Regularity of stochastic differential equations on the Wiener space by coupling

Stefan Geiss; Xilin Zhou

Regularity of stochastic differential equations on the Wiener space by coupling

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For Hölder-continuous diffusion coefficients, Malliavin differentiability can fail while sharp Besov regularity survives.

desk verdict A genuinely new extension of the Geiss–Ylinen coupling machinery: a sharp Malliavin non-differentiability counterexample for Hölder diffusions plus matching Besov regularity bounds, worth serious refereeing despite heavy reliance on the authors' Memoirs. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10836 v2 pith:2MB3AOBJ submitted 2024-12-14 math.PR

Stefan Geiss , Xilin Zhou This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PR MSC 60H0760H1046E3546B70

keywords stochasticdifferentialequationscouplingmethodMalliavinSobolevspaceBesovspacesrealinterpolationHöldercontinuousdiffusionbackwardWiener

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks how smooth the solution of an SDE is as a function of the driving Brownian path when the diffusion coefficient is only Hölder continuous rather than Lipschitz. It proves two complementary statements with one coupling method: in the Lipschitz and path-dependent case, solutions are Malliavin differentiable and lie in real-interpolation Besov spaces; in the scalar Hölder case, Malliavin differentiability can fail even for bounded non-degenerate diffusions, yet a sharp Besov-type estimate survives. The surviving estimate, Corollary 7.11(3), controls the $L_p$ distance between the original solution and its cut-off coupled version by $(c-a)^{1/(2p)}$ plus explicit terms, and Proposition 7.12 shows the exponent $1/(2p)$ is optimal. This matters because the same Besov regularity of the forward diffusion drives the $L_p$-variation of backward SDEs, so the result extends BSDE regularity theory to non-smooth diffusions such as the CIR process.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a coupling of two Wiener spaces: fix a cut-off coupling function $\varphi=\mathbf{1}_{(a,c]}$ and replace the Brownian motion on the interval $(a,c]$ by an independent copy, with $W^{\varphi}_s=W_s$ for $s\le a$, $W^{\varphi}_s=W_a+W'_s-W'_a$ for $a<s\le c$, and $W^{\varphi}_s-W^{\varphi}_c=W_s-W_c$ afterwards. Transference operators $C_0$ and $C_T$ from [14] move random variables and predictable processes from the original Wiener space to the coupled one, preserving finite-dimensional distributions (Lemma 3.7). For the Hölder SDE, a classical regularization argument (Lemma 7.5) shows the difference $D_s=X^{t,\xi}_s-X^{t,\xi,\varphi}_s$ satisfies $|D_s|=|A|+\int_c^s \mathrm{sign}_0(D_u)\,dD_u$, leading to the domination Lemma 7.7 that bounds $\sup_s|D_s|$ by $|A|$ plus a martingale term, with the Hölder exponent $\theta\in[1/2,1)$ entering through $|\sigma|\le L_\sigma|D|^{\theta}$. The law identities (7.12)–(7.13) then convert the pathwise estimates into the $L_p$ estimates of Theorem 7.3; Proposition 7.12, based on the SDE $dX_s=|X_s|^{\theta}\,dW_s$, shows the resulting exponent $1/(2p)$ is optimal.

