Radio filaments as Z-pinched Galactic center wind

Fan Zhang

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 73 references

Radio filaments as Z-pinched Galactic center wind

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes that the nonthermal radio filaments at the Galactic center are produced when the Galactic center wind blows across magnetic structures, creating a current that Z-pinches into filaments and accelerates electrons to…

desk verdict A well-framed, honestly tentative proposal for Galactic center radio filaments; the uncalculated current-generation step is the main soft spot, but the idea is novel and deserves refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15575 v1 pith:M3QXQKVN submitted 2024-12-20 astro-ph.GA

Fan Zhang This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.GA

keywords GalacticcenterradiofilamentsZ-pinchplasmaastrophysicssynchrotronradiationdiocotroninstabilitywindmagneticfieldsnonthermalemission

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes an explanation for the mysterious nonthermal radio filaments at the Galactic center: they are Z-pinched threads of the Galactic center wind. When the wind washes over local magnetic structures, electrons and ions are deflected differently, producing an electric current; the current's own magnetic field contracts it into filaments, and the dynamic contraction creates an axial electric field that accelerates electrons to relativistic energies, which then radiate the observed synchrotron emission. An axial magnetic field, possibly generated through the diocotron instability, stabilizes the filaments and matches the measured field strengths and braided substructure. If correct, the model would explain the filaments' orientation, morphology, magnetic fields, and spectral behavior without invoking a global 'backbone' poloidal field. The paper supports the idea with order-of-magnitude estimates showing the required currents, voltages, and energy budgets are plausible.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the Z-pinch: a current-carrying plasma column in which the self-generated azimuthal magnetic field exerts a compressive (pinching) force, described quantitatively by the generalized Bennett relation. The paper applies this relation to a current of ~$10^{15}$–$10^{16}$ A set up by the wind's differential deflection of electrons and ions, deriving from it the pinching pressure, a pinching timescale of ~$10^{2}$–$10^{3}$ yr, and the axial electric field needed to accelerate electrons; it then invokes the diocotron instability — a plasma instability in which shear in the electron flow converts radial charge separation into azimuthal vortical motion — as the channel by which an axial magnetic field is generated to stabilize the column. The central identity is Eq. (2), I[A] ≈ (3 × $10^{12}$) × 2πa[pc] Bf_z[G]/µ0, which ties the observed filament width and axial field to the current that drives the whole process.

What would settle it

A particle-in-cell or magnetohydrodynamic simulation of a Galactic center-like wind (density $10^{-2}$–$10^{-1}$ $cm^{-3}$, speed $10^{5}$–$10^{6}$ m/s) flowing past a magnetic structure of 10 µG–100 mG would settle whether the claimed net axial current of $10^{15}$–$10^{16}$ A is actually established before return currents and field-line closure cancel it. Observationally, the model's low-Lorentz-factor variant predicts that some high-latitude filaments should be brighter at ultra-long radio wavelengths than standard higher-gamma models suggest; a sensitive low-frequency survey of the Galactic center could test this.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the Galactic center's nonthermal radio filaments are the product of a Z-pinch operating on the Galactic center wind. The wind carries a partially ionized plasma outward from the plane; when it encounters local magnetic structures (molecular clouds, HII regions, or field inhomogeneities), the electrons and ions, having opposite charges and very different masses, are deflected unequally and a net axial current is set up. That current, of order $10^{15}$–$10^{16}$ A, creates an azimuthal magnetic field that pinches the plasma into long filaments. Because the magnetic field must rearrange during the constriction, a toroidal displacement current appears, which by Maxwell's equations requires a poloidal electric field along the filament; this field accelerates runaway electrons to Lorentz factors of order 100 or more, and the ensuing synchrotron radiation is the observed nonthermal radio emission. The same process generates an axial magnetic field — most plausibly via the diocotron instability — that halts the pinch and stabilizes the filament against kink and sausage modes, accounting for the predominantly axial field orientation and the observed braided fine structure.

