Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 88 references

Deep view of the intracluster light in the Coma cluster of galaxies

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Deep optical images map the intracluster light of Coma out to 1.5 Mpc and reveal a faint stellar bridge linking the cluster core to NGC 4839, showing this galaxy has already crossed the cluster center and is falling back in a second infall.

desk verdict Solid ICL measurement and a genuinely new bridge candidate, but the headline claim is a 2-sigma feature and the sky subtraction needs an explicit test. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15328 v1 pith:7KHI4RDB submitted 2024-12-19 astro-ph.GA

Yolanda Jiménez-Teja , Javier Román , Kim HyeongHan , Jose M. Vílchez , Renato A. Dupke , Paulo Afrânio Augusto Lopes , Robert Michael Rich , Osmin Caceres
show 1 more author
Chester Li
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords intraclusterlightComaclusterlowsurfacebrightnessgalaxydynamicsNGC4839stellarbridgegroupsmergers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses the deepest optical images yet taken of the Coma cluster to map its intracluster light, the diffuse glow of stars that are not bound to any single galaxy. It finds that this light is clumpy and filamentary, spreading over 1.5 Mpc from the cluster core, and that it connects many of the 42 galaxy subgroups identified from 2,157 spectroscopic members. The headline result is a faint stellar bridge between the cluster core and the galaxy NGC 4839, which the authors take as evidence that this galaxy has already passed through the cluster center and is now on a second infall. They also measure intracluster light fractions of roughly 20 percent in both the g and r bands, placing Coma among dynamically active, merging clusters rather than relaxed ones. If correct, this shows that even a massive, seemingly mature cluster is still assembling through ongoing mergers and that intracluster light preserves a record of those encounters.

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on the CICLE algorithm, which decomposes every detected galaxy's light with Chebyshev rational functions and Fourier series and subtracts it, leaving only intracluster light and background; the background is then estimated with NoiseChisel. Before coadding, individual exposures are sky-subtracted with Zernike polynomials (orders 2 through 4), and the brightest stars are modeled and removed. Cluster membership comes from combining DESI Early Data Release spectra with NED and SDSS compilations, refined by the caustic technique, and groups are identified with the DS+ algorithm. The faint bridge is measured by averaging surface brightness in contiguous boxes oriented perpendicular to its axis and comparing with limiting-depth maps.

What would settle it

Re-compute the ICL map after replacing the Zernike polynomial sky subtraction with an independent background estimator, such as a median-filtered large-scale background. If the faint bridge between the Coma core and NGC 4839 disappears or falls below about 1σ, while the overall ICL fractions change by more than the quoted errors, then the second-infall interpretation loses its observational anchor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a faint stellar bridge of intracluster light connecting the main ICL cloud around Coma's two brightest galaxies, NGC 4874 and NGC 4889, with the intragroup light of NGC 4839. Its average surface brightness is about 28.5 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ in g and 29.2 in r, with correlated significances of 2.0σ and 2.1σ. The bridge coincides in projection with a faint X-ray bridge and a low-surface-brightness radio bridge found previously. The authors interpret this, together with the bluer, more diffuse northeastern intragroup light of NGC 4839 and its redder, sharper southwestern side, as the trail of stars stripped during a first core passage, placing NGC 4839 on a second infall. The paper also reports ICL fractions of 19.9±0.5% (g) and 19.6±0.6% (r), among the highest measured for Coma, and maps ICL out to ~1.5 Mpc from the core, making this the largest ICL map of an individual cluster to date.

