Classification of ancient noncollapsed flows in $\mathbb{R}^4$

Kyeongsu Choi; Robert Haslhofer

Classification of ancient noncollapsed flows in $\mathbb{R}^4$

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Any ancient noncollapsed mean curvature flow in $\mathbb{R}^4$ belongs to one explicit list of standard shrinkers, bowls, ovals, and two one-parameter families.

desk verdict Completes the R4 noncollapsed singularity classification with a serious new analytic toolbox; technically heavy but no apparent load-bearing flaw. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10581 v2 pith:UPY5ND4L submitted 2024-12-13 math.DG math.AP

Kyeongsu Choi , Robert Haslhofer This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DGmath.AP MSC 53C4453E10

keywords meancurvatureflowancientnoncollapsedsolutionssingularityclassificationR^4bubble-sheetdifferentialnecktheoremselfsimilartranslationexoticovals

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper completes the classification of noncollapsed singularities of mean curvature flow in four dimensions. It proves that every ancient noncollapsed solution, the possible blowup limits obtained by zooming into a singularity, is one of a short explicit list: standard shrinking spheres, cylinders and planes, bowls, ovals, or one of the known one-parameter families of translators and ovals. The hard case is mixed convergence, where the flow approaches a round bubble-sheet quickly in one direction and quadratically in another; the paper introduces a differential neck theorem that detects the tiny slope responsible for translation. If correct, this gives a complete catalog of singularities for mean-convex flows in $\mathbb{R}^4$ and a canonical neighborhood theorem around high-curvature points.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the differential neck theorem: for every space-time point $X$, the $x_1$-derivative $u_1$ of the bubble-sheet profile, localized near the graphical radius $\rho(\tau)$, equals $a e^{\tau/2}$ plus a controlled error, with a nonzero constant $a = a(M)$ attached to the whole flow. The proof builds this theorem from a Merle-Zaag switch dynamics for the slope's spectral coefficients, elongated anisotropic barriers obtained by rotating 2d shrinkers around ellipses, and propagation-of-smallness estimates that push decay of $|\nu_1|$ from a central strip to the whole level set; Hamilton's Harnack inequality then turns the slope control into selfsimilarity.

