Pullback measure attractors and limiting behaviors of McKean-Vlasov stochastic delay lattice systems

Jun Shen; Kening Lu; Lin Shi

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Pullback measure attractors and limiting behaviors of McKean-Vlasov stochastic delay lattice systems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Under large damping, the law of the solution segment of a McKean-Vlasov stochastic delay lattice system has a unique pullback measure attractor; extra damping makes it a singleton and gives exponential mixing.

desk verdict Useful extension with a real gap: the tightness proof in Lemma 5.3 does not establish compactness, so the main attractor theorem is currently unproved. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15528 v1 pith:SIROTQOU submitted 2024-12-20 math.DS

Lin Shi , Jun Shen , Kening Lu This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DS MSC 60H1537L5537L3035R60

keywords McKean-Vlasovequationpullbackmeasureattractorstochasticdelaylatticesystemuppersemicontinuitytail-endsestimateinvariantexponentialmixingWassersteindistance

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the long-term statistical behavior of an infinite lattice of stochastic equations in which each coordinate depends on its own past value and on the probability distribution of its current value. The authors prove that, under a large-damping condition, the family of probability laws of solution segments defines a non-autonomous dynamical system with a unique pullback measure attractor: a compact, invariant, time-dependent family of distributions that attracts every suitably bounded family of initial laws. With a stronger damping condition, the attractor collapses to a single law, and in the time-homogeneous case there is a unique invariant measure to which every other law converges exponentially in Wasserstein distance. The paper also shows that the attractors are upper semi-continuous as the distribution-dependent coefficients converge to distribution-independent ones. The significance is that even though McKean-Vlasov equations do not generate Markov semigroups, the system still has a well-defined statistical long-time limit with exponential mixing.

What carries the argument

The central object is the law-evolution semigroup $P^*_{\tau,t}\mu = \mathcal{L}u_t(\cdot,\tau,\mu)$, which is well defined by weak uniqueness, and the non-autonomous dynamical system $\Phi(t,\tau)=P^*_{\tau,\tau+t}$ acting on probability measures rather than paths. The argument runs through four mechanisms: Itô-formula weighted energy estimates with exponential weights $e^{\varepsilon(s-\tau)}$; uniform tail-end estimates with cutoff functions $\theta_n$ to overcome the non-compactness of $\ell^2$; Vitali convergence to prove continuity of $\Phi$ on bounded sets; and Arzelà-Ascoli on finite-dimensional truncations to prove tightness of the solution-segment laws. The large-damping inequalities (2.20) and (6.1) are what make dissipation dominate the delayed, distribution-dependent, and noise terms in every estimate.

What would settle it

Set $g=\kappa=\chi=0$ and take $f_i(t,u,v,\mu)=a v_i$ with constant $a>\lambda$, choosing the constants so that (2.20) fails while (H1)-(H3) still hold. The deterministic delay equation $\dot u=-\lambda u+a u(t-r)$ has characteristic equation $z+\lambda-a e^{-zr}=0$; since this function is negative at $z=0$ and tends to $+\infty$, there is a root with positive real part, so $\mathbb{E}\|u(t)\|^2$ grows exponentially. That growth directly contradicts the $D$-pullback absorbing estimate of Lemma 4.1 and shows the claimed conclusion depends on the explicit large-damping threshold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the solution-segment laws of the non-autonomous McKean-Vlasov stochastic delay lattice system (2.16), regarded as a non-autonomous dynamical system $\Phi$ on $\mathcal{P}_4(C_r)$ with $C_r=C([-r,0],\ell^2)$, admit a unique $\mathcal{D}$-pullback measure attractor $\mathcal{A}=\{\mathcal{A}(\tau)\}$ under hypotheses (H1)-(H3), the large-damping condition (2.20), and the integrability conditions (2.22)-(2.23). This means there is a compact invariant family of probability measures on delay segments that attracts all bounded initial-law families in $\mathcal{D}$. Under the additional condition (6.1), the attractor is a singleton $\{\mu(\tau)\}$; in the autonomous case this yields a unique invariant measure $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_4(C_r)$ satisfying $W_2(P^*_{0,t}\upsilon,\mu)\le \tilde{c}_3^{1/2}e^{-\frac12\varepsilon(t-r)}W_2(\upsilon,\mu)$ for all $t\ge r$. Finally, Theorem 7.1 establishes upper semi-continuity: as the distribution-dependent coefficients approach distribution-independent ones, the corresponding attractors $\mathcal{A}_\varepsilon(\tau)$ converge to $\mathcal{A}(\tau)$ in Hausdorff semi-distance.

