Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 215 references

X-ray properties of coronal emission in radio quiet Active Galactic Nuclei

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This review argues that the X-ray corona of radio-quiet AGN is a compact, dynamic, Comptonizing plasma whose observable properties trace the black hole's Eddington ratio.

desk verdict A solid, useful review that needs a revision pass: the Γ–λ_Edd relation is stated three different ways, and the inconsistency sits right at the center of the review's synthesis. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11321 v2 pith:FUCAER2F submitted 2024-12-15 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords activegalacticnucleiX-raycoronaComptonizationEddingtonratiopolarizationreverberationmappingsupermassiveblackholesradio-quietAGN
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review consolidates four decades of X-ray observations into a single physical picture: in radio-quiet active galactic nuclei, the corona is a compact region, typically smaller than about ten gravitational radii, filled with roughly $10^{9}$ K electrons that upscatter ultraviolet disk photons into the observed X-ray power law. The authors argue that this corona is a universal product of accretion onto supermassive black holes, with its photon index, cutoff energy, luminosity, and polarization all systematically linked to the Eddington ratio and to other AGN components such as the UV disk, the infrared torus, and the radio emission. The stakes are high because coronal X-rays make up 5–10 percent of the bolometric output of AGN, and the corona is the closest directly observable region to the black hole.

What carries the argument

The central physical mechanism is inverse Compton scattering: UV seed photons from the accretion disk are repeatedly scattered by hot electrons, producing a spectrum approximated by $F(E) \propto E^{-\Gamma} e^{-E/E_C}$, where $\Gamma$ encodes the electron temperature and optical depth and $E_C$ marks the high-energy cutoff. The accompanying compactness parameter $\ell = L\sigma_T/(R m_e c^3)$ controls electron–positron pair production, which acts as a thermostat that prevents runaway heating, and the hybrid thermal/non-thermal nature of the plasma sets the position of sources in the temperature–compactness plane. These tools convert spectral measurements into physical statements about coronal size, temperature, and geometry, while the empirical relations, such as $\alpha_{\rm OX}$ versus UV luminosity and $\Gamma$ versus $\lambda_{\rm Edd}$, tie the corona to the rest of the AGN system.

What would settle it

Catch a fresh X-ray eclipse in a bright radio-quiet AGN with simultaneous broad-band X-ray coverage, measure the eclipsing cloud's distance and velocity from its absorption lines, and derive the coronal size from the eclipse ingress and egress; if that size comes out larger than roughly 20 gravitational radii, the compact-corona synthesis would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that the X-ray corona in radio-quiet AGN is a compact, dynamic, Comptonizing plasma: the size is bounded above by roughly 10 gravitational radii through variability timescales, reverberation lags, microlensing, and X-ray eclipses, and the geometry is constrained by X-ray polarization, which for NGC 4151 shows a degree of 4–8 percent that rules out a simple spherical or lamp-post corona and favors an extended structure parallel to the accretion disk. The spectral parameters, photon index $\Gamma$ and cutoff energy $E_C$, are tied to the Eddington ratio $\lambda_{\rm Edd}$: higher-accreting sources show steeper spectra and lower cutoff energies, consistent with a pair-production thermostat that keeps compact coronae from overheating. The review also gathers the empirical relations connecting coronal emission to the UV disk, the infrared torus, the optical lines, and the radio band, and it argues that the corona, not the jet, is the likely origin of the radio–X-ray correlation and of the high-energy neutrinos seen from NGC 1068.

Load-bearing premise

The coronal size estimates from X-ray eclipses assume the eclipsing clouds are gravitationally bound to the black hole and move on Keplerian orbits; if those clouds are at different distances or have non-Keplerian motion, the inferred sizes near 5–10 gravitational radii would be systematically wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the corona is compact and dynamic, its size and motion can be tracked in real time through reverberation lags and X-ray eclipses, and its geometry can be constrained by X-ray polarization; the measured 4–8 percent polarization in NGC 4151 already excludes a simple spherical or lamp-post corona.
  • If the pair-production thermostat sets coronal temperature, then high-Eddington AGN should show steeper photon indices and lower cutoff energies, as observed, and the same physics should apply across black-hole mass scales, from stellar-mass binaries to supermassive AGN.
  • If the corona is also a synchrotron and neutrino source, then the observed radio–X-ray correlation in radio-quiet AGN and the neutrino excess from NGC 1068 can be attributed to the corona rather than to jets.
  • If changing-look AGN such as 1ES 1927+654 genuinely extinguish and then rebrighten their corona, then disk–corona coupling can be disrupted on months-to-years timescales, providing a natural laboratory for coronal energy-balance mechanisms.
  • If the collected empirical relations hold across luminosity and redshift, X-ray brightness and spectral slope can serve as proxies for bolometric luminosity and Eddington ratio in large AGN surveys.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension beyond the review: if the $\Gamma$–$\lambda_{\rm Edd}$ relation is calibrated with precise cutoff measurements from future hard-X-ray missions, coronal spectroscopy could become a tool for estimating Eddington ratios in heavily obscured AGN where the UV/optical disk is hidden.
  • The polarization results imply that the lamp-post geometry, widely used in reverberation and reflection models, is too simple; an editorial inference is that spectral-timing codes will need to incorporate extended, disk-hugging emissivity profiles to match future polarization and lag data.
  • The review's emphasis on magnetic reconnection as the energy source suggests a concrete prediction: the rate of coronal flares should track the magnetic flux threading the inner disk, which all-sky X-ray monitors could test by comparing flare statistics across Eddington ratio and black-hole mass.
  • Because the size estimates from eclipses, microlensing, and reverberation all agree near 5–10 gravitational radii, an inference is that a single well-observed eclipse with an independently measured cloud distance could become a decisive cross-check of the entire compact-corona picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of the X-ray coronal emission of radio-quiet AGN. It introduces the basic coronal physics (inverse Compton scattering, synchrotron emission, pair production), then reviews the spectral properties of the corona (photon index, high-energy cutoff, optical depth, luminosity), the coronal size and geometry constraints from spectral fitting, reverberation, microlensing, X-ray eclipses, and IXPE polarimetry, as well as X-ray variability and flares, the disk-corona connection, high-energy neutrinos, empirical relations (summarized in Table 1), open questions, and future observational and simulation prospects. The central synthesis is that the AGN corona is a ubiquitous, compact (typically less than about 10 gravitational radii), dynamic, Comptonizing plasma whose observed properties are systematically linked to the Eddington ratio and to other AGN components such as the UV disk, IR torus, and radio emission.