What would settle it

Construct an ancient noncollapsed solution in $\mathbb{R}^4$ whose tangent flow at $-\infty$ is the round bubble-sheet and whose bubble-sheet function satisfies the mixed-convergence expansion (5), but whose level-set eccentricity grows faster than $\log|t|$ or whose cap distance grows faster than $C|t|$; such a solution would violate the cap-distance estimate and the no-exotic-oval conclusion. A more direct check is numerical: evolve a strictly convex hypersurface in $\mathbb{R}^4$ that is very long in the $x_1$ direction under mean curvature flow and look for a forward-time decrease of the mean-curvature speed at the caps, since any decrease of $H$ with time contradicts the Harnack input used in Theorem 11.12.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Any ancient noncollapsed mean curvature flow in $\mathbb{R}^4$ is, up to scaling and rigid motion, one of the following: the standard shrinkers $S^3$, $\mathbb{R}\times S^2$, $\mathbb{R}^2\times S^1$, or $\mathbb{R}^3$; the 3d-bowl or $\mathbb{R}\times$ 2d-bowl; the $\mathbb{Z}_2\times O_3$-symmetric 3d-oval, the $O_2\times O_2$-symmetric 3d-oval, or $\mathbb{R}\times$ 2d-oval; or one of the one-parameter families of translators and of 3d-ovals. The proof splits the bubble-sheet analysis into fast, slow, and mixed convergence; the mixed case is handled by a differential neck theorem showing that the slope of the bubble-sheet profile is a nonzero exponential, which forces every noncompact strictly convex solution to be selfsimilarly translating and rules out exotic ovals.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes Hamilton's Harnack monotonicity for the mean-curvature speed of ancient noncollapsed flows in $\mathbb{R}^4$; if the speed could decrease going forward in time, the final argument that cap speeds are constant across levels and hence the flow translates self-similarly would break.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every blowup limit of mean-convex mean curvature flow in $\mathbb{R}^4$, and in any 4-manifold, is on the classified list, giving a canonical neighborhood theorem: above a curvature threshold every point sees one of the listed models at scale $H^{-1}$.
Exotic ovals do not exist: there is no compact ancient noncollapsed solution with mixed bubble-sheet convergence, closing the last potential compact model.
Every noncompact strictly convex ancient noncollapsed flow in $\mathbb{R}^4$ is selfsimilarly translating, so non-selfsimilar ancient solutions such as slowly accelerating bowls are ruled out.
The classification is sharp: all listed examples are known to exist, so the set of noncollapsed singularity models in $\mathbb{R}^4$ is now exactly this finite plus one-parameter list.
The $\mathbb{R}^4$ canonical neighborhood theorem provides the natural input for mean-convex flow with surgery in $\mathbb{R}^4$ and for the mean-convex neighborhood conjecture in four dimensions.
The nonzero constant $a(M)$ in the differential neck theorem gives a computable invariant of a singularity: its sign fixes the translation direction and its size the translation speed, which may be measurable from time-slice data.
The anisotropic propagation-of-smallness estimates look transferable to 4d Ricci flow $\kappa$-solutions, where a similar mixed-mode problem appears in curvature profiles; an analogous differential neck theorem could organize the 4d Ricci singularity classification.
A concrete testable extension is to use the theorem's canonical neighborhood structure to construct surgeries in $\mathbb{R}^4$ with uniform neck parameters, since the classified models specify exactly which necks and caps can appear.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Bottom line: the theorem is the real thing. It closes the mixed-convergence case that the five predecessor papers explicitly left open, and the list in Theorem 1.2 is the expected one. The new machinery—switch dynamics, anisotropic barriers, propagation of smallness, and especially the differential neck theorem with the explicit 7/3 and 2/3 exponents—is substantial. These are not cosmetic refinements; they are what let the authors detect an exponentially small slope under a much larger quadratic term. The proof is organized well: reductions to prior classifications, then the mixed case, bounded bubble-sheet scale, then unbounded. I read the differential neck theorem and the final rigidity arguments closely and did not find a circular step or a fitted constant. The differential neck constant a(M) is derived and shown nonzero by contradiction, not assumed. The paper also honestly flags its own dependency on previous work, including the slow-convergence case from [CDD+], which is only listed as to appear.

Soft spots, in proportion. The biggest is external dependency: the slow-convergence case relies on [CDD+], which is not yet publicly available in the same verified form. The authors state Theorem 1.6 as established; the referee will have to trust that chain or chase the preprint. Second, the applicability of Hamilton's Harnack inequality B_t H >= 0 in this noncompact ancient setting is cited to [Ham95] plus [DS23, BLL23]. That is standard in the program, and the way it is used in Sections 10–11—to pin H(P_h)=1 and invoke rigidity—is consistent with the stated hypotheses. Still, it is the load-bearing input most worth checking. Third, the paper is dense; independent verification of the bootstrap constants and maximum-principle estimates will take an expert weeks. That is a cost, not a defect. I did not see invented entities or free parameters. The citation pattern is heavy on the same group's earlier papers, but this is a sequential program and the dependencies are explicit rather than hidden.

