Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Generalized Mean Absolute Directional Loss for Machine Learning Trading Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.18405 v2 pith:IZBOYXTN submitted 2024-12-24 q-fin.CP q-fin.TR

classification q-fin.CPq-fin.TR
keywords lossmodelgmadllearningdirectionalevaluationmachinemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The article presents and evaluates a custom loss function designed specifically for machine learning models used in algorithmic trading. Regardless of the selected asset class and the level of model complexity, the proposed Generalized Mean Absolute Directional Loss (GMADL) function produces superior results and has better numerical properties during optimization than classic regression and classification based loss functions. Better results correspond to higher risk-weighted returns based on buy and sell signals derived from forecasts generated by models trained using GMADL. In practice, GMADL improves model evaluation by aligning the learning objective with trading performance rather than generic error minimization or simple directional accuracy. Through additional parameterization, GMADL provides a flexible mechanism for adjusting the loss's sensitivity to different return magnitudes, which affects model evaluation consistency across various market regimes. This improves the selection of model configurations that are more consistent with performance-based criteria. Moreover, the implementation uses robust machine learning tools, including frameworks for hyperparameter tuning, architecture testing, and walk-forward optimization, to provide robust and scalable model evaluation across real-world financial data from different asset classes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools