Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Zeptojoule Calorimetry

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A calorimeter resolves microwave pulses under one zeptojoule

desk verdict A real experimental milestone, but Eq. (12) uses the wrong variance transform and the central sub-zeptojoule claim needs reanalysis before it stands. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14079 v1 pith:3FIUJ7WY submitted 2024-12-18 physics.ins-det

András Gunyhó , Kassius Kohvakka , Qi-Ming Chen , Jean-Philippe Girard , Roope Kokkoniemi , Wei Liu , Mikko Möttönen This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-det
keywords calorimetryzeptojouleenergyresolutionSNSJosephsonjunctionsmatchedfilteringmicrowavephotondetectioncryogenicbolometernoiseequivalentpower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that an SNS (superconductor–normal-conductor–superconductor) thermal sensor, operated as a calorimeter rather than a bolometer, can resolve the energy of individual 1-microsecond, 8.4 GHz microwave pulses down to a full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) resolution finer than $0.95$ zeptojoule, about $170$ photons at that frequency. This matters because no calorimeter has previously demonstrated energy resolution in the single-zeptojoule range; the best earlier calorimetric result cited is $17.6$ zJ. The claim is obtained directly from single-shot time traces processed with a matched filter, not merely inferred from steady-state noise-equivalent-power measurements. If correct, the same sensor architecture with a graphene absorber is a route toward real-time calorimetric detection of single microwave photons near 10 GHz.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the SNS radiation sensor: a micron-long AuPd normal-metal nanowire that absorbs the microwave pulse and acts as the thermal mass, capacitively shunted to a series array of SNS Josephson junctions whose inductance changes with electron temperature, forming an LC oscillator whose resonance frequency shifts with absorbed power. The argument is carried by the matched filter, which weights each single-shot trace's Fourier components by the inverse noise power spectral density and a template of the pulse response, improving the signal-to-noise ratio by more than 30 percent relative to simple averaging, and by the nonlinear calibration curve that converts arbitrary filtered-signal units into energy units under the Lorentzian reflection model.

What would settle it

Measure the same pulse sequence with an independent, traceable calibration of the power delivered to the chip, and check whether the signal-to-FWHM ratio at the nominal $0.95$ zJ input remains above unity; if the true on-chip energy is even $0.1$ dB lower than assumed, the claimed bound fails. The known Poisson variance of coherent input states could be used in the same test to check that the extracted energy scale matches the calibrated scale.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that an SNS junction thermometer coupled to a metallic nanowire absorber measures $1$-$\mu$s, $8.4$ GHz microwave pulses with a FWHM energy resolution finer than $(0.95 \pm 0.02)$ zJ $= (5.9 \pm 0.12)$ meV, corresponding to about $171 \pm 4$ photons. The authors record 1000 un-averaged traces per pulse energy, apply a matched filter whose template is a double-exponential fit to averaged high-energy pulses, fit the empirical cumulative distribution functions to error functions, and convert the fitted signal spread into energy units through a Lorentzian calibration model. At the lowest applied pulse energy, $0.95$ zJ, the signal-to-FWHM ratio is $1.17 \pm 0.05$, so the resolution must be finer than that input energy. Interpolating the converted standard deviations gives an estimated resolution of $(0.83 \pm 0.04)$ zJ, consistent with the $1.03$ zJ estimate obtained from the independently measured noise equivalent power.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the separately calibrated input-line attenuation of $119.24 \pm 0.1$ dB is unchanged during the main experiment, because every on-chip pulse energy, including the $0.95$ zJ input, is derived from that calibration; a secondary premise is that the nonlinear model used to convert signal spread into energy units is correct, which matters more for the interpolated $0.83$ zJ estimate than for the direct bound.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, this is the first direct calorimetric measurement with sub-zeptojoule FWHM energy resolution, roughly an order of magnitude below the previous best calorimeter's $17.6$ zJ.
  • The matched-filter processing transfers directly to other slow thermal detectors, improving their single-shot energy resolution without any change in hardware.
  • Because the dominant noise is in the amplification chain, adding a quantum-limited parametric amplifier at the millikelvin stage should further improve the same device's resolution.
  • Combining this readout with a lower-heat-capacity graphene absorber, as the authors argue, gives a concrete route toward real-time calorimetric detection of single microwave photons in the 10 GHz range.
  • The demonstrated dynamic range is only a few zeptojoules, but the authors point out that a second probe tone or a frequency comb could extend it.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the input-line attenuation calibration were in error by more than its stated $0.1$ dB, the $0.95$ zJ bound would shift proportionally; an independent, traceable power calibration would settle this.
  • Because the input pulses are coherent states with known Poisson photon statistics, the measured width-versus-energy curve could serve as an internal cross-check of the energy calibration, a check the paper does not perform.
  • The interpolated $0.83$ zJ estimate depends on the nonlinear Lorentzian model; a direct measurement at a pulse energy where the signal-to-FWHM ratio is near unity would confirm or refute that interpolation.
  • The same calorimetric readout with matched filtering could serve as an energy-resolving discriminator of superconducting qubit states, extending the authors' earlier thermal-detector readout work.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports calorimetric detection of 1-µs, 8.4 GHz microwave pulses with an SNS-based sensor, claiming a FWHM energy resolution finer than 0.95 zJ at 20 mK. The authors characterize the noise equivalent power in bolometric mode, then collect 1000 single-shot traces per pulse energy between 0.95 and 3.8 zJ, apply a matched filter built from a double-exponential template, fit empirical CDFs to extract signal means and standard deviations, and convert the signal spread into energy units using an inverse-Lorentzian calibration curve. The central claim is that the signal-to-FWHM ratio at 0.95 zJ is 1.17 ± 0.05, implying sub-zeptojoule resolution; interpolation of the data gives an estimated resolution of 0.83 ± 0.04 zJ.

Significance. If the central claim survives scrutiny, this is a substantial advance: it would be the first direct calorimetric measurement with sub-zeptojoule FWHM resolution, roughly an order of magnitude better than the previous best calorimeter (17.6 zJ for a Ti TES). The paper also ships reproducible data and code on Zenodo, uses matched filtering to improve the signal-to-noise ratio, and provides a transparent accounting of statistical uncertainties. The main reservation is the variance-transformation error discussed below, which directly affects the quoted signal-to-FWHM ratio and therefore the headline resolution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods, Eq. (12)] Equation (12) is an incorrect second-order variance transform. Expanding the printed expression gives σ_E^2 = σ_S^2 [E'(μ_S)]^2 − (σ_S^4/4)[E''(μ_S)]^2. For a Gaussian signal transformed by E(s), the correct second-order delta method gives σ_E^2 = σ_S^2 [E'(μ_S)]^2 + (σ_S^4/2)[E''(μ_S)]^2 (plus higher-order terms). The printed formula even yields a negative variance for a simple quadratic transformation Y = X^2 with X ∼ N(0,σ^2), so the sign error is unambiguous. Because the FWHM W_E in Fig. 4b and the interpolated energy resolution in Extended Data Fig. 3 are computed directly from σ_E via Eq. (12), the negative σ_S^4 term biases σ_E low and inflates the signal-to-FWHM ratio. At the 0.95 zJ point, σ_S/μ_S ≈ 0.36, so σ_S^4 is not negligible, and the inverse-Lorentzian calibration curve E(s) has nonzero curvature. The authors must recompute σ_E, W_E, and the signal-to-FWHM ratio with the correct transform and determine whether the value 1.17 remains above unity. The uncertainty propagation in Eqs. (13)–(16) inherits the same error and should be revised accordingly.
  2. [Methods, total input line attenuation] The absolute energy scale of every pulse, including the central 0.95 zJ point, rests on the total input line attenuation of 119.24 ± 0.1 dB, calibrated in a separate thermal cycle using a different bolometer. The statement 'We consider the change in line attenuation between the thermal cycles of the cryostat to be negligible' is an assumption, not a measurement. Since a change of only 0.1 dB shifts the pulse energy by about 2.3%, and a larger drift would directly affect the claimed bound, the authors should provide support for this assumption, for example a stability check with a known source in the same cycle or a sensitivity analysis of the conclusion to the attenuation value.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Results] The abstract says 'corresponding to 170 photons at 8.4 GHz' while the Results section quotes '171 ± 4' for the 0.95 zJ pulse and '150 ± 7' for the interpolated 0.83 zJ value; the numbers should be harmonized.
  2. [Methods, Eq. (6)] The presentation of Eq. (6) is difficult to parse because the integrand appears as a fraction with '4' over 'NEP^2(f)'. Please clarify whether the intended formula is ∫ 4/NEP^2(f) df or ∫ 4 NEP^2(f) df, and add a brief dimensional check.
  3. [Fig. 4b] The figure caption states that error bars denote one-standard-deviation confidence intervals, but it is not stated whether the 0.1 dB line-attenuation uncertainty is included in these intervals; please state this explicitly.
  4. [Methods, matched-filter template] The template K(t) is extracted from averaged 3.8 zJ pulses, and the text asserts that the nonlinearity 'does not significantly affect' the filtering for the pulse energies considered, but no quantitative comparison is given; a short analysis of how the filtered SNR changes when the template is derived at a lower energy would strengthen the presentation.
  5. [Results and analysis] The sentence 'we find that the noise in the output signal is primarily arising from the amplification chain' is important for the interpretation but is supported only qualitatively; consider showing the measured noise PSD relative to the expected amplifier noise floor in the main text or Extended Data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the zeptojoule energy-resolution claim is obtained from measured single-shot trace distributions, with the NEP estimate used only as a post-hoc comparison, and the in-sample calibration curve does not force the width result.

