Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 55 references

Traveling-wave solutions and structure-preserving numerical methods for a hyperbolic approximation of the Korteweg-de Vries equation

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that a specific implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta splitting for the hyperbolic KdV approximation is asymptotic preserving and shows how to conserve its modified energy, while also classifying its traveling-wave solutions.

desk verdict Worth refereeing: strong numerical paper with a real but non-fatal gap between the formal AP proofs and the advertised stability claim, plus a rich traveling-wave catalog that is numerically convincing but not proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17117 v2 pith:VEKJ3TOF submitted 2024-12-22 math.NA cs.NA

Abhijit Biswas , David I. Ketcheson , Hendrik Ranocha , Jochen Schütz This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NA MSC 35Q5365L0665M0665M1265M70
keywords hyperbolicrelaxationapproximationKorteweg-deVriesequationtravelingwavesasymptotic-preservingschemesimplicit-explicitRunge-Kuttamethodssummation-by-partsoperatorsenergy-preservingdiscretizationsolitons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies KdVH, a hyperbolic approximation of the Korteweg-de Vries equation that replaces the third derivative with two auxiliary variables governed by relaxation equations. Its main mathematical content is a proof that a carefully chosen implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta splitting is asymptotic preserving: as the relaxation parameter $\tau$ tends to zero, the numerical solution converges to a consistent discretization of KdV. For type I methods this holds unconditionally for the $u$ component and, for globally stiffly accurate methods, for the auxiliary components $v$ and $w$; type II methods need well-prepared initial data. On the solution side, the paper shows that KdVH supports solitary waves that approach KdV solitons, plus additional periodic and peaked traveling waves reminiscent of other water-wave models. It also constructs spatial semidiscretizations based on summation-by-parts operators and uses entropy relaxation to make the fully discrete schemes energy-preserving.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the splitting $q_t=f(q)+g(q)$ of the KdVH system, with $f(q)=(-u u_x,0,0)^T$ and $g(q)=(-w_x,(v_x-w)/\tau,(-u_x+v)/\tau)^T$. The asymptotic-preservation argument works by inserting formal Hilbert expansions in powers of $\tau$ into the Runge-Kutta stage equations; invertibility of the implicit coefficient matrix $A$ forces $v\to u_x$ and $w\to v_x$ at leading order, and the $u$ update collapses to the same implicit-explicit discretization of KdV. The globally stiffly accurate property, meaning the last stage coincides with the step update, is what keeps the auxiliary variables on the equilibrium manifold. For energy conservation, the paper uses periodic summation-by-parts operators satisfying $MD+D^TM=0$ with split-form nonlinear terms, and then inserts an entropy relaxation parameter $\gamma_n$ into the time update to enforce preservation of the discrete modified energy.

What would settle it

Run a globally stiffly accurate type I method such as AGSA(3,4,2) on the KdVH system with well-prepared data at fixed $\Delta t$, and measure $\|v^n - D_-\eta^n\|_2$ as $\tau\to0$; Theorem 1 predicts this error is $O(\Delta t^p)$. If the observed error plateau is orders of magnitude larger than $\Delta t^p$ as $\tau$ decreases, the theorem's claim that GSA suffices for the auxiliary components is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that KdVH is a usable hyperbolic surrogate for KdV: its solitary waves converge to KdV solitons as $\tau\to0$, and its dispersion relation has a finite maximum speed that removes the unbounded phase speeds of KdV. The numerical core claim is Theorem 1: for the splitting that treats only the nonlinear convection explicitly and everything else implicitly, an implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta method of type I is always asymptotic preserving for the $u$ component, with $u^{n+1}-\eta(t_{n+1})=O(\Delta t^p)$ in the stiff limit; if the method is also globally stiffly accurate, the auxiliary components satisfy $v^{n+1}-\eta_x(t_{n+1})=O(\Delta t^p)$ and $w^{n+1}-\eta_{xx}(t_{n+1})=O(\Delta t^p)$. A parallel statement holds for globally stiffly accurate type II methods with well-prepared initial data. The paper also proves that upwind summation-by-parts spatial discretizations conserve the discrete mass and modified energy, and that the entropy relaxation technique extends this conservation to the fully discrete level.