Load-bearing premise

The entire chain depends on the premise that the wind's passage over local magnetic structures actually produces a net axial current of order $10^{15}$–$10^{16}$ A that is not canceled by return currents; the paper itself concedes that 'cancellations are likely as the field needs to close up into loops' and states it cannot give a detailed quantitative analysis of the deflection process.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The filaments' orientation perpendicular to the plane is set by the wind direction, not by a global poloidal magnetic field, removing the need for a highly ordered 'backbone' field at the Galactic center.
The observed predominantly axial magnetic field in filaments is a natural steady-state outcome: the axial field grows until it balances the pinching pressure, and must exceed the azimuthal component by roughly an order of magnitude to suppress kink and sausage instabilities.
The model accounts for the observed spread and sign changes in filament spectral indices: where the synchrotron peak sits relative to the observing band varies naturally, and because electrons are accelerated progressively along the filament, spectral index should trend monotonically with Galactic latitude.
The required electron Lorentz factors can be as low as ~100, so some filaments may peak at frequencies below the usual GHz windows; future ultra-long-wavelength observations could catch this.
Young, dimmer filaments in their formative stage should be detectable by upcoming more sensitive instruments, offering a direct way to watch the pinch develop.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the Z-pinch mechanism is generic, similar wind-driven radio filaments should appear in other galactic nuclei with strong outflows and dense magnetic structures; targeted searches in nearby starburst or Seyfert galaxies could test this prediction.
The paper's assumption that the net current survives return-current cancellation is the crux; a more rigorous treatment of field-line closure and the Hall effect in the wind–structure interaction would either confirm or kill the model, and could be done with existing plasma simulation codes.
The model effectively turns radio filaments into probes of the Galactic center wind: measuring the variation of spectral index along a filament could map the wind speed and local magnetic structure, an observational program not discussed explicitly in the paper.
Because the paper works in SI units and order-of-magnitude estimates, the same set of relations could be cross-checked against laboratory Z-pinch experiments scaled to astrophysical parameters, providing an empirical anchor for the claimed stabilizing role of the axial field.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this paper is a well-framed speculation, not a demonstrated solution. It proposes that the Galactic center wind, blowing over magnetic structures, separates charges by mass-to-charge ratio, creating a current that z-pinches; the pinch accelerates electrons and a diocotron-generated axial field stabilizes the filaments. That combination is new—earlier pinch models needed a pre-existing poloidal field, and earlier wind models didn't invoke pinching. The paper engages seriously with recent observations, including the latitude-dependent spectral index trend and the braided substructure seen by Pare et al. It is also uncommonly honest: it explicitly says cancellations are likely, that it cannot do a detailed quantitative analysis, and labels its own numbers as numerology.

The soft spots are load-bearing, not cosmetic. The current is inferred from the observed axial field via the Bennett relation, then used in every subsequent estimate, so the checks are partly circular. The physical step that should produce the current is not calculated; in a collisionless magnetized plasma the E×B drift is species-independent, and the polarization drift that does separate charges is transient and tends to cancel. The paper's own concession that 'cancellations are likely' is exactly the weak point. There is also an internal inconsistency: Eq. (3) quotes a velocity difference of 1e-4–1e-2 m/s, but direct substitution of the stated current and density gives a much larger (or at least different) value. That kind of loose numerology matters when the whole case is order-of-magnitude.

