Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Dynamical quantum typicality: Simple method for investigating transport properties applied to the Holstein model

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read One randomly chosen pure quantum state can stand in for the thermal ensemble well enough to produce numerically exact, thermodynamic-limit mobilities for the Holstein model, including strong-coupling regimes where other exact methods fail.

desk verdict Solid QT benchmark paper for Holstein transport; main caveat is unquantified single-vector statistical error at finite times, which the paper half-admits. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17436 v2 pith:FCH4VGYN submitted 2024-12-23 cond-mat.str-el

Petar Mitrić This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords quantumtypicalityHolsteinmodelchargemobilityvertexcorrectionsdynamicalmean-fieldtheoryhierarchicalequationsofmotionopticalconductivitypolarontransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that dynamical quantum typicality—replacing a thermal average by the expectation value in one randomly chosen pure state—computes frequency-dependent mobility $\mu(\omega)$ for the Holstein model with what the author calls numerically exact accuracy, representative of the thermodynamic limit. The method succeeds in intermediate and strong electron-phonon coupling, including $\lambda=2$ with $\omega_0=1$, a regime where hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) cannot converge, and it agrees with quantum Monte Carlo wherever that benchmark is reliable. The same results are used to quantify vertex corrections: the bubble (dynamical mean-field theory) approximation still gives the right order of magnitude for DC mobility at strong coupling when $\omega_0=1$, but it misses a displaced Drude peak near the adiabatic limit $\omega_0=1/3$. This matters because QT is a simple, memory-lean route to exact finite-temperature transport that extends to Hamiltonians beyond Holstein, and because it shows exactly where the simplest diagrammatic approximation stops being reliable.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the stochastic trace identity for quantum typicality: any trace of an operator can be written as an expectation value over random vectors, so a thermal correlation function becomes an expectation value in one random pure state. Concretely, the current-current correlation function is evaluated as $C_{jj}(t)\approx \langle\psi_\beta(t)|j|\phi_\beta(t)\rangle/\langle\psi_\beta(t)|\psi_\beta(t)\rangle$, where $|\psi_\beta\rangle=e^{-\beta H/2}|\psi\rangle$ is a thermally filtered random state and both states are time-propagated with a fourth-order short-time expansion of $e^{-iHt}$ that stores only three vectors in memory. The statistical error of the trace estimate scales as $1/\sqrt{R\,d_{\rm eff}}$ with $d_{\rm eff}=\mathrm{Tr}[e^{-\beta(H-E_0)}]$, so a single random vector ($R=1$) is sufficient whenever the effective Hilbert-space dimension is large. The bubble approximation—conductivity computed from the single-particle propagator alone, without vertex corrections—is provided by dynamical mean-field theory, which the paper treats as the exact result without vertex corrections.

