pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.19374 · v3 · submitted 2024-12-26 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

A Review of Hydrogen-Enabled Resilience Enhancement for Multi-Energy Systems

Liang Yu , Haoyu Fang , Goran Strbac , Dawei Qiu , Dong Yue , Xiaohong Guan , Gerhard P. Hancke This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 06:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords hydrogenmulti-energy systemsresilience enhancementextreme eventsplanningoperationreview
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hydrogen integration supplies cross-temporal and cross-sector flexibility that can strengthen multi-energy system resilience to extreme events.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper fills a noted absence of systematic reviews by organizing work on hydrogen's contribution to multi-energy system resilience. It first lists advantages such as long-duration energy storage and black-start capability, then notes vulnerabilities and challenges. A framework is introduced that groups resilience metrics, event models, planning approaches by facility type, and operational steps into prevention, emergency response, and restoration phases. The review closes by naming open problems in metric design, scenario generation, compound-event modeling, and coordinated multi-network planning.

Core claim

The authors establish a resilience enhancement framework for hydrogen-enabled multi-energy systems and use it to classify planning measures according to hydrogen-related facility types together with uncertainty and scenario methods, while grouping operational measures into prevention, emergency response, and restoration stages and listing specific research gaps.

What carries the argument

The proposed resilience enhancement framework that structures the classification of metrics, contingency models, planning measures, and operational responses across three stages.

Load-bearing premise

The papers chosen for review and the classification framework together cover the main existing methods without large omissions or bias.

What would settle it

Publication of a review that includes a substantial set of omitted studies or that demonstrates a clearly more complete classification of the same methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19374 by Dawei Qiu, Dong Yue, Gerhard P. Hancke, Goran Strbac, Haoyu Fang, Liang Yu, Xiaohong Guan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Distinguishing features of hydrogen in MES resilien [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The framework of hydrogen-enabled resilience enhan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Typical HMES architecture (building-level) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Typical HMES architecture (region-level) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: System performance curves related to MES and HMES ope [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The classification of event-oriented contingency mo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The framework of two-stage resilience planning meth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The framework of the tri-level robust planning metho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Illustration of line outages in an electricity-hydr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The framework of the two-stage planning method [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The key idea of the proposed scheduling method for th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The illustration of an energy hub under threats of fa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The framework of the rolling dispatch method with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The framework of resilient scheduling for electric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ensuring resilience in multi-energy systems (MESs) has become increasingly urgent and challenging due to the growing frequency and severity of extreme events, such as natural disasters, extreme weather, and cyber-physical attacks. Among the various approaches to enhancing MES resilience, hydrogen integration offers significant potential in cross-temporal, cross-spatial, and cross-sector flexibility, as well as black-start capability. Although considerable efforts have been devoted to this area, a systematic review of resilience enhancement in hydrogen-enabled MESs is still lacking. To address this gap, this paper presents a comprehensive review of hydrogen-enabled MES resilience enhancement. First, advantages, vulnerabilities, and challenges related to hydrogen-enabled MES resilience enhancement are summarized. Next, a resilience enhancement framework for hydrogen-enabled MESs is proposed, based on which existing resilience metrics and event-oriented contingency models are reviewed and discussed. Planning measures are then classified according to the types of hydrogen-related facilities, together with uncertainty handling methods, scenario generation methods, and planning problem formulation frameworks. In addition, operational enhancement measures are categorized into three response stages: prevention, emergency response, and restoration. Finally, research gaps are identified and future directions are discussed, including comprehensive resilience metric design, advanced extreme-event scenario generation, spatiotemporal cyber-physical contingency modeling under compound extreme events, coordinated planning and operation across multiple networks and timescales, low-carbon resilient planning and operation, and large language model-assisted whole-process resilience enhancement.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to fill a gap by providing a comprehensive review of hydrogen-enabled resilience enhancement for multi-energy systems (MESs). It summarizes advantages/vulnerabilities/challenges of hydrogen integration, proposes a resilience enhancement framework (including metrics and event-oriented contingency models), classifies planning measures by hydrogen facility types together with uncertainty/scenario methods and problem formulations, categorizes operational measures into prevention/emergency/restoration stages, and identifies future directions such as comprehensive metrics, advanced scenario generation, cyber-physical modeling, coordinated planning, low-carbon resilience, and LLM-assisted methods.

