Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 69 references

Revisiting Near-Infrared Features of Kilonovae: The Importance of Gadolinium

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that doubly ionized gadolinium, not lanthanum alone, shapes the kilonova absorption feature at 12,000 Å.

desk verdict Gd III is a credible third NIR species in kilonova spectra, though the key gf-value is semi-empirical and the abstract's 'confirm' oversells what the body shows. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14597 v1 pith:4ZDUPIH4 submitted 2024-12-19 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRphysics.atom-ph

Salma Rahmouni , Masaomi Tanaka , Nanae Domoto , Daiji Kato , Kenta Hotokezaka , Wako Aoki , Teruyuki Hirano , Takayuki Kotani
show 2 more authors
Masayuki Kuzuhara Motohide Tamura
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRphysics.atom-ph
keywords kilonovar-processnucleosynthesisnear-infraredspectroscopyGdIIIatomicdataradiativetransferlineidentificationAT2017gfo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Dying moments of neutron star mergers produce kilonovae, and the near-infrared spectrum of the 2017 event AT2017gfo contains absorption features whose elemental origins are still debated. This paper argues that doubly ionized gadolinium (Gd III) is a strong, previously overlooked contributor to these features. The authors build a line list of near-infrared transitions from experimentally measured energy levels, find that lanthanides and actinides dominate, and single out the Gd III line at 14,336 Å as having an optical depth comparable to the already known Ce III lines. Adding Gd III to radiative transfer simulations deepens the ~12,000 Å absorption previously attributed to La III and shifts its center by about 500 Å at 1.5 days after the merger. The paper concludes that a third NIR species has been identified, and that space-based time-series observations of future kilonovae can confirm it.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Gd III 14,336 Å line, an electric-dipole transition between two low-lying experimentally calibrated energy levels ($4f^8\,{}^7F_6$ at $0.295$ eV and $4f^7({}^8S^\circ)\,5d\,{}^7D^\circ_5$ at $1.160$ eV) with an empirically determined oscillator strength $\log gf = -1.521$. Its strength is evaluated with the Sobolev optical depth formula under LTE, which shows it rivals the known Ce III lines, and it is then inserted into a Monte Carlo radiative transfer calculation using the expansion opacity formalism, where Gd III data are treated as accurate transitions on a fine wavelength grid. The atomic-structure justification — a half-filled 4f subshell plus a single outer 5d electron lowers the energy levels — explains why this mid-periodic-table element behaves like the left-side elements that dominate kilonova spectra.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement or high-precision relativistic atomic-structure calculation of the Gd III 14,336 Å oscillator strength that finds a value much lower than $\log gf \approx -1.5$ (for example, near the theoretical average of about $10^{-5.7}$) would eliminate the predicted contribution, because the Sobolev optical depth is linear in gf. Alternatively, a space-based time-series spectrum of a future kilonova taken between 1.5 and 3.5 days after the merger that shows the 12,000 Å feature neither deepening nor shifting by about 500 Å at early times would falsify the claim as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Through a systematic search of allowed near-infrared transitions built from experimentally measured energy levels (NIST ASD and the SCASA actinide database) for singly and doubly ionized elements with atomic numbers 30–99, the authors confirm that lanthanides and actinides produce the strongest NIR absorption, and identify Gd III — with its ground configuration $[\mathrm{Xe}]\,4f^7\,5d$ and a half-filled 4f shell — as the most promising species after La III and Ce III. The 14,336 Å transition ($4f^8\,{}^7F_6 \rightarrow 4f^7({}^8S^\circ)\,5d\,{}^7D^\circ_5$) carries an empirically determined oscillator strength $\log gf = -1.521$ from the VALD database, giving a Sobolev optical depth comparable to the strongest Ce III lines. The same line, plus the 17,479 Å line, appears in the NIR spectrum of the chemically peculiar star HR 465, reproduced with synthetic spectra at $[\mathrm{Gd/H}] = 4.0$. Radiative transfer models of a $0.03\,M_\odot$ ejecta show that including Gd III makes the ~12,000 Å feature broader and shifts its center by ~500 Å at 1.5 days; by 3.5 days the effect fades because Gd II has a higher ionization energy (12.1 eV) than La II (11.2 eV), so Gd recombines first. The paper concludes that, given current atomic data, La III, Ce III, and Gd III are the elements most likely to explain the kilonova NIR features.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the empirically determined oscillator strength of the Gd III 14,336 Å line ($\log gf = -1.521$), a semi-empirical calculation whose provenance includes a private communication, is close to the true transition probability; if it is significantly overestimated, the predicted optical depth, the HR 465 match, and the 500 Å spectral shift all weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Gd III, specifically the 14,336 Å line, contributes to the kilonova absorption feature at ~12,000 Å previously attributed to La III, making it a blend whose center shifts by about 500 Å at 1.5 days.
  • The relative timing of recombination — Gd III fades by about 3.5 days while La III persists — makes the time evolution of the 12,000 Å feature a diagnostic of the ionization state and of the presence of gadolinium.
  • The 14,336 Å and 17,479 Å Gd III lines detected in HR 465 provide an astrophysical laboratory confirmation that these transitions can form in environments with lanthanide enhancement similar to kilonovae.
  • Future space-based time-series NIR spectra of a new nearby kilonova can test the prediction, because the feature sits in a telluric absorption region for ground-based telescopes.
  • Constraining the Gd/La ratio from the shifted feature would test r-process abundance patterns predicted by neutron star merger simulations, which give similar mass fractions across lanthanides.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: If non-LTE effects keep Gd doubly ionized longer than the LTE recombination time, the 12,000 Å feature may stay broad and shifted past 3.5 days; the paper itself notes that a non-LTE treatment is needed, so the feature's fade timescale becomes a test of non-thermal ionization in the ejecta.
  • Editorial inference: The same experimentally calibrated energy-level search, applied with a 2 eV lower-level threshold, could be extended to optical and ultraviolet wavelengths to identify other blend contributors, since the method already flags actinides such as Th III and U III as candidates awaiting reliable oscillator strengths.
  • Editorial inference: A direct laboratory measurement of the Gd III 14,336 Å oscillator strength would settle whether the empirical value ($\log gf = -1.521$) is accurate; if the true value is much lower, the predicted spectral shift disappears.
  • Editorial inference: The HR 465 spectrum, which already exhibits Ce III and Sr II lines, can be used to predict the strengths of weaker Gd III transitions that the paper did not model, providing a way to extend the Gd III line list for future kilonova analyses.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a list of candidate near-infrared (NIR) transitions for singly and doubly ionized heavy elements (Z=30-103) using experimentally calibrated energy levels from NIST ASD and SCASA, applying a 2 eV lower-level energy threshold. It finds that lanthanides and actinides dominate the strong NIR transitions, and focuses on Gd III because of its low-lying 5d ground-type configuration. The authors report the detection of two Gd III lines (14,336 Å and 17,479 Å) in the chemically peculiar star HR 465 by comparing the observed spectrum with synthesized spectra, and they use a Monte Carlo radiative transfer code to argue that the Gd III 14,336 Å line contributes to the ~12,000 Å feature of AT2017gfo previously attributed to La III, shifting its center by approximately 500 Å at 1.5 days after the merger. The paper concludes that future space-based time-series observations of kilonova spectra will allow identification of Gd III lines.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper adds Gd III as a third identified NIR species in kilonova spectra and provides a testable prediction: the ~12,000 Å feature should evolve in shape and centroid as Gd recombines earlier than La. The systematic construction of a NIR line list from experimentally calibrated energy levels is a useful resource, and the HR 465 comparison provides an independent astrophysical benchmark that is not used to fit the kilonova feature. The radiative transfer prediction is a genuine forward calculation rather than a fit, which is a strength. However, the confidence in the claim is limited by the unquantified uncertainty in the single semi-empirical oscillator strength that drives the predicted effect.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Table 1, Fig. 4, §4.2] The central claim that Gd III affects the ~12,000 Å feature rests on the VALD gf-value log gf = -1.521 for the 14,336 Å line, which is described as a semi-empirical Cowan-code calculation from a private communication (Ryabtsev 2010) with no documented uncertainty. The Sobolev optical depth comparison in Fig. 4, the blueshifted ticks in Fig. 8, and the approximately 500 Å shift in the synthetic spectra all depend on this single number. Because the HR 465 spectral fit in Sec. 3.3 degenerates between abundance and oscillator strength, it does not independently calibrate this gf-value. I request an explicit uncertainty estimate for the VALD Gd III gf data and a sensitivity test of the simulated 12,000 Å shift for a plausible range of log gf, for example ±0.3–0.5 dex.
  2. [Abstract, §6] The abstract and conclusions state that the radiative transfer simulations confirm that Gd III lines affect the 12,000 Å feature, but the evidence is a synthetic prediction rather than a direct observation of the predicted time evolution. The paper itself notes in Sec. 5 that the feature coincides with the telluric absorption region and that only a single HST epoch is of high quality for AT2017gfo. The word "confirm" overstates the observational support; I recommend softening to "suggest" or "indicate" and explicitly framing the time evolution of the feature as a falsifiable prediction for future observations.
  3. [§3.2, §4.2, Fig. 4] Only 12 of the 26 Gd III transitions listed in Table 1 have empirical gf-values from VALD; the remaining lines are assigned the theoretical average log gf = -5.7, which the authors argue underestimates the true values. The synthetic spectra therefore include an unquantified opacity contribution from these other Gd III lines. Because the conclusion that the 14,336 Å line is the only significant Gd III NIR transition depends on this treatment, I request a sensitivity test using the available VALD gf-values for all lines, or a discussion of how the unknown gf-values could affect the synthetic spectra if they are brighter than the theoretical average.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.1, Eq. (1)] The rendered Sobolev optical depth formula has an ambiguous term "ni,jt"; please clarify the intended subscripts and ensure the standard expression is displayed correctly.
  2. [Table 1] For lines without a VALD gf-value, the table shows a dash and the text states that the theoretical average is used, but this should be stated explicitly in the table caption or notes so that readers know all dashed entries adopt log gf = -5.7 in the calculations.
  3. [§3.3, last paragraph] The statement "we can conclude that the two lines are indeed Gd III lines" is stronger than warranted given the abundance-gf degeneracy in the fit; I suggest "are consistent with" rather than "are indeed."
  4. [Fig. 5, top panels] The telluric-standard comparison is informative, but the telluric labels are dense; please use arrows or a zoomed inset to make the absence of strong telluric absorption at 14,336 Å easier to verify.
  5. [§5, third paragraph] The sentence "The effect of all Gd III lines should be considered for a more thorough investigation" appears to conflict with the earlier conclusion that only the 14,336 Å line is significant; please clarify whether this refers to the need for complete line lists or to a possible cumulative effect from many weak lines.
  6. [Abstract] The phrase "will allow the identification of Gd III lines" is too definite given the telluric and observational caveats discussed in Sec. 5; "may allow" or "could enable" would better match the paper's own assessment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Gd III identification rests on independent atomic data, an external stellar benchmark, and forward radiative transfer with an r-process abundance model.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. Candidate Gd III NIR transitions are selected from experimentally constructed NIST ASD and SCASA energy levels with a 2 eV lower-level threshold, independent of the kilonova spectrum. The Sobolev optical depths are computed using semi-empirical VALD gf-values and Saha ionization, and the resulting strongest lines at 14,336 and 17,479 Å are independently checked against the chemically peculiar star HR 465 using a Turbospectrum synthesis with an abundance taken from Nielsen et al. (2020). The kilonova radiative transfer then adds Gd III lines to the Domoto et al. (2022) hybrid line list and runs a Monte Carlo simulation with the Light r-process abundance model from prior nucleosynthesis calculations, comparing synthetic spectra with and without Gd III. No parameter is fitted to the observed ~12,000 Å feature, and the Gd abundance is not tuned to reproduce that feature; the predicted ~500 Å shift is a forward result of inserting the new atomic data. Citations to Domoto et al. (2022) supply the baseline La III/Ce III attribution and line-list setup, but the Gd III effect is tested by turning those lines on and off in the same setup, so the central claim does not reduce to that citation. The main vulnerability—the single semi-empirical log gf = -1.521 for the 14,336 Å line and its unquantified uncertainty—is a data-accuracy concern, not a circularity, because the prediction is not defined in terms of the target observation.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the completeness of experimental atomic data, the accuracy of semi-empirical gf-values, and the validity of LTE and a specific r-process abundance model. No new particles, forces, or physical entities are introduced; Gd III lines are known atomic transitions.

