Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

An Entropy Stable High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Method on Cut Meshes

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper presents the first high-order, entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin method that works on cut meshes with arbitrarily shaped elements.

desk verdict Genuine first for entropy stable DG on cut meshes, but the convergence study and pruning formula need correction before the claims are fully supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13002 v1 pith:HU6GKCTG submitted 2024-12-17 math.NA cs.NA

Christina G. Taylor , Jesse Chan This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NA MSC 65M6065M1265D32
keywords entropystabilitydiscontinuousGalerkincutmeshessummation-by-partsoperatorsCarathéodorypruningquadraturehyperbolicconservationlawsembeddedboundaries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish the first high-order accurate scheme that is entropy stable on cut meshes: grids containing arbitrarily shaped elements produced when embedded boundaries slice a Cartesian background mesh. Entropy stability is the nonlinear analogue of energy stability for hyperbolic conservation laws, and it has been available for simplicial and tensor-product elements but not for cut elements, whose arbitrary shapes defeat standard quadrature assumptions. The authors show that a skew-hybridized summation-by-parts formulation only needs polynomially exact, non-negative-weight quadrature rules on each cut element, and they construct such rules by subtriangulating each cut element and then pruning the composite rule with a Carathéodory-based algorithm. If the construction holds for every possible cut, then robustness, high-order accuracy, and efficiency on embedded-boundary domains can be combined without artificial stabilization. The claim is verified numerically for the shallow water and compressible Euler equations, including shock waves and sharp airfoil geometry.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the skew-hybridized summation-by-parts operator, a block operator built from a non-symmetric differentiation matrix $Q_d$, an extrapolation operator $E$ mapping volume quadrature values to surface points, and a boundary integration matrix $B_d$, arranged so that the operator plus its transpose equals a boundary-only matrix. It carries the argument because it restores summation-by-parts on arbitrary element shapes without requiring the diagonal mass matrix of classical SBP theory. The second mechanism is Carathéodory pruning: starting from an exact positive-weight composite rule obtained by subtriangulation, repeatedly subtract a null vector of the quadrature Vandermonde matrix to zero out weights while preserving exactness and non-negativity, stopping at the Carathéodory bound. This produces the small, positive-weight volume and surface rules that the skew-hybridized operator needs on every cut element.

What would settle it

Construct a family of degenerate cut elements, such as near-zero-area slivers, cuts that pass almost through a mesh vertex, and cuts that intersect a background cell in several disjoint pieces, run the subtriangulation and Carathéodory pruning for increasing polynomial degree $N$, and check exactness of degree $2N-1$ integrals, non-negativity of all weights, and positive-definiteness of the mass matrix. A single geometry in which the pruned rule has fewer than $\mathrm{dim}(P_N)$ strictly positive weights, or in which a mass-matrix eigenvalue becomes zero or negative, would disprove the general claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On cut meshes, classical diagonal-norm summation-by-parts operators are impractical because every cut element has a different shape and cannot be mapped to one reference element. The paper's central claim is that the skew-hybridized summation-by-parts operator satisfies the hybridized SBP property and needs only two things: volume quadrature exact for polynomials of degree $2N-1$ and surface quadrature exact for polynomials of degree $2N$, with non-negative weights and enough positive weights to keep the mass matrix positive definite. Because no special orthogonality is imposed on the mass matrix, these rules can be built individually for each cut element by splitting it into curved triangles, composing known reference-triangle rules, and pruning the many-point rule using null vectors of the quadrature Vandermonde matrix until the Carathéodory bound of at most $N^*+1$ points is reached. The scheme then uses entropy conservative or entropy stable two-point fluxes on the pruned quadrature points and delivers semi-discrete entropy conservation or stability at high order. In the authors' words, this constitutes the first instance of a high-order accurate entropy stable method on cut meshes.