Significance. A well-structured review that consolidates the role of hydrogen for cross-sector flexibility and black-start capability in MES resilience under extreme events could provide a useful reference, especially if the taxonomy organizes the literature without material omissions and the framework enables clearer identification of gaps.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and opening sections] The central claim of a 'comprehensive' and 'systematic' review that fills a gap is load-bearing, yet no literature search protocol is described (databases, keywords, time bounds, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or PRISMA-style flow). This directly affects evaluability of coverage and selection bias risk.
  2. [Framework proposal section] The proposed resilience enhancement framework is presented as the basis for reviewing metrics and contingency models, but the manuscript provides no explicit comparison to prior MES resilience frameworks or justification for its structure, leaving unclear whether it is additive or primarily reorganizational.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Future directions section] Update references to include any post-2023 works on compound cyber-physical contingencies or LLM-assisted resilience methods, as the field is fast-moving.
  2. [Planning and operational measures sections] Ensure consistent terminology for 'hydrogen-related facilities' across the planning classification and operational stages to avoid reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and opening sections] The central claim of a 'comprehensive' and 'systematic' review that fills a gap is load-bearing, yet no literature search protocol is described (databases, keywords, time bounds, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or PRISMA-style flow). This directly affects evaluability of coverage and selection bias risk.

    Authors: We agree that a detailed literature search protocol was omitted and that its absence limits transparency. In the revision we will insert a new 'Review Methodology' subsection (placed after the introduction) that specifies the databases queried (IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect), the Boolean keyword strings employed, the temporal window, explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria, and a PRISMA-style flow diagram showing the number of records screened and retained. This addition directly mitigates the evaluability and bias concerns raised. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Framework proposal section] The proposed resilience enhancement framework is presented as the basis for reviewing metrics and contingency models, but the manuscript provides no explicit comparison to prior MES resilience frameworks or justification for its structure, leaving unclear whether it is additive or primarily reorganizational.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit side-by-side comparison with prior MES resilience frameworks is missing. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (and accompanying table) within the framework section that (i) cites representative prior frameworks, (ii) maps their coverage against the hydrogen-specific elements we emphasize (cross-sector flexibility, black-start capability, and multi-timescale uncertainty), and (iii) justifies the proposed structure as additive rather than merely reorganizational. The comparison will be limited to the most directly relevant works to keep the review focused. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: review synthesis with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper is a literature review that summarizes existing work, proposes a classification framework, and identifies gaps. It contains no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations that could reduce to inputs by construction. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing for any central claim. The comprehensiveness assertion rests on the authors' literature search rather than any internal logical loop. This is the expected outcome for a non-mathematical synthesis paper; the derivation chain is empty and self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, the central contribution rests on the completeness of the literature survey and the utility of the proposed classification framework rather than any new parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5801 in / 992 out tokens · 22913 ms · 2026-05-23T06:59:15.208239+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 150 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A blockchain consensus mechanism for real-time regulation of renewable energy power systems ,

    Y . Y u, G. Liu, Y . Huang, et al. , “A blockchain consensus mechanism for real-time regulation of renewable energy power systems ,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Multicarrier Energy Systems: Shaping Our Energy Future,

    M.J. O’Malley et al., “Multicarrier Energy Systems: Shaping Our Energy Future,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 108, no. 9, pp. 1437-1456, Sept. 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Perera, V

    A. Perera, V . Nik, D. Chen, J. Scartezzini, and T. Hong, “Q uantifying the impacts of climate change and extreme climate events on ener gy systems, Nature Energy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 150-159, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Towards climate resilient ur ban energy systems: a review,