What would settle it

Run the QT calculation on the same lattice, temperature, and coupling with two or more independent random vectors and compare the time-resolved correlation functions in a regime where QT and HEOM disagree; if the discrepancy between methods depends on which random vector is used, the single-vector approximation is biased.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a single random vector suffices for the thermal trace in the current-current correlation function, so that $C_{jj}(t)=\langle j(t)j\rangle$ can be written as the overlap of two time-evolved, thermally filtered states and propagated to times long enough to extract $\mu(\omega)$. The evidence for accuracy is agreement with quantum Monte Carlo at short times, small optical-sum-rule errors, explicit convergence in phonon cutoff and lattice size, and agreement between two different random vectors on different lattices. The physical conclusion drawn from the converged data is that vertex corrections to mobility are modest for $\omega_0=1$—the bubble approximation keeps the correct order of magnitude of the DC mobility, with $\delta\mu^{\rm vtx}_{\rm dc}$ between about $-0.1$ and $-0.6$ depending on temperature—but become qualitatively important near the adiabatic limit: at $\omega_0=1/3$ the bubble result lacks the displaced Drude peak near $\omega\approx 2t_0$, twice the hopping amplitude, that appears in the exact solution and moves upward in frequency as coupling increases.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a single randomly chosen pure quantum state stands in for the full thermal ensemble while tracking the current operator over time; this was verified directly only at the initial instant, and for later times it is inferred from agreement between two different lattice sizes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • QT extends directly to other electron-phonon Hamiltonians, such as Peierls models or systems with nonlinear and anharmonic phonon couplings, by changing only how the Hamiltonian and current operator act on a vector.
  • Where both methods converge, QT and HEOM mobility results agree, so QT can serve as a check on HEOM at intermediate times; HEOM retains an advantage for DC mobilities at lower temperatures because it reaches larger lattices and longer propagation times.
  • Strong-coupling regimes inaccessible to HEOM, such as $\lambda=2$, $\omega_0=1$, become tractable for exact numerics, giving vertex-correction estimates that were previously missing.
  • Near the adiabatic limit the displaced Drude peak is an exact, robust feature of the mobility, so approximate transport theories must capture short-time localization to be qualitatively correct.
  • At low temperatures and weak coupling, QT is not competitive because the long electron mean free path demands lattice sizes too large for its Hilbert-space memory footprint.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the single-vector estimate is unbiased at finite times, QT becomes a default exact tool for finite-temperature transport in any system with sparse Hamiltonian and current matrices, since its three-vector memory footprint is much smaller than methods storing many auxiliary states.
  • The same QT-versus-DMFT comparison could be applied to spectral functions or two-particle response functions, where vertex corrections may be larger than in the mobility and the bubble failure near the adiabatic limit should be even more pronounced.
  • A practical error bar for future QT studies could be obtained by running several random vectors in exactly the regimes where QT and HEOM disagree; agreement among independent vectors would directly test the load-bearing statistical assumption.
  • Because the displaced Drude peak is tied to transient localization, the converged QT data could be used to extract a temperature- and coupling-dependent localization time, connecting the exact numerics to the analytic transient-localization picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies dynamical quantum typicality (QT) with a single random vector and a Runge-Kutta time stepper to compute the current-current correlation function, frequency-dependent mobility, and diffusion constant of the one-dimensional Holstein model. Results are benchmarked against HEOM and QMC data and used to assess vertex corrections by comparing QT with DMFT. The paper claims highly accurate, effectively numerically exact results representative of the thermodynamic limit, including strong-coupling regimes inaccessible to HEOM, and reports that the bubble (DMFT) approximation gives the correct order of magnitude for DC mobility at ω0=1 but fails qualitatively near the adiabatic limit by missing the displaced Drude peak.

Significance. The work addresses a practically important problem: obtaining converged finite-temperature transport coefficients for electron-phonon models. The convergence analysis with respect to phonon truncation, lattice size, and Runge-Kutta time step is unusually careful, and the comparison with QMC in regimes where QMC has small error bars is a genuine strength. The data are openly available, the method is conceptually simple and parameter-free, and the vertex-correction analysis for strong coupling is a useful contribution. However, the central claim of numerical exactness rests on the single-vector stochastic trace approximation, whose statistical error is quantified only for the static quantity Cjj(t=0), not for the time-dependent correlator over the propagation interval. Since the manuscript's own supplemental material acknowledges a likely single-vector inaccuracy in a regime used to claim superiority over HEOM, the statistical-convergence question is load-bearing and needs to be addressed before the central claim can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV and Eq. (11); SM Sec. VI and Sec. VII A] The central assertion that the single-vector QT results are 'highly accurate (i.e., numerically exact)' is not backed by a finite-time statistical-error estimate. The scaling check in SM Sec. VI (Fig. S4) applies only to the static quantity Cjj(t=0); for the time-dependent correlator, the only support is agreement between two lattices with different random vectors in the insets of Figs. 1–5, which conflates finite-size convergence with statistical convergence. The side note in SM Sec. VII A explicitly admits 'some slight incurabilities' for the N=11, λ=1/2, T=1 run with deff≈1485.6, which is exactly the run used in Fig. 1(a1) to claim that QT is more accurate than HEOM. Please report standard errors obtained from multiple independent random vectors for representative regimes, or otherwise quantify the single-vector error over the full propagation interval before asserting numerical exactness.
  2. [Eq. (18) and SM Fig. S11] The new physical results on vertex corrections are reported without statistical uncertainty. For ω0=1, λ=2, T=1, Table S1 gives deff≈1812.8, implying a single-vector relative error scale of about 2.3% for static traces, and the reported δμ_vtx_dc values in SM Fig. S11 (for example -0.591 at T=1) carry no error bars. Since μ_dc is extracted from D(t) at finite propagation times where saturation is imperfect, the uncertainty in μ_QT_dc and in δμ_vtx_dc may be larger than this static estimate. Please provide error estimates for μ_QT_dc and δμ_vtx_dc, or otherwise demonstrate that single-vector fluctuations are negligible for these quantities.
  3. [Sec. III B 1 and SM Fig. S5] The claim that QT is more accurate than HEOM for Cjj(t) in the λ=1/2, T=1 regime is not independently arbitrated by QMC at T=1; the QMC-based arbitration is emphasized for T=5. In the same paragraph the author concedes that HEOM is more accurate for the DC mobility in this regime because D(t) has not saturated for the N=11 lattice. The statement 'QT is indeed more accurate in this case' should therefore either be softened or supported by an independent benchmark in the time window where QT and HEOM disagree (t≈10).
minor comments (4)
  1. [SM Sec. V] There is a typo in the sentence 'the the contribution corresponding to basis vectors with large number of phonons is suppressed'; 'the the' should be 'the'.
  2. [SM Sec. VII A] The word 'incurabilities' should be 'inaccuracies', and in Figs. S1–S3 the phrase 'tick vertical dashed line' should read 'thick vertical dashed line'.
  3. [Sec. II C, Eq. (9)] The statement that the random variables have 'arbitrary variance' should specify nonzero finite variance, and the choice of Gaussian distribution should be stated before rather than after Eq. (9).
  4. [Sec. III A, item (iv)] The assertion that convergence with respect to the single random vector 'was checked both in Sec. B of SM, and in Sec. III B of the main text' should be rephrased, because Sec. B validates only Cjj(t=0) and the two-lattice comparison in the main text is not itself a statistical-error check.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central QT derivation is self-contained, and the flagged single-vector caveat is a statistical-accuracy issue rather than a circular one.

