Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Universal Patterns in the Long-term Growth of Urban Infrastructure in U.S. Cities from 1900 to 2015

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tracking 647 U.S. metropolitan areas over 115 years, this paper finds that per-capita developed land, floor space, and road length grow as cities grow, that smaller cities sprawl fastest, and that nearby cities grow in lockstep.

desk verdict Solid century-scale empirical scaling analysis with two genuinely new patterns, but the superlinear exponents are partly contaminated by the household-size trend and the novelty relative to prior work needs sharper demarcation. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13181 v1 pith:ITUJ6JQE submitted 2024-12-17 physics.soc-ph

Keith Burghardt , Johannes H.Uhl , Kristina Lerman , Stefan Leyk This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.soc-ph
keywords urbanscalingtemporalsprawlU.S.metropolitanareashistoricalsettlementdataroadnetworksspatialcorrelationsustainability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that when individual U.S. metropolitan areas are tracked from 1900 to 2015, their infrastructure does not grow the way cross-sectional city-scaling theory predicts: developed land, indoor floor space, building footprints, and road length typically grow faster than population, so per-capita land and floor space rise as cities grow. It further claims that smaller cities have larger scaling exponents than larger cities, meaning small cities spread out fastest, and that scaling exponents are spatially correlated between cities up to roughly 1,000 km apart, far beyond the short range of population correlations. If these patterns hold, U.S. urban growth is a long-term process of density decline and regional lockstep, with direct consequences for land use, energy demand, and sustainability planning.

What carries the argument

The central object is the temporal scaling exponent $\beta$, obtained by regressing log infrastructure statistic against log population separately for each CBSA over time; $\beta > 1$ means per-capita infrastructure increases with growth, while $\beta < 1$ means it decreases. The population side is reconstructed by allocating each CBSA's census population to urban patches in proportion to the number of houses in each patch, an assumption the authors state explicitly. The infrastructure side comes from integrated geospatial datasets: historical settlement layers, building footprints, and road-network data, with road ages inferred from nearby building ages. The spatial-correlation result is carried by a distance-binned Pearson correlation of scaling exponents between city pairs, compared with the same correlation for populations.

What would settle it

Recompute the temporal scaling exponents using an independent historical population estimate per city decade, such as census-tract counts or dasymetric population surfaces rather than house-count allocation, and compare the slopes: if the exponents move to around one or below for developed area and indoor area, the central claim of long-run density decline would be an artifact of the population proxy, whereas if they stay superlinear the claim survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using historical building, footprint, indoor-area, and road-network reconstructions for 647 U.S. core-based statistical areas with sufficient data, the paper fits a power law $Y \sim P^{\beta}$ for each city's infrastructure statistic $Y$ against its estimated population $P$ decade by decade from 1900 to 2015. The central finding is that temporal scaling exponents $\beta$ are often superlinear ($\beta > 1$) for developed area, indoor area, building footprint area, and road length, which means each new resident is associated with more developed land, more floor space, and more road per person, so cities become less dense and houses larger as they grow. In contrast, road-intersection and edge counts often scale sublinearly, consistent with sprawl. The paper also finds that larger cities have smaller exponents than smaller cities, so large metropolitan areas show a compounding economy of scale, and that exponents for nearby cities remain positively correlated out to about 1,000 km, a distance at which population correlations have already vanished.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that a city's population at each decade is proportional to the number of houses in it, so any systematic drift in people per house (smaller households, vacancies, second homes) would change every scaling exponent and could manufacture the reported superlinear sprawl.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If temporal exponents are typically superlinear, U.S. urban growth since 1900 has meant steadily declining population density, so policies aimed at density must contend with a century-long baseline trend, not just recent zoning.
  • Larger cities' smaller exponents imply a compounding economy of scale: large metros add less new land and floor space per new resident than small ones, so the sustainability burden of sprawl falls disproportionately on small cities.
  • The roughly 1,000 km spatial correlation of exponents implies that growth patterns are regional, so land-use and transportation policy may be more effective when coordinated across neighboring metropolitan areas rather than city by city.
  • Sublinear scaling of intersections and edges per capita means road networks become less interconnected per person as cities grow, a signature of car-oriented, low-density expansion.
  • Regional differences (superlinear in the South and Midwest, sublinear in the Northeast and West) mean a single national growth law does not describe U.S. urbanization; regional context matters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: if the house-count population proxy overstates population growth in older cities, for example because household size fell or vacancy rose, the reported superlinear exponents for developed area and indoor area would be too high; re-estimating with vacancy- or household-size-corrected populations is a direct robustness test.
  • Editorial extension: the spatial correlation length of about 1,000 km suggests that state-level planning regimes, climate zones, or topography could be a shared cause; comparing exponents before and after major federal highway or housing programs would test whether policy regimes shift the correlation.
  • Editorial extension: applying the same temporal-scaling pipeline to countries with different sprawl histories, such as European or Japanese metropolitan areas, would help separate U.S.-specific car-oriented growth from a universal urban-growth mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper uses HISDAC-US building records, Microsoft building footprints, and road network data to estimate temporal urban scaling exponents (developed area, indoor area, building footprint area, road length, and road network statistics versus population) for 647 U.S. CBSAs from 1900 to 2015. The authors report three patterns: scaling exponents are often superlinear, implying decreasing density and increasing indoor area per capita as cities grow; larger cities have smaller exponents than smaller cities; and exponents are spatially correlated over distances up to roughly 1000 km, beyond the range of population correlations. Robustness to data-completeness thresholds and time-period splits is reported in the Supplementary Information, and code and data are made available anonymously.

