Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 235 references

Multi-Peaked Non-Thermal Light Curves from Magnetar-Powered Gamma-Ray Bursts

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A magnetar powering a gamma-ray burst should produce a third non-thermal emission component — a pulsar wind nebula — that dominates the radio light curve for ~6 years in supernova/long GRBs and ~100 days in kilonova/short GRBs at 1 GHz.

desk verdict The first combined three-component magnetar-powered GRB light-curve model with useful analytic peak timescales, but the exponential-rise uniqueness claim is overstated and needs a technical check at 1 GHz. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.12272 v2 pith:MHNXPOGJ submitted 2024-12-16 astro-ph.HE

Conor M. B. Omand , Nikhil Sarin , Gavin P. Lamb This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords magnetarsgamma-rayburstspulsarwindnebulaekilonovaesupernovaeradiotransientsafterglowsnon-thermalemission
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that magnetar-powered gamma-ray bursts are not two-component transients but three: after the GRB afterglow and before the ejecta afterglow, a pulsar wind nebula (PWN) should shine through the ejected material once it becomes transparent, and this middle component should be detectable in the radio. It derives analytic timescales for each peak and shows the PWN dominates the 1 GHz light curve for roughly six years in supernova/long GRBs and roughly one hundred days in kilonova/short GRBs. The identifying feature is the shape of the rise: an exponential, frequency-dependent climb that an ejecta afterglow cannot reproduce, so the component is recognizable, not just an extra bump. If this is right, radio follow-up of nearby bursts becomes a direct probe of the magnetar central engine, its spin-down power, and the ejected material it is buried in.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the escape-time criterion for the pulsar wind nebula: the observed peak occurs when the ejecta's optical depth falls to unity in the relevant band, since the nebula shines from inside the ejecta and its flux is absorbed until the material becomes transparent. For radio, the controlling process is free-free absorption, and the escape timescale scales as $t_{\rm esc}\propto M_{\rm ej}^{2/5} v_{\rm ej}^{-1}\nu^{-0.42}$, which produces the exponential, frequency-dependent rise. The nebula itself is modeled as a synchrotron emitter fed by the magnetar's spin-down luminosity, with a Crab-like magnetic partition ($\epsilon_B\sim 0.01$) and electron injection Lorentz factor ($\gamma_b\sim 10^5$); the GRB afterglow and ejecta afterglow are modeled with standard external-shock scalings. Together the three models produce light curves whose peaks land at the analytic timescales, and a fitting test with a prior that can effectively switch the PWN off shows that the data require the PWN to be on.

What would settle it

Observe a nearby short GRB that shows an X-ray plateau or extended emission at both 1 and 100 GHz on a night-to-week cadence from 10 to 150 days after the burst: the model predicts an exponential, frequency-dependent rebrightening in that window, so a purely power-law decay with no rebrightening would refute the fiducial PWN. A cheaper version of the same test already exists in the radio non-detections of magnetar-driven superluminous supernovae cited by the paper, which pressure the Crab-like assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the non-thermal light curve of a magnetar-powered GRB separates into three components with widely different peak times, and the pulsar wind nebula occupies a clean observational window in between. The PWN's peak is set not by external-shock dynamics but by internal absorption in the ejecta: radio emission escapes when the free-free optical depth drops to unity, soft X-rays when photoelectric opacity clears, and hard X-rays when Compton scattering becomes transparent, giving timescales of about 10 years (radio), 60 years (1 keV), and 100 days (100 keV) for a fiducial supernova, and about 100 days, 6 years, and 2 days for a fiducial kilonova. That mechanism gives the PWN an exponential, frequency-dependent rise to peak ($F_\nu \propto t^3$ with $t_{\rm peak}\propto\nu^{-0.42}$ in the radio), which the ejecta afterglow, whose rise is a deceleration-bounded power law, cannot mimic. Using these models, the paper shows the PWN is the dominant radio component between the two afterglows, infers on a simulated light curve that the emission cannot be explained without the PWN, and derives detection horizons of $z\sim 0.06$ (SN/LGRB) and $z\sim 0.3$ (KN/SGRB) with current instruments, growing to $z\sim 0.3$ and $z\sim 1.5$ with next-generation facilities. It closes by arguing that the optimal search is multi-band, high-cadence radio follow-up of nearby short GRBs with X-ray plateaus or extended emission from 10 to 100 days post-burst.

Load-bearing premise

The radio predictions assume the nebula around the magnetar radiates like the Crab Nebula — with a specific magnetic-field fraction and a specific electron energy — and if the real environment is much more or much less magnetized, the predicted radio glow could be far fainter and the detection windows could shrink or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A late-time radio rebrightening with a fast, exponential rise is a direct signature of a magnetar engine, telling observers when to look: roughly days to a decade post-burst depending on band and progenitor.
  • For the fiducial parameters, the PWN is the dominant 1 GHz component from roughly 6 years (SN/LGRB) and 100 days (KN/SGRB) until 30 years or more, giving late-time radio campaigns a concrete target window.
  • The detection horizons put a measurable population in reach: about 10% of short GRBs lie within the current-instrument horizon at 1 GHz, and next-generation facilities would cover roughly half the short-GRB population at 1 GHz and almost all of it at 100 GHz.
  • Because an exponential rise that is faster at higher frequency cannot be produced by an ejecta afterglow, a single well-sampled radio light curve can discriminate between a magnetar wind nebula and alternative re-brightening mechanisms.
  • For GW170817, the lack of a detected PWN implies that if a stable neutron star remnant formed, its electromagnetic spin-down energy was below about $10^{51}$ erg, corresponding to an initial spin period longer than about 7 ms.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: the paper's detectability horizons should be read as optimistic upper bounds, because the Crab-like microphysics assumption is already in tension with the radio non-detections of magnetar-driven superluminous supernovae cited in the paper; a systematically high- or low-magnetization nebula would shrink the radio window substantially.
  • My inference: the rise-index test the paper proposes ($t^3$-like exponential versus $t^{1.5}$ power-law) could be applied retroactively to archival late-time radio data of nearby mergers, where a hidden third component might be hiding in sparse or stacked observations.
  • My inference: the same three-component decomposition transfers to magnetar-powered transients that lack a GRB jet, such as superluminous supernova remnants, where the ejecta afterglow is absent and the PWN should be the only late non-thermal component — a cleaner test of the nebula physics.
  • My inference: a gravitational-wave-detected merger with a low chirp mass that also shows an X-ray plateau and an anomalously bright kilonova is singled out by this framework as a high-priority PWN target, making the prediction testable within the current observing decade.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper considers magnetar-powered GRBs with three non-thermal components: the GRB afterglow, a pulsar wind nebula (PWN), and the ejecta afterglow. It derives analytic peak timescales for each component in radio and X-ray bands, computes fiducial light curves for SN/LGRB and KN/SGRB scenarios with the public code Redback, and performs an injection-recovery inference test on a simulated KN/SGRB light curve to assess whether a PWN component is distinguishable. The paper also estimates detection horizons for current and next-generation radio instruments, applies the model to GRB170817A and GRB210702A, and recommends an observing strategy. The central claims are that the PWN shows an exponential, frequency-dependent rise to peak that cannot be replicated by an ejecta afterglow, and that PWNe are detectable at radio frequencies in nearby events.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a useful framework for identifying magnetar engines in GRBs through late-time multi-band radio observations. The analytic scalings are cleanly derived from standard physics, the models are publicly available in Redback, and the injection-recovery test is a valid demonstration of parameter identifiability within the assumed model. The paper also gives falsifiable detection horizons and a concrete observing strategy. However, the statement that the PWN rise is exponential is not justified for the 1 GHz band, where the peak is set by synchrotron self-absorption; this affects the abstract's key diagnostic claim and the model-selection test in Section 3.2. The detectability predictions are explicitly contingent on Crab-like PWN microphysics, a caveat the authors acknowledge but do not emphasize in the abstract.