full rationale

The paper's claimed derivation chain runs from the Kubo formulas, Eqs. (3)-(4), through the stochastic trace representation, Eqs. (9)-(11), to the computed Cjj(t) and mu(omega). At no point is a target quantity inserted back into its own definition: a single Gaussian vector |psi> replaces the thermal trace with the literature error scale O(1/sqrt(R deff)) (Ref. 68), and the SM (Sec. VI, Fig. S4) numerically checks that scaling for Cjj(t=0). No parameter is fitted to HEOM, QMC, or DMFT in order to produce the QT curves; the HEOM and QMC benchmarks are independent algorithms with published error bars, and although Ref. [38] is co-authored by the present author, the QMC data are not constructed from Eq. (11) and are externally checkable. The DMFT comparison is likewise independent: DMFT is solved analytically in the impurity model, so the vertex-correction measure delta_mu_vtx_dc of Eq. (18) is a genuine difference between two separate calculations, not a renamed input. The admitted SM 'Side Note' after Fig. S5 - that for N=11, lambda=1/2, T=1 'there probably are some slight incurabilities' from using only a single random vector - is an honest limitation on statistical accuracy in one specific run; it concerns whether one realized value of the estimator is reliable, not whether the estimator was derived from the quantity it predicts. The M-, N-, dt-, and R-convergence checks are nontrivial probes independent of the final mobility value. Hence no step reduces to its own input, and the paper is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to the transport data; physical parameters (ω0, λ, T) and numerical cutoffs (N, M, dt) are fixed by the problem or by convergence tests. The central assumptions are the typicality concentration bound, the phonon truncation, and the fidelity of the Runge-Kutta propagator, plus the prior literature claim that DMFT is accurate for the 1D Holstein bubble.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math For large effective dimension d_eff, the expectation value with respect to one random vector approximates the thermal trace with relative error O(1/sqrt(R d_eff)) (typicality).
    Invoked in Sec. II C and II D to justify single-vector QT (Eqs. 10, 11). The SM Sec. VI verifies the 1/sqrt(d_eff) scaling numerically only for Cjj(t=0) in one regime; the time-dependent case is assumed by analogy.
  • domain assumption The phonon Hilbert space can be truncated to at most M phonons with negligible bias because states with many phonons are suppressed by the Boltzmann factor e^{-βH/2}.
    Used in Sec. II A and SM Sec. V; checked by increasing M until results converge. Necessary for finite-dimensional numerical treatment.
  • domain assumption Runge-Kutta time propagation with dt=0.01 and nRK=4 is a faithful approximation to e^{-iHdt} for the times and energies studied.
    Sec. III A; verified in SM Fig. S7 for one regime by comparison with dt=0.001.
  • domain assumption A single random vector is sufficient to estimate the time-dependent current-current correlator Cjj(t) with negligible statistical error.
    This is the load-bearing statistical premise. Verified indirectly via agreement of QT results on two lattice sizes using different random vectors (insets of Figs. 1-5) and for Cjj(0) in SM Sec. VI; no direct variance estimate for finite t is given.
  • domain assumption DMFT in 1D Holstein is highly accurate for the single-particle Green's function, so the bubble approximation is the exact result without vertex corrections.
    Sec. II E, citing Ref. [17]. Used to define δμ_vtx_dc in Eq. (18). The paper relies on prior literature for the accuracy of DMFT in 1D.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dynamical quantum typicality: Simple method for investigating transport properties applied to the Holstein model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FCH4VGYN

@misc{pith2026241217436,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dynamical quantum typicality: Simple method for investigating transport properties applied to the Holstein model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FCH4VGYN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17436}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the transport properties of the Holstein model using the numerically exact quantum typicality (QT) approach. Roughly speaking, QT exploits the fact that even a single, randomly chosen pure state can effectively represent the full statistical ensemble in a high-dimensional Hilbert space. This allows us to compute frequency-dependent mobilities, representative of the thermodynamic limit, that are well-converged with respect to all numerical parameters. Our results are compared against other numerically exact methods, and used to analyze the contribution of vertex corrections to frequency-dependent mobility. The promising accuracy and efficiency of the QT approach suggest its applicability to a broader class of Hamiltonians.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17436 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1.Comparison of (a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Comparison of (a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Comparison of (a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Charge transport limited by nonlocal electron-phonon interaction. II. Numerically exact quantum dynamics in the slow-phonon regime

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the slow-phonon one-dimensional Peierls model, carrier diffusion is achieved from the superdiffusive side after a transient subdiffusive phase, and the mobility shows both a zero-frequency peak and a dip at the pho...

  2. Charge transport limited by nonlocal electron-phonon interaction. I. Hierarchical equations of motion approach

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HEOM auxiliaries are expressed through phonon operators, the generalized Wick theorem is proved, and exact mobility is computed for the 1D Peierls model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    1(a 1) and 1(a 2)

    Weak-intermediate and intermediate couplings The results for weak-intermediate coupling regime λ = 1/2, moderate temperature T = 1 and phonon fre- quency ω0 = 1 are presented in Figs. 1(a 1) and 1(a 2). In Fig. 1(a1) we observe an excellent agreement between all methods. A small discrepancy in the current-current correlation function Cjj (t) between QT an...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (1b) from Ref

