Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 76 references

X-ray pulsed light curves of highly compact neutron stars as probes of scalar-tensor theories of gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that near the critical general-relativistic compactness $M/R = 0.284$, a single hot spot's X-ray pulse becomes a sensitive probe of scalar-tensor gravity because the critical deflection angle shifts with the scalar charge…

desk verdict First finite-spot STT pulse profiles at critical compactness; the 80% flux claim is a plausible but unverified secondary-image effect that deserves a hard look. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.13867 v1 pith:IGJVIRUC submitted 2024-12-18 astro-ph.HE

Tulio Ottoni , Jaziel G. Coelho , Rafael C. R. de Lima , Jonas P. Pereira , Jorge A. Rueda This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords neutronstarsscalar-tensorgravityX-raypulseprofileslightbendinghotspotsspontaneousscalarizationJustmetriccompactness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that X-ray pulse profiles of neutron stars near the maximum-compactness regime—about $GM/(Rc^2) = 0.284$, where general relativity predicts the whole stellar surface becomes visible—are unusually sensitive to scalar-tensor gravity. Computing the flux of a single finite hot spot in the exact scalar-tensor exterior spacetime (the Just metric), with light bending, Shapiro time delay, and Doppler effects included, the authors find that a scalar charge $Q=0.5$ with a surface conformal factor $A_s=1.05$ can make the bolometric flux differ by up to 80% from the GR prediction when the spot crosses the far side of the star. The physical reason is that the critical deflection angle $\psi_c$, which decides whether an invisible shadow zone or a second lensed image forms behind the star, shifts nonlinearly with compactness in scalar-tensor theory. If this is right, accurate X-ray pulse shapes of massive pulsars could constrain the scalar charge and scalar-tensor parameters, and radius inferences from light curves could be biased by up to about 10% if scalarization is ignored. The paper also argues that current X-ray radius uncertainties are too large to distinguish the theories, but next-generation X-ray and gravitational-wave measurements could close the gap.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Einstein-frame Just metric, the exact spherical exterior solution of scalar-tensor gravity, parametrized by the ADM mass $b=2M$, a length scale $a$, and the scalar charge $q$, with $a/b = \sqrt{1+Q^2}$; the surface conformal factor $A_s$ converts the Jordan-frame stellar radius used by observers into the Einstein-frame radial coordinate $\rho_s$ used in ray tracing. Photon paths are null geodesics of this metric, and the key derived object is the integral for the cumulative deflection angle $\psi(\alpha; \bar a_s, Q)$ (Eq. 26) together with its value at tangential emission, the critical angle $\psi_c = \psi(\pi/2)$. The flux is obtained by integrating the scalar-tensor differential flux formula over a finite circular spot, with the integration switching to the secondary image at $\cos(\psi_0+\Delta\psi) \le \cos\psi_c$. The critical angle is the switch that turns a small STT-GR difference in geometry into a large difference in observable flux, which is why the paper identifies high compactness as the regime where pulse profiles can probe scalarization.