full rationale

The derivation of the headline energy resolution is not circular. The value 0.95 zJ and the signal-to-FWHM ratio 1.17 are computed from the width of the empirical single-shot signal distribution at the lowest calibrated pulse energy; the NEP-based estimate of 1.03 zJ is not inserted into this calculation but is quoted afterward for comparison. Equation (11) is fitted to the mean signals, so it makes the energy scale consistent with the calibrated input energies, but the width sigma_S comes from independent error-function fits to the cumulative distributions and is not forced by the fit of E(s). The interpolated 0.83 zJ value is explicitly presented as an interpolation, not as a prediction, and it is cross-checked rather than generated by the NEP formula. The input-line attenuation calibration is an external traceable procedure from prior work using a separate bolometer and a different cool-down; assuming stability between cool-downs is an uncertainty rather than a circular input. The self-citations are contextual (device provenance, template shape, calibration method) and none is used as a uniqueness argument or to prohibit alternatives. The possible sign issue in Eq. (12) is a methodological or correctness concern about the variance transform, not a case where the result is an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central 0.95 zJ claim is anchored to an independently calibrated input-line attenuation and to a measured spread of 1000 matched-filter outputs at 0.95 zJ. The fitted Lorentzian calibration parameters and the quadratic sigma_s interpolation influence the converted energy units and the interpolated 0.83 zJ estimate, but they are disclosed as fits rather than hidden constraints. The double-exponential matched-filter template is an empirical model with unknown microscopic origin. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Lorentzian calibration parameters tilde a, tilde gamma, tilde Delta f (Eq. 11) = not quoted numerically in text
    Fitted to the mean matched-filter signal versus calibrated pulse energy to define the calibration curve E(s) that converts signal spread into energy units. The converted FWHM resolution depends on the slope E'(s).
  • Quadratic sigma_s interpolation coefficients a0, a1, a2 = not quoted; fit to measured sigma_s(E)
    Used to interpolate the energy resolution between measured pulse energies and to estimate 0.83 ± 0.04 zJ. Not required for the direct 0.95 zJ bound.
  • Matched-filter template parameters tau1, tau2, a2/a1 (Eq. 8) = tau1 approximately 18 us, tau2 approximately 150 us, a2/a1 approximately 1.5
    Fit to the ensemble-averaged response to 3.8 zJ pulses; the template is applied to all pulse energies. Template fidelity affects the measured width, but a suboptimal template would worsen rather than artificially improve the resolution.
  • Noise PSD model parameters A and B (S_n(f) = A/f + B) = not quoted
    Used to weight the matched filter. The authors state that the noise-model choice is not scientifically constraining; using the raw PSD instead changes the resolution by about 4 percent.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Lorentzian tank-circuit reflection model (Methods Eq. 1) and linear resonance shift fr = fr,0 - alpha P_MW (Eq. 2)
    Basis of the calibration curve E(s); taken from circuit-QED and prior bolometer work (Refs. 45 and 43), not derived in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Double-exponential decay of the calorimetric signal (Eq. 8) with tau1 near 18 us and tau2 near 150 us
    The text states that the exact physical origin of the double-exponential behavior is unknown, but that it was reported in earlier similar devices. This template partly shapes the measured resolution.
  • domain assumption The calorimetric signal is directly proportional to pulse energy over the measured range, and the template extracted at 3.8 zJ is valid at 0.95 zJ
    Methods states the signal is assumed to be directly proportional to pulse energy. Deviations are acknowledged but stated not to affect the considered energies significantly.
  • domain assumption Noise in the matched-filter output is Gaussian, so CDFs can be fit with an error function (Eq. 10)
    Empirically supported by the fits shown in Fig. 4a; used to extract means and standard deviations.
  • domain assumption The 119.24 ± 0.1 dB input-line attenuation, calibrated in a separate thermal cycle with a different bolometer, is unchanged during the main experiment
    The pulse energies at the chip, including the 0.95 zJ bound, depend on this calibration.
  • standard math Variance transformation formula (Eq. 12) is the correct delta-method approximation for converting signal-unit standard deviations to energy units
    Quoted from Ref. 50; standard propagation of variance through a nonlinear function.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Zeptojoule Calorimetry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3FIUJ7WY

