Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 31 references

Computing rough solutions of the stochastic nonlinear wave equation

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs a filtered exponential integrator that computes rough solutions of the stochastic nonlinear wave equation with initial data in $H^{\gamma} \times H^{\gamma-1}$, proving mean-square rates up to $\tau^{2\gamma-}$ in one…

desk verdict New convergence rates for the stochastic wave equation with rough data are real for f=0, but Theorem 2.1 overreaches: the general nonlinearity is asserted, not proved. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14644 v1 pith:RUA5YWR7 submitted 2024-12-19 math.NA cs.NA

Jiachuan Cao , Buyang Li , Katharina Schratz This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NA MSC 65M1265M1535Q55
keywords stochasticnonlinearwaveequationlowregularityhighorderconvergenceerrorestimatesexponentialintegratormultiplicativenoiseroughinitialdataFourierspectralmethod
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a filtered exponential integrator can compute rough solutions of the stochastic nonlinear wave equation with multiplicative Itô noise at convergence rates that were previously out of reach. For initial data in $H^{\gamma} \times H^{\gamma-1}$, the scheme is proved to achieve mean-square error of order $\tau^{2\gamma-}$ in one and two dimensions for $\gamma \in (0,\tfrac12]$ and $\tau^{\max(\gamma, 2\gamma-\tfrac12-)}$ in three dimensions for $\gamma \in (0,\tfrac34]$. These are the first proven convergence rates for rough stochastic wave solutions below the regularity threshold $H^{1/2} \times H^{-1/2}$, where classical methods lose order and can develop spurious oscillations. The proof is carried out for the case $f(u)\equiv 0$, with the authors stating that the general nonlinear drift can be handled similarly.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the filtered low-regularity exponential integrator (2.10), which evolves the linear wave semigroup $e^{\tau L}$ and projects the data and nonlinearities through the frequency-localization operator $\Pi_{\tau^{-1}}$. Three estimates carry the proof: the identity $\frac{d}{ds} e^{-sL}\Sigma(e^{sL}U) = e^{-sL}(-\sigma(\tilde u), \sigma'(\tilde u)\tilde v)^\top$, used to control how the noise coefficient changes along the linear flow; negative-norm bounds such as $\|\sigma'(\Pi_N u)\Pi_N v\|_{H^{-1}} \lesssim N^{1-2\gamma+}$ in one and two dimensions and $N^{\tfrac32-2\gamma+}$ in three dimensions; and a frequency-localization estimate for $\Sigma(U)-\Sigma(\Pi_N U)$ in $L^2\times H^{-1}$. A second-order Taylor expansion of $\Sigma$ around $e^{sL}U(t_n)$ splits the stochastic increment into a dominant term $\Pi_{\tau^{-1}}\Sigma(\Pi_{\tau^{-1}}U^n)\Delta_n W$ and remainders of size $\tau^3$, $\tau^4$, and $\tau^{1+4\gamma-}$ (or $\tau^{4\gamma-}$ in 3D), which are then summed through a discrete Gronwall argument.

What would settle it

Run the scheme (2.10) on the one-dimensional equation with a nonzero smooth drift, say $f(u)=\sin(u)$, noise $\sigma(u)=16\sin(u)$, and rough initial data in $H^{1/4}\times H^{-3/4}$, and estimate the Monte Carlo mean-square $L^2\times H^{-1}$ error over decreasing step sizes $\tau$; if the observed convergence slope falls clearly below the claimed $\tau^{1/2-}$ as $\tau\to 0$, the unproved $f\neq 0$ extension is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 2.1: for the semilinear stochastic wave equation $\partial_{tt}u - \Delta u = f(u) + \sigma(u)\,dW$ on the $d$-dimensional torus, the filtered low-regularity exponential integrator $U^{n+1} = e^{\tau L}U^n + \tau e^{\tau L}\Pi_{\tau^{-1}}F(\Pi_{\tau^{-1}}U^n) + e^{\tau L}\Pi_{\tau^{-1}}\Sigma(\Pi_{\tau^{-1}}U^n)\Delta_n W$ has mean-square $L^2 \times H^{-1}$ error of order $\tau^{2\gamma-}$ in one and two dimensions and $\tau^{\max(\gamma, 2\gamma-\tfrac12-)}$ in three dimensions whenever the initial pair lies in $H^{\gamma}\times H^{\gamma-1}$. The discovery is that one can avoid Hölder continuity of the exact solution in time entirely: the noise coefficient is expanded in a Taylor series along the linear wave flow, the error terms $R_1$, $I_2$, and $R_2$ are bounded using Itô isometry and negative-norm estimates for $\sigma'(\Pi_N u)\Pi_N v$, and the term $\tau e^{\tau L}\Pi_{\tau^{-1}}F(\Pi_{\tau^{-1}}U^n)$ is included for the drift. The resulting rates double the previously known order in one and two dimensions for rough data, and give the first proof of convergence below $H^{1/2}\times H^{-1/2}$; the proof as written restricts the error analysis to $f\equiv 0$.