free parameters (2)
  • Gd abundance [Gd/H] in HR 465 synthetic spectrum = 4.0 dex (within measured range 3.2 to 5.1)
    Used to synthesize HR 465 lines in Section 3.3; chosen as a representative value, not formally fitted, and the uncertainty is not propagated to the line identifications.
  • Lower-level energy threshold for line selection = 2 eV
    Chosen in Section 2.1 based on the Boltzmann depletion argument (about 0.009 of ground-state strength at 5000 K); it is a hand-set cutoff that determines which elements become candidates.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption LTE holds for ionization and excitation in kilonova ejecta at early times
    Invoked in Sections 2.1 and 4.1 to solve the Saha equation and set ionization states; the paper acknowledges in Section 5 that non-LTE effects could change the ionization evolution.
  • domain assumption Energy levels in NIST ASD and SCASA are sufficiently complete and accurate for identifying strong NIR transitions
    The entire candidate selection in Section 2 is based on these databases, and elements with incomplete data are excluded, which could bias the candidate ranking.
  • domain assumption Empirical gf-values in VALD for Gd III are reliable
    The strength of the 14,336 and 17,479 Å lines rests on these values; they are semi-empirical Cowan-code results with limited documentation, including a private communication (Section 3.2).
  • domain assumption The Light r-process abundance model represents kilonova ejecta
    Adopted from Domoto et al. (2021) for the radiative transfer simulations; the predicted spectral shift depends on Gd having a mass fraction similar to La and Ce (Section 4.1, Figure 6).
  • standard math Sobolev and expansion opacity formalisms are appropriate for kilonova radiative transfer
    Used in Equations 1 and 2; standard in the field, but relies on assumptions of large velocity gradients and a smooth density structure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revisiting Near-Infrared Features of Kilonovae: The Importance of Gadolinium." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4ZDUPIH4