major comments (2)
  1. [3.1, Appendix A2, 3.2] The abstract and Section 3.2 claim that the PWN has an 'exponential, frequency-dependent rise to peak' that cannot be replicated by an ejecta afterglow. For the fiducial KN/SGRB, Section 3.1 states that the 1 GHz peak is set by synchrotron self-absorption (SSA), but Appendix A2 only defines the SSA frequency (Equations A6-A8) and does not specify the emergent flux law used in the Redback implementation. For a self-absorbed synchrotron source, the emergent flux is proportional to S_nu (1 - exp(-tau_nu)), not to the optically thin flux times exp(-tau_nu); the transition through tau_ssa ~ 1 produces a saturating rise, not an exponential attenuation. If the model uses an exponential attenuation for SSA, the simulated 1 GHz light curve in Section 3.2 is not physically motivated, and the uniqueness claim based on the rise shape is invalid at that band. The authors should specify the SSA treatment, and if the physical (1 - exp(-tau)) law is used, restrict the exponential-rise claim to FFA-dominated bands (e.g., 100 GHz) or demonstrate that the SSA rise still provides a distinguishing diagnostic.
  2. [3.2, Table 2] The statement in Section 3.2 that the posterior shows a 0% probability that the transient can be explained without a PWN is stronger than what the test demonstrates. The slab-spike prior places 10% prior mass at L0 = 10^40 erg/s, and the posterior at this spike is zero, which only rules out that specific low-luminosity value within the assumed three-component model. It does not establish that an ejecta-afterglow-only model with a different parameter set cannot fit the data. The physical argument about rise indices (Section 3.2) is more persuasive, but the wording in the abstract and Section 5 ('cannot be explained without a PWN component') should be tempered, or a formal model comparison against an explicit no-PWN model should be performed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [3.1] The electron injection Lorentz factor is given as gamma_b = 10^{-5}; this should be 10^5, consistent with the text in Section 4 and the prior range in Table A1.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'dominating the emission for ~6 years' is ambiguous; the dominance begins at ~6 years and lasts until ~30 years or longer (Section 3.1), so 'from ~6 years' would be clearer.
  3. [4] The caveat that the fiducial Crab-like PWN microphysics may not apply to most magnetar-driven supernovae, based on the lack of observed radio counterparts (Law et al. 2019; Eftekhari et al. 2021), is important for the detectability claims and should be mentioned in the abstract or at the start of the detectability discussion.
  4. [2.1] Equation (3) gives nu_crit in GHz, but the text immediately converts to ~1 keV; consider stating the energy equivalent in the main text for readability.
  5. [2.3] The sentence 'The peak timescales for reverse shocks and counterjets are expected to be much shorter (Kobayashi & Sari 2000; Uhm et al. 2012) and longer (e.g., van Eerten et al. 2012), respectively' is slightly unclear because 'shorter' and 'longer' are separated; rewording would improve clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: peak timescales are forward-model outputs from opacity formulas with externally anchored parameters; self-citations are frequent but not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is forward modeling, not a fit-then-predict loop. The analytic peak timescales in Section 2 come from setting the optical-depth formulas in Appendix A (Eqs. A9, A12, A13) to unity, with fiducial parameters anchored to external data: Crab-like PWN microphysics via Tanaka & Takahara (2010, 2013), GRB afterglow parameters via Fong et al. (2015) and Wang et al. (2015), and r-process nucleosynthesis composition via Foucart et al. (2016) and Roberts et al. (2017). The model light curves in Section 3 are produced by Redback implementations of the same physical assumptions, so the agreement between the Section 2 estimates and Figure 1 is internal consistency, not a circular prediction. The injection-recovery test in Section 3.2 is closed in the sense that the simulated data are generated with the PWN model and fit with the same model, but the paper presents it as a distinguishability exercise, not as empirical validation or as an inference of physical constants; the posterior showing essentially zero probability without a PWN is a property of the simulated data, and the text explicitly discusses parameter degeneracies and measurement noise. Self-citations (Murase et al. 2021; Sarin et al. 2022; Omand & Sarin 2024) are frequent, but the PWN model equations are reproduced in Appendix A and the code is publicly released in Redback, so the citations do not smuggle in an unstated ansatz or enforce a uniqueness claim. The abstract's exponential-rise diagnostic is a model prediction from the assumed absorption treatment; whether the SSA branch at 1 GHz is implemented correctly is a physical-modeling/correctness question, not a circularity. No step was found where an output equals an input by construction or where a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims depend on a set of fiducial microphysical and environmental parameters chosen from prior observations (Galactic PWNe, GRB afterglow fits, nucleosynthesis) and on the one-zone analytic PWN model in Appendix A. The peak timescales and detectability horizons are conditional on these choices, and the authors enumerate several caveats in Section 4. There are no newly invented entities; the PWN, GRB afterglow, and ejecta afterglow are established components.

free parameters (9)
  • Ejecta mass M_ej = 5 M_sun (SN/LGRB); 0.05-0.1 M_sun (KN/SGRB)
    Sets the PWN escape timescale and ejecta afterglow deceleration time; chosen from observations of GRB-SNe and kilonova simulations.
  • Ejecta velocity v_ej = 20,000 km/s (SN); 0.5c (KN)
    Sets the kinetic energy and deceleration timescale, and directly enters the free-free escape time (Eq. 6).
  • Initial spin-down luminosity L0 = 1e48 erg/s (SN); 1e50 erg/s (KN)
    Sets the PWN luminosity and thus the detectability horizons; motivated by magnetar population expectations.
  • Spin-down timescale t_SD = 1e4 s (SN); 1e2 s (KN)
    Controls the duration of energy injection into the PWN and the peak timescale of the magnetar heating.
  • Free electron fraction Y_fe = 0.0625 (SN); 0.02 (KN)
    Sets the free-free absorption optical depth (Eq. A9-A11), which determines the radio peak time.
  • Average atomic number Z_bar = 8 (SN); 40 (KN)
    Sets both free-free and photoelectric opacity (Eq. A9, A12), affecting radio and soft X-ray escape times.
  • PWN magnetic field partition epsilon_B = 0.01 (Crab-like)
    Sets the synchrotron luminosity of the nebula (Eq. A2-A4); chosen to match Galactic PWNe like the Crab.
  • Electron injection Lorentz factor gamma_b = 1e5
    Sets the characteristic synchrotron frequency (Eq. A3); chosen from Crab-like PWN modeling.
  • Ambient density n_CSM = 1 or 1e-3 cm^-3
    Sets the GRB afterglow and ejecta afterglow peak times and luminosities; two representative values are used.
assumptions (9)
  • standard math Standard synchrotron afterglow closure relations (Sari et al. 1998)
    Used to derive the GRB afterglow peak timescales in Section 2.1 (Eq. 1-4).
  • standard math Free-free absorption opacity formula (Lang 1999)
    Used in Eq. A9 to compute the radio escape time.
  • standard math Photoelectric opacity approximation (Kashiyama et al. 2016)
    Used in Eq. A12 for soft X-ray absorption.
  • domain assumption Spherical, homogeneous ejecta and nebula
    Assumed throughout the modeling; the authors note in Section 4 that most kilonova simulations show large deviations from spherical symmetry.
  • domain assumption Constant-density ambient medium
    Used for both the GRB afterglow and ejecta afterglow (Section 2); not valid for wind or eruptive mass loss.
  • domain assumption Crab-like PWN microphysics (epsilon_B ~ 0.01, gamma_b ~ 1e5)
    Sets the radio luminosity; the authors themselves note in Section 4 that lack of radio counterparts in SLSNe suggests this may not hold.
  • domain assumption Magnetic dipole spin-down with braking index n=3
    Used in Eq. A1 for the spin-down luminosity; other spin-down formalisms are possible.
  • domain assumption Ejecta composition assumptions (oxygen for SN, r-process for KN)
    Sets Y_fe, Z_bar, and Y_e; motivated by nucleosynthesis studies but with significant uncertainty.
  • domain assumption One-zone model; no inverse Compton emission
    The PWN model in Appendix A neglects IC and treats the nebula as a single zone; the authors state this prevents treating the low-magnetization model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-Peaked Non-Thermal Light Curves from Magnetar-Powered Gamma-Ray Bursts." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MHNXPOGJ