Load-bearing premise

The argument collapses if the damping coefficient $\lambda$ is not large enough to dominate the delay feedback, the noise coefficients, and the distribution coupling through the explicit inequalities (2.20) and (6.1), because all absorbing and contraction estimates rely on those inequalities.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any initial-law family in $\mathcal{D}$, the segment laws $\mathcal{L}u_\tau(\cdot,\tau-t,\mu_{\tau-t})$ converge to $\mathcal{A}(\tau)$ as $t\to\infty$, giving the system a well-defined statistical steady state despite the absence of a Markov semigroup.
With condition (6.1), distinct initial distributions are pulled together exponentially: the Wasserstein-2 distance between two solution-segment laws decays like $e^{-\frac12\varepsilon(t-r)}$, so the attractor consists of one point.
In the autonomous case this yields a unique invariant measure $\mu\in\mathcal{P}_4(C_r)$, and the exponential contraction implies exponential mixing in $W_2$ for every initial law with finite second moment.
Under the $\varepsilon$-scaling (7.1)-(7.2), the attractors of the distribution-dependent system upper-semicontinuously approach the attractor of the distribution-independent system; in the autonomous singleton case, the invariant measures themselves converge as $\varepsilon\to0^+$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The explicit threshold in (2.20) depends on the BDG constant $c_1$, so the numerical meaning of 'large damping' is not canonical: any improvement in the BDG constant changes the quantitative condition without changing the qualitative result.
The upper semicontinuity proof gives no rate, but combining the exponential contraction of Lemma 6.1 with the $O(\varepsilon)$ solution convergence of Lemma 7.1 should yield an explicit Wasserstein rate of convergence of the coupled invariant measures to the uncoupled one.
The tail-end and tightness strategy is modular enough that the same pullback measure attractor theory should extend to weighted $\ell^2$ spaces or to stronger nonlinear drifts, provided the corresponding weighted energy estimates are available.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper is a straightforward extension of [49] to McKean-Vlasov stochastic delay lattice systems. What's genuinely new: pullback measure attractors for non-autonomous distribution-dependent delay lattice systems on ℓ2, plus singleton attractor, exponential mixing, and upper semicontinuity. The proof machinery follows the standard template: well-posedness via Picard iteration, L2/L4 uniform estimates, absorbing sets, then contraction. The estimates are detailed and mostly credible; the authors clearly know the literature and the delay terms add real technical work. If the main theorem held, this would be a useful contribution.

The problem is the tightness argument in Lemma 5.3. The authors define Zδ as the set of Cr functions with norm ≤ R and support in |i|≤2m, and claim it is compact by Arzelà-Ascoli. That is false. The set is bounded and finite-support, but it is not equicontinuous uniformly over the family. The sequence w_n(t)=sin(nt)e_0 (padded with zeros) lies in Zδ for any m≥1 but has no uniformly convergent subsequence. The Arzelà-Ascoli argument in the proof only shows each individual function is uniformly continuous; it does not provide a modulus of continuity valid for the whole set. This is not a minor slip, because the compactness of Zδ is what carries the tightness of {Luτ(·,τ−t_n,v_n)}. Without it, the covering argument in (5.18)-(5.20) collapses.

Could it be repaired? Probably, but with additional work. One would need a uniform-in-time regularity estimate for the solution segments, e.g., a Kolmogorov-type bound on E||u(t+h)−u(t)||^2 decaying in h, or some compact embedding. No such estimate appears in the paper. The tail-bound index slip the reader noticed (using (5.16) with θ_{m0} while the bound starts at 2m0) is real but secondary; the compactness failure is the load-bearing issue.

The rest of the paper is in decent shape. The large-damping condition (2.20) is explicit and used consistently; the mixing and semicontinuity sections are conditional on the attractor existence. Some typos and small notational glitches, but nothing else that looks fatal.

