Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 82 references

Phase diagram of the XXZ pyrochlore model from pseudo-Majorana functional renormalization group

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A temperature-flow renormalization group maps the full phase diagram of the spin-1/2 XXZ pyrochlore model and argues that the antiferromagnetic XY limit favors a lattice nematic ground state.

desk verdict First full T-flow PMFRG phase diagram for the XXZ pyrochlore magnet; the lower boundary is QMC-validated, but the upper boundary and nematic proposal rest on weaker evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14773 v1 pith:FDQUH2WA submitted 2024-12-19 cond-mat.str-el

Yannik Schaden , Matías G. Gonzalez , Johannes Reuther This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords XXZpyrochloremodelpseudo-Majoranafunctionalrenormalizationgroupquantumspinicetemperature-flowformalismlatticestructurefactornematicorderfrustratedmagnetism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out the full temperature–coupling phase diagram of the spin-1/2 nearest-neighbour XXZ model on the pyrochlore lattice, a central frustrated three-dimensional magnet. Using the temperature-flow pseudo-Majorana functional renormalization group, it finds a large low-temperature non-magnetic region from $\theta=-0.027\pi$ to $\theta=0.554\pi$ that contains the zero-flux quantum spin ice phase near the antiferromagnetic Ising limit, the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg point at $\theta=\pi/4$, and the antiferromagnetic XY point at $\theta=\pi/2$. This matters because it places several long-studied models into one phase diagram and shows where quantum fluctuations destroy magnetic order. The lower boundary agrees with quantum Monte Carlo, and the study proposes a lattice nematic ground state for the antiferromagnetic XY model based on enhanced symmetry-breaking responses.

What carries the argument

The workhorse is the pseudo-Majorana functional renormalization group in the temperature-flow variant (T-flow PMFRG), in which spins are rewritten as three Majorana fermions and the renormalization group cutoff is the physical temperature, so a single numerical run covers the whole cooling history. The flow equations for the self-energy and two-particle vertex are solved under the one-loop truncation. Magnetic transitions are located by a finite-size scaling collapse of the correlation length ratio $\xi^\mu/L$ computed from the peak of the spin structure factor $S^\mu(Q)$ for system sizes $N=459,1029,1941$. Nematic tendencies are probed by linear response functions $\chi^\mu_R$ to perturbations that strengthen and weaken bonds in patterns breaking $C_3$, inversion, or both.

What would settle it

A definitive check would be an unbiased low-temperature calculation of the same boundaries, for example sign-free quantum Monte Carlo in the unfrustrated transverse sector or a tensor-network or high-order series calculation near $\theta=0.554\pi$, looking for whether the upper non-magnetic boundary sits near the PMFRG value or the cluster mean-field value $0.613\pi$, and whether the QSI$_0$/FM$_\perp$ boundary remains at $\theta\approx-0.033\pi$. Within PMFRG itself, rerunning the scaling analysis with a fourth system size near $N=4000$ would reveal whether the $\xi/L$ collapse of the two largest sizes continues or drifts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the spin-1/2 XXZ pyrochlore model, with couplings parametrized as $J_\perp=J\sin\theta$ and $J_z=J\cos\theta$, has a broad low-temperature non-magnetic phase for $\theta\in[-0.027\pi,\,0.554\pi]$. Inside this phase sit the zero-flux quantum spin ice (QSI$_0$) regime near the antiferromagnetic Ising limit, the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model at $\theta=\pi/4$, and the antiferromagnetic XY model at $\theta=\pi/2$. The phase is bounded on one side by ferromagnetic order in the $xy$-plane and on the other by Ising-type ferromagnetic order along $z$; the QSI$_0$-to-FM$_\perp$ transition at $\theta=-0.027\pi$ agrees with the quantum Monte Carlo value $\theta=-0.033\pi$. The paper further argues, from growing linear responses to $C_3$ and combined $C_3$/inversion symmetry-breaking perturbations, that the antiferromagnetic XY model tends to a lattice nematic ground state. In the disordered region the longitudinal and transverse structure factors show broadened pinch points that sharpen as magnetic order is approached.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the one-loop truncated, temperature-flow equations remain quantitatively accurate down to $T\approx0.01J$, far below the $T\gg J$ regime where the expansion is controlled, and that a scaling collapse using only the two largest system sizes identifies genuine second-order transitions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the phase diagram is correct, the zero-flux quantum spin ice phase occupies only a narrow window near the antiferromagnetic Ising limit, and antiferromagnetic Heisenberg and XY pyrochlore magnets stay non-magnetic down to $T\approx0.01J$.
  • The agreement at the lower boundary would show that T-flow PMFRG can locate phase transitions well beyond its perturbatively controlled regime, making it a usable tool for other strongly frustrated three-dimensional magnets.
  • The identified quantum order-by-disorder at both boundaries means quantum fluctuations shrink the non-magnetic region relative to the classical model, reversing earlier variational expectations at the upper boundary.
  • Broadened pinch points in the structure factors give momentum-resolved fingerprints that neutron scattering or other probes could look for in pyrochlore materials.
  • A lattice nematic ground state of the antiferromagnetic XY model would resolve the competition between spin-nematic and QSI$_\pi$ proposals for this limit.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same response-function logic could be extended to test in-plane spin-nematic order ($J_x\ne J_y$) once the method is generalized to XYZ couplings; the authors already identify this as the natural next step.
  • If the lattice-nematic proposal survives, it would unify the classical thermal order-by-disorder selection of collinear states with a quantum analogue in the XY limit, giving a single mechanism across classical and quantum versions.
  • The discrepancy at the upper boundary ($0.554\pi$ vs $0.613\pi$) is the sharpest place to discriminate between approximations; a future unbiased calculation there would also calibrate how much the one-loop truncation underestimates quantum fluctuations.
  • The observed leakage of transverse spin correlations into the longitudinal structure factor at the XY point suggests that any experimental probe of $S^z$ in an XY-like material would see quantum-fluctuation-induced signal even with $J_z=0$, which may be a useful diagnostic.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the temperature-coupling phase diagram of the spin-1/2 XXZ pyrochlore model using the pseudo-Majorana functional renormalization group in its temperature-flow variant. It reports a large low-temperature non-magnetic regime between θ≈-0.027π and θ≈0.554π, containing the antiferromagnetic Ising, Heisenberg, and XY limits, surrounded by FM⊥ and FMz ferromagnetic phases. It also presents spin structure factors showing pinch-point patterns, and linear-response calculations suggesting a lattice nematic candidate for the antiferromagnetic XY model. The QSI0-to-FM⊥ transition agrees with quantum Monte Carlo, while the upper boundary disagrees with cluster mean-field theory.