@misc{pith2026241212272,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-Peaked Non-Thermal Light Curves from Magnetar-Powered Gamma-Ray Bursts},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MHNXPOGJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.12272}
}
abstract

Binary neutron star mergers and collapsing massive stars can both create millisecond magnetars. Such magnetars are candidate engines to power gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). The non-thermal light curve of the resulting transients can exhibit multiple components, including: the GRB afterglow, pulsar wind nebula (PWN), and ejecta afterglow. We derive the timescales for the peak of each component and show that the PWN is detectable at radio frequencies, dominating the emission for $\sim$ 6 years for supernova/long GRBs (SN/LGRBs) and $\sim$ 100 days for kilonova/short GRBs (KN/SGRBs) at 1 GHz, and $\sim$ 1 year for SN/LGRBs and $\sim$ 15 days for KN/SGRBs at 100 GHz. The PWN emission has an exponential, frequency-dependent rise to peak that cannot be replicated by an ejecta afterglow. We show that PWNe in SN/LGRBs can be detected out to $z \sim 0.06$ with current instruments and $z \sim 0.3$ with next-generation instruments and PWNe in KN/SGRBs can be detected out to $z \sim 0.3$ with current instruments and $z \sim 1.5$ with next-generation instruments. We find that the optimal strategy for detecting PWNe in these systems is a multi-band, high cadence radio follow-up of nearby KN/SGRBs with an x-ray plateau or extended prompt emission from 10 - 100 days post-burst.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.12272 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Non-thermal light curves for our fiducial magnetar-driven supernovae and kilonovae, with on- and off-axis GRBs, in radio and X-ray. Each panel shows the GRB afterglow (blue), PWN (green), ejecta afterglow (red), and total emission (black). The solid and dashed lines indicate the density of the ambient medium 𝑛CSM to be 1 and 10−3 cm−3 respectively. The off-axis afterglow is taken from an observer angle of 32°.The tr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The fitted radio light curve for the simulated kilonova/SGRB for both 1 and 100 GHz. The solid line shows the model with the highest likeli￾hood while the shaded region shows the 90% confidence interval. (Malsiner-Walli & Wagner 2018) on the initial pulsar wind nebula luminosity 𝐿0, which imposes a dirac-delta function onto an already existing prior. We give the spike 10% of the probability of the prior and place it… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The GRB afterglow of GRB170817A in optical, x-ray, and radio (Evans et al. 2017; Hallinan et al. 2017; Haggard et al. 2017; Mooley et al. 2018) and a Gaussian jet light curve model using the median parameters from Lamb et al. (2019a). PWNe from magnetars with 𝐿0 = 1050 (𝐸rot = 1052) and 𝐿0 = 1049 (𝐸rot = 1051) are shown with dashed and dotted lines, respectively, while the afterglow with no PWN is shown with solid l… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: 100 keV light curves for magnetar-driven supernovae and kilonovae with an on-axis GRB and a high-magnetization PWN. Each panel shows the GRB afterglow (blue), PWN (green), ejecta afterglow (red), and total emission (black). The solid and dashed lines indicate the densi…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

235 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    P., Abbott R., Abbott T

    Abbott B. P., Abbott R., Abbott T. D., et al. 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..12A 848, L12

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

  3. [3]

    P., Abbott R., Abbott T

    Abbott B. P., Abbott R., Abbott T. D., et al. 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..13A 848, L13

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c

  4. [4]

    P., Abbott R., Abbott T

    Abbott B. P., Abbott R., Abbott T. D., et al. 2017c, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9478 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850L..39A 850, L39

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9478

  5. [5]

    P., Abbott R., Abbott T

    Abbott B. P., Abbott R., Abbott T. D., et al. 2019, @doi [Physical Review X] 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.011001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PhRvX...9a1001A 9, 011001

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.011001 2019

  6. [6]

    P., Abbott R., Abbott T

    Abbott B. P., Abbott R., Abbott T. D., et al. 2020, @doi [Living Reviews in Relativity] 10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020LRR....23....3A 23, 3

    doi:10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 2020

  7. [7]

    2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac2b7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...860...57A 860, 57

    Ai S., Gao H., Dai Z.-G., et al. 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac2b7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...860...57A 860, 57

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac2b7 2018

  8. [8]

    Ai S., Gao H., Zhang B., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad93b4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...978...52A 978, 52

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad93b4 2025

Show all 235 references
  1. [9]

    2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad11df , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...962...68A 962, 68

    Anand S., Barnes J., Yang S., et al. 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad11df , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...962...68A 962, 68

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    D., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159681 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...253..785A 253, 785

    Arnett W. D., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159681 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...253..785A 253, 785

    1982 doi

  3. [11]

    D., et al

    Ashton G., H \"u bner M., Lasky P. D., et al. 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab06fc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..241...27A 241, 27

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    L., Heussaff V., Dezalay J

    Atteia J. L., Heussaff V., Dezalay J. P., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffa , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837..119A 837, 119

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.18345 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250118345B p

    Banerjee S., Jerkstrand A., Badnell N., et al. 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.18345 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250118345B p. arXiv:2501.18345

    2025 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b41 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...939L..29B 939, L29

    Barnes J., Metzger B. D., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b41 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...939L..29B 939, L29

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    T., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/78 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...773...78B 773, 78

    Bauswein A., Goriely S., Janka H. T., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/78 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...773...78B 773, 78

    2013 doi

  8. [16]

    Bednarek W., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030929 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...407....1B 407, 1

    2003 doi

  9. [17]

    Beniamini P., Gill R., Granot J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1821 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515..555B 515, 555

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    F., Kronberg P

    Bietenholz M. F., Kronberg P. P., Hogg D. E., et al. 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/186051 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...373L..59B 373, L59