Load-bearing premise

The entire measurement assumes that the low-order Zernike polynomials used to subtract the sky in each exposure remove only atmospheric and instrumental gradients, not the smooth, large-scale intracluster light that has the same angular size as the whole field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The measured ICL fractions of about 20 percent in g and r place Coma in the merging-cluster regime, reinforcing the view that it is far from virialized.
  • The detection of the stellar bridge puts NGC 4839's first core passage within roughly the last 1.2 Gyr (assuming A- and F-type star ages), consistent with the ~1.6 Gyr estimate from globular cluster studies.
  • The filamentary ICL network traces the same structures as the weak-lensing and X-ray maps, indicating that intracluster light is a reliable tracer of ongoing infall and preprocessing.
  • Groups around NGC 4921 and NGC 4911 show different ICL morphologies and velocity dispersions, suggesting they are at different dynamical stages and illustrating how ICL carries a record of group-scale encounters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: The Zernike sky-subtraction step is the likeliest source of systematic error; re-deriving the ICL maps with an independent sky model (e.g., a large-kernel median filter) would show whether the ~20 percent fractions and the NGC 4839 bridge are robust to that choice.
  • Inference: The same CICLE-plus-caustic pipeline, applied to other clusters with comparable depth (e.g., Virgo or Fornax), could test whether bright ICL bridges like the one to NGC 4839 are a generic signpost of groups on second infall, or a peculiarity of Coma.
  • Inference: If the bridge is genuinely stellar, it should be spatially coincident with a population of intracluster planetary nebulae or red-giant stars whose radial velocities lie between the cluster mean and NGC 4839's velocity; a targeted IFU or narrow-band survey along the bridge would provide a direct kinematic confirmation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents deep g- and r-band HERON images of the Coma cluster, applies the CICLE algorithm to remove galaxy light and produce intracluster light (ICL) maps, and combines DESI EDR, SDSS, NED, and literature redshifts to define 2,157 cluster members and 42 DS+ groups. The authors derive ICL fractions of 19.9 +/- 0.5% (g) and 19.6 +/- 0.6% (r), identify a filamentary ICL network, and report a faint stellar bridge between the cluster core and NGC 4839 with average surface brightness ~28.5 and ~29.2 mag arcsec^-2 at 2.0 sigma and 2.1 sigma correlated significance. They interpret this bridge, together with ICL color asymmetries and an assumed A/F-star age, as evidence that NGC 4839 has already crossed the cluster core.