    V . Nik, A. Perera, D. Chen, “Towards climate resilient ur ban energy systems: a review,” National Science Review , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1-18, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Methods for analysis and quantification of power system resilience,

    A.M. Stankovi ´c, “Methods for analysis and quantification of power system resilience,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 4774-4787, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Spatiotemporal distribution of power outages with climate events and social vulnerability in the USA,

    V . Do, H. McBrien, N. Flores, et al. , “Spatiotemporal distribution of power outages with climate events and social vulnerability in the USA,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, pp. 2470-2482, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Resilience of renewable power sy stems under climate risks,

    L. Xu, K. Feng, N. Lin, A. Perera, H. Vincent Poor, L. Xie, C . Ji, X. Sun, Q. Guo, and M. Malley, “Resilience of renewable power sy stems under climate risks,” Nature Reviews in Electrical Engineering , vol. 1, pp. 53-66, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Energy system resilience-A re view,

    J. Jasi ¯unas, P . Lund, and J. Mikkola, “Energy system resilience-A re view,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , vol. 150, no. 111476, pp. 1-18, 2021

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Sustainable resilience of hydr ogen energy system,

    N. Afgan, A. V eziroglu, “Sustainable resilience of hydr ogen energy system,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , vol. 37, pp. 5461- 5467, 2012

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Resilience as sessment methodologies and enhancement strategies of multi-energy cyber-physical systems of the distribution network,

    B. Y ang, S. Ge, H. Liu, J. Li, and S. Zhang, “Resilience as sessment methodologies and enhancement strategies of multi-energy cyber-physical systems of the distribution network,” IET Energy Systems Integration, vol. 4, pp. 171-191, 2022

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Two-stag e robust resilience enhancement of distribution system against lin e failures via hydrogen tube trailers,

    L. Y ang, Z. Li, T. Liu, N. An, W. Zhou, and Y . Si, “Two-stag e robust resilience enhancement of distribution system against lin e failures via hydrogen tube trailers,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 20, pp. 5028-5041, 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Thermodynamic, sensitivity analyses and optimization of a dual-stage diaphragm compressor syst em: A model- based and experimental study,

    C. Sun, Z. He, X. Chen, et al. , “Thermodynamic, sensitivity analyses and optimization of a dual-stage diaphragm compressor syst em: A model- based and experimental study,” Energy, vol. 330, no. 136848, pp. 1-20, 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Modeling of the multi-period two- stage green hydrogen supply chain with consideration of sup ply and demand uncertainties,

    Y . Ma, M. Huang, Y . Zhou, et al. , “Modeling of the multi-period two- stage green hydrogen supply chain with consideration of sup ply and demand uncertainties,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , vol. 129, pp. 297-314, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Decentralized distributionally robust chance-constrained operation of integrated electricity a nd hydrogen trans- portation networks,

    W. Jia, T. Ding, Y . Y uan, et al. , “Decentralized distributionally robust chance-constrained operation of integrated electricity a nd hydrogen trans- portation networks,” Applied Energy , vol. 377, no. 124369, pp. 1-16, 2025

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Hydrogen re fueling station compression and storage optimization with tube-trailer de liveries,

    K. Reddi, A. Elgowainy, and E. Sutherland, “Hydrogen re fueling station compression and storage optimization with tube-trailer de liveries,” Inter- national Journal of Hydrogen Energy , vol. 39, no. 33, pp. 19169-19181, 2014

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    A data-driven probabilistic evaluation method of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles hosting capacity for i ntegrated hydrogen-electricity network,

    W. Xia, Z. Ren, H. Li, et al. , “A data-driven probabilistic evaluation method of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles hosting capacity for i ntegrated hydrogen-electricity network,” Applied Energy, vol. 376, no. 123895, pp. 1-16, 2024

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Optimal economic dispatch of hydrogen- electricity coupled multi-microgrid considering hydroge n tube trailers’ transportation,