Load-bearing premise

The stated rates are proved only when the equation's nonlinear drift term is zero; the theorem as stated for a general drift depends on the authors' assertion, made without carrying out the analysis, that the same error bounds follow, and on earlier cited estimates that are used without proof here.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In one and two dimensions, rough initial data in $H^{\gamma}\times H^{\gamma-1}$ with $\gamma\in(0,\tfrac12]$ are computed at rate $\tau^{2\gamma-}$, twice the previously available rate under the same regularity.
  • In three dimensions the scheme is proved to converge at rate $\tau^{\gamma}$ for $\gamma\in(0,\tfrac12]$ and $\tau^{2\gamma-\tfrac12-}$ for $\gamma\in(\tfrac12,\tfrac34]$, extending proven convergence below $H^{1/2}\times H^{-1/2}$.
  • The fully discrete version with Fourier spectral discretization and high-frequency recovery costs $O(N^d\log(N)^d T/\tau + N^{\alpha d})$ overall, because the high-frequency part is recovered once as $e^{TL}\Pi_{(N,N^\alpha]}U^0$ instead of being stepped every time level.
  • Piecewise smooth and discontinuous initial data can be evolved without the spurious oscillations seen with semi-implicit Euler-Maruyama and stochastic trigonometric schemes in the numerical experiments.
  • If the asserted extension to $f\neq 0$ holds, the same scheme applies to semilinear stochastic wave equations with smooth bounded nonlinearities, not only to the pure noise case analyzed in the proof.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the frequency-filtering mechanism suggests a template for other stochastic dispersive equations: project the SPDE data and noise coefficient at the time-step scale, evolve everything above that scale exactly with the linear flow, and Taylor-expand the nonlinearity along that flow.
  • The dimension-dependent negative-norm estimates imply the practical gain is largest in one and two dimensions; in three dimensions, for very rough data with small $\gamma$, the proven rate drops to $\tau^{\gamma}$, so the benefit over classical methods is smaller and should not be oversold.
  • A direct test of the unproved $f\neq 0$ extension is to run (2.10) with a nonzero smooth drift and compare empirical mean-square rates with Theorem 2.1; the paper's own experiments focus on the multiplicative noise case, so the general-drift claim remains the main open check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a filtered low-regularity exponential integrator (2.10) for the stochastic nonlinear wave equation with multiplicative Itô noise and rough initial data in H^γ × H^{γ−1}. Theorem 2.1 claims mean-square convergence rates in L^2 × H^{−1}: O(τ^{2γ−}) in one and two dimensions for γ ∈ (0,1/2], O(τ^γ) in three dimensions for γ ∈ (0,1/2], and O(τ^{2γ−1/2−}) in three dimensions for γ ∈ (1/2,3/4]. The proof strategy combines the variation-of-constants formula, a Taylor expansion of the noise coefficient σ around the linear flow, frequency localization at the scale τ^{−1}, and negative-norm estimates for the resulting remainder terms. Numerical experiments in one and two dimensions with discontinuous and rough initial data compare the method with Euler–Maruyama and stochastic trigonometric integrators.