Significance. If the phase boundaries are accurate, this is the first unified finite-temperature phase diagram for the full XXZ pyrochlore family, and the identification of a candidate lattice nematic state in the XY model would be an important step for a heavily studied frustrated magnet. The paper is commendably explicit about the method's regime of perturbative control and about the limitations of the nematic response functions; the agreement with QMC at the lower boundary and the comparison with classical Monte Carlo give useful external anchors. However, the central diagram currently lacks error estimates and the upper boundary rests on a single approximate method, so the quantitative claims should be treated with caution until additional benchmarks are provided.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III A and Fig. 3] Critical temperatures are read off from a collapse of ξµ/L using only the two largest system sizes (N=1029 and 1941). With only two sizes, the collapse criterion is a crossing of two curves; it does not test the scaling form, determine the universality class, or yield an error estimate. Since every phase boundary in Fig. 1(a) is obtained this way, the phase diagram has no reported uncertainty. I ask the authors to add at least one more system size, perform a systematic finite-size scaling analysis, or explicitly quantify the resulting uncertainty in θ and T_c; without this, the precision implied by the phase diagram (e.g., θ=-0.027π vs QMC -0.033π) is not established.
  2. [Sec. IV A and Table II] The upper boundary of the non-magnetic phase, θ=0.554π, is not benchmarked by any independent quantum method and deviates from the cluster mean-field result 0.613π by roughly 0.06π. The text interprets this as 'a larger stability of the FMz phase within PMFRG,' but given the paper's own statement in Sec. III A that the method is perturbatively controlled only for T≫J and in Sec. V that it 'is expected to lose quantitative accuracy at T<J,' a method error of this magnitude is equally plausible. The quantum order-by-disorder claim at the upper boundary needs either an independent cross-check (e.g., QMC where sign-problem free, or a different FRG truncation) or a demonstrated convergence with respect to the Matsubara cutoff and system size.
  3. [Sec. IV C and Fig. 5] The proposal of a lattice nematic ground state for the antiferromagnetic XY model is based exclusively on the linear response χ⊥R to seed fields. As the manuscript correctly notes in Sec. III A, large χ_R is not rigorously connected to nematic long-range order, and the method cannot detect the nematic transition. Moreover, the response functions cannot distinguish the proposed C3-nematic from the in-plane spin nematic of Ref. [23]. The conclusion in Sec. IV C that 'the pyrochlore XY model shows strong tendencies for realizing a nematic ground state' therefore overstates what the current data can establish; please reframe as a candidate consistent with the data and explicitly list the alternative orders.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II] The word 'antiferromagntic' is a typo for 'antiferromagnetic'.
  2. [Eq. (4) and surrounding text] The phrase 'steepest descend' should be 'steepest descent'.
  3. [Sec. III A] The numerical specification sentence leaves unclear whether the 48 positive Matsubara frequencies are used for all three system sizes; please clarify the numerical setup.
  4. [Fig. 1(a) and Table II] The phase boundary values are given to three decimals (e.g., -0.027π, 0.554π) but no error bars are shown; please add error bars or a statement that the last digit is not significant.
  5. [Sec. IV B] The red crosses marking the locations of the structure factors in Fig. 1(a) are mentioned in the caption but are not visible in the figure as provided; please ensure all structure-factor points are clearly marked.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: phase boundaries are direct PMFRG outputs benchmarked against independent QMC/MC, with self-citations only as methodological background.