    C. Lv, X. Jiang, X. Y an, et al., “Optimal economic dispatch of hydrogen- electricity coupled multi-microgrid considering hydroge n tube trailers’ transportation,” Proc. of China International Conference on Electricity Distribution (CICED), 2024, pp. 111-116, IEEE. 25

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Improve multi-energy supply micr ogrid resilience using mobile hydrogen trucks based on transportation netwo rk,

    B. Li, J. Li, B. Jian, “Improve multi-energy supply micr ogrid resilience using mobile hydrogen trucks based on transportation netwo rk,” eTrans- portation, vol. 18, no. 100265, pp. 1-18, 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Resilience assessment and enhancement for distribution network by hydrogen trans portation,

    H. Qian, D. Tang, S. Sun, K. Y ang and H. Wang, “Resilience assessment and enhancement for distribution network by hydrogen trans portation,” 2024 7th International Conference on Power and Energy Appli cations (ICPEA), Taiyuan, China, 2024, pp. 559-564

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Hydrogen leakage and diffusion in the operational cabin of hydrogen tube bundle containers: A CFD study,

    J. Song, K. Qi, X. Liu, et al. , “Hydrogen leakage and diffusion in the operational cabin of hydrogen tube bundle containers: A CFD study,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , vol. 88, pp. 986C1002, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    An ADMM- enabled robust optimization framework for self-healing schedulin g of smart grids integrated with smart prosumers,

    P . Zhang, S. A. Mansouri, A. R. Jordehi, et al., “An ADMM- enabled robust optimization framework for self-healing schedulin g of smart grids integrated with smart prosumers,” Applied Energy , vol. 363, p. 123067, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Co-planning of hydrogen-based microgrids and fuel-cell bus operation cen ters under low-carbon and resilience considerations,

    Y . Dong, W. Zheng, X. Cao, X. Sun, and Z. He, “Co-planning of hydrogen-based microgrids and fuel-cell bus operation cen ters under low-carbon and resilience considerations,” Applied Energy, vol. 336, no. 120849, pp. 1-15, 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Resilience enhanc ement method against persistent extreme weather with low tempera tures in self- sustained highway transportation energy system,

    F. Chen, M. Xia, Q. Chen, and L. Y ang, “Resilience enhanc ement method against persistent extreme weather with low tempera tures in self- sustained highway transportation energy system,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications , vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 996-1009, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Towards re newable- dominated energy systems: Role of green hydrogen,

    S. Chen, J. Zhang, Z. Wei, H. Cheng, and S. Lv, “Towards re newable- dominated energy systems: Role of green hydrogen,” Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy , vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1697-1709, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Online operation optimization for hydrogen-based building energ y systems under uncertainties,

    L. Y u, D. Y ue, Z. Chen, S. Zhang, Z. Xu and X. Guan, “Online operation optimization for hydrogen-based building energ y systems under uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 4589- 4601, 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Hydrogen energy systems: A critical review of technologies, applications, trends an d challenges,

    M. Y ue, H. Lambert, E. Pahon, et al. “Hydrogen energy systems: A critical review of technologies, applications, trends an d challenges,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , vol. 146, no. 111180, pp. 1-21, 2021

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Power-to-hydrogen and hydrogen-to-X energy systems for the industry of the future in Europe,

    M. Genovese, A. Schl ¨uter, E. Scionti, F. Piraino, O. Corigliano, and P . Fragiacomo, “Power-to-hydrogen and hydrogen-to-X energy systems for the industry of the future in Europe,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 48, no. 44, pp. 16545-16568, 2023

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Resilience assessment of hydrogen-integrated energy system for airport electrification,

    H. Zhao et al. , “Resilience assessment of hydrogen-integrated energy system for airport electrification,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Appli- cations, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 2812-2824, 2022

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Stochastic two-stag e resilient scheduling of hydrogen system in power distribution grids w ith high pen- etration of solar PV systems: A convex worst case analysis,

