Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 63 references

Study of the physical and chemical properties of dense clumps at different evolutionary stages in several regions of massive star and stellar cluster formation

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Twenty clumps in five massive star-forming regions show a tight mass–size correlation, and the heaviest ones appear to be held up by ~1 mG magnetic fields.

desk verdict A solid but modest clump catalog and abundance study; the virial and magnetic-support claims are overstretched relative to the fixed 20 K dust temperature. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.18506 v2 pith:SOD7BPRE submitted 2024-12-24 astro-ph.GA

A. G. Pazukhin , I. I. Zinchenko , E. A. Trofimova This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords denseclumpsmassivestarformationmolecularabundancesLarsonrelationsvirialparametermagneticfieldsastrodendroSCUBA850micron
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to characterise dense clumps across the evolutionary sequence of massive star formation, from quiescent submillimetre sources to young stellar objects and H ii regions. Using IRAM-30m molecular line spectra and 850 µm dust emission from the SCUBA Legacy catalogue, the authors identify 20 clumps in five regions and measure their masses, sizes, temperatures, line widths, virial states, and molecular abundances. The central result is a strong mass–size correlation with slope $3.3\pm0.36$ and Spearman rank coefficient $r_s=0.9$, and the suggestion that magnetic fields of order 1 mG provide the extra support that keeps the most massive clumps from collapsing. Establishing which clumps are gravitationally bound and what supports them matters because massive stars form in precisely such clumps, and the balance between gravity, turbulence, and magnetic fields determines whether and how quickly they collapse.

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on a pipeline that combines the astrodendro algorithm applied to SCUBA 850 µm dust emission to define clumps and their fluxes; a mass equation assuming a single dust temperature of 20 K, a gas-to-dust ratio of 100, and dust opacity $\kappa_\nu=1.82\,\mathrm{cm^2\,g^{-1}}$ at 850 µm; the HCN-to-HNC line ratio as a kinetic temperature indicator; the virial parameter $\alpha_{\rm vir}=5\sigma_{\rm tot}^2 R_{\rm eff}/(GM)$ to judge dynamical state; and the Crutcher B–n relation $B=B_0(n/10^4\,\mathrm{cm^{-3}})^{0.65}$ to estimate the magnetic field strength needed for support. Each step is load-bearing: the masses feed the mass–size relation and the virial parameters, the temperatures feed the line-width corrections and virial terms, and the magnetic-field estimate is what turns low virial parameters into a claim about magnetic support.

What would settle it

Measure the dust temperature of each of the 20 clumps from multi-wavelength SEDs (adding, for example, 350 and 500 micron data) and recompute clump masses and virial parameters; if the derived temperatures deviate from 20 K, recheck whether the mass–size slope of about 3.3 and the claim that only three clumps are bound survive. A more direct test is Zeeman or dust-polarisation observation of the most massive clumps to see whether their magnetic field strengths are actually around 1 mG.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the observed sample of 20 dense clumps forms a coherent physical picture in which mass is tightly tied to size ($M\propto R^{3.3\pm0.36}$, $r_s=0.9$, $p=6.2\times10^{-5}$), while line-width–size and line-width–mass correlations are weak ($r_s=0.16$ and $0.4$, respectively). Virial analysis finds that only three clumps are gravitationally bound ($\alpha_{\rm vir}<2$); the rest are pressure- or turbulence-dominated. The most massive clumps, those above roughly $100\,M_\odot$, fall in the region where the empirical Crutcher relation predicts magnetic field strengths around 1 mG, and the paper argues that such fields provide additional support against self-gravity. It also reports molecular abundances relative to H$_2$ of order $10^{-10}$–$10^{-8}$, with HCN the most abundant of the studied species and SiO the least, and notes that detection rates and line widths systematically increase from submillimetre clumps to YSOs and H ii regions.

Load-bearing premise

Every clump's dust is assumed to sit at one temperature, 20 K, when its 850 micron brightness is converted to a mass, and that mass feeds the mass–size correlation, the virial parameters, and the conclusion about which clumps are bound.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the tight mass–size relation holds for other samples, it provides a simple empirical predictor of clump mass from radius alone, useful for estimating masses where distance or flux calibration is uncertain.
  • The identification of only three bound clumps out of 20 implies that most massive-star-forming clumps at this scale are not in free-fall collapse, but are supported by turbulence, thermal pressure, or magnetic fields—an important constraint on star-formation timescales.
  • A magnetic field of about 1 mG, if confirmed, would mean that magnetic support is dynamically comparable to turbulence in the most massive clumps, changing how virial masses are interpreted in high-mass star formation.
  • The systematic increase of line widths and molecular detection rates with evolutionary stage suggests an observational clock: clump classification by submm/YSO/H ii status tracks real physical evolution in turbulence and chemistry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The steep slope of the mass–size relation, $3.3$ versus the Larson value of $1.9$, may be partly an artefact of the clump-extraction procedure: with a fixed surface-brightness threshold and background subtraction, larger clumps collect more integrated flux, which can inflate the slope; a test would be to recompute the relation with a different threshold or with aperture-matched fluxes.
  • If dust temperatures vary systematically across evolutionary stage—warmer in H ii regions—the constant 20 K assumption could distort both the mass–size slope and the virial parameters; the paper's own temperature range of 20–40 K suggests such a check is feasible with existing far-infrared data.
  • The magnetic-support suggestion could be tested directly: dust polarisation observations toward the three bound massive clumps should show ordered field morphology, and Zeeman measurements in CN or HI should yield line-of-sight fields approaching 1 mG if the hypothesis is correct.
  • The abundance enhancement by about an order of magnitude over earlier IRDC surveys may reflect genuine chemical evolution, but it could also be affected by the $40''$ smoothing and the use of line-of-sight H$_2$ column densities; comparing abundances computed from a common aperture and consistent H$_2$ column would clarify the comparison.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents IRAM-30m observations at 2 and 3-4 mm of ten molecular species toward five massive star-forming regions (L1287, S187, S231, DR 21(OH), NGC 7538), identifies 20 dust clumps with astrodendro on SCUBA 850 micron images, and classifies them as H II regions, YSOs, or submm-only sources. For each clump the authors derive masses, H2 column densities, kinetic temperatures from HCN/HNC ratios, virial parameters, and molecular abundances. The main claims are: no significant line width-size or line width-mass correlations; a strong mass-size correlation with Spearman rs = 0.9 and slope 3.3 +/- 0.36; three gravitationally bound clumps; a suggested ~1 mG magnetic support for the most massive clumps; and molecular abundances relative to H2 of about 1e-10 to 1e-8. The dynamical and magnetic-support conclusions depend on clump masses computed from Eq. (1) with a fixed dust temperature of 20 K, while the kinetic temperatures used elsewhere in the analysis range from 20 to 40 K.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper offers a useful multi-tracer census of clump properties across an evolutionary sequence in five well-known regions, including an unusually steep mass-size slope and a concrete list of candidate bound clumps. The analysis is transparent in its use of public catalogues and previously published HCN/HNC temperature and H2 column-density maps, and the central formulae are standard rather than fitted. The significance is moderated by the small sample (20 clumps, with few per source), the acknowledged systematic uncertainties in dust temperature and LTE/optical-depth assumptions, and the fact that the 1 mG magnetic-field claim is inferred from the Crutcher relation rather than measured.