Significance. As a review article, the manuscript is useful and generally well organized. It brings together recent results from IXPE polarimetry, X-ray reverberation, microlensing, and neutrino observations, and it explicitly states several important caveats, including the Keplerian assumption in the eclipse-based size estimates and the detection-threshold nature of the low-luminosity limit. The figures are informative and the reference list is broad. The paper contains no new derivations or data analyses, so its value rests on the accuracy and internal consistency of the reported empirical relations; on that point the manuscript currently has a load-bearing inconsistency that needs to be resolved before publication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.6 and Table 1] The Gamma-lambda_Edd relation, which is a stated pillar of the review's synthesis, is presented inconsistently across the text, Table 1, and Figure 6. Section 2.6 states Gamma ~ 0.3 log lambda_Edd + 2 and says that sources with lambda_Edd > 0.3 have Gamma > 2, while Table 1 row (2a) gives Gamma = (0.41 +/- 0.09) log lambda_Edd + (2.17 +/- 0.07) for lambda_Edd > 0.01; evaluating the table relation at lambda_Edd = 0.3 (log lambda_Edd = -0.52) gives Gamma ~ 1.96, not >2. Row (2b) places a break at lambda_Edd = 0.01, whereas Section 2.4 and Figure 6 left place the break at lambda_Edd ~ 10^-3. The same subsection then cites Laurenti et al. (2022), Liu et al. (2021), and Kamraj et al. (2022) as finding no Gamma-lambda_Edd correlation. As written, a reader cannot determine which relation the review endorses. The authors should harmonize the text, table, and figure; specify the samples and break value; and explicitly discuss how the null results qualify the claimed positive correlation.
  2. [Table 1, rows (2a) and (2b)] Even taken at face value, the piecewise Gamma-lambda_Edd relation in Table 1 is discontinuous at the break. At lambda_Edd = 0.01 (log lambda_Edd = -2), row (2a) gives Gamma ~ 1.35 while row (2b) gives Gamma ~ 1.73, a gap of about 0.4. If the intent is a broken power law, the two segments should join at the break; if the two rows instead refer to different samples or different fitting methods, this should be stated explicitly. The current presentation makes the table internally inconsistent and weakens the claim that coronal properties are systematically tied to the Eddington ratio.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1, row (1a)] The entry 'alpha_OX = (0.154 +/- -0.010) log L_2500 - (3.176 +/- 0.223)' contains an apparent typo: the uncertainty on the slope should not be written with a minus sign. This should be corrected to a conventional form such as (0.154 +/- 0.010).
  2. [Figure 4 caption] The caption repeats the sentence 'The vertical dotted line denotes the time when the X-rays revived.' The duplicate sentence should be removed.
  3. [Section 2.3] The text cites 'Masterson et al. 2025, Nature, in press' for the recurrent QPO in 1ES 1927+654, but this reference does not appear in the reference list. A complete citation should be added.
  4. [Section 2.2, item (4)] The eclipse-based size estimates explicitly assume that the absorbing clouds are gravitationally bound and in Keplerian orbits. While this assumption is stated, the abstract and Section 2.2 would benefit from a sentence noting that the compactness conclusion does not rest solely on the eclipse method, since the spectral, variability, reverberation, and microlensing methods independently point to sizes of about 5-10 R_G.
  5. [Table 1 footnote] The footnote 'Note that here X-ray, L_X-ray and L_2-10 keV has been interchangeably used' contains a subject-verb agreement error and would be clearer as 'have been used interchangeably.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review compiles independent observational results; no derivation reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript is an invited review rather than a derivation paper. It presents no new model, fit, or prediction whose output is constructed from its own inputs. The compactness claim (corona < 10 R_G) rests on four independent methods—emissivity/reflection modeling, variability and reverberation, microlensing, and X-ray eclipses—each citing external observational analyses; the eclipse method's Keplerian cloud assumption is stated as a caveat and is not the sole support for compactness. The empirical relations in Section 2.6 and Table 1 (alpha_OX, Gamma-lambda_Edd, L_12mu-L_2-10keV, fundamental plane, Gudel-Benz, Iwasawa-Taniguchi) are quoted from prior independent samples and are not fitted or rederived here. Self-citations such as Ricci et al. (2017, 2018, 2023) and Laha et al. (2022) are used as literature support alongside many non-author works, and none is invoked to forbid alternatives or to supply a uniqueness theorem. The internal inconsistency between the text's Gamma ~ 0.3 log lambda_Edd + 2 statement and Table 1's row (2a) is a correctness/consistency concern, not circularity, because neither relation is an output of this review. No circular step can be exhibited with a quote, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review makes no new measurements or fits. The central synthesis rests on the standard Comptonization model for coronal X-rays and on published empirical correlations. The illustrative COMPPS simulation in Figure 1 uses hand-chosen values (tau=0.8, seed temperature 10 eV) but they are not fitted to data and do not support any conclusion. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The X-ray continuum of AGN coronae is produced by inverse Compton scattering of UV seed photons by hot (T ~ 10^9 K) electrons.
    This is the standard model used throughout the review (Section 1.1) and underlies all interpretations of the power-law slope and cut-off.
  • domain assumption The high-energy cut-off (E_C) measured from NuSTAR and other hard X-ray data is related to coronal electron temperature as E_C ~ 2-3 kT_e.
    Used in Section 2.1 to convert measured cut-offs to temperatures and to interpret the anti-correlation between kT_e and tau.
  • domain assumption The radio emission in radio-quiet AGN at 5-200 GHz is predominantly coronal synchrotron emission rather than jet or star formation emission.
    This is needed for the Guedel-Benz relation and the mm-X-ray correlation discussed in Sections 2.6 and 1.1. The review itself notes caveats about synchrotron self-absorption.
  • domain assumption The empirical correlations in Table 1 (e.g., alpha_OX-L_UV, Gamma-lambda_Edd, L_12micrometer-L_2-10keV) are intrinsic and not driven by selection effects or common distance/luminosity dependence.
    The review's synthesis relies on these correlations as factual. Many of these are established in the literature but are not derived in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of X-ray properties of coronal emission in radio quiet Active Galactic Nuclei." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FUCAER2F

@misc{pith2026241211321,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: X-ray properties of coronal emission in radio quiet Active Galactic Nuclei},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FUCAER2F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11321}
}
abstract