    Strong couplings For λ = 2 and ω0 = 1, the renormalized electron mass (at T = 0) is about 10 times larger than band mass; see Fig. (1b) from Ref. [17] or Fig. 3 from Ref. [72]. This is why this is considered a strong coupling regime. The corresponding transport properties, for two differ- ent temperatures, T = 1, 10, are examined in Fig. 3. Such strong in...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Approaching adiabatic limit Near the adiabatic limit ( ω0 = 1/3), the results for the weak-intermediate ( λ = 1 /2), intermediate ( λ = 1), and strong coupling regime ( λ = 2) are presented in Figs. 4 and 5. The results are analogous to those we already obtained for ω0 = 1: we see that the current- current correlation functions (from all methods) are in e...

    work page

  4. [4]

    M. P. Marder, Condensed matter physics(John Wiley & Sons, 2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    Jacoboni, Theory of Electron Transport in Semi- conductors: A Pathway from Elementary Physics to Nonequilibrium Green Functions(Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)

    C. Jacoboni, Theory of Electron Transport in Semi- conductors: A Pathway from Elementary Physics to Nonequilibrium Green Functions(Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    J. M. Ziman, Electrons and Phonons: The Theory of Transport Phenomena in Solids (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Troisi, Charge transport in high mobility molecu- lar semiconductors: Classical models and new theories, Chem

    A. Troisi, Charge transport in high mobility molecu- lar semiconductors: Classical models and new theories, Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 2347 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    J.-J. Zhou, O. Hellman, and M. Bernardi, Electron- phonon scattering in the presence of soft modes and elec- tron mobility in srtio 3 perovskite from first principles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 226603 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Friedman, Electron-phonon interaction in organic molecular crystals, Phys

    L. Friedman, Electron-phonon interaction in organic molecular crystals, Phys. Rev. 140, A1649 (1965)

    1965

  2. [10]

    S. H. Glarum, Electron mobilities in organic semiconduc- tors, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 1577 (1963)

    1963

  3. [11]

    Zhou and M

    J.-J. Zhou and M. Bernardi, Predicting charge transport in the presence of polarons: The beyond-quasiparticle regime in SrTiO 3, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033138 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Ciuchi, S

    S. Ciuchi, S. Fratini, and D. Mayou, Transient localiza- tion in crystalline organic semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 83, 081202 (2011)

    2011

  5. [13]

    Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes

    R. Kubo, Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. General theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957)

    1957

  6. [14]

    Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Kluwer Academic, New York, 2000)

    G. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Kluwer Academic, New York, 2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    Bertini, F

    B. Bertini, F. Heidrich-Meisner, C. Karrasch, T. Prosen, R. Steinigeweg, and M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Finite-temperature transport in one-dimensional quantum lattice models, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025003 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Prodanovi´ c and N

    N. Prodanovi´ c and N. Vukmirovi´ c, Charge carrier mo- bility in systems with local electron-phonon interaction, Phys. Rev. B 99, 104304 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Fratini, D

    S. Fratini, D. Mayou, and S. Ciuchi, The transient local- ization scenario for charge transport in crystalline organic materials, Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 2292 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Troisi and G

    A. Troisi and G. Orlandi, Charge-transport regime of crystalline organic semiconductors: Diffusion limited by thermal off-diagonal electronic disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 086601 (2006)

    2006

  11. [19]

    J. E. Runeson, T. J. G. Drayton, and D. E. Manolopou- los, Charge transport in organic semiconductors from the mapping approach to surface hopping, J. Chem. Phys. 161, 144102 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Mitri´ c, V

    P. Mitri´ c, V. Jankovi´ c, N. Vukmirovi´ c, and D. Tanaskovi´ c, Cumulant expansion in the Holstein model: Spectral functions and mobility, Phys. Rev. B 107, 125165 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Mitri´ c, V

    P. Mitri´ c, V. Jankovi´ c, N. Vukmirovi´ c, and D. Tanaskovi´ c, Spectral functions of the Holstein polaron: Exact and approximate solutions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 096401 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Fratini and S

    S. Fratini and S. Ciuchi, Dynamical mean-field theory of transport of small polarons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 256403 (2003)

    2003

  15. [23]

    Fratini and S

    S. Fratini and S. Ciuchi, Optical properties of small po- larons from dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B 74, 075101 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    Ortmann, F