@misc{pith2026241214597,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revisiting Near-Infrared Features of Kilonovae: The Importance of Gadolinium},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4ZDUPIH4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14597}
}
abstract

The observation of the kilonova AT2017gfo and investigations of its light curves and spectra confirmed that neutron star mergers are sites of r-process nucleosynthesis. However, the identification of elements responsible for the spectral features is still challenging, particularly at the near-infrared wavelengths. In this study, we systematically searched for all possible near-infrared transitions of heavy elements using experimentally calibrated energy levels. Our analysis reveals that most candidate elements with strong absorption lines are lanthanides (Z=57-71) and actinides (Z=89-103). This is due to their complex structures leading to many low-lying energy levels, which results in strong transitions in the near-infrared range. Domoto et al. (2022) have shown that La III and Ce III can explain the absorption features at $\lambda\sim$ 12,000 - 15,000 A. While our results confirm that these two elements show strong infrared features, we additionally identify Gd III as the next most promising species. Due to its unique atomic structure involving the half-filled 4f and the outer 5d orbitals, Gd III has one of the lowest-lying energy levels, between which relatively strong transitions occur. We also find absorption lines caused by Gd III in the near-infrared spectrum of a chemically peculiar star HR 465, which supports their emergence in kilonova spectra. By performing radiative transfer simulations, we confirm that Gd III lines affect the feature at $\sim$ 12,000 A previously attributed to La III. Future space-based time-series observations of kilonova spectra will allow the identification of Gd III lines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14597 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Average ionization as a function of temperature and density for Ba, Gd, and Au from top to bottom respec￾tively. Colors from purple to orange show the neutral (I), singly (II), doubly (III), and triply (IV) ionized states, in￾dicated by 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The triangle symbol highlights typical conditions of the kilonova ejecta a few days after the merger [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Wavelengths of allowed NIR transitions occurring below an energy threshold of 2 eV for singly ionized states. Elements excluded are shown as gray areas. Lanthanides (57 ≤ Z ≤ 71) and actinides (89 ≤ Z ≤ 103) are highlighted in red and purple, respectively. Right: Same as left panel but for doubly ionized states. 4f 5p65d 2 La III Z=57 Ce III Z=58 Pr III Z=59 4f3 Nd III Z=60 4f4 Gd III Z=64 4f7 5d Tb III Z=65 E… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Energy levels below 2 eV for key doubly ionized candidate lanthanides. The levels for all elements are sourced from the NIST ASD (Kramida et al. 2023), except for Nd III, which is taken from Ding et al. (2024). The red, blue, and green energy levels represent the atomic state where the outer electron is in the 4f, 5d, and 6s orbitals, respectively. Gd III and La III are the only lanthanides with their ground state o… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Sobolev optical depth of Ce III and Gd III lines assuming T = 5000 K and ρ = 10−14 g cm−3 . Gd III lines are plotted using the atomic data shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top: Uncorrected HR 465 flux and the telluric standard star BD+44◦ 493 flux around the 14, 336 ˚A line (left) and the 17, 479 ˚A line (right). The flux of BD+44◦ 493 is corrected for the difference in airmass between the two stars. The telluric absorption features due …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: , where the evolution of Gd ionization fraction throughout the ejecta is plotted for t = 1.5 days after the merger. The element is mainly doubly ionized at the NIR line-forming region, found to be at v ≈ 0.16 c (Domoto et al. 2022). 4.2. Results The top panel of figure…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top: Synthetic spectra of kilonova at 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 days after the merger from top to bottom, calculated with and without Gd III lines. The spectra are vertically shifted by a constant C for better visualization with C = 100 and 30 for t = 1.5 and 2.5 days, respect…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top: La III/Gd III line profile taken by the HST at 4.9 days (Tanvir et al. 2017) and the VLT at 4.5 days (Pian et al. 2017; Smartt et al. 2017) in blue and gray, respectively. Velocity offset is calculated assuming a rest wavelength of 14, 000 ˚A. Transitions causing …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2017a, PhRvL, 119, 161101, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101 —. 2017b, ApJL, 848, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.161101

