Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 16 references

The Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment Survey (HETDEX) Active Galactic Nuclei Catalog: the Fourth Data Release

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that an untargeted integral-field spectroscopic survey, HETDEX, has produced a catalog of 15,940 active galactic nuclei whose redshift-secure density is about three times that of SDSS quasars, revealing a large…

desk verdict Bigger HETDEX AGN catalog with transparent methods, but the faint-end completeness is unmeasured exactly where it claims to find new AGN. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19414 v1 pith:5U5PTT2A submitted 2024-12-27 astro-ph.GA

Chenxu Liu , Karl Gebhardt , Erin Mentuch Cooper , Dustin Davis , Donald P. Schneider , Matt J. Jarvis , Daniel J. Farrow , Steven L. Finkelstein
show 2 more authors
Oscar A. Chavez Ortiz The HETDEX Collaboration
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords activegalacticnucleiAGNcatalogintegralfieldspectroscopyuntargetedsurveyquasardensitycompletenessemission-lineregionsHETDEXHDR4
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Sitting inside the fourth HETDEX data release, this paper claims that an untargeted integral-field spectroscopic survey—one that picks no targets by color or image—finds 15,940 active galactic nuclei over 62.9 square degrees, with 10,499 secure redshifts. That gives a raw AGN density of 253.4 $deg^{-2}$ and a secure density of 166.9 $deg^{-2}$, about three times the 56 $deg^{-2}$ of SDSS quasars. The paper's point is that imaging-selected quasar surveys miss a large population of low-luminosity, narrow-line, and red AGN down to g~25 that only blank-sky spectroscopy can reveal. It also finds that 39% of the redshift-confirmed AGN have emission-line regions more extended than the point-spread function, plausibly outflows or ionized halo gas around the black hole.

What carries the argument

The identification machinery is a two-track emission-line search on the HETDEX line and continuum detections. The line-pair method finds AGN by requiring two characteristic lines (e.g., C IV 1549 plus a companion) at >8 sigma and >5 sigma; the single broad-line method fits multi-Gaussian profiles and flags lines broader than FWHM 1200 km/s at >5 sigma, assigning a redshift guess from the line's equivalent width. A cross-match with SDSS DR16Q confirms or corrects redshifts and recovers a few AGN whose lines fall outside the 3500-5500 Å window. To build the unique catalog, friends-of-friends grouping with linking length (5.0", 0.1 in redshift) merges the 63,827 detections into 15,940 AGN; the choice is justified by FoF experiments showing the count plateaus near 16,000 for δr >= 5". The pipeline's completeness and contamination curves are constructed by cross-matching all fibers with SDSS DR16Q.

What would settle it

Take the 5,441 AGN with estimated redshifts and obtain follow-up spectra for a random sample: if a large fraction show only narrow lines or star-forming signatures, then the raw density claim (253.4 $deg^{-2}$) is inflated, while the secure density (166.9 $deg^{-2}$) stands. Alternatively, compute the recovery fraction of HETDEX AGN against a deep X-ray-selected sample in the COSMOS or GOODS-N fields: if recovery drops below the SDSS-based curve at g>22.5, the completeness model fails in exactly the regime where the survey claims novelty.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the AGN population at these depths is substantially larger and fainter than imaging-selected catalogs suggest, and that an IFU survey can recover it without selection cuts. From 345,874 IFU observations the paper builds a catalog of 15,940 AGN at z=0.1-4.6; 10,499 have redshifts confirmed by line pairs or SDSS matches, and the secure subset alone has a surface density of 166.9 $deg^{-2}$ versus 56 $deg^{-2}$ for SDSS quasars. The remaining 5,441 are single broad-line candidates, of which 3,358 have intermediate widths (FWHM ~ 1200 km/s) and are explicitly flagged as possible non-AGN. Additionally, 4,060 of the 10,499 secure AGN show extended emission-line regions at >3 $\sigma$ beyond image quality, which the paper interprets as strong outflows or ionized circum/intergalactic gas.