Active galactic nuclei (AGN) are powerful sources of panchromatic radiation. All AGN emit in X-rays, contributing around $\sim 5-10\%$ of the AGN bolometric luminosity. The X-ray emitting region, popularly known as the corona, is geometrically and radiatively compact with a size typically $\lesssim 10 \, R_{\rm G}$ (gravitational radii). The rapid and extreme variability in X-rays also suggest that the corona must be a dynamic structure. Decades of X-ray studies have shed much light on the topic, but the nature and origin of AGN corona are still not clearly understood. This is mostly due to the complexities involved in several physical processes at play in the high-gravity, high-density and high-temperature region in the vicinity of the supermassive black hole (SMBH). It is still not clear how exactly the corona is energetically and physically sustained near a SMBH. The ubiquity of coronal emission in AGN points to their fundamental role in black hole accretion processes. In this review we discuss the X-ray observational properties of corona in radio quiet AGN.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.11321 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. AGN coronal typical parameters and spectra. Left Panel: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pair production acting as a thermostat for coronal plasmas. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of the X-ray spectral parameters of AGN coronal emission: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The short and long term X-ray flares in AGN corona. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relationship between AGN corona and its surroundings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The relation between the coronal emission and AGN accretion: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

215 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    adobe:ns:meta/

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

  2. [2]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence := #2 '...

  3. [3]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  4. [4]

    G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al

    Aartsen, M. G., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., et al. 2020, Phys. Rev. Lett., 124, 051103, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.051103

  5. [5]

    e , J., et al

    Alston , W., Fabian , A., Markevi c iut \. e , J., et al. 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 417, 10.1002/asna.201612323

  6. [6]

    N., Markeviciute , J., Kara , E., Fabian , A

    Alston , W. N., Markeviciute , J., Kara , E., Fabian , A. C., & Middleton , M. 2014, , 445, L16, 10.1093/mnrasl/slu127

  7. [7]

    N., Parker , M

    Alston , W. N., Parker , M. L., Markevi c i \= u t \. e , J., et al. 2015, , 449, 467, 10.1093/mnras/stv351

  8. [8]

    Arnaud , K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes , 17

Show all 215 references
  1. [9]

    F., Smette , A., & Duschl , W

    Asmus , D., Gandhi , P., H \"o nig , S. F., Smette , A., & Duschl , W. J. 2015, , 454, 766, 10.1093/mnras/stv1950

  2. [10]

    A., & Hawley , J

    Balbus , S. A., & Hawley , J. F. 1998, Reviews of Modern Physics, 70, 1, 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1

  3. [11]

    D., Laor , A., Behar , E., et al

    Baldi , R. D., Laor , A., Behar , E., et al. 2022, , 510, 1043, 10.1093/mnras/stab3445

  4. [12]

    A., Madejski , G., et al

    Balokovi \'c , M., Harrison , F. A., Madejski , G., et al. 2020, , 905, 41, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc342

  5. [13]

    D., Barbier , L

    Barthelmy , S. D., Barbier , L. M., Cummings , J. R., et al. 2005, , 120, 143, 10.1007/s11214-005-5096-3

  6. [14]

    1999, , 121, 473, 10.1086/313202

    Bassani , L., Dadina , M., Maiolino , R., et al. 1999, , 121, 473, 10.1086/313202

  7. [15]

    D., Laor , A., et al

    Behar , E., Baldi , R. D., Laor , A., et al. 2015, , 451, 517, 10.1093/mnras/stv988

  8. [16]

    D., Smith , K

    Behar , E., Vogel , S., Baldi , R. D., Smith , K. L., & Mushotzky , R. F. 2018, , 478, 399, 10.1093/mnras/sty850

  9. [17]

    2017, , 850, 14, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa906a

    Beheshtipour , B., Krawczynski , H., & Malzac , J. 2017, , 850, 14, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa906a

  10. [18]

    1990, , 230, 103

    Belloni , T., & Hasinger , G. 1990, , 230, 103

  11. [19]

    Beloborodov , A. M. 2017, , 850, 141, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f4f

  12. [20]

    2021, , 655, A109, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140852

    Bisogni , S., Lusso , E., Civano , F., et al. 2021, , 655, A109, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140852

  13. [21]

    N., Mathur , S., & Elvis , M

    Brandt , W. N., Mathur , S., & Elvis , M. 1997, , 285, L25, 10.1093/mnras/285.3.L25

  14. [22]

    W., Madejski , G., Fuerst , F., et al

    Brenneman , L. W., Madejski , G., Fuerst , F., et al. 2014, , 781, 83, 10.1088/0004-637X/781/2/83

  15. [23]

    D., Mainieri , V., et al

    Brightman , M., Silverman , J. D., Mainieri , V., et al. 2013, , 433, 2485, 10.1093/mnras/stt920

  16. [24]

    Buisson , D. J. K., Fabian , A. C., & Lohfink , A. M. 2018, , 481, 4419, 10.1093/mnras/sty2609

  17. [25]

    M., Bentz , M

    Cackett , E. M., Bentz , M. C., & Kara , E. 2021, iScience, 24, 102557, 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102557

  18. [26]

    M., Zoghbi , A., Reynolds , C., et al

    Cackett , E. M., Zoghbi , A., Reynolds , C., et al. 2014, , 438, 2980, 10.1093/mnras/stt2424

  19. [27]

    M., Gelbord , J., Barth , A

    Cackett , E. M., Gelbord , J., Barth , A. J., et al. 2023, , 958, 195, 10.3847/1538-4357/acfdac

  20. [29]

    S., Dai , X., Poindexter , S., & Garmire , G

    Chartas , G., Kochanek , C. S., Dai , X., Poindexter , S., & Garmire , G. 2009, , 693, 174, 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/174

  21. [30]

    2023, , 959, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/acffc6

    Chernoglazov , A., Hakobyan , H., & Philippov , A. 2023, , 959, 122, 10.3847/1538-4357/acffc6

  22. [31]

    M., Petropoulou, M., Sironi, L., & Giannios, D

    Christie, I. M., Petropoulou, M., Sironi, L., & Giannios, D. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 482, 65, 10.1093/mnras/sty2636

  23. [32]

    D., McHardy , I

    Connolly , S. D., McHardy , I. M., Skipper , C. J., & Emmanoulopoulos , D. 2016, , 459, 3963, 10.1093/mnras/stw878