Who is this for? Geometric analysts working on MCF singularities, and anyone building surgery or canonical neighborhood theorems in R4. A serious referee should be assigned. The main theorem deserves a strong journal slot. If I were refereeing, I would ask for the [CDD+] dependency to be stated clearly in the introduction—it is, but only as 'to appear'—and for a short note on the Harnack hypotheses. No structural revision needed. I would bring it to reading group and cite it. Verdict: engage.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper completes the classification programme for ancient noncollapsed mean curvature flows in R^4. After reducing to the case where the tangent flow at -infinity is a bubble-sheet with mixed convergence, the authors introduce a localized slope function and prove a differential neck theorem (Theorems 1.10 and 9.9) showing that the relevant slope is, up to a universal error, a e^{tau/2} with a nonzero constant a(M). They then use this theorem to rule out compact exotic ovals and to show that every noncompact strictly convex ancient noncollapsed flow is selfsimilarly translating. Combining this with the prior fast-convergence, slow-convergence, and translator classifications, they obtain the complete list in Theorem 1.2 and the canonical-neighborhood consequence in Corollary 1.3.

Significance. If correct, this is a decisive result: it settles the classification of ancient noncollapsed mean curvature flows in R^4 and hence gives a complete list of possible blowup limits of mean-convex flows in four dimensions, answering questions of White and Wang. The paper contains a substantial amount of novel hard analysis: Merle-Zaag switch dynamics for the slope function, anisotropic barriers and propagation of smallness estimates, and a quantitatively sharp differential neck theorem. The main theorem is not an input to the proof: the constant a(M) is derived and shown to be nonzero by contradiction, and the final rigidity step is obtained from the cited Harnack inequality rather than from assuming the classification. The proof is explicit about the exponents involved, and I found no internal contradiction or circular dependence. The principal caveat is the reliance on the companion paper [CDD+] for the slow-convergence case, which the manuscript states is to appear; I did not find any indication that this dependence is circular, but the journal should confirm that all cited 'to appear' results are in final form.

minor comments (5)

[Section 2, after (43)] The inequality H(p,t) <= <x,nu>/|t| is stated for a flow normalized so that 0 is in K_0; for a general ancient solution one should explicitly translate in space-time. The intended meaning is clear from the context, but a one-line clarification would prevent misreading.
[Section 6.1, near (189)] The quantity omega(tau) is defined with sup over tau' <= min{tau, tau_sp(X)}, whereas the introductory version in (13) uses sup over tau' <= tau. Please align the two definitions or explain why the switch-time truncation is harmless there.
[Section 11.3, after (323)] The text refers to 'Proposition 11.3 (eccentricity scale)', but the statement with that content is Corollary 11.3. The cross-reference should be corrected.
[Theorem 1.10] The effective range in which the strong error estimate is really useful is tau <= tau_* - (7/4) log max{1,Z}^2, as the authors explain in the paragraph after (7). It would help the reader if this range were displayed as part of the theorem statement itself.
[Section 11.3, proof of Claim 11.14] In the comparison argument involving the function phi_s, the notation t in (337) and (338) is used both for the time variable and for the fixed time T?delta; writing the fixed time as t_0 or s would remove the ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the differential neck theorem is a self-contained hard-analysis result with no fitted parameters, and prior same-group results are used as external dependencies rather than as inputs to the central claim.