Load-bearing premise

The entire entropy-stability guarantee rests on the assumption that, for every cut element, the pruning algorithm returns a quadrature rule that is exact to the required degree, keeps all weights non-negative, and leaves enough strictly positive weights for the mass matrix to remain positive definite; the paper constructs such rules numerically but does not prove that pruning always terminates successfully on degenerate cut shapes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • High-order entropy stability is no longer restricted to fitted simplicial or tensor-product meshes; embedded-boundary domains can use coarse Cartesian cut meshes without artificial viscosity or tuned limiters.
  • The same formulation applies to any hyperbolic conservation law of the form in Equation (1), so the shallow-water and compressible-Euler demonstrations should transfer to other systems that admit an entropy-entropy flux pair.
  • Because cut meshes have fewer faces than equivalent quad-tri meshes, the scheme reduces the dominant cost of flux-differencing, which is the number of numerical flux evaluations.
  • State redistribution, the standard fix for the small-cell CFL problem, can be applied to the entropy stable version of this method and is observed numerically not to destroy entropy stability.
  • The h-convergence study recovers order $N+1$ in $L^2$ for $N=2,3,4$, matching the expected high-order DG accuracy on cut meshes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same subtriangulation-plus-pruning construction should port to three-dimensional cut meshes by subtetrahedralization, provided the geometric-mapping degree and quadrature-exactness conditions scale; this extension is not demonstrated in the paper.
  • Beyond the paper: the observed compatibility between state redistribution and entropy stability suggests a target theorem, namely that the projection and averaging steps of state redistribution are entropy-dissipative or entropy-bounded for entropy stable fluxes; if proven, the small-cell restriction would be removable while retaining the stability guarantee.
  • Beyond the paper: the method inherits the explicit boundary parameterization used to build the cut mesh; switching to a polynomial level-set representation would allow a different quadrature construction, but the surface-rule exactness conditions and the entropy argument would have to be re-verified for that representation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for hyperbolic conservation laws on Cartesian cut meshes and claims it is entropy stable. The method combines skew-hybridized summation-by-parts operators from Chan [1] with flux-differencing and entropy conservative/stable two-point fluxes. Quadrature rules on arbitrarily shaped cut elements are constructed by subtriangulation followed by Carathéodory pruning. The authors verify the method numerically with the shallow water and compressible Euler equations, including entropy residual tests, an h-convergence study with manufactured solutions, and several benchmark problems with state redistribution.

Significance. If the central claim is fully supported, this is a meaningful advance: it would be the first entropy stable high-order DG scheme on cut meshes, combining nonlinear stability at arbitrary order with the geometric flexibility of cut-cell meshes. The paper has several concrete strengths: it builds on a parameter-free skew-hybridized SBP framework with explicit assumptions, it provides open-source Julia packages and a reproducibility repository, and the numerical experiments include round-off-level entropy conservation for the entropy conservative scheme, non-positive entropy residuals for the entropy stable scheme, and convergence checks for N=2,3,4. However, two load-bearing points need attention before the claim can be accepted: the quadrature-pruning argument does not prove the conditions needed for positive-definiteness of the mass matrix on arbitrary cut elements, and the manufactured-solution convergence study as written omits the source term required by the proposed solution.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.1.4 and Appendix] The entropy stability proof requires a positive-definite mass matrix M in Eq. (29), which is used to define Pq in Eq. (32). Section 2.1.4 states that this holds if quadrature weights are non-negative and enough weights are strictly positive, and the Appendix concludes that this condition is 'typically easily met'. This is not a proof, and it is load-bearing: the final Carathéodory-pruned rule is only guaranteed by Theorem 1.4 to have at most dim(P_N)+1 non-negative weights, not that the corresponding points are unisolvent for P_N. The iterative update in Eqs. (68)-(73) preserves exactness and non-negativity under one step, but the paper does not prove that repeated pruning terminates with at least dim(P_N) strictly positive weights whose points form a unisolvent set, nor does it state geometric assumptions under which this is guaranteed. Since the central claim is stated for cut meshes generally, the proof should either establish this property under explicit, verifiable assumptions or the claim should be qualified accordingly.
  2. [§3.3, Eqs. (51) and (58)] The manufactured solution does not satisfy the homogeneous shallow water equations stated in Eq. (51). Substituting h = sin(2πx)sin(2πy)cos(πt)+3, u1=u2=1 into the continuity equation gives a nonzero residual: ∂h/∂t + ∂(hu1)/∂x + ∂(hu2)/∂y = -π sin(2πx)sin(2πy)sin(πt) + 2π cos(2πx)sin(2πy)cos(πt) + 2π sin(2πx)cos(2πy)cos(πt). The paper never introduces or specifies a source term for this manufactured solution. As written, therefore, the h-convergence study in Figure 8 does not verify the scheme for the stated equations. The authors should state the source term explicitly, explain how it is discretized, and if any code used a source term, this must be documented.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix, Eqs. (68)-(70)] The definition α+ = max_{Δwi>0} w_i/Δwi is not the bound needed if one wants to prune a positive-Δw weight; the correct bound is min_{Δwi>0} w_i/Δwi. As printed, α = min{α-, α+} always equals α- because α- ≤ 0 ≤ α+, so the α+ formula is inert and potentially misleading. Please clarify whether the algorithm intentionally always prunes a negative-Δw weight or whether the positive-side formula is a typo.
  2. [§2.2] The construction of the reference-triangle quadrature rules used after the geometric mapping is not described. Table 1 lists integrand degrees up to 134 for N=8, but the paper does not state which quadrature rules or libraries are used to achieve exactness at those degrees; this information is needed for reproducibility and for assessing the practical cost of the method.
  3. [§3.3] The convergence study reports only a log-log plot. Adding a table with L2 errors, orders of convergence, and the corresponding mesh parameters would make the verification more transparent and easier to reproduce.
  4. [Eq. (59)] The displayed equation for the entropy wave reduction is typeset in a confusing way; the scalar advection equation ∂ρ/∂t + u1∂ρ/∂x + u2∂ρ/∂y = 0 should be displayed separately from the vector-valued momentum/energy relations.
  5. [Conclusions] The statement that the method 'can be adapted to any hyperbolic conservation law taking the form in Equation (1)' should be qualified: the construction requires an entropy-entropy flux pair, an entropy conservative/stable two-point flux, and the quadrature conditions discussed in Section 2.1.4.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the entropy-stable cut-mesh scheme is an application of an independent, parameter-free SBP framework to newly constructed quadrature rules, with no fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation reduces to the skew-hybridized SBP framework of Chan [1,26]. That framework is a parameter-free external result whose stated assumptions (exact quadrature of degrees 2N-1 and 2N, non-negative weights, positive-definite mass matrix) do not include the target result of entropy stability on cut meshes, so citing it is independent support rather than circularity. The cut-mesh contribution is the construction of quadrature rules by subtriangulation and Carathéodory pruning, which is then verified against manufactured solutions, an analytic entropy wave, and standard airfoil/dam-break benchmarks; no parameter is fitted to force those outcomes. The possible issues in the appendix's pruning formula (alpha+ uses max where a min is required to maintain non-negativity) and the omitted source term in the Section 3.3 manufactured-solution study are correctness/support concerns, not circular reductions of the claimed result to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim introduces no fitted constants and no new physical entities. The method inherits its entropy stability proof from the skew-hybridized SBP theory of [1]; the only new numerical ingredient is the quadrature pipeline, whose assumptions are listed above. The wave-speed parameter in the Lax-Friedrichs flux is estimated by the standard Davis formula, not tuned to match the experiments.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Skew-hybridized SBP operators (Eq. 38) satisfy the hybridized SBP property and yield an entropy stable/conservative semi-discrete scheme (Eq. 40) when QH,d 1 = 0 and quadrature exactness conditions hold.
    Used in Sections 2.1.3 and 2.1.4; proved in Chan [1] and [26] with stated assumptions, not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Cut boundaries are given by explicit parameterizations and each cut element is triangulated into curved triangles with isogeometric polynomial mappings of degree N.
    Section 2.2; inherited from the authors' previous cut-mesh framework [45]; needed for the pullback degree calculation in Eq. (49).
  • domain assumption Carathéodory pruning preserves polynomial exactness and non-negative weights and can reduce any exact composite rule to the Carathéodory bound while retaining enough positive weights for a positive-definite mass matrix.
    Appendix 6 and Section 2.2; the QR null-vector algorithm comes from van den Bos [51], but termination and robustness for arbitrary degenerate cut elements are not proven.
  • standard math The numerical fluxes from Trixi.jl (Wintermeyer shallow-water flux, Ranocha Euler flux, Lax-Friedrichs with Davis wave speed) are entropy conservative/stable as published.
    Section 3.1; standard published fluxes, but their entropy properties are imported rather than verified inside this paper.
  • standard math Reflective wall boundary conditions are entropy conservative.
    Used in Sections 3.2 and 3.5; cited to Svärd and Özcan [69].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Entropy Stable High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Method on Cut Meshes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HU6GKCTG

@misc{pith2026241213002,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Entropy Stable High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Method on Cut Meshes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HU6GKCTG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13002}
}
read the original abstract

