Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 1 cited by

Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of pseudoscalar particles in the $\gamma\gamma\tau_{\text{had}}\tau_{\text{had}}$ final state using $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first search for Higgs boson decays into two pseudoscalars where one decays to two photons and the other to two hadronically decaying tau leptons, finding no significant excess and setting 95% CL branching-ratio…

desk verdict First combined gamma-gamma tau_had tau_had search with an honest background systematic; the residual shape risk is real but controlled, and the limits are what they say. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14046 v2 pith:2NWWHRBE submitted 2024-12-18 hep-ex

ATLAS Collaboration This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ex PACS 13.85.Qk14.80.Bn14.80.Cp
keywords Higgsbosonexoticdecayspseudoscalarparticlesdiphotonfinalstatetauleptonpairsboosteddi-tautaggerATLAS13TeVproton-protoncollisionsbranchingratioupperlimits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish whether the 125 GeV Higgs boson can decay into a pair of new light pseudoscalar particles, $H\to aa$, with one $a$ decaying to two photons and the other to a pair of hadronically decaying tau leptons. It is the first search for this $\gamma\gamma\tau_{\text{had}}\tau_{\text{had}}$ final state. Using 140 fb$^{-1}$ of 13 TeV proton-proton collisions, the analysis finds the observed diphoton mass spectrum consistent with the Standard Model background. It therefore converts the null result into model-independent upper limits on the branching ratio, ruling out $\mathcal{B}(H\to aa\to\gamma\gamma\tau\tau)$ above 0.2% to 2% for $a$-boson masses of 10-60 GeV. A new reconstruction for collimated tau pairs extends sensitivity to low masses where the taus are boosted and overlapping.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is a new dedicated reconstruction of collimated hadronic tau pairs: a large-radius jet is reclustered into subjets and a boosted decision tree scores the di-tau hypothesis using track and calorimeter substructure, with opposite-charge subjets required; this boosted di-tau tagger, combined with a resolved di-tau selection, recovers sensitivity at low $m_a$. The observable is the diphoton invariant mass, with signal modelled by a double-sided Crystal Ball function and background by a sigmoid-times-exponential function, smoothed by Gaussian-process regression, with a spurious-signal systematic derived from template variations with inverted tau selections.

What would settle it

Look at a high-statistics control sample in the same mass range, for example events with same-charge di-tau pairs or inverted photon identification but otherwise identical selections; a localised bump in the $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ distribution in that sample at the same mass as the reported 39 or 48 GeV excesses, larger than the assigned spurious-signal systematic, would show the background model can create fake signals and would weaken the quoted limits.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the central discovery claim is a null result with exclusion power: no significant excess of events is observed above the Standard Model background expectation in the diphoton invariant mass distribution, and the observed 95% CL upper limits on $\mathcal{B}(H\to aa\to\gamma\gamma\tau\tau)$ range from 0.2% to 2% (expected 0.5% to 1%) for pseudoscalar masses between 10 and 60 GeV. The most significant local deviations, at $m_a=39$ and 48 GeV, have significances of 2.2$\sigma$ and 2.1$\sigma$, consistent with statistical fluctuations. This establishes the first constraint on the $\gamma\gamma\tau_{\text{had}}\tau_{\text{had}}$ final state and demonstrates that a dedicated boosted di-tau tagger can recover signal efficiency for $a$-boson masses below about 25 GeV.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on the assumption that the background diphoton mass spectrum is smooth in the signal region and that its true shape is captured by the analytic function and the template variations used to estimate the spurious-signal systematic; if a real background structure deviates from this in a way those templates do not cover, the fitted signal and limits would be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 95% CL upper limits of 0.2% to 2% on $\mathcal{B}(H\to aa\to\gamma\gamma\tau\tau)$ are the first constraints on this final state and rule out pseudoscalar masses in 10-60 GeV with branching ratios above the quoted range.
  • Models of exotic Higgs decays, including two-Higgs-doublet and dark-matter scenarios, that predict $H\to aa\to\gamma\gamma\tau\tau$ rates above these limits are disfavoured.
  • The boosted di-tau tagger increases signal acceptance at low $a$-boson masses, where the two taus are collimated, and can be applied to other searches for boosted tau pairs.
  • The observed 2.2$\sigma$ and 2.1$\sigma$ excesses at 39 and 48 GeV do not reach the 5$\sigma$ threshold and are interpreted as consistent with background.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the final state combines a photon-pair trigger and mass resolution with a mass-coupled tau-pair signature, the same analysis strategy could be combined with $H\to aa\to 4\gamma$ and $\tau\tau bb$ channels to place joint model-independent bounds on the $H\to aa$ coupling over a wider mass range.
  • Editorial inference: a natural next step is to apply the boosted di-tau tagger to higher-statistics control processes such as $Z\to\tau\tau+$jets to calibrate the scale factor at the low $p_{\text{T,vis}}$ regime directly rather than extrapolating with a 50% uncertainty.
  • Editorial inference: the local excesses at 39 and 48 GeV, while insignificant, define specific mass points where a future dataset could either confirm a signal or tighten limits, so a targeted follow-up scan in those bins would be informative.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a search for exotic Higgs boson decays H→aa→γγτhadτhad using 140 fb−1 of pp collisions at √s=13 TeV recorded by ATLAS in Run 2. The analysis targets a-boson masses between 10 and 60 GeV, reconstructing the diphoton system with a boosted selection and the hadronic tau pair with either resolved tau leptons or a dedicated boosted di-tau tagger. The background is estimated from data with an analytic sigmoid-times-exponential function, validated on control templates; signal shapes are taken from Monte Carlo simulation. No significant excess is found, and 95% CL upper limits on B(H→aa→γγττ) are set in the range 0.2%–2% observed and 0.5%–1% expected.