Significance. If the bridge and the ICL fractions hold, the paper constitutes a valuable deep view of ICL in a single nearby cluster, extending to ~1.5 Mpc and connecting ICL morphology to X-ray, radio, and weak-lensing structures. The analysis has real strengths: CICLE was benchmarked in the independent Brough et al. (2024) blind challenge, and the ICL fraction errors include photometric, geometric, and spectroscopic-incompleteness contributions propagated in a documented way. However, the central dynamical claim currently rests on a 2-sigma feature whose survival against low-order Zernike sky subtraction is not quantified, so the abstract's 'compelling evidence' wording is not supported. With a quantitative sky-subtraction test and appropriately hedged conclusions, the paper would be a solid contribution to the study of cluster assembly.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sect. 2.1 (affects all ICL results)] The sky subtraction fits Zernike polynomials of order 2, with some exposures using orders up to 4, after masking discrete sources. The ICL is a smooth, large-scale component with spatial scales comparable to the 56.6-arcmin field, so these low-order polynomials can in principle absorb a substantial fraction of the ICL flux. The paper does not provide a quantitative test of this loss; the stated safeguard is visual inspection for residual gradients, which is not a calibration. Because the ICL fractions (Table 2), the filamentary network (Figs. 2 and 7), and the NGC 4839 bridge (Fig. 8) all come from the same maps, this systematic affects every headline result. Please add a test that injects a known ICL model into the individual exposures and recovers it through the full sky-subtraction and CICLE pipeline, or an equivalent comparison (for example, a constant or linear sky fit) that bounds the ICL flux loss as a function of spatial scale.
  2. [Sect. 4.4 and Abstract] The bridge is detected at 2.0 sigma (g) and 2.1 sigma (r) in correlated boxes (Fig. 8), yet the Abstract calls it 'compelling evidence' that NGC 4839 has already traversed the cluster core. The description of these values as 'correlated significance' is not defined; if the boxes are not independent, the effective significance is even lower. Even before considering the sky-subtraction systematic above, a 2-sigma feature is a candidate detection, not a compelling one. The spatial coincidence with the X-ray and radio bridges is suggestive but does not by itself establish a stellar bridge, since projection along the same line of sight is plausible. Please either temper the wording in the Abstract, Sect. 4.4, and Conclusions, or add independent confirmation of the stellar bridge.
  3. [Sect. 4.4] The inference that NGC 4839 crossed the core less than ~1.2 Gyr ago depends on two assumed quantities: an average age of ~2.3 Gyr for the stripped A- and F-type stars (Salpeter IMF) and the assumption that these stars were stripped halfway through their lifetimes. No uncertainty or sensitivity analysis is provided for either assumption, and the language 'must have crossed' is stronger than these inputs can support. Please provide a plausible range from different IMF or stellar-age choices, or state explicitly that this is an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than a precise crossing time.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sect. 2.1 and Table 2] The r-band limiting surface brightness is given as 29.8 mag arcsec^-2 in the text of Sect. 2.1, but as 29.6 mag arcsec^-2 in the Abstract and Table 2; please reconcile these values.
  2. [Sect. 4.4 and Fig. 8] The text says the bridge profile is measured in boxes whose main axis is perpendicular to the bridge, while the Fig. 8 caption says the boxes are parallel to the main axis; one of these descriptions is incorrect and should be fixed.
  3. [Sect. 4.2] There are recurring typographical errors 'NCG 4889' and 'NGG 4874' in this section; these should be 'NGC 4889' and 'NGC 4874'.
  4. [Sect. 3.1] The in-text citation 'SExtractor (Bertin & Arnouts 2010)' appears in Sect. 3.1, while Sect. 2.1 cites Bertin & Arnouts 1996; please use consistent citation years and update the reference list accordingly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the ICL maps, fractions, and NGC 4839 bridge are image-derived measurements benchmarked externally, with no equation-level reduction to the conclusions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the paper's headline claims. The ICL maps are produced by CICLE, whose accuracy is checked against simulations ('Testing CICLE against simulations, we found that this transition was calculated with high precision, yielding a maximum error of 1%') and against an external blind challenge (Brough et al. 2024) with independent simulator-side truth; this is real external evidence under the review rules. The ICL fractions (19.9% and 19.6%) are ratios of measured ICL flux to measured galaxy plus ICL flux within the detected region, not fits to the dynamical-state conclusion. Membership (2,157 galaxies) comes from DESI, NED, and SDSS redshifts processed with the caustic technique, and the 42 groups come from DS+, both independent of the ICL maps. The NGC 4839 bridge is a direct surface-brightness measurement ('The average surface brightness of the bridge is ~28.5 and 29.2 mag arcsec^-2 in the g and r bands, respectively... This corresponds to a correlated significance of 2.0 sigma and 2.1 sigma'), not the output of a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The post-core-passage inference uses the bridge together with prior X-ray and radio bridges (Churazov et al. 2021; Bonafede et al. 2021) and an explicit, stated age assumption for A/F stars from prior work ('if we assume that these stars were stripped halfway through their lifetimes and also assuming an average age for these stellar types of ~2.3 Gyr... then NGC 4839 must have crossed the core of Coma less than ~1.2 Gyr ago'); those are external inputs and stated assumptions, not consequences derived from the conclusion itself. The main caveats are statistical and systematic rather than circular: a 2.0-2.1 sigma correlated detection, and the untested possibility that low-order Zernike sky subtraction (orders 2 to 4) removes large-scale ICL on scales comparable to the field of view. These are correctness risks and would support softening 'compelling evidence' in the abstract, but they are not instances of a prediction reducing by construction to an input, and no equation in the paper equates the bridge or the ICL fraction to an assumed answer.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central ICL measurement depends on the definition of ICL via CICLE galaxy subtraction and on a sky subtraction that must not remove large-scale signal; these are domain assumptions. The NGC 4839 crossing-time inference adds ad hoc assumptions about stellar ages and stripping epoch. No genuinely new physical entities are introduced, and no numbers are fitted to force the conclusions.

free parameters (2)
  • Average age of stripped A/F-type stars = 2.3 Gyr
    Assumed to estimate the crossing time of NGC 4839 (Sect. 4.4); taken from prior work, not fitted to Coma data. The derived less than 1.2 Gyr since core passage scales linearly with this age.
  • Stripping epoch fraction of stellar lifetime = 0.5 (halfway through lifetime)
    Assumed in Sect. 4.4 to convert the A/F star age into a crossing time; no supporting measurement is provided in this paper.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Zernike low-order (2 to 4) sky subtraction removes sky gradients without removing large-scale ICL.
    Invoked in Sect. 2.1; if false, the ICL maps and fractions are biased. No quantitative test is provided.
  • domain assumption The BCG-ICL boundary is identified by the curvature map, and CICLE's galaxy subtraction isolates ICL.
    Sect. 3.1; supported by simulations with about 1 percent error and the Brough et al. 2024 blind challenge, but still a model-dependent definition of ICL.
  • domain assumption DESI EDR BGS is 98.5 percent complete to r < 20.175 in the Coma region, and the missing light can be approximated by the median observed target flux.
    Sect. 3.4; the paper acknowledges crowding may reduce completeness below this bound.
  • ad hoc to paper A- and F-type stars are stripped halfway through their lifetimes, with an average age of 2.3 Gyr (Salpeter IMF).
    Sect. 4.4; this assumption converts the observed IE into a crossing time. It is borrowed from Jimenez-Teja et al. 2019 and not independently calibrated here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deep view of the intracluster light in the Coma cluster of galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7KHI4RDB