Who is this for? Specialists in stochastic lattice dynamics or McKean-Vlasov equations. They would get a clear template for this class of systems, but they should not take Theorem 5.1 at face value yet. I'd send it to a referee, because the core idea is sound and the gap is identifiable and possibly fixable. But the authors need to address the compactness issue before it is citable.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the non-autonomous McKean-Vlasov stochastic delay lattice system (1.1) on Z. It proves well-posedness of strong and weak solutions, defines the non-autonomous dynamical system on probability measures induced by solution segments, and claims existence and uniqueness of a D-pullback measure attractor under a large-damping condition (2.20). It then derives singleton attractors and exponential mixing under an additional condition (6.1), and upper semicontinuity of attractors as the distribution dependence vanishes. The proofs rely on uniform tail estimates, fourth-moment estimates, and an Arzelà-Ascoli/tightness argument in C([-r,0],ℓ2).

Significance. If the main existence theorem is established, the paper would provide a useful framework for McKean-Vlasov stochastic delay lattice systems, with explicit checkable assumptions and an explicit exponential mixing rate. The strengths include the detailed well-posedness argument, the explicit large-damping conditions (2.20) and (6.1), the absence of fitted parameters, and the clear statement of upper semicontinuity under the convergence hypotheses (7.1)-(7.2). However, the central tightness proof in Lemma 5.3 contains a false compactness assertion, so Theorem 5.1 and the subsequent results are not established as written.

major comments (3)

[Lemma 5.3] The set Zδ = {w ∈ Cr : ||w||_Cr ≤ R(δ,τ), w_i(t)=0 for |i|>2m} is claimed to be compact in Cr, but this is false. Arzelà-Ascoli requires equicontinuity uniform over the whole family; a uniform sup-norm bound and finite support do not imply it. The sequence w_n(t)=sin(nt)e_0 (with m fixed large enough) lies in Zδ and has no convergent subsequence in C([-r,0],ℓ2), since the family is not equicontinuous. Pointwise uniform continuity of each w is not enough. Consequently the covering argument (5.18)-(5.20) does not establish tightness of {Lu_τ(·,τ-t_n,v_n)}, and D-pullback asymptotic compactness (Definition 2.3), hence Theorem 5.1, is not proved. A uniform-in-n modulus-of-continuity estimate for the solution segments would be needed to repair this gap.
[Eqs. (5.16)-(5.17)] The tail estimate (5.16) controls sum_{|i|≥2m0} |u_i|^2, whereas (5.17) bounds ||θ_{m0}u_τ||^2. The cutoff θ_{m0} also charges the annulus m0 ≤ |i| < 2m0, so (5.17) does not follow from (5.16) as written. One should apply Lemma 4.3 at a level that controls the m0-tail, or replace θ_{m0} by θ_{2m0} and adjust the finite-support set accordingly. This is a local slip, but it occurs inside the same lemma that contains the compactness gap.
[Lemma 4.4, Eq. (4.30)] In deriving the fourth-moment estimate, the term 12∫ e^{2εs}||κ(s)||^2 E||u(s)||^2 ds is absorbed into a multiple of ∫ e^{2εs} E||u(s)||^4 ds without justification. The displayed inequality does not follow from (2.15) as printed; a Hölder/Young estimate controlling ∫ e^{2εs} E||u||^2 over [τ-t,τ] is needed. Since (4.26) is the fourth-moment estimate behind Lemma 5.2 and Theorem 5.1, this also requires correction.

minor comments (5)