High-order entropy stable summation-by-parts (SBP) schemes are a class of robust and accurate numerical methods for hyperbolic conservation laws that are numerically stable at arbitrary order without the need for artificial stabilization. While SBP schemes are well-established on simplicial and tensor-product elements, they have not been extended to cut meshes. Cut meshes provide a convenient and efficient means of mesh generation for domains with embedded boundaries but can be difficult to use due to their arbitrarily shaped cut elements. Using the skew-hybridized SBP formulation of Chan ["Skew-symmetric entropy stable...", JSC, 2019], we present a high-order accurate, entropy stable scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws on cut meshes. The formulation requires positive/non-negative weight quadrature rules on cut elements, which we construct via explicit parameterizations, subtriangulations, and Caratheodory pruning. We numerically verify the accuracy and stability of our method using the shallow water and compressible Euler equations and note promising results for the use of state redistribution with entropy stable methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.13002 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An example of a domain with embedded boundaries. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An example of a Cartesian cut mesh with cut elements shown in purple and yellow. Notice that for an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An example of the subtriangulation process used on each cut element mapping a subtraingle to the reference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The initial water height for the entropy residual experiments. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The entropy residual for the entropy conservative scheme without (5a) and with (5b) state redistribution. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The entropy residual for the entropy stable scheme both with (orange curve) and without (blue curve) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Water height for the manufactured solution at time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: L2 error versus mesh size h for solutions of degree N = 2, 3, 4 for the h-convergence study. 3.4. Benchmark Problem: Entropy Wave Here we consider an analytic solution to the compressible Euler equations. When initialized with constant velocity and pressure, the compre…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Snapshots of the density (left column) and error of the density (right column) for the entropy wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Unscaled geometry of the biconvex airfoil. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Snapshots of the biconvex airfoil simulation at various time stamps. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Mesh for the dam break experiment. We impose reflective wall boundary conditions on all boundaries and take the solution degree as N = 4. We simulate the system up to an end time of t = 5 using an initial time step of ∆t = 1×10−4 with state redistribution. This end ti…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Snapshots of the dam break simulation at various times. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Efficient and Robust Carath\'{e}odory-Steinitz Pruning of Positive Discrete Measures

    math.NA 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    GSCSP prunes positive discrete measures to N-point moment-preserving rules in O(N^2) memory and O(MN^2+N^3) time, with a local total-variation Lipschitz stability theorem.

  2. Entropy stable high-order discontinuous Galerkin spectral-element methods on curvilinear, hybrid meshes

    math.NA 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An entropy-stable DGSEM of arbitrary order is formulated and validated on curvilinear hybrid meshes containing hexahedral, tetrahedral, prismatic, and pyramidal elements.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Chan, Skew-symmetric entropy stable modal discontinuous Galerkin formulations, Journal of Scientific Computing 81 (1) (2019) 459–485

    J. Chan, Skew-symmetric entropy stable modal discontinuous Galerkin formulations, Journal of Scientific Computing 81 (1) (2019) 459–485. doi:10.1007/s10915-019-01026-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s10915-019-01026-w 2019

  2. [2]

    C. M. Dafermos, Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics, A Series of Com- prehensive Studies in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. doi:10.1007/ 978-3-642-04048-1

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Gustafsson, H.-O

    B. Gustafsson, H.-O. Kreiss, J. Oliger, Time dependent problems and difference methods, Vol. 24, John Wiley & Sons, 1995

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    Wintermeyer, A

    N. Wintermeyer, A. R. Winters, G. J. Gassner, D. A. Kopriva, An entropy stable nodal dis- continuous Galerkin method for the two dimensional shallow water equations on unstruc- tured curvilinear meshes with discontinuous bathymetry, Journal of Computational Physics 340 (2017) 200–242. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.03.036. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...

    doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.03.036 2017

  5. [6]

    Chen, C.-W

    T. Chen, C.-W. Shu, Entropy stable high order discontinuous Galerkin methods with suitable quadrature rules for hyperbolic conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics 345 (2017) 427–461. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.05.025

    doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.05.025 2017

  6. [7]

    Godlewski, P.-A

    E. Godlewski, P.-A. Raviart, Numerical approximation of hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, Vol. 118, Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. 28

    work page 2013

  7. [8]

    Hughes, L

    T. Hughes, L. Franca, M. Mallet, A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: I. symmetric forms of the compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations and the second law of thermodynamics, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 54 (2) (1986) 223–234. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(86)90127-1. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/s...

    arXiv 1986

  8. [9]

    Harten, On the symmetric form of systems of conservation laws with entropy, Journal of Computational Physics 49 (1) (1983) 151–164