Load-bearing premise

The asymptotic-preservation results for the auxiliary components assume the initial data are well prepared, meaning $v(0)=u_x(0)+O(\tau)$ and $w(0)=u_{xx}(0)+O(\tau)$, and the proof additionally assumes a formal Hilbert expansion in powers of $\tau$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The asymptotic-preserving property means a fixed discretization of KdVH can be run with a small but finite $\tau$ and still produce a consistent approximation of the KdV equation, so KdVH can be used as a hyperbolic surrogate in codes that need first-order fluxes or nonreflecting boundary conditions.
  • The globally stiffly accurate condition is not a technicality: without it, the auxiliary variables $v$ and $w$ fail to converge as $\tau\to0$, as shown in the paper's tables, so users who need derivatives of the solution must choose GSA methods.
  • The energy-preserving full discretizations give linear error growth over long times instead of quadratic, matching the known behavior of conservative integrators for KdV itself.
  • The newly identified peaked and left-going traveling waves are genuine solutions of KdVH but are not KdV solitons, so any simulation using KdVH as a KdV proxy must be aware that these extra solutions exist and may be dynamically stable.
  • The results transfer from finite difference to discontinuous Galerkin and Fourier spatial discretizations, since the analysis only requires the summation-by-parts structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the paper leaves implicit is that the finite maximum speed of KdVH soliton-like waves may act as a built-in regularization of KdV's unphysical arbitrarily fast solitons; the paper notes the speed bound but does not develop it as a modelling feature.
  • The reduction to the dispersive equation (11) suggests that the peaked traveling waves of KdVH could be compared quantitatively with exact solutions of integrable shallow-water models, a comparison not made here.
  • The same explicit/implicit splitting principle should transfer to other hyperbolized dispersive equations, where the equilibrium relations $v=u_x$, $w=u_{xx}$ are replaced by the corresponding algebraic constraints of the target model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a hyperbolic approximation of the Korteweg-de Vries equation (KdVH). In Section 2, the authors analyze traveling-wave solutions, showing that KdV-soliton-like solutions exist up to a maximum speed and numerically identifying other solitary and periodic waves, including peaked and left-going waves related to Camassa-Holm/Degasperis-Procesi models. In Section 3, they propose an ImEx-RK splitting (15) in which only the nonlinear convective term is explicit and all linear-derivative and relaxation terms are implicit. They prove asymptotic-preserving (AP) properties for type I and type II ImEx methods (Theorems 1 and 2), develop SBP-based energy-conserving semidiscretizations (Theorems 3 and 4), and use entropy relaxation to obtain fully discrete energy conservation. Section 4 provides extensive numerical evidence for the AP and energy-conservation properties, using finite difference, DG, and Fourier spatial discretizations. A reproducibility repository is provided.

Significance. The paper is valuable: it offers a practical route to solving KdV via a hyperbolic system while preserving energy, and it extends the AP methodology from classical relaxation systems to a third-order dispersive system. The energy-conservation proofs (Theorems 3 and 4) are clean, and the numerical experiments are thorough, comparing four type I and four type II methods and confirming the role of the globally-stiffly-accurate (GSA) property in the AP behavior of auxiliary variables. The connection to Camassa-Holm-type traveling waves is interesting and well illustrated. If the AP theorems are made rigorous, the methods would be a significant contribution to structure-preserving discretizations for hyperbolized dispersive PDEs. The reproducibility repository and the explicit discussion of well-prepared initial data are also strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.1 (Theorems 1 and 2)] The AP property defined in Definition 1 requires that the limiting discretization P^0_h be consistent and stable. However, the proofs of Theorems 1 and 2 assume the Hilbert expansions (23) for the numerical solution and stage vectors without justification, and they only verify that the leading-order terms satisfy the same algebraic scheme as the ImEx-RK method applied to KdV. No stability of the limiting scheme is established, and no argument is given that the expansions represent the actual discrete solution uniformly in tau for fixed Delta t. Since the theorem statements (19)-(20) are unconditional, they are stronger than what is proven; at present they establish consistency of the formal limit rather than the full AP property. Please either provide a validity/stability argument for the expansions or restate the results as formal AP statements with the Hilbert-expansion assumption included in the hypotheses and with the stability part of Definition 1 handled separately.
  2. [Section 3.1, proof of Theorem 2] In the proof of Theorem 2, the propagation of well-preparedness from time t_n to t_{n+1} is justified via the GSA property, but the key identity 'vn+1 = b^T A^{-1} vv = v(s)' is only sketched. For type II methods, the update (33c) involves the first stage q^(1)=q^n and the reduced matrices with hats; a complete derivation of the final-stage identity for the auxiliary components would remove ambiguity and make the induction argument explicit.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.2, proof of Theorem 4] In equation (59), the term 'wwwT DT+Muuu' appears to be a typesetting error; it should presumably read 'www^T M D_+ uuu'. The argument is correct, but the notation is confusing as printed.
  2. [Section 3.3, equation (61)] The inner product in formula (61) is not defined. Since the modified energy (47) is a weighted L2 norm with weights (1, tau, tau), and its discrete counterpart involves the mass matrix M, please state explicitly that the inner product in (61) is the corresponding weighted discrete inner product; otherwise the formula appears to conserve the standard Euclidean norm, which would not preserve I(q).
  3. [Section 3.1, after equation (15)] The sentence 'the system qt + gx = 0 is strictly hyperbolic' is unclear, since g is not a flux function but a differential operator. Please rephrase, for example by stating that the linear part of the system is hyperbolic in the sense of the eigenvalue analysis in Remark 2.
  4. [Section 2.2, Remark 1] The claim that the linearization of (11) is ill-posed for c tau > 0 is stated without derivation; a one-line justification (e.g., the dispersion relation of the linearized equation) would help the reader.
  5. [Section 2.1 and Remark 2] The statement that KdVH imposes a maximum speed on soliton-like waves is supported by the linear analysis at u=0 in Remark 2, but the precise condition c^2 < 1/tau under which the homoclinic orbit exists is derived in Section 2.1. Please connect these two statements explicitly.
  6. [Section 4.1, Tables 1-9] The estimated orders of convergence would be more informative if the fixed time step Delta t = 0.005 were stated in the table captions rather than only in the preceding text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the AP results are formal consistency limits; the only soft spot is an unproved Hilbert-expansion/stability step.