What would settle it

Take the explicit diffusion coefficient $\sigma_\theta(s,x)=1+\sum_{\ell\ge1}\mathbf{1}_{I_\ell}(s)S^\theta_{n_\ell}(x)$ from Theorem 6.1, with the parameters $(t_\ell)$ and $(n_\ell)$ chosen in its proof, and compute $\|X_1\|_{D_{1,2}}$ directly. If a finite Malliavin derivative exists, Theorem 6.1 is refuted; the proof's contradiction argument predicts the $D_{1,2}$ norm must be infinite.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that regularity of SDE solutions on Wiener space is governed by which coupling is used. For Lipschitz, path-dependent, random coefficients with a BMO drift, the uniform coupling $\varphi_r\equiv r$ shows that solutions belong to the Malliavin Sobolev space $D_{1,2}$ and to the real-interpolation Besov spaces $B^{\eta}_{p,q}$, with quantitative bounds. In dimension one, for a bounded diffusion coefficient $\sigma$ that is $\theta$-Hölder with $\theta\in[1/2,1)$, the same Malliavin differentiability fails: Theorem 6.1 constructs examples $\sigma_\theta(s,x)=1+\sum_\ell \mathbf{1}_{I_\ell}(s)S^{\theta}_{n_\ell}(x)$ for which $X_1\notin D_{1,2}$ for every starting point, even with zero drift. Nevertheless, using only cut-off couplings $\varphi=\mathbf{1}_{(a,c]}$, Corollary 7.11(3) gives a sharp $L_p$ estimate for the sup-norm effect of the coupling, and Proposition 7.12 shows the resulting exponent $1/(2p)$ is optimal for $p\in[3-2\theta,\infty)$. The paper's message is that Malliavin differentiability is too strong a notion for Hölder diffusions, but Besov regularity survives with the best possible rate.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the transference machinery of [14] extends to the cut-off coupling $\varphi=\mathbf{1}_{(a,c]}$ for SDEs whose diffusion coefficient is only Hölder continuous; the distributional identities (7.12)–(7.13), asserting that the transferred coefficient processes have the same law as the original ones, are what turn the pathwise estimates of Lemma 7.7 into the $L_p$ estimates of Theorem 7.3.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In the Lipschitz, path-dependent, random-coefficient setting, solutions inherit Malliavin differentiability from an $\mathcal{F}_t$-measurable starting point, with explicit bounds in terms of a fractional potential $(U,V)$ of the coefficients.
For scalar Hölder diffusions with $\theta\in[1/2,1)$, $X_T$ need not be in $D_{1,2}$; the counterexample is built from Schauder blocks and has a bounded, non-degenerate diffusion coefficient.
Corollary 7.11(3) gives a quantitative control of the cut-off coupling error in $L_p$, and for $p\in[3-2\theta,\infty)$ the leading rate is $(c-a)^{1/(2p)}$ as $c\downarrow a$.
Proposition 7.12 shows this exponent is optimal: a lower-bound example with $\sigma(x)=|x|^{\theta}$ satisfies $\|X_T-X_T^{(a,c]}\|_{L_p} \ge c_{\theta,p}(c-a)^{1/(2p)}$.
Applied to BSDEs (Corollary 9.4), the forward Besov regularity transfers to the $Y$ and $Z$ components, giving $L_p$-variation rates of order $(c-a)^{1/(2p)}$ for CIR-type forward processes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the counterexample's dyadic Schauder blocks suggest the failure of Malliavin differentiability is generic for Hölder moduli that are saturated on infinitely many scales, not an artifact of a special construction.
Editorial inference: a direct testable extension is to multidimensional systems with diagonal Hölder diffusion coefficients; the dimension should enter the cut-off coupling estimates, and the sharp exponent may become dimension-dependent.
Editorial inference: the paper leaves the boundary case $\theta=1/2$ open; determining whether the Besov estimates persist there would clarify whether the regularity threshold coincides with the pathwise-uniqueness threshold.
Editorial inference: because the Besov rate is derived from cut-off couplings, the same rate should appear as a strong-approximation error for Euler-type schemes for these diffusions; checking this numerically would be a direct test of the paper's implications.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The two things to know: this paper contains real new mathematics, and its main caveat is that the verification burden is pushed onto the authors' previous Memoirs [14]. If you are deciding whether to referee it, the answer should be yes.

The genuinely new results are Theorem 6.1, which constructs bounded uniformly Hölder diffusion coefficients for which X_1 is never in D_{1,2}, and the Besov regularity theorem Corollary 7.11 with the matching lower bound Proposition 7.12. The sharp exponent 1/(2p) for cut-off couplings is exactly the kind of result that makes the Besov-space framework credible rather than merely convenient. The Lipschitz-case extension to path-dependent random coefficients with BMO drift (Section 5) is also broader than what was previously available, and the BSDE application in Section 9 is a natural payoff. The proofs are detailed and I found no internal contradiction.

The soft spots are real but not disqualifying. The main load-bearing step is the transference identities (7.12)–(7.13), which turn pathwise estimates into Lp estimates. These rely on Proposition 3.10 being valid for merely Hölder diffusion coefficients and for the discontinuous cut-off coupling indеed. The reader's stress-test note is right: Proposition 3.10 is stated without a Lipschitz restriction and derives from [14, Theorem 3.3], but the paper does not re-prove that transference for non-smooth coefficients, so a referee needs to check that citation carefully. This is a lineage issue, not circularity, but it does make the proof "as good as [14]" in a way that is slightly unsatisfying for a standalone paper. The generalized-derivative identity in Theorem 6.1 is also used in a way that deserves a bit more justification; I could not fully verify it, though nothing suggests it is wrong. Minor textual issues in the Introduction and the direct-consequences framing of Section 9 do not affect the mathematics.

Who is this for? Anyone working on Malliavin regularity of SDEs, Besov spaces on Wiener space, or BSDE numerics that depend on Lp-variation of the forward process. A serious referee should be assigned, and the report should focus on the transference step and the generalized-derivative identity.

My recommendation: send it to a good referee. It is not a desk reject, and it is not ready for blind trust either. The referee needs time to check the [14] dependencies.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a coupling-and-transference method on the Wiener space and applies it to the regularity of stochastic differential equations. In the Lipschitz setting with random, path-dependent coefficients and a BMO drift, Theorem 5.3 gives Lp estimates for the difference between a solution and its coupled copy; Corollaries 5.11 through 5.13 then yield Malliavin differentiability and Besov regularity obtained by real interpolation. Section 6 constructs a scalar SDE with bounded, theta-Holder diffusion coefficient whose terminal value is not in D_{1,2}, for every starting point. Section 7 treats one-dimensional SDEs with theta in [1/2,1)-Holder diffusion and proves Lp estimates for cut-off couplings (Theorem 7.3, Corollary 7.11); Proposition 7.12 supplies a matching lower bound showing the exponent 1/(2p) is optimal. Section 9 applies these estimates to the Lp-variation of BSDEs, including a CIR-process example.

Significance. The paper's central two-fold message is valuable and nontrivial: general Holder diffusion coefficients can destroy Malliavin differentiability, while a sharp order of Besov-type regularity survives. The construction in Section 6 is elegant and the matching lower bound in Proposition 7.12 makes the upper estimates credible. The manuscript is also unusually explicit about its lineage: the transference machinery, Besov-space characterizations, and several BSDE estimates are imported from the authors' Memoirs [14]. The stress-test concern about the identities (7.12) and (7.13) does not land: Proposition 3.8, Remark 3.9(1), Proposition 3.10, and Lemma 3.7 are exactly the tools needed, and under Assumption 7.1 the diffusion coefficient is deterministic while the drift is Lipschitz in the state variable, so the distributional identities are justified by the stated results. The central estimates appear internally consistent and are supported by detailed proofs.

minor comments (5)

[Lemma 7.5] In the proof of Lemma 7.5, the statement that the first three terms converge in L2 is not justified under the stated assumptions: the lemma only assumes E times the integral of |b_s| ds is finite and A is in L2, and the drift term involving Phi'_n(D_u) b_u need not converge in L2 without square-integrability of the drift. The conclusion of the lemma is still correct, and in the later applications the stronger integrability with the integral of |b_s| ds in L^{p or 2} is available, so this is a local proof repair rather than a substantive gap. Please either add the needed integrability assumption to Lemma 7.5 or replace the L2-convergence statement by convergence in probability with a dominated-convergence argument for the drift term.
[Corollary 9.4, equation (9.4)] The case split in (9.4) appears to omit the range p in [2, 2/alpha) when alpha is less than 1: for example with alpha = 0.4 and p = 3, none of the three listed intervals applies. The intended division should presumably be p < 1/alpha, 1/alpha <= p < 2/alpha, and p >= 2/alpha, because Corollary 7.11 is applied with exponent alpha p. In the omitted range alpha p lies in [2 alpha, 2), and Corollary 7.11(3) gives an estimate with exponent alpha/4, which is no worse than the stated exponent 1/(2p) - epsilon; please clarify the case boundaries and the proof for that range.
[Section 1 and Section 6] There is a recurring spelling 'Cieselski' in the introduction; it should be 'Ciesielski'. Also, in the displayed constants of Section 7, expressions such as 'e^{L_b T} p^p sqrt(1-p)' are typeset ambiguously; the intended constant appears to be (p^p/(1-p))^{1/p} or similar, and should be written unambiguously.
[Definition 5.9] The displayed definition of the quantity with parameters B eta, beta, gamma has a malformed brace structure and an unclear case for the second alternative. Please rewrite the definition with separate cases so that the admissible infimum over kappa is displayed consistently with the q = infinity case.
[Section 7.1, identities (7.12) and (7.13)] In the proof of Theorem 7.3, the paper states that Proposition 3.8 and Remark 3.9(1) give the transference relations (7.12) and (7.13). This is correct, but it would improve readability to note explicitly that the transferred coefficient b^phi may be chosen to satisfy the same linear-growth and Lipschitz bounds as b, since those properties are used in the pathwise estimates immediately after the identities.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: central estimates and the counterexample are derived from external transference results and internal inequalities, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The main coupling estimate in Theorem 7.3 and Corollary 7.11 estimates the Besov-type quantity from the left; it does not define the conclusion into the assumptions, and all constants depend only on p, T, L_b, L_sigma, K_b, K_sigma, and theta. The distributional identities (7.12)-(7.13) are imported from the transference machinery of the authors' Memoirs [14]; that citation is real external evidence because [14] is a published, parameter-free construction whose stated assumptions do not include the target Malliavin-regularity results, and the paper verifies in Proposition 3.10 and Lemma 3.7 that the machinery applies to merely Holder continuous deterministic sigma and the cut-off coupling 1_(a,c]. The counterexample in Theorem 6.1 chooses the parameters (n_l) after fixing the interval lengths so that the lower bound contradicts a D_{1,2} bound; this is an existence argument, not a fitted prediction. Proposition 7.12 uses a comparison theorem and a separate moment estimate to prove optimality of the exponent 1/(2p); it does not assume what it proves. Section 9 explicitly identifies Theorems 9.2-9.3 as direct consequences of [14], which is honest lineage rather than hidden circularity. No load-bearing claim reduces to a self-citation chain, and no known result is merely renamed.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a continuation of the same authors' Memoirs [14], so many building blocks are inherited from that work. The new content is the application to path-dependent SDEs, the Holder counterexample, and the single-scale sharp estimates; the ledger shows the central claim rests on [14]'s transference and interpolation theorems, plus standard Malliavin calculus.

free parameters (1)