full rationale

The phase diagram is obtained by numerically integrating the PMFRG flow equations (A.20)-(A.21) with bare-interaction initial conditions (A.25)-(A.28); no parameter is fitted to any benchmark. Transition temperatures are read off from xi/L crossings (Fig. 3), and the reported boundaries are then compared with, not derived from, independent results: QMC for QSI0-FM_perp (theta=-0.033pi vs -0.027pi), classical and quantum MC for ferromagnetic critical temperatures (Table I), and CMFT/CMC for the upper boundary (Table II). The unbenchmarked upper boundary and the two-size collapse are methodological robustness concerns, not circularity, because the comparison values are not inputs to the calculation. Self-citations to Refs. [37,39,48] concern method development and prior PFFRG response calculations; the low-temperature reliability claim is independently supported by the QMC agreement, and no cited theorem or prior result is invoked to force the phase-boundary choices. The paper's own caveats (Sec. III A: perturbative control only at T >> J; Sec. V: expected loss of quantitative accuracy at T < J) are acknowledged limitations rather than hidden circular definitions. No equation reduces to a fit or to a same-author assertion by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted constants: the phase boundaries are computed from the model and the numerical flow, not adjusted to reproduce any target result. The numerical resolution parameters listed above are nevertheless load-bearing in the sense that the reported accuracy depends on them, and no convergence data are supplied. The main epistemic burden sits in the one-loop truncation and the two-size scaling collapse, plus the choice of classical reference model for the order-by-disorder comparison. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Matsubara frequency cutoff = 48 positive Matsubara frequencies
    Sets the numerical truncation of all PMFRG runs; no convergence study with respect to this cutoff is reported.
  • PMFRG system sizes = N=459, 1029, 1941 correlated spins
    Used for finite-size scaling; critical temperatures are derived from a collapse of the two largest sizes, with no extrapolation to infinite size.
  • Nematic seed strength delta = 0.01
    Defines the symmetry-breaking perturbation in Eq. (5); the response functions in Eq. (6) are evaluated at this single value with no delta-to-zero limit.
  • Classical Monte Carlo system size = L=12, N=27648 spins
    Single system size used for classical phase boundaries in Fig. 1(a); no finite-size error estimate is reported.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption One-loop truncation of the PMFRG flow equations, neglecting three-particle and higher vertices except selected Katanin contributions, yields quantitatively reliable spin correlations in 3D frustrated magnets.
    Invoked in Sec. III A and the Appendix; because the method is expected to become inaccurate below T≈J, the low-temperature phase diagram depends on the truncation being adequate far outside its controlled regime.
  • domain assumption A scaling collapse of xi/L as a function of L identifies genuine second-order magnetic phase transitions.
    Used in Sec. IV A and Fig. 3 to place every magnetic phase boundary; only two system sizes are used for the collapse and no collapse-quality criterion is given.
  • standard math The Majorana spin representation in Eq. (2) and the standard functional RG flow equations derived in the Appendix are correct.
    Background formalism taken from Refs. [30,37,39]; not independently verified in this paper.
  • domain assumption Equal-time spin structure factors obtained from the two-particle vertex, Eqs. (A.29) and (A.30), encode the magnetic order and transition behavior.
    Central observable used for structure factors and correlation lengths; depends on the truncation preserving correlation physics.
  • domain assumption The classical Monte Carlo model with three-component unit vectors is the appropriate classical reference for extracting quantum order-by-disorder effects.
    Sec. III B and Sec. IV A; the authors note that ordering temperatures differ for discrete Ising spins, so the classical reference normalization affects the comparison.
  • domain assumption The linear nematic response functions chiR defined in Eq. (6) are meaningful indicators of nematic ordering tendencies even though direct four-spin correlations are not computed.
    Acknowledged as limited in Sec. III A; the XY nematic ground-state proposal rests on this indirect measure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase diagram of the XXZ pyrochlore model from pseudo-Majorana functional renormalization group." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FDQUH2WA