Significance. If the result holds, this is the first constraint on the γγττ final state in the H→aa search program and extends coverage to a-boson masses down to 10 GeV. The analysis uses the full Run 2 dataset, a data-driven background with a spurious-signal closure test, and a complete systematic accounting; the dominant 63% systematic on the boosted di-tau object at ma=10 GeV and the 27% theory uncertainty at 50 GeV are reported transparently. The stress-test concern about background closure is a residual modelling risk rather than a demonstrated flaw, because the spurious-signal systematic is evaluated on multiple template variations and found to be below 8% of the expected statistical uncertainty.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3] The abstract describes the limits as 'model-independent', but Section 3 states that only the ggF Higgs production process is considered and other production modes are ignored; since the branching-ratio extraction assumes the ggF cross-section, I suggest clarifying that the limits are model-independent with respect to the a-boson decay model but assume SM Higgs production via ggF.
  2. [Section 6 and Table 1] The background modelling uncertainty is quoted as '<0.08 σstat' and '0.16 events'; the text should define σstat as the expected statistical uncertainty of a fitted signal and explain how the spurious-signal envelope enters the likelihood as a nuisance parameter.
  3. [Section 7 and Figure 5(a)] The local p-values of 2.2σ at ma=39 GeV and 2.1σ at ma=48 GeV are reported without a trial-corrected global significance; since the search scans multiple mass hypotheses, a brief statement on the look-elsewhere effect would aid interpretation.
  4. [Section 4.1] The boosted di-tau scale factor extrapolation uncertainty of 50% is a major contributor to the low-mass systematic; the text should state whether this uncertainty is treated as fully correlated across mass points and how it is constrained in the fit.
  5. [Figure 4 caption] The bottom panel label 'Data-Fit' is not fully consistent with the caption text; please specify the units and the definition of the uncertainty band shown.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the branching-ratio extraction is a data-driven unbinned fit against a background shape validated on control templates, with signal shapes from MC.

full rationale

The central claim, absence of an excess and the 95% CL limits on B(H→aa→γγττ), rests on an unbinned profile-likelihood fit to the observed m_γγ distribution in the signal region. The background is not defined in terms of the fitted signal: its functional form (sigmoid times exponential, Section 5.2) is anchored to a template built from simulated diphoton events and photon-ID-inverted control data with inverted di-τ selections, and the resulting bias is then quantified in a spurious-signal test (less than about 5–8% of the template statistical uncertainty). Signal shapes come from a double-sided Crystal Ball parameterisation fitted to Monte Carlo samples, not from the data. The use of the previous ATLAS boosted-diphoton analysis (Ref. [26]) for Gaussian-process smoothing and for the closely-spaced-photon trigger uncertainty is methodological inheritance; it is not load-bearing for the exclusion claim and does not supply either the background shape or the signal yield. No parameter is fitted to the signal-region data and then renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no definitional identity connects B(H→aa→γγττ) with the background template. The residual risk that the chosen analytic function mismodels the true background in a way not covered by the template variations is a correctness risk, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The analysis relies on a data-driven background fit with four floating parameters, a signal model calibrated on MC, standard ATLAS object calibrations, and several physics assumptions (ggF-only production, narrow width, negligible interference). The a boson itself is not invented by this paper; it is a well-motivated BSM hypothesis. The heavy reliance on the boosted di-tau scale-factor extrapolation is an experimental systematic, not a free parameter of the physics claim.