    1991 doi

  11. [19]

    D., McKee C

    Blandford R. D., McKee C. F., 1976, @doi [Physics of Fluids] 10.1063/1.861619 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976PhFl...19.1130B 19, 1130

    1976 doi

  12. [20]

    D., McKee C

    Blandford R. D., McKee C. F., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/180.3.343 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977MNRAS.180..343B 180, 343

    1977 doi

  13. [21]

    D., Payne D

    Blandford R. D., Payne D. G., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/199.4.883 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982MNRAS.199..883B 199, 883

    1982 doi

  14. [22]

    D., Znajek R

    Blandford R. D., Znajek R. L., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977MNRAS.179..433B 179, 433

    1977 doi

  15. [23]

    I., Novikov I

    Blinnikov S. I., Novikov I. D., Perevodchikova T. V., et al. 1984, @doi [Soviet Astronomy Letters] 10.48550/arXiv.1808.05287 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984SvAL...10..177B 10, 177

    1984 doi arXiv

  16. [24]

    M., Chevalier R

    Blondin J. M., Chevalier R. A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8267 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...845..139B 845, 139

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    D., Dwarkadas V

    Bochenek C. D., Dwarkadas V. V., Silverman J. M., et al. 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2029 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473..336B 473, 336

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    F., Kaneko Y., G \"o g \"u s E., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts157 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.1623B 428, 1623

    Bostanc Z. F., Kaneko Y., G \"o g \"u s E., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts157 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.428.1623B 428, 1623

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7d83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..213B 975, 213

    Brethauer D., Kasen D., Margutti R., et al. 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7d83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...975..213B 975, 213

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20040360 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...423..253B 423, 253

    Bucciantini N., Amato E., Bandiera R., et al. 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20040360 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...423..253B 423, 253

    2004 doi

  21. [29]

    D., Thompson T

    Bucciantini N., Metzger B. D., Thompson T. A., et al. 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19810.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.419.1537B 419, 1537

    2012

  22. [30]

    2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...564A.125B 564, A125

    Buchner J., Georgakakis A., Nandra K., et al. 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...564A.125B 564, A125

    2014 doi

  23. [31]

    Bugli M., Guilet J., Obergaulinger M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2161 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507..443B 507, 443

    2021 doi

  24. [32]

    2019, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0593-y , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs...3...99B 3, 99

    Bulla M., Covino S., Kyutoku K., et al. 2019, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0593-y , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019NatAs...3...99B 3, 99

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    2017, @doi [Advances in Astronomy] 10.1155/2017/8929054 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AdAst2017E...5C 2017, 8929054

    Cano Z., Wang S.-Q., Dai Z.-G., et al. 2017, @doi [Advances in Astronomy] 10.1155/2017/8929054 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AdAst2017E...5C 2017, 8929054

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    E., Sukhbold T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/73 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832...73C 832, 73

    Chen K.-J., Woosley S. E., Sukhbold T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/832/1/73 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...832...73C 832, 73

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    W., Brennan S

    Chen T. W., Brennan S. J., Wesson R., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021arXiv210907942C p. arXiv:2109.07942

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    A., Fransson C., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/171674 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...395..540C 395, 540

    Chevalier R. A., Fransson C., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/171674 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...395..540C 395, 540

    1992 doi

  29. [37]

    A., Fransson C., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...420..268C 420, 268

    Chevalier R. A., Fransson C., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/173557 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...420..268C 420, 268

    1994 doi

  30. [38]

    H., Murdin P., Wood R., et al

    Clark D. H., Murdin P., Wood R., et al. 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/204.2.415 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983MNRAS.204..415C 204, 415

    1983 doi

  31. [39]

    Corsi A., Ho A. Y. Q., Cenko S. B., et al. 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acd3f2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...953..179C 953, 179

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    G., Nagataki S., Maeda K., et al

    Dainotti M. G., Nagataki S., Maeda K., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628384 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...600A..98D 600, A98

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    G., Duffell P

    Dastidar R. G., Duffell P. C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad86bf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976..252D 976, 252

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    A., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ARA&A..23..119D 23, 119

    Davidson K., Fesen R. A., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ARA&A..23..119D 23, 119

    1985

  35. [43]

    Dessart L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834535 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...621A.141D 621, A141

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    Dessart L., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451983 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A.204D 692, A204

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    2019, in Canadian Long Range Plan for Astronomy and Astrophysics White Papers

    Di Francesco J., Chalmers D., Denman N., et al. 2019, in Canadian Long Range Plan for Astronomy and Astrophysics White Papers. p. 32 ( @eprint arXiv 1911.01517 ), @doi 10.5281/zenodo.3765763

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Di Palma I., Guetta D., Amato E., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836..159D 836, 159

    2017 doi

  39. [47]

    R., Milisavljevic D., Parrent J., et al

    Drout M. R., Milisavljevic D., Parrent J., et al. 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/57 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821...57D 821, 57

    2016 doi

  40. [48]

    DuPont M., MacFadyen A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad66d2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...971L..24D 971, L24

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    C., Thompson C., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/186413 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...392L...9D 392, L9

    Duncan R. C., Thompson C., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/186413 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992ApJ...392L...9D 392, L9

    1992 doi

  42. [50]

    V., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu347 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.440.1917D 440, 1917

    Dwarkadas V. V., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu347 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.440.1917D 440, 1917

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab18a5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876L..10E 876, L10

    Eftekhari T., Berger E., Margalit B., et al. 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab18a5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...876L..10E 876, L10

    2019 doi

  44. [52]

    Eftekhari T., Margalit B., Omand C. M. B., et al. 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abe9b8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...912...21E 912, 21

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    1989, @doi [ ] 10.1038/340126a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989Natur.340..126E 340, 126

    Eichler D., Livio M., Piran T., et al. 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1038/340126a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989Natur.340..126E 340, 126

    1989 doi

  46. [54]

    A., Cenko S

    Evans P. A., Cenko S. B., Kennea J. A., et al. 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aap9580 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1565E 358, 1565

    2017 doi

  47. [55]

    2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...815..102F 815, 102

    Fong W., Berger E., Margutti R., et al. 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...815..102F 815, 102

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    Fong W., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc74a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...906..127F 906, 127

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    E., Dong Y., et al

    Fong W.-f., Nugent A. E., Dong Y., et al. 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac91d0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940...56F 940, 56

    2022 doi

  50. [58]

    D., et al

    Foucart F., Haas R., Duez M. D., et al. 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.044019 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PhRvD..93d4019F 93, 044019

    2016 doi

  51. [59]

    A., Waxman E., Kulkarni S

    Frail D. A., Waxman E., Kulkarni S. R., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309024 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...537..191F 537, 191

    2000 doi

  52. [60]

    A., Soderberg A

    Frail D. A., Soderberg A. M., Kulkarni S. R., et al. 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/426680 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...619..994F 619, 994

    2005 doi

  53. [61]

    J., et al

    Fransson C., Ergon M., Challis P. J., et al. 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...797..118F 797, 118

    2014 doi

  54. [62]

    M., Manchester R

    Gaensler B. M., Manchester R. N., Staveley-Smith L., et al. 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/303917 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...479..845G 479, 845

    1997 doi

  55. [63]