Load-bearing premise

The headline density advantage assumes that the AGN recovery fractions measured against bright SDSS quasars transfer to the faint, narrow-line AGN this survey uniquely finds, and that the chosen friend-of-friend linking length of 5 arcseconds separates real AGN from extended emission rather than merging or splitting them.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the density comparison is correct, luminosity functions and black-hole accretion rates built from imaging-selected quasars are missing the majority of the AGN population at g < 25.
  • The 39% extended-emission fraction means typical, not just rare, AGN can be used to map outflows and gas halos with spatially resolved spectra.
  • Users can isolate a 'secure AGN' sample of 12,582 objects using the agn flag, removing the 3,358 intermediate-broad-line candidates that may be star-forming contaminants.
  • The catalog's reach to z=0.1-4.6 (via SDSS matches beyond the nominal 0.25-4.32 line window) makes it a resource for AGN demographics across cosmic time.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable consequence the paper leaves open: if the SDSS-anchored completeness curves do not transfer to faint narrow-line AGN, the true recoverable density could be higher than 253.4 deg^-2 (if HETDEX detects line-emitting AGN that SDSS colors reject) or lower (if faint AGN have weak lines); this can be checked by comparing to X-ray- or radio-selected AGN in the same fields.
  • The friend-of-friend choice directly sets the 15,940 count and the 39% extended fraction; re-deriving the extended-fraction statistic from per-object radial profiles rather than group membership would make it independent of that choice.
  • The second magnitude peak at g~24, dominated by intermediate-broad-line candidates, is a natural target for narrow-band follow-up: if those objects are mostly star-forming LAEs, the raw density should be quoted with the agn flag=0 removed.
  • Extending the same blind selection to the completed 540 deg^2 survey would test whether the spring/fall field densities (268 and 233 deg^-2) are cosmic variance or a real large-scale AGN enhancement.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents the AGN catalog from the fourth HETDEX data release (HDR4), an untargeted IFU spectroscopic survey covering 62.9 deg^2. The catalog contains 15,940 unique AGN, of which 10,499 have redshifts confirmed by line pairs or SDSS DR16Q matches; the remainder are single-line candidates, with 3,358 flagged as intermediate-broad-line AGN candidates. The raw AGN density is 253.4 deg^-2 (166.9 deg^-2 for the secure-redshift subset), which the authors compare to ~56 deg^-2 for SDSS quasars. The paper also reports that 39% of redshift-confirmed AGN have spatially extended emission-line regions. Completeness is estimated by cross-matching SDSS DR16Q quasars with HETDEX fibers (5,872 matches) and is stated to be limited at g > 22.5.