Significance. For the f ≡ 0 case, the paper contains a coherent derivation of the stated convergence rates, and the rates improve on existing methods under the same low regularity assumptions. The analysis is genuinely a priori: there are no fitted parameters, and the convergence rates are consequences of the stated estimates. If the theorem is corrected to cover exactly what is proved, namely the multiplicative-noise stochastic wave equation with f ≡ 0, this is a solid contribution and appears to be the first convergence proof in the regime below H^{1/2} × H^{−1/2}. However, the main theorem as stated claims convergence for the general nonlinearity f, while the proof and all numerical experiments treat only f ≡ 0; the significance of the paper is therefore conditional on either proving the nonlinear case or restricting the claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2 (Theorem 2.1) and Section 4] Theorem 2.1 is stated for a general nonlinearity f satisfying (2.3), and the scheme (2.10) contains the deterministic term τ e^{τL} Π_{τ^{-1}} F(Π_{τ^{-1}} U^n). However, the proof in Section 4 is carried out only for f ≡ 0. The text states this explicitly at the end of Section 2, and Lemmas 4.1–4.3 bound only the remainders R1, I2, and R2 arising from the multiplicative noise. The remainder in (4.30)–(4.31) and the error recursion in (4.32)–(4.35) contain no contribution from the drift F. The assertion that the general case can be handled “in the similar way” is not a proof: the one-step consistency error of the deterministic term, namely ∫_0^τ e^{(τ−s)L} F(U(t_n+s)) ds − τ e^{τL} Π_{τ^{-1}} F(Π_{τ^{-1}} U(t_n)), is not bounded at the required rate, and known low-regularity integrators for deterministic nonlinear wave equations need nontrivial resonance corrections to reach such rates. Since every numerical experiment in Section 5 also takes f ≡ 0, the theorem as stated is not established. The authors should either prove the f ≠ 0 case or state and prove the theorem for f ≡ 0, revising the abstract and introduction accordingly.
  2. [Lemma 4.2] The proof of Lemma 4.2 is terse at the point where the estimate E∥I2∥_1^2 ≲ τ^4 is derived. The argument needs a precise bound for ∥Σ′(e^{sL}U(t_n))(e^{(s−δ)L} − I)Σ(U(t_n+δ))∥_1. The displayed computation jumps from this norm to (s−δ)^2 times a bound involving Σ′LΣ. The intended bound can likely be justified using |sin(x)/x| ≤ 1 for the first component of (e^{hL} − I)Σ, but that justification is not given. Since this lemma is used in the final remainder estimate, the proof should be completed or the step should be stated as a separate estimate.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Theorem 2.1] The abstract says the method achieves convergence for initial data in H^γ × H^{γ−1} “for all γ > 0,” while Theorem 2.1 states explicit rates only for γ ∈ (0,1/2] in d = 1,2 and γ ∈ (0,3/4] in d = 3. Please align the abstract with the theorem, or state what is proved for γ beyond these ranges.
  2. [Lemma 3.5] Lemma 3.5, which supplies the one- and two-dimensional negative-norm estimates, is essential for the d = 1,2 rates in Lemma 4.3 but is imported from the authors’ paper [6] without proof. If [6] is not yet available, the present paper is not self-contained; please state these estimates as assumptions or reproduce their proofs.
  3. [Notation throughout] The notation τ^{2γ−} and τ^{4γ−} with a trailing “−” is informal. It would be clearer to say explicitly that the bounds hold for every ε > 0 with constants depending on ε, or to define the “−” convention once in Section 2.
  4. [Section 5 and figure captions] There are several typographical issues: “prseented” in Example 5.3, “walk-clock time” in Figures 2, 4, 6, and “L2(Ω) × H−1(Ω)” in captions where the spatial domain is O. These should be corrected.
  5. [Algorithm 1 and (5.1)] The notation in (5.1) writes U_N^{n+1} on both sides of the first line; the high-frequency recovery step in Algorithm 1 also writes U^{T/τ} where U_N^{T/τ} is meant. Please clarify the notation for the fully discrete variable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the f≡0 case is unproved, but that is an incompleteness gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