    Gehrels N., M \'e sz \'a ros P., 2012, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1216793 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Sci...337..932G 337, 932

    2012 doi

  56. [64]

    L., et al

    Gendre B., Stratta G., Atteia J. L., et al. 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/30 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...766...30G 766, 30

    2013 doi

  57. [65]

    S., Pescalli A., et al

    Ghirlanda G., Salafia O. S., Pescalli A., et al. 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628993 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...594A..84G 594, A84

    2016 doi

  58. [66]

    L., Wynn G

    Gibson S. L., Wynn G. A., Gompertz B. P., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1531 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.4925G 470, 4925

    2017 doi

  59. [67]

    2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A..20G 685, A20

    Gkini A., Lunnan R., Schulze S., et al. 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A..20G 685, A20

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2270 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535..471G 535, 471

    Gomez S., Nicholl M., Berger E., et al. 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2270 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535..471G 535, 471

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    P., O'Brien P

    Gompertz B. P., O'Brien P. T., Wynn G. A., et al. 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt293 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.431.1745G 431, 1745

    2013 doi

  62. [70]

    P., O'Brien P

    Gompertz B. P., O'Brien P. T., Wynn G. A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2165 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438..240G 438, 240

    2014 doi

  63. [71]

    Granot J., Loeb A., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378262 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...593L..81G 593, L81

    2003 doi

  64. [72]

    E., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340991 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...570L..61G 570, L61

    Granot J., Panaitescu A., Kumar P., Woosley S. E., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340991 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...570L..61G 570, L61

    2002 doi

  65. [73]

    A., Kann D

    Greiner J., Mazzali P. A., Kann D. A., et al. 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature14579 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.523..189G 523, 189

    2015 doi

  66. [74]

    J., et al

    Haggard D., Nynka M., Ruan J. J., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa8ede , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848L..25H 848, L25

    2017 doi

  67. [75]

    S., et al

    Hajela A., Margutti R., Bright J. S., et al. 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac504a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...927L..17H 927, L17

    2022 doi

  68. [76]

    P., et al

    Hallinan G., Corsi A., Mooley K. P., et al. 2017, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.aap9855 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Sci...358.1579H 358, 1579

    2017 doi

  69. [77]

    2019, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society

    Hallinan G., Ravi V., Weinreb S., et al. 2019, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. p. 255 ( @eprint arXiv 1907.07648 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.1907.07648

    2019 doi arXiv

  70. [78]

    I., Bagoly Z., et al

    Horvath I., Racz I. I., Bagoly Z., et al. 2022, @doi [Universe] 10.3390/universe8040221 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022Univ....8..221H 8, 221

    2022 doi

  71. [79]

    2013, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhRvD..87b4001H 87, 024001

    Hotokezaka K., Kiuchi K., Kyutoku K., et al. 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.024001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhRvD..87b4001H 87, 024001

    2013 doi

  72. [80]

    2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/190 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831..190H 831, 190

    Hotokezaka K., Nissanke S., Hallinan G., et al. 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/190 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831..190H 831, 190

    2016 doi

  73. [81]

    2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1975 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.5863H 506, 5863

    Hotokezaka K., Tanaka M., Kato D., et al. 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1975 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.5863H 506, 5863

    2021 doi

  74. [82]

    2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad128 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526L.155H 526, L155

    Hotokezaka K., Tanaka M., Kato D., et al. 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad128 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526L.155H 526, L155

    2023 doi

  75. [83]

    F., Sunyaev R

    Illarionov A. F., Sunyaev R. A., 1975, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975A&A....39..185I 39, 185

    1975

  76. [84]

    A., et al

    Inserra C., Bulla M., Sim S. A., et al. 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/79 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...831...79I 831, 79

    2016 doi

  77. [85]

    Ioka K., Nakamura T., 2018, @doi [Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics] 10.1093/ptep/pty036 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PTEP.2018d3E02I 2018, 043E02

    2018 doi

  78. [86]

    J., Inserra C., et al

    Jerkstrand A., Smartt S. J., Inserra C., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835...13J 835, 13

    2017 doi

  79. [87]

    Jin Z.-P., et al., 2016, @doi [Nature Communications] 10.1038/ncomms12898 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016NatCo...712898J 7, 12898

    2016 doi

  80. [88]

    Jin Z.-P., Covino S., Liao N.-H., Li X., D'Avanzo P., Fan Y.-Z., Wei D.-M., 2020, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-019-0892-y , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020NatAs...4...77J 4, 77

    2020 doi

  81. [89]

    Jun B.-I., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305627 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...499..282J 499, 282

    1998 doi

  82. [90]

    F., G \"o g \"u s E., et al

    Kaneko Y., Bostanc Z. F., G \"o g \"u s E., et al. 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1286 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452..824K 452, 824

    2015 doi

  83. [91]

    2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.1193K 516, 1193

    Kangas T., Yan L., Schulze S., et al. 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2218 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.1193K 516, 1193

    2022 doi

  84. [92]

    2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/94 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818...94K 818, 94

    Kashiyama K., Murase K., Bartos I., et al. 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/94 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818...94K 818, 94

    2016 doi

  85. [93]

    F., Coroniti F

    Kennel C. F., Coroniti F. V., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/162356 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJ...283..694K 283, 694

    1984 doi

  86. [94]

    Klein O., Nishina T., 1929, @doi [Zeitschrift fur Physik] 10.1007/BF01366453 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1929ZPhy...52..853K 52, 853

    1929 doi

  87. [95]

    Kobayashi S., Sari R., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...542..819K 542, 819

    2000 doi

  88. [96]

    Kobayashi S., Piran T., Sari R., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306868 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...513..669K 513, 669

    1999 doi

  89. [97]

    C., Johansson J., Sollerman J., et al

    Kool E. C., Johansson J., Sollerman J., et al. 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-05916-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Natur.617..477K 617, 477

    2023 doi

  90. [98]

    A., Fishman G

    Kouveliotou C., Meegan C. A., Fishman G. J., et al. 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/186969 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...413L.101K 413, L101

    1993 doi

  91. [99]

    arXiv:2503.13291

    Kusafuka Y., Matsuoka T., Sawada R., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2503.13291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250313291K p. arXiv:2503.13291

    2025 doi

  92. [100]

    Kyutoku K., Kashiyama K., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvD..97j3001K 97, 103001

    2018 doi

  93. [101]

    P., Kobayashi S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2345 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.4953L 472, 4953

    Lamb G. P., Kobayashi S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2345 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472.4953L 472, 4953

    2017 doi

  94. [102]

    P., Mandel I., Resmi L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2196 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.2581L 481, 2581

    Lamb G. P., Mandel I., Resmi L., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2196 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.2581L 481, 2581

    2018 doi

  95. [103]

    P., Lyman J

    Lamb G. P., Lyman J. D., Levan A. J., et al. 2019a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf96b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...870L..15L 870, L15

    doi

  96. [104]

    P., et al., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab38bb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883...48L 883, 48

    Lamb G. P., et al., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab38bb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...883...48L 883, 48

    doi

  97. [105]

    2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508...52L 508, 52

    Lan G.-X., Wei J.-J., Zeng H.-D., et al. 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508...52L 508, 52

    2021 doi

  98. [106]

    R., 1999, Astrophysical formulae

    Lang K. R., 1999, Astrophysical formulae

    1999

  99. [107]