Sequence n_l in Theorem 6.1 = Chosen so that 2^{2(n_l+1)(1-theta)} |I_l|^2 / 8 tends to infinity
This parameter choice is needed to make the counterexample work: the authors first choose intervals (t_l) and then pick n_l so the Malliavin derivative lower bound diverges, contradicting D1,2 membership.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Existence of the isometric transference operators C0 and CT and properties (P1)-(P3) from [14, Chapter 3]
The coupling construction at the heart of Sections 3-7 is taken from the authors' prior Memoirs [14]; the present paper adapts but does not reprove the core transference theorem.
domain assumption Equivalence of the Besov spaces B^Phi_p with real interpolation spaces B^eta_{p,q} and with D1,2 characterizations ([14, Theorems 4.16 and 4.22])
Used in Section 5 and Section 9 to identify the spaces obtained by coupling with classical function spaces.
domain assumption Fefferman's inequality in BMO(S2) (Lemma 2.5, from [14, Corollary 5.19])
Allows replacing uniform Lipschitz drift by BMO(S2) condition in Assumption 5.1; this inequality is cited, not reproved.
standard math Malliavin calculus chain rule and integration-by-parts identities from Nualart [30, Propositions 1.2.4, 1.3.1, Lemma 1.3.4]
Used in Section 6 to derive D sigma_theta(s,X_s) = (DX_s)G(s,X_s) and the identity (6.3).
domain assumption Well-posedness of one-dimensional SDEs with Holder drift/diffusion, pathwise uniqueness, and Euler approximations from [17,20,15,36]
Section 7 relies on Yamada-Watanabe-type uniqueness and on the Gyongy-Rasonyi estimates for Holder diffusion coefficients, plus the comparison theorem for the lower bound.
standard math Stochastic calculus facts: BDG inequalities (2.4), Lenglart's inequality, Gronwall lemma
Used throughout proofs of Theorems 5.3 and 7.3.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Regularity of stochastic differential equations on the Wiener space by coupling." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2MB3AOBJ

@misc{pith2026241210836,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Regularity of stochastic differential equations on the Wiener space by coupling},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2MB3AOBJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10836}
}

abstract

Using the coupling method introduced in \cite{Geiss:Ylinen:21}, we investigate regularity properties of stochastic differential equations, where we consider the Lipschitz case in $\R^d$ and allow for H\"older continuity of the diffusion coefficient of scalar valued stochastic differential equations. Two cases of the coupling method are of special interest: The uniform coupling to treat the Malliavin Sobolev space $\D_{1,2}$ and real interpolation spaces, and secondly a cut-off coupling to treat the $L_p$-variation of backward stochastic differential equations where the forward process is the investigated stochastic differential equation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Coupling of forward-backward stochastic differential equations on the Wiener space, and application on regularity
math.PR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A coupling variance estimate for fully coupled FBSDEs on the Wiener space yields time regularity and D^{1,2} Malliavin differentiability of solutions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[14]

Geiss and J

S. Geiss and J. Ylinen, Decoupling on the Wiener space, re lated Besov spaces, and applica- tions to BSDEs, Memoirs AMS 1335, 2021

work page 2021
[1]

Al` os and C.-O

E. Al` os and C.-O. Ewald, Malliavin diﬀerentiability of t he Heston volatility and applications to option pricing, Adv. Appl. Prob. 40(2008)144–162

work page 2008
[2]

Banos, S

D.-R. Banos, S. Duedahl, T. Meyer-Brandis and F. Proske, C onstruction of Malliavin diﬀer- entiable strong solutions of SDEs under an integrability co ndition on the drift without the Yamada– W atanabe principle, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist. 54(2018)1464–1491

work page 2018
[3]

Bennet and R

C. Bennet and R. Sharpley, Interpolation of operators, Ac ademic Press, 1988

work page 1988
[4]

Bergh and J

J. Bergh and J. L¨ ofstr¨ om, Interpolation Spaces, Springer, 1976. COUPLING OF SDES 43

work page 1976
[5]

Cheng, Z

M. Cheng, Z. Hao and M. R¨ ockner, Strong and weak convergen ce for the averaging principle of DDSDE with singular drift, Bernoulli 30(2024)1586–1610

work page 2024
[6]

Ciesielski, On the isomorphisms of the space Hα and m, Bull

Z. Ciesielski, On the isomorphisms of the space Hα and m, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S´ er. Sci. Math. Astr. Phys. 8(1960)217–222

work page 1960
[7]