For specialists, the paper is a useful, testable hypothesis and it connects to laboratory pinch experiments. I would not cite it as established, but I would send it to a referee rather than desk reject. The referee should ask for a quantitative model of the current-generation step, or a clear statement that the paper is a conjecture needing simulation. If the journal's bar is 'demonstrated explanation,' it fails; if it accepts clearly labeled speculative ideas, it deserves consideration.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the nonthermal radio filaments in the Galactic center are formed when the Galactic center wind washes over magnetic field structures: the disparate charge-to-mass ratios of electrons and ions lead to a current, which is Z-pinched into filaments; the time-varying azimuthal magnetic field induces an axial electric field that accelerates electrons to relativistic energies, producing synchrotron emission; a self-generated axial magnetic field, possibly via the diocotron instability, stabilizes the filaments. The paper presents order-of-magnitude estimates for the pinch current, the required accelerating field, and the stabilizing field, comparing them to observed filament properties.

Significance. If the mechanism were correct, it would offer a self-consistent scenario in which the axial magnetic field of the filaments is generated locally rather than inherited from an ordered background poloidal field, which is attractive given observations that do not show a dominant poloidal field outside the filaments. The paper gives a clear chain of plasma-physics estimates and makes falsifiable predictions, such as spectral-index trends with Galactic latitude and possible ultra-long-wavelength emission. However, the central premise—that the wind can sustain a net axial current of ~1e15–1e16 A—is not derived; the paper explicitly concedes that cancellations are likely and that no detailed quantitative analysis is attempted. Moreover, the basic charge-separation picture is inconsistent with the expected dynamics of a collisionless magnetized plasma, and the quantitative links are largely circular. The manuscript is an honest speculation, but the load-bearing first step remains unsupported.

major comments (3)

[II A] The pinch current I is not derived from the wind–magnetic-field interaction; it is inferred from the observed axial field Bf_z via the Bennett relation (Eq. 2). All subsequent quantities—Bφ in Eq. (17), E in Eq. (14), and Bz in Eq. (22)—scale with I, so the entire mechanism rests on this inferred value. The paper admits 'cancellations are likely as the field needs to close up into loops' and states it is 'unable to attempt a detailed quantitative analysis.' Without a concrete calculation showing that a net axial current of this magnitude is generated and that return currents do not cancel it, the proposed Z-pinch chain does not begin.
[I, item A; II A] The charge-separation mechanism is physically problematic. In a collisionless magnetized plasma, the E×B drift is charge- and mass-independent, so the stated 'bulk velocity differential' cannot be sustained by the Lorentz force alone. The polarization drift does separate charges, but it is transient and is quenched by the induced space-charge electric field. The paper does not explain what maintains a net current along the filament axis, and its claim that 'whatever the magnetic field configuration' electrons are more strongly deflected is not valid in the magnetized, force-free regime the paper itself invokes in Sec. II C.
[II C] The claimed consistency between the terminal axial field from the diocotron estimate (Eq. 22) and the observed Bf_z is a circular test, because the current I in Eq. (22) was set by the same observed Bf_z through Eq. (2). The agreement is therefore a self-consistency check rather than an independent prediction; this should be stated clearly, and the text should avoid presenting it as confirmation.

minor comments (5)

[II A, Eq. (3)] The relation between I and Δv⊥ is not shown. If I = n e Δv⊥ (π a²), the quoted range of 10⁻⁴–10⁻² m/s is plausible for the stated parameters, but the intermediate expression should be given.
[II A, Eq. (2)] The numerical factor '3 × 10¹²' combined with μ0 in the denominator is dimensionally confusing; please specify the unit system or provide the conversion explicitly.
[II B] The symbol E_min is used for both the electric field (Eq. 14) and an energy (Eq. 21); please use different symbols to avoid ambiguity.
[II B] The sentence 'Compare E_min with Eqs. 7 through 10 of [26]' is unclear because the content of those equations is not reproduced; please spell out the comparison.
[II B] The sign convention for the axial electric field and the direction of electron acceleration relative to the Galactic plane should be clarified, as the text says electrons are accelerated toward the plane while the electric field points away from it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the current is inferred from the observed axial field as a consistency check, not predicted from it and then relabeled as an independent forecast.