    F. Ortmann, F. Bechstedt, and K. Hannewald, Theory of charge transport in organic crystals: Beyond Holstein’s small-polaron model, Phys. Rev. B 79, 235206 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    Cheng and R

    Y.-C. Cheng and R. J. Silbey, A unified theory for charge-carrier transport in organic crystals, J. Chem. 10 Phys. 128, 114713 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    J. H. Fetherolf, D. Goleˇ z, and T. C. Berkelbach, A unifi- cation of the Holstein polaron and dynamic disorder pic- tures of charge transport in organic crystals, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021062 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    G. L. Goodvin, A. S. Mishchenko, and M. Berciu, Op- tical Conductivity of the Holstein polaron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 076403 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    Jakliˇ c and P

    J. Jakliˇ c and P. Prelovˇ sek, Lanczos method for the calculation of finite-temperature quantities in correlated systems, Phys. Rev. B 49, 5065 (1994)

    1994

  21. [29]

    W. Li, J. Ren, and Z. Shuai, Finite-temperature TD- DMRG for the carrier mobility of organic semiconduc- tors, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 4930 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Y. Ge, W. Li, J. Ren, and Z. Shuai, Computational method for evaluating the thermoelectric power factor for organic materials modeled by the Holstein model: A time-dependent density matrix renormalization group formalism, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 6437 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Jansen, J

    D. Jansen, J. Bonˇ ca, and F. Heidrich-Meisner, Finite- temperature optical conductivity with density-matrix renormalization group methods for the Holstein polaron and bipolaron with dispersive phonons, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155129 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Schubert, G

    G. Schubert, G. Wellein, A. Weisse, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, Optical absorption and activated transport in polaronic systems, Phys. Rev. B 72, 104304 (2005)

    2005

  25. [33]

    Jakliˇ c and P

    J. Jakliˇ c and P. Prelovˇ sek, Finite-temperature proper- ties of doped antiferromagnets, Adv. Phys. 49, 1 (2000)

    2000

  26. [34]

    Prelovˇ sek and J

    P. Prelovˇ sek and J. Bonˇ ca, Ground state and finite temperature Lanczos methods, in Strongly Correlated Systems: Numerical Methods, edited by A. Avella and F. Mancini (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidel- berg, 2013) pp. 1–30

    2013

  27. [35]

    Rammal, A

    H. Rammal, A. Ralko, S. Ciuchi, and S. Fratini, Tran- sient localization from the interaction with quantum bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 266502 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Wang and Y

    Y.-C. Wang and Y. Zhao, Diagrammatic quantum Monte Carlo toward the calculation of transport proper- ties in disordered semiconductors, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 204116 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    and [34], respectively. In addition, we also perform the DMFT calculations, but only for a strong electron- phonon coupling, as this is the only regime where vertex corrections were not previously analyzed in Ref. [38]. Before presenting the main results in Sec. III B, we firs...

  30. [38]

    Weiße, G

    A. Weiße, G. Wellein, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, The kernel polynomial method, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 275 (2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    Miladi´ c and N

    S. Miladi´ c and N. Vukmirovi´ c, Method for obtaining polaron mobility using real and imaginary time path- integral quantum Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. B107, 184315 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    A. S. Mishchenko, N. Nagaosa, G. De Filippis, A. de Candia, and V. Cataudella, Mobility of Holstein polaron at finite temperature: An unbiased approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 146401 (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    Jankovi´ c, Holstein polaron transport from numeri- cally “exact” real-time quantum dynamics simulations, J

    V. Jankovi´ c, Holstein polaron transport from numeri- cally “exact” real-time quantum dynamics simulations, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 094113 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Jankovi´ c, P

    V. Jankovi´ c, P. Mitri´ c, D. Tanaskovi´ c, and N. Vuk- mirovi´ c, Vertex corrections to conductivity in the Hol- stein model: A numerical-analytical study, Phys. Rev. B 109, 214312 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Jankovi´ c, Charge transport limited by nonlocal electron-phonon interaction