  24. [33]

    A., Ricketts , M

    Cooke , B. A., Ricketts , M. J., Maccacaro , T., et al. 1978, , 182, 489, 10.1093/mnras/182.3.489

  25. [34]

    S., & Reynolds , C

    Cowperthwaite , P. S., & Reynolds , C. S. 2014, , 791, 126, 10.1088/0004-637X/791/2/126

  26. [35]

    C., Tang , Y

    Dai , Y., Auch \`e re , F., Vial , J. C., Tang , Y. H., & Zong , W. G. 2010, , 708, 913, 10.1088/0004-637X/708/2/913

  27. [36]

    J., et al

    Dauser , T., Garc \' a , J., Walton , D. J., et al. 2016, , 590, A76, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628135

  28. [37]

    2013, , 430, 1694, 10.1093/mnras/sts710

    Dauser , T., Garcia , J., Wilms , J., et al. 2013, , 430, 1694, 10.1093/mnras/sts710

  29. [38]

    2013, , 431, 2441, 10.1093/mnras/stt339

    De Marco , B., Ponti , G., Cappi , M., et al. 2013, , 431, 2441, 10.1093/mnras/stt339

  30. [39]

    1998, , 299, L15, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01950.x

    Di Matteo , T. 1998, , 299, L15, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01950.x

  31. [40]

    C., & Ricci , C

    Ding , Y., Li , R., Ho , L. C., & Ricci , C. 2022, , 931, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6955

  32. [41]

    Done , C., & Fabian , A. C. 1989, , 240, 81, 10.1093/mnras/240.1.81

  33. [42]

    E., & Ho , L

    Dong , R., Greene , J. E., & Ho , L. C. 2012, , 761, 73, 10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/73

  34. [43]

    M., Horne , K., et al

    Edelson , R., Gelbord , J. M., Horne , K., et al. 2015, , 806, 129, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/129

  35. [44]

    2019, , 870, 123, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3b4

    Edelson , R., Gelbord , J., Cackett , E., et al. 2019, , 870, 123, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf3b4

  36. [45]

    Eichmann, B., Oikonomou, F., Salvatore, S., Dettmar, R.-J., & Tjus, J. B. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 939, 43, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9588

  37. [46]

    S., et al

    Elvis , M., Maccacaro , T., Wilson , A. S., et al. 1978, , 183, 129, 10.1093/mnras/183.2.129

  38. [47]

    J., McDowell , J

    Elvis , M., Wilkes , B. J., McDowell , J. C., et al. 1994, , 95, 1, 10.1086/192093

  39. [48]

    C., Lohfink , A., Belmont , R., Malzac , J., & Coppi , P

    Fabian , A. C., Lohfink , A., Belmont , R., Malzac , J., & Coppi , P. 2017, , 467, 2566, 10.1093/mnras/stx221

  40. [49]

    C., Lohfink , A., Kara , E., et al

    Fabian , A. C., Lohfink , A., Kara , E., et al. 2015, , 451, 4375, 10.1093/mnras/stv1218

  41. [50]

    C., Zoghbi , A., Ross , R

    Fabian , A. C., Zoghbi , A., Ross , R. R., et al. 2009, , 459, 540, 10.1038/nature08007

  42. [51]

    Fang , K., Halzen , F., Heinz , S., & Gallagher , J. S. 2024, , 975, L35, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad887b

  43. [52]

    Fang , K., Lopez Rodriguez , E., Halzen , F., & Gallagher , J. S. 2023, , 956, 8, 10.3847/1538-4357/acee70

  44. [53]

    M., Denney , K

    Fausnaugh , M. M., Denney , K. D., Barth , A. J., et al. 2016, , 821, 56, 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/56

  45. [54]

    Fiorillo , D. F. G., Petropoulou , M., Comisso , L., Peretti , E., & Sironi , L. 2024, , 961, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad192b

  46. [55]

    C., Secrest , N

    Fischer , T. C., Secrest , N. J., Johnson , M. C., et al. 2021, , 906, 88, 10.3847/1538-4357/abca3c

  47. [56]

    A., Rosner , R., & Vaiana , G

    Galeev , A. A., Rosner , R., & Vaiana , G. S. 1979, , 229, 318, 10.1086/156957

  48. [57]

    2018, in Revisiting Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies and their Place in the Universe, 34

    Gallo , L. 2018, in Revisiting Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxies and their Place in the Universe, 34. 1807.09838

  49. [58]

    C., Gonzalez , A

    Gallo , L. C., Gonzalez , A. G., & Miller , J. M. 2021, , 908, L33, 10.3847/2041-8213/abdcb5

  50. [59]

    C., Gonzalez , A

    Gallo , L. C., Gonzalez , A. G., Waddell , S. G. H., et al. 2019, , 484, 4287, 10.1093/mnras/stz274

  51. [60]

    2009, , 502, 457, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811368

    Gandhi , P., Horst , H., Smette , A., et al. 2009, , 502, 457, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811368

  52. [61]

    Gaskell , C. M. 2004, , 612, L21, 10.1086/424565

  53. [62]

    2004, , 413, 535, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031562

    Ghisellini , G., Haardt , F., & Matt , G. 2004, , 413, 535, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031562

  54. [63]

    2023, , 955, 3, 10.3847/1538-4357/aced92

    Ghosh , R., Laha , S., Meyer , E., et al. 2023, , 955, 3, 10.3847/1538-4357/aced92

  55. [64]

    1979, , 230, 540, 10.1086/157110

    Giacconi , R., Branduardi , G., Briel , U., et al. 1979, , 230, 540, 10.1086/157110

  56. [65]

    E., Kim , D

    Gianolli , V. E., Kim , D. E., Bianchi , S., et al. 2023, , 523, 4468, 10.1093/mnras/stad1697

  57. [66]

    2008, , 455, 369, 10.1038/nature07277

    Gierli \'n ski , M., Middleton , M., Ward , M., & Done , C. 2008, , 455, 369, 10.1038/nature07277

  58. [67]

    2007, , 463, 79, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066334

    Gilli , R., Comastri , A., & Hasinger , G. 2007, , 463, 79, 10.1051/0004-6361:20066334

  59. [68]

    2004, , 414, 1091, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031684

    Gleissner , T., Wilms , J., Pottschmidt , K., et al. 2004, , 414, 1091, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031684

  60. [69]