Significance. If the results hold, this would be a valuable long-term, large-sample characterization of temporal urban scaling, extending prior cross-sectional work and providing a new spatial-correlation result that could inform theories of urban growth and sustainability. The paper's strengths include the breadth of the data (over a century, nearly all U.S. metropolitan areas), explicit robustness checks in the SI (S4–S17), high R² values for the power-law fits (SI S18–S19), and the availability of code and data. The central caveat is that population is not measured directly but inferred from building counts, so the temporal scaling exponents may be substantially biased by demographic changes such as declining household size. Because this concern affects the headline superlinearity and the interpretation in terms of per-capita infrastructure growth, the paper in its current form does not yet establish its central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5 (Population estimation) and Section 2.1] The population denominator is constructed as P_patch(t) = H_patch(t) × [N_census(t)/H_total(t)], where H is the number of houses and N_census is the CBSA census population. Since developed area, indoor area, and building footprint area are derived from the same building-stock data that determines H_patch, the numerator and denominator of the scaling regressions are not independent. Mean U.S. household size declined from roughly 4.6 to 2.5 persons over 1900–2015. If H_patch grows at rate a and the persons-per-house ratio declines at rate b, then a per-house-constant numerator growing at rate a will appear to scale with population with exponent approximately a/(a−b), which exceeds 1 even when per-house infrastructure is constant. The manuscript does not provide any temporal validation of the house-to-population ratio; the dasymetric agreement cited in Section 5 is cross-sectional and does not test the time-varying ratio. Please add an analysis that replaces the building-derived population with a measure not proportional to building counts, or that explicitly corrects for household-size and vacancy trends, and report how the exponents in Figures 2–5 change.
  2. [Section 2.1 and Abstract] The statement that "houses are getting larger" and that "indoor area per capita increases" is a direct interpretation of the same non-independent quantities. Because indoor area is roughly per-house indoor area times the number of houses, and population is roughly the number of houses times persons-per-house, the ratio indoor area/population equals (per-house indoor area)/(persons per house). The observed superlinear scaling could therefore be explained entirely by declining household size rather than by larger houses or sprawl. The paper should report per-housing-unit metrics (e.g., indoor area per house or per dwelling) and show whether the superlinear exponents and the size dependence in Figure 5 persist when the population proxy is changed or when household size is controlled for.
  3. [Section 2.2, Figure 5, and Figure 6] The "larger cities have smaller exponents" pattern and the long-range spatial correlations of exponents could also arise, at least in part, from city-size-dependent or region-dependent trends in household size and vacancy, which propagate directly into the constructed population denominator. The SI robustness checks vary data-completeness thresholds and time periods (S4–S13), but they never vary the population construction itself. I request an additional robustness analysis using CBSA-level census population (rather than patch-level allocation) and/or including household-size and vacancy covariates, to test whether the size dependence and the spatial correlation of exponents survive.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Main text (Methods) vs. SI Figure S12 caption] The Methods section states that Pearson correlations are computed for the distance-binned exponent correlations, while the caption of SI Figure S12 refers to Spearman correlations; please reconcile this inconsistency.
  2. [Section 2.1, Figure 2 caption] The caption says red lines are 10 random MSAs and blue dashed lines are 10 random µSAs, but the legend and the main text do not clarify whether the same random cities are used across panels; please state whether the sample is fixed or resampled per panel.
  3. [Section 2.1, text] The phrase "Dunns' posthoc test" should be "Dunn's post hoc test" for consistency with the reference.
  4. [Section 3.2, Limitations] The limitation paragraph acknowledges that population is assumed proportional to the number of buildings, but it does not mention the specific risk that a time-varying persons-per-household ratio will bias temporal scaling exponents; adding this explicit caveat would help readers interpret the reported exponents.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: temporal scaling exponents are measured against census population; the house-based population allocation is an acknowledged modeling assumption, not a definitional reduction.