[Lemma 5.3 (end)] The conclusion 'υ ∈ P4(H)' should read 'υ ∈ P4(Cr)'.
[Lemma 4.3 (proof)] The phrase 'Following (2.20) and Lemma 4.3' should refer to Lemma 4.2, since the preceding estimate uses the uniform L2 bound from Lemma 4.2.
[Corollary 5.1] The notation Φ(τ,t) in the final sentence should be Φ(t,τ), and equation (5.8) should be P*_{τ,τ+t}, not P*_{τ,t}, for consistency with the definition (5.1).
[Section 7] In the definition after (7.4), the operator σ~ : R × ℓ2 × ℓ2 → L(ℓ2,ℓ2) is written as σ~ε, which appears to be a typo; the distribution-independent operator should be σ~.
[Lemma 7.1 (proof)] The proof contains a term (g_ϵ(t)-g(t))dt even though the system has a common forcing g; this term is zero and should be removed for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all main theorems are derived from explicit assumptions and proved estimates.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against its stated assumptions. The pullback measure attractor in Theorem 5.1 is obtained by verifying the standard criterion (Proposition 2.1, cited from [53]) through three independently proved lemmas: Lemma 5.1 (Wasserstein continuity), Lemma 5.2 (closed D-pullback absorbing set from the L4 estimate of Lemma 4.4), and Lemma 5.3 (D-pullback asymptotic compactness from tail estimates of Lemma 4.3). None of these lemmas assumes the existence of the attractor; the absorbing ball K(τ) is defined by an explicit moment bound M4(τ) that comes from the Itô-formula estimates, not from the target object. The mixing statement (Theorem 6.1) follows from the contraction estimate Lemma 6.1, whose proof uses only assumptions (H1)-(H3), (2.20), (2.22)-(2.23), and the additional explicit condition (6.1); the exponential rate and constant are computed, not fitted. The upper-semicontinuity result (Theorem 7.1) is derived from the convergence estimate Lemma 7.1 under the explicit approximation hypotheses (7.1)-(7.2), not by assuming the conclusion. The only self-citation is [49] in the introduction, which is motivational context and is not invoked in any proof. The skeptical concern about Lemma 5.3 is a correctness question about whether Zδ is compact via Arzelà-Ascoli, not a circular-reasoning question: even if that compactness claim were false, it would be a gap in the proof, not a reduction of the theorem to its own assumptions. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the same authors is used to force the choice of attractor.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data; all constants are either universal, structural norms of coefficients, or auxiliary bounds M_i whose exact values do not affect the statements. lambda is a coefficient of the equation, not a fitted parameter. The stated inequalities are explicit scope conditions of the theorems.

assumptions (8)

domain assumption Global Lipschitz and dissipativity conditions (H1) on f_i, with p >= 2 and eta in Linf(R,l2) intersect L1_loc(R,l1)
Imposed on the drift to control Itô estimates; not derived.
domain assumption Lipschitz and linear growth conditions (H2) on sigma_i, with chi and kappa in Linf(R,l2)
Controls stochastic integral terms and second moment estimates.
domain assumption External forcing condition (H3), g in L2_loc(R,l2)
Needed for well-posedness and absorbing estimates.
domain assumption Large damping condition (2.20) and small epsilon choice in (2.21)
Ensures dissipation dominates memory and noise terms; used in Lemmas 4.1-4.4 and 6.1.
domain assumption Weighted integrability conditions (2.22)-(2.23) on g and eta
Guarantees finite absorbing radii and the exponential decay needed for the D class.
domain assumption Stronger damping condition (6.1) for singleton attractor and exponential mixing
Adds contraction in Wasserstein distance; needed only for Theorem 6.1.
domain assumption Uniform convergence conditions (7.1)-(7.2) for the epsilon-family
Used to prove upper semicontinuity in Section 7.
standard math Standard stochastic calculus background: Itô formula, BDG inequality, Yamada-Watanabe, Skorokhod representation, Vitali and Arzela-Ascoli theorems
Invoked throughout as unproved tools.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pullback measure attractors and limiting behaviors of McKean-Vlasov stochastic delay lattice systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SIROTQOU

@misc{pith2026241215528,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pullback measure attractors and limiting behaviors of McKean-Vlasov stochastic delay lattice systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SIROTQOU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15528}
}

abstract

We study the long-term behavior of the distribution of the solution process to the non-autonomous McKean-Vlasov stochastic delay lattice system defined on the integer set $\mathbb{Z}$. Specifically, we first establish the well-posedness of solutions for this non-autonomous, distribution-dependent stochastic delay lattice system. Then, we prove the existence and uniqueness of pullback measure attractors for the non-autonomous dynamical system generated by the solution operators, defined in the space of probability measures. Furthermore, as an application of the pullback measure attractor, we prove the ergodicity and exponentially mixing of invariant measures for the system under appropriate conditions. Finally, we establish the upper semi-continuity of these attractors as the distribution-dependent stochastic delay lattice system converges to a distribution-independent system.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Existence and vanishing noise limit of measure attractors for McKean-Vlasov $p$-Laplacian lattice systems with delay driven by L\'evy noise
math.PR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

Pullback measure attractors exist and are unique for McKean-Vlasov p-Laplace delay lattice systems driven by superlinear Lévy noise; singleton attractors converge at the optimal Wasserstein rate ½ as noise intensity t...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[49]

