Simplified Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Biharmonic Equations on Non-Convex Polytopal Meshes

Chunmei Wang

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 42 references

Simplified Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Biharmonic Equations on Non-Convex Polytopal Meshes

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a stabilizer-free weak Galerkin method for the biharmonic equation achieves optimal H^2 and L^2 convergence on both convex and non-convex polytopal meshes, using bubble functions instead of stabilization terms.

desk verdict Off-by-one degree error in Lemma 4.4 invalidates the central norm equivalence as written, but the fix is straightforward and the paper deserves a refereed revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11315 v1 pith:YU3QHLD6 submitted 2024-12-15 math.NA cs.NA

Chunmei Wang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.NAcs.NA MSC 65N3065N1565N1265N20

keywords weakGalerkinbiharmonicequationstabilizer-freenon-convexpolytopalmeshesbubblefunctionsoptimalerrorestimatessecond-orderpartialderivativediscreteH2norm

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish that a simplified weak Galerkin (WG) finite element method can solve the biharmonic equation on polytopal meshes without any stabilization terms, even when the mesh elements are non-convex. It claims optimal-order error estimates in both the discrete $H^{2}$ norm and the $L^{2}$ norm, extending an earlier stabilizer-free WG scheme that was limited to convex polytopal meshes. The argument replaces stabilizers with higher-degree polynomials in the discrete weak second-order derivative and uses bubble functions as the analytical tool. If the claims hold, the method is symmetric, positive definite, and simpler to program while preserving the sparsity of the stiffness matrix.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the discrete weak second-order partial derivative $\$partial^{2}$_{ij,w,r,T}$, defined on each element by the integration-by-parts identity $(\$partial^{2}$_{ij,w} v, \phi)_T = (v_0, \$partial^{2}$_{ji}\phi)_T - \langle v_b n_i, \partial_j \phi\rangle_{\partial T} + \langle v_{g i}, \phi n_j\rangle_{\partial T}$ for all $\phi \in P_r(T)$. On a non-convex polytopal element with $N$ edges, the paper sets $r = 2N + k - 2$ and builds a full bubble function $\Phi_B = \prod_{i=1}^N $l_i^{2}$$, which vanishes on $\partial T$, together with edge bubbles $\varphi_{e_k} = \prod_{i \ne k} $l_i^{2}$$. These bubbles convert boundary jump terms into interior norms and yield the two-sided bound $C_1 \|v\|_{2,h} \le \left|\left|\left|v\right|\right|\right| \le C_2 \|v\|_{2,h}$. That norm equivalence is what carries both the uniqueness proof and the optimal $$H^{2}$$ and $$L^{2}$$ error estimates.

What would settle it

Check the degree of $(v_b - v_0) l_k \varphi_{e_k}$ on a pentagon with $k=2$: if it exceeds $r = 2N + k - 2$, identity (4.10) does not follow from (2.2). One could then verify (4.10) numerically on a single non-convex element, or run the scheme on an L-shaped domain and compare the observed discrete $$H^{2}$$ error rate with the claimed $$h^{{k-1}}$$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, for the biharmonic equation with Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions, the WG scheme defined by $(\$partial^{2}$_w u_h, \$partial^{2}$_w v) = (f, v_0)$ with no stabilization term has a unique solution and satisfies $\left|\left|\left|u - u_h\right|\right|\right| \le C $h^{{k-1}}$ \|u\|_{k+1}$ and $\|e_0\| \le C $h^{{k+1}}$ \|u\|_{k+1}$, provided the discrete weak second-order partial derivative is computed in a polynomial space of degree $r = 2N + k - 2$ on an $N$-edge element. The proof obtains these rates by establishing a norm equivalence between the WG energy norm and a discrete $$H^{2}$$ norm, with bubble functions providing the needed lower bound on the boundary jump terms.