full rationale

The paper's central AP claims (Theorems 1 and 2) are derived by inserting the Hilbert expansion (23) into the stage equations (21)/(35) and matching powers of tau. The tau^{-1} equations invert A (type I) or use well-preparedness plus invertible A-hat (type II) to force v_0=(u_0)_x and w_0=(v_0)_x, after which the leading-order u-equation is exactly the same ImEx method applied to the KdV split (16). This is a consistency calculation, not a fit: no parameter is tuned to the errors reported in Tables 1-9, and the numerical experiments compare against independently computed KdV solutions. The formal expansion is assumed rather than justified, and Definition 1's stability requirement is not separately established for the limiting method; that is a correctness/rigor gap (visible also in Tables 1-2, where non-GSA methods lose v,w accuracy), but it is not a reduction of the result to its own input. Energy conservation is verified by direct differentiation of (47) and by SBP identities (48)-(49); entropy relaxation is imported as an external technique [35,45]. Traveling-wave results are derived from the ansatz (4) and ODE system (5)-(6), with the Petviashvili iteration used only to solve those equations. Self-citations appear ([7],[8],[36],[46]) but are not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. The omission of the proofs of Theorems 5-6 ("analogous ... omitted") is a presentation gap, not circularity. Overall: no circular step; the score reflects only the presence of minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivations rely on a small set of standard assumptions: formal Hilbert expansions for the stiff limit, well-prepared initial data (for type II AP), SBP operator properties, and well-posedness of the elliptic reduction (9). No constants are fitted to data; the example wave speeds and relaxation parameters are chosen by hand for illustrations. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • wave speed c = 1/3, 2, -1/2 in illustrative experiments
    Free parameter indexing traveling wave families; values chosen for plots, not fitted to a target.
  • relaxation parameter τ = 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 for waves; 1e-3 to 1e-10 for AP tests
    Model parameter inherited from the KdVH proposal; swept to demonstrate the τ→0 limit, not fitted.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption KdVH system (2) as the model under study, from Besse et al. 2022
    The paper takes the hyperbolized KdV system as given and builds on it; no re-derivation.
  • domain assumption Hilbert expansions (23) exist for u,v,w and stages in τ
    AP proofs in Theorems 1-2 compare leading-order terms in formal power series; convergence is assumed.
  • domain assumption Well-prepared initial data (32): v0 = u0_x + O(τ), w0 = u0_xx + O(τ)
    Required for type II AP in Theorem 2; without it, Tables 1-2 show v,w errors do not vanish.
  • standard math ImEx RK tableaus satisfy invertibility (type I A; type II Â) and GSA where stated
    Theorems 1-2 assume these algebraic properties of the RK coefficients; standard in the AP literature.
  • standard math Periodic diagonal-norm SBP operators satisfy M D + D^T M = 0 and upwind dissipation
    Theorems 3-4 use the SBP properties (48)-(49); operators from Mattsson 2017 etc.
  • domain assumption The elliptic operator I + α(1+α)∂² in (9) is invertible on the relevant space
    Section 2.2 asserts well-posedness of (9) without proof; the operator has a resonance at k²=1/(α(1+α)) for α>0.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Traveling-wave solutions and structure-preserving numerical methods for a hyperbolic approximation of the Korteweg-de Vries equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VEKJ3TOF