    A. Harten, On the symmetric form of systems of conservation laws with entropy, Journal of Computational Physics 49 (1) (1983) 151–164. doi:10.1016/0021-9991(83)90118-3

    doi:10.1016/0021-9991(83)90118-3 1983

Show all 71 references
  1. [10]

    Tadmor, The numerical viscosity of entropy stable schemes for systems of conservation laws

    E. Tadmor, The numerical viscosity of entropy stable schemes for systems of conservation laws. I, Mathematics of Computation 49 (179) (1987) 91–103

    1987

  2. [11]

    Tadmor, Entropy stability theory for difference approximations of nonlinear conservation laws and related time-dependent problems, Acta Numerica 12 (2003) 451–512

    E. Tadmor, Entropy stability theory for difference approximations of nonlinear conservation laws and related time-dependent problems, Acta Numerica 12 (2003) 451–512

    2003

  3. [12]

    Tadmor, Chapter 18 - Entropy stable schemes, in: R

    E. Tadmor, Chapter 18 - Entropy stable schemes, in: R. Abgrall, C.-W. Shu (Eds.), Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Vol. 17 of Handbook of Numerical Analysis, Elsevier, 2016, pp. 467–493. doi:10.1016/bs.hna.2016.09.006. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/sc...

    2016 doi

  4. [13]

    D. Ray, P. Chandrashekar, U. S. Fjordholm, S. Mishra, Entropy stable scheme on two- dimensional unstructured grids for Euler equations, Communications in Computational Physics 19 (5) (2016) 1111–1140. doi:10.4208/cicp.scpde14.43s

    2016 doi

  5. [14]

    U. S. Fjordholm, S. Mishra, E. Tadmor, Arbitrarily high-order accurate entropy stable essen- tially nonoscillatory schemes for systems of conservation laws, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 50 (2) (2012) 544–573. doi:10.1137/110836961. URL https://doi.org/10.1137/110836961

    2012 doi

  6. [15]

    P. Chandrashekar, Kinetic energy preserving and entropy stable finite volume schemes for compressible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, Communications in Computational Physics 14 (5) (2013) 1252–1286. doi:10.4208/cicp.170712.010313a

    2013

  7. [16]

    Harten, P

    A. Harten, P. D. Lax, B. v. Leer, On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM Review 25 (1) (1983) 35–61. doi:10.1137/1025002. URL 10.1137/1025002

    1983 doi

  8. [17]

    Tan, C.-W

    S. Tan, C.-W. Shu, Inverse Lax-Wendroff procedure for numerical boundary conditions of conservation laws, Journal of Computational Physics 229 (21) (2010) 8144–8166. doi:10. 1016/j.jcp.2010.07.014. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999110003979

    2010

  9. [18]

    Guermond, B

    J.-L. Guermond, B. Popov, Fast estimation from above of the maximum wave speed in the Riemann problem for the Euler equations, Journal of Computational Physics 321 (2016) 908–

    2016

  10. [19]

    Ainsworth, Dispersive and dissipative behaviour of high order discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods, Journal of Computational Physics 198 (1) (2004) 106–130

    M. Ainsworth, Dispersive and dissipative behaviour of high order discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods, Journal of Computational Physics 198 (1) (2004) 106–130. doi:10.1016/ j.jcp.2004.01.004. 29

    2004

  11. [20]

    Z. Wang, K. Fidkowski, R. Abgrall, F. Bassi, D. Caraeni, A. Cary, H. Deconinck, R. Hartmann, K. Hillewaert, H. Huynh, N. Kroll, G. May, P.-O. Persson, B. van Leer, M. Visbal, High-order CFD methods: current status and perspective, International Journal for Numerical Methods in...

    2013 doi

  12. [21]

    M. R. Visbal, D. V. Gaitonde, High-order-accurate methods for complex unsteady subsonic flows, AIAA Journal 37 (10) (1999) 1231–1239. doi:10.2514/2.591

    1999 doi

  13. [22]

    Tominec, M

    I. Tominec, M. Nazarov, Residual viscosity stabilized RBF-FD methods for solving non- linear conservation laws, Journal of Scientific Computing 94 (1) (2022) 14. doi:10.1007/ s10915-022-02055-8 . URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-022-02055-8

    2022 doi

  14. [23]

    Nazarov, A

    M. Nazarov, A. Larcher, Numerical investigation of a viscous regularization of the Euler equa- tions by entropy viscosity, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 317 (2017) 128–152. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2016.12.010. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article...