full rationale

The paper is an explicitly tentative, order-of-magnitude proposal. Its central premise—that the Galactic-center wind creates a net axial current of ~1e15–1e16 A via charge separation—is not derived from first principles; the paper instead infers the current required by the observed axial field through the Bennett relation (Eq. 2), and then tests whether that current is consistent with the other parts of the mechanism (Ampère-law azimuthal field, inductive electric field, runaway threshold, and diocotron threshold). This is a self-consistency check, not a circular derivation: the current is a model parameter set by one observed quantity, and the subsequent equations are independent relations involving that parameter. The later comparison of the diocotron terminal field with the observed Bf_z is partially inherited, because I in Eq. (22) was fixed by Eq. (2) using the same Bf_z; however, the diocotron relation also contains independent inputs (Vmin from the electron-acceleration requirement, L, a), and the resulting coefficient is not identically unity, so the comparison retains some falsifiable content. The paper explicitly concedes the main gap: "cancellations are likely as the field needs to close up into loops" and "we are unable to attempt a detailed quantitative analysis of the deflection process post-haste." That is an unverified assumption, which is a scientific-correctness risk, not a circularity. There are no load-bearing self-citations: the plasma formulae are drawn from external references (Peratt, Bennett, Witalis, etc.), and no unique result is imported from the author's own prior work. I therefore find no step in the derivation that reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The quantitative chain rests on observed or assumed parameters such as density, temperature, field strengths, and sizes, and on plasma textbook relations from Peratt and others. The central current is set by the observed axial field rather than derived from the wind, and the current-generation step is explicitly left unquantified.

free parameters (8)

Bf_z (observed axial field along filaments) = 0.1 to 1 mG
Used in Eq. (2) to set the total current I; an observational input that drives the entire quantitative chain.
n_e = n_i (plasma density) = 0.01 to 0.1 cm^-3
Assumed Galactic center wind density; enters Debye length, Hall parameter, current-velocity relation, pressures, and energy budget.
T (wind temperature) = about 100 K
Assumed warm gas temperature; sets thermal speeds, mean free path, Debye length, and plasma beta.
B_struct (local magnetic structure strength) = 10 microG to 100 mG
Assumed interloping field; used to argue deflection efficacy, but no quantitative current calculation is provided.
v_wind = 1e5 to 1e6 m/s
Wind speed from the cited literature; used in the Lorentz force estimate, not in the current formula.
a (filament width) = about 0.5 pc
Observed typical width; enters Eq. (2), Eq. (17), pressure, and energy estimates.
L and w (filament length and pre-pinching width) = L about 100 pc, w about 10 pc
Chosen for the energy budget in Eq. (21); not derived from the model.
zeta (runaway electron fraction) = order unity
Introduced in Eq. (21) to scale the energy budget; only constrained to be non-negligible.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Generalized Bennett relation describes force balance in the filament
Used in Sec. I B and I C to argue that the axial electric field, inductance, and axial magnetic pressure can balance the pinch; imported from Witalis, Carlqvist, and Peratt without derivation for this astrophysical context.
domain assumption Z-pinch stability criteria (Suydam, kink, sausage) apply to the filament
Sec. I C cites Eqs. 20 and 21 of Benford to require Bz above 10 Bphi for an aspect ratio near 100; assumes laboratory pinch stability theory transfers to an open astrophysical geometry.
domain assumption Diocotron instability formula gives the e-folding length and the generated Bz
Sec. II C uses the Peratt and Shishlov formula to estimate the terminal axial field; the instability channel is explicitly speculative ('possibly via the diocotron channel').
domain assumption The plasma is collisionless and magnetically dominated so that ideal, force-free MHD applies
Sec. II A and II C use the large Hall parameter and low plasma beta to ignore collisions and pressure; this assumes the tenuous plasma does not resist the differential deflection.
ad hoc to paper A net axial current survives despite loop-closing field geometry
Sec. II A concedes that 'cancellations are likely as the field needs to close up into loops', yet the model assumes a coherent current of about 1e15 A for pinching. This is essential and unquantified.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Radio filaments as Z-pinched Galactic center wind." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M3QXQKVN

@misc{pith2026241215575,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Radio filaments as Z-pinched Galactic center wind},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M3QXQKVN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15575}
}

read the original abstract

In this brief note, we tentatively investigate the possibility that the radio filaments are produced when the Galactic center wind washes over magnetic field structures. The electrons and ions, with their disparate charge-to-mass ratios, are deflected differently by the magnetic field, and a current results. The current is subsequently Z-pinched into filaments, creating an electron-accelerating electric field along the way, because the magnetic field necessarily rearranges during the dynamic constriction process. An axial magnetic field also arises, possibly via the diocotron channel, to eventually quench the pinching and stabilize the filaments against a variety of instabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

[1]

The Population of the Galactic Center Filaments: Position Angle Distribution Reveal a Degree-scale Collimated Outflow from Sgr A* along the Galactic Plane

F. Yusef-Zadeh, R. G. Arendt, M. Wardle, and I. Hey- wood, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 949, L31 (2023), 2306.01071

work page Pith review arXiv 2023
[2]

Yusef-Zadeh, M

F. Yusef-Zadeh, M. Morris, and D. Chance, Nature 310, 557 (1984)

work page 1984
[3]

H. S. Liszt, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 293, L65 (1985)

work page 1985
[4]

Yusef-Zadeh, M

F. Yusef-Zadeh, M. Morris, O. B. Slee, and G. J. Nelson, The Astrophysical Journal 310, 689 (1986)

work page 1986
[5]

A. D. Gray, L. E. Cram, R. D. Ekers, and W. M. Goss, Nature 353, 237 (1991)

work page 1991
[6]

R. F. Haynes, R. T. Stewart, A. D. Gray, W. Reich, P. Re- ich, and U. Mebold, Astronomy & Astrophysics 264, 500 (1992)

work page 1992
[7]

C. C. Lang, M. Morris, and L. Echevarria, The Astrophys- ical Journal 526, 727 (1999), astro-ph/9906336

arXiv 1999
[8]

T. N. LaRosa, M. E. Nord, T. J. W. Lazio, and N. E. Kassim, The Astrophysical Journal 607, 302 (2004), astro- ph/0402061

work page arXiv 2004

Show all 73 references

[9]

Yusef-Zadeh, J

F. Yusef-Zadeh, J. W. Hewitt, and W. Cotton, The Astro- physical Journal Supplement Series 155, 421 (2004), astro- ph/0409292

2004
[10]

C. J. Law, F. Yusef-Zadeh, and W. D. Cotton, The As- trophysical Journal Supplement Series 177, 515 (2008), 0803.1412

2008 arXiv
[11]

Yusef-Zadeh, R

F. Yusef-Zadeh, R. G. Arendt, M. Wardle, I. Heywood, W. Cotton, and F. Camilo, The Astrophysical Journal Let- ters 925, L18 (2022), 2201.10552

2022 arXiv
[12]

Yusef-Zadeh, R

F. Yusef-Zadeh, R. G. Arendt, M. Wardle, S. Boldyrev, I. Heywood, W. Cotton, and F. Camilo, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society 515, 3059 (2022), 2206.10732

2022 arXiv
[13]

Yusef-Zadeh, R

F. Yusef-Zadeh, R. G. Arendt, M. Wardle, I. Heywood, and W. Cotton, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical So- ciety 517, 294 (2022), 2208.11589

2022 arXiv
[14]

Yusef-Zadeh, R

F. Yusef-Zadeh, R. G. Arendt, and M. Wardle, The Astro- physical Journal Letters 939, L21 (2022), 2210.04913

2022 arXiv
[15]

Lesch and W

H. Lesch and W. Reich, Astronomy and Astrophysics 264, 493 (1992)

1992
[16]