free parameters (2)
  • Background template parameters N, delta_sgmd, tau_sgmd, lambda_exp = not quoted
    Fit to the background template in the m_γγ range 6 to 68 GeV (Section 5.2) and used in the unbinned likelihood; the limit is directly sensitive to this shape.
  • Signal DSCB shape parameters = not quoted
    Extracted from fits to simulated signal samples and parameterized linearly vs m_a (Section 5.1). These are calibration parameters from Monte Carlo, not fitted to collision data, and are included as nuisance parameters in the fit.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Only ggF Higgs production contributes to the signal, with sigma(ggF)=48.5 +/- 2.4 pb; VBF, VH and ttH are neglected.
    Section 3 states that only ggF is considered, about 87% of the total cross-section. Section 6 converts the fitted yield into B(H to aa to gamma gamma tau tau) using this ggF-only normalization. If a BSM scenario enhances non-ggF production, the quoted B limits do not directly apply to the total rate.
  • domain assumption The a-boson width is 4 MeV and signal-background interference is negligible.
    Section 3 sets the width to 4 MeV, consistent with the narrow-width approximation, and states that interference effects are expected to be small and are neglected. The derived limits may not hold for broad resonances.
  • domain assumption The m_γγ background in the signal region is smooth and well described by the analytic sigmoid-times-exponential function.
    Section 5.2 builds background templates using inverted di-tau selections and fits the analytic function. The spurious-signal systematic, reduced below 8% of the statistical uncertainty after Gaussian-process smoothing, is the main protection against this assumption failing.
  • domain assumption The boosted di-tau BDT scale factor measured in Z to tau tau plus gamma events extrapolates to the lower p_T range of this search with a 50% uncertainty.
    Section 4.1 reports SF=1.00 +/- 0.35 (stat) +/- 0.13 (syst) in the calibration regime and assigns an extrapolation uncertainty of 50%. This contributes the dominant 63% systematic on B at m_a=10 GeV.
  • domain assumption The asymptotic CLs approximation is valid for the limit calculation.
    Section 6 states the asymptotic approximation was validated with pseudo-experiments and agrees within 10%. This is a standard statistical tool for LHC searches.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of pseudoscalar particles in the $\gamma\gamma\tau_{\text{had}}\tau_{\text{had}}$ final state using $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2NWWHRBE

@misc{pith2026241214046,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of pseudoscalar particles in the $\gamma\gamma\tau_\texthad\tau_\texthad$ final state using $pp$ collisions at $\sqrts=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2NWWHRBE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14046}
}
abstract

A search for exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson into a pair of new spin-0 particles, $H \to aa$, where one decays into a photon pair and the other into a $\tau$-lepton pair, is presented. Hadronic decays of the $\tau$-leptons are considered and reconstructed using a dedicated tagger for collimated $\tau$-lepton pairs. The search uses 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV recorded between 2015 and 2018 by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. The search is performed in the mass range of the $a$ boson between 10 GeV and 60 GeV. No significant excess of events is observed above the Standard Model background expectation. Model-independent upper limits at 95$\% $ confidence level are set on the branching ratio of the Higgs boson to the $\gamma\gamma\tau\tau$ final state, $\mathcal{B}(H\to aa\to \gamma\gamma\tau\tau)$, ranging from 0.2$\% $ to 2$\% $, depending on the $a$-boson mass hypothesis.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Search for Lorentz-boosted di-$\tau$ resonances produced in association with top quark pairs in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

    hep-ex 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    No excess is seen; ATLAS sets a 0.19 fb model-independent visible cross-section limit and 2HDM σ×BR limits of 0.4–0.05 pb for ma = 20–85 GeV using boosted di-τ reconstruction.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, arXiv: 1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 30, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    ATLAS Collaboration, A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature607 (2022) 52, arXiv:2207.00092 [hep-ex], Erratum: Nature612 (2022) E24. 15

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    CMS Collaboration, A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature607 (2022) 60, arXiv:2207.00043 [hep-ex], Erratum: Nature623 (2023) E4

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Curtin et al.,Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys

    D. Curtin et al.,Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 075004, arXiv: 1312.4992 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    B. A. Dobrescu and K. T. Matchev, Light axion within the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, JHEP09(2000) 031, arXiv: hep-ph/0008192

    arXiv 2000

  7. [7]

    Ellwanger, J

    U. Ellwanger, J. F. Gunion, C. Hugonie and S. Moretti, Towards a no lose theorem for NMSSM Higgs discovery at the LHC, (2003), arXiv: hep-ph/0305109

    arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    Dermíšek and J

    R. Dermíšek and J. F. Gunion,Escaping the Large Fine-Tuning and Little Hierarchy Problems in the Next to Minimal Supersymmetric Model andℎ→𝑎𝑎 Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005), arXiv: hep-ph/0502105 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2005