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.3, Eq. (1); §5.1, Eq. (3); Table 4] The fixed dust temperature Tdust = 20 K in Eq. (1) is inconsistent with the measured kinetic temperatures of 20-40 K that enter the same virial analysis through Eq. (4). Because the mass formula in Eq. (1) scales as [exp(16.93/Tdust) - 1]^-1, adopting Tdust = Tkin lowers the masses of the warmer clumps and raises alpha_vir by the inverse factor. For DR 21(OH)-2 (Tkin = 24.3 K) alpha_vir increases from about 1.7 to about 2.2, and for NGC 7538-2 (Tkin = 28.8 K) from about 2.4 to about 4.0; only NGC 7538-3 remains clearly subvirial (alpha_vir about 1.7). The Conclusion that three clumps are gravitationally bound and the Section 5.1 inference of roughly 1 mG magnetic support therefore rest on an untested temperature choice, bracketed but not removed by the authors' own factor-of-two caveat on alpha_vir. I ask the authors to propagate per-clump Tdust values (or a justified uniform choice) through Eq. (3) and to re-evaluate which clumps are bound and whether the magnetic-support statement retains statistical support.
  2. [§5.1 and Fig. 4c] The statement that magnetic fields of about 1 mG provide additional support is an interpretation rather than a measurement: it is based on the Crutcher B-n relation with assumed B0 = 150 microG and on the location of the most massive clumps in the mass-size plane, with no Zeeman or dust-polarization constraints. Given the temperature sensitivity described in the previous comment, the statistical basis for this suggestion is currently weak, reducing to one or two clumps at most. I recommend explicitly labeling this as a speculative consistency check rather than a headline result, and, if possible, estimating the critical mass-to-flux ratio or an Alfvenic Mach number to support or weaken the claim.
  3. [§4.1 and §5.1, Fig. 4c] The mass-size correlation is a central result, but M and Reff are not independent observables: both are derived from the same 850 micron map, with M obtained by summing the flux of a dendrogram leaf in Eq. (1) and Reff obtained as sqrt(A/pi) of that same leaf. The extraction thresholds min_value = 4 sigma and min_npix = FWHM require small leaves to have above-threshold surface brightness, which can artificially strengthen or steepen the M-Reff relation. The reported rs = 0.9 and slope 3.3 +/- 0.36 should be accompanied by a discussion of this selection effect, and ideally by a robustness test using an independent size estimate or a Monte Carlo injection of synthetic clumps.
  4. [§5.2, Eq. (5), Table D1] The abundance analysis assumes LTE, optically thin emission, Tex = Tkin, fixed isotopologue ratios from Eqs. (6)-(7), and H2 column densities taken from the authors' earlier paper [19] rather than re-derived here. The authors acknowledge order-of-magnitude systematics, but Figure 6 and the evolutionary-stage comparisons are presented without a quantitative propagation of these effects. A sensitivity test that varies Tex and the isotope ratios, and that quantifies the effect of using the unresolved H2 column-density map, would make the abundance trends substantially more convincing.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 3] The column header 'indentified' should read 'identified'.
  2. [Table 3] The table contains two separate footnotes labeled '(b)', one for luminosity and one for maser classes; these should be renumbered to avoid ambiguity.
  3. [§4.1 and Fig. 1 caption] The algorithm name is misspelled as 'astrodenro' in two places; it should be 'astrodendro'.
  4. [§5.1] The phrase 'magnetic field region (B > 0 microG)' is not meaningful as written; the red dashed lines in Fig. 4c correspond to B0 = 0, 150, and 300 microG and should be described accordingly.
  5. [Table D1] The entry '15.5 (nan)' for L1287-2 SO2 should be handled explicitly, for example by quoting an upper limit or explaining the non-detection in the text.
  6. [§2] 'ranged from38′′ to 18′′' is missing a space after 'from'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation chain uses independent dust-continuum and line observations with standard equations, and the self-citations to [18,19] are prior measurements, not inputs that make the conclusions true by definition.