    V. Jankovi´ c, Charge transport limited by nonlocal electron-phonon interaction. I. Hierarchical equations of motion approach, arXiv:2501.05054 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Jankovi´ c, Charge transport limited by nonlo- cal electron-phonon interaction

    V. Jankovi´ c, Charge transport limited by nonlo- cal electron-phonon interaction. II. Numerically ex- act quantum dynamics in the slow-phonon regime, arXiv:2501.05055 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Heitmann, J

    T. Heitmann, J. Richter, D. Schubert, and R. Steinigeweg, Selected applications of typicality to real-time dynamics of quantum many-body systems, Z. Naturforsch., A: Phys. Sci. 75, 421 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    F. Jin, D. Willsch, M. Willsch, H. Lagemann, K. Michielsen, and H. De Raedt, Random state technol- ogy, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90, 012001 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Bartsch and J

    C. Bartsch and J. Gemmer, Dynamical typicality of quantum expectation values, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 110403 (2009)

    2009

  40. [48]

    Reimann, Dynamical typicality of isolated many- body quantum systems, Phys

    P. Reimann, Dynamical typicality of isolated many- body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E 97, 062129 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    Steinigeweg, J

    R. Steinigeweg, J. Herbrych, F. Pollmann, and W. Brenig, Typicality approach to the optical conduc- tivity in thermal and many-body localized phases, Phys. Rev. B 94, 180401 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Richter and R

    J. Richter and R. Steinigeweg, Combining dynamical quantum typicality and numerical linked cluster expan- sions, Phys. Rev. B 99, 094419 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Monnai and A

    T. Monnai and A. Sugita, Typical pure states and nonequilibrium processes in quantum many-body sys- tems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 094001 (2014)

    2014

  44. [52]

    Sugiura and A

    S. Sugiura and A. Shimizu, Thermal pure quantum states at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 240401 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    Sugiura and A

    S. Sugiura and A. Shimizu, Canonical thermal pure quantum state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 010401 (2013)

    2013

  46. [54]

    Holstein, Studies of polaron motion : Part I

    T. Holstein, Studies of polaron motion : Part I. The molecular-crystal model, Annals of Physics 8, 325 (1959)

    1959

  47. [55]

    T. A. Elsayed and B. V. Fine, Regression relation for pure quantum states and its implications for efficient computing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 070404 (2013)

    2013

  48. [56]

    Steinigeweg, J

    R. Steinigeweg, J. Gemmer, and W. Brenig, Spin- current autocorrelations from single pure-state propaga- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 120601 (2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    Ragni, T

    S. Ragni, T. Hahn, Z. Zhang, N. Prokof’ev, A. Kuklov, S. Klimin, M. Houtput, B. Svistunov, J. Tempere, N. Na- gaosa, C. Franchini, and A. S. Mishchenko, Polaron with quadratic electron-phonon interaction, Phys. Rev. B107, L121109 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    C. P. J. Adolphs and M. Berciu, Single-polaron proper- ties for double-well electron-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. B 89, 035122 (2014)

    2014

  51. [59]

    Errea, M

    I. Errea, M. Calandra, C. J. Pickard, J. Nelson, R. J. Needs, Y. Li, H. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, and F. Mauri, High-Pressure Hydrogen Sulfide from First Principles: A Strongly Anharmonic Phonon-Mediated Superconduc- tor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 157004 (2015)

    2015

  52. [60]

    Houtput and J

    M. Houtput and J. Tempere, Beyond the fr¨ ohlich hamil- tonian: Path-integral treatment of large polarons in an- harmonic solids, Phys. Rev. B 103, 184306 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    S. N. Klimin, J. Tempere, M. Houtput, S. Ragni, T. Hahn, C. Franchini, and A. S. Mishchenko, Analytic method for quadratic polarons in nonparabolic bands, Phys. Rev. B 110, 075107 (2024). 11

    2024

  54. [62]