Load-bearing premise

In Lemma 4.4, the proof assumes that the edge bubble test function $(v_b - v_0) l_k \varphi_{e_k}$ is a polynomial of degree at most $r = 2N + k - 2$ in each $N$-edge element, so that the defining identity for the discrete weak derivative applies; a direct degree count gives one degree higher, so the key boundary identity (4.10) is not justified as written.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Stabilizer-free WG schemes become available on general polytopal meshes, so non-convex cells need no special treatment at the discretization stage.
The method is symmetric and positive definite, preserving the size and global sparsity of the stiffness matrix while removing the usual stabilization parameters.
The claimed convergence rates $O(h^{k-1})$ in the discrete $H^2$ norm and $O(h^{k+1})$ in $L^2$ are optimal for polynomial degree $k$, with the analysis stated to extend to $d \ge 3$ dimensions.
The bubble-function technique gives a template for proving norm equivalence in other stabilizer-free weak Galerkin schemes for fourth-order problems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the degree-count issue in the bubble test function were repaired by raising $r$ or choosing another bubble, the same error equation would still give the claimed rates, so the numerical convergence is likely robust even though the written proof has a gap.
The edge bubble construction could be reused to build stabilizer-free WG methods for other fourth-order operators such as the plate equation with variable coefficients, where boundary terms require the same kind of control.
A direct numerical test on a single non-convex element, measuring the discrete $H^2$ error against $h^{k-1}$ for $k=2,3$, would settle whether the claimed rates hold in practice independent of the proof details.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a plausible extension of Xiu and Zhang's stabilizer-free WG method to non-convex polytopal meshes, and the bubble-function analysis is mostly standard. The paper's main theorems, however, rest on a norm-equivalence lemma whose proof contains a concrete degree mismatch. The test function φ=(v_b−v0)l_kφ_{e_k} has degree 2N+k−1, while the discrete weak derivative is defined only against P_r with r=2N+k−2, so (2.2) cannot be applied. That makes (4.10) and the lower bound of (4.9) unjustified. The reader's rejection on those grounds is fair.

But I don't think this is a fatal or even deep flaw. The stress-test note is right: setting r=2N+k−1 makes the argument go through. Lemma 4.1's test function Φ_B∂²_ij v0 then has degree 2N+k−2 ≤ r, and all the projection estimates in Section 6 still hold for the larger r. So the paper is an off-by-one parameter error away from being correct. That said, the error is load-bearing: uniqueness, H² error, and L² error all invoke (4.9). As written, the proofs do not establish the stated theorems.

What is genuinely new? The method itself—using squared bubble functions to handle non-convexity in a stabilizer-free WG scheme—is a reasonable incremental step beyond [42]. The implementation is simplified compared to stabilizer-based methods, and the analysis framework follows the author's established toolbox. I do think the introduction should acknowledge the overlap with the author's own [23], which appears to target the same setting; that is a citation and presentation issue, not a mathematical one.

This paper is for readers working on weak Galerkin methods for fourth-order problems on polytopal meshes. They will find the technique useful once the r parameter is corrected. It deserves a serious referee, but only after revision. I would not desk-reject it; I would send it out with a request to fix the degree count and rerun the proofs, and to clarify the relationship to [23].

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a stabilizer-free weak Galerkin (WG) finite element method for the biharmonic equation on polytopal meshes without a convexity restriction. The discrete weak second-order derivative is computed with polynomial degree r = 2N + k - 2 on an N-edge element, and bubble-function arguments are used to prove a norm equivalence between the WG energy and a discrete H^2 norm. On this basis the paper claims existence, uniqueness, and optimal-order error estimates in the discrete H^2 norm and in L^2, thereby extending the stabilizer-free WG framework of Xiu and Zhang [42] to non-convex polytopal meshes.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper would provide a useful extension of stabilizer-free WG methods: it removes the convexity restriction, keeps the scheme symmetric and positive definite, and avoids stabilizers. The constructive bubble-function strategy is transparent, and the claimed optimal rates are concrete and falsifiable. The main caveat is that the key norm-equivalence lemma contains a genuine degree mismatch as written, so the central estimates are not yet supported; however, the defect appears to be a locally repairable off-by-one error rather than a demonstrated counterexample. The paper would also be stronger if its proof were self-contained with respect to the extension lemmas currently delegated to the author's arXiv preprint [23].

major comments (3)