    D., Leris C., Rowlinson A., et al

    Lasky P. D., Leris C., Rowlinson A., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa79a7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843L...1L 843, L1

    2017 doi

  100. [108]

    M., Schramm D

    Lattimer J. M., Schramm D. N., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/154860 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...210..549L 210, 549

    1976 doi

  101. [109]

    J., Omand C

    Law C. J., Omand C. M. B., Kashiyama K., et al. 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4adb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886...24L 886, 24

    2019 doi

  102. [110]

    J., Read A

    Levan A. J., Read A. M., Metzger B. D., et al. 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/771/2/136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...771..136L 771, 136

    2013 doi

  103. [111]

    J., Tanvir N

    Levan A. J., Tanvir N. R., Starling R. L. C., et al. 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781...13L 781, 13

    2014 doi

  104. [112]

    J., Gompertz B

    Levan A. J., Gompertz B. P., Salafia O. S., et al. 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-023-06759-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Natur.626..737L 626, 737

    2024 doi

  105. [113]

    M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425498 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...614L..17L 614, L17

    Li Z., Song L. M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425498 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...614L..17L 614, L17

    2004 doi

  106. [114]

    F., et al

    Lippuner J., Fern \'a ndez R., Roberts L. F., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1987 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472..904L 472, 904

    2017 doi

  107. [115]

    Lovelace R. V. E., Romanova M. M., Bisnovatyi-Kogan G. S., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/306945 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...514..368L 514, 368

    1999 doi

  108. [116]

    D., Lamb G

    Lyman J. D., Lamb G. P., Levan A. J., et al. 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0511-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2..751L 2, 751

    2018 doi

  109. [117]

    A., Ansoldi S., et al

    MAGIC Collaboration Acciari V. A., Ansoldi S., et al. 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-019-1754-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.575..459M 575, 459

    2019 doi

  110. [118]

    I., Woosley S

    MacFadyen A. I., Woosley S. E., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307790 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...524..262M 524, 262

    1999 doi

  111. [119]

    I., Woosley S

    MacFadyen A. I., Woosley S. E., Heger A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/319698 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...550..410M 550, 410

    2001 doi

  112. [120]

    2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/324487 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...565..405M 565, 405

    Maeda K., Nakamura T., Nomoto K., et al. 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/324487 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...565..405M 565, 405

    2002 doi

  113. [121]

    arXiv:1812.07259

    Malsiner-Walli G., Wagner H., 2018, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.1812.07259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018arXiv181207259M p. arXiv:1812.07259

    2018 doi arXiv

  114. [122]

    D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2ae2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880L..15M 880, L15

    Margalit B., Metzger B. D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2ae2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...880L..15M 880, L15

    2019 doi

  115. [123]

    Margalit B., Piran T., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1486 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.4981M 495, 4981

    2020 doi

  116. [124]

    D., Berger E., et al

    Margalit B., Metzger B. D., Berger E., et al. 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2417 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.2407M 481, 2407

    2018 doi

  117. [125]

    Margutti R., Chornock R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-030742 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ARA&A..59..155M 59, 155

    2021 doi

  118. [126]

    D., et al

    Margutti R., Chornock R., Metzger B. D., et al. 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad2df , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...864...45M 864, 45

    2018 doi

  119. [127]

    S., Matthews D

    Margutti R., Bright J. S., Matthews D. J., et al. 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acf1fd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954L..45M 954, L45

    2023 doi

  120. [128]

    A., McFadyen A

    Mazzali P. A., McFadyen A. I., Woosley S. E., et al. 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443...67M 443, 67

    2014 doi

  121. [129]

    2019, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society

    McKinnon M., Beasley A., Murphy E., et al. 2019, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. p. 81

    2019

  122. [130]

    M \'e sz \'a ros P., 2006, @doi [Reports on Progress in Physics] 10.1088/0034-4885/69/8/R01 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006RPPh...69.2259M 69, 2259

    2006 doi

  123. [131]

    D., 2019, @doi [Living Reviews in Relativity] 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019LRR....23....1M 23, 1

    Metzger B. D., 2019, @doi [Living Reviews in Relativity] 10.1007/s41114-019-0024-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019LRR....23....1M 23, 1

    2019 doi

  124. [132]

    D., Fern \'a ndez R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu802 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441.3444M 441, 3444

    Metzger B. D., Fern \'a ndez R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu802 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441.3444M 441, 3444

    2014 doi

  125. [133]

    D., Piro A

    Metzger B. D., Piro A. L., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu247 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439.3916M 439, 3916

    2014 doi

  126. [134]

    D., Quataert E., Thompson T

    Metzger B. D., Quataert E., Thompson T. A., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12923.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.385.1455M 385, 1455

    2008

  127. [135]

    D., Vurm I., Hasco \"e t R., et al

    Metzger B. D., Vurm I., Hasco \"e t R., et al. 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1922 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437..703M 437, 703

    2014 doi

  128. [136]

    M., Margutti R., et al

    Milisavljevic D., Soderberg A. M., Margutti R., et al. 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/770/2/L38 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...770L..38M 770, L38

    2013 doi

  129. [137]

    J., Chevalier R

    Milisavljevic D., Patnaude D. J., Chevalier R. A., et al. 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aadd4e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...864L..36M 864, L36

    2018 doi

  130. [138]

    2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2637 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.3863M 498, 3863

    Mondal S., Bera A., Chandra P., et al. 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2637 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.3863M 498, 3863

    2020 doi

  131. [139]

    P., Nakar E., Hotokezaka K., et al

    Mooley K. P., Nakar E., Hotokezaka K., et al. 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature25452 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.554..207M 554, 207

    2018 doi

  132. [140]

    2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abb6ef , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...901L..37M 901, L37

    M \"o sta P., Radice D., Haas R., et al. 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abb6ef , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...901L..37M 901, L37

    2020 doi

  133. [141]

    2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805...82M 805, 82

    Murase K., Kashiyama K., Kiuchi K., et al. 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/82 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805...82M 805, 82

    2015 doi

  134. [142]

    Murase K., Kashiyama K., M \'e sz \'a ros P., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx310 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.3542M 467, 3542

    2017 doi

  135. [143]

    W., Fang K., et al

    Murase K., Toomey M. W., Fang K., et al. 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa48a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854...60M 854, 60

    2018 doi

  136. [144]

    Murase K., Omand C. M. B., Coppejans D. L., et al. 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2506 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508...44M 508, 44

    2021 doi

  137. [145]

    Nakar E., Piran T., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature10365 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Natur.478...82N 478, 82

    2011 doi

  138. [146]

    Nakar E., Piran T., Granot J., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342791 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...579..699N 579, 699

    2002 doi

  139. [147]

    2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...778...67N 778, 67

    Nakauchi D., Kashiyama K., Suwa Y., et al. 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...778...67N 778, 67

    2013 doi

  140. [148]

    2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3337 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.1772N 500, 1772

    Nativi L., Bulla M., Rosswog S., et al. 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3337 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.500.1772N 500, 1772

    2021 doi

  141. [149]

    P., Rosswog S., et al

    Nativi L., Lamb G. P., Rosswog S., et al. 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2982 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509..903N 509, 903

    2022 doi

  142. [150]

