Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Faces Speak Louder Than Words: Emotions Versus Textual Sentiment in the 2024 USA Presidential Election

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.18031 v2 pith:IZFPF343 submitted 2024-12-23 cs.SI

classification cs.SI
keywords sentimentfacialtextualanalysisexpressionsmedianegativesocial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Sentiment analysis of textual content has become a well-established solution for analyzing social media data. However, with the rise of images and videos as primary modes of expression, more information on social media is conveyed visually. Among these, facial expressions serve as one of the most direct indicators of emotional content in images. This study analyzes a dataset of Instagram posts related to the 2024 U.S. presidential election, spanning April 5, 2024, to August 9, 2024, to compare the relationship between textual and facial sentiment. Our findings reveal that facial expressions align with text sentiment, where positive sentiment aligns with happiness, although neutral and negative facial expressions provide critical information beyond negative valence. Furthermore, during politically significant events such as Donald Trump's conviction and assassination attempt, posts depicting Trump showed a 12% increase in negative sentiment. Crucially, Democrats use their opponent's fear to depict weakness, whereas Republicans use their candidate's anger to depict resilience. Our research highlights the potential of integrating facial expression analysis with textual sentiment analysis to uncover deeper insights into social media dynamics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Visualizing Public Opinion on X: A Real-Time Sentiment Dashboard Using VADER and DistilBERT

    econ.GN 2025-04 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A VADER-plus-DistilBERT ensemble is reported with 87.6% accuracy on a manually labeled tweet set, but the evaluation set is the same set used to tune the ensemble weight, and no artifacts are released.

Pith tools