Worst-Case Optimal Investment in Incomplete Markets

S. Desmettre, S. Merkel, A. Mickel and A. Steinicke, W orst -case optimal investment in incomplete markets, arXiv:2311.10021

work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 50 references

[8]

Do, H.-L

M.-T. Do, H.-L. Ngo and N.-A. Pho, Tamed-adaptive Euler-M aruyama approximation for SDEs with superlinearly growing and piecewise continuous d rift, superlinearly growing and locally H¨ older continuous diﬀusion, Journal of Complexit y 82(2024)101833

2024
[9]

Fang and T

S. Fang and T. Zhang, A study of a class of stochastic diﬀere ntial equations with non- Lipschitzian coeﬃcients, Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 132(2 005)356–390
[10]

Geiss and A

C. Geiss and A. Steinicke, L2-variation of L´ evy driven BSDEs with non-smooth terminal conditions, Bernoulli 22(2016)995–1025

2016
[11]

Scheutzow, Sharpness of Lenglart’s do mination inequality and a sharp monotone version, Electron

Sarah Geiss and M. Scheutzow, Sharpness of Lenglart’s do mination inequality and a sharp monotone version, Electron. Commun. Probab. 26(2021), art icle no. 44, 1–8

2021
[12]

Geiss, S

C. Geiss, S. Geiss and E. Gobet, Generalized fractional s moothness and Lp-variation of BSDEs with non-Lipschitz terminal condition, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 122(2012)2078–2116

2012
[13]

Geiss and A

S. Geiss and A. Toivola, On fractional smoothness and Lp-approximation on the Gaussian space, Ann. Probab. 43(2015)605–638

2015
[15]

Gy¨ ongy and M

I. Gy¨ ongy and M. R´ asonyi, A note on Euler approximations for SDEs with H ¨lder continuous diﬀusion coeﬃcients, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 121(2011)2189–22 00

2011
[16]

Hirsch, Lipschitz functions and fractional Sobolev s paces, Potential Anal

F. Hirsch, Lipschitz functions and fractional Sobolev s paces, Potential Anal. 11(1999)415– 429

1999
[17]

Ikeda and S

N. Ikeda and S. W atamabe, Stochastic Diﬀerential Equati ons and Diﬀusion Processes, North- Holland, 1989

1989
[18]

Imkeller, R

P. Imkeller, R. Likibi Pellat and O. Menoukeu-Pamen, Diﬀ erentiability of quadratic forward- backward SDEs with rough drift, Ann. Applied Prob. 34(2024) 4758–4798

2024
[19]

Imkeller, G

P. Imkeller, G. dos Reis and W. Salkeld, Diﬀerentiabilit y of SDEs with drifts of super-linear growth, Electron. J. Probab. 24(2019)1–43

2019
[20]

Karatzas and S.E

I. Karatzas and S.E. Shreve, Brownian Motion and Stochas tic Calculus Second Edition, Springer, 1998

1998
[21]

Krylov, Introduction to the Theory of Diﬀusion Proc esses, American Mathematical Society, 1994

N.V. Krylov, Introduction to the Theory of Diﬀusion Proc esses, American Mathematical Society, 1994

1994
[22]

Krylov and M

N.V. Krylov and M. R¨ ockner, Strong solutions of stochas tic equations with singular time dependent drift, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 131(2005)15 4–196

2005
[23]

Lan and J.-L

G. Lan and J.-L. W u, New suﬃcient conditions of existence , moment estimations and non conﬂuence for SDEs with non-Lipschitzian coeﬃcients, Stoc h. Proc. Appl. 124(2014)4030– 4049

2014
[24]

K. Lee, S. Lim and H. Park, Option pricing under path-depe ndent stock models, arXiv: 2211.10953, 2023

2023 arXiv
[25]

´Erik Lenglart, Relation de domination entre deux processus , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Sect. B 13(1977)171–179