    G., Wilkins , D

    Gonzalez , A. G., Wilkins , D. R., & Gallo , L. C. 2017, , 472, 1932, 10.1093/mnras/stx2080

  61. [70]

    2012, , 544, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219008

    Gonz \'a lez-Mart \' n , O., & Vaughan , S. 2012, , 544, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219008

  62. [71]

    Grandi , P., Tagliaferri , G., Giommi , P., Barr , P., & Palumbo , G. G. C. 1992, , 82, 93, 10.1086/191710

  63. [72]

    M., Sironi , L., & Philippov , A

    Gro s elj , D., Hakobyan , H., Beloborodov , A. M., Sironi , L., & Philippov , A. 2024, , 132, 085202, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.085202

  64. [73]

    C., et al

    Grupe , D., Komossa , S., Gallo , L. C., et al. 2012, , 199, 28, 10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/28

  65. [75]

    Guedel , M., & Benz , A. O. 1993, , 405, L63, 10.1086/186766

  66. [76]

    1991, , 380, L51, 10.1086/186171

    Haardt , F., & Maraschi , L. 1991, , 380, L51, 10.1086/186171

  67. [77]

    1993, , 413, 507, 10.1086/173020

    ---. 1993, , 413, 507, 10.1086/173020

  68. [78]

    A., Craig , W

    Harrison , F. A., Craig , W. W., Christensen , F. E., et al. 2013, , 770, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103

  69. [80]

    2023, , 131, 231001, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.231001

    Hooper , D., & Plant , K. 2023, , 131, 231001, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.231001

  70. [81]

    2020, , 895, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9019

    Huang , J., Luo , B., Du , P., et al. 2020, , 895, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9019

  71. [82]

    2022, Science, 378, 538, 10.1126/science.abg3395

    IceCube Collaboration , Abbasi , R., Ackermann , M., et al. 2022, Science, 378, 538, 10.1126/science.abg3395

  72. [83]

    2013, , 434, 1476, 10.1093/mnras/stt1107

    Ingram , A., & van der Klis , M. 2013, , 434, 1476, 10.1093/mnras/stt1107

  73. [84]

    2023, , 525, 5437, 10.1093/mnras/stad2625

    Ingram , A., Ewing , M., Marinucci , A., et al. 2023, , 525, 5437, 10.1093/mnras/stad2625

  74. [85]

    2020, , 891, L33, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab7661

    Inoue , Y., Khangulyan , D., & Doi , A. 2020, , 891, L33, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab7661

  75. [86]

    1993, , 413, L15, 10.1086/186948

    Iwasawa , K., & Taniguchi , Y. 1993, , 413, L15, 10.1086/186948

  76. [87]

    W., Brandt , W

    Just , D. W., Brandt , W. N., Shemmer , O., et al. 2007, , 665, 1004, 10.1086/519990

  77. [88]

    A., et al

    Kamraj , N., Brightman , M., Harrison , F. A., et al. 2022, , 927, 42, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac45f6

  78. [89]

    N., Fabian , A

    Kara , E., Alston , W. N., Fabian , A. C., et al. 2016, , 462, 511, 10.1093/mnras/stw1695

  79. [90]

    C., Cackett , E

    Kara , E., Fabian , A. C., Cackett , E. M., Miniutti , G., & Uttley , P. 2013, , 430, 1408, 10.1093/mnras/stt024

  80. [91]

    A., Lohfink , A., et al

    Kara , E., Garc \' a , J. A., Lohfink , A., et al. 2017, , 468, 3489, 10.1093/mnras/stx792

  81. [92]

    J., Cackett , E

    Kara , E., Barth , A. J., Cackett , E. M., et al. 2023, , 947, 62, 10.3847/1538-4357/acbcd3

  82. [93]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.03880

    Kawamuro , T., Ricci , C., Imanishi , M., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.03880. 2208.03880

  83. [94]

    C., Bechtold , J., Trump , J

    Kelly , B. C., Bechtold , J., Trump , J. R., Vestergaard , M., & Siemiginowska , A. 2008, , 176, 355, 10.1086/533440

  84. [95]

    C., Sobolewska , M., & Siemiginowska , A

    Kelly , B. C., Sobolewska , M., & Siemiginowska , A. 2011, , 730, 52, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/1/52

  85. [96]

    Kheirandish , A., Murase , K., & Kimura , S. S. 2021, , 922, 45, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c77

  86. [99]

    2022, Science, 378, 650, 10.1126/science.add5399

    Krawczynski , H., Muleri , F., Dov c iak , M., et al. 2022, Science, 378, 650, 10.1126/science.add5399

  87. [100]

    H., Horne , K., Kallman , T

    Krolik , J. H., Horne , K., Kallman , T. R., et al. 1991, , 371, 541, 10.1086/169918

  88. [101]

    2022, , 931, 5, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac63aa

    Laha , S., Meyer , E., Roychowdhury , A., et al. 2022, , 931, 5, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac63aa

  89. [102]

    2008, , 390, 847, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13806.x

    Laor , A., & Behar , E. 2008, , 390, 847, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13806.x

  90. [103]

    J., & McDowell , J

    Laor , A., Fiore , F., Elvis , M., Wilkes , B. J., & McDowell , J. C. 1997, , 477, 93, 10.1086/303696

  91. [104]

    2022, , 657, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141829

    Laurenti , M., Piconcelli , E., Zappacosta , L., et al. 2022, , 657, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/202141829

  92. [105]

    G., Pounds , K

    Lawrence , A., Watson , M. G., Pounds , K. A., & Elvis , M. 1987, , 325, 694, 10.1038/325694a0

  93. [106]

    2023, , 519, 3903, 10.1093/mnras/stac3515

    Lawther , D., Vestergaard , M., Raimundo , S., et al. 2023, , 519, 3903, 10.1093/mnras/stac3515

  94. [107]

    A., Godet , O., Webb , N

    Lin , D., Irwin , J. A., Godet , O., Webb , N. A., & Barret , D. 2013, , 776, L10, 10.1088/2041-8205/776/1/L10

  95. [108]

    2020, , 494, 3656, 10.1093/mnras/staa955

    Liska , M., Tchekhovskoy , A., & Quataert , E. 2020, , 494, 3656, 10.1093/mnras/staa955

  96. [109]

    N., et al

    Liu , H., Luo , B., Brandt , W. N., et al. 2021, , 910, 103, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe37f

  97. [110]