full rationale

The paper does not claim a derivation or prediction; it measures temporal scaling exponents beta in Y ~ P^beta for each CBSA. At the CBSA level, the population denominator is, after aggregation across patches, essentially the census population: Section 5 states that patch population is estimated as 'the fraction of total houses existing within a particular CBSA multiplied by the CBSA’s US census population', so summing patches gives P_CBSA(t) = [H_urban(t)/H_CBSA(t)] * N_census(t). The dominant temporal signal in the denominator is therefore the measured census population, not a fitted parameter. The house-count proportionality is explicitly acknowledged as an assumption in Section 3.2 ('we assume that ... population is proportional to the number of buildings within a given patch'). It is a real threat to validity if the urban share of houses or persons-per-house changes systematically, and the paper notes that more research is needed, but this is not a definitional equivalence that forces beta > 1 by construction. The interpretation 'houses are getting larger' is an inference from per-capita indoor area growth, and the paper also points to external census evidence on average new house sizes in the supplementary material of ref. 20. The self-citations (refs. 19 and 20) provide data, method, and a previously established cross-sectional house–population correlation with dasymetric validation; they function as data provenance and calibration rather than as a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that defines the result. Robustness checks under different completeness filters and alternative growth definitions (SI Figs. S4–S20) further show that the empirical content does not reduce to any single self-cited step. Therefore no circular step of the enumerated kinds is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central empirical quantity, the temporal scaling exponent, rests on two modeling choices: the spatial allocation of population via building counts and the imputation of road ages from buildings. Neither is invented ad hoc; both are inherited from prior work (refs 19 and 20), but they couple the numerator and denominator of the scaling relation. No new theoretical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • house-to-population proportionality = linear slope 1 (implicit)
    Population inside each patch is allocated in proportion to the number of houses in that patch times the CBSA census population. The proportionality is validated in prior work (ref 20) but is an assumed relationship that directly sets the denominator of every scaling exponent. Section 5.
  • data completeness thresholds = temporal completeness > 60%, spatial coverage > 40% (robustness at 0% and 80%)
    Inclusion thresholds for CBSAs are chosen by hand; results are shown to be robust across thresholds, but the choice affects the main sample of 647 CBSAs. Section 5.
  • distance binning for spatial correlations = not specified in main text
    The correlation-vs-distance curve depends on the choice of distance bins and minimum pair counts; the paper does not state bin widths. Section 2.2 and Section 5.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption CBSA boundaries as of 2010 are a valid frame for measuring city growth over 1900-2015; patch merging and boundary changes do not affect scaling exponents because the largest patches dominate.
    Section 2.1 and SI Figure S1 justify that the largest one or two patches dominate statistics; alternative boundary definitions are noted as less consistent.
  • domain assumption Road construction years can be imputed from the ages of nearby buildings.
    Section 3.2 (Limitations): 'we assume that roads are constructed at approximately the same time as nearby buildings'; the paper cites prior work for robustness.
  • standard math Each statistic follows a power law Y ~ P^beta over time, so log-log linear regression is the appropriate fit.
    Section 5: fits are to log-scaled data; SI Figures S18-S19 report high R2 supporting the power-law assumption.
  • domain assumption The census population and the building-derived population proxy are interchangeable for per-capita statements.
    The paper uses the building proxy to allocate population and treats scaling exponents as 'per capita' throughout Section 2.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal Patterns in the Long-term Growth of Urban Infrastructure in U.S. Cities from 1900 to 2015." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ITUJ6JQE