Flagged limitation: Theorem 2.1 is stated for the full nonlinear drift f under condition (2.3), yet the paper explicitly restricts the analysis: 'we will focus on the case f(u) ≡ 0 in the rest of this paper' (end of Section 2). All of Section 4.1 bounds only noise-related remainders R1, I2, R2 (Lemmas 4.1–4.3), and the error recursion (4.32)–(4.35) contains no deterministic remainder from F. The general f case is asserted 'in the similar way' without proof. This is a correctness/incompleteness concern, not a circularity: the claimed theorem is broader than what is proved, but the proof for f≡0 does not reduce to its own input by construction. I find no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no ansatz smuggled in via citation, and no load-bearing self-citation that imports the target convergence result. The 1D/2D negative-norm estimates cited from the authors' prior work [6] (Lemma 3.5, Lemma 3.7) are independent a priori estimates with stated assumptions that do not include Theorem 2.1; per the review rules such citations count as real evidence and do not raise the circularity score. The scheme in (2.10) is derived in Section 4.1 from a Taylor expansion of Σ and explicit remainder estimates, and the rates in (2.11) follow from those estimates plus Gronwall's inequality, not from matching the method to a precomputed error curve. Therefore no circular step is exhibited, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No physical entities or fitted constants are introduced. The analysis assumes standard well-posedness of the SPDE, smoothness of nonlinearities, and relies on negative-norm estimates from the authors' prior work for 1D/2D.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The stochastic nonlinear wave equation (1.1) with multiplicative Itô noise is well-posed in H^γ×H^{γ−1} for γ>0, with the moment bound (2.8).
    Invoked in Section 2.1, equation (2.8), citing [22, Section 7.1] and [28, Theorem 2.1].
  • domain assumption The nonlinearities f and σ satisfy the bounded-derivative condition (2.3).
    Assumed in Section 2.1, equation (2.3), used throughout the proofs of Lemmas 3.1, 4.1 and the negative-norm estimates.
  • domain assumption Negative-norm composition estimates for d=1,2 in Lemma 3.5 hold as proved in [6].
    The lemma is stated with reference to [6] and is not proved in this paper; the d=1,2 convergence rates depend on it.
  • standard math Sobolev embedding and Bernstein inequalities hold (Lemma 3.3).
    Used in Lemmas 3.5-3.7 and Section 4; standard harmonic analysis results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Computing rough solutions of the stochastic nonlinear wave equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RUA5YWR7

@misc{pith2026241214644,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Computing rough solutions of the stochastic nonlinear wave equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RUA5YWR7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14644}
}
abstract

The regularity of solutions to the stochastic nonlinear wave equation plays a critical role in the accuracy and efficiency of numerical algorithms. Rough or discontinuous initial conditions pose significant challenges, often leading to a loss of accuracy and reduced computational efficiency in existing methods. In this study, we address these challenges by developing a novel and efficient numerical algorithm specifically designed for computing rough solutions of the stochastic nonlinear wave equation, while significantly relaxing the regularity requirements on the initial data. By leveraging the intrinsic structure of the stochastic nonlinear wave equation and employing advanced tools from harmonic analysis, we construct a time discretization method that achieves robust convergence for initial values \((u^{0}, v^{0}) \in H^{\gamma} \times H^{\gamma-1}\) for all \(\gamma > 0\). Notably, our method attains an improved error rate of \(O(\tau^{2\gamma-})\) in one and two dimensions for \(\gamma \in (0, \frac{1}{2}]\), and \(O(\tau^{\max(\gamma, 2\gamma - \frac{1}{2}-)})\) in three dimensions for \(\gamma \in (0, \frac{3}{4}]\), where \(\tau\) denotes the time step size. These convergence rates surpass those of existing numerical methods under the same regularity conditions, underscoring the advantage of our approach. To validate the performance of our method, we present extensive numerical experiments that demonstrate its superior accuracy and computational efficiency compared to state-of-the-art methods. These results highlight the potential of our approach to enable accurate and efficient simulations of stochastic wave phenomena even in the presence of challenging initial conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14644 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Numerical solutions of the 1D problem (Example 5.1). 10 2 10 1 10 2 10 1 10 0 L 2 ( ) × H 1 ( ) e r r o r HR-LRI Euler-Maruyama stochastic trigonometric O( ) (a) L 2 (Ω) × H−1 (Ω) error versus τ 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 walk-clock time 10 2 10 1 10 0 L 2 ( ) × H 1 ( ) e r r o r HR-LRI Euler-Maruyama stochastic trigonometric (b) L 2 (Ω) × H−1 (Ω) error versus CPU time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Errors of the numerical solutions by several methods (Example 5.1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Numerical solutions in H 1 2 × H− 1 2 and H4 × H3 (Example 5.2). 10 2 10 1 10 3 10 2 10 1 L 2 ( ) × H 1 ( ) e r r o r HR-LRI Euler-Maruyama stochastic trigonometric O( ) (a) L 2 (Ω) × H−1 (Ω) error vs τ for γ = 1 2 10 4 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 walk-clock time 10 2 10 1 L 2 ( ) × H 1 ( ) e r r o r HR-LRI Euler-Maruyama stochastic trigonometric (b) L 2 (Ω)× H−1 (Ω) error vs CPU time for γ = 1 2 10 2 10 1 10 3 10 2 10 1 L … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Errors of the numerical solutions by several methods (Example 5.2) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Numerical solutions of the 2D problem (Example 5.3). 10 2 10 2 10 1 L 2 ( ) × H 1 ( ) e r r o r HR-LRI Euler-Maruyama stochastic trigonometric O( 0.75 ) (a) L 2 (Ω) × H−1 (Ω) error versus τ 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 walk-clock time 10 1 L 2 ( ) × H 1 ( ) e r r o r HR-LRI Eul…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Errors of the numerical solutions by several methods (Example 5.3) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Numerical solutions in two dimensions (Example 5.4). 10 2 10 1 L 2 ( ) × H 1 ( ) e r r o r HR-LRI Euler-Maruyama stochastic trigonometric O( 0.75 ) (a) L 2 (Ω) × H−1 (Ω) error vs τ for γ = 1 2 10 2 10 2 10 1 L 2 ( ) × H 1 ( ) e r r o r HR-LRI Euler-Maruyama stochastic …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Errors of the numerical solutions by several methods (Example 5.4). 6. Conclusion By leveraging the structure of the stochastic nonlinear wave equation and utilizing harmonic analysis tools such as low- and high-frequency decomposition techniques, we have developed an …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    Jiachuan Cao, Buyang Li, Yanping Lin, and F angyan Yao : Numerical approximation of discontinuous solutions of the nonlinear wave equation, to appear in SIAM J. Numer. Anal

