Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 61 references

Multipolar ferroelectricity in the Mott regime

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that nonuniform quadrupolar order alone, without magnetic dipole order, can generate a finite electric polarization in spin-orbit-coupled Mott insulators, extending ferroelectricity beyond the inverse…

desk verdict Real new mechanism with explicit cluster derivation, but the headline formula is not a single-valued function of the quadrupolar order it's credited to; needs a conceptual fix before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.18942 v2 pith:7U3RATO3 submitted 2024-12-25 cond-mat.str-el

Pengwei Zhao , Jiahao Yang , Gang v. Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 75.85.+t71.27.+a
keywords multipolarferroelectricityMottinsulatorquadrupolarorderimproperinverseDzyaloshinskii-Moriyamechanismspin-orbitcouplingJ=1localmomentsmultiferroics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish that improper ferroelectricity in Mott insulators does not require non-collinear magnetic dipole order. It develops a mechanism in which the electric polarization is carried instead by nonuniform magnetic quadrupole order, using the spin-orbit-entangled $J=1$ local moments of ions such as Fe$^{2+}$ ($3d^6$). In the dipole-free limit the inter-site polarization is shown to be $\tilde{P}_{\rm int} \sim \hat{x} \times (\hat{e}_1 \times \hat{e}_2)$, where $\hat{e}_i$ are the quadrupole-order directions. The same calculation recovers the inverse Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya result when dipole order is present, so the two mechanisms are two limits of one unified description. If correct, this expands the class of multiferroic materials to quadrupole-ordered magnets with no net dipole moment.

What carries the argument

The key object is the rank-two magnetic quadrupole tensor $Q_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}\{J_\mu,J_\nu\}-\frac{J^2}{3}\delta_{\mu\nu}$ on the $J=1$ manifold, together with the real-valued basis states $|x\rangle,|y\rangle,|z\rangle$ in which a general local state is a complex vector $b=(b_x,b_y,b_z)$. When $b$ is real the magnetic dipole $\langle J\rangle=-i b^*\times b$ vanishes while the five quadrupole components remain nonzero, which is the dipole-free regime the mechanism relies on. The calculation is a three-site cluster with $d^6$ ($J=1$) and $d^7$ ($J=1/2$) Fe configurations bridged by an oxygen $2p$ orbital, with hopping treated perturbatively and the electric polarization extracted from the hybridized wavefunction.

What would settle it

Measure the electric polarization of a candidate quadrupolar-ordered Mott insulator with zero net magnetization: if the polarization vanishes, or does not follow the predicted cross-product geometry when the quadrupole directions are changed, the mechanism as stated fails. A first-principles calculation that includes Jahn-Teller distortions and full crystal-field splitting would also settle whether the dipole-free $J=1$ ground state survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, reached through a minimal Fe-O-Fe cluster calculation, is that a finite electric polarization can be generated from non-uniform quadrupolar orders even in a system without non-collinear magnetic orders. For $J=1$ moments whose local states are dipole-free, the inter-site polarization reduces to $\tilde{P}_{\rm int} \sim \hat{x} \times (\hat{e}_1 \times \hat{e}_2)$, with $\hat{e}_i$ the unit vectors that set the quadrupole moment tensor $Q_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}\{J_\mu,J_\nu\}-\frac{J^2}{3}\delta_{\mu\nu}$. The onsite contributions likewise contain both dipole and quadrupole terms and are finite whenever the two Fe sites have different local moments. The paper shows that tuning a local quadratic coupling moves the system continuously between this pure multipolar limit and the conventional inverse Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya mechanism, with an intermediate regime containing both origins.