@misc{pith2026241214773,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase diagram of the XXZ pyrochlore model from pseudo-Majorana functional renormalization group},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FDQUH2WA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14773}
}
abstract

We calculate the magnetic phase diagram of the spin-$1/2$ nearest neighbor XXZ pyrochlore model using the pseudo-Majorana functional renormalization group in the temperature flow formalism. Our phase diagram as a function of temperature and coupling ratio, allowing both longitudinal and transverse couplings to be ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic, reveals a large non-magnetic regime at low temperatures, which includes the quantum spin ice phase near the antiferromagnetic Ising model, as well as the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg and XY models. We are able to detect magnetic phase transitions via critical finite size scaling down to temperatures two orders of magnitude smaller than the spin interactions, demonstrating the remarkably good performance of our method upon approaching the ground state. Specifically, the low temperature transition from the zero-flux quantum spin ice phase into the transverse ferromagnetic phase shows very good agreement with previous quantum Monte Carlo results. Comparing our findings with classical results, we identify a quantum order-by-disorder effect near the antiferromagnetic XY model. In magnetically disordered regimes, we find characteristic patterns of broadened pinch points in the spin structure factor and investigate their evolution when approaching magnetically ordered phases. We also compute linear responses to lattice symmetry breaking perturbations and identify a possible lattice nematic ground state of the antiferromagnetic XY model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14773 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Diagrammatic representation of the PMFRG equa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Correlation lengths [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Spin structure factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Responses to lattice symmetry breaking pertur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [81]

    Soldatov, K

    K. Soldatov, K. Nefedev, Y. Komura, and Y. Okabe, Large-scale calculation of ferromagnetic spin systems on the pyrochlore lattice, Physics Letters A381, 707 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [23]

    Benton, L

    O. Benton, L. D. C. Jaubert, R. R. P. Singh, J. Oit- maa, and N. Shannon, Quantum Spin Ice with Frus- trated Transverse Exchange: From a π-Flux Phase to a Nematic Quantum Spin Liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 067201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [1]

    J. S. Gardner, M. J. P. Gingras, and J. E. Greedan, Mag- netic pyrochlore oxides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 53 (2010)

    2010

  4. [2]

    J. G. Rau and M. J. Gingras, Frustrated Quantum Rare- Earth Pyrochlores, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 357 (2019)

    2019

  5. [3]

    J. E. Greedan, Frustrated rare earth magnetism: Spin glasses, spin liquids and spin ices in pyrochlore oxides, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 408-412, 444 (2006), proceedings of Rare Earths’04 in Nara, Japan

    work page 2006

  6. [4]

    M. J. P. Gingras and P. A. McClarty, Quantum spin ice: a search for gapless quantum spin liquids in py- rochlore magnets, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 056501 (2014)

    2014

  7. [5]

    K. A. Ross, L. Savary, B. D. Gaulin, and L. Balents, Quantum Excitations in Quantum Spin Ice, Phys. Rev. X 1, 021002 (2011)

    2011

  8. [6]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 016502 (2016)

    2016

Show all 82 references
  1. [7]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    2010

  2. [8]

    Castelnovo, R

    C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Magnetic monopoles in spin ice, Nature 451, 42 (2008)

    2008

  3. [9]

    A. P. Ramirez, A. Hayashi, R. J. Cava, R. Siddharthan, and B. S. Shastry, Zero-point entropy in ‘spin ice’, Nature 399, 333 (1999)

    1999

  4. [10]

    D. A. Huse, W. Krauth, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Coulomb and Liquid Dimer Models in Three Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 167004 (2003)

    2003

  5. [11]

    Benton, O

    O. Benton, O. Sikora, and N. Shannon, Seeing the light: Experimental signatures of emergent electromagnetism in a quantum spin ice, Phys. Rev. B 86, 075154 (2012)

    2012

  6. [12]

    Hermele, M

    M. Hermele, M. P. A. Fisher, and L. Balents, Pyrochlore photons: The U (1) spin liquid in a S = 1 2 three- dimensional frustrated magnet, Phys. Rev. B 69, 064404 (2004)

    2004

  7. [13]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Coulombic Quantum Liquids in Spin-1 /2 Pyrochlores, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 037202 (2012)

    2012

  8. [14]

    E. M. Smith, O. Benton, D. R. Yahne, B. Placke, R. Sch¨ afer, J. Gaudet, J. Dudemaine, A. Fitterman, J. Beare, A. R. Wildes, S. Bhattacharya, T. DeLazzer, C. R. C. Buhariwalla, N. P. Butch, R. Movshovich, J. D. Garrett, C. A. Marjerrison, J. P. Clancy, E. Kermarrec, G. M. Luke...