@misc{pith2026241217117,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Traveling-wave solutions and structure-preserving numerical methods for a hyperbolic approximation of the Korteweg-de Vries equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VEKJ3TOF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17117}
}
read the original abstract

We study the recently-proposed hyperbolic approximation of the Korteweg-de Vries equation (KdV). We show that this approximation, which we call KdVH, possesses a rich variety of solutions, including solitary wave solutions that approximate KdV solitons, as well as other solitary and periodic solutions that are related to higher-order water wave models, and may include singularities. We analyze a class of implicit-explicit Runge-Kutta time discretizations for KdVH that are asymptotic preserving, energy conserving, and can be applied to other hyperbolized systems. We also develop structure-preserving spatial discretizations based on summation-by-parts operators in space including finite difference, discontinuous Galerkin, and Fourier methods. We use the entropy relaxation approach to make the fully discrete schemes energy-preserving. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of these discretizations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17117 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Phase portrait of the KdVH traveling wave system ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of the analytical soliton solution ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Traveling wave solutions of the KdVH equation. These solutions have no counterpart in KdV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A schematic illustration of the AP property [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the solution of the KdV equation ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Error convergence for variables u (top row), v (middle row), and w (bottom row) for two relaxation parameters. The reference solutions uP , vP , and wP are obtained using a Petviashvili-type method and a periodic first-derivative SBP operator. The methods AGSA(3,4,2), …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Error growth profiles for the KdVH system up to time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Error growth profiles for the KdVH system with two values of the relaxation parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Error growth profiles for the KdVH system with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Petviashvili type methods for traveling wave computations: I

    Jorge ´Alvarez and Angel Dur´ an. Petviashvili type methods for traveling wave computations: I. analysis of convergence. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , 266:39–51, 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Dispersive nonlinear shallow-water equations

    M Antuono, V Liapidevskii, and M Brocchini. Dispersive nonlinear shallow-water equations. Studies in Applied Mathematics , 122(1):1–28, 2009

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    A hyperbolic reformulation of the Serre-Green-Naghdi model for general bottom topographies

    Caterina Bassi, Luca Bonaventura, Saray Busto, and Michael Dumbser. A hyperbolic reformulation of the Serre-Green-Naghdi model for general bottom topographies. Computers & Fluids, 212:104716, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Perfectly matched layers methods for mixed hyperbolic–dispersive equations

    Christophe Besse, Sergey Gavrilyuk, Maria Kazakova, and Pascal Noble. Perfectly matched layers methods for mixed hyperbolic–dispersive equations. Water Waves , 4(3):313–343, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing

    Jeff Bezanson, Alan Edelman, Stefan Karpinski, and Viral B Shah. Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM Review, 59(1):65–98, 2017

    2017

  6. [6]

    Accurate Solution of the Nonlinear Schr\"{o}dinger Equation via Conservative Multiple-Relaxation ImEx Methods

    Abhijit Biswas and David I Ketcheson. Accurate solution of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation via conservative multiple-relaxation ImEx methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.02324 , 2023

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Multiple-relaxation Runge Kutta methods for conservative dynamical systems

    Abhijit Biswas and David I Ketcheson. Multiple-relaxation Runge Kutta methods for conservative dynamical systems. Journal of Scientific Computing , 97(1):4, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Ketcheson, Hendrik Ranocha, and Jochen Sch¨ utz

    Abhijit Biswas, David I. Ketcheson, Hendrik Ranocha, and Jochen Sch¨ utz. Reproducibility repos- itory for ”Traveling-wave solutions and structure-preserving numerical methods for a hyperbolic approximation of the Korteweg-de Vries equation”. https://github.com/abhibsws/2024_kdvh_RR, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Asymptotic preserving methods for quasilinear hyperbolic systems with stiff relaxation: a review