@misc{pith2026241214079,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Zeptojoule Calorimetry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3FIUJ7WY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14079}
}
abstract

The measurement of energy is a fundamental tool used, for example, in exploring the early universe, characterizing particle decay processes, as well as in quantum technology and computing. Some of the most sensitive energy detectors are thermal, i.e., bolometers and calorimeters, which operate by absorbing incoming energy, converting it into heat, and reading out the resulting temperature change electrically using a thermometer. Extremely sensitive calorimeters, including transition edge sensors, magnetic microcalorimeters and devices based on 2D conductors such as graphene, have been shown to reach impressive energy resolutions of 17.6 zJ. Very recently superconductor--normal-conductor--superconductor (SNS) radiation sensors with metallic and graphene absorbers have resulted in predictions of full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) energy resolutions of 0.75 zJ and 0.05 zJ = 71 GHz$\times h$, respectively, where $h$ is the Planck constant. However, since these estimates are only mathematically extracted from steady-state noise and responsivity measurements, no calorimetry reaching single-zeptojoule energy resolution or beyond has been demonstrated. Here, we use a metallic SNS sensor to measure the energy of 1-$\mu$s-long 8.4-GHz microwave pulses with a FWHM energy resolution finer than (0.95 $\pm$ 0.02) zJ = (5.9 $\pm$ 0.12) meV, corresponding to 170 photons at 8.4 GHz. The techniques of this work, combined with graphene-based sensors, provide a promising path to real-time calorimetric detection of single photons in the 10 GHz range. Such a device has potential in operating as an accurate measurement device of quantum states such as those of superconducting qubits, or used in fundamental physics explorations including quantum thermodynamics, and the search for axions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Computed tomography of propagating microwave photons

    quant-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A superconducting bolometer with homodyne interference performs amplification-free Wigner function tomography of propagating microwave photons, demonstrated on Gaussian states at the single-photon level.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J., Barreiro, R

    Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Bac- cigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., Basak, S., Benabed, K., Bernard, J.-P., Bersanelli, M., Bielewicz, P., Bock, J. J., Bond, J. R., Borrill, J., Bouchet, F. R., Boulanger, F., Bucher, M., Burigana, C., Butler, R. C., Calabrese, E., Cardoso,...