@misc{pith2026241213181,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal Patterns in the Long-term Growth of Urban Infrastructure in U.S. Cities from 1900 to 2015},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ITUJ6JQE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13181}
}
read the original abstract

Despite the rapid growth of cities in the past century, our quantitative, in-depth understanding of how cities grow remains limited due to a consistent lack of historical data. Thus, the scaling laws between a city's features and its population as they evolve over time, known as temporal city scaling, is under-explored, especially for time periods spanning multiple decades. In this paper, we leverage novel data sources such as the Historical Settlement Data Compilation for the U.S. (HISDAC-US), and analyze the temporal scaling laws of developed area, building indoor area, building footprint area, and road length and other road network statistics for nearly all metropolitan areas in the U.S. from 1900 to 2015. We find that scaling exponents vary dramatically between cities as a function of their size and location. Three notable patterns emerge. First, scaling law exponents imply many, but not all, metropolitan areas are becoming less dense and indoor area per capita increases as cities grow, in contrast to expectations. Second, larger cities tend to have a smaller scaling exponent than smaller cities. Third, scaling exponents (and growth patterns) are similar between nearby cities. These results show a long-term trend that could harm urban sustainability as previously dense populations are rapidly spreading out into undeveloped land. Moreover, the regional similarity of long-term urban growth patterns implies that city evolution and sustainability patterns are more interconnected than prior research has suggested. These results help urban planners and scientists understand universal, long-term patterns of city growth across the US.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.13181 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Data collected to analyze temporal scaling. (a) The growth of building indoor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Temporal scaling for a random sample of cities. (a) Developed area, (b) indoor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Scaling laws across the US. Map of temporal scaling law exponents for (a) devel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Scaling law exponents split by city size and region. Distribution of scaling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Scaling law exponent versus 2015 population. (a) Developed area, (b) indoor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Correlations of scaling exponents versus distance between nearby cities. This [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CHRONEX-US: City-level historical road network expansion dataset for the conterminous United States

    physics.soc-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CHRONEX-US is a public vector dataset with model-based construction-year estimates for road segments in 693 U.S. metropolitan and micropolitan areas from 1900 to 2020.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , author Leyk, S

    author Ahn, Y. , author Leyk, S. , author Uhl, J.H. , author McShane, C.M. , year 2024 . title An integrated multi-source dataset for measuring settlement evolution in the united states from 1810 to 2020 . journal Scientific Data volume 11 , pages 275 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03081-x, :10.1038/s41597-024-03081-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03081-x 2024

  2. [2]

    , author Parent, J

    author Angel, S. , author Parent, J. , author Civco, D.L. , author Blei, A. , year 2017 . title The persistent decline in urban densities: Global and historical evidence of 'sprawl'

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    , author Parent, J

    author Angel, S. , author Parent, J. , author Civco, D.L. , author Blei, A. , author Potere, D. , year 2011 . title The dimensions of global urban expansion: Estimates and projections for all countries, 2000–2050 . journal Progress in Planning volume 75 , pages 53--107 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305900611000109, :https://doi.org...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.progress.2011.04.001 2011

  4. [4]

    , author Millard-Ball, A

    author Barrington-Leigh, C. , author Millard-Ball, A. , year 2015 . title A century of sprawl in the united states . journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences volume 112 , pages 8244--8249