    2022

  9. [15]

    Bhardwaj, S

    A. Bhardwaj, S. Zhang, H. Yan, R. Moessner, A. H. Nevidomskyy, and H. J. Changlani, Sleuthing out ex- otic quantum spin liquidity in the pyrochlore magnet Ce2Zr2O7, npj Quantum Materials 7, 51 (2022)

    2022

  10. [16]

    D. R. Yahne, B. Placke, R. Sch¨ afer, O. Benton, R. Moess- ner, M. Powell, J. W. Kolis, C. M. Pasco, A. F. May, M. D. Frontzek, E. M. Smith, B. D. Gaulin, S. Calder, and K. A. Ross, Dipolar Spin Ice Regime Proximate to an All-In-All-Out N´ eel Ground State in the Dipolar-Octup...

    2024

  11. [17]

    Sibille, N

    R. Sibille, N. Gauthier, E. Lhotel, V. Por´ ee, V. Pom- jakushin, R. A. Ewings, T. G. Perring, J. Ollivier, A. Wildes, C. Ritter, T. C. Hansen, D. A. Keen, G. J. Nilsen, L. Keller, S. Petit, and T. Fennell, A quantum liquid of magnetic octupoles on the pyrochlore lattice, Natu...

    2020

  12. [18]

    B. Gao, T. Chen, D. W. Tam, C.-L. Huang, K. Sas- mal, D. T. Adroja, F. Ye, H. Cao, G. Sala, M. B. Stone, C. Baines, J. A. T. Verezhak, H. Hu, J.-H. Chung, X. Xu, S.-W. Cheong, M. Nallaiyan, S. Spagna, M. B. Maple, A. H. Nevidomskyy, E. Morosan, G. Chen, and P. Dai, Experimenta...

    2019

  13. [19]

    B. Gao, F. Desrochers, D. W. Tam, P. Steffens, A. Hiess, 14 Y. Su, S.-W. Cheong, Y. B. Kim, and P. Dai, Emergent photons and fractionalized excitations in a quantum spin liquid (2024), arXiv:2404.04207 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Clark, G

    L. Clark, G. J. Nilsen, E. Kermarrec, G. Ehlers, K. S. Knight, A. Harrison, J. P. Attfield, and B. D. Gaulin, From Spin Glass to Quantum Spin Liquid Ground States in Molybdate Pyrochlores, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 117201 (2014)

    2014

  15. [21]

    Iqbal, T

    Y. Iqbal, T. M¨ uller, K. Riedl, J. Reuther, S. Rachel, R. Valent ´ ı, M. J. P. Gingras, R. Thomale, and H. O. Jeschke, Signatures of a gearwheel quantum spin liquid in a spin- 1 2 pyrochlore molybdate Heisenberg antiferro- magnet, Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 071201 (2017)

    2017

  16. [22]

    Canals and C

    B. Canals and C. Lacroix, Pyrochlore Antiferromagnet: A Three-Dimensional Quantum Spin Liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2933 (1998)

    1998

  17. [24]

    Taillefumier, O

    M. Taillefumier, O. Benton, H. Yan, L. D. C. Jaubert, and N. Shannon, Competing Spin Liquids and Hidden Spin-Nematic Order in Spin Ice with Frustrated Trans- verse Exchange, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041057 (2017)

    2017

  18. [25]

    Huang, K

    Y. Huang, K. Chen, Y. Deng, N. Prokof’ev, and B. Svis- tunov, Spin-Ice State of the Quantum Heisenberg Anti- ferromagnet on the Pyrochlore Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 177203 (2016)

    2016

  19. [26]

    Hagym´ asi, R

    I. Hagym´ asi, R. Sch¨ afer, R. Moessner, and D. J. Luitz, Possible Inversion Symmetry Breaking in the S = 1 /2 Pyrochlore Heisenberg Magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 117204 (2021)

    2021

  20. [27]

    Tsunetsugu, Spin-singlet order in a pyrochlore anti- ferromagnet, Phys

    H. Tsunetsugu, Spin-singlet order in a pyrochlore anti- ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 65, 024415 (2001)

    2001

  21. [28]