full rationale

The paper's central new contribution is the differential neck theorem (Theorem 1.10), which asserts that the slope u1 behaves like a e^{τ/2} for a universal constant a(M) ≠ 0. This constant is not fitted: Theorem 9.6 proves a ≠ 0 by contradiction, showing that a = 0 would propagate super-smallness and contradict the cap-distance lower bound. The estimates leading to the theorem are derived in the paper from the mean curvature flow equations, spectral properties of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck operator, barrier constructions, and maximum-principle arguments, not from the classification being proved. Prior results such as the normal form in Theorem 1.4 and the fast/slow case classifications from [DH24, DH23, CHH24, CDD+] are cited to reduce to the mixed-convergence case; these are external dependencies and do not assume Theorem 1.2. The slow case does rely on the unpublished same-group paper [CDD+], which is a legitimate completeness concern but not a circular step: no equation of the target classification is used as an input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Hamilton's Harnack inequality is cited as an external theorem with stated hypotheses, and the steps forcing H(P_h) = 1 and the final rigidity conclusion are applications of that theorem rather than restatements of the desired result. Accordingly, no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the paper is self-contained on its main new argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof is analytic and depends on a long chain of prior results, many by overlapping authors. No free parameters are fitted to data; the constants a(M), tau_sp(X), and related quantities are derived through the proof. No new physical or geometric entities are postulated.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Ancient noncollapsed flows in R^4 that do not split off a line are strictly convex.
Invoked in Section 2 (Notation and preliminaries), citing [HK17]; used to reduce the classification to convex flows.
domain assumption The tangent flow at -infinity is either a round neck or a round bubble-sheet, and the mixed-convergence normal form (33) holds in the remaining case.
Taken from the prior classification papers [CM15, HK17, DH24, DH23]; this sets up the case split that the paper completes.
domain assumption Hamilton's Harnack inequality B_t H >= 0 holds for these flows.
Invoked after equation (43) with citations [Ham95] and [DS23, BLL23]; used in Sections 10 and 11 for the selfsimilarity conclusion.
domain assumption Zhu's bubble-sheet symmetry improvement bounds the theta-dependence.
Used in equation (55) and Theorem 4.4, citing [Zhu22] and [DH24, Proposition 2.7]; the proof needs almost O_2-symmetry.
standard math Standard parabolic maximum principle, interior estimates, and the Merle-Zaag ODE lemma.
Used throughout Sections 3 through 9; no new foundational axioms are introduced.
domain assumption Prior classification theorems for fast convergence, slow convergence, and translators [CHH24, CDD+, CHH23] are valid.
The paper explicitly builds on these results to reduce to mixed convergence.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classification of ancient noncollapsed flows in $\mathbb{R}^4$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UPY5ND4L

@misc{pith2026241210581,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classification of ancient noncollapsed flows in $\mathbbR^4$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UPY5ND4L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10581}
}

abstract

In this paper, we classify all noncollapsed singularities of the mean curvature flow in $\mathbb{R}^4$. Specifically, we prove that any ancient noncollapsed solution either is one of the classical historical examples (namely $\mathbb{R}^j\times S^{3-j}$, $\mathbb{R}\times $2d-bowl, $\mathbb{R}\times $2d-oval, the rotationally symmetric 3d-bowl, or a cohomogeneity-one 3d-oval), or belongs to the 1-parameter family of $\mathbb{Z}_2\times \mathrm{O}_2$-symmetric 3d-translators constructed by Hoffman-Ilmanen-Martin-White, or belongs to the 1-parameter family of $\mathbb{Z}_2^2\times \mathrm{O}_2$-symmetric ancient 3d-ovals constructed by Du-Haslhofer. In light of the five prior papers on the classification program in $\mathbb{R}^4$ from our collaborations with Du, Hershkovits, and Choi-Daskalopoulos-Sesum, the major remaining challenge is the case of mixed behaviour, where the convergence to the round bubble-sheet is fast in $x_1$-direction, but logarithmically slow in $x_2$-direction. To address this, we prove a differential neck theorem, which allows us to capture the (dauntingly small) slope in $x_1$-direction. To establish the differential neck theorem, we introduce a slew of new ideas of independent interest, including switch and differential Merle-Zaag dynamics, anisotropic barriers, and propagation of smallness estimates. Applying our differential neck theorem, we show that every noncompact strictly convex solution is selfsimilarly translating, and also rule out exotic ovals.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Unique asymptotics of $SO(k)\times SO(n-k+1)$ symmetric ancient ovals of Ricci flow
math.DG 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

SO(k)×SO(n-k+1)-symmetric compact non-self-similar κ-solutions of Ricci flow have unique sharp asymptotics for the profile G, which algebraically determine the second profile F.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Angenent, S

S. Angenent, S. Brendle, P. Daskalopoulos, and N. Sesum. Unique asymptotics of compact ancient solutions to three-dimensional R icci flow. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 75(5):1032--1073, 2022

work page 2022
[2]

Angenent, P

S. Angenent, P. Daskalopoulos, and N. Sesum. Unique asymptotics of ancient convex mean curvature flow solutions. J. Differential Geom. , 111(3):381--455, 2019

work page 2019
[3]

Angenent, P

S. Angenent, P. Daskalopoulos, and N. Sesum. Uniqueness of two-convex closed ancient solutions to the mean curvature flow. Ann. of Math. (2) , 192(2):353--436, 2020

work page 2020
[4]

B. Andrews. Noncollapsing in mean-convex mean curvature flow. Geom. Topol. , 16(3):1413--1418, 2012

work page 2012
[5]

Brendle and K

S. Brendle and K. Choi. Uniqueness of convex ancient solutions to mean curvature flow in R^3 . Invent. Math. , 217(1):35--76, 2019

work page 2019
[6]

Brendle and K

S. Brendle and K. Choi. Uniqueness of convex ancient solutions to mean curvature flow in higher dimensions. Geom. Topol. , 25(5):2195--2234, 2021

work page 2021
[7]

Brendle, P

S. Brendle, P. Daskalopoulos, and N. Sesum. Uniqueness of compact ancient solutions to three-dimensional R icci flow. Invent. Math. , 226(2):579--651, 2021

work page 2021
[8]

Bamler and B

R. Bamler and B. Kleiner. Ricci flow and contractibility of spaces of metrics. arXiv:1909.08710 , 2019

arXiv 1909

Show all 57 references

[9]

Bamler and B

R. Bamler and B. Kleiner. Uniqueness and stability of R icci flow through singularities. Acta Math. , 228(1):1--215, 2022

2022
[10]

Bamler and B

R. Bamler and B. Kleiner. Ricci flow and diffeomorphism groups of 3-manifolds. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 36(2):563--589, 2023

2023
[11]

Bamler and B

R. Bamler and B. Kleiner. Diffeomorphism groups of prime 3-manifolds. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 806:23--35, 2024

2024
[12]

Bamler and B

R. Bamler and B. Kleiner. On the multiplicity one conjecture for mean curvature flows of surfaces. arXiv:2312.02106 , 2024

2024 arXiv
[13]

Bourni, M

T. Bourni, M. Langford, and S. Lynch. Collapsing and noncollapsing in convex ancient mean curvature flow. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 801:273--305, 2023

2023
[14]

Bourni, M

T. Bourni, M. Langford, and G. Tinaglia. Ancient mean curvature flows out of polytopes. Geom. Topol. , 26(4):1849--1905, 2022

1905
[15]

Brendle and K

S. Brendle and K. Naff. Rotational symmetry of ancient solutions to the R icci flow in higher dimensions. Geom. Topol. , 27(1):153--226, 2023

2023
[16]

K. Brakke. The motion of a surface by its mean curvature , volume 20 of Mathematical Notes . Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1978

1978
[17]

S. Brendle. A sharp bound for the inscribed radius under mean curvature flow. Invent. Math. , 202(1):217--237, 2015

2015
[18]

S. Brendle. Embedded self-similar shrinkers of genus 0. Ann. of Math. (2) , 183(2):715--728, 2016

2016
[19]

S. Brendle. Ancient solutions to the R icci flow in dimension 3. Acta Math. , 225(1):1--102, 2020

2020
[20]

Bernstein and L

J. Bernstein and L. Wang. A topological property of asymptotically conical self-shrinkers of small entropy. Duke Math. J. , 166(3):403--435, 2017

2017
[21]

Chodosh, K

O. Chodosh, K. Choi, C. Mantoulidis, and F. Schulze. Mean curvature flow with generic initial data. Invent. Math. , 237(1):121--220, 2024

2024
[22]

Chodosh, K

O. Chodosh, K. Choi, C. Mantoulidis, and F. Schulze. Revisiting generic mean curvature flow in R ^3 . arXiv:2409.01463 , 2024