L. Shi, J. Shen, K. Lu and B. Wang, Invariant measures, pe riodic measures and pullback measure attractors of McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations on unbounded domains, arXiv:2409.17548, 2024

arXiv 2024
[1]

Ahmed and X

N.U. Ahmed and X. Ding, A semilinear Mckean-Vlasov stoch astic in Hilbert space, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 60 (1995), 65–85

work page 1995
[2]

Ba˜ nos, The Bismut-Elworthy-Li formula for mean-ﬁel d stochastic diﬀerential equations, Ann

D. Ba˜ nos, The Bismut-Elworthy-Li formula for mean-ﬁel d stochastic diﬀerential equations, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat.54 (2018), 220–233

work page 2018
[3]

Bao and X

J. Bao and X. Huang X, (2022). Approximations of McKean-V lasov stochastic diﬀerential equations with irregular coeﬃcients, J. Theoret. Probab. 35 (2022), 1187–1215

work page 2022
[4]

J. Bao, M. Scheutzow and C. Yuan, Existence of invariant p robability measures for functional McKean-Vlasov SDEs, Electron. J. Probab. 27 (2022), 1-14

work page 2022
[5]

P. W. Bates and A. Chmaj, A discrete convolution model for phase transitions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 150 (1999), 281–305

work page 1999
[6]

P. W. Bates, X. Chen and A. Chmaj, Traveling waves of bista ble dynamics on a lattice SIAM J. Math. Anal. 35 (2003), 520–546

work page 2003
[7]

P. W. Bates, H. Lisei and K. Lu, Attractors for stochastic lattice dynamical systems, Stoch. Dyn. 6 (2006), 1–21

work page 2006

Show all 71 references

[8]

P. W. Bates, K. Lu and B. Wang, Attractors for lattice dyna mical systems, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 11 (2001), 143–153. 42 LIN SHI, JUN SHEN, AND KENING LU

2001
[9]

P. W. Bates, K. Lu and B. Wang, Attractors of non-autonomo us stochastic lattice systems in weighted spaces, Phys. D 289 (2014), 32–50

2014
[10]

Beyn and S

W.-J. Beyn and S. Y. Pilyugin, Attractors of reaction di ﬀusion systems on inﬁnite lattices, J. Dyn. Diﬀer. Equ. , 15 (2003), 485–515

2003
[11]

Caraballo, F

T. Caraballo, F. Morillas and J. Valero, Attractors of s tochastic lattice dynamical systems with a multiplicative noise and non-Lipschitz nonlinearities, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 253 (2012), 667–693

2012
[12]

Caraballo, F

T. Caraballo, F. Morillas and J. Valero, On diﬀerential equations with delay in Banach spaces and attractors for retarded lattice dynamical systems, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 34 (2014), 51–77

2014
[13]

Chen and B

Z. Chen and B. Wang, Weak mean attractors and invariant m easures for stochastic Schr¨ odinger delay lattice systems, J. Dyn. Diﬀer. Equ. 35 (2023), 3201–3240

2023
[14]

Chen and B

Z. Chen and B. Wang, Well-posedness and large deviation s of fractional McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction- diﬀusion equations on unbounded domains, arXiv:2406.1069 4, 2024

2024
[15]

Z. Chen, D. Yang and S. Zhong, Large deviation principle for stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo lattice systems, Com- mun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 136 (2024), Paper No. 108070, 22 pp

2024
[16]

Z. Chen, D. Yang and S. Zhong, Limiting dynamics for stoc hastic FitzHugh-Nagumo lattice systems in weighted spaces, J. Dyn. Diﬀer. Equ. 36 (2024), 321–352

2024
[17]

Z. Chen, D. Yang and S. Zhong, Wasserstein convergence r ate of invariant measures for stochastic Schr¨ odinger delay lattice systems, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 415 (2025), 52–90

2025
[18]

T. Chen, S. Zhou and C. Zhao, Attractors for discrete non linear Schr¨ odinger equation with delay, Acta Math. Appl. Sin. Engl. Ser. 26 (2010), 633–642

2010
[19]

S.-N. Chow, J. Mallet-Paret and W. Shen, Traveling wave s in lattice dynamical systems, J. Diﬀer. Equ. , 149 (1998), 248–291

1998
[20]