Load-bearing premise

The local d-electron ground states at each Fe site are taken to be exactly the spin-orbit-entangled $J=1$ ($d^6$) and $J=1/2$ ($d^7$) manifolds, with higher crystal-field levels and Jahn-Teller distortions small enough to ignore.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A Mott insulator with nonuniform quadrupole order and zero net magnetic dipole should show a finite electric polarization whose direction follows the cross product of the local quadrupole-direction unit vectors.
  • The conventional inverse Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya mechanism and the new quadrupolar mechanism are two limits of one framework, so mixed dipole-quadrupole states acquire corrections beyond the standard spin-current formula.
  • Because quadrupolar order can persist above the dipolar ordering temperature, quadrupolar ferroelectricity may survive at temperatures where ordinary magnetic-dipole ferroelectricity is already gone.
  • Candidate materials include spin-orbit-coupled Mott insulators with large effective moments, such as $4d/5d$ transition-metal oxides and $4f/5f$ magnets, where the multipolar correction should be included when assigning the origin of the polarization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: a clean experiment would be to probe a quadrupole-ordered insulator with zero net magnetization and check whether the polarization reverses when the two quadrupole axes are interchanged, a signature that distinguishes this mechanism from any dipole-based one.
  • Editorial inference: if the dipole-free mechanism holds, ferroelectricity no longer requires time-reversal-breaking order, which may allow electric-field control of a nonmagnetic multipolar state and separate ferroelectric from magnetic switching temperatures.
  • Editorial inference: the same perturbative machinery could be extended to octupolar and higher-rank order parameters, whose vector-product polarization formulas the paper does not work out explicitly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a mechanism for improper ferroelectricity in Mott insulators driven by high-rank multipolar, specifically quadrupolar, order, going beyond the inverse Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (IDM) mechanism. The authors construct the spin-orbit-entangled J=1 ground state of a d6 ion and compute the electric polarization of a minimal three-site Fe-O-Fe cluster containing one d6 and one d7 site, treating d-p hybridization perturbatively. They identify onsite and inter-site contributions and show that in the limit where the d6 local states are dipole-free (real coefficient vectors b_i), the inter-site polarization reduces to P̃_int ~ x̂ × (ê1 × ê2), which they interpret as a quadrupolar analogue of the IDM mechanism. They also recover the conventional IDM angular dependence when the d6 states are uniform and the d7 dipoles are non-collinear. The appendices provide explicit many-body wavefunctions and full polarization formulas.

Significance. If correct, the proposed mechanism would be a new route to improper ferroelectricity that does not require non-collinear magnetic dipole order, potentially relevant to spin-orbit-coupled d- and f-electron Mott insulators. The paper's strengths are its explicit microscopic construction: the many-body wavefunctions for d6, d7, and d8 configurations are given in closed form, the IDM limit is reproduced as a sanity check, and the final polarization formulas are analytic without fitted parameters. The main weakness is a sign/gauge ambiguity in the quadrupolar-order parameter, discussed below, which calls into question the central claim as formulated.