full rationale

The paper's main results are (i) clump identification from SCUBA 850 micron dust emission, (ii) masses from Eq. (1) with a stated dust temperature and opacity, (iii) sizes and densities from the clump areas, (iv) kinetic temperatures from earlier work [19], and (v) virial parameters from Eq. (3). None of these steps is circular: the mass-size correlation is not imposed by the definitions, because Eq. (1) gives M proportional to integrated flux while Reff is set by the projected area, so the steep observed slope (3.3 ± 0.36) is an empirical property of the sample rather than an algebraic identity. The dust temperature is assumed to be 20 K, which is a physical assumption that would affect the absolute masses and virial parameters, but it is not a fitted parameter disguised as a prediction. The self-citations to [18] and [19] provide kinetic temperature and H2 column density maps derived from the same telescope data in prior published work; this is reused observational input, not a uniqueness theorem or an ansatz smuggled in to force the present conclusions. The magnetic-field-support discussion is an inference from the virial parameters and the Crutcher relation, and the paper itself acknowledges factor-of-two or larger systematic uncertainties in alpha_vir. Therefore, although the fixed 20 K dust temperature is a legitimate credibility concern, no step reduces by construction to its own inputs, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on standard assumptions about dust emission, LTE, and optically thin lines, plus literature distances and a fixed dust temperature, all of which affect the derived masses and dynamical states.

free parameters (3)
  • Dust temperature T_dust = 20 K
    Assumed constant for all clumps in Eq. (1) for mass estimation; chosen by hand, not measured per clump, and directly scales all masses.
  • Gas-to-dust ratio = 100
    Assumed in Eq. (1) following Kauffmann et al. 2008; affects mass estimates.
  • Dust opacity kappa_nu = 1.82 cm2/g at 850 um
    Taken from Ossenkopf and Henning 1994; uncertainty propagates into masses.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Optically thin dust emission and optically thin isotopologue lines
    Used for mass and column density derivations (Eqs. 1 and 5); if lines are optically thick, column densities are underestimated.
  • domain assumption Local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) with Tex = Tkin
    Column densities are computed assuming LTE and excitation temperature equal to kinetic temperature (Section 4.6).
  • domain assumption Distances from literature are correct
    Masses scale as distance squared, so distance errors directly affect all physical parameters (Table 1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Study of the physical and chemical properties of dense clumps at different evolutionary stages in several regions of massive star and stellar cluster formation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SOD7BPRE

@misc{pith2026241218506,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Study of the physical and chemical properties of dense clumps at different evolutionary stages in several regions of massive star and stellar cluster formation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SOD7BPRE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.18506}
}
abstract

Massive stars play an important role in the Universe. Unlike low-mass stars, the formation of these objects located at great distances is still unclear. It is expected to be governed by some combination of self-gravity, turbulence, and magnetic fields. In this work, we aim to study the chemical and physical conditions of dense clumps at different evolutionary stages. We performed observations towards 5 regions of massive star and stellar cluster formation (L1287, S187, S231, DR 21(OH), NGC 7538) with the IRAM-30m telescope. We covered the 2 and 3$-$4 mm wavelength bands and analysed the lines of HCN, HNC, HCO$^+$, HC$_3$N, HNCO, OCS, CS, SiO, SO$_2$, and SO. Using astrodendro algorithm on the 850 $\mu$m dust emission data from the SCUBA Legacy catalogue, we determined the masses, H$_2$ column densities, and sizes of the clumps. Furthermore, the kinetic temperatures, molecular abundances, and dynamical state were obtained. The Red Midcourse Space Experiment Source survey (RMS) was used to determine the clump types. A total of 20 clumps were identified. Three clumps were found to be associated with the Hii regions, 10 with young stellar objects (YSOs), and 7 with submillimetre emission. The clumps have typical sizes of about 0.2 pc and masses ranging from 1 to $10^{2}\,M_\odot$, kinetic temperatures ranging from 20 to 40 K and line widths of $\rm H^{13}CO^{+} (1-0)$ approximately 2 $\rm km\,s^{-1}$. We found no significant correlation in the line width$-$size and the line width$-$mass relationships. However, a strong correlation is observed in mass$-$size relationships. The virial analysis indicated that three clumps are gravitationally bound. Furthermore, we suggested that magnetic fields of about 1 mG provide additional support for clump stability. The molecular abundances relative to H$_2$ are approximately $10^{-10}-10^{-8}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.18506 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Maps of the dust emission according to the SCUBA Legacy catalogue at 850 µm. The clumps obtained using the astrodenro method are highlighted with contours and numbers. The source is indicated in the upper center of each panel. The green outline demonstrates the IRAM-30m map region. The beam size and the scale equivalent are shown in the lower left corner of each panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spectra are extracted towards clumps of L1287. Spectra for 13C isotopologues (blue colour) of HCN, HNC, and HCO+ and halved spectra for main isotopologues (orange colour) are shown in the first three columns. The system velocity is represented by a grey dashed line on each panel. The transitions are indicated at the top of each column. The clump identifiers are listed in the centre. The spectra of the other sources … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Maps of the integrated intensity, velocity and line width of the line J=1-0 H 13CO+ for L1287. The contours illustrate the derived clumps. The clump ids are the same as in Fig.1. The source is indicated in the upper left corner of each panel. The beam size and the scale equivalent are shown in the lower left corner of each panel. The maps of the other sources are presented in the Appendix (Fig. B1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relation of (a) σobs − Reff , (b) n(H2) − Reff and (c) M − Reff . The submm, YSO and H ii region clumps are shown in black, blue and red, respectively. The green line shows the fitting result. The line slopes are presented in each panel. The red line demonstrates the o…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relation of (a) σobs − M and (b) αvir − M. The submm, YSO and H ii region clumps are shown in black, blue and red, respectively. The green line indicates the fitting result. The line slopes are presented in each panel. The red line demonstrates the original Larson rela…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Averaged molecular abundances relative to H2 for different clump types. The submm, YSO, and H ii region clumps are shown in black, blue, and red, respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Bertoldi and C