Dawson and J

D. Dawson and J. Vaillancourt, Stochastic Mckean-Vlas ov equations, Nonlinear Diﬀer. Equat. Appl. 2 (1995), 199–229

1995
[21]

X. Fan, X. Huang, Y. Suo and C. Yuan, Distribution depend ent SDEs driven by fractional Brownian motions, Stoch. Process. Appl. 151 (2022), 23–67

2022
[22]

Fournier and A

N. Fournier and A. Guillin, On the rate of convergence in Wasserstein distance of the empirical measure, Probab. Theory Related Fields 162 (2015), 707–738

2015
[23]

J. Gao, W. Hong and W. Liu, Distribution-dependent stoc hastic porous media equations, Stoch. Dyn. 22 (2022), 2240026

2022
[24]

Gu and P

A. Gu and P. E. Kloeden, Asymptotic behavior of a nonauto nomous p-Laplacian lattice system, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg. 26 (2016), 1650174, 9 pp

2016
[25]

Hammersley, S

W. Hammersley, S. David and L. Szpruch, Weak existence a nd uniqueness for McKean-Vlasov SDEs with common noise, Ann. Probab. 49 (2021), 527–555

2021
[26]

Han and P

X. Han and P. E. Kloeden, Non-autonomous lattice system s with switching eﬀects and delayed recovery, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 261 (2016), 2986–3009

2016
[27]

X. Han, W. Shen and S. Zhou, Random attractors for stocha stic lattice dynamical systems in weighted spaces, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 250 (2011), 1235–1266

2011
[28]

Heinemann, Distribution-dependent stochastic diﬀ erential delay equations in ﬁnite and inﬁnite dimensions, Inﬁn

R. Heinemann, Distribution-dependent stochastic diﬀ erential delay equations in ﬁnite and inﬁnite dimensions, Inﬁn. Dimens. Anal. Quantum Probab. Relat. Top. 24 (2021), Paper No. 2050024, 32 pp

2021
[29]

W. Hong, S. Li, W. Liu, Large deviation principle for McK ean-Vlasov quasilinear stochastic evolution equations, Appl. Math. Optim. 84 (2021), 1119–1147

2021
[30]

Huang, M

X. Huang, M. R¨ ockner and F. Wang, Nonlinear Fokker-Pla nck equations for probability measures on path space and path-distribution dependent SDEs, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 39 (2019), 3017–3035

2019
[31]

Huang and F

X. Huang and F. Wang, Regularities and exponential ergo dicity in entropy for SDEs driven by distribution dependent noise, Bernoulli 30 (2024), 3303-3323

2024
[32]

Huang, S

X. Huang, S. Wang and F. Wang, Weak solution and invarian t probability measure for McKean-Vlasov SDEs with integrable drifts, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 537 (2024), 128318

2024
[33]

C. Li, C. Hsu, J. Lin and C. Zhao, Global attractors for th e discrete Klein-Gordon-Schr¨ odinger type equations,J. Diﬀerence Equ. Appl. 20 (2014), 1404–1426

2014
[34]

Li and B

D. Li and B. Wang, Pullback measure attractors for non-a utonomous stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations on thin domains, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 397 (2024), 232–261

2024
[35]

D. Li, B. Wang and X. Wang Periodic measures of stochasti c delay lattice systems, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 272 (2021), 74–104

2021
[36]

D. Li, B. Wang and X. Wang, Limiting behavior of invarian t measures of stochastic delay lattice systems, J. Dyn. Diﬀer. Equ. 34 (2022), 1453–1487

2022
[37]

Y. Li, F. Wu and L. Xie, Poisson equation on Wasserstein s pace and diﬀusion approximations for McKean-Vlasov equation, arXiv:2203.12796, 2022. PULLBACK MEASURE ATTRACTORS OF MCKEAN-VLASOV STOCHASTIC D ELAY LATTICE SYSTEMS 43

2022 arXiv
[38]

Liang, M.B

M. Liang, M.B. Majka and J. Wang, Exponential ergodicit y for SDEs and McKean-Vlasov processes with L´ evy noise, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist. 57 (2021), 1665–1701

2021
[39]

W. Liu, Y. Song, J. Zhai and T. Zhang, Large and moderate d eviation principles for McKean-Vlasov SDEs with jumps, Potential Analysis 59 (2023), 1141–1190