major comments (1)
  1. [Sec. IV, Eqs. (18)-(20) and Eq. (7)] Eq. (20) is not a single-valued function of the quadrupolar order parameter. For real b_i = ê_i, the quadrupole expectation value in Eq. (7) is ⟨Q_{μν}⟩_i = δ_{μν}/3 - ê_{iμ}ê_{iν}, invariant under ê_i → -ê_i, while the dipole moment in Eq. (6) vanishes for both choices; the states |ψ_i⟩ and -|ψ_i⟩ are the same ray. Nevertheless, Eq. (20), and more generally the mixed-site contributions in Eqs. (D7)-(D8), are odd in each b_i, so flipping ê_1 alone reverses the sign of the predicted polarization without changing any local multipolar order. Flipping both b_1 and b_2 leaves Eq. (20) invariant, but flipping only one does not, which is exactly the relative-phase ambiguity. The same pair of quadrupolar tensors Q_1 and Q_2 would thus yield two opposite polarizations. The root cause is that the cluster state in Eq. (10) contains a relative phase between |ϕ1, ψ2⟩ and |ψ1, ϕ2⟩ that is not captured by the local quadrupolar order parameters. The paper does not identify the additional order parameter (e.g., a bond order or an octupolar moment) that fixes this relative phase. As a result, the central claim that a finite electric polarization is generated purely from non-uniform quadrupolar orders is not established, and the mechanism should be attributed to the relative phase/order rather than to the quadrupole tensor alone. This is a load-bearing issue, not a material-specific or numerical one.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II.A] The text says 'magnetic dipoles and quadruples'; this should be 'quadrupoles'.
  2. [Sec. IV, after Eq. (19)] The sentence 'The first terms of P̃y_int and P̃y_int resemble...' contains a typo: the second symbol should be P̃z_int.
  3. [Eq. (10)] The perturbed state |Ψ⟩ is unnormalized; formally the polarization should be ⟨Ψ|er|Ψ⟩/⟨Ψ|Ψ⟩. Since ⟨Ψ|Ψ⟩ - 1 is O(Δ^{-2}) while the leading polarization terms are O(Δ^{-1}), the omission is harmless at leading order, but this should be stated explicitly.
  4. [Sec. III, Eq. (10)] All intermediate d-p charge-transfer states are assigned the same energy denominator Δ; a brief comment on this approximation and its expected range of validity would be helpful.
  5. [Sec. V] The claimed crossover from the inverse Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya mechanism to the pure multipolar mechanism as J1/J2 is varied is not explicitly demonstrated; the full expressions in App. D are given, but no interpolation or limiting sequence is shown.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the polarization is obtained from an explicit cluster Hamiltonian with external order-parameter inputs, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained. The J=1 single-ion states are constructed explicitly (Sec. II and App. B), the dipole and quadrupole expectation values are computed from these states (Eqs. 6-7), and the three-site cluster polarization is obtained by a first-order perturbative expansion of the hopping Hamiltonian (Secs. III-IV). The final expressions, including the quadrupolar limit P_tilde_int ~ x-hat x (e-hat_1 x e-hat_2), contain only the microscopic state vectors b_i and a_i and the hopping/overlap parameters; no parameter is fitted to the target material, and the comparison to Ga2-xFexO3 is only a zeroth-order magnitude estimate. The recovery of the inverse-Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya form in case (ii), Eq. (22), is a consistency check, not an input. The self-citations (Refs. 28, 35, 37, 43, 44, 54) concern standard single-ion physics, review-level spin-orbital background, and illustrative material classes; none carries the central claim. A separate mathematical concern that is not circularity: because the quadrupole tensor of Eq. (7) is unchanged by e-hat_i -> -e-hat_i while Eq. (20) changes sign under a single flip, the polarization is not a single-valued function of the quadrupolar order parameters alone; this is an internal-consistency issue, not a case of the prediction being equivalent to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation relies on a set of clearly stated single-ion and cluster assumptions: pure spin-orbit manifolds, negligible Jahn-Teller effect, a single charge-transfer energy Delta, no oxygen holes, no charge order, and first-order perturbation theory. These are typical for minimal model calculations in this field. The quadrupole moment is a standard observable, not an invented entity. The model parameters are not fitted to data, so there are no free parameters in the fitting sense.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The d6, d7, d8 configurations are described by pure J=1, J=1/2, and J=1/0 spin-orbit ground manifolds, with higher crystal-field levels neglected.
    Sec. II.A and App. B construct the ground states using only the t2g and eg orbitals and a single SOC splitting.
  • domain assumption Jahn-Teller distortion is negligible for the t2g orbitals of Fe2+.
    Sec. II.A: "we could safely neglect JT effects in our analysis up to the leading order."
  • ad hoc to paper All oxygen 2p to metal d charge-transfer intermediate states share a common energy denominator Delta.
    Sec. III, after Eq. (10): "The energy separation between a 2p orbital and d-orbitals is approximated as Delta."
  • domain assumption The cluster ground state has no net charge order, with equal superposition of the two d6/d7 configurations.
    Sec. III: "the net charge order is assumed to be absent", giving |Psi0> = (|phi1,psi2> + |psi1,phi2>)/sqrt(2).
  • domain assumption The oxygen 2p orbitals are fully occupied in the unperturbed state (no oxygen holes).
    Sec. III: "We have assumed the oxygen site is filled with electrons, i.e. absent of holes."
  • domain assumption First-order perturbation theory in H_hop/Delta is sufficient for the leading electric polarization.
    Sec. III-IV keep |Psi> to first order in 1/Delta and drop higher-order terms without an explicit error bound.
  • domain assumption The single-ion Hamiltonian H0 = J1 e dot J + J2 (e dot J)^2 with J1,J2>0 generates the local state; for J2>J1 the dipole-free quadrupolar ground state is realized.
    Sec. II.B and App. C; this is the physical setup that allows a pure quadrupolar state.
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics (Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Hund's rules, and first-order perturbation theory) is used throughout.
    App. B constructs the SOC eigenstates using CG coefficients; Sec. III-IV use perturbative expansion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multipolar ferroelectricity in the Mott regime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7U3RATO3

@misc{pith2026241218942,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multipolar ferroelectricity in the Mott regime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7U3RATO3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.18942}
}
read the original abstract

Ferroelectricity has been one major focus in modern fundamental research and technological application. We consider the physical origin of improper ferroelectricity in Mott insulating materials. Beyond the well-known Katsura-Nagaosa-Balatsky's inverse Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya mechanism for the noncollinearly ordered magnets, we point out the induction of the electric polarizations in the multipolar ordered Mott insulators. Using the multiflavor representation for the multipolar magnetic moments, we can show the crossover or transition from the pure inverse Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya mechanism to the pure multipolar origin for the ferroelectricity, and also incorporate the intermediate regime with the mixture of both origins. We expect our results to inspire a reexamination of ferroelectricity in the multipolar-ordered magnets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.18942 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A schematic diagram of the level splitting of the 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The corner-sharing octahedral cluster. The red solid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Thus, we can denote d6 as t4 2ge2 g

    d6 = t4 2ge2 g configuration For d6 electron configuration, there are 2 electrons in eg orbitals and 4 electrons in t2g orbitals. Thus, we can denote d6 as t4 2ge2 g. There are 3 possibilities to arrange the 4 electrons in t2g orbitals, giving rise to threefold orbital states. Since 6 electrons are more than half-filling, it is more convenient to use the ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Thus, we can denote d7 as t5 2ge2 g

    d7 = t5 2ge2 g configuration For d7 electron configuration, there are 2 electrons in eg orbitals and 5 electrons in t2g orbitals. Thus, we can denote d7 as t5 2ge2 g. There are 3 possibilities to arrange the 5 electrons in t2g orbitals, giving rise to threefold orbital states. In the hole representation, threefold orbital states are given by |d⟩ = D†|0⟩ =...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Thus, we can denote d7 as t4 2ge3 g

    d7 = t4 2ge3 g configuration After hopping, we can have d7 electron configuration as intermediate states, with 3 electrons in eg orbitals and 4 electrons in t2g orbitals. Thus, we can denote d7 as t4 2ge3 g. There are 3 possibilities to arrange the 4 electrons in t2g orbitals, giving rise to threefold orbital states. And 2 possibilities for 3 electrons in...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Thus, we can denote d8 as t6 2ge2 g

    d8 = t6 2ge2 g configuration After hopping, we can have d8 electron configuration as the intermediate state, with 2 electrons in eg orbitals and 6 electrons in t2g orbitals. Thus, we can denote d8 as t6 2ge2 g. There is only one possibility to arrange these electrons, giving rise to an orbital state |Lz = 0⟩ = d† 3z2−r2 d† x2−y2 |0⟩ . (B19) According to H...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Thus, we can denote d8 as t5 2ge3 g

    d8 = t5 2ge3 g configuration After hopping, we can also have d8 electron configuration as the intermediate state, with 3 electrons in eg orbitals and 5 electrons in t2g orbitals. Thus, we can denote d8 as t5 2ge3 g. There are three possible states to arrange 5 electrons in t2g orbitals and two possible states for 3 electrons in eg orbitals. In the hole re...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Baroni, P

    S. Baroni, P. Giannozzi, and A. Testa, Green’s-function approach to linear response in solids, Physical Review Letters 58, 1861 (1987)

    work page 1987

  7. [7]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polar- ization of crystalline solids, Physical Review B 47, 1651 (1993)

    work page 1993

  8. [8]

    Resta, Macroscopic Electric Polarization as a Geomet- ric Quantum Phase, Europhysics Letters 22, 133 (1993)

    R. Resta, Macroscopic Electric Polarization as a Geomet- ric Quantum Phase, Europhysics Letters 22, 133 (1993)

    work page 1993

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    Resta and D

    R. Resta and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of Polarization: A Modern Approach, in Physics of Ferroelectrics: A Mod- ern Perspective (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007) pp. 31–68

    2007

  2. [10]

    N. A. Spaldin, A beginner’s guide to the modern theory of polarization, Journal of Solid State Chemistry Polar Inorganic Materials: Design Strategies and Functional Properties, 195, 2 (2012)

    2012

  3. [11]

    B. A. Bernevig and T. L. Hughes, Topological Insulators and Topological Superconductors (Princeton University Press, 2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    Vanderbilt, Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    D. Vanderbilt, Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    D. M. Nenno, C. A. C. Garcia, J. Gooth, C. Felser, and P. Narang, Axion physics in condensed-matter systems, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 682 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    L. N. Bulaevskii, C. D. Batista, M. V. Mostovoy, and D. I. Khomskii, Electronic orbital currents and polarization in Mott insulators, Physical Review B 78, 024402 (2008)

    2008

  7. [15]

    Eerenstein, N

    W. Eerenstein, N. D. Mathur, and J. F. Scott, Multi- ferroic and magnetoelectric materials, Nature 442, 759 (2006)

    2006

  8. [16]

    C. Jia, S. Onoda, N. Nagaosa, and J. H. Han, Bond elec- tronic polarization induced by spin, Physical Review B 74, 224444 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    Katsura, N

    H. Katsura, N. Nagaosa, and A. V. Balatsky, Spin Cur- rent and Magnetoelectric Effect in Noncollinear Magnets, Physical Review Letters 95, 057205 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    Mostovoy, Ferroelectricity in Spiral Magnets, Physical Review Letters 96, 067601 (2006)

    M. Mostovoy, Ferroelectricity in Spiral Magnets, Physical Review Letters 96, 067601 (2006)

    2006

  11. [19]

    Murakawa, Y

    H. Murakawa, Y. Onose, S. Miyahara, N. Furukawa, and Y. Tokura, Ferroelectricity induced by spin-dependent metal-ligand hybridization in Ba2CoGe2O7, Physical Re- view Letters 105, 137202 (2010)

    2010

  12. [20]

    I. A. Sergienko and E. Dagotto, Role of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in multiferroic per- ovskites, Physical Review B 73, 094434 (2006)

    2006

  13. [21]

    Tokura, S

    Y. Tokura, S. Seki, and N. Nagaosa, Multiferroics of spin origin, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 076501 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Windsch, A

    W. Windsch, A. J. Freeman, H. Schmid. Magnetoelectric interaction phenomena in crystals. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers London 1975. £ 10.90, Kristall und Technik 11, K45 (1976)

    1976

  15. [23]

    Cheong and M

    S.-W. Cheong and M. Mostovoy, Multiferroics: A mag- netic twist for ferroelectricity, Nature Materials 6, 13 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    K. T. Delaney, M. Mostovoy, and N. A. Spaldin, Superexchange-Driven Magnetoelectricity in Magnetic Vortices, Physical Review Letters 102, 157203 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    Mostovoy, Multiferroics: Different routes to magne- toelectric coupling, npj Spintronics 2, 1 (2024)

    M. Mostovoy, Multiferroics: Different routes to magne- toelectric coupling, npj Spintronics 2, 1 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Mostovoy, A

    M. Mostovoy, A. Scaramucci, N. A. Spaldin, and K. T. Delaney, Temperature-Dependent Magnetoelectric Ef- fect from First Principles, Physical Review Letters 105, 087202 (2010)

    2010

  19. [27]

    Mostovoy, K

    M. Mostovoy, K. Nomura, and N. Nagaosa, Theory of Electric Polarization in Multiorbital Mott Insulators, Physical Review Letters 106, 047204 (2011)

    2011

  20. [28]

    J. B. Neaton, C. Ederer, U. V. Waghmare, N. A. Spaldin, and K. M. Rabe, First-principles study of spontaneous polarization in multiferroic BiFeO 3, Physical Review B 71, 014113 (2005)

    2005

  21. [29]

    N. A. Spaldin and R. Ramesh, Advances in magnetoelec- tric multiferroics, Nature Materials 18, 203 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    N. A. Spaldin and M. Fiebig, The Renaissance of Mag- netoelectric Multiferroics, Science 309, 391 (2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    B. B. Van Aken, T. T. M. Palstra, A. Filippetti, and N. A. Spaldin, The origin of ferroelectricity in magneto- electric YMnO3, Nature Materials 3, 164 (2004)

    2004

  24. [32]

    Massarelli, B

    G. Massarelli, B. Wu, and A. Paramekanti, Orbital edel- stein effect from density-wave order, Phys. Rev. B 100, 075136 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    Li, X.-P

    C.-K. Li, X.-P. Yao, and G. Chen, Writing and delet- ing skyrmions with electric fields in a multiferroic heterostructure, Physical Review Research 3, L012026 (2021)

    2021

  26. [34]

    Banerjee, S

    S. Banerjee, S. Humeniuk, A. R. Bishop, A. Saxena, and A. V. Balatsky, Multipolar multiferroics in 4d2/5d2 mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 111, L201107 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Lee and P

    S.-S. Lee and P. A. Lee, U(1) gauge theory of the hubbard model: Spin liquid states and possible application to κ- (BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 036403 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    O. I. Motrunich, Orbital magnetic field effects in spin liquid with spinon fermi sea: Possible application to κ- (ET)2Cu2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. B 73, 155115 (2006)

    2006

  29. [37]

    O. I. Motrunich, Variational study of triangular lattice spin-1/2 model with ring exchanges and spin liquid state in κ-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3, Phys. Rev. B 72, 045105 (2005)

    2005

  30. [38]

    Fazekas, Lecture Notes on Electron Correlation and Magnetism (World Scientific, 1999)

    P. Fazekas, Lecture Notes on Electron Correlation and Magnetism (World Scientific, 1999)

    1999

  31. [39]

    Maekawa, T

    S. Maekawa, T. Tohyama, S. E. Barnes, S. Ishihara, W. Koshibae, and G. Khaliullin, Physics of Transi- tion Metal Oxides , edited by M. Cardona, P. Fulde, K. Von Klitzing, R. Merlin, H.-J. Queisser, and H. St¨ ormer, Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Vol. 144 (Springer, ...

    2004

  32. [40]

    Chen, Quadrupole moments and their interactions in the triangular lattice antiferromagnet FeI 2, Phys

    G. Chen, Quadrupole moments and their interactions in the triangular lattice antiferromagnet FeI 2, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L032042 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Bai, S.-S

    X. Bai, S.-S. Zhang, Z. Dun, H. Zhang, Q. Huang, H. Zhou, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, F. Ye, C. D. Batista, and M. Mourigal, Hybridized quadrupolar ex- citations in the spin-anisotropic frustrated magnet FeI2, Nature Physics 17, 467 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Witczak-Krempa, G

    W. Witczak-Krempa, G. Chen, Y. B. Kim, and L. Ba- lents, Correlated Quantum Phenomena in the Strong Spin-Orbit Regime, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 57 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    A. S. Mi˜ narro and G. Herranz, Emergent Orbital Dy- namics in Strongly Spin-Orbit Coupled Systems (2025), arXiv:2505.16746 [cond-mat]. 15

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Kusunose, Description of Multipole in f-Electron Sys- tems, J

    H. Kusunose, Description of Multipole in f-Electron Sys- tems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77, 064710 (2008)

    2008

  37. [45]

    Yu. F. Popov, A. M. Kadomtseva, G. P. Vorob’ev, V. A. Timofeeva, D. M. Ustinin, A. K. Zvezdin, and M. M. Tegeranchi, Magnetoelectric effect and toroidal ordering in Ga2−xFexO3, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 87, 146 (1998)

    1998

  38. [46]

    Voleti, D

    S. Voleti, D. D. Maharaj, B. D. Gaulin, G. Luke, and A. Paramekanti, Multipolar magnetism in d-orbital sys- tems: Crystal field levels, octupolar order, and orbital loop currents, Phys. Rev. B 101, 155118 (2020)

    2020

  39. [47]

    Pradhan, A

    K. Pradhan, A. Paramekanti, and T. Saha-Dasgupta, Multipolar magnetism in 5 d2 vacancy-ordered halide double perovskites, Phys. Rev. B 109, 184416 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    G. Chen, R. Pereira, and L. Balents, Exotic phases in- duced by strong spin-orbit coupling in ordered double perovskites, Physical Review B 82, 174440 (2010)

    2010

  41. [49]

    Chen and L

    G. Chen and L. Balents, Spin-orbit coupling ind2 ordered double perovskites, Phys. Rev. B 84, 094420 (2011)

    2011

  42. [50]

    M. G. Yamada, M. Oshikawa, and G. Jackeli, Emergent SU(4) symmetry in α-ZrCl3 and crystalline spin-orbital liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 097201 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Cao and L

    G. Cao and L. DeLong, Frontiers of 4D- and 5D- transition Metal Oxides(World Scientific, 2013)

    2013

  44. [52]

    L. V. Pourovskii and S. Khmelevskyi, Hidden order and multipolar exchange striction in a correlated f-electron system, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2025317118 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Santini, S

    P. Santini, S. Carretta, G. Amoretti, R. Caciuffo, N. Magnani, and G. H. Lander, Multipolar interactions in f -electron systems: The paradigm of actinide dioxides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 807 (2009)

    2009

  46. [54]

    Y. F. Popov, A. M. Kadomtseva, D. V. Belov, G. P. Vorob’ev, and A. K. Zvezdin, Magnetic-field-induced toroidal moment in the magnetoelectric Cr2O3, Jetp Lett. 69, 330 (1999)

    1999

  47. [55]

    Hayami and H

    S. Hayami and H. Kusunose, Microscopic Description of Electric and Magnetic Toroidal Multipoles in Hybrid Or- bitals, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 033709 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Kuramoto, H

    Y. Kuramoto, H. Kusunose, and A. Kiss, Multipole Or- ders and Fluctuations in Strongly Correlated Electron Systems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 78, 072001 (2009)

    2009

  49. [57]

    Hayami, M

    S. Hayami, M. Yatsushiro, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Classification of atomic-scale multipoles under crystallo- graphic point groups and application to linear response tensors, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165110 (2018)

    2018

  50. [58]

    Kim, J.-K

    H. Kim, J.-K. Kim, J. Kwon, J. Kim, H.-W. J. Kim, S. Ha, K. Kim, W. Lee, J. Kim, G. Y. Cho, H. Heo, J. Jang, C. J. Sahle, A. Longo, J. Strempfer, G. Fabbris, Y. Choi, D. Haskel, J. Kim, J.-W. Kim, and B. J. Kim, Quantum spin nematic phase in a square-lattice iridate, Nature 62...

    2024

  51. [59]

    Hirai, H

    D. Hirai, H. Sagayama, S. Gao, H. Ohsumi, G. Chen, T.- h. Arima, and Z. Hiroi, Detection of multipolar orders in the spin-orbit-coupled 5d Mott insulator Ba2MgReO6, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022063 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Y. Zhou, H. Ye, J. Zhang, and S. Dong, Double-leaf Riemann surface topological converse magnetoelectricity, Phys. Rev. B 110, 054424 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    G. Liu, M. Pi, L. Zhou, Z. Liu, X. Shen, X. Ye, S. Qin, X. Mi, X. Chen, L. Zhao, B. Zhou, J. Guo, X. Yu, Y. Chai, H. Weng, and Y. Long, Physical realization of topological Roman surface by spin-induced ferroelec- tric polarization in cubic lattice, Nat Commun 13, 2373 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.