    F. Bertoldi and C. F. McKee, Astrophys. J395, 140 (1992)

    work page 1992

  2. [1]

    Their formation and evolution are still poorly understood (e.g., [1])

    INTRODUCTION In spite of their short lifetime, high-mass stars (also OB stars,L >103 L⊙, M >8 M⊙) play an important role in the Universe. Their formation and evolution are still poorly understood (e.g., [1]). According to the review in [2], there are several evolutionary stages. Objects associated with the first phase of high-mass star formation are calle...

    work page 2019

  3. [2]

    The list of sources is given in Table 1

    OBSERVATIONAL DATA In September 2019, with the 30-m radio telescope of the Institut de Radioastronomie Mil- limétrique (IRAM), we observed five massive star forming regions at wavelengths of 2 and 3–4 mm (in the framework of the project 041-19). The list of sources is given in Table 1. Table 2 contains the list of the observed molecular lines with some sp...

    work page 2019

  4. [3]

    The spectra were fitted with Gaussian profiles using theLMFIT package [24]

    DATA REDUCTION The GILDAS/CLASS software3 was used for the data reduction. The spectra were fitted with Gaussian profiles using theLMFIT package [24]. In the analysis, integrated intensity was obtained from the Gaussian profile area with their errors as the fitting errors. For the spectra with hyperfine structure we assume that the widths of all component...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Clumps identification from dust emission To extract the clumps, we use Python Astrodendro4 [26]

    RESULTS 4.1. Clumps identification from dust emission To extract the clumps, we use Python Astrodendro4 [26]. A dendrogram is employed to represent a hierarchical data structure. A dendrogram consists of two types of structures: branches, which are structures which split into multiple sub-structures, and leaves, which are structures that have no sub-struc...

    work page

  6. [5]

    2" and "3

    DISCUSSION 5.1. Larson relations In [3] the relations between linewidth, cloud mass, volume density, and cloud size were derived. The Larson’s laws are as follows: (1) the velocity dispersion as a function of the cloud size,σ ∝ R0.38, (2) the velocity dispersion as a function of the cloud mass,σ ∝ M 0.2, and (3) the mean density as a function of the cloud...

    work page

  7. [6]

    We observed HCN, HNC, HCO+, HC3N, HNCO, OCS, CS, SiO, SO2, and SO lines with the IRAM-30m radio telescope