    Nicholl M., Guillochon J., Berger E., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9334 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850...55N 850, 55

    2017 doi

  143. [151]

    P., Bonnell J

    Norris J. P., Bonnell J. T., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/502796 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...643..266N 643, 266

    2006 doi

  144. [152]

    A., Kouveliotou C., Grupe D., et al

    Nousek J. A., Kouveliotou C., Grupe D., et al. 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500724 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..389N 642, 389

    2006 doi

  145. [153]

    E., Fong W.-F., Dong Y., et al

    Nugent A. E., Fong W.-F., Dong Y., et al. 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac91d1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940...57N 940, 57

    2022 doi

  146. [154]

    T., Willingale R., Osborne J., et al

    O'Brien P. T., Willingale R., Osborne J., et al. 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505457 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...647.1213O 647, 1213

    2006 doi

  147. [155]

    Omand C. M. B., Jerkstrand A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245406 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A.107O 673, A107

    2023 doi

  148. [156]

    Omand C. M. B., Sarin N., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3645 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.6455O 527, 6455

    2024 doi

  149. [157]

    Omand C. M. B., Kashiyama K., Murase K., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2743 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474..573O 474, 573

    2018 doi

  150. [158]

    Omand C. M. B., Kashiyama K., Murase K., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz371 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.5468O 484, 5468

    2019 doi

  151. [159]

    Omand C. M. B., Sarin N., Temim T., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2585 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536..408O 536, 408

    2025 doi

  152. [160]

    E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...418L...5P 418, L5

    Paczynski B., Rhoads J. E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...418L...5P 418, L5

    1993 doi

  153. [161]

    J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305995 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...503..314P 503, 314

    Panaitescu A., M \'e sz \'a ros P., Rees M. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305995 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...503..314P 503, 314

    1998 doi

  154. [162]

    Piran T., 2004, @doi [Reviews of Modern Physics] 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1143 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004RvMP...76.1143P 76, 1143

    2004 doi

  155. [163]

    2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3047 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.1912P 483, 1912

    Piro L., Troja E., Zhang B., et al. 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3047 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.1912P 483, 1912

    2019 doi

  156. [164]

    2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.5220P 526, 5220

    Pognan Q., Grumer J., Jerkstrand A., et al. 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.5220P 526, 5220

    2023 doi

  157. [165]

    2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2778 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.2973P 536, 2973

    Pognan Q., Wu M.-R., Mart \' nez-Pinedo G., et al. 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2778 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.2973P 536, 2973

    2025 doi

  158. [166]

    Poidevin F., Omand C. M. B., P \'e rez-Fournon I., et al. 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac425 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.5948P 511, 5948

    2022 doi

  159. [167]

    Poidevin F., Omand C. M. B., K \"o nyves-T \'o th R., et al. 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad830 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.5418P 521, 5418

    2023 doi

  160. [168]

    E., Fryer C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...518..356P 518, 356

    Popham R., Woosley S. E., Fryer C., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...518..356P 518, 356

    1999 doi

  161. [169]

    S., Keppens R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1082 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443..547P 443, 547

    Porth O., Komissarov S. S., Keppens R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1082 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.443..547P 443, 547

    2014 doi

  162. [170]

    2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243256 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A..30P 666, A30

    Pursiainen M., Leloudas G., Paraskeva E., et al. 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243256 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A..30P 666, A30

    2022 doi

  163. [171]

    2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202345945 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A..81P 674, A81

    Pursiainen M., Leloudas G., Cikota A., et al. 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202345945 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A..81P 674, A81

    2023 doi

  164. [172]

    C., Gompertz B

    Rastinejad J. C., Gompertz B. P., Levan A. J., et al. 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-022-05390-w , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022Natur.612..223R 612, 223

    2022 doi

  165. [173]

    J., Meszaros P., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/258.1.41P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.258P..41R 258, 41

    Rees M. J., Meszaros P., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/258.1.41P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.258P..41R 258, 41

    1992 doi

  166. [174]

    J., M \'e sz \'a ros P., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311244 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...496L...1R 496, L1

    Rees M. J., M \'e sz \'a ros P., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311244 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...496L...1R 496, L1

    1998 doi

  167. [175]

    F., Lippuner J., Duez M

    Roberts L. F., Lippuner J., Duez M. D., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2622 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464.3907R 464, 3907

    2017 doi

  168. [176]

    M., Ustyugova G

    Romanova M. M., Ustyugova G. V., Koldoba A. V., et al. 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/499560 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...635L.165R 635, L165

    2005 doi

  169. [177]

    J., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05363.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.332..945R 332, 945

    Rossi E., Lazzati D., Rees M. J., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05363.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.332..945R 332, 945

    2002

  170. [178]

    2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2502 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439..744R 439, 744

    Rosswog S., Korobkin O., Arcones A., et al. 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2502 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439..744R 439, 744

    2014 doi

  171. [179]

    2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae454 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.2336R 530, 2336

    Rosswog S., Diener P., Torsello F., et al. 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae454 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.2336R 530, 2336

    2024 doi

  172. [180]

    T., Metzger B

    Rowlinson A., O'Brien P. T., Metzger B. D., et al. 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts683 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.1061R 430, 1061

    2013 doi

  173. [181]

    J., et al

    Saito S., Tanaka M., Moriya T. J., et al. 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab873b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...894..154S 894, 154

    2020 doi

  174. [182]

    Sari R., Piran T., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309835 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...455L.143S 455, L143

    1995 doi

  175. [183]

    Sari R., Piran T., Narayan R., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311269 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...497L..17S 497, L17

    1998 doi

  176. [184]

    D., 2021, @doi [General Relativity and Gravitation] 10.1007/s10714-021-02831-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021GReGr..53...59S 53, 59

    Sarin N., Lasky P. D., 2021, @doi [General Relativity and Gravitation] 10.1007/s10714-021-02831-1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021GReGr..53...59S 53, 59

    2021 doi

  177. [185]

    Sarin N., Rosswog S., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad739d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...973L..24S 973, L24

    2024 doi

  178. [186]

    D., Ashton G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf9a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872..114S 872, 114

    Sarin N., Lasky P. D., Ashton G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf9a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872..114S 872, 114

    2019 doi

  179. [187]

    D., Ashton G., 2020a, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PhRvD.101f3021S 101, 063021

    Sarin N., Lasky P. D., Ashton G., 2020a, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PhRvD.101f3021S 101, 063021

    doi

  180. [188]

    D., Ashton G., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3090 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.5986S 499, 5986

    Sarin N., Lasky P. D., Ashton G., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3090 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.5986S 499, 5986

    doi

  181. [189]

    Sarin N., Omand C. M. B., Margalit B., et al. 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2609 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516.4949S 516, 4949

    2022 doi

  182. [190]

    Sarin N., H \"u bner M., Omand C. M. B., Setzer C. N., et al. 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1238 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531.1203S 531, 1203

    2024 doi

  183. [191]

    2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abb407 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...902...82S 902, 82

    Schroeder G., Margalit B., Fong W.-f., et al. 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abb407 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...902...82S 902, 82

    2020 doi

  184. [192]

    F., 2011, @doi [Classical and Quantum Gravity] 10.1088/0264-9381/28/12/125023 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011CQGra..28l5023S 28, 125023