    T., & Hamilton , R

    Lu , E. T., & Hamilton , R. J. 1991, , 380, L89, 10.1086/186180

  98. [111]

    H., Schartel , N., & Jansen , F

    Lumb , D. H., Schartel , N., & Jansen , F. A. 2012, Optical Engineering, 51, 011009, 10.1117/1.OE.51.1.011009

  99. [112]

    2016, , 819, 154, 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/154

    Lusso , E., & Risaliti , G. 2016, , 819, 154, 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/154

  100. [113]

    2017, , 602, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/201630079

    ---. 2017, , 602, A79, 10.1051/0004-6361/201630079

  101. [114]

    2010, , 512, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913298

    Lusso , E., Comastri , A., Vignali , C., et al. 2010, , 512, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913298

  102. [115]

    Lyubarskii , Y. E. 1997, , 292, 679, 10.1093/mnras/292.3.679

  103. [117]

    1987, , 25, 223

    Makino , F., & ASTRO-C Team . 1987, , 25, 223

  104. [118]

    A., Jensen , L

    Malkan , M. A., Jensen , L. D., Rodriguez , D. R., Spinoglio , L., & Rush , B. 2017, , 846, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8302

  105. [120]

    2022 a , , 516, 5907, 10.1093/mnras/stac2634

    Marinucci , A., Muleri , F., Dovciak , M., et al. 2022 a , , 516, 5907, 10.1093/mnras/stac2634

  106. [121]

    2022 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.09338

    Marinucci , A., Muleri , F., Dov c iak , M., et al. 2022 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.09338. 2207.09338

  107. [122]

    2015, Science, 348, 311, 10.1126/science.aaa1784

    Mart \' -Vidal , I., Muller , S., Vlemmings , W., Horellou , C., & Aalto , S. 2015, Science, 348, 311, 10.1126/science.aaa1784

  108. [123]

    2017, , 608, A51, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731314

    Martocchia , S., Piconcelli , E., Zappacosta , L., et al. 2017, , 608, A51, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731314

  109. [124]

    2022, , 934, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac76c0

    Masterson , M., Kara , E., Ricci , C., et al. 2022, , 934, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac76c0

  110. [125]

    2015, , 447, 3029, 10.1093/mnras/stu2653

    Matt , G., Balokovi \'c , M., Marinucci , A., et al. 2015, , 447, 3029, 10.1093/mnras/stu2653

  111. [126]

    2024, , 109, L101306, 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L101306

    Mbarek , R., Philippov , A., Chernoglazov , A., Levinson , A., & Mushotzky , R. 2024, , 109, L101306, 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L101306

  112. [127]

    1987, , 325, 696, 10.1038/325696a0

    McHardy , I., & Czerny , B. 1987, , 325, 696, 10.1038/325696a0

  113. [129]

    M., Koerding , E., Knigge , C., Uttley , P., & Fender , R

    McHardy , I. M., Koerding , E., Knigge , C., Uttley , P., & Fender , R. P. 2006, , 444, 730, 10.1038/nature05389

  114. [130]

    M., Papadakis , I

    McHardy , I. M., Papadakis , I. E., & Uttley , P. 1999, Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplements, 69, 509, 10.1016/S0920-5632(98)00272-2

  115. [132]

    M., Werner , G

    Mehlhaff , J. M., Werner , G. R., Uzdensky , D. A., & Begelman , M. C. 2020, , 498, 799, 10.1093/mnras/staa2346

  116. [133]

    Merloni , A., & Fabian , A. C. 2001, , 321, 549, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04060.x

  117. [135]

    2022, , 10.1093/mnras/stac1381

    Middei , R., Marinucci , A., Braito , V., et al. 2022, , 10.1093/mnras/stac1381

  118. [136]

    P., Brandt , W

    Miller , B. P., Brandt , W. N., Schneider , D. P., et al. 2011, , 726, 20, 10.1088/0004-637X/726/1/20

  119. [137]

    A., & Stone , J

    Miller , K. A., & Stone , J. M. 2000, , 534, 398, 10.1086/308736

  120. [139]

    2007, , 59, S1, 10.1093/pasj/59.sp1.S1

    Mitsuda , K., Bautz , M., Inoue , H., et al. 2007, , 59, S1, 10.1093/pasj/59.sp1.S1

  121. [140]

    W., Kochanek , C

    Morgan , C. W., Kochanek , C. S., Dai , X., Morgan , N. D., & Falco , E. E. 2008, , 689, 755, 10.1086/592767

  122. [141]

    M., Kimura , S

    Murase , K., Karwin , C. M., Kimura , S. S., Ajello , M., & Buson , S. 2024, , 961, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad19c5

  123. [142]

    S., & M \'e sz \'a ros , P

    Murase , K., Kimura , S. S., & M \'e sz \'a ros , P. 2020, , 125, 011101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.011101

  124. [143]

    Mushotzky , R. F. 1984, Advances in Space Research, 3, 157, 10.1016/0273-1177(84)90081-4

  125. [144]

    F., Done , C., & Pounds , K

    Mushotzky , R. F., Done , C., & Pounds , K. A. 1993, , 31, 717, 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.003441

  126. [145]

    F., Marshall , F

    Mushotzky , R. F., Marshall , F. E., Boldt , E. A., Holt , S. S., & Serlemitsos , P. J. 1980, , 235, 377, 10.1086/157641

  127. [146]

    2013, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1306.2307

    Nandra , K., Barret , D., Barcons , X., et al. 2013, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1306.2307. 1306.2307

  128. [147]

    a ttil \

    N \"a ttil \"a , J. 2024, Nature Communications, 15, 7026, 10.1038/s41467-024-51257-1

  129. [148]

    Neronov , A., Savchenko , D., & Semikoz , D. V. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.09018, 10.48550/arXiv.2306.09018

  130. [150]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.20146, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.20146

    Padovani , P., Resconi , E., Ajello , M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.20146, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.20146

  131. [152]

    2016, , 819, L19, 10.3847/2041-8205/819/2/L19

    Pan , H.-W., Yuan , W., Yao , S., et al. 2016, , 819, L19, 10.3847/2041-8205/819/2/L19

  132. [153]

    D., Laor , A., et al

    Panessa , F., Baldi , R. D., Laor , A., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 387, 10.1038/s41550-019-0765-4

  133. [154]

    Papadakis , I. E. 2004, , 348, 207, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07351.x

  134. [155]