What would settle it

One concrete check is to recompute the STT pulse profile with a realistic atmospheric radiative-transfer model and an oblate rotating star: if the secondary-image contribution at half rotation phase drops below about 10% of the direct flux, the claimed 80% contrast cannot appear in real data. Observationally, a high-precision phase-resolved observation of a high-mass pulsar with an independently measured mass and radius that is fit well by a GR model at or above $M/R = 0.284$ without any extra brightening would rule out the paper's fiducial scalar charge.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the pulse profile of a highly compact neutron star is a sharp scalar-charge detector because the photon deflection integral (Eq. 26) makes the critical view angle $\psi_c$ depend nonlinearly on both compactness and the scalar charge $Q$, through the ratio $a/b = \sqrt{1+Q^2}$ of the Just exterior metric. At the GR threshold $M/R = 0.284$ the tangent ray bends through exactly $\pi$, so the whole surface is visible; in scalar-tensor theory the same compactness can give $\psi_c < \pi$, leaving an invisible zone that eclipses the spot, or $\psi_c > \pi$, creating a second, lensed image whose flux adds a brightening near half the rotation period. For the paper's representative models ($Q=0.5$ and $A_s = 0.95$ or 1.05, same mass and Jordan-frame radius as a $2.1\,M_\odot$ GR star), that secondary-image brightening produces bolometric flux differences up to 80% relative to GR, and the relative change grows nonlinearly as compactness approaches the critical value while staying below roughly 5% for compactness well below it. The paper presents these results as an upper-limit estimate for massless scalar-tensor theory, with massive scalar fields suppressing the effect.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation rests on treating the spinning, mass-loaded star as a spherical, non-rotating Just spacetime with a fixed scalar charge and isotropic surface emission; if a real atmosphere suppresses the tangentially emitted rays that form the second image, or if rotation deforms the star's exterior, the predicted brightening could shrink or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a neutron star near $M/R = 0.284$ with an edge-on spot crossing the far side, the STT light curve can show either a full eclipse or a lensed brightening where GR shows a smooth non-zero flux, so a single pulse shape plus an independent mass can separate the two theories.
  • Because the critical compactness shifts by up to about 10% between GR and STT for the models considered, fitting STT light curves changes the inferred radius by a similar amount, so ignoring scalarization is a systematic bias in radius measurements.
  • Even in geometries where the spot never crosses the special region behind the star, including rotation at 700 Hz still produces STT-GR differences from time delay and redshift integrated over a finite spot, so the test is not limited to the edge-on configuration.
  • Below the critical-compactness regime, STT-GR flux differences stay under about 5%, concentrating the probe in the high-mass, high-compactness pulsars.
  • Smaller hot spots give more pronounced secondary-image brightening peaks, so future searches should target sources with small, near-equatorial spots.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the paper assumes isotropic bolometric surface emission, but real neutron-star atmospheres tend to suppress tangentially emitted photons, so the 80% contrast is likely an upper bound and the practical sensitivity depends on how much of the secondary-image flux survives.
  • Editorial extension: applying the same ray-tracing pipeline to two-spot or multipolar spot geometries, as many millisecond pulsars require, could either amplify or wash out the secondary-image signature; this is a concrete modelling step the paper leaves undone.
  • Editorial extension: the paper works at fixed $Q=0.5$; a natural follow-up is a Bayesian fit of GR and STT templates to one high-mass pulsar with an independent radius prior, which would convert the claimed sensitivity into posterior bounds on the scalar charge.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. Ottoni et al. model X-ray pulsed light curves from a single finite hot spot on a neutron star in massless scalar-tensor theory, using the analytic Just exterior metric and the Silva-Yunes differential flux formula. They focus on compactness near the GR critical value M/R=0.284, where the whole stellar surface becomes visible and multiple images of the spot can appear. For doppelgänger models with the same mass and radius but scalar charge Q=0.5 and surface conformal factor As=0.95 or 1.05, they report bolometric flux differences relative to GR of up to 80%, driven by a secondary-image brightening when the spot crosses the lensed region behind the star, and a nonlinear shift of the critical view angle with compactness. They also estimate that STT can change the inferred neutron-star radius by up to about 10% and argue that improved radius measurements from NICER and future missions could eventually constrain scalar charges.

Significance. The paper identifies a promising qualitative effect: near the critical compactness, the pulse profile becomes sensitive to the scalar charge through the appearance and brightness of a secondary image. Its strengths are the use of an exact analytic exterior solution, the recovery of the GR limit, the agreement with Hu et al. below the critical compactness within 5% (Fig. B7), and a clear statement of the model's limitations. The nonlinear dependence of the critical view angle on compactness in Fig. 1 is also interesting. However, the quantitative 80% claim rests on a two-image construction whose validity for the Just metric is asserted rather than demonstrated, and on parameter combinations whose physical realizability is not established. The paper is therefore a useful exploratory study, but the headline effect is not yet anchored to a consistently derived observable.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eq. (29) and the turn-on condition after Eq. (31)] The secondary-image prescription is asserted rather than derived for the Just metric. The paper places the secondary image center at ψ_sec = 2π − ψ_0, activates it when cos(ψ_0 + Δψ) ≤ cos(ψ_c), and applies the same integrand dα/dψ to it. This is the established Schwarzschild treatment in Refs. [17,23,62], but for the Just metric with scalar charge the equivalence of this prescription with the true lensed secondary image, including the correct Jacobian on the secondary branch, is not shown. Since the up-to-80% brightening in Figs. 4 and B9 is produced entirely by this secondary-image contribution near ψ_c, an error in the turn-on location or in the branch of dα/dψ would directly set the headline number. I request either a validation by backward ray tracing in the Just metric for representative parameters, or an analytic derivation of the secondary-branch Jacobian, or an explicit statement that the two-image construction is an assumption that has not been verified against direct photon geodesic counts.
  2. [§3, Table 1] The doppelgänger models treat Q and As as independent inputs for fixed M and R. In a consistent STT, Q and As are not free parameters; they are fixed by the interior stellar solution and the coupling function. The paper does not show that (Q=0.5, As=0.95) or (Q=0.5, As=1.05) with M=2.1 M⊙ and R=10.918 km corresponds to any scalarized stellar model. Figure 2 demonstrates that high-compactness branches exist for the ENG and MPA1 equations of state with ξ=−3 and 25, but it does not report the values of Q and As along those branches at M/R=0.284. Without such a consistency check, the 80% flux difference is an upper envelope over a parameter space that may be unphysical. I recommend computing Q and As self-consistently for representative couplings and re-evaluating the lightcurve comparison with those values, or at least restricting the lightcurve survey to parameter combinations that are known to occur on a solution sequence.
  3. [§4, Figs. 4 and B9; §5] The 80% maximum difference is produced by the secondary-image brightening, which is dominated by near-tangential emission (α ≈ π/2). The paper correctly notes in the conclusion that atmospheric effects can attenuate tangentially emitted photons, but because this is the mechanism of the headline effect, the observational claim should be presented as an upper limit under isotropic, atmosphere-free emission. A simple sensitivity test with a limb-darkening or absorption model would show how much of the 80% survives. Without it, the title-level claim that X-ray pulse profiles can 'probe' STT remains unquantified, even though the paper is upfront about the need for atmospheres in future work.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§3, Eq. (29)] Please specify the integration domain over the spot in terms of ψ and φ, and define the spot's local azimuthal coordinate; as written, dψ dφ leaves the orientation of the spot relative to the rotation axis ambiguous for a finite circular spot.
  2. [Table 1] Define ¯a_s and ¯b_s in the caption (as a/ρ_s and b/ρ_s) and state explicitly that ρ_s is obtained by inverting Eq. (15) with the Jordan-frame radius R; otherwise the reader cannot verify the entries.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] State clearly that the left boundary of the shaded band corresponds to A_s=1.05 and the right boundary to A_s=0.95; the current wording is easy to misread.
  4. [§4, second paragraph] The phrase 'half the rational phase' should read 'half the rotational phase'.
  5. [Appendix A] Clarify that the effective compactness values 0.234 and 0.258 are fitted to make the approximate curve follow the numerical one, and that the reported 7% error applies at α = π/2.
  6. [General numerical methods] The paper does not report a numerical convergence test for the spot integration, which is relevant near the critical angle where dα/dψ diverges; please add a brief convergence statement, including the number of grid points in ψ and φ.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: predictions follow from published Just-metric and Silva-Yunes flux inputs, not from fitted data.