    Sebastiano Boscarino and Giovanni Russo. Asymptotic preserving methods for quasilinear hyperbolic systems with stiff relaxation: a review. SeMA Journal , 81(1):3–49, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Convective wave breaking in the KdV equation

    Mats K Brun and Henrik Kalisch. Convective wave breaking in the KdV equation. Analysis and mathematical physics, 8:57–75, 2018

    2018

  3. [11]

    Camassa, D

    R. Camassa, D. D. Holm, and J. M. Hyman. A new integrable shallow water equation. Advances in Applied Mechanics , 31:1–33, 1994

    1994

  4. [12]

    Strongly non-linear Boussinesq-type model of the dynamics of internal solitary waves propagating in a multilayer stratified fluid

    AA Chesnokov, VE Ermishina, and V Yu Liapidevskii. Strongly non-linear Boussinesq-type model of the dynamics of internal solitary waves propagating in a multilayer stratified fluid. Physics of Fluids, 35(7), 2023. 26

    2023

  5. [13]

    Hyperbolic model for free surface shallow water flows with effects of dispersion, vorticity and topography

    Alexander Chesnokov and Trieu Hai Nguyen. Hyperbolic model for free surface shallow water flows with effects of dispersion, vorticity and topography. Computers & Fluids , 189:13–23, 2019

    2019

  6. [14]

    Finite propagation speed for the Camassa–Holm equation

    Adrian Constantin. Finite propagation speed for the Camassa–Holm equation. Journal of Mathe- matical Physics, 46(2), 2005

    2005

  7. [15]

    The hydrodynamical relevance of the Camassa–Holm and Degasperis–Procesi equations

    Adrian Constantin and David Lannes. The hydrodynamical relevance of the Camassa–Holm and Degasperis–Procesi equations. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 192:165–186, 2009

    2009

  8. [16]

    Makie.jl: Flexible high-performance data visualization for Julia

    Simon Danisch and Julius Krumbiegel. Makie.jl: Flexible high-performance data visualization for Julia. Journal of Open Source Software , 6(65):3349, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Accuracy and conservation properties in numerical in- tegration: the case of the Korteweg-de Vries equation

    J De Frutos and Jesus Maria Sanz-Serna. Accuracy and conservation properties in numerical in- tegration: the case of the Korteweg-de Vries equation. Numerische Mathematik , 75(4):421–445, 1997

    1997

  10. [18]

    A first order hyperbolic reformulation of the Navier-Stokes- Korteweg system based on the GPR model and an augmented Lagrangian approach

    Firas Dhaouadi and Michael Dumbser. A first order hyperbolic reformulation of the Navier-Stokes- Korteweg system based on the GPR model and an augmented Lagrangian approach. Journal of Computational Physics , 470:111544, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Extended Lagrangian approach for the defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.Studies in Applied Mathematics , 142(3):336–358, 2019

    Firas Dhaouadi, Nicolas Favrie, and Sergey Gavrilyuk. Extended Lagrangian approach for the defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.Studies in Applied Mathematics , 142(3):336–358, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Hyperbolic relaxation models for thin films down an inclined plane

    Firas Dhaouadi, Sergey Gavrilyuk, and Jean-Paul Vila. Hyperbolic relaxation models for thin films down an inclined plane. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 433:127378, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    The numerical integration of relative equilibrium solu- tions

    Angel Dur´ an and Jesus Maria Sanz-Serna. The numerical integration of relative equilibrium solu- tions. Geometric theory. Nonlinearity, 11(6):1547, 1998

    1998

  14. [22]

    The numerical integration of relative equilibrium so- lutions

    Angel Dur´ an and Jesus Maria Sanz-Serna. The numerical integration of relative equilibrium so- lutions. The nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , 20(2):235–261, 2000

    2000

  15. [23]

    An efficient hyperbolic relaxation system for dispersive non-hydrostatic water waves and its solution with high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes

    Cipriano Escalante, Michael Dumbser, and Manuel J Castro. An efficient hyperbolic relaxation system for dispersive non-hydrostatic water waves and its solution with high order discontinuous Galerkin schemes. Journal of Computational Physics , 394:385–416, 2019

    2019

  16. [24]

    A rapid numerical method for solving Serre–Green–Naghdi equations describing long free surface gravity waves