    X. Liu, Z. Hua, X. Y uan, and J. Liu, “Stochastic two-stag e resilient scheduling of hydrogen system in power distribution grids w ith high pen- etration of solar PV systems: A convex worst case analysis,” Sustainable Cities and Society , vol. 112, no. 105581, pp. 1-22, 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    A robust microgrid fo rmation strategy for resilience enhancement of hydrogen penetrate d active distri- bution networks,

    Y . Zhao, J. Lin, Y . Song, and Y . Xu, “A robust microgrid fo rmation strategy for resilience enhancement of hydrogen penetrate d active distri- bution networks,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 2735-2748, 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Resilience-orie nted operation of integrated electricity-natural gas systems u sing hydrogen enriched compressed natural gas,

    R. Zhu, H. Liu, W. Y u, W. Gu, and L. Sun, “Resilience-orie nted operation of integrated electricity-natural gas systems u sing hydrogen enriched compressed natural gas,” IEEE Systems Journal , vol. 18, no. 2, pp.953-964, 2023

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Ince ntivizing frequency provision of power-to-hydrogen toward grid resiliency enhance- ment,

    Z. Wu, J. Wang, M. Zhou, Q. Xia, C.-W. Tan, and G. Li, “Ince ntivizing frequency provision of power-to-hydrogen toward grid resiliency enhance- ment,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 9370-9381, 2022

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Hydrogen-powered smart grid re- silience,

    J. Han, J. Wang, Z. He, et al. , “Hydrogen-powered smart grid re- silience,” Energy Conversion and Economics , vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 89-104, 2023

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Battling the extreme: A s tudy on the power system resilience,

    Z. Bie, Y . Lin, G. Li, and F. Li, “Battling the extreme: A s tudy on the power system resilience,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 105, no. 7, pp. 1253-1266, 2017

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Networked microgrids for enhancing the power syste m resilience,

    Z. Li, M. Shahidehpour, F. Aminifar, A. Alabdulwahab, a nd Y . Al- Turki, “Networked microgrids for enhancing the power syste m resilience,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 105, no. 7, pp. 1289-1310, 2017

    work page 2017

  36. [36]

    A review of the measures to enhance power systems resilience,

    M. Mahzarnia, M. P . Moghaddam, P . T. Baboli, and P . Siano , “A review of the measures to enhance power systems resilience,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 4059-4070, 2020

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliabi lity during natural disasters,

    E. Hossain, S. Roy, N. Mohammad, N. Nawar, and D. R. Dipta , “Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliabi lity during natural disasters,” Applied Energy, vol. 290, no. 116709, pp. 1-24, 2021

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    On the resilie nce of modern power systems: A comprehensive review from the cyber -physical perspective,

    L. Xu, Q. Guo, Y . Sheng, S. Muyeen, H. Sun, “On the resilie nce of modern power systems: A comprehensive review from the cyber -physical perspective,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , vol. 151, no. 111642, pp. 1-23, 2021

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    On the resilience of modern pow er systems: A complex network perspective,

    X. Ma, H. Zhou, and Z. Li, “On the resilience of modern pow er systems: A complex network perspective,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 152, no. 111646, pp. 1-17, 2021

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Enhancing dist ribution sys- tem resilience against extreme weather events: Concept rev iew, algorithm summary, and future vision,

    Q. Shi, W. Liu, B. Zeng, H. Hui, and F. Li, “Enhancing dist ribution sys- tem resilience against extreme weather events: Concept rev iew, algorithm summary, and future vision,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems , vol. 138, no. 107860, pp. 1-23, 2022

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Trends in modern power systems resilience: Stat e-of-the- art review,

    A. Y ounesi, H. Shayeghi, Z. Wang, P . Siano, A. Mehrizi-S ani, and A. Safari, “Trends in modern power systems resilience: Stat e-of-the- art review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , vol. 162, no. 112397, pp. 1-15, 2022

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Electrical energy systems resilience: A comprehensive review on defini tions, chal- lenges, enhancements and future proceedings,

    F. Amini, S. Ghassemzadeh, N. Rostami, and V . S. Tabar, “ Electrical energy systems resilience: A comprehensive review on defini tions, chal- lenges, enhancements and future proceedings,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 17, pp. 1835-1858, 2023