    2020

  2. [2]

    Wiedner, M.C., Aalto, S., Armus, L., Bergin, E., Birkby, J., Bradford, C.M., Burgarella, D., Caselli, P., Charmandaris, V., Cooray, A., De Beck, E., Desert, J.M., Gerin, M., Goicoechea, J., Griffin, M., Hartogh, P., Helmich, F., Hoger- heijde, M., Hunt, L., Karska, A., Kral, Q., Leisawitz, D., Melnick, G., Meixner, M., Matsuura, M., Milam, S., Pearson, C....

    work page

  3. [3]

    Journal of Low Temperature Physics 199(1), 441–450 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-019-02278-4

    Ranitzsch, P.C.-O., Arnold, D., Beyer, J., Bockhorn, L., Bonaparte, J.J., Enss, C., Kossert, K., Kempf, S., Loidl, M., Mariam, R., N¨ ahle, O.J., Paulsen, M., Rodrigues, M., Wegner, M.: MetroMMC: Electron-Capture Spectrometry with Cryogenic Calorimeters for Science and Technology. Journal of Low Temperature Physics 199(1), 441–450 (2020) https://doi.org/1...

    work page doi:10.1007/s10909-019-02278-4 2020

  4. [4]

    The European Physical Journal Plus 138(5), 445 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03946-x 19

    Pagnanini, L., Benato, G., Carniti, P., Celi, E., Chiesa, D., Corbett, J., Dafinei, I., Di Domizio, S., Di Stefano, P., Ghislandi, S., Gotti, C., Helis, D.L., Knobel, R., Kostensalo, J., Kotila, J., Nagorny, S., Pessina, G., Pirro, S., Pozzi, S., Puiu, A., Quitadamo, S., Sisti, M., Suhonen, J., Kuznetsov, S., The ACCESS Collaboration: Array of cryogenic c...

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Communications Physics2(1), 1–6 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-019-0195-8

    Crain, S., Cahall, C., Vrijsen, G., Wollman, E.E., Shaw, M.D., Verma, V.B., Nam, S.W., Kim, J.: High-speed low-crosstalk detection of a 171Yb+ qubit using superconducting nanowire single photon detectors. Communications Physics2(1), 1–6 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-019-0195-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-019-0195-8 2019

  6. [6]

    Nature Physics 16(3), 257–267 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0797-9

    Clerk, A.A., Lehnert, K.W., Bertet, P., Petta, J.R., Nakamura, Y.: Hybrid quantum systems with circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature Physics 16(3), 257–267 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0797-9

    doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0797-9 2020

  7. [7]

    Quantum Science and Technology 8(2), 023001 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/acc4af

    Casariego, M., Cruzeiro, E.Z., Gherardini, S., Gonzalez-Raya, T., Andr´ e, R., Fraz˜ ao, G., Catto, G., M¨ ott¨ onen, M., Datta, D., Viisanen, K., Govenius, J., Prun- nila, M., Tuominen, K., Reichert, M., Renger, M., Fedorov, K.G., Deppe, F., Vliet, H., Matthews, A.J., Fern´ andez, Y., Assouly, R., Dassonneville, R., Huard, B., Sanz, M., Omar, Y.: Propaga...

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Nature Physics 20(9), 1454–1460 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02539-4

    Chou, K.S., Shemma, T., McCarrick, H., Chien, T.-C., Teoh, J.D., Winkel, P., Anderson, A., Chen, J., Curtis, J.C., de Graaf, S.J., Garmon, J.W.O., Gudlewski, B., Kalfus, W.D., Keen, T., Khedkar, N., Lei, C.U., Liu, G., Lu, P., Lu, Y., Maiti, A., Mastalli-Kelly, L., Mehta, N., Mundhada, S.O., Narla, A., Noh, T., Tsunoda, T., Xue, S.H., Yuan, J.O., Frunzio,...