Rosner and G

R. Rosner and G. Bodo, The Astrophysical Journal Letter s 470, L49 (1996)

1996
[17]

Nicholls and E

J. Nicholls and E. T. Le Strange, The Astrophysical Jour nal 443, 638 (1995)

1995
[18]

S. N. Shore and T. N. LaRosa, Astrophysical Journal 521, 587 (1999), astro-ph/9904048

1999 arXiv
[19]

G. V. Bicknell and J. Li, The Astrophysical Journal Lett ers 548, L69 (2001), astro-ph/0011382

2001 arXiv
[20]

R. B. Dahlburg, G. Einaudi, T. N. LaRosa, and S. N. Shore, The Astrophysical Journal 568, 220 (2002), astro- ph/0112378

2002
[21]

Yusef-Zadeh, The Astrophysical Journal 598, 325 (2003), astro-ph/0308008

F. Yusef-Zadeh, The Astrophysical Journal 598, 325 (2003), astro-ph/0308008

2003 arXiv
[22]

Boldyrev and F

S. Boldyrev and F. Yusef-Zadeh, The Astrophysical Jour nal Letters 637, L101 (2006), astro-ph/0512373

2006 arXiv
[23]

Linden, D

T. Linden, D. Hooper, and F. Yusef-Zadeh, Astrophysica l Journal 741, 95 (2011), 1106.5493

2011 arXiv
[24]

W. E. Banda-Barrag´ an, E. R. Parkin, C. Federrath, R. M. Crocker, and G. V. Bicknell, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455, 1309 (2016), 1510.05356

2016 arXiv
[25]

Yusef-Zadeh and M

F. Yusef-Zadeh and M. Wardle, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490, L1 (2019), 1909.07409

2019 arXiv
[26]

Thomas, C

T. Thomas, C. Pfrommer, and T. Enßlin, The Astrophysica l Journal Letters 890, L18 (2020), 1912.08491

2020 arXiv
[27]

Sofue, Publications of the Astronomical Society of J apan 72, L4 (2020), 2001.11827

Y. Sofue, Publications of the Astronomical Society of J apan 72, L4 (2020), 2001.11827

2020 arXiv
[28]

E. R. Coughlin, C. J. Nixon, and A. Ginsburg, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501, 1868 (2021), 2010.13790

2021 arXiv
[29]

Sofue, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soc i- ety 518, 6273 (2023), 2210.17219

Y. Sofue, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Soc i- ety 518, 6273 (2023), 2210.17219

2023 arXiv
[30]

Gregori, F

G. Gregori, F. Miniati, D. Ryu, and T. W. Jones, The As- trophysical Journal 543, 775 (2000)

2000
[31]

R. M. Crocker, D. I. Jones, F. Aharonian, C. J. Law, F. Melia, and J. Ott, Monthly Notices of the Royal As- tronomical Society 411, L11 (2011), 1009.4340

2011 arXiv
[32]

Yusef-Zadeh, J

F. Yusef-Zadeh, J. W. Hewitt, M. Wardle, V. Tatischeﬀ, D. A. Roberts, W. Cotton, H. Uchiyama, M. Nobukawa, T. G. Tsuru, C. Heinke, et al., The Astrophysical Journal 762, 33 (2013), 1206.6882

2013 arXiv
[33]

T. Oka, T. R. Geballe, M. Goto, T. Usuda, Benjamin, J. McCall, and N. Indriolo, The Astrophysical Journal 883, 54 (2019), 1910.04762

2019
[34]

Le Petit, M

F. Le Petit, M. Ruaud, E. Bron, B. Godard, E. Roueﬀ, D. Languignon, and J. Le Bourlot, Astronomy & Astro- physics 585, A105 (2016), 1510.02221

2016 arXiv
[35]

M. G. Haines, Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion 53, 093001 (2011), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/53/9/093001

2011 doi
[36]