full rationale

The central claim—STT light curves can differ from GR by up to 80% near M/R = 0.284—is computed from an explicit model: the exact Just exterior spacetime (Eq. 14), the Silva-Yunes STT differential flux formula (Eq. 28), and a finite-spot integration (Eq. 29). The STT parameters Q = 0.5 and A_s = 0.95/1.05 are stated inputs, not parameters fitted to pulse-profile data, so the flux differences are model predictions rather than fitted outputs renamed as predictions. The secondary-image prescription (center at psi_sec = 2*pi - psi_0 and turn-on condition cos(psi_0 + Delta_psi) <= cos(psi_c)) is an assumption of the ray-tracing model; even if its geometric validity at near-critical compactness is debatable, it is not a circular reduction because it is not derived from the quantity being predicted. The paper also validates against an external benchmark below the critical compactness, reporting agreement with Hu et al. within 5% (Appendix B), which supports the independent content of the calculation. The only self-citations are to the numerical integration procedure of de Lima et al. [62, 65], and these are not load-bearing for the STT-versus-GR comparison. The paper's own caveats about atmospheric effects, oblateness, and rotation affect realism and correctness risk, not circularity. Therefore, no load-bearing step reduces, by definition or by self-citation, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model has no invented fields or particles; the scalar field is standard STT. The central quantitative claims depend on six chosen numbers (Q, A_s, Delta psi, viewing angles, nu, and the reference mass/compactness), none fitted to X-ray data, and on seven background assumptions about the exterior solution, flux formula, spherical symmetry, and atmosphere-free emission.

free parameters (6)
  • Scalar charge Q = 0.5
    Chosen for STT1 and STT2 in Table 1, following the range used by Silva and Yunes; it sets the bending and drives the 80% flux difference.
  • Surface conformal factor A_s = 0.95 and 1.05
    Chosen by hand to bracket GR by plus or minus 5%; changes the Einstein-frame radius and the critical angle.
  • Spot semi-aperture Delta psi = 10 degrees
    Chosen to illustrate finite-size effects; smaller spots give more pronounced secondary-image peaks.
  • Viewing angles iota_0 and theta_s = 90 or 80 degrees
    Chosen to select configurations where the spot crosses or avoids the special region behind the star.
  • Rotational frequency nu = 0 or 700 Hz
    Chosen to separate gravitational bending effects from Doppler and time-delay effects.
  • Stellar mass M and compactness M/R = 2.1 solar masses and 0.284
    Chosen as a representative high-mass star at the GR critical compactness where multiple images appear.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math The Just metric (Eq. 14) is the exact exterior solution of the massless scalar-tensor field equations with V(phi)=0 and phi_infinity=0.
    Invoked in Section 2.3 to describe the spacetime outside the scalarized star.
  • domain assumption The Silva-Yunes differential flux formula (Eq. 28) correctly includes gravitational redshift, light bending, Doppler factor, and scalar coupling for an infinitesimal spot.
    Used as the starting point in Section 3; the paper does not re-derive it.
  • domain assumption A finite-size spot can be modeled by integrating the infinitesimal flux formula over the spot area and adding the secondary image when psi_c is greater than pi (Eq. 29, Section 3).
    The integration procedure references Turolla and Nobili and de Lima et al.; no independent validation is shown.
  • domain assumption The neutron star and its exterior spacetime remain spherical even at nu=700 Hz, so rotation-induced oblateness and frame dragging are neglected.
    Stated in Section 4; justified by the GR analysis of Cadeau et al. for near-equatorial geometry, not revalidated for STT.
  • domain assumption Surface emission is isotropic, bolometric, and atmosphere-free, so tangentially emitted photons are not attenuated.
    Acknowledged in the Conclusion as a simplification that could reduce the secondary-image flux.
  • domain assumption A scalar charge Q=0.5 is allowed for a 2.1 solar mass neutron star even though the double-pulsar bound Q<0.21 applies to about 1.4 solar mass stars, because scalarization can be mass-dependent.
    Section 2.4 argues the bound does not directly transfer to high-mass stars.
  • domain assumption Massive-scalar-field suppression from Ref. [42] makes the massless results an upper limit on flux differences.
    Section 3 states the order-of-magnitude threshold m_phi > 1.6e-12 eV above which differences vanish.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of X-ray pulsed light curves of highly compact neutron stars as probes of scalar-tensor theories of gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IGJVIRUC