@misc{pith2026241215328,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deep view of the intracluster light in the Coma cluster of galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7KHI4RDB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15328}
}
abstract

Detection and study of the intracluster light in rich clusters of galaxies has been a problem of long standing challenge and interest. Using the lowest surface brightness images of the Coma cluster of galaxies in the g and r bands, from the Halos and Environment of Nearby Galaxies (HERON) Coma Cluster Project, we obtained the most extensive image of intracluster light (ICL) in a single cluster to date, spreading over 1.5 Mpc from the cluster core. The unprecedented wealth of spectroscopic data made publicly available by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Early Data Release, complemented with a compilation from the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database and the literature, enabled the identification of 2,157 galaxy members within Coma, from which 42 distinct groups were identified. The synergy between these high-quality data allowed us to: 1) calculate ICL fractions of $19.9\pm0.5$\% and $19.6\pm0.6$\% in the g and r bands, respectively, consistent with a dynamically active cluster, 2) unveil Coma's faintest tidal features, and 3) provide a comprehensive picture of the dynamics and interactions within this complex system. Our findings indicate that the ICL connects several of these groups in a filamentous network, from which we infer the ongoing dynamical processes. In particular, we identified a faint stellar bridge linking the core of Coma with the galaxy NGC 4839, providing compelling evidence that this galaxy has already traversed the central region of the cluster.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15328 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. False color image of the HERON Coma field. Some of the brightest galaxies in the field are indicated in blue. At Coma’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. 3.3. Identification of substructures Identifying (infalling) groups in clusters is essential to get a complete picture of the processes that govern the ICL formation, because these are possible sites of galaxy pre-processing and in-turns of intergalactic material and tidal dwarf galaxies, all channels of ICL injection. This is clearly exemplified by the neighboring cluster Abell 1367 (Gavazzi et al. 2003). The unpre… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. False color image of the ICL in the region showed in Fig. 1. The background is the composite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Phase-space diagram for all galaxies in a rectangular re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: False color image of the Coma cluster of galaxies. The image shows the ICL and the galaxies spectroscopically classified as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spatial distribution of the groups identified in Coma. Left: weak lensing mass of Coma (courtesy of HyeongHan et al. 2024, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ICL fractions measured for two samples of clusters at dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Composite g + r ICL map, threshold segmented to facilitate the visualization of the ICL. The main contours of the ICL (blue) and X-ray (red) distributions are overplotted. The ICL contours were computed from the original ICL map, just applying a binning of 4 × 4 pixels…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Surface brightness profile along the bridge. Measure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1909.11230

    Akhlaghi, M. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1909.11230

    arXiv 2019

  2. [2]

    & Ichikawa, T

    Akhlaghi, M. & Ichikawa, T. 2015, ApJS, 220, 1

    2015

  3. [3]

    D., Allende Prieto, C., Almeida, A., et al

    Albareti, F. D., Allende Prieto, C., Almeida, A., et al. 2017, ApJS, 233, 25

    2017

  4. [4]

    & Gerhard, O

    Arnaboldi, M. & Gerhard, O. 2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 403

    2022

  5. [5]

    2001, A&A, 365, L67

    Arnaud, M., Aghanim, N., Gastaud, R., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L67

    2001

  6. [6]

    Barfety, C., Valin, F.-A., Webb, T. M. A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 25

    2022

  7. [7]

    C., Flynn, K., & Gebhardt, K

    Beers, T. C., Flynn, K., & Gebhardt, K. 1990, AJ, 100, 32

    1990

  8. [8]

    G., & van der Hulst, T

    Beijersbergen, M., Hoekstra, H., van Dokkum, P. G., & van der Hulst, T. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 385

    2002

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    A., Biviano, A., & Abadi, M

    Benavides, J. A., Biviano, A., & Abadi, M. G. 2023, A&A, 669, A147

    2023

  2. [10]