1977
[26]

Lionnet, G

A. Lionnet, G. dos Reis and L. Szpruch, Time discretizati on of FBSDE with polynomial growth drivers and reaction–diﬀusion PDEs, Annals of Appli ed Probability 25(2015)2563– 2625

2015
[27]

Marinelli and M

C. Marinelli and M. R¨ ockner, On the maximal inequalitie s of Burkholder, Davis and Gundy, Expo. Math. 34(2016)1–26

2016
[28]

Menoukeu-Pamen, T

O. Menoukeu-Pamen, T. Meyer-Brandis, T. Nilssen, F. Pro ske and T. Zhang, A variational approach to the construction and Malliavin diﬀerentiabili ty of strong solutions of SDE’s, Mathematische Annalen 357(2013)761–799

2013
[29]

M¨ uller-Gronbach and L

T. M¨ uller-Gronbach and L. Yaroslavtseva, On the comple xity of strong approximation of stochastic diﬀerential equations with a non-Lipschitz dri ft coeﬃcient, Journal of Complexity 85(2024)101870

2024
[30]

Nualart, The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics, S pringer, 2006

D. Nualart, The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics, S pringer, 2006

2006
[31]

de Raynal, Strong existence and uniqueness for de generate SDE with H¨ older drift, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e 53(2017)259–286

P.E.C. de Raynal, Strong existence and uniqueness for de generate SDE with H¨ older drift, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e 53(2017)259–286

2017
[32]

dos Reis and Z

G. dos Reis and Z. Wilde, Malliavin diﬀerentiability of M cKean-Vlasov SDEs with locally Lipschitz coeﬃcients, Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de M atem´ atica, 2024

2024
[33]

Ren and X

J. Ren and X. Zhang, Stochastic ﬂows for SDEs with non-Lip schitz coeﬃcients. Bull. Sci. math. 127(2003)739–754. 44 STEF AN GEISS AND XILIN ZHOU

2003
[34]

Ren and X

J. Ren and X. Zhang, Continuity modulus of stochastic hom eomorphism ﬂows for SDEs with non-Lipschitz coeﬃcients, J. Funct. Anal. 241(2006)439–4 56

2006
[35]

Ren and H

J. Ren and H. Zhang, One-dimensional SDEs with LPS-type s ingular drift coeﬃcients and H¨ older continuous diﬀusion coeﬃcients, J. Math. Anal. App l. 536(2024), no.1, Paper No. 128166

2024
[36]

Revuz and M

D. Revuz and M. Yor, Continuous martingales and Brownian motion, third ed., Springer, 1999

1999
[37]

Rogers and D

L.C.G. Rogers and D. Williams, Diﬀusions, Markov proces ses and martingales, Cambridge University Press, 2000

2000
[38]

Mohammed, T.-K

S.-E.A. Mohammed, T.-K. Nilssen and F.-N. Proske, Sobol ev diﬀerentiable stochastic ﬂows for SDEs with singular coeﬃcients: Applications to the tran sport equation, Ann. Probab. 43(2015)1535–1576

2015
[39]

Stroock and S.R.S

D.W. Stroock and S.R.S. Varadhan, Multidimensional Diﬀ usion Processes, Springer, 1997

1997
[40]

Swart, A 2-dimensional SDE whose solutions are not u nique, Elect

J.M. Swart, A 2-dimensional SDE whose solutions are not u nique, Elect. Comm. in Probab. 6, 2001

2001
[41]

Veretennikov, On strong solutions and explicit fo rmulas for solutions of stochastic integral equations, Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik 39(19 81)387–403

A.Yu. Veretennikov, On strong solutions and explicit fo rmulas for solutions of stochastic integral equations, Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik 39(19 81)387–403
[42]

W ang and X

F.-Y. W ang and X. Zhang, Degenerate SDE with H¨ older-Din i drift and non-Lipschitz noise coeﬃcient, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 48(2015) 2189–2226