    2024

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    In: Enss, C

    McCammon, D.: Thermal Equilibrium Calorimeters – An Introduction. In: Enss, C. (ed.) Cryogenic Particle Detection, pp. 1–34. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/10933596 1

    2005 doi

  2. [10]

    Superconductor Science and Technology 28(8), 084003 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/28/8/084003

    Ullom, J.N., Bennett, D.A.: Review of superconducting transition-edge sensors for x-ray and gamma-ray spectroscopy. Superconductor Science and Technology 28(8), 084003 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/28/8/084003

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    Instruments 8(4), 47 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments8040047

    De Lucia, M., Dal Bo, P., Di Giorgi, E., Lari, T., Puglia, C., Paolucci, F.: Transition Edge Sensors: Physics and Applications. Instruments 8(4), 47 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments8040047

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Journal of Low Temperature Physics 193(3), 365–379 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-018-1891-6

    Kempf, S., Fleischmann, A., Gastaldo, L., Enss, C.: Physics and Applications of Metallic Magnetic Calorimeters. Journal of Low Temperature Physics 193(3), 365–379 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-018-1891-6

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    The European Physical Journal Plus 138(6), 518 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04068-0

    Kim, H., Kim, Y.-H., Woo, K.-R.: Cryogenic particle detection based on magnetic microcalorimeters for rare event searches. The European Physical Journal Plus 138(6), 518 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04068-0

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    Small, 2401151 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202401151

    Samaha, A.-C., Doumani, J., Kritzell, T.E., Xu, H., Baydin, A., Ajayan, 20 P.M., Tahchi, M.E., Kono, J.: Graphene Terahertz Devices for Sensing and Communication. Small, 2401151 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202401151

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Science Advances 10(38), 3725 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1126/ sciadv.adp3725

    Di Battista, G., Fong, K.C., D ´ ıez-Carl´ on, A., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Efetov, D.K.: Infrared single-photon detection with superconducting magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Science Advances 10(38), 3725 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1126/ sciadv.adp3725

    2024

  8. [16]

    48550/arXiv.2410.22433

    Huang, B., Arnault, E.G., Jung, W., Fried, C., Russell, B.J., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T., Henriksen, E.A., Englund, D., Lee, G.-H., Fong, K.C.: Graphene calorimetric single-photon detector (arXiv:2410.22433) (2024) https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2410.22433

    2024 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    Applied Physics Letters 101(5), 052601 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4739839

    Karasik, B.S., Pereverzev, S.V., Soibel, A., Santavicca, D.F., Prober, D.E., Olaya, D., Gershenson, M.E.: Energy-resolved detection of single infrared photons with λ = 8µm using a superconducting microbolometer. Applied Physics Letters 101(5), 052601 (2012) https://doi.org/10....

    2012 doi

  10. [18]

    Kokkoniemi, R., Govenius, J., Vesterinen, V., Lake, R.E., Gunyho, A.M., Tan, K.Y., Lehtinen, J., Prunnila, M., Hassel, J., Saira, O., M¨ ott¨ onen, M.: Nanobolometer with ultralow noise equivalent power. Commun. Phys. 2, 124 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-019-0225-6

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    Nature 586(7827), 47–51 (2020) https://doi.org/10

    Kokkoniemi, R., Girard, J.-P., Hazra, D., Laitinen, A., Govenius, J., Lake, R.E., Sallinen, I., Vesterinen, V., Partanen, M., Tan, J.Y., Chan, K.W., Tan, K.Y., Hakonen, P., M¨ ott¨ onen, M.: Bolometer operating at the threshold for circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature 586(7...

    2020

  12. [20]

    Nature Electronics7(4), 288–298 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-024-01147-7

    Gunyh´ o, A.M., Kundu, S., Ma, J., Liu, W., Niemel¨ a, S., Catto, G., Vadimov, V., Vesterinen, V., Singh, P., Chen, Q., M¨ ott¨ onen, M.: Single-shot readout of a superconducting qubit using a thermal detector. Nature Electronics7(4), 288–298 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41...