    2017 doi

  15. [24]

    Zhang, C.-W

    X. Zhang, C.-W. Shu, On maximum-principle-satisfying high order schemes for scalar conser- vation laws, Journal of Computational Physics 229 (9) (2010) 3091–3120. doi:10.1016/j. jcp.2009.12.030. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999109007165

    2010 doi

  16. [25]

    Zhang, C.-W

    X. Zhang, C.-W. Shu, On positivity-preserving high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes for compressible Euler equations on rectangular meshes, Journal of Computational Physics 229 (23) (2010) 8918–8934. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2010.08.016. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/...

    2010 doi

  17. [26]

    Chan, On discretely entropy conservative and entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin meth- ods, Journal of Computational Physics 362 (2018) 346–374

    J. Chan, On discretely entropy conservative and entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin meth- ods, Journal of Computational Physics 362 (2018) 346–374. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.02. 033

    2018 doi

  18. [27]

    T. C. Fisher, M. H. Carpenter, High-order entropy stable finite difference schemes for nonlinear conservation laws: Finite domains, Journal of Computational Physics 252 (2013) 518–557. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2013.06.014. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199...

    2013 doi

  19. [28]

    M. H. Carpenter, T. C. Fisher, E. J. Nielsen, S. H. Frankel, Entropy stable spectral collocation schemes for the Navier–Stokes equations: Discontinuous interfaces, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 36 (5) (2014) B835–B867. doi:10.1137/130932193. URL https://doi.org/10.1137/...

    2014 doi

  20. [29]

    G. J. Gassner, A. R. Winters, D. A. Kopriva, Split form nodal discontinuous Galerkin schemes with summation-by-parts property for the compressible Euler equations, Journal of Computa- tional Physics 327 (2016) 39–66. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.09.013. URL https://www.sciencedirect...

    2016 doi

  21. [30]

    G. J. Gassner, A. R. Winters, F. J. Hindenlang, D. A. Kopriva, The BR1 scheme is stable for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations, Journal of Scientific Computing 77 (1) (2018) 154–200. doi:10.1007/s10915-018-0702-1 . URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-018-0702-1 30

    2018 doi

  22. [31]

    Crean, J

    J. Crean, J. E. Hicken, D. C. Del Rey Fern´ andez, D. W. Zingg, M. H. Carpenter, Entropy- stable summation-by-parts discretization of the Euler equations on general curved elements, Journal of Computational Physics 356 (2018) 410–438. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.12.015. URL https:/...

    2018 doi

  23. [32]

    W. H. Reed, T. R. Hill, Triangular mesh methods for the neutron transport equation, Tech. Rep. LA-UR-73-479, Los Alamos Scientific Lab., N. Mex.(USA) (1973)

    1973

  24. [33]

    D. C. Del Rey Fern´ andez, P. D. Boom, D. W. Zingg, A generalized framework for nodal first derivative summation-by-parts operators, Journal of Computational Physics 266 (2014) 214–

    2014

  25. [34]

    Chen, C.-W

    T. Chen, C.-W. Shu, Review of entropy stable discontinuous Galerkin methods for systems of conservation laws on unstructured simplex meshes, CSIAM Transactions on Applied Mathe- matics 1 (1) (2020) 1–52

    2020

  26. [35]

    J. Chan, D. C. Del Rey Fern´ andez, M. H. Carpenter, Efficient entropy stable Gauss collocation methods, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 41 (5) (2019) A2938–A2966. doi:10.1137/ 18M1209234. URL https://doi.org/10.1137/18M1209234

    2019 doi

  27. [36]

    Stavrev, L

    A. Stavrev, L. H. Nguyen, R. Shen, V. Varduhn, M. Behr, S. Elgeti, D. Schillinger, Ge- ometrically accurate, efficient, and flexible quadrature techniques for the tetrahedral finite cell method, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 310 (2016) 646–673. doi:10.1...

    2016 doi

  28. [37]

    P. J. Davis, A construction of nonnegative approximate quadratures, Mathematics of Compu- tation 21 (100) (1967) 578–582. doi:10.2307/2005001

    1967 doi

  29. [38]

    Garhuom, A

    W. Garhuom, A. D¨ uster, Non-negative moment fitting quadrature for cut finite elements and cells undergoing large deformations, Computational Mechanics 70 (5) (2022) 1059–1081. doi: 10.1007/s00466-022-02203-9 . URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02203-9

    2022 doi

  30. [39]

    H.-G. Bui, D. Schillinger, G. Meschke, Efficient cut-cell quadrature based on moment fitting for materially nonlinear analysis, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 366 (2020) 113050. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113050. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/art...