W. H. Bennett, Physical Review 45, 890 (1934)

1934
[37]

A. L. Peratt, Physics of the Plasma Universe (2015)

2015
[38]

Carlqvist and G

P. Carlqvist and G. F. Gahm, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 20, 867 (1992)

1992
[39]

Benford, The Astrophysical Journal 333, 735 (1988)

G. Benford, The Astrophysical Journal 333, 735 (1988)

1988
[40]

B. A. Trubnikov, Soviet Physics Uspekhi 33, 1061 (1990), URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1070/PU1990v033n12ABEH002667

1990 doi
[41]

Par´ e, N

D. Par´ e, N. O. Butterﬁeld, D. T. Chuss, J. A. Guerra, J. I . Iuliano, K. Karpovich, M. R. Morris, and E. J. Wollack, The Astrophysical Journal 969, 150 (2024), 2401.05317

2024 arXiv
[42]

Nishiyama, H

S. Nishiyama, H. Hatano, M. Tamura, N. Matsunaga, T. Yoshikawa, T. Suenaga, J. H. Hough, K. Sugitani, T. Na- gayama, D. Kato, et al., The Astrophysical Journal Letters 722, L23 (2010), 1009.0584

2010 arXiv
[43]

D. M. Par´ e, C. C. Lang, M. R. Morris, H. Moore, and S. A. Mao, The Astrophysical Journal 884, 170 (2019), 1909.08268

2019 arXiv
[44]

E. A. Witalis, Physical Review A 24, 2758 (1981)

1981
[45]

Carlqvist, Astrophysics and Space Science 144, 73 (1988)

P. Carlqvist, Astrophysics and Space Science 144, 73 (1988)

1988
[46]

Takakura, Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of Japan 12 (1960), URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:118389204

T. Takakura, Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of Japan 12 (1960), URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:118389204

1960
[47]

aki Kawabata, Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of Japan 16, 30 (1964), URL 7 https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:115780670

K. aki Kawabata, Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of Japan 16, 30 (1964), URL 7 https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:115780670

1964
[48]

Kai, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Jap an 17, 294 (1965)

K. Kai, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Jap an 17, 294 (1965)

1965
[49]

B. E. Meierovich, Physics Reports 104, 259 (1984)

1984
[50]

B. R. Suydam, Journal of Nu- clear Energy 7, 275 (1958), URL https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:121860252

1958
[51]

J. P. Freidberg, Reviews of Modern Physics 54, 801 (1982)

1982
[52]

B. A. Trubnikov, Soviet Physics Uspekhi 34, 1018 (1991)

1991
[53]

D. D. Ryutov, M. S. Derzon, and M. K. Matzen, Reviews of Modern Physics 72, 167 (2000)

2000
[54]

Inoue, T

M. Inoue, T. Takahashi, H. Tabara, T. Kato, and M. Tsuboi, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 36, 633 (1984)

1984
[55]

Tsuboi, T

M. Tsuboi, T. Kawabata, T. Kasuga, T. Handa, and T. Kato, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan 47, 829 (1995)

1995
[56]

Yusef-Zadeh, M

F. Yusef-Zadeh, M. Wardle, and P. Parastaran, The Astro - physical Journal Letters 475, L119 (1997)

1997
[57]

D. M. Pare, C. C. Lang, and M. R. Morris, arXiv e-prints arXiv:2408.16745 (2024), 2408.16745

2024 arXiv
[58]

D. M. Par´ e, C. C. Lang, and M. R. Morris, The Astrophys- ical Journal 941, 123 (2022), 2209.08153

2022 arXiv
[59]

Ferri` ere, Astronomy & Astrophysics 505, 1183 (2009), 0908.2037

K. Ferri` ere, Astronomy & Astrophysics 505, 1183 (2009), 0908.2037

2009 arXiv
[60]

R. M. Crutcher, D. A. Roberts, T. H. Troland, and W. M. Goss, The Astrophysical Journal 515, 275 (1999)

1999
[61]