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Chang, R

    S. Chang, R. Dermíšek, J. F. Gunion and N. Weiner,Nonstandard Higgs Boson Decays, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.58 (2008) 75, arXiv:0801.4554 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Silveira and A

    V. Silveira and A. Zee,SCALAR PHANTOMS, Phys. Lett. B161 (1985) 136

    1985

  3. [11]

    Pospelov, A

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz and M. Voloshin,Secluded WIMP Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B662 (2008) 53, arXiv: 0711.4866 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  4. [12]

    S. Ipek, D. McKeen and A. E. Nelson, Renormalizable model for the Galactic Center gamma-ray excess from dark matter annihilation, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 055021, arXiv:1404.3716 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Profumo, M

    S. Profumo, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy, Singlet Higgs phenomenology and the electroweak phase transition, JHEP08(2007) 010, arXiv: 0705.2425 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Blinov, J

    N. Blinov, J. Kozaczuk, D. E. Morrissey and C. Tamarit, Electroweak Baryogenesis from Exotic Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015) 035012, arXiv:1504.05195 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Craig, A

    N. Craig, A. Katz, M. Strassler and R. Sundrum,Naturalness in the Dark at the LHC, JHEP 07(2015) 105, arXiv:1501.05310 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Curtin and C

    D. Curtin and C. B. Verhaaren,Discovering Uncolored Naturalness in Exotic Higgs Decays, JHEP12(2015) 1, arXiv:1506.06141 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for decays of the Higgs boson into a pair of pseudoscalar particles decaying into𝑏 ¯𝑏𝜏+𝜏− using𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 052013, arXiv:2407.01335 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for short- and long-lived axion-like particles in𝐻→𝑎𝑎→ 4𝛾 decays with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 742, arXiv: 2312.03306 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for the decay of the Higgs boson to a𝑍 boson and a light pseudoscalar particle decaying to two photons, Phys. Lett. B850 (2024) 138536, arXiv: 2312.01942 [hep-ex]. 16

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson to a pair of pseudoscalars in the 𝜇𝜇𝑏𝑏 and𝜏𝜏𝑏𝑏 final states, Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 493, arXiv:2402.13358 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    rep., CERN, 2024, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2911497

    Search for light pseudoscalar bosons produced in Higgs boson decays in the4𝜏 and 2𝜇2𝜏 final states in proton-proton collisions at√𝑠= 13 TeV, tech. rep., CERN, 2024, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2911497

    2024

  14. [22]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for the exotic decay of the Higgs boson into two light pseudoscalars with four photons in the final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, JHEP07 (2023) 148, arXiv: 2208.01469 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson into a𝑍 boson and a pseudoscalar particle in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV, Phys. Lett. B852 (2024) 138582, arXiv: 2311.00130 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    G. C. Branco et al.,Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept.516 (2012) 1, arXiv:1106.0034 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  17. [25]

    T. D. Lee,A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation, Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 1226, ed. by G. Feinberg

    1973

  18. [26]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for boosted diphoton resonances in the10 to 70GeV mass range using 138fb−1 of 13TeV𝑝𝑝 collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP07(2023) 155, arXiv: 2211.04172 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3 (2008) S08003

    2008

  20. [28]

    Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13 (2018) P07017

    G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13 (2018) P07017

    2018

  21. [29]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, (2024), arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15 (2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [34]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv: 1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

    2010 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250

    2003

  28. [36]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The simulation principle and performance of the ATLAS fast calorimeter simulation FastCaloSim, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2010-013, 2010,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1300517

    2010

  29. [37]

    Sjöstrand, S

    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178 (2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]. 17

    2008 arXiv

  30. [38]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965

    2016

  31. [39]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867 (2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Hamilton, P

    K. Hamilton, P. Nason, E. Re and G. Zanderighi,NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production, JHEP10(2013) 222, arXiv:1309.0017 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Nason and C

    P. Nason and C. Oleari, NLO Higgs boson production via vector-boson fusion matched with shower in POWHEG, JHEP02(2010) 037, arXiv:0911.5299 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Alioli, P

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06 (2010) 043, arXiv: 1002.2581 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    2004 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Frixione, P

    S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput

    T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191 (2015) 159, arXiv: 1410.3012 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the𝑍/𝛾∗ boson transverse momentum distribution in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 7TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP09(2014) 145, arXiv: 1406.3660 [hep-ex]

    2014 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Butterworth et al.,PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J

    J. Butterworth et al.,PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G43(2016) 023001, arXiv: 1510.03865 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv: 1905.09127 [hep-ph]