    N Favrie and S Gavrilyuk. A rapid numerical method for solving Serre–Green–Naghdi equations describing long free surface gravity waves. Nonlinearity, 30(7):2718, 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    Review of summation-by-parts operators with simultaneous approximation terms for the numerical solution of partial differential equations

    David C Del Rey Fern´ andez, Jason E Hicken, and David W Zingg. Review of summation-by-parts operators with simultaneous approximation terms for the numerical solution of partial differential equations. Computers & Fluids , 95:171–196, 2014

    2014

  18. [26]

    The design and implementation of FFTW3

    Matteo Frigo and Steven G Johnson. The design and implementation of FFTW3. Proceedings of the IEEE , 93(2):216–231, 2005

    2005

  19. [27]

    The conduit equation: hyperbolic ap- proximation and generalized Riemann problem

    Sergey Gavrilyuk, Boniface Nkonga, and Keh-Ming Shyue. The conduit equation: hyperbolic ap- proximation and generalized Riemann problem. Available at SSRN 4724161 , 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Hyperbolic approximation of the BBM equation

    Sergey Gavrilyuk and Keh-Ming Shyue. Hyperbolic approximation of the BBM equation. Nonlin- earity, 35(3):1447, 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    Dispersive nonlinear shallow-water equations: some preliminary numerical results

    Giovanna Grosso, Matteo Antuono, and Maurizio Brocchini. Dispersive nonlinear shallow-water equations: some preliminary numerical results. Journal of Engineering Mathematics , 67:71–84, 2010

    2010

  22. [30]

    Array programming with NumPy

    Charles R Harris, K Jarrod Millman, St´ efan J Van Der Walt, Ralf Gommers, Pauli Virtanen, David Cournapeau, Eric Wieser, Julian Taylor, Sebastian Berg, Nathaniel J Smith, Robert Kern, Matti Picus, Stephan Hoyer, Marten H van Kerkwijk, Matthew Brett, Allan Haldane, Jaime Fern´...

    2020

  23. [31]

    J. D. Hunter. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science & Engineering , 9(3):90–95, 2007

    2007

  24. [32]

    S. Jin. Asymptotic preserving (AP) schemes for multiscale kinetic and hyperbolic equations: A review. Rivista di Matematica della Universita Parma , 3:177–216, 2012

    2012

  25. [33]

    Asymptotic-preserving schemes for multiscale physical problems

    Shi Jin. Asymptotic-preserving schemes for multiscale physical problems. Acta Numerica, 31:415– 489, 2022. 27

    2022

  26. [34]

    Additive Runge–Kutta schemes for convection– diffusion–reaction equations

    Christopher A Kennedy and Mark H Carpenter. Additive Runge–Kutta schemes for convection– diffusion–reaction equations. Applied numerical mathematics , 44(1-2):139–181, 2003

    2003

  27. [35]

    Relaxation Runge–Kutta methods: Conservation and stability for inner-product norms

    David I Ketcheson. Relaxation Runge–Kutta methods: Conservation and stability for inner-product norms. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , 57(6):2850–2870, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    Approximation of arbitrarily high-order pdes by first-order hyperbolic relaxation

    David I Ketcheson and Abhijit Biswas. Approximation of arbitrarily high-order pdes by first-order hyperbolic relaxation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.16841 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Traveling wave solutions of the Degasperis–Procesi equation

    Jonatan Lenells. Traveling wave solutions of the Degasperis–Procesi equation. Journal of Mathe- matical Analysis and Applications , 306(1):72–82, 2005

    2005

  30. [38]

    Implicit-explicit relaxation Runge-Kutta methods: construction, analysis and applications to PDEs

    Dongfang Li, Xiaoxi Li, and Zhimin Zhang. Implicit-explicit relaxation Runge-Kutta methods: construction, analysis and applications to PDEs. Mathematics of Computation , 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    A new formulation of hyperbolic Navier- Stokes solver based on finite volume method on arbitrary grids

    Lingquan Li, Jialin Lou, Hong Luo, and Hiroaki Nishikawa. A new formulation of hyperbolic Navier- Stokes solver based on finite volume method on arbitrary grids. In 2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference, page 4160, 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    Diagonal-norm upwind SBP operators

    Ken Mattsson. Diagonal-norm upwind SBP operators. Journal of Computational Physics , 335:283– 310, 2017

    2017

  33. [41]