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    , author Millard-Ball, A

    author Barrington-Leigh, C. , author Millard-Ball, A. , year 2020 . title Global trends toward urban street-network sprawl . journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences volume 117 , pages 1941--1950

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    , year 2006

    author Batty, M. , year 2006 . title Rank clocks . journal Nature volume 444 , pages 592--596 . https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05302, :10.1038/nature05302

    work page doi:10.1038/nature05302 2006

  7. [7]

    , year 2013

    author Bettencourt, L.M.A. , year 2013 . title The origins of scaling in cities . journal Science volume 340 , pages 1438--1441 . https://science.sciencemag.org/content/340/6139/1438, :10.1126/science.1235823, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://science.sciencemag.org/content/340/6139/1438.full.pdf arXiv:https://science.sciencemag.org/content/340/6139/1438.full.pdf

    doi:10.1126/science.1235823 2013

  8. [8]

    , author Lobo, J

    author Bettencourt, L.M.A. , author Lobo, J. , author Helbing, D. , author K \"u hnert, C. , author West, G.B. , year 2007 . title Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities . journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences volume 104 , pages 7301--7306 . https://www.pnas.org/content/104/17/7301, :10.1073/pnas.0610172104, http://a...

    doi:10.1073/pnas.0610172104 2007

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    , author Yang, V.C

    author Bettencourt, L.M.A. , author Yang, V.C. , author Lobo, J. , author Kempes, C.P. , author Rybski, D. , author Hamilton, M.J. , year 2020 . title The interpretation of urban scaling analysis in time . journal Journal of The Royal Society Interface volume 17 , pages 201908...

    2020

  2. [10]

    , year 2019

    author Boeing, G. , year 2019 . title Urban spatial order: street network orientation, configuration, and entropy . journal Applied Network Science volume 4 , pages 67 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-019-0189-1, :10.1007/s41109-019-0189-1

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    , year 2020 a

    author Boeing, G. , year 2020 a. title A multi-scale analysis of 27,000 urban street networks: Every us city, town, urbanized area, and zillow neighborhood . journal Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science volume 47 , pages 590--608 . :10.1177/2399808318784595

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    , year 2020 b

    author Boeing, G. , year 2020 b. title Off the grid...and back again? the recent evolution of american street network planning and design . journal Journal of the American Planning Association volume 87 , pages 1--15

    2020

  5. [13]

    , year 2018

    author Bureau, C. , year 2018 . title cb\_2018\_us\_region\_500k . https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/GENZ2018/shp/cb\_2018\_us\_region\_500k.zip

    2018

  6. [14]

    , year 2020 a

    author Bureau, U.C. , year 2020 a. title cenpop2000

    2020

  7. [15]

    , year 2020 b

    author Bureau, U.C. , year 2020 b. title Census u.s. decennial county population data, 1900-1990

    2020

  8. [16]

    , year 2020 c

    author Bureau, U.C. , year 2020 c. title County population totals: 2010-2019

    2020

  9. [17]

    , year 2023

    author Bureau, U.C. , year 2023 . title About . howpublished https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/metro-micro/about.html

    2023

  10. [18]

    , author Uhl, J.H

    author Burghardt, K. , author Uhl, J.H. , year 2022 . title Historical road network statistics for core-based statistical areas in the u.s. (1900 - 2010) . :10.6084/m9.figshare.19584088.v1. note online; accessed 01 January 2023

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    , author Uhl, J.H

    author Burghardt, K. , author Uhl, J.H. , author Lerman, K. , author Leyk, S. , year 2022 . title Road network evolution in the urban and rural united states since 1900 . journal Computers, Environment and Urban Systems volume 95 , pages 101803 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/...

    2022

  12. [20]

    , author Uhl, J.H

    author Burghardt, K. , author Uhl, J.H. , author Lerman, K. , author Leyk, S. , year 2023 . title Analyzing urban scaling laws in the united states over 115 years . http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.10852 arXiv:2209.10852

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    , author Barthelemy, M

    author Depersin, J. , author Barthelemy, M. , year 2018 . title From global scaling to the dynamics of individual cities . journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences volume 115 , pages 2317--2322 . https://www.pnas.org/content/115/10/2317, :10.1073/pnas.1718690115...