[Section 4, Lemma 4.4 (Eq. (4.10))] The admissible test-function space for identity (2.2) is P_r(T) with r = 2N + k - 2, but the function phi = (v_b - v_0) l_k phi_{e_k} has degree at most 2N - 1 + k = 2N + k - 1, because l_k is linear, phi_{e_k} has degree 2N - 2, and v_b - v_0 is generically of degree k. Thus (2.2) cannot be applied to this phi, and the displayed identity (4.10) is unjustified. Consequently the bounds (4.11) and the lower half of the norm equivalence (4.9) are not established; since (4.9) underpins the uniqueness proof in Theorem 4.5, the H^2 error estimate in Theorem 6.3, and the L^2 estimate in Theorem 7.1, the main results are unsupported as written. The defect appears repairable: setting r = 2N + k - 1 makes phi admissible, keeps Lemma 4.1 valid (the test function Phi_B partial^2_{ij} v_0 has degree 2N + k - 2), and only improves the Q_r projection estimates.
[Section 4, Lemma 4.4 and Lemma 4.2] The proof relies on extending v_b and the trace of v_0 from e_k to the element T and on Lemma 4.2, but Lemma 4.2 and the extension construction are attributed to the author's arXiv preprint [23], while Lemma 4.3 in this paper only describes the extension of v_g. Since the inequality (4.7) and the extension properties are load-bearing for (4.11), the paper is not self-contained. The revision should include these proofs or cite a peer-reviewed version containing them.
[Section 6, Lemma 6.2] In bounding the terms ||(Q_0 u - Q_b u) n_i||_{partial T} and ||partial_i(Q_0 u) - Q_n(partial_i u)||_{partial T}, the proof passes directly to estimates involving u - Q_0 u on T. This omits the edge projection errors u - Q_b u and partial_i u - Q_n(partial_i u); a trace-plus-approximation argument for Q_b and Q_n is needed to obtain the factor h^{k-1} in (6.3). The missing step is standard and fixable, but as written the proof of (6.3), which is used in Theorems 6.3 and 7.1, is incomplete.

minor comments (2)

[Section 4, Lemma 4.4] The same symbol v_0 is used for the original interior polynomial and for its edge-trace extension, which makes the substitution into (2.2) ambiguous; please use a separate notation such as tilde{v}_0 for the extension.
[Equation (4.10)] The boundary contribution is displayed as +C h_T^{-1} int |v_b - v_0|^2 phi_{e_k} ds, whereas a direct calculation gives the signed term -h_T^{-1} n_i n_j int |v_b - v_0|^2 phi_{e_k} ds; the proof should take absolute values or specify the sum over i,j.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Load-bearing norm-equivalence lemmas are deferred to the author's own preprint [23], but the central error estimates are otherwise derived, not assumed.

self citation load bearing [Section 4, Lemmas 4.2 and 4.3; used in Lemma 4.4, Theorem 4.5, Theorem 6.3, and Theorem 7.1]
"Lemma 4.2. [23] For {v0, vb, vg} ∈ Vh, let ϕ = (vb − v0)lkϕek. The following inequality holds: (4.7) ‖ϕ‖2 T ≤ ChT ∫ ek (vb − v0)2ds. ... The extension preserves the polynomial nature of vg as demonstrated in [23]."

The norm equivalence (4.9) is the backbone of the paper: Theorem 4.5 uses it for uniqueness, Theorem 6.3 uses it to convert ||v||_{2,h} into |||v||| in (6.5)-(6.6), and Theorem 7.1 uses it in (7.9). To prove the lower bound in (4.9), Lemma 4.4 needs Lemmas 4.2 and 4.3, which bound volume integrals of (v_b - v_0) and (v_gi - ∂_i v_0) by edge integrals. These lemmas carry no proof in the present paper; they are attributed to [23], an arXiv preprint by the same author. The cited preprint is therefore load-bearing and is not independent, machine-checked, or reproduced evidence. This is a self-citation gap, not a reduction of the theorem to its own definition; the subsequent a priori estimates are still derived rather than assumed.

full rationale

The paper contains no fitted parameters, no data-driven predictions, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern; the WG scheme and its error analysis are conventional a priori derivations. The only circularity-adjacent issue is the reliance of Section 4 on the author's own earlier preprint [23]. Lemmas 4.2 and 4.3 are cited, not proved, and they are used to establish the norm equivalence (4.9) that later supports uniqueness and the H2 and L2 error estimates. Because [23] is a single-author preprint by the same author, this step does not have the independent evidentiary status of a machine-checked or externally reproduced proof. Nevertheless, the main estimates do not reduce to the theorem statement by construction: the discrete weak derivative, the bubble-function arguments, the error equation, and the duality argument are all carried out in this manuscript. A separate off-by-one concern appears in Lemma 4.4, where the test function φ = (v_b - v_0)l_k φ_{e_k} has degree 2N + k - 1 while r = 2N + k - 2; that would invalidate the displayed equality (4.10) as written. This is a correctness/consistency defect, not a circularity, because the proof does not assume the target error estimate. Overall, the derivation chain has a load-bearing self-citation but no definitional circularity, so score 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central estimate relies on a norm-equivalence lemma whose proof imports a lemma from the author's own [23] and uses a bubble test function with a degree mismatch against the chosen r. The regularity assumptions are standard for this type of a priori error analysis.