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    A review of power system resilience assessment and enhancement appr oaches by focusing on wind farms and wind turbines,

    S. A. Modaberi, S. Tohidi, S. G. Zadeh, and T. G. Bolandi, “A review of power system resilience assessment and enhancement appr oaches by focusing on wind farms and wind turbines,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 17, pp. 2391-2410, 2023

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Toward resilient modern power systems: from single- domain to cross-domain resilience enhancement,

    H. Huang et al. , “Toward resilient modern power systems: from single- domain to cross-domain resilience enhancement,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 365-398, 2024

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Power systems and microgrids resilience enhancement strategies: A review,

    T. E. K. Zidane et al. , “Power systems and microgrids resilience enhancement strategies: A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 207, no. 114953, pp. 1-27, 2025

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Robust resiliency-oriented planning of electricity- hydrogen island energy systems under contingency uncertai nty,

    Y . Gu, et al. , “Robust resiliency-oriented planning of electricity- hydrogen island energy systems under contingency uncertai nty,” Journal of Cleaner Production , no. 143678, pp. 1-13, 2024

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Data- driven stochastic-robust planning for resilient hydrogen -electricity system with progressive hedging decoupling,

    Z. Wen, X. Zhang, G. Wang, Y . Li, J. Qiu, and F. Wen, “Data- driven stochastic-robust planning for resilient hydrogen -electricity system with progressive hedging decoupling,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2024.3519614, 2024

    work page doi:10.1109/tste.2024.3519614 2024

  48. [48]

    Hydrogen energy f uture: Advancements in storage technologies and implications for sustainability,

    Q. Hassan and A. Sameen and H. Salman, “Hydrogen energy f uture: Advancements in storage technologies and implications for sustainability,” Journal of Energy Storage , vol. 72, no. 108404, pp. 1-16, 2023

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    A review of seasonal hydrogen storage multi-energy systems based on temporal and spatial charact eristics,

    Y . Cao, Y . Y ang, X. Zhao, et al. “A review of seasonal hydrogen storage multi-energy systems based on temporal and spatial charact eristics,” Journal of Renewable Materials , vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1823-1842, 2021

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Proactive r olling-horizon- based scheduling of hydrogen systems for resilient power gr ids,

    H. Haggi, W. Sun, J. Fenton, and P . Brooker, “Proactive r olling-horizon- based scheduling of hydrogen systems for resilient power gr ids,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications , vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 1737-1746, 2022

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Resilience-oriented energy operation of a country house sustained by fishing with renewable sources and hydrogen-ba sed tech- nologies,

    A. C ¸ ic ¸ek, “Resilience-oriented energy operation of a country house sustained by fishing with renewable sources and hydrogen-ba sed tech- nologies,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , vol. 144, pp. 947- 963, 2025

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    https://www.ci.calistoga.ca.us/city-hall/depart ments-services/public- works/calistoga-resiliency-center

    work page

  53. [53]

    Understanding carbon resilience under public health emergencies: a synthetic difference-i n-differences approach,

    C. Wu, X. Li, R. Jiang, et al. , “Understanding carbon resilience under public health emergencies: a synthetic difference-i n-differences approach,” Scientific Reports , vol. 14, no. 1, p. 20581, 2024

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Multi-objective optimal scheduling of islands considering offshore hydrogen production,

    Y . Wang, R. Tian, S. Zheng, et al. , “Multi-objective optimal scheduling of islands considering offshore hydrogen production,” Scientific Reports , vol. 15, no. 1, p. 27371, 2025

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Dynamic energy flow optimi zation of electricity and hydrogen-enriched natural gas integrated energy systems,

    T. Y ang, Y . Geng, and H. Wang, “Dynamic energy flow optimi zation of electricity and hydrogen-enriched natural gas integrated energy systems,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 109, pp. 1274-1285, 2025

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Hydrogen production by waste heat recovery of hydrogen-enriched compressed natur al gas via steam methane reforming process,