2015
[43]

W ang and X

Z. W ang and X. Zhang, Existence and uniqueness of degener ate SDEs with H¨ older diﬀusion and measurable drift, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 484(2020)123679

2020
[44]

W atanabe and T

S. W atanabe and T. Yamada, On the uniqueness of solutions of stochastic diﬀerential equa- tions II, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 11, 1971

1971
[45]

P. Xia, L. Xie, X. Zhang and G. Zhao, Lq(Lp)-theory of stochastic diﬀerential equations, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 130(2020)5188–5211

2020
[46]

Xie and X

L. Xie and X. Zhang, Sobolev diﬀerentiable ﬂows of SDEs wi th local Sobolev and super-linear growth coeﬃcients, Ann. Probab. 44(6)(2016)3661–3687

2016
[47]

Zhang and C

S.Q. Zhang and C. Yuan, A Zvonkin’s transformation for st ochastic diﬀerential equations with singular drift and applications, Journal Diﬀ. Equatio ns 297(2021)277–319

2021
[48]

Zhang, Homeomorphic ﬂows for multi-dimensional SDEs with non-Lipschitz coeﬃcients, Stoch

X. Zhang, Homeomorphic ﬂows for multi-dimensional SDEs with non-Lipschitz coeﬃcients, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 115(2005)435–448

2005
[49]

Zhang, Stochastic diﬀerential equations with Sobole v diﬀusion and singular drift and applications, Ann

X. Zhang, Stochastic diﬀerential equations with Sobole v diﬀusion and singular drift and applications, Ann. Appl. Prob. 26(2016)2697–2732

2016
[50]

Zvonkin, A transformation of the phase space of a diﬀ usion process that removes the drift, Math

A.K. Zvonkin, A transformation of the phase space of a diﬀ usion process that removes the drift, Math. USSR Sb. 22(1974)129–149. Acknowledgement We thank Hannah Geiss for the careful reading of the manuscript a nd her comments that improved the manuscript. Department of Mathem...

1974

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [14]

Geiss and J

S. Geiss and J. Ylinen, Decoupling on the Wiener space, re lated Besov spaces, and applica- tions to BSDEs, Memoirs AMS 1335, 2021

work page 2021

[2] [1]

Al` os and C.-O

E. Al` os and C.-O. Ewald, Malliavin diﬀerentiability of t he Heston volatility and applications to option pricing, Adv. Appl. Prob. 40(2008)144–162

work page 2008

[3] [2]

Banos, S

D.-R. Banos, S. Duedahl, T. Meyer-Brandis and F. Proske, C onstruction of Malliavin diﬀer- entiable strong solutions of SDEs under an integrability co ndition on the drift without the Yamada– W atanabe principle, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist. 54(2018)1464–1491

work page 2018

[4] [3]

Bennet and R

C. Bennet and R. Sharpley, Interpolation of operators, Ac ademic Press, 1988

work page 1988

[5] [4]

Bergh and J

J. Bergh and J. L¨ ofstr¨ om, Interpolation Spaces, Springer, 1976. COUPLING OF SDES 43

work page 1976

[6] [5]

Cheng, Z

M. Cheng, Z. Hao and M. R¨ ockner, Strong and weak convergen ce for the averaging principle of DDSDE with singular drift, Bernoulli 30(2024)1586–1610

work page 2024

[7] [6]

Ciesielski, On the isomorphisms of the space Hα and m, Bull

Z. Ciesielski, On the isomorphisms of the space Hα and m, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. S´ er. Sci. Math. Astr. Phys. 8(1960)217–222

work page 1960

[8] [7]

Worst-Case Optimal Investment in Incomplete Markets

S. Desmettre, S. Merkel, A. Mickel and A. Steinicke, W orst -case optimal investment in incomplete markets, arXiv:2311.10021

work page Pith review arXiv