    E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv: 1905.09127 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Höche, F

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, A critical appraisal of NLO+PS matching methods, JHEP09 (2012) 049, arXiv: 1111.1220 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Höche, F

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case, JHEP04 (2013) 027, arXiv: 1207.5030 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Catani, F

    S. Catani, F. Krauss, B. R. Webber and R. Kuhn,QCD Matrix Elements + Parton Showers, JHEP11(2001) 063, arXiv:hep-ph/0109231

    2001 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Höche, F

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, S. Schumann and F. Siegert,QCD matrix elements and truncated showers, JHEP05(2009) 053, arXiv:0903.1219 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  45. [53]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC run II, JHEP04(2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Schumann and F

    S. Schumann and F. Krauss, A parton shower algorithm based on Catani–Seymour dipole factorisation, JHEP03 (2008) 038, arXiv: 0709.1027 [hep-ph]. 18

    2008 arXiv

  47. [55]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Vertex Reconstruction Performance of the ATLAS Detector at√𝑠= 13 TeV, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-026, 2015,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2037717

    2015

  48. [56]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data, JINST14(2019) P12006, arXiv: 1908.00005 [hep-ex]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Topological cell clustering in the ATLAS calorimeters and its performance in LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 490, arXiv:1603.02934 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the inclusive isolated prompt photon cross section in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 7TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 052005, arXiv: 1012.4389 [hep-ex]

    2011 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The catchment area of jets, JHEP04(2008) 005, arXiv: 0802.1188 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and S. Sapeta,On the characterisation of the underlying event, JHEP 04(2010) 065, arXiv:0912.4926 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  53. [61]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Electron and photon energy calibration with the ATLAS detector using LHC Run 2 data, JINST19(2024) P02009, arXiv:2309.05471 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  54. [62]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2𝑝𝑝 collision data set at√𝑠= 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 578, arXiv: 2012.00578 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The anti-𝑘𝑡 jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04(2008) 063, arXiv: 0802.1189 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Cacciari, G

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 1896, arXiv: 1111.6097 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  57. [65]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Jet reconstruction and performance using particle flow with the ATLAS Detector, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 466, arXiv:1703.10485 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Jet energy scale measurements and their systematic uncertainties in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠= 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 072002, arXiv: 1703.09665 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  59. [67]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Reconstruction, Energy Calibration, and Identification of Hadronically Decaying Tau Leptons in the ATLAS Experiment for Run-2 of the LHC, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-045, 2015, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2064383

    2015

  60. [68]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using neural networks in the ATLAS experiment, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2019-033, 2019,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2688062

    2019

  61. [69]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Reconstruction and identification of pairs of collimated𝜏-leptons decaying hadronically using√𝑠= 13TeV𝑝𝑝 collision data with the ATLAS detector, (2024), arXiv: 2411.09357 [hep-ex]

    2024 arXiv

  62. [70]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for Scalar Diphoton Resonances in the Mass Range 65–600GeV with the ATLAS Detector in𝑝𝑝 Collision Data at√𝑠= 8TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 171801, arXiv: 1407.6583 [hep-ex]. 19

    2014 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Oreglia, A Study of the Reactions𝜓′→𝛾𝛾𝜓, PhD thesis, 1980, url: https://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/getdoc/slac-r-236.pdf

    M. Oreglia, A Study of the Reactions𝜓′→𝛾𝛾𝜓, PhD thesis, 1980, url: https://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/getdoc/slac-r-236.pdf

    1980

  64. [72]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of isolated-photon pair production in𝑝𝑝 collisions at√𝑠= 7TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP01(2013) 086, arXiv:1211.1913 [hep-ex]

    2013 arXiv

  65. [73]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Recommendations for the Modeling of Smooth Backgrounds, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2020-028, 2020,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2743717

    2020

  66. [74]

    C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning), The MIT Press, 2005,isbn: 026218253X

    2005

  67. [75]

    Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs 2, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2017), arXiv: 1610.07922 [hep-ph]

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs 2, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2017), arXiv: 1610.07922 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Cowan, K

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1554, arXiv: 1007.1727 [physics.data-an], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2501

    2011 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Junk, Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics, Nucl

    T. Junk, Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A434 (1999) 435, arXiv:hep-ex/9902006

    1999 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Demokritos

    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Computing Acknowledgements, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2025-001, 2025, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2922210. 20 The ATLAS Collaboration G. Aad 104, E. Aakvaag 17, B. Abbott 123, S. Abdelhameed 119a, K. Abeling 56, N.J. Abicht 50, S.H. Abidi 30, M. Aboelela 46, ...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.