Significance. If the catalog is robust, it provides an important untargeted spectroscopic AGN sample that can probe lower-luminosity, narrow-line, and red AGN missed by imaging-selected quasar surveys, and the publicly released FITS products with detailed flags will be a valuable resource. The paper is generally transparent: flags for confirmed vs estimated redshifts and secure vs candidate AGN are provided, the duplicate-removal method is tested with friend-of-friend linking-length experiments, and the completeness is benchmarked against an external catalog. The main risk to significance is that the completeness calibration is sparsely sampled in the faint regime where the catalog's novelty lies, so the headline densities and faint-end statistics are not yet firmly established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5, Figure 4] The completeness and contamination curves are anchored to a cross-match with SDSS DR16Q, with 5,872 quasars covered by good HETDEX fibers; the paper itself notes 'the sample size is limited at g > 22.5.' The recovery fractions (93% pipeline, 80% AGN selection) are therefore measured on a brighter, bluer, mostly broad-line quasar population than the low-luminosity, narrow-line, red AGN the catalog is claimed to add. Because the LP thresholds (8sigma/5sigma) and the sBL FWHM > 1200 km/s criterion depend on line properties that may differ in the faint population, the completeness curves in Figure 4 cannot be extrapolated to g > 22.5, exactly the regime where the densities 253.4 deg^-2 and 166.9 deg^-2 and the 'down to g~25' claim are made. The authors should provide a completeness model as a function of line flux, equivalent width, and line width (as in Liu et al. 2022c) or cross-match to deeper surveys (e.g., COSMOS, CANDELS) to calibrate the faint end, or restrict the quantitative density claims to the calibrated bright regime.
  2. [Table 1; Section 5] The comparison 'HETDEX secure AGN density 166.9 deg^-2 ... significantly higher than that of the SDSS quasars (56 deg^-2)' is not a like-for-like comparison. The SDSS value is for color-selected, spectroscopically confirmed quasars over a different effective area and depth, and the HETDEX number is a raw detection density without completeness correction. Incompleteness at the faint end (which the paper acknowledges) and differing selection functions mean that this comparison does not by itself demonstrate a higher space density of AGN. The text should either present completeness-corrected density estimates or explicitly label the comparison as raw detection rates with caveats.
  3. [Section 4] The 39% extended-emission-line fraction (4,060/10,499) is a headline result but is based on a threshold criterion ('member detections >5sigma more extended than their relevant PSF models (FWHM_virus + 3 FWHM_virus_err)/2') whose false-positive rate from PSF errors, source blending, or multiple-fiber detections is not quantified. The interpretation as outflows or ionized IGM is speculative and needs support from 2D surface-brightness fitting (as for the example agnid=407) or a control sample of stars or compact sources. As written, the abstract presents this number without the required validation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1] The text states 'we release the 15,877 AGN identified from the fourth HETDEX Data Release (HDR4),' but Table 1 and the abstract give 15,940; this numerical inconsistency should be corrected.
  2. [Section 2] The word 'diamter' is a typo for 'diameter.'
  3. [Section 5] The text says 'all 500 million HETDEX HDR4 fibers' were cross-matched, but Section 2 implies 345,874 IFU observations with 34,944 fibers each; please clarify what 'fibers' means here.
  4. [Figure 5] The gray SDSS DR16Q histogram is described as 'scaled ... to generally match the number of HETDEX AGN at z~1.5'; the scaling factor should be stated for reproducibility.
  5. [Section 7, Column 18] The format string 'yyyymmddsss multi bbb ccc ddd aa fff' for fiberid is cryptic; an explicit example would aid users of the catalog.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the HDR4 AGN catalog is an observational product whose AGN identification and completeness estimates are anchored to external emission-line criteria and the SDSS DR16Q quasar catalog.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are the counts and densities of AGN found by applying the HETDEX pipeline and the LP/sBL selection methods. The identification is not defined in terms of the claimed catalog: AGN are selected by line-pair detections at >8σ and >5σ, by single broad lines with FWHM>1200 km/s at >5σ, and by cross-matching to SDSS DR16Q, an external catalog. The completeness and contamination estimates in Figure 4 are measured against 5,872 SDSS DR16Q quasars covered by good HETDEX fibers, so the recovery fractions (93% pipeline, 80% AGN selection) are anchored to an external benchmark rather than derived from the model. Self-citations to Liu22 and Liu et al. (2022c) supply the method details and prior completeness modeling from earlier HETDEX releases; they are methodology references, not a chain that defines the present catalog's target result in terms of itself. The paper explicitly flags the calibration gap at faint magnitudes ('the sample size is limited at g ≳ 22.5') and calls the g~24 peak 'suspicious'; these are acknowledged completeness limitations, not circular reductions. No equation or parameter in the paper is shown to be equivalent to the output by construction, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. Accordingly, no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is an observational catalog paper; the numbers that shape the result are selection and grouping thresholds chosen by hand or by data inspection rather than fitted model parameters. The assumptions are domain assumptions about line diagnostics and the external SDSS benchmark, not unproved mathematical axioms.