    2020

  31. [40]

    Legrain, Non-negative moment fitting quadrature rules for fictitious domain methods, Com- puters & Mathematics with Applications 99 (2021) 270–291

    G. Legrain, Non-negative moment fitting quadrature rules for fictitious domain methods, Com- puters & Mathematics with Applications 99 (2021) 270–291. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2021.07. 019. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898122121002820

    2021 doi

  32. [41]

    Piazzon, A

    F. Piazzon, A. Sommariva, M. Vianello, et al., Caratheodory-Tchakaloff least squares, in: International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA), 2017, pp. 672–676. 31

    2017

  33. [42]

    R. I. Saye, High-order quadrature methods for implicitly defined surfaces and volumes in hyperrectangles, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 37 (2) (2015) A993–A1019. doi: 10.1137/140966290

    2015 doi

  34. [43]

    R. I. Saye, High-order quadrature on multi-component domains implicitly defined by multi- variate polynomials, Journal of Computational Physics 448 (2022) 110720. doi:10.1016/j. jcp.2021.110720

    2022

  35. [44]

    S. Kaur, G. Yan, J. E. Hicken, High-order cut-cell discontinuous Galerkin difference discretiza- tion, AIAA Journal 61 (10) (2023) 4220–4229. doi:10.2514/1.J062990

    2023 doi

  36. [45]

    C. G. Taylor, L. C. Wilcox, J. Chan, An energy stable high-order cut cell discontinuous Galerkin method with state redistribution for wave propagation, Journal of Computational Physics 521 (2025) 113528. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113528. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/...

    2025

  37. [46]

    Kudela, N

    L. Kudela, N. Zander, T. Bog, S. Kollmannsberger, E. Rank, Efficient and accurate numerical quadrature for immersed boundary methods, Advanced modeling and simulation in engineering sciences 2 (2015) 1–22

    2015

  38. [47]

    Burman, S

    E. Burman, S. Claus, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, A. Massing, CutFEM: Discretizing geometry and partial differential equations, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 104 (7) (2015) 472–501. doi:10.1002/nme.4823. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...

    2015 doi

  39. [48]

    Burman, P

    E. Burman, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, CutFEM based on extended finite element spaces, Numerische Mathematik 152 (2) (2022) 331–369

    2022

  40. [49]

    Hern´ andez, M

    J. Hern´ andez, M. Caicedo, A. Ferrer, Dimensional hyper-reduction of nonlinear finite element models via empirical cubature, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 313 (2017) 687–722. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2016.10.022

    2017 doi

  41. [50]

    Slobodkins, J

    A. Slobodkins, J. Tausch, A node elimination algorithm for cubature of high-dimensional polytopes, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 144 (2023) 229–236. doi:10.1016/ j.camwa.2023.06.001. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898122123002468

    2023

  42. [51]

    van den Bos, B

    L. van den Bos, B. Sanderse, W. Bierbooms, G. van Bussel, Generating nested quadrature rules with positive weights based on arbitrary sample sets, SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification 8 (1) (2020) 139–169. doi:10.1137/18M1213373. URL https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10...

    2020 doi

  43. [52]

    M. W. Wilson, A general algorithm for nonnegative quadrature formulas, Mathematics of Computation 23 (106) (1969) 253–258. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1969-0242374-1 . URL https://www.ams.org/mcom/1969-23-106/S0025-5718-1969-0242374-1/

    1969 doi

  44. [53]

    C. Carath´ eodory,¨Uber den variabilit¨ atsbereich der fourier’schen konstanten von positiven har- monischen funktionen, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (1884-1940) 32 (1) (1911) 193–217. doi:10.1007/BF03014795. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03014795 32

    1911 doi

  45. [54]

    Vioreanu, V

    B. Vioreanu, V. Rokhlin, Spectra of multiplication operators as a numerical tool, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 36 (1) (2014) A267–A288. doi:10.1137/110860082. URL https://doi.org/10.1137/110860082

    2014 doi

  46. [55]

    URL https://github.com/cgt3/PathIntersections.jl

    PathIntersections.jl. URL https://github.com/cgt3/PathIntersections.jl

  47. [56]

    URL https://github.com/jlchan/StartUpDG.jl

    StartUpDG.jl. URL https://github.com/jlchan/StartUpDG.jl

  48. [57]