    work page

  2. [1]

    Yvonne Alama Bronsard, Yvain Bruned, and Katharina Schratz: Approximations of dispersive PDEs in the presence of low-regularity randomness. Found. Comput. Math. (2024): pp. 1–51

    work page 2024

  3. [2]

    Rikard Anton, David Cohen, Stig Larsson, and Xiaojie Wang: Full discretization of semilinear stochastic wave equations driven by multiplicative noise.SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 54 (2016), pp. 1093– 1119

    work page 2016

  4. [3]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16690 (2023)

    Jacob Armstrong-Goodall, and Yvain Bruned: Resonance based schemes for SPDEs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16690 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  5. [4]

    Lehel Banjai, Gabriel Lord, and Jeta Molla: Strong convergence of a Verlet integrator for the semilinear stochastic wave equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 59 (2021), pp. 1976–2003

    work page 2021

  6. [5]

    To appear in Forum of Mathematics, Pi , 10, E2

    Yvain Bruned and Katharina Schratz: Resonance based schemes for dispersive equations via deco- rated trees. To appear in Forum of Mathematics, Pi , 10, E2. DOI:10.1017/fmp.2021.13

    doi:10.1017/fmp.2021.13 2021

  7. [7]

    Chuchu Chen, Jialin Hong, Chol Sim, and Kwang Sonwu: Energy and quadratic invariants preserving (EQUIP) multi-symplectic methods for Hamiltonian wave equations. J. Comput. Phys. 418 (2020), article 10959

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    David Cohen, Ernst Hairer, and Christian Lubich: Conservation of energy, momentum and actions in numerical discretizations of non-linear wave equations. Numer. Math. 110 (2008), pp. 113–143

    work page 2008

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    David Cohen, Stig Larsson, and Magdalena Sigg: A trigonometric method for the linear stochastic wave equation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51 (2013), pp. 204–222

    2013

  2. [10]

    David Cohen, and Llu ´ ıs Quer-Sardanyons: A fully discrete approximation of the one-dimensional stochastic wave equation. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 36 (2016), pp. 400–420

    2016

  3. [11]

    Sonja Cox, Arnulf Jentzen, and Felix Lindner: Weak convergence rates for temporal numerical approximations of the semilinear stochastic wave equation with multiplicative noise. Numer. Math. (2024): pp. 1-47

    2024

  4. [12]