    S. M. I. Shahid, M. Farhan, A. Rao, et al. , “Hydrogen production by waste heat recovery of hydrogen-enriched compressed natur al gas via steam methane reforming process,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 117, pp. 374-392, 2025

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    J. Lu, L. Fang, F. Jiang, and X. Li, “A black start strateg y for hydrogen-integrated renewable grids with energy stora ge systems, https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.14450, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Fueling the future: A comprehensive review of hydrogen energy systems and their challenges,

    T. Le, P . Sharma, B. Bora, et al. “Fueling the future: A comprehensive review of hydrogen energy systems and their challenges,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , vol. 54, pp. 791-816, 2024

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Strengthening energy hub resilience: KNN-based cyber protection with demand-side d ata modifi- cation for hydrogen, electrical, and thermal storage,

    D. Rizi, M. Nazari, and S. Hosseinian, et al. “Strengthening energy hub resilience: KNN-based cyber protection with demand-side d ata modifi- cation for hydrogen, electrical, and thermal storage,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 132, no. 117625, 2025

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    D. Hua, H. Huang, P . Y an, et al., “A multi-stage NSGA-III optimization model for false data injection attacks in integrated power- hydrogen cyber- physical systems, IET Renewable Power Generation , vol. 19, no. 1, e70022, 2025

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Multi-stage a daptive stochastic-robust scheduling method with affine decision p olicies for 26 hydrogen-based multi-energy microgrid,

    Y . Zhou, Q. Zhai, Z. Xu, L. Wu, and X. Guan, “Multi-stage a daptive stochastic-robust scheduling method with affine decision p olicies for 26 hydrogen-based multi-energy microgrid,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 2738-2750, May 2024

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Reliability and comfort-aware operation optimization for hydrogen-based building energy systems in off-grid mod e,

    Z. Chen et al. , “Reliability and comfort-aware operation optimization for hydrogen-based building energy systems in off-grid mod e,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2884-2899, 2025

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Joint opt imization and learning approach for smart operation of hydrogen-base d building energy systems,

    L. Y u, Z. Xu, X. Guan, Q. Zhao, C. Dou and D. Y ue, “Joint opt imization and learning approach for smart operation of hydrogen-base d building energy systems,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid , vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 199-216, 2023

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    A case application of WRF-UCM models to the simulation of urban wind speed profiles in a typh oon,

    Y . Zhang, S. Cao, L. Zhao, et al. , “A case application of WRF-UCM models to the simulation of urban wind speed profiles in a typh oon,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics , vol. 220, pp. 104874, 2022

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    MES (multi-energy systems): An overvi ew of concepts and evaluation models,

    P . Mancarella, “MES (multi-energy systems): An overvi ew of concepts and evaluation models,” Energy, vol. 65, pp. 1-17, 2014

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    Real-worl d scale deployment of hydrogen-integrated microgrid: design and c ontrol,

    X. Wang, J. Huang, Z. Xu, C. Zhang and X. Guan, “Real-worl d scale deployment of hydrogen-integrated microgrid: design and c ontrol,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy , vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2380-2392, 2024

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    Multi-time-space scale optimization for a hydrogen-based regional multi-energy system

    G. Fan, B. Y u, B. Sun, et al., “Multi-time-space scale optimization for a hydrogen-based regional multi-energy system” Applied Energy, vol. 371, no. 123430, pp. 1-24, 2024

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Extracting re silience metrics from distribution utility data using outage and restore pro cess statistics,

    N. K. Carrington, I. Dobson, and Z. Wang, “Extracting re silience metrics from distribution utility data using outage and restore pro cess statistics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 5814-5823, Nov. 2021

    work page 2021

  69. [69]

    How Long is a Resilience Even t in a Transmission System?: Metrics and Models Driven by Utility Data,

    I. Dobson and S. Ekisheva, “How Long is a Resilience Even t in a Transmission System?: Metrics and Models Driven by Utility Data,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 2814-2826, Mar. 2024