@misc{pith2026241213867,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: X-ray pulsed light curves of highly compact neutron stars as probes of scalar-tensor theories of gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IGJVIRUC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.13867}
}
read the original abstract

The strong gravitational potential of neutron stars (NSs) makes them ideal astrophysical objects for testing extreme gravity phenomena. We explore the potential of NS X-ray pulsed lightcurve observations to probe deviations from general relativity (GR) within the scalar-tensor theory (STT) of gravity framework. We compute the flux from a single, circular, finite-size hot spot, accounting for light bending, Shapiro time delay, and Doppler effect. We focus on the high-compactness regime, i.e., close to the critical GR value GM/(Rc^2) = 0.284, over which multiple images of the spot appear and impact crucially the lightcurve. Our investigation is motivated by the increased sensitivity of the pulse to the scalar charge of the spacetime in such high compactness regimes, making these systems exceptionally suitable for scrutinizing deviations from GR, notably phenomena such as spontaneous scalarization, as predicted by STT. We find significant differences in NS observables, e.g., the flux of a single spot can differ up to 80% with respect to GR. Additionally, reasonable choices for the STT parameters that satisfy astrophysical constraints lead to changes in the NS radius relative to GR of up to approximately 10%. Consequently, scalar parameters might be better constrained when uncertainties in NS radii decrease, where this could occur with the advent of next-generation gravitational wave detectors, such as the Einstein Telescope and LISA, as well as future electromagnetic missions like eXTP and ATHENA. Thus, our findings suggest that accurate X-ray data of the NS surface emission, jointly with refined theoretical models, could constrain STTs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N¨ attil¨ a, J.J.E

    J. N¨ attil¨ a, J.J.E. Kajava, Fundamen- tal Physics with Neutron Stars (Springer 13 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 M/R=0.275 M/R=0.285 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 M/R=0.295 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 M/R=0.305 Fig. B9 Bolometric flux fixing the geometrical configura- tion to be ι0 = θs = 90° with a spot size ∆ψ = 10°. The GR lig...

    2022

  2. [2]

    Berti, E

    E. Berti, E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, L. Gualtieri, P. Pani, U. Sperhake, L.C. Stein, N. Wex, K. Yagi, T. Baker, C.P. Burgess, F.S. Coelho, D. Doneva, A.D. Felice, P.G. Ferreira, P.C.C. Freire, J. Healy, C. Herdeiro, M. Horbatsch, B. Kleihaus, A. Klein, K. Kokkotas, J. Kunz, P. Laguna, R.N. Lang, T.G.F. Li, T. Littenberg, A. Matas, S. Mirshekari, H. Okawa, E...

    2015

  3. [3]

    Fujii, K.i

    Y. Fujii, K.i. Maeda, The Scalar-Tensor The- ory of Gravitation. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2003)

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Doneva, F.M

    D.D. Doneva, F.M. Ramazano˘ glu, H.O. Silva, T.P. Sotiriou, S.S. Yazadjiev, Scalar- ization. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2211.01766 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2211.01766. arXiv:2211.01766 [gr-qc]

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.01766 2022

  5. [5]

    Damour, G

    T. Damour, G. Esposito-Farese, Tensor- multi-scalar theories of gravitation. Clas- sical and Quantum Gravity 9(9), 2093 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/ 9/9/015. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 0264-9381/9/9/015

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/ 1992

  6. [6]

    Damour, G

    T. Damour, G. Esposito-Far` ese, Nonpertur- bative strong-field effects in tensor-scalar the- ories of gravitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2220–2223 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.70.2220. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2220

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.2220 1993

  7. [8]

    A crucial ingredient of inflation

    V. Faraoni, A Crucial ingredient of infla- tion. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 40, 2259– 2294 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1012990305341. arXiv:hep-th/0009053

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  8. [9]

    Clifton, P.G

    T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, C. Sko- rdis, Modified Gravity and Cosmology. Phys. Rept. 513, 1–189 (2012). https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001. arXiv:1106.2476 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2012

Show all 76 references
  1. [11]

    Hollands, R.M

    S. Hollands, R.M. Wald, Quantum fields in curved spacetime. Phys. Rept. 574, 1–35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep. 2015.02.001. arXiv:1401.2026 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [12]

    Polchinski, String theory

    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 1: An intro- duction to the bosonic string . Cambridge 14 Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2007). https://doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511816079

    2007 doi

  3. [13]

    K.C.G. et. al., The Neutron star Inte- rior Composition Explorer (NICER): design and development, in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, vol. 9905, ed. by J.W.A. den Herder, T. Takahashi, M. Bautz. International Soci- ety for Optics and Photoni...