    2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Bertin, E. 2006, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 351, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV , ed. C. Gabriel, C. Arviset, D. Ponz, & S. Enrique, 112

    2006

  3. [11]

    & Arnouts, S

    Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393

    1996

  4. [12]

    & Arnouts, S

    Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. 2010, SExtractor: Source Extractor, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1010.064

    2010

  5. [13]

    R., Bershady, M

    Blanton, M. R., Bershady, M. A., Abolfathi, B., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 28

    2017

  6. [14]

    2021, ApJ, 907, 32

    Bonafede, A., Brunetti, G., Vazza, F., et al. 2021, ApJ, 907, 32

    2021

  7. [15]

    G., Henry, J

    Briel, U. G., Henry, J. P., & Boehringer, H. 1992, A&A, 259, L31

    1992

  8. [16]

    G., Henry, J

    Briel, U. G., Henry, J. P., Lumb, D. H., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L60

    2001

  9. [17]

    L., Bahé, Y

    Brough, S., Ahad, S. L., Bahé, Y . M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 771

    2024

  10. [18]

    & Rudnick, L

    Brown, S. & Rudnick, L. 2011, MNRAS, 412, 2

    2011

  11. [19]

    M., Lyskova, N., & Sunyaev, R

    Churazov, E., Khabibullin, I., Bykov, A. M., Lyskova, N., & Sunyaev, R. 2023, A&A, 670, A156

    2023

  12. [20]

    Churazov, E., Khabibullin, I., Lyskova, N., Sunyaev, R., & Bykov, A. M. 2021, A&A, 651, A41

    2021

  13. [21]

    & Dunn, A

    Colless, M. & Dunn, A. M. 1996, ApJ, 458, 435

    1996

  14. [22]

    2021, Galaxies, 9, 60

    Contini, E. 2021, Galaxies, 9, 60

    2021

  15. [23]

    K., & Jeon, S

    Contini, E., Yi, S. K., & Jeon, S. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.01560

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Davis, D. S. & Mushotzky, R. F. 1993, AJ, 105, 409 de Oliveira, N. O. L., Jiménez-Teja, Y ., & Dupke, R. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 1916

    1993

  17. [25]

    M., Reich, W., Lesch, H., & Wielebinski, R

    Deiss, B. M., Reich, W., Lesch, H., & Wielebinski, R. 1997, A&A, 321, 55

    1997

  18. [26]

    H., Zabludoff, A., et al

    DeMaio, T., Gonzalez, A. H., Zabludoff, A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 3009 DESI Collaboration, Abareshi, B., Aguilar, J., et al. 2022, AJ, 164, 207 DESI Collaboration, Adame, A. G., Aguilar, J., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 58

    2018

  19. [27]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168

    2019

  20. [28]

    1999, MNRAS, 309, 610

    Diaferio, A. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 610

    1999

  21. [29]

    & Geller, M

    Diaferio, A. & Geller, M. J. 1997, ApJ, 481, 633

    1997

  22. [30]

    & Shectman, S

    Dressler, A. & Shectman, S. A. 1988, AJ, 95, 985

    1988

  23. [31]

    A., Jimenez-teja, Y ., Su, Y ., et al

    Dupke, R. A., Jimenez-teja, Y ., Su, Y ., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.00603

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    C., Stewart, G

    Edge, A. C., Stewart, G. C., & Fabian, A. C. 1992, MNRAS, 258, 177

    1992

  25. [33]

    2019, A&A, 628, A34

    Ellien, A., Durret, F., Adami, C., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A34

    2019

  26. [34]

    & Webster, R

    Fitchett, M. & Webster, R. 1987, ApJ, 317, 653

    1987

  27. [35]

    2003, ApJ, 597, 210

    Gavazzi, G., Cortese, L., Boselli, A., et al. 2003, ApJ, 597, 210

    2003

  28. [36]

    2009, A&A, 498, L33

    Gavazzi, R., Adami, C., Durret, F., et al. 2009, A&A, 498, L33

    2009

  29. [37]

    C., et al

    Gerhard, O., Arnaboldi, M., Freeman, K. C., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 815

    2007

  30. [38]

    1985, A&A, 150, 302

    Giovannini, G., Feretti, L., & Andernach, H. 1985, A&A, 150, 302

    1985

  31. [39]