    Ranalli, C

    L. Ranalli, C. Verdi, L. Monacelli, G. Kresse, M. Ca- landra, and C. Franchini, Temperature-Dependent An- harmonic Phonons in Quantum Paraelectric KTaO 3 by First Principles and Machine-Learned Force Fields, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies 6, 2200131 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Houtput, L

    M. Houtput, L. Ranalli, C. Verdi, S. Klimin, S. Ragni, J. Tempere, and C. Franchini, First-principles the- ory of nonlinear long-range electron-phonon interaction, arXiv:2412.09456 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    See Supplemental Material for additional numerical re- sults and discussions

  57. [65]

    A. K. Saibaba, A. Alexanderian, and I. C. Ipsen, Ran- domized matrix-free trace and log-determinant estima- tors, Numer. Math. 137, 353 (2017)

    2017

  58. [66]

    Girard, A fast ‘Monte-Carlo cross-validation’ proce- dure for large least squares problems with noisy data, Numer

    A. Girard, A fast ‘Monte-Carlo cross-validation’ proce- dure for large least squares problems with noisy data, Numer. Math. 56, 1 (1989)

    1989

  59. [67]

    M. F. Hutchinson, A stochastic estimator of the trace of the influence matrix for Laplacian smoothing splines, Commun. Stat. - Simul. Comput. 18, 1059 (1989)

    1989

  60. [68]

    Hams and H

    A. Hams and H. De Raedt, Fast algorithm for finding the eigenvalue distribution of very large matrices, Phys. Rev. E 62, 4365 (2000)

    2000

  61. [69]

    Iitaka and T

    T. Iitaka and T. Ebisuzaki, Random phase vector for calculating the trace of a large matrix, Phys. Rev. E 69, 057701 (2004)

    2004

  62. [70]

    R. A. Meyer, C. Musco, C. Musco, and D. P. Woodruff, Hutch++: Optimal stochastic trace estimation, in Pro- ceedings of the Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms (SOSA) (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2021) pp. 142–155

    2021

  63. [71]

    E. N. Epperly, J. A. Tropp, and R. J. Webber, Xtrace: Making the most of every sample in stochastic trace es- timation, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Appli- cations 45, 1 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Schnack, J

    J. Schnack, J. Richter, and R. Steinigeweg, Accuracy of the finite-temperature Lanczos method compared to sim- ple typicality-based estimates, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013186 (2020)

    2020

  65. [73]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozen- berg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996)

    1996

  66. [74]

    Ciuchi, F

    S. Ciuchi, F. de Pasquale, S. Fratini, and D. Feinberg, Dynamical mean-field theory of the small polaron, Phys. Rev. B 56, 4494 (1997)

    1997

  67. [75]

    Jankovi´ c, Numerical study of the one-dimensional Holstein model using the momentum-space hierarchical equations of motion method (2023), Zenodo

    V. Jankovi´ c, Numerical study of the one-dimensional Holstein model using the momentum-space hierarchical equations of motion method (2023), Zenodo

    2023

  68. [76]

    P. E. Kornilovitch, Continuous-Time Quantum Monte Carlo Algorithm for the Lattice Polaron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5382 (1998)

    1998

  69. [77]

    Mitri´ c, V

    P. Mitri´ c, V. Dobrosavljevi´ c, and D. Tanaskovi´ c, Pre- cursors to anderson localization in the holstein model: Quantum and quantum-classical solutions, Phys. Rev. B 111, L161105 (2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    Fratini and S

    S. Fratini and S. Ciuchi, Bandlike motion and mobil- ity saturation in organic molecular semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 266601 (2009)

    2009

  71. [79]

    Mitri´ c, Data for ”Dynamical quantum typicality: Simple method for investigating transport properties ap- plied to the Holstein model” (2025), Zenodo

    P. Mitri´ c, Data for ”Dynamical quantum typicality: Simple method for investigating transport properties ap- plied to the Holstein model” (2025), Zenodo. 12 Supplemental material for: Dynamical quantum typicality: Simple method for investigating transport properties applied t...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.