  2. [2]

    C., Honda, S., et al

    Aoki, W., Beers, T. C., Honda, S., et al. 2022, PASJ, 74, 273, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab123

    doi:10.1093/pasj/psab123 2022

  3. [3]

    A., et al

    Arcavi, I., Hosseinzadeh, G., Howell, D. A., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 64, doi: 10.1038/nature24291

    doi:10.1038/nature24291 2017

  4. [4]

    2013, ApJ, 775, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/18

    Barnes, J., & Kasen, D. 2013, ApJ, 775, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/18

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/1/18 2013

  5. [5]

    1994, Selected Constants Energy Levels and Atomic Spectra of Actinides, [Online]

    Blaise, J., & Wyart, J.-F. 1994, Selected Constants Energy Levels and Atomic Spectra of Actinides, [Online]. Available: http://www.lac.universite-paris-saclay.fr/Data/ Database/

    work page 1994

  6. [6]

    2019, MNRAS, 486, 2075, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz549

    Blanco-Cuaresma, S. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2075, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz549

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz549 2019

  7. [7]

    2014, A&A, 569, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423945 14 Rahmouni et al

    Blanco-Cuaresma, S., Soubiran, C., Heiter, U., & Jofr´ e, P. 2014, A&A, 569, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423945 14 Rahmouni et al. Carvajal Gallego, H., Deprince, J., Berengut, J. C.,

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423945 2014

  8. [8]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 332, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3129 Carvajal Gallego, H., Deprince, J., Maison, L., Palmeri, P., & Quinet, P

    Palmeri, P., & Quinet, P. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 332, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3129 Carvajal Gallego, H., Deprince, J., Maison, L., Palmeri, P., & Quinet, P. 2024, A&A, 685, A91, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347723

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3129 2023

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Castelli, F. 2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, ed. N. Piskunov, W. W. Weiss, & D. F. Gray, 47

    2003

  2. [10]

    Cowan, R. D. 1981, The theory of atomic structure and spectra (Univ of California Press)

    1981

  3. [11]

    2024, HFR Atomic Database and Opacity Tables for Kilonovae from Mons and Brussels

    Deprince, J. 2024, HFR Atomic Database and Opacity Tables for Kilonovae from Mons and Brussels

    2024

  4. [12]

    Universities, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14017953

    doi

  5. [13]

    2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 684, A149

    Ding, M., Ryabtsev, A., Kononov, E., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 684, A149

    2024

  6. [14]

    2022, ApJ, 939, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c36

    Domoto, N., Tanaka, M., Kato, D., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c36

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    2021, ApJ, 913, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf358

    Domoto, N., Tanaka, M., Wanajo, S., & Kawaguchi, K. 2021, ApJ, 913, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf358

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.16998, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.16998

    Hotokezaka, K. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.16998, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.16998

    2024 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 956, 113

    Domoto, N., Lee, J.-J., Tanaka, M., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 956, 113

    2023

  10. [18]

    G., & Pinto, P

    Eastman, R. G., & Pinto, P. A. 1993, ApJ, 412, 731, doi: 10.1086/172957

    1993 doi

  11. [19]

    Eichler, D., Livio, M., Piran, T., & Schramm, D. N. 1989, Nature, 340, 126, doi: 10.1038/340126a0 Fl¨ ors, A., Silva, R. F., Deprince, J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 3083, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2053