2024
[23]

Chodosh, K

O. Chodosh, K. Choi, and F. Schulze. Mean curvature flow with generic initial data II . arXiv:2302.08409 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[24]

B. Choi, P. Daskalopoulos, W. Du, R. Haslhofer, and N. Sesum. Classification of bubble-sheet ovals in R ^4 . Geom. Topol. (to appear)
[25]

B. Choi, R. Haslhofer, and O. Hershkovits. A note on the selfsimilarity of limit flows. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 149(3):1239--1245, 2021

2021
[26]

K. Choi, R. Haslhofer, and O. Hershkovits. Ancient low-entropy flows, mean-convex neighborhoods, and uniqueness. Acta Math. , 228(2):217--301, 2022

2022
[27]

K. Choi, R. Haslhofer, and O. Hershkovits. Classification of noncollapsed translators in R^4 . Camb. J. Math. , 11(3):563--698, 2023

2023
[28]

K. Choi, R. Haslhofer, and O. Hershkovits. A nonexistence result for wing-like mean curvature flows in R ^4 . Geom. Topol. , 28(7):3095--3134, 2024

2024
[29]

K. Choi, R. Haslhofer, O. Hershkovits, and B. White. Ancient asymptotically cylindrical flows and applications. Invent. Math. , 229(1):139--241, 2022

2022
[30]

Cheeger, R

J. Cheeger, R. Haslhofer, and A. Naber. Quantitative stratification and the regularity of mean curvature flow. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 23(3):828--847, 2013

2013
[31]

Colding and W

T. Colding and W. Minicozzi. Generic mean curvature flow I ; generic singularities. Ann. of Math. (2) , 175(2):755--833, 2012

2012
[32]

Colding and W

T. Colding and W. Minicozzi. Uniqueness of blowups and L ojasiewicz inequalities. Ann. of Math. (2) , 182(1):221--285, 2015

2015
[33]

Clutterbuck, O

J. Clutterbuck, O. Schn\" u rer, and F. Schulze. Stability of translating solutions to mean curvature flow. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 29(3):281--293, 2007

2007
[34]

Du and R

W. Du and R. Haslhofer. On uniqueness and nonuniqueness of ancient ovals. Amer. J. Math. (to appear)
[35]

Du and R

W. Du and R. Haslhofer. A nonexistence result for rotating mean curvature flows in R^4 . J. Reine Angew. Math. , 802:275--285, 2023

2023
[36]

Du and R

W. Du and R. Haslhofer. Hearing the shape of ancient noncollapsed flows in R^4 . Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 77(1):543--582, 2024

2024
[37]

Daskalopoulos and M

P. Daskalopoulos and M. Saez. Uniqueness of entire graphs evolving by mean curvature flow. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 796:201--227, 2023

2023
[38]

Hamilton

R. Hamilton. Harnack estimate for the mean curvature flow. J. Differential Geom. , 41(1):215--226, 1995

1995
[39]

Haslhofer

R. Haslhofer. Uniqueness of the bowl soliton. Geom. Topol. , 19(4):2393--2406, 2015

2015
[40]

Haslhofer

R. Haslhofer. On -solutions and canonical neighborhoods in 4d R icci flow. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 811:257--265, 2024

2024
[41]

Haslhofer and O

R. Haslhofer and O. Hershkovits. Ancient solutions of the mean curvature flow. Comm. Anal. Geom. , 24(3):593--604, 2016

2016
[42]

Haslhofer and O

R. Haslhofer and O. Hershkovits. Singularities of mean convex level set flow in general ambient manifolds. Adv. Math. , 329:1137--1155, 2018

2018
[43]

Hoffman, T

D. Hoffman, T. Ilmanen, F. Mart\' n, and B. White. Graphical translators for mean curvature flow. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 58(4):Art. 117, 29, 2019

2019
[44]