    2016 doi

  4. [14]

    Antoniadis, P.C.C

    J. Antoniadis, P.C.C. Freire, N. Wex, T.M. Tauris, R.S. Lynch, M.H. van Kerk- wijk, M. Kramer, C. Bassa, V.S. Dhillon, T. Driebe, J.W.T. Hessels, V.M. Kaspi, V.I. Kondratiev, N. Langer, T.R. Marsh, M.A. McLaughlin, T.T. Pennucci, S.M. Ransom, I.H. Stairs, J. van Leeuwen, J.P.W...

    2013 doi

  5. [15]

    Fonseca, H.T

    E. Fonseca, H.T. Cromartie, T.T. Pennucci, P.S. Ray, A.Y. Kirichenko, S.M. Ransom, P.B. Demorest, I.H. Stairs, Z. Arzoumanian, L. Guillemot, A. Parthasarathy, M. Kerr, I. Cognard, P.T. Baker, H. Blumer, P.R. Brook, M. DeCesar, T. Dolch, F.A. Dong, E.C. Ferrara, W. Fiore, N. Ga...

    2021 arXiv

  6. [16]

    Romani, D

    R.W. Romani, D. Kandel, A.V. Filippenko, T.G. Brink, W. Zheng, PSR J0952-0607: The Fastest and Heaviest Known Galactic Neutron Star. Astrophys.. J.l 934(2), L17 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ ac8007. arXiv:2207.05124 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [17]

    Sotani, U

    H. Sotani, U. Miyamoto, Pulse profiles of highly compact pulsars in general relativity. Phys. Rev. D 98, 044017 (2018). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.044017. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.98.044017

    2018 doi

  8. [18]

    Sotani, Pulse profiles from a pulsar in scalar-tensor gravity

    H. Sotani, Pulse profiles from a pulsar in scalar-tensor gravity. Phys. Rev. D 96, 104010 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.96.104010. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.104010

    2017 doi

  9. [20]

    Silva, N

    H.O. Silva, N. Yunes, Neutron star pulse profiles in scalar-tensor theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D 99, 044034 (2019). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.044034. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.99.044034

    2019 doi

  10. [21]

    R. Xu, Y. Gao, L. Shao, Strong-field effects in massive scalar-tensor gravity for slowly spin- ning neutron stars and application to x-ray pulsar pulse profiles. Phys. Rev. D 102, 064057 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.102.064057. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.110...

    2020 doi

  11. [22]

    Z. Hu, Y. Gao, R. Xu, L. Shao, Scalarized neutron stars in massive scalar-tensor grav- ity: X-ray pulsars and tidal deformability. Phys. Rev. D 104, 104014 (2021). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.104014. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.104014

    2021 doi

  12. [23]

    Sotani, Light curves from highly com- pact neutron stars with spot size effect

    H. Sotani, Light curves from highly com- pact neutron stars with spot size effect. Phys. Rev. D 101, 063013 (2020). https: 15 //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063013. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.101.063013

    2020 doi

  13. [24]

    Sotiriou, V

    T.P. Sotiriou, V. Faraoni, S. Liberati, The- ory of gravitation theories: A No-progress report. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 17, 399–423 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218271808012097. arXiv:0707.2748 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  14. [25]

    Bertotti, L

    B. Bertotti, L. Iess, P. Tortora, A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft. Nature 425, 374–376 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01997

    2003 doi

  15. [26]

    Kuan, A.G

    H.J. Kuan, A.G. Suvorov, D.D. Doneva, S.S. Yazadjiev, Gravitational waves from accretion-induced descalarization in massive scalar-tensor theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 121104 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.121104. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRev...

    2022 doi

  16. [27]

    Doneva, C.J

    D.D. Doneva, C.J. Kr¨ uger, K.V. Staykov, P.Y. Yordanov, Neutron stars in gauss- bonnet gravity: Nonlinear scalarization and gravitational phase transitions. Phys. Rev. D 108, 044054 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.044054. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ Ph...

    2023 doi

  17. [28]

    Ramazano˘ glu, Spontaneous growth of vector fields in gravity

    F.M. Ramazano˘ glu, Spontaneous growth of vector fields in gravity. Phys. Rev. D 96, 064009 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.96.064009. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.064009

    2017 doi

  18. [29]

    Zhao, P.C.C

    J. Zhao, P.C.C. Freire, M. Kramer, L. Shao, N. Wex, Closing a spontaneous-scalarization window with binary pulsars. Classi- cal and Quantum Gravity 39(11), 11LT01 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ ac69a3. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6382/ac69a3

    2022 doi

  19. [30]

    Faraoni, Nonminimal coupling of the scalar field and inflation

    V. Faraoni, Nonminimal coupling of the scalar field and inflation. Phys. Rev. D 53, 6813–6821 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.53.6813. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.6813

    1996 doi

  20. [32]