    1989 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Fryer, C

    Fontes, C. J., Fryer, C. L., Hungerford, A. L., Wollaeger, R. T., & Korobkin, O. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 4143, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa485

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    J., Fryer, C

    Fontes, C. J., Fryer, C. L., Wollaeger, R. T., Mumpower, M. R., & Sprouse, T. M. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 2862, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2792

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    Freiburghaus, C., Rosswog, S., & Thielemann, F. K. 1999, ApJL, 525, L121, doi: 10.1086/312343

    1999 doi

  15. [23]

    2023, ApJ, 942, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9ce0

    Fujibayashi, S., Kiuchi, K., Wanajo, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9ce0

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    Ballance, C. P. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 3560, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1861

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    2024, MNRAS, 529, 2918, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3688

    Bauswein, A. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 2918, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3688

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    2022, MNRAS, 515, 631, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1258

    Goriely, S. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 631, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1258

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    2011, ApJL, 738, L32, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/738/2/L32

    Goriely, S., Bauswein, A., & Janka, H.-T. 2011, ApJL, 738, L32, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/738/2/L32

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    2021, MNRAS, 506, 5863, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1975 —

    Hotokezaka, K., Tanaka, M., Kato, D., & Gaigalas, G. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 5863, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1975 —. 2022, MNRAS, 515, L89, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slac071 —. 2023, MNRAS, 526, L155, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad128

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    H., Lasher, G., Chan, K

    Karp, A. H., Lasher, G., Chan, K. L., & Salpeter, E. E. 1977, ApJ, 214, 161, doi: 10.1086/155241

    1977 doi

  22. [30]

    R., & Barnes, J

    Kasen, D., Badnell, N. R., & Barnes, J. 2013, ApJ, 774, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/25

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    2017, Nature, 551, 80, doi: 10.1038/nature24453

    Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2017, Nature, 551, 80, doi: 10.1038/nature24453

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    2024, MNRAS, 535, 2670, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2504

    Rynkun, P. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 2670, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2504

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    2018, ApJL, 865, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aade02

    Kawaguchi, K., Shibata, M., & Tanaka, M. 2018, ApJL, 865, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aade02

    2018 doi

  26. [34]

    2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Kotani, T., Tamura, M., Nishikawa, J., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10702, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, ed. C. J

    2018

  27. [35]

    Simard, & H

    Evans, L. Simard, & H. Takami, 1070211, doi: 10.1117/12.2311836

    doi

  28. [36]

    Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team

    Kramida, A., Yu. Ralchenko, Reader, J., & and NIST ASD Team. 2023, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.11), [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd [2017, April 9]. National Institute of Standards and

    2023

  29. [37]

    A., Stempels, H

    Kupka, F., Piskunov, N., Ryabchikova, T. A., Stempels, H. C., & Weiss, W. W. 1999, A&AS, 138, 119, doi: 10.1051/aas:1999267

    1999 doi

  30. [38]

    M., & Schramm, D

    Lattimer, J. M., & Schramm, D. N. 1974, ApJL, 192, L145, doi: 10.1086/181612

    1974 doi

  31. [39]

    1998, ApJL, 507, L59, doi: 10.1086/311680

    Li, L.-X., & Paczy´ nski, B. 1998, ApJL, 507, L59, doi: 10.1086/311680

    1998 doi

  32. [40]

    D., Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, G., Darbha, S., et al

    Metzger, B. D., Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, G., Darbha, S., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 2650, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16864.x

    2010

  33. [41]

    Wahlgren, G. M. 2020, ApJ, 899, 166, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba361

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    2022, ApJ, 925, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3751

    Perego, A., Vescovi, D., Fiore, A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 925, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3751

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    2017, Nature, 551, 67, doi: 10.1038/nature24298

    Pian, E., D’Avanzo, P., Benetti, S., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 67, doi: 10.1038/nature24298

    2017 doi

  36. [44]

    E., Kupka, F., Ryabchikova, T

    Piskunov, N. E., Kupka, F., Ryabchikova, T. A., Weiss, W. W., & Jeffery, C. S. 1995, A&AS, 112, 525

    1995

  37. [45]

    2012, Turbospectrum: Code for spectral synthesis, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1205.004 NIR Features of KNe: The Importance of Gd 15

    Plez, B. 2012, Turbospectrum: Code for spectral synthesis, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1205.004 NIR Features of KNe: The Importance of Gd 15

    2012

  38. [46]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 5220, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3106

    Pognan, Q., Grumer, J., Jerkstrand, A., & Wanajo, S. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 5220, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3106

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    2022a, MNRAS, 510, 3806, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3674 —

    Pognan, Q., Jerkstrand, A., & Grumer, J. 2022a, MNRAS, 510, 3806, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3674 —. 2022b, MNRAS, 513, 5174, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1253

    doi

  40. [48]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.16210, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16210

    Pognan, Q., Wu, M.-R., Mart ´ ınez-Pinedo, G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.16210, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16210

    2024 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    M., & Adelman, S

    Pyper, D. M., & Adelman, S. J. 2017, PASP, 129, 104203, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aa7c9e Radˇ zi¯ ut˙ e, L., Gaigalas, G., Kato, D., Rynkun, P., &

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    2020, ApJS, 248, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab8312 —

    Tanaka, M. 2020, ApJS, 248, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab8312 —. 2021, ApJS, 257, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1ad2

    2020 doi

  43. [51]

    F., Kasen, D., Lee, W

    Roberts, L. F., Kasen, D., Lee, W. H., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2011, ApJL, 736, L21, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/736/1/L21

    2011 doi

  44. [52]

    L., et al

    Ryabchikova, T., Piskunov, N., Kurucz, R. L., et al. 2015, PhyS, 90, 054005, doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005

    2015 doi

  45. [53]

    Ryabtsev, A. N. 2010, private communication

    2010

  46. [54]

    2017, PhRvD, 96, 123012, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.123012

    Shibata, M., Fujibayashi, S., Hotokezaka, K., et al. 2017, PhRvD, 96, 123012, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.123012

    2017 doi

  47. [55]

    J., Chen, T

    Smartt, S. J., Chen, T. W., Jerkstrand, A., et al. 2017, Nature, 551, 75, doi: 10.1038/nature24303

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.12907, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.12907

    Sneppen, A., Damgaard, R., Watson, D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.12907, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.12907

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    2023, A&A, 675, A194, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346421

    Sneppen, A., & Watson, D. 2023, A&A, 675, A194, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346421

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tamura, M., Suto, H., Nishikawa, J., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, ed. I. S. McLean, S. K. Ramsay, & H. Takami, 84461T, doi: 10.1117/12.925885

    2012 doi

  51. [59]

    2013, ApJ, 775, 113, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/113

    Tanaka, M., & Hotokezaka, K. 2013, ApJ, 775, 113, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/113

    2013 doi

  52. [60]

    2014, ApJ, 780, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/31

    Tanaka, M., Hotokezaka, K., Kyutoku, K., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/31

    2014 doi

  53. [61]

    2020, MNRAS, 496, 1369, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1576

    Tanaka, M., Kato, D., Gaigalas, G., & Kawaguchi, K. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 1369, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1576

    2020 doi

  54. [62]

    A., et al

    Tanaka, M., Utsumi, Y., Mazzali, P. A., et al. 2017, PASJ, 69, 102, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx121

    2017 doi

  55. [63]

    2023, ApJ, 953, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc95

    Tanaka, M., Domoto, N., Aoki, W., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc95

    2023 doi

  56. [64]

    R., Levan, A

    Tanvir, N. R., Levan, A. J., Gonz´ alez-Fern´ andez, C., et al. 2017, ApJL, 848, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa90b6

    2017 doi

  57. [65]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.13061, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.13061

    Tarumi, Y., Hotokezaka, K., Domoto, N., & Tanaka, M. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.13061, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.13061

    2023 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    2017, PASJ, 69, 101, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx118

    Utsumi, Y., Tanaka, M., Tominaga, N., et al. 2017, PASJ, 69, 101, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx118

    2017 doi

  59. [67]

    2018, ApJ, 868, 65, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae0f2

    Wanajo, S. 2018, ApJ, 868, 65, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae0f2

    2018 doi

  60. [68]

    2014, ApJL, 789, L39, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/789/2/L39

    Wanajo, S., Sekiguchi, Y., Nishimura, N., et al. 2014, ApJL, 789, L39, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/789/2/L39

    2014 doi

  61. [69]

    J., Selsing, J., et al

    Watson, D., Hansen, C. J., Selsing, J., et al. 2019, Nature, 574, 497, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1676-3

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.