    URL https://github.com/cgt3/ES-CutDG

    Reproducability repository for simulation codes. URL https://github.com/cgt3/ES-CutDG

  49. [58]

    Berger, A

    M. Berger, A. Giuliani, A state redistribution algorithm for finite volume schemes on cut cell meshes, Journal of Computational Physics 428 (2021) 109820. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2020. 109820

    2021 doi

  50. [59]

    Giuliani, A two-dimensional stabilized discontinuous Galerkin method on curvilinear em- bedded boundary grids, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 44 (1) (2022) A389–A415

    A. Giuliani, A two-dimensional stabilized discontinuous Galerkin method on curvilinear em- bedded boundary grids, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 44 (1) (2022) A389–A415. doi:10.1137/21M1396277. URL https://doi.org/10.1137/21M1396277

    2022 doi

  51. [60]

    Giuliani, A

    A. Giuliani, A. Almgren, J. Bell, M. Berger, M. Henry de Frahan, D. Rangarajan, A weighted state redistribution algorithm for embedded boundary grids, Journal of Computational Physics 464 (2022) 111305. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111305

    2022

  52. [61]

    Berger, A

    M. Berger, A. Giuliani, A new provably stable weighted state redistribution algorithm, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 46 (5) (2024) A2848–A2873. doi:10.1137/23M1597484

    2024 doi

  53. [62]

    Sommariva, M

    A. Sommariva, M. Vianello, Computing approximate Fekete points by QR factorizations of Vandermonde matrices, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 57 (8) (2009) 1324–1336. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2008.11.011

    2009 doi

  54. [63]

    Shi, C.-W

    C. Shi, C.-W. Shu, On local conservation of numerical methods for conservation laws, Com- puters & Fluids 169 (2018) 3–9. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.06.018. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004579301730230X

    2018 doi

  55. [64]

    S. F. Davis, Simplified second-order Godunov-type methods, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 9 (3) (1988) 445–473. doi:10.1137/0909030. URL https://doi.org/10.1137/0909030

    1988 doi

  56. [65]

    Ranocha, Comparison of some entropy conservative numerical fluxes for the Euler equations, Journal of Scientific Computing 76 (1) (2018) 216–242

    H. Ranocha, Comparison of some entropy conservative numerical fluxes for the Euler equations, Journal of Scientific Computing 76 (1) (2018) 216–242. doi:10.1007/s10915-017-0618-1 . URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-017-0618-1

    2018 doi

  57. [66]

    Ranocha, Entropy conserving and kinetic energy preserving numerical methods for the Euler equations using summation-by-parts operators, in: S

    H. Ranocha, Entropy conserving and kinetic energy preserving numerical methods for the Euler equations using summation-by-parts operators, in: S. J. Sherwin, D. Moxey, J. Peir´ o, P. E. Vincent, C. Schwab (Eds.), Spectral and High Order Methods for Partial Differential Equatio...

    2018

  58. [67]

    Tsitouras, Runge–Kutta pairs of order 5(4) satisfying only the first column simplifying assumption, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 62 (2) (2011) 770–775

    C. Tsitouras, Runge–Kutta pairs of order 5(4) satisfying only the first column simplifying assumption, Computers & Mathematics with Applications 62 (2) (2011) 770–775. doi:10. 1016/j.camwa.2011.06.002

    2011

  59. [68]

    Rackauckas, Q

    C. Rackauckas, Q. Nie, DifferentialEquations.jl–a performant and feature-rich ecosystem for solving differential equations in Julia, Journal of Open Research Software 5 (1) (2017) 15–15. doi:10.5334/jors.151

    2017 doi

  60. [69]

    Sv¨ ard, H

    M. Sv¨ ard, H. ¨Ozcan, Entropy-stable schemes for the Euler equations with far-field and wall boundary conditions, Journal of Scientific Computing 58 (1) (2014) 61–89. doi:10.1007/ s10915-013-9727-7 . URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10915-013-9727-7

    2014 doi

  61. [70]

    B.-T. Chu, L. S. G. Kov´ asznay, Non-linear interactions in a viscous heat-conducting compress- ible gas, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 3 (5) (1958) 494–514. doi:10.1017/S0022112058000148. 34

    1958 doi

  62. [239]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199911400076X

    doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.01.038. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199911400076X

    2014 doi

  63. [926]

    URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999116301991

    doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.05.054. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999116301991

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.