    Arapo˘ glu, K.Y

    A.S.m.c. Arapo˘ glu, K.Y. Ek¸ si, A.E. Y¨ ukselci, Neutron star structure in the presence of non- minimally coupled scalar fields. Phys. Rev. D 99, 064055 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.99.064055. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.064055

    2019 doi

  21. [33]

    Mendes, N

    R.F.P. Mendes, N. Ortiz, Highly compact neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories of gravity: Spontaneous scalarization versus gravitational collapse. Phys. Rev. D 93, 124035 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.93.124035. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.124035

    2016 doi

  22. [34]

    Just, Notizen: The motion of mercury according to the theory of thiry and lich- nerowicz

    K. Just, Notizen: The motion of mercury according to the theory of thiry and lich- nerowicz. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Naturforschung A 14(8), 751–751 (1959). https://doi.org/doi: 10.1515/zna-1959-0810. URL https://doi. org/10.1515/zna-1959-0810

    1959 doi

  23. [35]

    Coquereaux, G

    R. Coquereaux, G. Esposito-Farese, The The- ory of Kaluza-Klein-Jordan-Thiry revisited. Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. 52, 113–150 (1990)

    1990

  24. [36]

    Creci, T

    G. Creci, T. Hinderer, J. Steinhoff, Tidal properties of neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories of gravity. Phys. Rev. D 108(12), 124073 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.124073. arXiv:2308.11323 [gr- qc]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [37]

    Will, Theory and Experiment in Grav- itational Physics, 2nd edn

    C.M. Will, Theory and Experiment in Grav- itational Physics, 2nd edn. (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2018). https://doi.org/10. 1017/9781316338612

    2018

  26. [38]

    Freire, N

    P.C.C. Freire, N. Wex, G. Esposito-Far` ese, J.P.W. Verbiest, M. Bailes, B.A. Jacoby, M. Kramer, I.H. Stairs, J. Antoniadis, G.H. Janssen, The relativistic pulsar-white dwarf binary PSR J1738+0333 - II. The 16 most stringent test of scalar-tensor grav- ity. Monthly Notices of ...

    2012

  27. [39]

    Kramer, I.H

    M. Kramer, I.H. Stairs, R.N. Manch- ester, N. Wex, A.T. Deller, W.A. Coles, M. Ali, M. Burgay, F. Camilo, I. Cognard, T. Damour, G. Desvignes, R.D. Ferdman, P.C.C. Freire, S. Grondin, L. Guillemot, G.B. Hobbs, G. Janssen, R. Karuppusamy, D.R. Lorimer, A.G. Lyne, J.W. McKee, M....

    2021

  28. [40]

    Freire, N

    P.C.C. Freire, N. Wex, Gravity experiments with radio pulsars. Living Reviews in Rel- ativity 27(1), 5 (2024). https://doi.org/10. 1007/s41114-024-00051-y. arXiv:2407.16540 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [41]

    Horbatsch, C.P

    M.W. Horbatsch, C.P. Burgess, Model- independent comparisons of pulsar tim- ings to scalar-tensor gravity. Classi- cal and Quantum Gravity 29(24), 245004 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/ 29/24/245004. arXiv:1107.3585 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  30. [42]

    Ramazano˘ glu, F

    F.M. Ramazano˘ glu, F. Pretorius, Spon- taneous scalarization with massive fields. Phys. Rev. D 93, 064005 (2016). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.064005. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.93.064005

    2016 doi

  31. [43]

    Doneva, S.S

    D.D. Doneva, S.S. Yazadjiev, N. Stergioulas, K.D. Kokkotas, Rapidly rotating neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories of grav- ity (2014). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 1309.0605. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1309

    2014 doi arXiv

  32. [44]

    Yazadjiev, D.D

    S.S. Yazadjiev, D.D. Doneva, D. Popchev, Slowly rotating neutron stars in scalar- tensor theories with a massive scalar field (2016). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 1602.04766. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1602. 04766. ArXiv:1602.04766

    2016 doi arXiv

  33. [45]

    Rosca-Mead, C.J

    R. Rosca-Mead, C.J. Moore, U. Sperhake, M. Agathos, D. Gerosa, Structure of Neutron Stars in Massive Scalar-Tensor Gravity. Sym- metry 12(9), 1384 (2020). https://doi.org/ 10.3390/sym12091384. URL https://www. mdpi.com/2073-8994/12/9/1384

    2020 doi

  34. [46]

    Pechenick, C

    K.R. Pechenick, C. Ftaclas, J.M. Cohen, Hot spots on neutron stars - The near-field grav- itational lens. Astrophys.. J. 274, 846–857 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1086/161498

    1983 doi

  35. [47]

    Poutanen, A.M

    J. Poutanen, A.M. Beloborodov, Pulse profiles of millisecond pulsars and their Fourier amplitudes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 373(2), 836–844 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-2966.2006.11088.x. URL https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11088.x...