free parameters (1)

r (discrete weak derivative degree) = 2N + k - 2
Chosen by hand to make Lemma 4.1 work; however Lemma 4.4 needs degree 2N + k - 1, causing a mismatch.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Shape regularity of the polytopal partition T_h
Used for trace and inverse inequalities; standard in WG analysis.
ad hoc to paper Lemma 4.2 from [23]
Imported from the author's own arXiv paper; essential for bounding the bubble test function in Lemma 4.4.
ad hoc to paper Lemma 4.3 from [23] (edge-to-element polynomial extension)
Imported extension property; used to define test functions and bound their L2 norms.
domain assumption H4-regularity of the dual problem (7.2)
Needed for the duality argument in Theorem 7.1.
standard math Domain inverse inequality with bubble weight (4.6)
Weighted norm equivalence for polynomials; constant may depend on the polytope geometry.
domain assumption Regularity of the exact solution u in H^{k+1}
Standard regularity assumption for the stated error estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Simplified Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Biharmonic Equations on Non-Convex Polytopal Meshes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YU3QHLD6

@misc{pith2026241211315,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Simplified Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Biharmonic Equations on Non-Convex Polytopal Meshes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YU3QHLD6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11315}
}

abstract

This paper presents a simplified weak Galerkin (WG) finite element method for solving biharmonic equations avoiding the use of traditional stabilizers. The proposed WG method supports both convex and non-convex polytopal elements in finite element partitions, utilizing bubble functions as a critical analytical tool. The simplified WG method is symmetric and positive definite. Optimal-order error estimates are established for WG approximations in both the discrete $H^2$ norm and the $L^2$ norm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

[42]

Xiu and S

Y. Xiu and S. Zhang , A stabilizer free weak Galerkin ﬁnite element method for the bihar- monic equation on polytopal meshes , SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol 58, No. 5, pp. 2572-2588, 2020. Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, Gainesvi lle, FL 32611, USA. Email address : chunmei.wang@ufl.edu

work page 2020
[23]

W ang, Auto-Stabilized Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for B iharmonic Equations on Polytopal Meshes without Convexity Assumptions , arXiv:2409.05887

C. W ang, Auto-Stabilized Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for B iharmonic Equations on Polytopal Meshes without Convexity Assumptions , arXiv:2409.05887

arXiv
[1]

W. Cao, C. W ang and J. W ang , An Lp-Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Method for div-curl Systems, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 42 2, 114881, 2023

work page 2023
[2]

W. Cao, C. W ang and J. W ang, An Lp-Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Method for Convection- Diﬀusion Equations , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 41 9, 114698, 2023

work page 2023
[3]

W. Cao, C. W ang and J. W ang , A New Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Method for Elliptic Interface Problems with Low Regularity Assumptions , Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 470, 111538, 2022

work page 2022
[4]

S. Cao, C. W ang and J. W ang , A new numerical method for div-curl Systems with Low Regularity Assumptions, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 144, pp . 47-59, 2022

work page 2022
[5]

Cao and C

W. Cao and C. W ang , New Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Convection-Diﬀusion Problems , Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 162, pp. 171-191, 202 1

work page
[6]

D. Li, Y. Nie, and C. W ang , Superconvergence of Numerical Gradient for Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods on Nonuniform Cartesian Partitions in Three Dimensions , Com- puters and Mathematics with Applications, vol 78(3), pp. 90 5-928, 2019

work page 2019

Show all 42 references

[7]

D. Li, C. W ang and J. W ang , An Extension of the Morley Element on General Polytopal Partitions Using Weak Galerkin Methods , Journal of Scientiﬁc Computing, 100, vol 27, 2024

2024
[8]

D. Li, C. W ang and S. Zhang , Weak Galerkin methods for elliptic interface problems on curved polygonal partitions, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, pp. 115 995, 2024

2024
[9]

D. Li, C. W ang, J. W ang and X. Ye , Generalized weak Galerkin ﬁnite element methods for second order elliptic problems , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 445, pp. 115833, 2024

2024
[10]