    Isoda and S

    M. Isoda and S. Mori, Valence-Bond Crystal and Anisotropic Excitation Spectrum on 3-Dimensionally Frustrated Pyrochlore, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 67, 4022 (1998)

    1998

  22. [29]

    Iqbal, T

    Y. Iqbal, T. M¨ uller, P. Ghosh, M. J. P. Gingras, H. O. Jeschke, S. Rachel, J. Reuther, and R. Thomale, Quan- tum and Classical Phases of the Pyrochlore Heisenberg Model with Competing Interactions, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011005 (2019)

    2019

  23. [30]

    Niggemann, J

    N. Niggemann, J. Reuther, and B. Sbierski, Quantitative functional renormalization for three-dimensional quan- tum Heisenberg models, SciPost Phys. 12, 156 (2022)

    2022

  24. [31]

    A. B. Harris, A. J. Berlinsky, and C. Bruder, Ordering by quantum fluctuations in a strongly frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Journal of Applied Physics 69, 5200 (1991)

    1991

  25. [32]

    Sch¨ afer, B

    R. Sch¨ afer, B. Placke, O. Benton, and R. Moessner, Abundance of Hard-Hexagon Crystals in the Quan- tum Pyrochlore Antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 096702 (2023)

    2023

  26. [33]

    Kato and S

    Y. Kato and S. Onoda, Numerical Evidence of Quantum Melting of Spin Ice: Quantum-to-Classical Crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 077202 (2015)

    2015

  27. [34]

    Banerjee, S

    A. Banerjee, S. V. Isakov, K. Damle, and Y. B. Kim, Unusual Liquid State of Hard-Core Bosons on the Py- rochlore Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 047208 (2008)

    2008

  28. [35]

    Huang, C

    C.-J. Huang, C. Liu, Z. Meng, Y. Yu, Y. Deng, and G. Chen, Extended Coulomb liquid of paired hardcore boson model on a pyrochlore lattice, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 042022 (2020)

    2020

  29. [36]

    L. E. Chern, F. Desrochers, Y. B. Kim, and C. Castel- novo, Pseudofermion functional renormalization group study of dipolar-octupolar pyrochlore magnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 184421 (2024)

    2024

  30. [37]

    Niggemann, B

    N. Niggemann, B. Sbierski, and J. Reuther, Frustrated quantum spins at finite temperature: Pseudo-Majorana functional renormalization group approach, Phys. Rev. B 103, 104431 (2021)

    2021

  31. [38]

    M¨ uller, D

    T. M¨ uller, D. Kiese, N. Niggemann, B. Sbierski, J. Reuther, S. Trebst, R. Thomale, and Y. Iqbal, Pseudo- fermion functional renormalization group for spin mod- els, Reports on Progress in Physics 87, 036501 (2024)

    2024

  32. [39]

    Schneider, J

    B. Schneider, J. Reuther, M. G. Gonzalez, B. Sbier- ski, and N. Niggemann, Temperature flow in pseudo- Majorana functional renormalization for quantum spins, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195109 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    Niggemann, Y

    N. Niggemann, Y. Iqbal, and J. Reuther, Quantum Ef- fects on Unconventional Pinch Point Singularities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 196601 (2023)

    2023

  34. [41]

    Astrakhantsev, F

    N. Astrakhantsev, F. Ferrari, N. Niggemann, T. M¨ uller, A. Chauhan, A. Kshetrimayum, P. Ghosh, N. Regnault, R. Thomale, J. Reuther, T. Neupert, and Y. Iqbal, Pin- wheel valence bond crystal ground state of the spin- 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the shuriken lattice, Phys...

    2021

  35. [42]

    Niggemann, N

    N. Niggemann, N. Astrakhantsev, A. Ralko, F. Ferrari, A. Maity, T. M¨ uller, J. Richter, R. Thomale, T. Neupert, J. Reuther, Y. Iqbal, and H. O. Jeschke, Quantum para- magnetism in the decorated square-kagome antiferromag- net Na6Cu7BiO4(PO4)4Cl3, Phys. Rev. B 108, L241117 (2023)

    2023

  36. [43]

    Hagym´ asi, N

    I. Hagym´ asi, N. Niggemann, and J. Reuther, Phase diagram of the antiferromagnetic j1-j2 spin-1 py- rochlore heisenberg model (2024), arXiv:2405.12745 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Bippus, B

    F. Bippus, B. Schneider, and B. Sbierski, Pseudo- Majorana Functional Renormalization for Frustrated XXZ-Z Spin-1/2 Models (2024), arXiv:2411.18198 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Sbierski, M