    2006

  36. [48]

    Cadeau, S.M

    C. Cadeau, S.M. Morsink, D. Leahy, S.S. Campbell, Light curves for rapidly rotating neutron stars. The Astrophysical Journal 654(1), 458 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1086/ 509103. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/ 509103

    2007

  37. [49]

    Watts, W

    A.L. Watts, W. Yu, J. Poutanen, S. Zhang, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Bogdanov, L. Ji, A. Patruno, T.E. Riley, P. Bakala, A. Baykal, F. Bernardini, I. Bombaci, E. Brown, Y. Cavecchi, D. Chakrabarty, J. Chenevez, N. Degenaar, M. Del Santo, T. Di Salvo, V. Doroshenko, M. Falanga, R.D. ...

    2019 arXiv

  38. [50]

    Riley, et al., A N ICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation

    T.E. Riley, et al., A N ICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 887(1), L21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ ab481c. arXiv:1912.05702 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [51]

    Miller, et al., PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from N ICER Data and Impli- cations for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter

    M.C. Miller, et al., PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from N ICER Data and Impli- cations for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter. Astrophys. J. Lett. 887(1), L24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ ab50c5. arXiv:1912.05705 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [52]

    Miller, F.K

    M.C. Miller, F.K. Lamb, A.J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K.C. Gen- dreau, S. Guillot, W.C.G. Ho, J.M. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein, S.M. Morsink, P.S. Ray, M.T. Wolff, C.L. Baker, T. Cazeau, S. Man- thripragada, C.B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, S. Pollard, I. Cognard, H.T. C...

    2021 arXiv

  41. [53]

    Riley, A.L

    T.E. Riley, A.L. Watts, P.S. Ray, S. Bog- danov, S. Guillot, S.M. Morsink, A.V. Bilous, Z. Arzoumanian, D. Choudhury, J.S. Deneva, K.C. Gendreau, A.K. Harding, W.C.G. Ho, J.M. Lattimer, M. Loewenstein, R.M. Ludlam, C.B. Markwardt, T. Okajima, C. Prescod-Weinstein, R.A. Remilla...

    2021 arXiv

  42. [54]

    Choudhury, et al., A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pul- sar: PSR J0437–4715

    D. Choudhury, et al., A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pul- sar: PSR J0437–4715. Astrophys. J. Lett. 971(1), L20 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/ad5a6f. arXiv:2407.06789 [astro- ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [55]

    Bilous, A.L

    A.V. Bilous, A.L. Watts, A.K. Hard- ing, T.E. Riley, Z. Arzoumanian, S. Bog- danov, K.C. Gendreau, P.S. Ray, S. Guil- lot, W.C.G. Ho, D. Chakrabarty, A nicer view of psr j0030+0451: Evidence for a global-scale multipolar magnetic field. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 887(1)...

    2019 doi

  44. [56]

    Beloborodov, Gravitational bending of light near compact objects

    A.M. Beloborodov, Gravitational bending of light near compact objects. The Astrophysi- cal Journal 566(2), L85 (2002). https://doi. org/10.1086/339511. URL https://dx.doi. org/10.1086/339511

    2002 doi

  45. [57]

    Shapiro, S.A

    S.L. Shapiro, S.A. Teukolsky, Black holes, white dwarfs and neutron stars. The physics of compact objects (1983). https://doi.org/ 10.1002/9783527617661

    1983 doi

  46. [58]

    Engvik, E

    L. Engvik, E. Osnes, M. Hjorth-Jensen, G. Bao, E. Ostgaard, Asymmetric Nuclear Matter and Neutron Star Properties. Astro- phys.. J. 469, 794 (1996). https://doi.org/10. 1086/177827. arXiv:nucl-th/9509016 [nucl- th]

    1996 arXiv

  47. [59]

    M¨ uther, M

    H. M¨ uther, M. Prakash, T. Ainsworth, The nuclear symmetry energy in relativistic brueckner-hartree-fock cal- culations. Physics Letters B 199(4), 469–474 (1987). https://doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91611-X. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article...

    1987

  48. [60]

    Mendes, T

    R.F.P. Mendes, T. Ottoni, Scalar charges and pulsar-timing observables in the pres- ence of nonminimally coupled scalar fields. Phys. Rev. D 99, 124003 (2019). https: 18 //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.124003. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.99.124003

    2019 doi

  49. [61]

    P´ etri, Multipolar electromagnetic fields around neutron stars: exact vac- uum solutions and related properties

    J. P´ etri, Multipolar electromagnetic fields around neutron stars: exact vac- uum solutions and related properties. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 450(1), 714–742 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv598. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv598. http...

    2015 doi

  50. [62]

    de Lima, J.P

    R.C.R. de Lima, J.P. Pereira, J.G. Coelho, R.C. Nunes, P.E. Stecchini, M. Cas- tro, P. Gomes, R.R. da Silva, C.V. Rodrigues, J.C.N. de Araujo, M. Bejger, P. Haensel, J.L. Zdunik, Evidence for 3XMM J185246.6+003317 as a massive magne- tar with a low magnetic field. Journal of H...