    1993, ApJ, 404, 38

    Girardi, M., Biviano, A., Giuricin, G., Mardirossian, F., & Mezzetti, M. 1993, ApJ, 404, 38

    1993

  32. [40]

    H., George, T., Connor, T., et al

    Gonzalez, A. H., George, T., Connor, T., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 963 Górski, K. M., Hivon, E., Banday, A. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 622, 759

    2021

  33. [41]

    2020, ApJ, 894, 32

    Gu, M., Conroy, C., Law, D., et al. 2020, ApJ, 894, 32

    2020

  34. [42]

    J., Ruiz-Macias, O., et al

    Hahn, C., Wilson, M. J., Ruiz-Macias, O., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 253

    2023

  35. [43]

    L., Verheijen, M

    Healy, J., Blyth, S. L., Verheijen, M. A. W., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, A76

    2021

  36. [44]

    M., et al

    Ho, M., Ntampaka, M., Rau, M. M., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 936

    2022

  37. [45]

    J., Cha, S., & Cho, H

    HyeongHan, K., Jee, M. J., Cha, S., & Cho, H. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 377 Iglesias-Páramo, J., Boselli, A., Cortese, L., Vílchez, J. M., & Gavazzi, G. 2002, A&A, 384, 383

    2024

  38. [46]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 5317

    Infante-Sainz, R., Trujillo, I., & Román, J. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 5317

    2020

  39. [47]

    2017, ApJ, 851, 75

    Iodice, E., Spavone, M., Cantiello, M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, 75

    2017

  40. [48]

    J., Perola, G

    Jaffe, W. J., Perola, G. C., & Valentijn, E. A. 1976, A&A, 49, 179 Jiménez-Teja, Y . & Benítez, N. 2012, ApJ, 745, 150 Jiménez-Teja, Y . & Dupke, R. 2016, ApJ, 820, 49 Jiménez-Teja, Y ., Dupke, R., Benítez, N., et al. 2018, ApJ, 857, 79 Jiménez-Teja, Y ., Dupke, R. A., Lopes, ...

    1976

  41. [49]

    W., Cruddace, R

    Johnson, M. W., Cruddace, R. G., Fritz, G., Shulman, S., & Friedman, H. 1979, ApJ, 231, L45

    1979

  42. [50]

    & Jee, M

    Joo, H. & Jee, M. J. 2023, Nature, 613, 37

    2023

  43. [51]

    1987, MNRAS, 227, 1

    Kaiser, N. 1987, MNRAS, 227, 1

    1987

  44. [52]

    S., Song, H., et al

    Kang, W., Hwang, H. S., Song, H., et al. 2024, ApJS, 272, 22

    2024

  45. [53]

    Kent, S. M. & Gunn, J. E. 1982, AJ, 87, 945

    1982

  46. [54]

    L., et al

    Kim, D., Sheen, Y .-K., Jaffé, Y . L., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 124

    2024

  47. [55]

    T., Kronberg, P

    Kim, K. T., Kronberg, P. P., Dewdney, P. E., & Landecker, T. L. 1990, ApJ, 355, 29

    1990

  48. [56]

    2021, ApJS, 252, 27

    Kluge, M., Bender, R., Riffeser, A., et al. 2021, ApJS, 252, 27

    2021

  49. [57]

    P., Kothes, R., Salter, C

    Kronberg, P. P., Kothes, R., Salter, C. J., & Perillat, P. 2007, ApJ, 659, 267

    2007

  50. [58]

    V ., Lyskova, N., Zhang, C., et al

    Lal, D. V ., Lyskova, N., Zhang, C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 934, 170

    2022

  51. [59]

    W., Mierle, K., Blanton, M., & Roweis, S

    Lang, D., Hogg, D. W., Mierle, K., Blanton, M., & Roweis, S. 2010, AJ, 139, 1782

    2010

  52. [60]

    D., et al

    Lasker, J., Carnero Rosell, A., Myers, A. D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.03006 Łokas, E. L. & Mamon, G. A. 2003, MNRAS, 343, 401

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    2019, MNRAS, 485, 2922

    Lyskova, N., Churazov, E., Zhang, C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 2922

    2019

  54. [62]

    S., Sarrouh, G

    Martis, N. S., Sarrouh, G. T. E., Willott, C. J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 76

    2024

  55. [63]

    1988, A&A, 199, 67

    Mellier, Y ., Mathez, G., Mazure, A., Chauvineau, B., & Proust, D. 1988, A&A, 199, 67