    A first-order hyperbolic system approach for dispersion

    Alireza Mazaheri, Mario Ricchiuto, and Hiroaki Nishikawa. A first-order hyperbolic system approach for dispersion. J. Comput. Phys. , 321(Supplement C):593–605, 2016

    2016

  34. [42]

    Implicit–explicit Runge–Kutta schemes and applications to hyperbolic systems with relaxation

    Lorenzo Pareschi and Giovanni Russo. Implicit–explicit Runge–Kutta schemes and applications to hyperbolic systems with relaxation. Journal of Scientific computing , 25:129–155, 2005

    2005

  35. [43]

    Mimetic properties of difference operators: Product and chain rules as for func- tions of bounded variation and entropy stability of second derivatives

    Hendrik Ranocha. Mimetic properties of difference operators: Product and chain rules as for func- tions of bounded variation and entropy stability of second derivatives. BIT Numerical Mathematics, 59(2):547–563, 06 2019

    2019

  36. [44]

    SummationByPartsOperators.jl: A Julia library of provably stable semidiscretiza- tion techniques with mimetic properties

    Hendrik Ranocha. SummationByPartsOperators.jl: A Julia library of provably stable semidiscretiza- tion techniques with mimetic properties. Journal of Open Source Software , 6(64):3454, 08 2021

    2021

  37. [45]

    General relaxation methods for initial-value problems with application to multistep schemes

    Hendrik Ranocha, Lajos L´ oczi, and David I Ketcheson. General relaxation methods for initial-value problems with application to multistep schemes. Numerische Mathematik , 146:875–906, 10 2020

    2020

  38. [46]

    A broad class of conservative numerical methods for dispersive wave equations

    Hendrik Ranocha, Dimitrios Mitsotakis, and David I Ketcheson. A broad class of conservative numerical methods for dispersive wave equations. Communications in Computational Physics , 29(4):979–1029, 02 2021

    2021

  39. [47]

    Ketcheson

    Hendrik Ranocha, Mohammed Sayyari, Lisandro Dalcin, Matteo Parsani, and David I. Ketcheson. Relaxation Runge-Kutta methods: Fully-discrete explicit entropy-stable schemes for the compress- ible Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , 42(2):A61...

    2020

  40. [48]

    Difference Methods for Boundary-Value Problems

    Robert D Richtmyer and Keith William Morton. Difference Methods for Boundary-Value Problems. John Wiley & Sons, New York, London, Sydney, 1967

    1967

  41. [49]

    Hyperbolic relaxation method for elliptic equations

    Hannes R R¨ uter, David Hilditch, Marcus Bugner, and Bernd Br¨ ugmann. Hyperbolic relaxation method for elliptic equations. Physical Review D , 98(8):084044, 2018

    2018

  42. [50]

    Sch¨ utz and S

    J. Sch¨ utz and S. Noelle. Flux splitting for stiff equations: A notion on stability.Journal of Scientific Computing, 64(2):522–540, 2015

    2015

  43. [51]

    Review of summation-by-parts schemes for initial-boundary- value problems

    Magnus Sv¨ ard and Jan Nordstr¨ om. Review of summation-by-parts schemes for initial-boundary- value problems. Journal of Computational Physics , 268:17–38, 2014

    2014

  44. [52]

    Advection-diffusion-reaction equations: hyperbolization and high-order ADER discretizations

    Eleuterio F Toro and Gino I Montecinos. Advection-diffusion-reaction equations: hyperbolization and high-order ADER discretizations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , 36(5):A2423–A2457, 2014

    2014

  45. [53]

    Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cour- napeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, St´ efan J

    Pauli Virtanen, Ralf Gommers, Travis E. Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cour- napeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, St´ efan J. van der Walt, Matthew Brett, Joshua Wilson, K. Jarrod Millman, Nikolay Mayorov, Andrew R. J. Nelso...

    2020

  46. [54]

    Nonlinear waves in integrable and nonintegrable systems

    Jianke Yang. Nonlinear waves in integrable and nonintegrable systems . SIAM, 2010

    2010

  47. [55]

    Zeifang, J

    J. Zeifang, J. Sch¨ utz, K. Kaiser, A. Beck, M. Luk´ aˇ cov´ a-Medvid’ov´ a, and S. Noelle. A novel full-Euler low Mach number IMEX splitting. Communications in Computational Physics , 27:292–320, 2020. 28 A Type I ImEx methods A.1 SSP2-ImEx(2,2,2) 0 0 0 1 1 0 1/2 1 /2 γ γ 0 1...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.