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Quantifying distribution syst em resilience from utility data: large event risk and benefits of investmen ts,

    A. Ahmad and I. Dobson, “Quantifying distribution syst em resilience from utility data: large event risk and benefits of investmen ts,” IET Conference Proceedings, vol. 2024, no. 27, pp. 118-122, Jan. 2025

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Resili ence-assuring hydrogen-powered microgrids,

    C. Lin, P . Zhang, Y . A. Shamash, Z. Lin, and X. Lu, “Resili ence-assuring hydrogen-powered microgrids,” iEnergy, vol. 3, pp. 77-81, 2024

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Resilience of hydrogen fuel station-integrated power systems with high penetrati on of photo- voltaics,

    W. Cai, S. A. Mansouri, A. R. Jordehi, et al. , “Resilience of hydrogen fuel station-integrated power systems with high penetrati on of photo- voltaics,” Journal of Energy Storage , vol. 73, no. 108909, pp. 1-13, 2023

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Industrial energy hubs with electric, thermal a nd hydrogen demands for resilience enhancement of mobile storage-inte grated power systems,

    A. Jordehi, S. Mansouri, M. Tostado-V ´eliz, A. Iqbal, M. Marzband, and F. Jurado, “Industrial energy hubs with electric, thermal a nd hydrogen demands for resilience enhancement of mobile storage-inte grated power systems,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , vol. 50, pp. 77-91, 2024

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    Chance co nstrained robust hydrogen storage management to service restoration in microgrids considering the methanation process model,

    N. Afsari, S. SeyedShenava, and H. Shayeghi, “Chance co nstrained robust hydrogen storage management to service restoration in microgrids considering the methanation process model,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 50, pp. 1463-1476, 2024

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    Resilience enhancement strategies for power distributi on network based on hydrogen storage and hydrogen vehicle,

    P . Xie et al. , “Resilience enhancement strategies for power distributi on network based on hydrogen storage and hydrogen vehicle,” IET Energy Systems Integration, vol. 2024, pp. 1-10, 2024

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    A hierarchical strat egy for restorative self-healing of hydrogen-penetrated distrib ution systems con- sidering energy sharing via mobile resources,

    Y . Zhao, J. Lin, Y . Song, and Y . Xu, “A hierarchical strat egy for restorative self-healing of hydrogen-penetrated distrib ution systems con- sidering energy sharing via mobile resources,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1388-1404, 2023

    work page 2023

  77. [77]

    Resil ience constrained scheduling of mobile emergency resources in el ectricity- hydrogen distribution network,

    X. Cao, T. Cao, Z. Xu, B. Zeng, G. Feng, and X. Guan, “Resil ience constrained scheduling of mobile emergency resources in el ectricity- hydrogen distribution network,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable En- ergy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1269-1284, 2023

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    Photovoltaic-penetrated power dist ribution net- works resiliency-oriented day-ahead scheduling equipped with power-to- hydrogen systems: A risk-driven decision framework,

    Z. Y uan and J. Li, “Photovoltaic-penetrated power dist ribution net- works resiliency-oriented day-ahead scheduling equipped with power-to- hydrogen systems: A risk-driven decision framework,” Energy, vol. 299, no. 131115, pp. 1-17, 2024

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    Resilience-motivated service restoration of interdependent power and hydrogen distribu tion system,

    S. Zhu, Y . Xu, Y . Wang, and J. He, “Resilience-motivated service restoration of interdependent power and hydrogen distribu tion system,” IEEE Access , vol. 12, no. 149528, pp. 1-15, 2024

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    Renewable-dominated mobility-as-a-service fra mework for resilience delivery in hydrogen-accommodated microgrids ,

    J. Su, R. Zhang, P . Dehghanian, M. H. Kapourchali, S. Cho i, and Z. Ding, “Renewable-dominated mobility-as-a-service fra mework for resilience delivery in hydrogen-accommodated microgrids ,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems , vol. 159, no. 110047, pp. 1-12, 2024

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.