free parameters (5)
  • LP method SNR thresholds = 8σ (primary line), 5σ (secondary line)
    Section 3.3.1: thresholds chosen so that no known AGN are missed and the false positive rate stays near 50% in visual-inspection tests on small samples. Changing these thresholds changes the AGN candidate count.
  • sBL FWHM threshold = 1200 km/s at >5σ
    Section 3.3.2: defines a broad-line AGN candidate; the 5σ choice is a balance between completeness (89% to 91% at 4.5σ) and false positive rate (50% to 90%).
  • FoF linking length = δr=5.0 arcsec, δz=0.1
    Section 4: chosen after FoF experiments (Figure 2); the unique-AGN count decreases with δr and reaches a plateau near 16,000; at δr=4.5'' newly added sources are extended emission of existing AGN. The adopted value directly sets the 15,940 unique AGN count and the number density 253.4 deg^-2.
  • Extended-emission threshold = (FWHM_virus + 3 FWHM_virus_err)/2 with >5σ member detection
    Section 4: defines the 39% fraction of redshift-confirmed AGN with extended emission-line regions; a different threshold or linking length would change the 4,060 count.
  • Continuum/line separation threshold = 50 counts per 2Å pixel (g~22.5)
    Section 3.1.1: objects brighter than this are searched as continuum sources and skipped for further line-element search, affecting which AGN can be found by the line-pair method.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The six strong AGN lines (O VI, Lyα, N V, C IV, C III], Mg II) and their relative equivalent widths are the correct identification keys for AGN in the HETDEX wavelength range.
    Section 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 use this set for line-pair identification and single-line redshift guesses; if the true AGN population has different line ratios, selection is biased.
  • domain assumption Emission-line pairs with the primary at >8σ and secondary at >5σ and single lines with FWHM>1200 km/s at >5σ are AGN signatures; star-forming galaxies can be visually separated from these.
    Section 3.3: the thresholds and line-pair interpretation assume the chosen diagnostics separate AGN from LAEs and star-bursting galaxies; the paper notes sIBLs can be star-bursting galaxies.
  • domain assumption The image quality measured from bright-star PSFs (FWHM_virus ~1.8'') can be modeled as a single Gaussian for each line detection, and the threshold (FWHM_virus + 3 err)/2 reliably distinguishes extended emission.
    Sections 3.1 and 4: used to define the 39% extended AGN fraction; no validation against simulated extended sources is presented in this paper.
  • domain assumption SDSS DR16Q is a fair external benchmark for completeness and contamination of the HETDEX AGN selection.
    Section 5: completeness and contamination are computed by cross-matching to 5,872 SDSS quasars covered by good fibers; the sample is sparse at g ≳ 22.5, so the benchmark is weakest exactly in the faint regime the catalog aims to add.
  • domain assumption The line-detection completeness as a function of SNR from Liu22 (Figures 6 and 7) and the completeness model from Liu et al. 2022c transfer to HDR4 data.
    Sections 3 and 5 cite Liu22 for pipeline completeness; HDR4 has more IFUs (up to 78) and different observing conditions, but no new simulations are presented here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment Survey (HETDEX) Active Galactic Nuclei Catalog: the Fourth Data Release." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5U5PTT2A

@misc{pith2026241219414,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment Survey (HETDEX) Active Galactic Nuclei Catalog: the Fourth Data Release},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5U5PTT2A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19414}
}
abstract

We present the Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) catalog from the fourth data release (HDR4) of the Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment Survey (HETDEX). HETDEX is an untargeted spectroscopic survey. HDR4 contains 345,874 Integral Field Unit (IFU) observations from January 2017 to August 2023 covering an effective area of 62.9 deg2. With no imaging pre-selection, our spectroscopic confirmed AGN sample includes low-luminosity AGN, narrow-line AGN, and/or red AGN down to g~25. This catalog has 15,940 AGN across the redshifts of z=0.1~4.6, giving a raw AGN number density of 253.4 deg-2. Among them, 10,499 (66%) have redshifts either confirmed by line pairs or matched to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Catalog. For the remaining 5,441 AGN, 2,083 are single broad line AGN candidates, while the remaining 3,358 are single intermediate broad line (full width at half maximum, FWHM ~ 1200 km s-1) AGN candidates. A total of 4,060 (39%) of the 10,499 redshift-confirmed AGN have emission-line regions $3\sigma$ more extended than the image quality which could be strong outflows blowing into the outskirts of the host galaxies or ionized intergalactic medium.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19414 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An example of an AGN (agnid=407) detected with extended diffuse ionized gas. a) The HSC r-band 30′′×30′′ im￾age with the red Lyα λ1215 narrow-band 2σ density contour. b) The HETDEX Lyα λ1215 narrow-band image. c) The radial profile of the Lyα λ1215 flux density map. Blue data points are surface brightness variations. The red curve is an (PSF + exponential) fit to the blue points giving a rext = 47.6 kpc. The green d… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The FoF experiments with linking lengths of δr = 3.0′′, 3.5′′, 4.0′′, 4.5′′, 5.0′′, 5.5′′, 6.0′′ for the 63,827 AGN detections. The 2-D FoF tests are the red crosses. The 3-D FoF tests (δz = 0.1) are the blue data points. even has a > 5σ member detection 8.2′′ away from its FoF center. With the HETDEX resolving power (2 ˚A in the wavelength space, and 0.15′′ in the fiber space, Sec￾tion 3.1), agnid=407 shows no evid… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Distributions of the separations between the “best” detections (detectid best) to their emission-line flux weighted FoF centers. Right: Distributions of the separations between all AGN detections to their emission-line flux weighted FoF centers. Field Name Field center Area NAGN nAGN NAGN,secure z nAGN,secure z J2000, deg deg2 deg−2 deg−2 DEX-spring (201.7620, 52.2367) 36.313 9,733 268.0 6,288 173.2 DEX-fall (… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The completeness and contamination of the HETDEX HDR4 AGN sample in each HETDEX g-band magnitude bin. Completeness is estimated from the cross-matched sample between the SDSS DR16Q sample and all HETDEX HDR4 fibers. The black squares connected with a dashed line show t…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The redshift distributions of the HETDEX HDR4 AGN catalog. The blue histogram is for the full 15,940 AGN set. The orange histogram excludes the single intermediate broad line AGN candidates (agn flag=0, Column 7 in Ta￾ble 2). The green histogram further excludes the AG…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Example HETDEX AGN spectra covering the redshift range of the catalog. The resolution of the spectra is 2 ˚A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N., Adelman-McCarthy, J

    Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Ag¨ ueros, M. A., et al. 2009, ApJS, 182, 543, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 2009

  2. [2]

    C., Magnier, E

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560 Ch´ avez Ortiz,´O. A., Finkelstein, S. L., Davis, D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc403

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.05560 2016

  3. [3]

    M., et al

    Davis, D., Gebhardt, K., Cooper, E. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb0ca

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb0ca 2023

  4. [4]

    A., Magnier, E

    Flewelling, H. A., Magnier, E. A., Chambers, K. C., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abb82d 2020

  5. [5]

    2006, A&A, 457, 79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065376

    Gavignaud, I., Bongiorno, A., Paltani, S., et al. 2006, A&A, 457, 79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065376

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065376 2006

  6. [6]

    2021, ApJ, 923, 217, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e03

    Gebhardt, K., Mentuch Cooper, E., Ciardullo, R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 217, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e03

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e03 2021

  7. [7]

    J., Lee, H., MacQueen, P

    Hill, G. J., Lee, H., MacQueen, P. J., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 298, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac2c02

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac2c02 2021

  8. [8]

    J., van Breukelen, C., & Wilman, R

    Jarvis, M. J., van Breukelen, C., & Wilman, R. J. 2005, MNRAS, 358, L11, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00017.x

    arXiv 2005

Show all 16 references
  1. [9]

    M., et al

    Liu, C., Gebhardt, K., Cooper, E. M., et al. 2022a, ApJS, 261, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6ba6

    doi

  2. [10]

    2022b, ApJ, 940, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9af2

    Liu, C., Gebhardt, K., Kollatschny, W., et al. 2022b, ApJ, 940, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9af2

    doi

  3. [11]

    M., et al

    Liu, C., Gebhardt, K., Cooper, E. M., et al. 2022c, ApJ, 935, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8054

    doi

  4. [12]

    W., Higley, A

    Lyke, B. W., Higley, A. N., McLane, J. N., et al. 2020, ApJS, 250, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aba623 Mentuch Cooper, E., Gebhardt, K., Davis, D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 943, 177, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca962 Pˆ aris, I., Petitjean, P., Aubourg,´E., et al. 2018, A&A, 613, A51, doi: ...

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    W., Adams, M

    Ramsey, L. W., Adams, M. T., Barnes, T. G., et al. 1998, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 3352, Advanced Technology Optical/IR Telescopes VI, ed. L. M. Stepp, 34–42, doi: 10.1117/12.319287

    1998 doi

  6. [14]

    2010, AJ, 139, 2440, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2440

    Roeser, S., Demleitner, M., & Schilbach, E. 2010, AJ, 139, 2440, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2440

    2010 doi

  7. [15]

    C., Greisen, E

    Wells, D. C., Greisen, E. W., & Harten, R. H. 1981, A&AS, 44, 363

    1981

  8. [16]

    G., Adelman, J., Anderson, John E., J., et al

    York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, John E., J., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 1579, doi: 10.1086/301513 15 Figure 7. Example HETDEX AGN spectra covering the redshift range of the catalog. The resolution of the spectra is 2 ˚A

    2000 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.