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Pekola, J.P.: Towards quantum thermodynamics in electronic circuits. Nat. Phys. 11, 118–123 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3169

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    A VS Quantum Science 4(2), 027101 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0083192

    Myers, N.M., Abah, O., Deffner, S.: Quantum thermodynamic devices: From the- oretical proposals to experimental reality. A VS Quantum Science 4(2), 027101 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0083192

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    Physics of the Dark Universe 12, 37–44 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2016.01.003

    Capparelli, L.M., Cavoto, G., Ferretti, J., Giazotto, F., Polosa, A.D., Spagnolo, P.: Axion-like particle searches with sub-thz photons. Physics of the Dark Universe 12, 37–44 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2016.01.003

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    npj Quantum Information 8(1), 1–7 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41534-022-00569-5

    Pankratov, A.L., Revin, L.S., Gordeeva, A.V., Yablokov, A.A., Kuzmin, L.S., Il’ichev, E.: Towards a microwave single-photon counter for searching 21 axions. npj Quantum Information 8(1), 1–7 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41534-022-00569-5

    2022

  17. [25]

    Inomata, K., Lin, Z., Koshino, K., Oliver, W.D., Tsai, J.S., Yamamoto, T., Naka- mura, Y.: Single microwave-photon detector using an artificial Λ-type three-level system. Nat. Commun. 7, 12303 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12303

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    Physical Review Applied 21(1) (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.014043

    Balembois, L.: Cyclically Operated Microwave Single-Photon Counter with Sen- sitivity of 10−22zW/ √ Hz. Physical Review Applied 21(1) (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.014043

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    Chen, Y.-F., Hover, D., Sendelbach, S., Maurer, L., Merkel, S.T., Pritchett, E.J., Wilhelm, F.K., McDermott, R.: Microwave photon counter based on Joseph- son junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 217401 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.107.217401

    2011

  20. [28]

    Physical Review Applied 16(1), 014025 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.014025

    Golubev, D.S., Il’ichev, E.V., Kuzmin, L.S.: Single-Photon Detection with a Josephson Junction Coupled to a Resonator. Physical Review Applied 16(1), 014025 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.014025

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    Pankratov, A.L., Gordeeva, A.V., Chiginev, A.V., Revin, L.S., Blagodatkin, A.V., Crescini, N., Kuzmin, L.S.: Observation of thermal microwave photons with a Josephson junction detector (arXiv:2404.10434) (2024) https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2404.10434

    2024 doi arXiv

  22. [30]

    PRX Quantum 5(2), 020342 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020342

    Petrovnin, K., Wang, J., Perelshtein, M., Hakonen, P., Paraoanu, G.S.: Microwave Photon Detection at Parametric Criticality. PRX Quantum 5(2), 020342 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020342

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    AIP Conf

    Mazin, B.A.: Microwave kinetic inductance detectors: The first decade. AIP Conf. Proc. 1185, 135–143 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3292300

    2009 doi

  24. [32]

    Applied Sciences 11(6), 2671 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062671

    Ulbricht, G., De Lucia, M., Baldwin, E.: Applications for Microwave Kinetic Induction Detectors in Advanced Instrumentation. Applied Sciences 11(6), 2671 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062671

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    Nanophotonics 9(9), 2673–2692 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1515/ nanoph-2020-0186

    You, L.: Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors for quantum information. Nanophotonics 9(9), 2673–2692 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1515/ nanoph-2020-0186

    2020

  26. [34]

    Applied Physics Letters 118(19), 190502 (2021) https://doi.org/10

    Esmaeil Zadeh, I., Chang, J., Los, J.W.N., Gyger, S., Elshaari, A.W., Stein- hauer, S., Dorenbos, S.N., Zwiller, V.: Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: A perspective on evolution, state-of-the-art, future developments, and applications. Applied Physics Letters 1...

    2021

  27. [35]

    Echternach, P., Pepper, B., Reck, T., Bradford, C.: Single photon detection of 1.5 22 THz radiation with the quantum capacitance detector. Nat. Astron. 2(1), 90–97 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-017-0294-y

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 7(1), 011003 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS

    Echternach, P.M., Beyer, A.D., Bradford, C.M.: Large array of low-frequency readout quantum capacitance detectors. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 7(1), 011003 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS. 7.1.011003

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Physical Review X 14(4), 041005 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.041005

    Day, P.K., Cothard, N.F., Albert, C., Foote, L., Kane, E., Eom, B.H., Basu Thakur, R., Janssen, R.M.J., Beyer, A., Echternach, P.M., van Berkel, S., Hailey-Dunsheath, S., Stevenson, T.R., Dabironezare, S., Baselmans, J.J.A., Glenn, J., Bradford, C.M., Leduc, H.G.: A 25-microme...