2023
[40]

Marek and N

C. Marek and N. J. Cutland, Measure attractors for stoch astic Navier-Stokes equations, Electron. J. Probab. 8 (1998), 1–15

1998
[41]

H. P. McKean, A class of Markov processes associated wit h nonlinear parabolic equations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 56 (1996), 1907–1911

1996
[42]

Morimoto, Attractors of probability measures for se milinear stochastic evolution equations, Stochastic Anal

H. Morimoto, Attractors of probability measures for se milinear stochastic evolution equations, Stochastic Anal. Appl. 10 (1992), 205–212

1992
[43]

P. Ren, K. T. Sturm and F. Wang, Exponential ergodicity f or time-periodic McKean-Vlasov SDEs, arXiv:2110.06473v1, 2023

2023 arXiv
[44]

Ren and F

P. Ren and F. Wang, Bismut formula for Lions derivative o f distribution dependent SDEs and applications, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 267 (2019), 4745–4777

2019
[45]

R¨ ockner, X

M. R¨ ockner, X. Sun and Y. Xie, Strong convergence order for slow-fast McKean-Vlasov stochastic diﬀerential equations, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist. 57 (2021), 547–576

2021
[46]

R¨ ockner and X

M. R¨ ockner and X. Zhang, Well-posedness of distributi on dependent SDEs with singular drifts, Bernoulli 27 (2021), 1131–1158

2021
[47]

Schmalfuss, Long-time behaviour of the stochastic N avier-Stokes equation, Math

B. Schmalfuss, Long-time behaviour of the stochastic N avier-Stokes equation, Math. Nachr. 152 (1991), 7–20

1991
[48]

Schmalfuss, Qualitative properties for the stochas tic Navier-Stokes equation, Nonlinear Anal

B. Schmalfuss, Qualitative properties for the stochas tic Navier-Stokes equation, Nonlinear Anal. 28 (1997), 1545– 1563

1997
[50]

A. S. Sznitman, Topics in propagation of chaos, In ´Ecole D’Et´ e de Probabilit´ es de Saint-Flour XIX-1989, Lecture Notes in Math. Vol. 1464, pp. 165–251, Springer, Berlin, 1991

1989
[51]

A. A. Vlasov, The vibrational properties of an electron gas, Sov. Phys. 10 (1968), 721–733

1968
[52]

Wang, Dynamics of systems on inﬁnite lattices, J

B. Wang, Dynamics of systems on inﬁnite lattices, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 221 (2006), 224–245

2006
[53]

Wang, Suﬃcient and necessary criteria for existence of pullback attractors for non-compact random dynamical systems, J

B. Wang, Suﬃcient and necessary criteria for existence of pullback attractors for non-compact random dynamical systems, J. Diﬀer. Equ. 253 (2012), 1544–1583

2012
[54]

Wang, Dynamics of stochastic reaction-diﬀusion lat tice systems driven by nonlinear noise, J

B. Wang, Dynamics of stochastic reaction-diﬀusion lat tice systems driven by nonlinear noise, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 477 (2019), 104–132

2019
[55]

Wang, Large deviation principles of stochastic reac tion-diﬀusion lattice systems, Discrete Contin

B. Wang, Large deviation principles of stochastic reac tion-diﬀusion lattice systems, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 29 (2024), 1319–1343

2024
[56]

Wang, Distribution dependent SDEs for Landau type eq uations, Stoch

F. Wang, Distribution dependent SDEs for Landau type eq uations, Stoch. Process. Appl. 128 (2018), 595–621

2018
[57]

Wang, Exponential ergodicity for non-dissipative M cKean-Vlasov SDEs, Bernoulli 29 (2023), 1035–1062

F. Wang, Exponential ergodicity for non-dissipative M cKean-Vlasov SDEs, Bernoulli 29 (2023), 1035–1062

2023
[58]

Wang, Exponential ergodicity for singular reﬂectin g McKean-Vlasov SDEs, Stoc

F. Wang, Exponential ergodicity for singular reﬂectin g McKean-Vlasov SDEs, Stoc. Proc. Appl. 160 (2023), 265–293

2023
[59]

Wang and K

Y. Wang and K. Bai, Pullback attractors for a class of non linear lattices with delays, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 20 (2015), 1213–1230

2015
[60]