Haslhofer and B

R. Haslhofer and B. Kleiner. On B rendle's estimate for the inscribed radius under mean curvature flow. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (15):6558--6561, 2015

2015
[45]

Haslhofer and B

R. Haslhofer and B. Kleiner. Mean curvature flow of mean convex hypersurfaces. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 70(3):511--546, 2017

2017
[46]

G. Huisken. Flow by mean curvature of convex surfaces into spheres. J. Differential Geom. , 20(1):237--266, 1984

1984
[47]

Hershkovits and B

O. Hershkovits and B. White. Nonfattening of mean curvature flow at singularities of mean convex type. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 73(3):558--580, 2020

2020
[48]

T. Ilmanen. Problems in mean curvature flow. https://people.math.ethz.ch/ ilmanen/classes/eil03/problems03.ps , 2003

2003
[49]

Martin, A

F. Martin, A. Savas-Halilaj, and K. Smoczyk. On the topology of translating solitons of the mean curvature flow. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 54(3):2853--2882, 2015

2015
[50]

Merle and H

F. Merle and H. Zaag. Optimal estimates for blowup rate and behavior for nonlinear heat equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 51(2):139--196, 1998

1998
[51]

Perelman

G. Perelman. The entropy formula for the R icci flow and its geometric applications. arXiv:math/0211159 , 2002

2002 arXiv
[52]

Sheng and X

W. Sheng and X. Wang. Singularity profile in the mean curvature flow. Methods Appl. Anal. , 16(2):139--155, 2009

2009
[53]

X. Wang. Convex solutions to the mean curvature flow. Ann. of Math. (2) , 173(3):1185--1239, 2011

2011
[54]

B. White. The size of the singular set in mean curvature flow of mean convex sets. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 13(3):665--695, 2000

2000
[55]

B. White. The nature of singularities in mean curvature flow of mean-convex sets. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 16(1):123--138, 2003

2003
[56]

B. White. Subsequent singularities in mean-convex mean curvature flow. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 54(2):1457--1468, 2015

2015
[57]

J. Zhu. SO (2) symmetry of the translating solitons of the mean curvature flow in R ^4 . Ann. PDE , 8(1):6, 2022

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Angenent, S

S. Angenent, S. Brendle, P. Daskalopoulos, and N. Sesum. Unique asymptotics of compact ancient solutions to three-dimensional R icci flow. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 75(5):1032--1073, 2022

work page 2022

[2] [2]

Angenent, P

S. Angenent, P. Daskalopoulos, and N. Sesum. Unique asymptotics of ancient convex mean curvature flow solutions. J. Differential Geom. , 111(3):381--455, 2019

work page 2019

[3] [3]

Angenent, P

S. Angenent, P. Daskalopoulos, and N. Sesum. Uniqueness of two-convex closed ancient solutions to the mean curvature flow. Ann. of Math. (2) , 192(2):353--436, 2020

work page 2020

[4] [4]

B. Andrews. Noncollapsing in mean-convex mean curvature flow. Geom. Topol. , 16(3):1413--1418, 2012

work page 2012

[5] [5]

Brendle and K

S. Brendle and K. Choi. Uniqueness of convex ancient solutions to mean curvature flow in R^3 . Invent. Math. , 217(1):35--76, 2019

work page 2019

[6] [6]

Brendle and K

S. Brendle and K. Choi. Uniqueness of convex ancient solutions to mean curvature flow in higher dimensions. Geom. Topol. , 25(5):2195--2234, 2021

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Brendle, P

S. Brendle, P. Daskalopoulos, and N. Sesum. Uniqueness of compact ancient solutions to three-dimensional R icci flow. Invent. Math. , 226(2):579--651, 2021

work page 2021

[8] [8]

Bamler and B

R. Bamler and B. Kleiner. Ricci flow and contractibility of spaces of metrics. arXiv:1909.08710 , 2019

arXiv 1909