    CONCLUSIONS In this work, we have carried out a multi-line survey at 2 and 3–4 mm towards 5 regions of massive star and stellar cluster formation, in order to study the physical and chemical properties at different evolutionary stages. We observed HCN, HNC, HCO+, HC3N, HNCO, OCS, CS, SiO, SO2, and SO lines with the IRAM-30m radio telescope. The 850µm dust...

    work page

  8. [7]

    Three clumps were found to be associated with the Hii regions, 10 with YSOs, and 7 with submillimetre emission

    A total of 20 clumps were identified. Three clumps were found to be associated with the Hii regions, 10 with YSOs, and 7 with submillimetre emission. The clumps have sizes of typical about 0.2 pc and masses ranging from 1 to 100M⊙, kinetic temperatures ranging from 20 to 40 K and line widths ofH13CO+ (1–0) approximately 2 kms−1

    work page

Show all 63 references
  1. [8]

    However, a strong correlation is observed in the mass–size relationships

    We found no significant correlation in the line width–size and the line width–mass relation- ships. However, a strong correlation is observed in the mass–size relationships. The virial analysis indicated that three clumps are gravitationally bound. The virial parameter depends...

  2. [9]

    The average line widths are about 3 kms−1, with a minimum for C34S (2.4 kms −1) and a maximum for SiO (5.5 kms−1)

    The detection rates of molecular lines in clumps with YSO and Hii regions are higher than those in submm. The average line widths are about 3 kms−1, with a minimum for C34S (2.4 kms −1) and a maximum for SiO (5.5 kms−1). In general, line widths increase with 10 evolutionary st...

  3. [10]

    Motte, S

    F. Motte, S. Bontemps, and F. Louvet, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys56, 41 (2018), 1706.00118

    2018 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Zinnecker and H

    H. Zinnecker and H. W. Yorke, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys45, 481 (2007), 0707.1279

    2007 arXiv

  5. [12]

    R. B. Larson, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc194, 809 (1981)

    1981

  6. [13]

    P. M. Solomon, A. R. Rivolo, J. Barrett, and A. Yahil, Astrophys. J319, 730 (1987)

    1987

  7. [14]

    G. A. Fuller and P. C. Myers, Astrophys. J384, 523 (1992)

    1992

  8. [15]

    Caselli and P

    P. Caselli and P. C. Myers, Astrophys. J446, 665 (1995)

    1995

  9. [16]

    I. I. Zinchenko, Astronomy Letters26, 802 (2000)

    2000

  10. [17]

    M. H. Heyer and C. M. Brunt, Astrophys. J. Lett615, L45 (2004), astro-ph/0409420

    2004 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Traficante, A

    A. Traficante, A. Duarte-Cabral, D. Elia, G. A. Fuller, M. Merello, S. Molinari, N. Peretto, E. Schisano, and A. Di Giorgio, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc477, 2220 (2018), 1803.08929

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Kauffmann, T

    J. Kauffmann, T. Pillai, and P. F. Goldsmith, Astrophys. J779, 185 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Pillai, J

    T. Pillai, J. Kauffmann, J. C. Tan, P. F. Goldsmith, S. J. Carey, and K. M. Menten, Astrophys. J799, 74 (2015), 1410.7390

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Vasyunina, H

    T. Vasyunina, H. Linz, T. Henning, I. Zinchenko, H. Beuther, and M. Voronkov, Astron. Astrophys 527, A88 (2011), 1012.0961. 11

    2011 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Sanhueza, J

    P. Sanhueza, J. M. Jackson, J. B. Foster, G. Garay, A. Silva, and S. C. Finn, Astrophys. J756, 60 (2012), 1206.6500

    2012 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Gerner, H

    T. Gerner, H. Beuther, D. Semenov, H. Linz, T. Vasyunina, S. Bihr, Y. L. Shirley, and T. Henning, Astron. Astrophys 563, A97 (2014), 1401.6382

    2014 arXiv

  17. [25]