    Dalang: The stochastic wave equation

    Robert C. Dalang: The stochastic wave equation. In: A Minicourse on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations. Lecture Notes in Math. , vol. 1962, pp. 39–71. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Xiaobing Feng, Akash Ashirbad Panda, and Andreas Prohl: Higher order time discretization for the stochastic nonlinear wave equation with multiplicative noise. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 44 (2024), pp. 836–885

    2024

  6. [14]

    Guo: Spectral Methods and Their Applications

    B. Guo: Spectral Methods and Their Applications. World Scientific (1998)

    1998

  7. [15]

    Martina Hofmanov´ a and Katharina Schratz: An exponential-type integrator for the KdV equation. Numer. Math. 136 (2017), pp. 1117–1137. 21

    2017

  8. [16]

    Jialin Hong, Baohui Hou and Liying Sun: Energy-preserving fully-discrete schemes for nonlinear stochastic wave equations with multiplicative noise. J. Comput. Phys. 451 (2022) 110829

    2022

  9. [17]

    Shreve: Brownian motion and stochastic calculus

    Ioannis Karatzas and Steven E. Shreve: Brownian motion and stochastic calculus. Springer, 1998

    1998

  10. [18]

    Fully discrete schemes

    Mih´ aly Kov´ acs, Stig Larsson, and Fredrik Lindgren: Weak convergence of finite element approxi- mations of linear stochastic evolution equations with additive noise II. Fully discrete schemes. BIT Numer. Math. 53 (2013), pp. 497–525

    2013

  11. [19]

    To appear in ESAIM:M2AN

    Buyang Li, Katharina Schratz, and Franco Zivcovich: A second-order low-regularity correction of Lie splitting for the nonlinear wave equation. To appear in ESAIM:M2AN

  12. [20]

    Alexander Ostermann and Katharina Schratz: Low regularity exponential-type integrators for semi- linear Schr¨ odinger equations.Found. Comput. Math. 18 (2018), pp. 731–755

    2018

  13. [21]

    To appear in J

    Alexander Ostermann, Fr´ ed´ eric Rousset, and Katharina Schratz: Fourier integrator for periodic NLS: low regularity estimates via discrete Bourgain spaces. To appear in J. Eur. Math. Soc

  14. [22]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Giuseppe Da Prato, and Jerzy Zabczyk: Stochastic Equation in Infinite Dimensions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    1996

  15. [23]

    Potential Anal

    Llu ´ ıs Quer-Sardanyons, and Marta Sanz-Sol´ e: Space semi-discretisations for a stochastic wave equa- tion. Potential Anal. 24 (2006), pp. 303–332

    2006

  16. [24]

    Fr´ ed´ eric Rousset and Katharina Schratz: A general framework of low-regularity integrators.SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 59 (2021), pp. 1735–1768

    2021

  17. [25]

    Thomas: Persistent energy flow for a stochastic wave equation model in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics

    Lawrence E. Thomas: Persistent energy flow for a stochastic wave equation model in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics. J. Math. Phys. 53(9), 095208 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Walsh: On numerical solutions of the stochastic wave equation

    John B. Walsh: On numerical solutions of the stochastic wave equation. Illinois J. Math. 50 (2006), pp. 991–1018

    2006

  19. [27]

    Xiaojie Wang, Siqing Gan, and Jingtian Tang: Higher order strong approximations of semilinear stochastic wave equation with additive space-time white noise. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36 (2014), pp. A2611–A2632

    2014

  20. [28]

    Xiaojie Wang: An exponential integrator scheme for time discretization of nonlinear stochastic wave equation. J. Sci. Comput. 64 (2015), pp. 234–263

    2015

  21. [29]

    Yongsheng Li, Yifei Wu, and Fangyan Yao: Convergence of an embedded exponential-type low- regularity integrators for the KdV equation without loss of regularity. Ann. Appl. Math. 37 (2021), pp. 1–21

    2021

  22. [30]

    Yifei Wu and Xiaofei Zhao: Optimal convergence of a first order low-regularity integrator for the KdV equation. IMA J. Numer. Anal. (2021), DOI: 10.1093/imanum/drab054

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    BIT Numer

    Yifei Wu and Xiaofei Zhao: Embedded exponential-type low-regularity integrators for KdV equation under rough data. BIT Numer. Math. 62 (2022), pp. 1049–1090. Jiachuan Cao and Buyang Li: Department of Applied Mathematics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong. Email a...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.