    B. Sbierski, M. Bintz, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, N. Y. Yao, and L. Pollet, Magnetism in the two-dimensional dipolar XY model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 144411 (2024)

    2024

  39. [46]

    Noculak, D

    V. Noculak, D. Lozano-G´ omez, J. Oitmaa, R. R. P. Singh, Y. Iqbal, M. J. P. Gingras, and J. Reuther, Classi- cal and quantum phases of the pyrochlore S = 1 2 magnet with Heisenberg and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, Phys. Rev. B 107, 214414 (2023)

    2023

  40. [47]

    Lozano-G´ omez, V

    D. Lozano-G´ omez, V. Noculak, J. Oitmaa, R. R. P. Singh, Y. Iqbal, J. Reuther, and M. J. P. Gingras, Com- peting gauge fields and entropically driven spin liquid to spin liquid transition in non-Kramers pyrochlores, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121, e240348...

    2024

  41. [48]

    Hering, V

    M. Hering, V. Noculak, F. Ferrari, Y. Iqbal, and J. Reuther, Dimerization tendencies of the pyrochlore Heisenberg antiferromagnet: A functional renormaliza- tion group perspective, Phys. Rev. B 105, 054426 (2022)

    2022

  42. [49]

    Hagym´ asi, V

    I. Hagym´ asi, V. Noculak, and J. Reuther, Enhanced symmetry-breaking tendencies in the S = 1 pyrochlore antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 106, 235137 (2022)

    2022

  43. [50]

    Ghosh, Y

    P. Ghosh, Y. Iqbal, T. M¨ uller, R. T. Ponnaganti, R. Thomale, R. Narayanan, J. Reuther, M. J. P. Gin- gras, and H. O. Jeschke, Breathing chromium spinels: a 15 showcase for a variety of pyrochlore Heisenberg Hamilto- nians, npj Quantum Materials 4, 63 (2019)

    2019

  44. [51]

    Schneider, D

    B. Schneider, D. Kiese, and B. Sbierski, Taming pseud- ofermion functional renormalization for quantum spins: Finite temperatures and the Popov-Fedotov trick, Phys. Rev. B 106, 235113 (2022)

    2022

  45. [52]

    Astrakhantsev, T

    N. Astrakhantsev, T. Westerhout, A. Tiwari, K. Choo, A. Chen, M. H. Fischer, G. Carleo, and T. Neu- pert, Broken-Symmetry Ground States of the Heisen- berg Model on the Pyrochlore Lattice, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041021 (2021)

    2021

  46. [53]

    H. Yan, O. Benton, A. H. Nevidomskyy, and R. Moess- ner, Classification of classical spin liquids: Detailed for- malism and suite of examples, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174421 (2024)

    2024

  47. [54]

    M. J. Harris, S. T. Bramwell, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and J. D. M. Champion, Liquid-Gas Critical Behavior in a Frustrated Pyrochlore Ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 4496 (1998)

    1998

  48. [55]

    S. T. Bramwell and M. J. P. Gingras, Spin Ice State in Frustrated Magnetic Pyrochlore Materials, Science 294, 1495 (2001)

    2001

  49. [56]

    S. V. Isakov, K. Gregor, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, Dipolar Spin Correlations in Classical Pyrochlore Mag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 167204 (2004)

    2004

  50. [57]

    H. Yan, O. Benton, R. Moessner, and A. H. Nevidom- skyy, Classification of classical spin liquids: Typology and resulting landscape (2023), arXiv:2305.00155 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  51. [58]

    S. T. Bramwell, M. J. Harris, B. C. den Hertog, M. J. P. Gingras, J. S. Gardner, D. F. McMorrow, A. R. Wildes, A. L. Cornelius, J. D. M. Champion, R. G. Melko, and T. Fennell, Spin Correlations in Ho 2Ti2O7: A Dipolar Spin Ice System, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 047205 (2001)

    2001

  52. [59]

    M. J. Harris, S. T. Bramwell, D. F. McMorrow, T. Zeiske, and K. W. Godfrey, Geometrical Frustration in the Fer- romagnetic Pyrochlore Ho 2Ti2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2554 (1997)

    1997

  53. [60]

    J. Lago, S. J. Blundell, and C. Baines, µSR investiga- tion of spin dynamics in the spin-ice material Dy2Ti2O7, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 19, 326210 (2007)

    2007

  54. [61]

    Desrochers and Y

    F. Desrochers and Y. B. Kim, Spectroscopic Signatures of Fractionalization in Octupolar Quantum Spin Ice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 066502 (2024)

    2024

  55. [62]

