 009 [1706.06645]

2017 arXiv
[30]

Horowitz, U

B. Horowitz, U. Seljak and G. Aslanyan,Efficient optimal reconstruction of linear fields and band-powers from cosmological data, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2019(2019) 035 [1810.00503]

2019 arXiv
[31]

E.F. Bunn, M. Zaldarriaga, M. Tegmark and A. de Oliveira-Costa,E/B decomposition of finite pixelized CMB maps, Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 023501 [astro-ph/0207338]

2003 arXiv
[32]

Smith and M

K.M. Smith and M. Zaldarriaga,General solution to the E-B mixing problem, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 043001 [astro-ph/0610059]

2007 arXiv
[33]

Pal and R

S. Pal and R. Saha,Reconstruction of full sky CMB E and B modes spectra removing E-to-B leakage from partial sky using deep learning,Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy44(2023) 84 [2211.09112]. – 31 –

2023 arXiv
[34]

Bunn and B

E.F. Bunn and B. Wandelt,Pure E and B polarization maps via Wiener filtering, Phys. Rev. D 96(2017) 043523 [1610.03345]

2017 arXiv
[35]

Münchmeyer and K.M

M. Münchmeyer and K.M. Smith,Fast Wiener filtering of CMB maps with Neural Networks, arXiv e-prints(2019) arXiv:1905.05846 [1905.05846]

2019 arXiv
[36]

Alonso, J

D. Alonso, J. Sanchez, A. Slosar and LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration,A unified pseudo-Cℓ framework, MNRAS484(2019) 4127 [1809.09603]

2019 arXiv
[37]

Ronneberger, P

O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer and T. Brox,U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation,arXiv e-prints(2015) arXiv:1505.04597 [1505.04597]

2015 arXiv
[38]

Górski, E

K.M. Górski, E. Hivon, A.J. Banday, B.D. Wandelt, F.K. Hansen, M. Reinecke et al., HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere, ApJ622(2005) 759 [astro-ph/0409513]

2005 arXiv
[39]

Zonca, L

A. Zonca, L. Singer, D. Lenz, M. Reinecke, C. Rosset, E. Hivon et al.,healpy: equal area pixelization and spherical harmonics transforms for data on the sphere in python,Journal of Open Source Software4(2019) 1298

2019
[40]

Lewis, A

A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby,Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Models, ApJ538(2000) 473 [astro-ph/9911177]

2000 arXiv
[41]

Planck Collaboration, P.A.R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown et al.,Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, A&A571(2014) A16 [1303.5076]

2014 arXiv
[42]

Kogut, D.N

A. Kogut, D.N. Spergel, C. Barnes, C.L. Bennett, M. Halpern, G. Hinshaw et al.,First-year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (wmap)* observations: Temperature-polarization correlation,The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series148(2003) 161

2003
[43]

Dosovitskiy, L

A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner et al.,An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale,arXiv e-prints (2020) arXiv:2010.11929 [2010.11929]

2020 arXiv
[44]

Chen,Matrix Preconditioning Techniques and Applications, Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics, Cambridge University Press (2005)

K. Chen,Matrix Preconditioning Techniques and Applications, Cambridge Monographs on Applied and Computational Mathematics, Cambridge University Press (2005)

2005
[45]

Kamionkowski, A

M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and A. Stebbins,Statistics of cosmic microwave background polarization, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 7368 [astro-ph/9611125]

1997 arXiv
[46]

Hu,Weak lensing of the CMB: A harmonic approach, Phys

W. Hu,Weak lensing of the CMB: A harmonic approach, Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 043007 [astro-ph/0001303]

2000 arXiv
[47]

Costanza, C.G

M.B. Costanza, C.G. Scóccola and M. Zaldarriaga,Wiener Filter for cosmic microwave background maps using neural networks,Boletín de la Asociación Argentina de Astronomía La Plata Argentina64(2023) 193. – 32 –

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Zaldarriaga and U

M. Zaldarriaga and U. Seljak,All-sky analysis of polarization in the microwave background, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 1830 [astro-ph/9609170]

arXiv 1997

[2] [2]

Hinshaw, D

G. Hinshaw, D. Larson, E. Komatsu, D.N. Spergel, C.L. Bennett, J. Dunkley et al.,Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, ApJS208(2013) 19 [1212.5226]

arXiv 2013

[3] [3]

Bennett, D

C.L. Bennett, D. Larson, J.L. Weiland, N. Jarosik, G. Hinshaw, N. Odegard et al.,Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and Results, ApJS 208(2013) 20 [1212.5225]

arXiv 2013

[4] [4]

Aghanim, Y

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al., Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, A&A641(2020) A1 [1807.06205]

arXiv 2020

[5] [5]

Aghanim, Y

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al., Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods, A&A641(2020) A5 [1907.12875]

arXiv 2020

[6] [6]

Aiola, E

S. Aiola, E. Calabrese, L. Maurin, S. Naess, B.L. Schmitt, M.H. Abitbol et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2020(2020) 047 [2007.07288]

arXiv 2020

[7] [7]

S.K. Choi, M. Hasselfield, S.-P.P. Ho, B. Koopman, M. Lungu, M.H. Abitbol et al.,The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: a measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background power spectra at 98 and 150 GHz, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2020(2020) 045 [2007.07289]

arXiv 2020

[8] [8]

Henning, J.T

J.W. Henning, J.T. Sayre, C.L. Reichardt, P.A.R. Ade, A.J. Anderson, J.E. Austermann et al., Measurements of the Temperature and E-mode Polarization of the CMB from 500 Square Degrees of SPTpol Data, ApJ852(2018) 97 [1707.09353]

arXiv 2018