Heiles, Y

C. Heiles, Y. H. Chu, and T. H. Troland, The Astrophysica l Journal Letters 247, L77 (1981)

1981
[62]

Morris, arXiv e-prints astro-ph/0701050 (2007), as tro- ph/0701050

M. Morris, arXiv e-prints astro-ph/0701050 (2007), as tro- ph/0701050

2007 arXiv
[63]

Buneman, Physical Review 115, 503 (1959)

O. Buneman, Physical Review 115, 503 (1959)

1959
[64]

L. P. Block, A double layer review (1977)

1977
[65]

D. D. Ryutov, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 43, 2363 (2015)

2015
[66]

Gold, in NASA Special Publication, edited by W

T. Gold, in NASA Special Publication, edited by W. N. Hess (1964), vol. 50, p. 389

1964
[67]

Alfven, Cosmical electrodynamics (1950)

H. Alfven, Cosmical electrodynamics (1950)

1950
[68]

Shishlov, R

A. Shishlov, R. Baksht, A. Labetsky, V. Oreshkin, A. Rousskikh, A. Fedunin, S. Chaikovsky, V. Kokshenev, N. Kurmaev, and F. Fursov, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 30, 498 (2002)

2002
[69]

Grainge, B

K. Grainge, B. Alachkar, S. Amy, D. Barbosa, M. Bommi- neni, P. Boven, R. Braddock, J. Davis, P. Diwakar, V. Fran- cis, et al., Astronomy Reports 61, 288 (2017)

2017
[70]

Wang, Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronom - ica 44, 783 (2014)

N. Wang, Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronom - ica 44, 783 (2014)

2014
[71]

M. Xue, W. Zhu, X. Wu, R. Xu, and H. Wang, Re- search in Astronomy and Astrophysics 23, 095005 (2023), 2307.03422

2023 arXiv
[72]

X. Chen, J. Yan, Y. Xu, L. Deng, F. Wu, L. Wu, L. Zhou, X. Zhang, X. Zhu, Z. Yang, et al., Chinese Journal of Space Science 43, 43 (2023)

2023
[73]

J. Silk, I. Crawford, M. Elvis, and J. Zarnecki, Philoso phical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 379, 20190560 (2021)

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

The Population of the Galactic Center Filaments: Position Angle Distribution Reveal a Degree-scale Collimated Outflow from Sgr A* along the Galactic Plane

F. Yusef-Zadeh, R. G. Arendt, M. Wardle, and I. Hey- wood, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 949, L31 (2023), 2306.01071

work page Pith review arXiv 2023

[2] [2]

Yusef-Zadeh, M

F. Yusef-Zadeh, M. Morris, and D. Chance, Nature 310, 557 (1984)

work page 1984

[3] [3]

H. S. Liszt, The Astrophysical Journal Letters 293, L65 (1985)

work page 1985

[4] [4]

Yusef-Zadeh, M

F. Yusef-Zadeh, M. Morris, O. B. Slee, and G. J. Nelson, The Astrophysical Journal 310, 689 (1986)

work page 1986

[5] [5]

A. D. Gray, L. E. Cram, R. D. Ekers, and W. M. Goss, Nature 353, 237 (1991)

work page 1991

[6] [6]

R. F. Haynes, R. T. Stewart, A. D. Gray, W. Reich, P. Re- ich, and U. Mebold, Astronomy & Astrophysics 264, 500 (1992)

work page 1992

[7] [7]

C. C. Lang, M. Morris, and L. Echevarria, The Astrophys- ical Journal 526, 727 (1999), astro-ph/9906336

arXiv 1999

[8] [8]

T. N. LaRosa, M. E. Nord, T. J. W. Lazio, and N. E. Kassim, The Astrophysical Journal 607, 302 (2004), astro- ph/0402061

work page arXiv 2004