    Schutz B. F., 2011, @doi [Classical and Quantum Gravity] 10.1088/0264-9381/28/12/125023 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011CQGra..28l5023S 28, 125023

    2011 doi

  185. [193]

    M., Metzger B

    Siegel D. M., Metzger B. D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.231102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017PhRvL.119w1102S 119, 231102

    2017 doi

  186. [194]

    M., Barnes J., Metzger B

    Siegel D. M., Barnes J., Metzger B. D., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-019-1136-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.569..241S 569, 241

    2019 doi

  187. [195]

    2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/591021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...686..467S 686, 467

    Smith N., Chornock R., Li W., et al. 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/591021 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...686..467S 686, 467

    2008 doi

  188. [196]

    P., Yang S., Anand S., et al

    Srinivasaragavan G. P., Yang S., Anand S., et al. 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7fde , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976...71S 976, 71

    2024 doi

  189. [197]

    G., Dall'Osso S., et al

    Stratta G., Dainotti M. G., Dall'Osso S., et al. 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aadd8f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869..155S 869, 155

    2018 doi

  190. [198]

    Sun L., Xiao L., Li G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1121 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.4057S 513, 4057

    2022 doi

  191. [199]

    Suzuki A., Maeda K., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw3259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.466.2633S 466, 2633

    2017 doi

  192. [200]

    Suzuki A., Maeda K., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abd54c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...908..217S 908, 217

    2021 doi

  193. [201]

    2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...621A..71T 621, A71

    Taddia F., Sollerman J., Fremling C., et al. 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...621A..71T 621, A71

    2019 doi

  194. [202]

    Takahashi K., Ioka K., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab032 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.5746T 501, 5746

    2021 doi

  195. [203]

    Takami H., Nozawa T., Ioka K., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/789/1/L6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...789L...6T 789, L6

    2014 doi

  196. [204]

    J., Takahara F., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/715/2/1248 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...715.1248T 715, 1248

    Tanaka S. J., Takahara F., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/715/2/1248 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...715.1248T 715, 1248

    2010 doi

  197. [205]

    J., Takahara F., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts528 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.2945T 429, 2945

    Tanaka S. J., Takahara F., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts528 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.2945T 429, 2945

    2013 doi

  198. [206]

    A., et al

    Tanaka M., Maeda K., Mazzali P. A., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6035 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837..105T 837, 105

    2017 doi

  199. [207]

    2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.1369T 496, 1369

    Tanaka M., Kato D., Gaigalas G., et al. 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.1369T 496, 1369

    2020 doi

  200. [208]

    R., Levan A

    Tanvir N. R., Levan A. J., Fruchter A. S., Hjorth J., Hounsell R. A., Wiersema K., Tunnicliffe R. L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature12505 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Natur.500..547T 500, 547

    2013 doi

  201. [209]

    Temim T., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/507076 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....132.1610T 132, 1610

    2006 doi

  202. [210]

    T., et al

    Troja E., Cusumano G., O'Brien P. T., et al. 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/519450 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...665..599T 665, 599

    2007 doi

  203. [211]

    2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3533 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.1902T 510, 1902

    Troja E., O'Connor B., Ryan G., et al. 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3533 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.1902T 510, 1902

    2022 doi

  204. [212]

    L., Zhang B., Hasco \"e t R., et al

    Uhm Z. L., Zhang B., Hasco \"e t R., et al. 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/147 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...761..147U 761, 147

    2012 doi

  205. [213]

    A., Guillochon J., Berger E., et al

    Villar V. A., Guillochon J., Berger E., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa9c84 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...851L..21V 851, L21

    2017 doi

  206. [214]

    D., Metzger B

    Vlasov A. D., Metzger B. D., Lippuner J., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx478 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468.1522V 468, 1522

    2017 doi

  207. [215]

    D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0826 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...917...77V 917, 77

    Vurm I., Metzger B. D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0826 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...917...77V 917, 77

    2021 doi

  208. [216]

    F., Sarin N., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.07539 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240907539W p

    Wallace W. F., Sarin N., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2409.07539 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240907539W p. arXiv:2409.07539

    2024 doi arXiv

  209. [217]

    F., Kong S

    Wang X., Huang Y. F., Kong S. W., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811612 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...505.1213W 505, 1213

    2009 doi

  210. [218]

    2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..219....9W 219, 9

    Wang X.-G., Zhang B., Liang E.-W., et al. 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..219....9W 219, 9

    2015 doi

  211. [219]

    J., Yu H., Liu L

    Wang L. J., Yu H., Liu L. D., et al. 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ff5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...837..128W 837, 128

    2017 doi

  212. [220]

    L., Lunnan R., Omand C

    West S. L., Lunnan R., Omand C. M. B., et al. 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244086 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...670A...7W 670, A7

    2023 doi

  213. [221]

    Xie X., Zrake J., MacFadyen A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aacf9c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...863...58X 863, 58

    2018 doi

  214. [222]

    2021, GRB Coordinates Network, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021GCN.30357....1X 30357, 1

    Xu D., Izzo L., de Ugarte Postigo A., et al. 2021, GRB Coordinates Network, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021GCN.30357....1X 30357, 1

    2021

  215. [223]

    Yang B., et al., 2015, @doi [Nature Communications] 10.1038/ncomms8323 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NatCo...6.7323Y 6, 7323

    2015 doi

  216. [224]

    Yu Y.-W., Zhang B., Gao H., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/776/2/L40 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/Yu2013 776, L40

    2013 doi

  217. [225]

    Yu Y.-W., Liu L.-D., Dai Z.-G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac6e5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...861..114Y 861, 114

    2018 doi

  218. [226]

    Zhang B., 2018, The Physics of Gamma-Ray Bursts , @doi 10.1017/9781139226530

    2018 doi

  219. [227]

    Zhang W., MacFadyen A., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/698/2/1261 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...698.1261Z 698, 1261

    2009 doi

  220. [228]

    Zhang B., M \'e sz \'a ros P., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/338247 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...566..712Z 566, 712

    2002 doi

  221. [229]

    Zhang B., M \'e sz \'a ros P., 2004, @doi [International Journal of Modern Physics A] 10.1142/S0217751X0401746X , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004IJMPA..19.2385Z 19, 2385

    2004 doi

  222. [230]

    Z., Dyks J., et al

    Zhang B., Fan Y. Z., Dyks J., et al. 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500723 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..354Z 642, 354

    2006 doi

  223. [231]

    Zhou H., Jin Z.-P., Covino S., Lei L., An Y., Gong H.-Y., Fan Y.-Z., Wei D.-M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acac9b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...943..104Z 943, 104

    2023 doi

  224. [232]

    Zhu Y.-M., Zhou H., Wang Y., Liao N.-H., Jin Z.-P., Wei D.-M., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad541 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521..269Z 521, 269

    2023 doi

  225. [233]

    J., et al

    de Wet S., Laskar T., Groot P. J., et al. 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad77bb , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...974..279D 974, 279

    2024 doi

  226. [234]

    D., Weiler K

    van Dyk S. D., Weiler K. W., Sramek R. A., et al. 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187525 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...432L.115V 432, L115

    1994 doi

  227. [235]

    van Eerten H., van der Horst A., MacFadyen A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/44 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...749...44V 749, 44

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.