    2024 arXiv

  51. [63]

    Morisaki, T

    S. Morisaki, T. Suyama, Spontaneous scalar- ization with an extremely massive field and heavy neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D96, 084026 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 96.084026. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.96.084026

    2017 doi

  52. [64]

    Turolla, L

    R. Turolla, L. Nobili, Pulse profiles from thermally emitting neutron stars. The Astrophysical Journal 768(2), 147 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/768/2/147. URL https: //dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/147

    2013 doi

  53. [65]

    de Lima, J.G

    R.C.R. de Lima, J.G. Coelho, J.P. Pereira, C.V. Rodrigues, J.A. Rueda, Evidence for a multipolar magnetic field in sgr j1745-2900 from x-ray light-curve analy- sis. The Astrophysical Journal 889(2), 165 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ab65f4. URL https://dx.doi.org/...

    2020 doi

  54. [66]

    P. Pani, E. Berti, Slowly rotating neutron stars in scalar-tensor theories. Phys. Rev. D 90, 024025 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.90.024025. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.024025

    2014 doi

  55. [67]

    Shao, Degeneracy in studying the supranuclear equation of state and mod- ified gravity with neutron stars

    L. Shao, Degeneracy in studying the supranuclear equation of state and mod- ified gravity with neutron stars. AIP Conference Proceedings 2127(1), 020016 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5117806. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5117806. https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article- pdf/...

    2019 doi

  56. [68]

    Ascenzi, V

    S. Ascenzi, V. Graber, N. Rea, Neutron- star measurements in the multi-messenger era. Astroparticle Physics p. 102935 (2024). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2024.102935. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0927650524000124

    2024

  57. [69]

    Chatziioannou, Uncertainty limits on neu- tron star radius measurements with gravita- tional waves

    K. Chatziioannou, Uncertainty limits on neu- tron star radius measurements with gravita- tional waves. Phys. Rev. D 105(8), 084021 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 105.084021. arXiv:2108.12368 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  58. [70]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, J. N¨ attil¨ a, A. Vuorinen, Evidence for quark-matter cores in massive neutron stars. Nature Physics 16(9), 907–910 (2020). https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41567-020-0914-9. arXiv:1903.09121 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [71]

    Pereira, M

    J.P. Pereira, M. Bejger, J.L. Zdunik, P. Haensel, Differentiating between sharp and smoother phase transitions in neu- tron stars. Phys. Rev. D 105(12), 123015 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 105.123015. arXiv:2201.01217 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  60. [72]

    Gorda, K

    T. Gorda, K. Hebeler, A. Kurkela, A. Schwenk, A. Vuorinen, Constraints on Strong Phase Transitions in Neutron Stars. Astrophys. J. 955(2), 100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aceefb. arXiv:2212.10576 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [73]

    Pereira, C.V

    J.P. Pereira, C.V. Flores, G. Lugones, Phase Transition Effects on the Dynamical Stabil- ity of Hybrid Neutron Stars. Astrophys.. J. 860, 12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/aabfbf. arXiv:1706.09371 [gr-qc] 19

    2018 arXiv

  62. [74]

    Di Clemente, M

    F. Di Clemente, M. Mannarelli, F. Tonelli, Reliable description of the radial oscillations of compact stars. Phys. Rev. D 101(10), 103003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.101.103003. arXiv:2002.09483 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [75]

    Tonetto, G

    L. Tonetto, G. Lugones, Discontinuity grav- ity modes in hybrid stars: Assessing the role of rapid and slow phase conver- sions. Phys. Rev. D 101(12), 123029 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 101.123029. arXiv:2003.01259 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  64. [76]

    Lugones, A.G

    G. Lugones, A.G. Grunfeld, Phase Conver- sions in Neutron Stars: Implications for Stel- lar Stability and Gravitational Wave Astro- physics. Universe 7(12), 493 (2021). https: //doi.org/10.3390/universe7120493

    2021 doi

  65. [77]

    Gon¸ calves, L

    V.P. Gon¸ calves, L. Lazzari, Impact of slow conversions on hybrid stars with sequential QCD phase transitions. European Phys- ical Journal C 82(4), 288 (2022). https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10273-5. arXiv:2201.03304 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  66. [78]

    P.B. Rau, A. Sedrakian, Two first-order phase transitions in hybrid compact stars: Higher-order multiplet stars, reaction modes, and intermediate conversion speeds. Phys. Rev. D 107(10), 103042 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.103042. arXiv:2212.09828 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [79]

    Pereira, M

    J.P. Pereira, M. Bejger, L. Tonetto, G. Lugones, P. Haensel, J.L. Zdunik, M. Sieniawska, Probing Elastic Quark Phases in Hybrid Stars with Radius Mea- surements. Astrophys. J. 910(2), 145 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abe633. arXiv:2011.06361 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [80]

    Silva, in Recent Progress on Gravity Tests: Challenges and Future Perspectives, ed

    H.O. Silva, in Recent Progress on Gravity Tests: Challenges and Future Perspectives, ed. by C. Bambi, A. C´ ardenas- Avenda˜ no (Springer Nature, Singapore, 2024), pp. 101–147. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-981-97-2871-8 4. URL https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2871-8 4 20

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.