    Sanders, H

    A. Sanders, H. Yan, C. Castelnovo, and A. H. Nev- idomskyy, Experimentally tunable QED in dipolar- octupolar quantum spin ice (2024), arXiv:2312.11641 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Takatsu, S

    H. Takatsu, S. Onoda, S. Kittaka, A. Kasahara, Y. Kono, T. Sakakibara, Y. Kato, B. F ˚ ak, J. Ollivier, J. W. Lynn, T. Taniguchi, M. Wakita, and H. Kadowaki, Quadrupole Order in the Frustrated Pyrochlore Tb 2+xTi2−xO7+y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 217201 (2016)

    2016

  57. [64]

    Onoda and Y

    S. Onoda and Y. Tanaka, Quantum fluctuations in the effective pseudospin- 1 2 model for magnetic pyrochlore ox- ides, Phys. Rev. B 83, 094411 (2011)

    2011

  58. [65]

    K. T. K. Chung, Mapping the Phase Diagram of a Frustrated Magnet: Degeneracies, Flat Bands, and Canting Cycles on the Pyrochlore Lattice (2024), arXiv:2411.03429 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Lozano-G´ omez, O

    D. Lozano-G´ omez, O. Benton, M. J. P. Gingras, and H. Yan, An Atlas of Classical Pyrochlore Spin Liquids (2024), arXiv:2411.03547 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  60. [67]

    Benton, Ground-state phase diagram of dipolar- octupolar pyrochlores, Phys

    O. Benton, Ground-state phase diagram of dipolar- octupolar pyrochlores, Phys. Rev. B 102, 104408 (2020)

    2020

  61. [68]

    Pohle, Y

    R. Pohle, Y. Yamaji, and M. Imada, Ground state of the S=1/2 pyrochlore Heisenberg antiferromagnet: A quantum spin liquid emergent from dimensional reduc- tion (2023), arXiv:2311.11561 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Moessner and J

    R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Low-temperature prop- erties of classical geometrically frustrated antiferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. B 58, 12049 (1998)

    1998

  63. [70]

    Moessner and J

    R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Properties of a Classical Spin Liquid: The Heisenberg Pyrochlore Antiferromag- net, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2929 (1998)

    1998

  64. [71]

    A. M. Tsvelik, New fermionic description of quantum spin liquid state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2142 (1992)

    1992

  65. [72]

    Schaden and J

    Y. Schaden and J. Reuther, Bilinear Majorana represen- tations for spin operators with spin magnitudes S >1/2, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023067 (2023)

    2023

  66. [73]

    Reuther and P

    J. Reuther and P. W¨ olfle, J1−J2 frustrated two- dimensional Heisenberg model: Random phase approxi- mation and functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 81, 144410 (2010)

    2010

  67. [74]

    Metzner, M

    W. Metzner, M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, V. Meden, and K. Sch¨ onhammer, Functional renormalization group approach to correlated fermion systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 299 (2012)

    2012

  68. [75]

    A. A. Katanin, Fulfillment of Ward identities in the func- tional renormalization group approach, Phys. Rev. B 70, 115109 (2004)

    2004

  69. [76]

    A. W. Sandvik, Computational Studies of Quantum Spin Systems, AIP Conference Proceedings 1297, 135 (2010)

    2010

  70. [77]

    Kele¸ s and E

    A. Kele¸ s and E. Zhao, Rise and fall of plaquette order in the Shastry-Sutherland magnet revealed by pseud- ofermion functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. B 105, L041115 (2022)

    2022

  71. [78]

    Iqbal, R

    Y. Iqbal, R. Thomale, F. Parisen Toldin, S. Rachel, and J. Reuther, Functional renormalization group for three-dimensional quantum magnetism, Phys. Rev. B94, 140408 (2016)

    2016

  72. [79]

    Iqbal, P

    Y. Iqbal, P. Ghosh, R. Narayanan, B. Kumar, J. Reuther, and R. Thomale, Intertwined nematic orders in a frus- trated ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 94, 224403 (2016)

    2016

  73. [80]

    J. D. Alzate-Cardona, D. Sabogal-Su´ arez, R. F. L. Evans, and E. Restrepo-Parra, Optimal phase space sampling for Monte Carlo simulations of Heisenberg spin systems, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 31, 095802 (2019)

    2019

  74. [82]

    M¨ uller, A

    P. M¨ uller, A. Lohmann, J. Richter, O. Menchyshyn, and O. Derzhko, Thermodynamics of the pyrochlore Heisen- berg ferromagnet with arbitrary spin S, Phys. Rev. B 96, 174419 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.