    J. M. Rathborne, J. S. Whitaker, J. M. Jackson, J. B. Foster, Y. Contreras, I. W. Stephens, A. E. Guzmán, S. N. Longmore, P. Sanhueza, F. Schuller,et al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust33, e030 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    J. S. Urquhart, C. Figura, F. Wyrowski, A. Giannetti, W. J. Kim, M. Wienen, S. Leurini, T. Pillai, T. Csengeri, S. J. Gibson,et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc484, 4444 (2019), 1901.03759

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    A. G. Pazukhin, I. I. Zinchenko, E. A. Trofimova, and C. Henkel, Astronomy Reports66, 1302 (2022), 2211.14063

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    A. G. Pazukhin, I. I. Zinchenko, E. A. Trofimova, C. Henkel, and D. A. Semenov, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc 526, 3673 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Di Francesco, D

    J. Di Francesco, D. Johnstone, H. Kirk, T. MacKenzie, and E. Ledwosinska, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser 175, 277 (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    S. L. Lumsden, M. G. Hoare, J. S. Urquhart, R. D. Oudmaijer, B. Davies, J. C. Mottram, H. D. B. Cooper, and T. J. T. Moore, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser208, 11 (2013), 1308.0134

    2013 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Sepúlveda, R

    I. Sepúlveda, R. Estalella, G. Anglada, R. López, A. Riera, G. Busquet, A. Palau, J. M. Torrelles, and L. F. Rodríguez, Astron. Astrophys644, A128 (2020), 2011.01651

    2020

  24. [32]

    H. S. P. Müller, F. Schlöder, J. Stutzki, and G. Winnewisser, Journal of Molecular Structure742, 215 (2005)

    2005

  25. [33]

    Newville, T

    M. Newville, T. Stensitzki, D. B. Allen, and A. Ingargiola,LMFIT: Non-Linear Least-Square Mini- mization and Curve-Fitting for Python , Zenodo (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Schneider, T

    N. Schneider, T. Csengeri, S. Bontemps, F. Motte, R. Simon, P. Hennebelle, C. Federrath, and R. Klessen, Astron. Astrophys520, A49 (2010), 1003.4198

    2010 arXiv

  27. [35]

    E. W. Rosolowsky, J. E. Pineda, J. Kauffmann, and A. A. Goodman, Astrophys. J679, 1338 (2008), 0802.2944

    2008 arXiv

  28. [36]

    S. E. Ragan, T. Henning, and H. Beuther, Astron. Astrophys559, A79 (2013), 1308.6157

    2013 arXiv

  29. [37]

    D. A. Ladeyschikov, O. S. Bayandina, and A. M. Sobolev, Astron. J158, 233 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Kauffmann, F

    J. Kauffmann, F. Bertoldi, T. L. Bourke, I. Evans, N. J., and C. W. Lee, Astron. Astrophys487, 993 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    Ossenkopf and T

    V. Ossenkopf and T. Henning, Astron. Astrophys291, 943 (1994)

    1994

  32. [40]

    Hirota, S

    T. Hirota, S. Yamamoto, H. Mikami, and M. Ohishi, Astrophys. J503, 717 (1998)

    1998

  33. [41]

    Hacar, A

    A. Hacar, A. D. Bosman, and E. F. van Dishoeck, Astron. Astrophys635, A4 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    J. G. Mangum and Y. L. Shirley, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac127, 266 (2015), 1501.01703

    2015 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Ginsburg, V

    A. Ginsburg, V. Sokolov, M. de Val-Borro, E. Rosolowsky, J. E. Pineda, B. M. Sipőcz, and J. D. Henshaw, Astron. J163, 291 (2022), 2205.04987

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Y. T. Yan, C. Henkel, C. Kobayashi, K. M. Menten, Y. Gong, J. S. Zhang, H. Z. Yu, K. Yang, J. J. 12 Xie, and Y. X. Wang, Astron. Astrophys670, A98 (2023), 2212.03252

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Pirogov, I

    L. Pirogov, I. Zinchenko, P. Caselli, L. E. B. Johansson, and P. C. Myers, Astron. Astrophys405, 639 (2003), astro-ph/0304469

    2003 arXiv

  38. [46]