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    , year 2001

    author Deutsch, C.V. , year 2001 . title Geostatistics . publisher Academic Press

    2001

  15. [23]

    , author Simmons, K.M

    author Done, J.M. , author Simmons, K.M. , author Czajkowski, J. , year 2018 . title Relationship between residential losses and hurricane winds: Role of the florida building code . journal ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Enginee...

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    , year 1961

    author Dunn, O.J. , year 1961 . title Multiple comparisons among means . journal Journal of the American Statistical Association volume 56 , pages 52--64

    1961

  17. [25]

    , year 2004

    author Eeckhout, J. , year 2004 . title Gibrat's law for (all) cities . journal American Economic Review volume 94 , pages 1429--1451 . https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/0002828043052303, :10.1257/0002828043052303

    2004 doi

  18. [26]

    , author Suchecki, K

    author Fern\'andez-Gracia, J. , author Suchecki, K. , author Ramasco, J.J. , author San Miguel, M. , author Egu\' luz, V.M. , year 2014 . title Is the voter model a model for voters? journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 112 , pages 158701 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevL...

    2014 doi

  19. [27]

    , author Ioannides, Y.M

    author Gabaix, X. , author Ioannides, Y.M. , year 2004 . title Chapter 53 - the evolution of city size distributions , in: editor Henderson, J.V. , editor Thisse, J.F. (Eds.), booktitle Cities and Geography . publisher Elsevier . volume volume 4 of series Handbook of Regional ...

    2004 doi

  20. [28]

    , author Johnston, R

    author Gregory, D. , author Johnston, R. , author Pratt, G. , author Watts, M. , author Whatmore, S. , year 2011 . title The dictionary of human geography . publisher John Wiley & Sons

    2011

  21. [29]

    , year 2008

    author Helmer, G. , year 2008 . title Micropolitan statistical areas: a few highlights . howpublished https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2008/article/micropolitan-statistical-areas-a-few-highlights.htm

    2008

  22. [30]

    , author Lin, H

    author Hu, S. , author Lin, H. , author Xie, K. , author Dai, J. , author Qui, J. , year 2018 . title Impacts of rain and waterlogging on traffic speed and volume on urban roads , in: booktitle 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) , p...

    2018

  23. [31]

    , author Jia, T

    author Jiang, B. , author Jia, T. , year 2011 . title Zipf's law for all the natural cities in the united states: a geospatial perspective . journal International Journal of Geographical Information Science volume 25 , pages 1269--1281 . :10.1080/13658816.2010.510801

    2011

  24. [32]

    , year 2019

    author Keuschnigg, M. , year 2019 . title Scaling trajectories of cities . journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences volume 116 , pages 13759--13761 . https://www.pnas.org/content/116/28/13759, :10.1073/pnas.1906258116, http://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.pnas.org/c...

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    , author Wallis, W.A

    author Kruskal, W.H. , author Wallis, W.A. , year 1952 . title Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis . journal Journal of the American Statistical Association volume 47 , pages 583--621

    1952

  26. [34]

    , author Li, Z

    author Lan, T. , author Li, Z. , author Zhang, H. , year 2019 . title Urban allometric scaling beneath structural fractality of road networks . journal Annals of the American Association of Geographers volume 109 , pages 943--957

    2019

  27. [35]

    , author Caruso, G

    author Lemoy, R. , author Caruso, G. , year 2021 . title Radial analysis and scaling of urban land use . journal Scientific Reports volume 11 , pages 22044 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01477-y, :10.1038/s41598-021-01477-y

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    , author Uhl, J.H

    author Leyk, S. , author Uhl, J.H. , year 2018 a. title Hisdac-us, historical settlement data compilation for the conterminous united states over 200 years . journal Scientific data volume 5 , pages 180175

    2018

  29. [37]

    , author Uhl, J.H

    author Leyk, S. , author Uhl, J.H. , year 2018 b. title Historical built-up intensity layer series for the U.S. 1810 - 2015 . :10.7910/DVN/1WB9E4

    2018 doi

  30. [38]

    , author Bettencourt, L.M

    author Lobo, J. , author Bettencourt, L.M. , author Smith, M.E. , author Ortman, S. , year 2020 . title Settlement scaling theory: Bridging the study of ancient and contemporary urban systems . journal Urban Studies volume 57 , pages 731--747 . :10.1177/0042098019873796

    2020 doi

  31. [39]

    , author Barthelemy, M

    author Louf, R. , author Barthelemy, M. , year 2014 . title How congestion shapes cities: from mobility patterns to scaling . journal Scientific Reports volume 4 , pages 5561 . https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05561, :10.1038/srep05561

    2014 doi

  32. [40]

    title Usbuildingfootprints

    author Microsoft , year 2020 . title Usbuildingfootprints . https://github.com/Microsoft/USBuildingFootprints

    2020

  33. [41]

    , author Rybski, D

    author Ribeiro, F.L. , author Rybski, D. , year 2023 . title Mathematical models to explain the origin of urban scaling laws . journal Physics Reports volume 1012 , pages 1--39 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157323000650, :https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ph...

    2023 doi

  34. [42]

    , author Rybski, D

    author Rozenfeld, H.D. , author Rybski, D. , author Andrade, J.S. , author Batty, M. , author Stanley, H.E. , author Makse, H.A. , year 2008 . title Laws of population growth . journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences volume 105 , pages 18702--18707 . https://ww...

    2008 doi

  35. [43]

    , author Rybski, D

    author Rozenfeld, H.D. , author Rybski, D. , author Gabaix, X. , author Makse, H.A. , year 2011 . title The area and population of cities: New insights from a different perspective on cities . journal American Economic Review volume 101 , pages 2205–2225

    2011

  36. [44]

    , author Moses, M.E

    author Samaniego, H. , author Moses, M.E. , year 2008 . title Cities as organisms: Allometric scaling of urban road networks . journal Journal of Transport and Land Use volume 1 . https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/29, :10.5198/jtlu.v1i1.29

    2008 doi

  37. [45]

    , author Giometto, A

    author Strano, E. , author Giometto, A. , author Shai, S. , author Bertuzzo, E. , author Mucha, P.J. , author Rinaldo, A. , year 2017 . title The scaling structure of the global road network . journal Royal Society Open Science volume 4 , pages 170590 . :10.1098/rsos.170590

    2017 doi

  38. [46]

    , author Burghardt, K

    author Uhl, J.H. , author Burghardt, K. , year 2022 . title Historical, generalized built-up areas in u.s. core-based statistical areas 1900 - 2015 . howpublished https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19593409.v2

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    , author Leyk, S

    author Uhl, J.H. , author Leyk, S. , year 2020 a. title Historical built-up areas (BUA) - gridded surfaces for the U.S. from 1810 to 2015 . :10.7910/DVN/J6CYUJ

    2020 doi

  40. [48]

    , author Leyk, S

    author Uhl, J.H. , author Leyk, S. , year 2020 b. title Historical built-up property locations (BUPL) - gridded surfaces for the U.S. from 1810 to 2015 . :10.7910/DVN/SJ213V

    2020 doi

  41. [49]

    , author Leyk, S

    author Uhl, J.H. , author Leyk, S. , year 2020 c. title Historical built-up property records (bupr) - gridded surfaces for the u.s. from 1810 to 2015 . :10.7910/DVN/YSWMDR

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    , author Leyk, S

    author Uhl, J.H. , author Leyk, S. , year 2022 . title Historical building footprint area (BUFA) - gridded surfaces for the conterminous U.S. from 1900 to 2010 . :10.7910/DVN/HXQWNJ

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    Geological Survey, N.G.T.O.C

    author U.S. Geological Survey, N.G.T.O.C. , year 2018 . title Usgs national transportation dataset (ntd) . https://thor-f5.er.usgs.gov/ngtoc/metadata/waf/transportation/ntd/

    2018

  44. [52]

    , year 1949

    author Zipf, G.K. , year 1949 . title Human behavior and the principle of least effort . publisher Addison-Wesley Press

    1949

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.