D. Li, C. W ang, J. W ang and S. Zhang , High Order Morley Elements for Biharmonic Equations on Polytopal Partitions , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 443, pp. 115757, 2024

2024
[11]

D. Li, C. W ang and J. W ang , Curved Elements in Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods , Computers and Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 153, pp. 20-32, 2024

2024
[12]

D. Li, C. W ang and J. W ang , Generalized Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Bi- harmonic Equations , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 43 4, 115353, 2023

2023
[13]

D. Li, C. W ang and J. W ang , An Lp-primal-dual ﬁnite element method for ﬁrst-order transport problems, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 43 4, 115345, 2023

2023
[14]

Li and C

D. Li and C. W ang , A simpliﬁed primal-dual weak Galerkin ﬁnite element method for Fokker-Planck type equations , Journal of Numerical Methods for Partial Diﬀerential Equa - tions, vol 39, pp. 3942-3963, 2023

2023
[15]

D. Li, C. W ang and J. W ang , Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Transport Equations in Non-Divergence Form , Journal of Computational and Applied Math- ematics, vol. 412, 114313, 2022

2022
[16]

D. Li, C. W ang, and J. W ang , Superconvergence of the Gradient Approximation for Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods on Rectangular Partitions , Applied Numerical Mathemat- ics, vol. 150, pp. 396-417, 2020

2020
[17]

B. Li, X. Xie and S. Zhang , BPS preconditioners for a weak Galerkin ﬁnite element metho d for 2D diﬀusion problems with strongly discontinuous coeﬃc ients, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 76(4), pp.701-724, 2018. 18 CHUNMEI W ANG

2018
[18]

W ang, A Preconditioner for the FETI-DP Method for Mortar-Type Cro uzeix-Raviart Element Discretization , Applications of Mathematics, Vol

C. W ang, A Preconditioner for the FETI-DP Method for Mortar-Type Cro uzeix-Raviart Element Discretization , Applications of Mathematics, Vol. 59, 6, pp. 653-672, 2014

2014
[19]

W ang, New Discretization Schemes for Time-Harmonic Maxwell Equa tions by Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol

C. W ang, New Discretization Schemes for Time-Harmonic Maxwell Equa tions by Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 341, pp. 127-143, 2018

2018
[20]

W ang, Low Regularity Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Me thods for Ill-Posed Elliptic Cauchy Problems , Int

C. W ang, Low Regularity Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Me thods for Ill-Posed Elliptic Cauchy Problems , Int. J. Numer. Anal. Mod., vol. 19(1), pp. 33-51, 2022

2022
[21]

W ang, A Modiﬁed Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Method f or Second Order Elliptic Equations in Non-Divergence Form , Int

C. W ang, A Modiﬁed Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Method f or Second Order Elliptic Equations in Non-Divergence Form , Int. J. Numer. Anal. Mod., vol. 18(4), pp. 500- 523, 2021

2021
[22]

W ang, A New Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Method for Il l-posed Elliptic Cauchy Problems , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol 371 , 112629, 2020

C. W ang, A New Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Method for Il l-posed Elliptic Cauchy Problems , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol 371 , 112629, 2020

2020
[24]

W ang and J

C. W ang and J. W ang, A Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Method for Fokke r- Planck Type Equations , SIAM Numerical Analysis, vol. 58(5), pp. 2632-2661, 2020

2020
[25]

W ang and J

C. W ang and J. W ang , A Primal-Dual Finite Element Method for First-Order Transp ort Problems, Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 417, 109571, 2020

2020
[26]

W ang and J

C. W ang and J. W ang , Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Ellip tic Cauchy Problems , Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol 79(3), p p. 746-763, 2020

2020
[27]

W ang and J

C. W ang and J. W ang , A Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Method for Secon d Order Elliptic Equations in Non-Divergence form , Mathematics of Computation, Vol. 87, pp. 515-545, 2018

2018
[28]

W ang and J

C. W ang and J. W ang, Discretization of Div-Curl Systems by Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods on Polyhedral Partitions , Journal of Scientiﬁc Computing, Vol. 68, pp. 1144-1171, 2016

2016
[29]

W ang and J

C. W ang and J. W ang, A Hybridized Formulation for Weak Galerkin Finite Element M eth- ods for Biharmonic Equation on Polygonal or Polyhedral Mesh es, International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling, Vol. 12, pp. 302-317, 2015

2015
[30]