    1988

  56. [64]

    Melnick, J., White, S. D. M., & Hoessel, J. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 207

    1977

  57. [65]

    1987, ApJ, 313, 121

    Merritt, D. 1987, ApJ, 313, 121

    1987

  58. [66]

    C., Harding, P., Feldmeier, J., & Morrison, H

    Mihos, J. C., Harding, P., Feldmeier, J., & Morrison, H. 2005, ApJ, 631, L41

    2005

  59. [67]

    C., Harding, P., Feldmeier, J

    Mihos, J. C., Harding, P., Feldmeier, J. J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 16

    2017

  60. [68]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 308 Müller, O., Rich, R

    Montes, M. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 308 Müller, O., Rich, R. M., Román, J., et al. 2019, A&A, 624, L6

    2022

  61. [69]

    M., Arnaud, M., Gastaud, R., et al

    Neumann, D. M., Arnaud, M., Gastaud, R., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L74

    2001

  62. [70]

    M., Lumb, D

    Neumann, D. M., Lumb, D. H., Pratt, G. W., & Briel, U. G. 2003, A&A, 400, 811

    2003

  63. [71]

    G., & Jang, I

    Oh, S.-A., Lee, M. G., & Jang, I. S. 2023, ApJ, 944, 51

    2023

  64. [72]

    2010, MNRAS, 406, 936

    Puchwein, E., Springel, V ., Sijacki, D., & Dolag, K. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 936

    2010

  65. [73]

    & Geller, M

    Regos, E. & Geller, M. J. 1989, AJ, 98, 755

    1989

  66. [74]

    M., Brosch, N., Bullock, J., et al

    Rich, R. M., Brosch, N., Bullock, J., et al. 2017, in Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Outskirts, ed. A. Gil de Paz, J. H. Knapen, & J. C. Lee, V ol. 321, 186–189

    2017

  67. [75]

    M., Collins, M

    Rich, R. M., Collins, M. L. M., Black, C. M., et al. 2012, Nature, 482, 192

    2012

  68. [76]

    M., Mosenkov, A., Lee-Saunders, H., et al

    Rich, R. M., Mosenkov, A., Lee-Saunders, H., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 1539 Román, J., Rich, R. M., Ahvazi, N., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A157 Román, J., Trujillo, I., & Montes, M. 2020, A&A, 644, A42

    2019

  69. [77]

    S., Mihos, J

    Rudick, C. S., Mihos, J. C., & McBride, C. 2006, ApJ, 648, 936

    2006

  70. [78]

    & Gerbal, D

    Serna, A. & Gerbal, D. 1996, A&A, 309, 65

    1996

  71. [79]

    Serra, A. L. & Diaferio, A. 2013, ApJ, 768, 116

    2013

  72. [80]

    2013, ApJ, 775, 4

    Simionescu, A., Werner, N., Urban, O., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 4

    2013

  73. [81]

    S., et al

    Spavone, M., Iodice, E., Lohmann, F. S., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A306

    2024

  74. [82]

    2010, ApJ, 708, 946

    Sun, M., Donahue, M., Roediger, E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 708, 946

    2010

  75. [83]

    1990, AJ, 99, 1381

    Venturi, T., Giovannini, G., & Feretti, L. 1990, AJ, 99, 1381

    1990

  76. [84]

    1997, ApJ, 474, L7

    Vikhlinin, A., Forman, W., & Jones, C. 1997, ApJ, 474, L7

    1997

  77. [85]

    P., Ponman, T

    Watt, M. P., Ponman, T. J., Bertram, D., et al. 1992, MNRAS, 258, 738

    1992

  78. [86]

    White, S. D. M., Briel, U. G., & Henry, J. P. 1993, MNRAS, 261, L8

    1993

  79. [87]

    Willson, M. A. G. 1970, MNRAS, 151, 1 Zernike, v. F. 1934, Physica, 1, 689

    1970

  80. [88]

    2019, ApJ, 874, 165 Article number, page 15 of 16 A&A proofs: manuscript no

    Zhang, Y ., Yanny, B., Palmese, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 165 Article number, page 15 of 16 A&A proofs: manuscript no. main Appendix A: Coma catalog We list in Table A.1 the cluster member galaxies identified by the caustic technique (see Sect. 3.2). Table A.1: Catalog of Com...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.