X. Wang, S. Li and D. Xu, Random attractors for second-or der stochastic lattice dynamical systems, Nonlinear Anal. 72 (2010), 483–494

2010
[61]

X. Wang, K. Lu and B. Wang, Exponential stability of non- autonomous stochastic delay lattice systems with multiplicative noise, J. Dyn. Diﬀer. Equ. 28 (2016), 1309–1335

2016
[62]

Y. Wang, C. Yang and R. Wang, Invariant measures of stoch astic lattice plate equations: stability, ergodicity and mixing, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 47 (2024), Paper No. 87, 21 pp

2024
[63]

Wang and S

Z. Wang and S. Zhou, Existence and upper semicontinuity of attractors for non-autonomous stochastic lattice systems with random coupled coeﬃcients, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 15 (2016), 2221–2245

2016
[64]

S. Weng, S. Mi and D. Li, Measure attractors of stochasti c fractional lattice systems, Fractal Fract. 8 (2024), article no. 448, 1–16

2024
[65]

Xiang and S

X. Xiang and S. Zhou, Attractors for second order nonaut onomous lattice system with dispersive term, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 46 (2015), 893–914

2015
[66]

W. Yan, Y. Li and S. Ji, Random attractors for ﬁrst order s tochastic retarded lattice dynamical systems, J. Math. Phys. 51 (2010), 032702, 17 pp

2010
[67]

Zhao and S

C. Zhao and S. Zhou, Attractors of retarded ﬁrst order la ttice systems, Nonlinearity 20 (2007), 1987–2006

2007
[68]

Zhang, Existence and non-uniqueness of stationary d istributions for distribution dependent SDEs, Electron

S. Zhang, Existence and non-uniqueness of stationary d istributions for distribution dependent SDEs, Electron. J. Probab. 28 (2023), 1–34

2023
[69]

Zhang and L

C. Zhang and L. Zhao, The attractors for 2nd-order stoch astic delay lattice systems, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 37 (2017), 575–590. 44 LIN SHI, JUN SHEN, AND KENING LU

2017
[70]

Zhou and M

S. Zhou and M. Hua, Random attractor and exponentially s tability for the second order nonautonomous retarded lattice systems with multiplicative white noise, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 507 (2022), Paper No. 125842, 26 pp

2022
[71]

Zhou and Z

S. Zhou and Z. Wang, Random attractors for stochastic re tarded lattice systems, J. Diﬀerence Equ. Appl. 19 (2013), 1523–1543. (Lin Shi) School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan 611731, P. R. China Email addres...

2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [49]

L. Shi, J. Shen, K. Lu and B. Wang, Invariant measures, pe riodic measures and pullback measure attractors of McKean-Vlasov stochastic reaction-diﬀusion equations on unbounded domains, arXiv:2409.17548, 2024

arXiv 2024

[2] [1]

Ahmed and X

N.U. Ahmed and X. Ding, A semilinear Mckean-Vlasov stoch astic in Hilbert space, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 60 (1995), 65–85

work page 1995

[3] [2]

Ba˜ nos, The Bismut-Elworthy-Li formula for mean-ﬁel d stochastic diﬀerential equations, Ann

D. Ba˜ nos, The Bismut-Elworthy-Li formula for mean-ﬁel d stochastic diﬀerential equations, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat.54 (2018), 220–233

work page 2018

[4] [3]

Bao and X

J. Bao and X. Huang X, (2022). Approximations of McKean-V lasov stochastic diﬀerential equations with irregular coeﬃcients, J. Theoret. Probab. 35 (2022), 1187–1215

work page 2022

[5] [4]

J. Bao, M. Scheutzow and C. Yuan, Existence of invariant p robability measures for functional McKean-Vlasov SDEs, Electron. J. Probab. 27 (2022), 1-14

work page 2022

[6] [5]

P. W. Bates and A. Chmaj, A discrete convolution model for phase transitions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 150 (1999), 281–305

work page 1999

[7] [6]

P. W. Bates, X. Chen and A. Chmaj, Traveling waves of bista ble dynamics on a lattice SIAM J. Math. Anal. 35 (2003), 520–546

work page 2003

[8] [7]

P. W. Bates, H. Lisei and K. Lu, Attractors for stochastic lattice dynamical systems, Stoch. Dyn. 6 (2006), 1–21

work page 2006