W ang and C

J. W ang and C. W ang, Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Elliptic PDEs , Science China, Vol. 45, pp. 1061-1092, 2015

2015
[31]

W ang and J

C. W ang and J. W ang , An Eﬃcient Numerical Scheme for the Biharmonic Equation by Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods on Polygonal or Polyhe dral Meshes, Journal of Com- puters and Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 68, 12, pp. 2 314-2330, 2014

2014
[32]

W ang, J

C. W ang, J. W ang, R. W ang and R. Zhang, A Locking-Free Weak Galerkin Finite Element Method for Elasticity Problems in the Primal Formulation , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 307, pp. 346-366, 2016

2016
[33]

W ang, J

C. W ang, J. W ang, X. Ye and S. Zhang , De Rham Complexes for Weak Galerkin Finite Element Spaces, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 39 7, pp. 113645, 2021

2021
[34]

W ang, J

C. W ang, J. W ang and S. Zhang , Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Optimal Control Problems Governed by Second Order Elliptic Partial Diﬀerential Equations , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, in press, 2024

2024
[35]

W ang, J

C. W ang, J. W ang and S. Zhang , A parallel iterative procedure for weak Galerkin methods for second order elliptic problems , International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modeling , vol. 21(1), pp. 1-19, 2023

2023
[36]

W ang, J

C. W ang, J. W ang and S. Zhang , Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Quad-Curl Problems, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 42 8, pp. 115186, 2023

2023
[37]

W ang, and X

J. W ang, and X. Ye , A weak Galerkin mixed ﬁnite element method for second-order elliptic problems, Math. Comp., vol. 83, pp. 2101-2126, 2014

2014
[38]

W ang, X

C. W ang, X. Ye and S. Zhang , A Modiﬁed weak Galerkin ﬁnite element method for the Maxwell equations on polyhedral meshes , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathemat- ics, vol. 448, pp. 115918, 2024

2024
[39]

W ang and S

C. W ang and S. Zhang , A Weak Galerkin Method for Elasticity Interface Problems , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 419, 114726 , 2023. 19

2023
[40]

W ang and L

C. W ang and L. Zikatanov , Low Regularity Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Convection-Diﬀusion Equations , Journal of Computational and Applied Math- ematics, vol 394, 113543, 2021

2021
[41]

W ang and H

C. W ang and H. Zhou, A Weak Galerkin Finite Element Method for a Type of Fourth Ord er Problem arising from Fluorescence Tomography, Journal of Scientiﬁc Computing, Vol. 71(3), pp. 897-918, 2017

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [42]

Xiu and S

Y. Xiu and S. Zhang , A stabilizer free weak Galerkin ﬁnite element method for the bihar- monic equation on polytopal meshes , SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol 58, No. 5, pp. 2572-2588, 2020. Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, Gainesvi lle, FL 32611, USA. Email address : chunmei.wang@ufl.edu

work page 2020

[2] [23]

W ang, Auto-Stabilized Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for B iharmonic Equations on Polytopal Meshes without Convexity Assumptions , arXiv:2409.05887

C. W ang, Auto-Stabilized Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for B iharmonic Equations on Polytopal Meshes without Convexity Assumptions , arXiv:2409.05887

arXiv

[3] [1]

W. Cao, C. W ang and J. W ang , An Lp-Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Method for div-curl Systems, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 42 2, 114881, 2023

work page 2023

[4] [2]

W. Cao, C. W ang and J. W ang, An Lp-Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Method for Convection- Diﬀusion Equations , Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 41 9, 114698, 2023

work page 2023

[5] [3]

W. Cao, C. W ang and J. W ang , A New Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Method for Elliptic Interface Problems with Low Regularity Assumptions , Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 470, 111538, 2022

work page 2022

[6] [4]

S. Cao, C. W ang and J. W ang , A new numerical method for div-curl Systems with Low Regularity Assumptions, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 144, pp . 47-59, 2022

work page 2022

[7] [5]

Cao and C

W. Cao and C. W ang , New Primal-Dual Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Convection-Diﬀusion Problems , Applied Numerical Mathematics, vol. 162, pp. 171-191, 202 1

work page

[8] [6]

D. Li, Y. Nie, and C. W ang , Superconvergence of Numerical Gradient for Weak Galerkin Finite Element Methods on Nonuniform Cartesian Partitions in Three Dimensions , Com- puters and Mathematics with Applications, vol 78(3), pp. 90 5-928, 2019

work page 2019