    R. M. Crutcher, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys50, 29 (2012)

    2012

  39. [47]

    Singh, C

    A. Singh, C. D. Matzner, R. K. Friesen, P. G. Martin, J. E. Pineda, E. Rosolowsky, F. Alves, A. Chacón- Tanarro, H. H.-H. Chen, M. C.-Y. Chen,et al., Astrophys. J922, 87 (2021), 2108.05367

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Kauffmann and T

    J. Kauffmann and T. Pillai, Astrophys. J. Lett723, L7 (2010), 1009.1617

    2010 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Yu and J

    N. Yu and J. Xu, Astrophys. J833, 248 (2016), 1701.02068

    2016 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Wenger, F

    M. Wenger, F. Ochsenbein, D. Egret, P. Dubois, F. Bonnarel, S. Borde, F. Genova, G. Jasniewicz, S. Laloë, S. Lesteven,et al., Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl. Ser143, 9 (2000), astro-ph/0002110

    2000 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Ochsenbein, The vizier database of astronomical catalogues (1996), URL https://vizier.cds

    F. Ochsenbein, The vizier database of astronomical catalogues (1996), URL https://vizier.cds. unistra.fr

    1996

  44. [52]

    Ochsenbein, P

    F. Ochsenbein, P. Bauer, and J. Marcout, Astron. and Astrophys. Suppl. Ser143, 23 (2000), astro- ph/0002122

    2000

  45. [53]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gommers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Taylor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith,et al., Nature 585, 357 (2020), 2006.10256

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Astropy Collaboration, A. M. Price-Whelan, P. L. Lim, N. Earl, N. Starkman, L. Bradley, D. L. Shupe, A. A. Patil, L. Corrales, C. E. Brasseur,et al., Astrophys. J935, 167 (2022), 2206.14220

    2022 arXiv

  47. [55]

    J. D. Hunter, Computing in Science and Engineering9, 90 (2007)

    2007

  48. [56]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright,et al., Nature Methods17, 261 (2020), 1907.10121

    2020 arXiv

  49. [57]

    K. L. J. Rygl, A. Brunthaler, M. J. Reid, K. M. Menten, H. J. van Langevelde, and Y. Xu, Astron. As- trophys 511, A2 (2010), 0910.0150

    2010 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Russeil, C

    D. Russeil, C. Adami, and Y. M. Georgelin, Astron. Astrophys470, 161 (2007)

    2007

  51. [59]

    R. A. Burns, H. Imai, T. Handa, T. Omodaka, A. Nakagawa, T. Nagayama, and Y. Ueno, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc453, 3163 (2015), 1509.03110

    2015 arXiv

  52. [60]

    K. L. J. Rygl, A. Brunthaler, A. Sanna, K. M. Menten, M. J. Reid, H. J. van Langevelde, M. Honma, K. J. E. Torstensson, and K. Fujisawa, Astron. Astrophys539, A79 (2012), 1111.7023

    2012 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Moscadelli, M

    L. Moscadelli, M. J. Reid, K. M. Menten, A. Brunthaler, X. W. Zheng, and Y. Xu, Astrophys. J693, 406 (2009), 0811.0679

    2009 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Zavagno, L

    A. Zavagno, L. Deharveng, and J. Caplan, Astron. Astrophys281, 491 (1994)

    1994

  55. [63]

    =0.1 pc Fν [Jy beam−1] 0 2 4 6 L1287 12 3 1h23m30s 20s 10s 00s 61°52' 51' 50' 49' 48' Right Ascension Declination 22.9

    E. L. Wright, P. R. M. Eisenhardt, A. K. Mainzer, M. E. Ressler, R. M. Cutri, T. Jarrett, J. D. Kirkpatrick, D. Padgett, R. S. McMillan, M. Skrutskie,et al., Astron. J140, 1868 (2010), 1008.0031. 13 T able 1. List of sources Source RA(J2000) Dec(J2000) Vlsr d(a) Note (h:m:s) (...

    2010 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.