    L., Wilkins , D

    Parker , M. L., Wilkins , D. R., Fabian , A. C., et al. 2014, , 443, 1723, 10.1093/mnras/stu1246

  135. [156]

    Peterson , B. M. 1993, , 105, 247, 10.1086/133140

  136. [157]

    2016, , 462, 3325, 10.1093/mnras/stw1832

    Petropoulou , M., Giannios , D., & Sironi , L. 2016, , 462, 3325, 10.1093/mnras/stw1832

  137. [158]

    O., Haardt , F., Maraschi , L., et al

    Petrucci , P. O., Haardt , F., Maraschi , L., et al. 2000, , 540, 131, 10.1086/309319

  138. [159]

    2001, , 556, 716, 10.1086/321629

    ---. 2001, , 556, 716, 10.1086/321629

  139. [160]

    O., Paltani , S., Malzac , J., et al

    Petrucci , P. O., Paltani , S., Malzac , J., et al. 2013, , 549, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219956

  140. [161]

    2005, , 432, 15, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041621

    Piconcelli , E., Jimenez-Bail \'o n , E., Guainazzi , M., et al. 2005, , 432, 15, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041621

  141. [162]

    N., Braito , V., Porquet , D., et al

    Reeves , J. N., Braito , V., Porquet , D., et al. 2021, , 500, 1974, 10.1093/mnras/staa3377

  142. [163]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.05132, 10.48550/arXiv.2211.05132

    Ricci , C., & Trakhtenbrot , B. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.05132, 10.48550/arXiv.2211.05132

  143. [164]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1282, 10.1038/s41550-023-02108-4

    ---. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1282, 10.1038/s41550-023-02108-4

  144. [165]

    J., et al

    Ricci , C., Trakhtenbrot , B., Koss , M. J., et al. 2017, , 233, 17, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa96ad

  145. [166]

    C., Fabian , A

    Ricci , C., Ho , L. C., Fabian , A. C., et al. 2018, , 480, 1819, 10.1093/mnras/sty1879

  146. [167]

    2020, , 898, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab91a1

    Ricci , C., Kara , E., Loewenstein , M., et al. 2020, , 898, L1, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab91a1

  147. [168]

    2021, , 255, 7, 10.3847/1538-4365/abe94b

    Ricci , C., Loewenstein , M., Kara , E., et al. 2021, , 255, 7, 10.3847/1538-4365/abe94b

  148. [169]

    2023, , 952, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/acda27

    Ricci , C., Chang , C.-S., Kawamuro , T., et al. 2023, , 952, L28, 10.3847/2041-8213/acda27

  149. [170]

    2022, , 924, L32, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac46a1

    Ripperda , B., Liska , M., Chatterjee , K., et al. 2022, , 924, L32, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac46a1

  150. [171]

    2007, , 659, L111, 10.1086/517884

    Risaliti , G., Elvis , M., Fabbiano , G., et al. 2007, , 659, L111, 10.1086/517884

  151. [172]

    2011, , 410, 1027, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17503.x

    Risaliti , G., Nardini , E., Salvati , M., et al. 2011, , 410, 1027, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17503.x

  152. [173]

    2009, , 700, L6, 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/L6

    Risaliti , G., Young , M., & Elvis , M. 2009, , 700, L6, 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/L6

  153. [174]

    1979, Space Science Instrumentation, 4, 269

    Rothschild , R., Boldt , E., Holt , S., et al. 1979, Space Science Instrumentation, 4, 269

  154. [175]

    E., Mushotzky , F

    Rothschild , R. E., Mushotzky , F. R., Baity , W. A., et al. 1983, , 269, 423, 10.1086/161053

  155. [176]

    B., & Lightman , A

    Rybicki , G. B., & Lightman , A. P. 1979, Radiative processes in astrophysics

  156. [177]

    L., Brightman , M., Stern , D., Malkan , M

    Saade , M. L., Brightman , M., Stern , D., Malkan , M. A., & Garcia , J. A. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2205.14216. 2205.14216

  157. [178]

    C., & Dexter , J

    Scepi , N., Begelman , M. C., & Dexter , J. 2021, , 502, L50, 10.1093/mnrasl/slab002

  158. [179]

    D., & Krolik , J

    Schnittman , J. D., & Krolik , J. H. 2010, , 712, 908, 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/908

  159. [180]

    2024, , 690, A145, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450777

    Serafinelli , R., De Rosa , A., Tortosa , A., et al. 2024, , 690, A145, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450777

  160. [181]

    I., & Sunyaev , R

    Shakura , N. I., & Sunyaev , R. A. 1973, , 24, 337

  161. [182]

    C., & Feng , H

    She , R., Ho , L. C., & Feng , H. 2017, , 842, 131, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7634

  162. [183]

    N., Netzer , H., Maiolino , R., & Kaspi , S

    Shemmer , O., Brandt , W. N., Netzer , H., Maiolino , R., & Kaspi , S. 2006, , 646, L29, 10.1086/506911

  163. [184]

    2008, , 682, 81, 10.1086/588776

    ---. 2008, , 682, 81, 10.1086/588776

  164. [185]

    Sironi , L., & Beloborodov , A. M. 2020, , 899, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/aba622

  165. [186]

    F., & Courtier , G

    Smith , J. F., & Courtier , G. M. 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 350, 421, 10.1098/rspa.1976.0115

  166. [188]

    Sridhar , N., Ripperda , B., Sironi , L., Davelaar , J., & Beloborodov , A. M. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.10662, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.10662

  167. [189]

    Sridhar , N., Sironi , L., & Beloborodov , A. M. 2021, , 507, 5625, 10.1093/mnras/stab2534

  168. [190]

    T., Strateva , I., Brandt , W

    Steffen , A. T., Strateva , I., Brandt , W. N., et al. 2006, , 131, 2826, 10.1086/503627

  169. [191]

    E., Begelman , M

    Stern , B. E., Begelman , M. C., Sikora , M., & Svensson , R. 1995, , 272, 291, 10.1093/mnras/272.2.291

  170. [192]

    V., Brandt , W

    Strateva , I. V., Brandt , W. N., Schneider , D. P., Vanden Berk , D. G., & Vignali , C. 2005, , 130, 387, 10.1086/431247

  171. [193]

    Swank , J. H. 1999, Nuclear Physics B Proceedings Supplements, 69, 12, 10.1016/S0920-5632(98)00175-3

  172. [194]

    2023, , 525, 4735, 10.1093/mnras/stad2627

    Tagliacozzo , D., Marinucci , A., Ursini , F., et al. 2023, , 525, 4735, 10.1093/mnras/stad2627

  173. [195]

    R., Kudoh, T., Masada, Y., & Matsumoto, J

    Takahashi, H. R., Kudoh, T., Masada, Y., & Matsumoto, J. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 739, L53, 10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/l53

  174. [196]

    Tanaka , Y., Inoue , H., & Holt , S. S. 1994, , 46, L37

  175. [197]

    Tananbaum , H., Wardle , J. F. C., Zamorani , G., & Avni , Y. 1983, , 268, 60, 10.1086/160929

  176. [198]

    2020, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tashiro , M., Maejima , H., Toda , K., et al. 2020, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 11444, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder , S. Nikzad , & K. Nakazawa , 1144422, 1...

  177. [199]

    G., Andresen , R

    Taylor , B. G., Andresen , R. D., Peacock , A., & Zobl , R. 1981, , 30, 479, 10.1007/BF01246069

  178. [200]

    Tchekhovskoy , A., Narayan , R., & McKinney , J. C. 2011, , 418, L79, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01147.x

  179. [201]

    Tortosa , A., Bianchi , S., Marinucci , A., Matt , G., & Petrucci , P. O. 2018, , 614, A37, 10.1051/0004-6361/201732382

  180. [202]

    2022, , 509, 3599, 10.1093/mnras/stab3152

    Tortosa , A., Ricci , C., Tombesi , F., et al. 2022, , 509, 3599, 10.1093/mnras/stab3152

  181. [203]

    L., et al

    Trakhtenbrot , B., Arcavi , I., MacLeod , C. L., et al. 2019, , 883, 94, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab39e4

  182. [204]

    M., & Virani , S

    Treister , E., Urry , C. M., & Virani , S. 2009, , 696, 110, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/110

  183. [205]

    J., Reeves , J

    Turner , T. J., Reeves , J. N., Braito , V., et al. 2018, , 481, 2470, 10.1093/mnras/sty2447

  184. [206]

    Ueda , Y., Akiyama , M., Hasinger , G., Miyaji , T., & Watson , M. G. 2014, , 786, 104, 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/104

  185. [208]

    2022 b , , 510, 3674, 10.1093/mnras/stab3745

    ---. 2022 b , , 510, 3674, 10.1093/mnras/stab3745

  186. [209]

    M., Fabian , A

    Uttley , P., Cackett , E. M., Fabian , A. C., Kara , E., & Wilkins , D. R. 2014, , 22, 72, 10.1007/s00159-014-0072-0

  187. [211]

    2005 b , , 359, 345, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08886.x

    ---. 2005 b , , 359, 345, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08886.x

  188. [212]

    S., & Rosner , R

    Vaiana , G. S., & Rosner , R. 1978, , 16, 393, 10.1146/annurev.aa.16.090178.002141

  189. [213]

    1989, , 27, 517, 10.1146/annurev.aa.27.090189.002505

    van der Klis , M. 1989, , 27, 517, 10.1146/annurev.aa.27.090189.002505

  190. [214]

    V., & Fabian , A

    Vasudevan , R. V., & Fabian , A. C. 2007, , 381, 1235, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12328.x

  191. [215]

    S., & Uttley , P

    Vaughan , S., Edelson , R., Warwick , R. S., & Uttley , P. 2003 a , , 345, 1271, 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07042.x

  192. [216]

    C., & Nandra , K

    Vaughan , S., Fabian , A. C., & Nandra , K. 2003 b , , 339, 1237, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06285.x

  193. [218]

    C., O'Dell , S

    Weisskopf , M. C., O'Dell , S. L., & van Speybroeck , L. P. 1996, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 2805, Multilayer and Grazing Incidence X-Ray/EUV Optics III, ed. R. B. Hoover & A. B. Walker , 2--7, 10.1117/12.245079

  194. [219]

    C., Soffitta , P., Baldini , L., et al

    Weisskopf , M. C., Soffitta , P., Baldini , L., et al. 2022, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 8, 026002, 10.1117/1.JATIS.8.2.026002

  195. [220]

    R., & Fabian , A

    Wilkins , D. R., & Fabian , A. C. 2011, , 414, 1269, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18458.x

  196. [222]

    2013, , 430, 247, 10.1093/mnras/sts591

    ---. 2013, , 430, 247, 10.1093/mnras/sts591

  197. [223]

    R., & Gallo , L

    Wilkins , D. R., & Gallo , L. C. 2015 a , , 448, 703, 10.1093/mnras/stu2524

  198. [225]

    2015 c , , 449, 129, 10.1093/mnras/stv162

    ---. 2015 c , , 449, 129, 10.1093/mnras/stv162

  199. [226]

    R., Gallo , L

    Wilkins , D. R., Gallo , L. C., Costantini , E., Brandt , W. N., & Blandford , R. D. 2022, , 512, 761, 10.1093/mnras/stac416

  200. [227]

    R., Kara , E., Fabian , A

    Wilkins , D. R., Kara , E., Fabian , A. C., & Gallo , L. C. 2014, , 443, 2746, 10.1093/mnras/stu1273

  201. [228]

    Winkler , C., Courvoisier , T. J. L., Di Cocco , G., et al. 2003, , 411, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031288

  202. [229]

    M., Giommi , P., Tananbaum , H., & Zamorani , G

    Worrall , D. M., Giommi , P., Tananbaum , H., & Zamorani , G. 1987, , 313, 596, 10.1086/164999

  203. [230]

    2019, , 875, 148, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1261

    Zhang , W., Dov c iak , M., & Bursa , M. 2019, , 875, 148, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1261

  204. [231]

    F., Brandt , W

    Zhu , S. F., Brandt , W. N., Luo , B., et al. 2020, , 496, 245, 10.1093/mnras/staa1411

  205. [232]

    C., Reynolds , C

    Zoghbi , A., Fabian , A. C., Reynolds , C. S., & Cackett , E. M. 2012, , 422, 129, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20587.x

  206. [233]

    C., Uttley , P., et al

    Zoghbi , A., Fabian , A. C., Uttley , P., et al. 2010, , 401, 2419, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15816.x

  207. [234]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.22781, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.22781

    Zou , M., Hakobyan , H., Mbarek , R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.22781, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.22781

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.