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Karimi, B., Brange, F., Samuelsson, P., Pekola, J.P.: Reaching the ultimate energy resolution of a quantum detector. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 1–6 (2020) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-019-14247-2

    2020 doi

  31. [39]

    Physical Review Applied 14(3), 034055 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.14.034055

    Paolucci, F., Ligato, N., Buccheri, V., Germanese, G., Virtanen, P., Giazotto, F.: Hypersensitive Tunable Josephson Escape Sensor for Gigahertz Astron- omy. Physical Review Applied 14(3), 034055 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.14.034055

    2020

  32. [40]

    Nature 586(7827), 42–46 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2752-4

    Lee, G.-H., Efetov, D.K., Jung, W., Ranzani, L., Walsh, E.D., Ohki, T.A., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K., Kim, P., Englund, D., Fong, K.C.: Graphene- based Josephson junction microwave bolometer. Nature 586(7827), 42–46 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2752-4

    2020 doi

  33. [42]

    Govenius, J., Lake, R.E., Tan, K.Y., M¨ ott¨ onen, M.: Detection of zeptojoule microwave pulses using electrothermal feedback in proximity-induced Joseph- son junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 030802 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.117.030802

    2016

  34. [43]

    48550/arXiv.2407.05147

    Ker¨ anen, A., Chen, Q.-M., Gunyh´ o, A., Singh, P., Ma, J., Vesterinen, V., Govenius, J., M¨ ott¨ onen, M.: Measurement of microwave photon correlations at millikelvin with a thermal detector (arXiv:2407.05147) (2024) https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2407.05147

    2024 doi arXiv

  35. [44]

    Review of Scientific Instruments 94(5), 054710 (2023) https: 23 //doi.org/10.1063/5.0143761

    Girard, J.-P., Lake, R.E., Liu, W., Kokkoniemi, R., Visakorpi, E., Govenius, J., M¨ ott¨ onen, M.: Cryogenic sensor enabling broad-band and traceable power measurements. Review of Scientific Instruments 94(5), 054710 (2023) https: 23 //doi.org/10.1063/5.0143761

    2023 doi

  36. [45]

    Chen, Q.-M., Partanen, M., Fesquet, F., Honasoge, K.E., Kronowetter, F., Nojiri, Y., Renger, M., Fedorov, K.G., Marx, A., Deppe, F., Gross, R.: Scattering coefficients of superconducting microwave resonators. II. System-bath approach. Physical Review B 106(21), 214506 (2022) h...

    2022 doi

  37. [46]

    Proakis, J.G., Manolakis, D.G.: Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications, p. 910. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1996)

    1996

  38. [47]

    Nature Communications 5(1), 3130 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4130

    de Visser, P.J., Baselmans, J.J.A., Bueno, J., Llombart, N., Klapwijk, T.M.: Fluc- tuations in the electron system of a superconductor exposed to a photon flux. Nature Communications 5(1), 3130 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4130

    2014 doi

  39. [48]

    Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1962)

    Wainstein, L.A., Zubakov, V.D.: Extraction of Signals from Noise. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1962)

    1962

  40. [49]

    Physical Review Applied 3(1), 014007 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.3.014007

    Gasparinetti, S., Viisanen, K.L., Saira, O.P., Faivre, T., Arzeo, M., Meschke, M., Pekola, J.P.: Fast electron thermometry for ultrasensitive calorimetric detec- tion. Physical Review Applied 3(1), 014007 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevApplied.3.014007

    2015

  41. [50]

    Benaroya, H., Han, S.M.: Probability Models in Engineering And Science, p. 166. Taylor & Francis, United Kingdom (2005) Acknowledgements We thank Vasilii Vadimov and Aarne Ker¨ anen for useful discussions. We acknowl- edge the provision of facilities and technical support by A...

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.