Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Chirality encoding in resonant metasurfaces governed by lattice symmetries

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The chiral response of a metasurface vanishes at angles set by lattice and meta-atom mirror symmetries.

desk verdict A clean symmetry rule for achiral anchor angles in resonant metasurfaces, verified in simulation and partly in experiment; the C3v/square data leave one reproducibility gap that a referee should probe. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.20955 v1 pith:ME6LEV7P submitted 2024-12-30 physics.optics

Ivan Sinev , Felix Ulrich Richter , Ivan Toftul , Nikita Glebov , Kirill Koshelev , Yongsop Hwang , David G. Lancaster , Yuri Kivshar
show 1 more author
Hatice Altug
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords chiralmetasurfacescirculardichroismselectionruleslatticesymmetrymeta-atomrotationBravaislatticesmid-infraredphotonicsresonantmodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

An achiral metasurface can be made chiral simply by rotating its mirror-symmetric building blocks relative to the lattice that holds them. This paper establishes a selection rule for all five planar Bravais lattices: the circular dichroism (CD) of a metasurface made of $C_{nv}$ meta-atoms on a substrate is forced to zero at the discrete rotation angles $\beta = s\pi/\mathrm{lcm}(m,n)$, where $m$ is the number of in-plane mirror lines of the lattice and $n$ is the number of mirror lines of the meta-atom. These zeros are symmetry-protected, meaning they survive regardless of which resonant modes are excited, and they act as anchor points for tuning the chiral response. The authors verify the rule numerically and experimentally with mid-infrared chiral gradient metasurfaces and use it to encode images simultaneously in transmission and CD. If correct, the rule turns chirality from a case-by-case design problem into a predictable, parameter-controlled quantity.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the mirror-axis matching condition plus a counting identity. In a Bravais lattice with $m$ in-plane mirror lines and a $C_{nv}$ meta-atom with $n$ mirror lines, the symmetry axes are spaced by $\pi/m$ and $\pi/n$. Rotating the meta-atom through $\beta$ brings some axis $i\pi/m$ into coincidence with some axis $j\pi/n$; the smallest such rotation is $\min_{i,j}|i\pi/m - j\pi/n| = \pi/\mathrm{lcm}(m,n)$ by B\'ezout's identity. When such a coincidence occurs, the whole pattern has a mirror plane and all chiral optical observables vanish. The derivation is purely geometric and makes no reference to the resonant mode structure, which is why the zeros are robust.

What would settle it

Enumerate all symmetry operations of the periodic pattern, including glide reflections, for a representative combination such as a $C_{3v}$ spinner on a square lattice; if an achiral angle appears that is not of the form $s\pi/\mathrm{lcm}(3,4)=s\pi/12$, the anchor set is incomplete. A normal-incidence CD measurement at a predicted anchor angle that returns a nonzero value would likewise disprove the rule.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a periodic array of achiral $C_{nv}$ meta-atoms on a substrate that breaks out-of-plane mirror symmetry, the metasurface becomes achiral exactly when one of the meta-atom's $n$ mirror planes coincides with one of the lattice's $m$ mirror planes. The angular spacing between such coincidences is $\Delta\beta = \pi/\mathrm{lcm}(m,n)$, so the chiral response, quantified by total circular dichroism $CD_{tot}=(T_R-T_L)/(T_R+T_L)$, must vanish at $\beta = s\pi/\mathrm{lcm}(m,n)$. The paper proves this by minimizing the angular distance between the two mirror-axis sets and invoking B\'ezout's identity, and it confirms the zeros in full-wave simulations for square and hexagonal lattices with $C_{2v}$ bars and $C_{3v}$ spinners. Experimentally, gradient metasurfaces that sweep $\beta$ along the chip show robust CD zeros at the predicted angles, with the maxima between anchors reaching |CD| values above 0.8. The same design principle is then used to encode two independent images in one metasurface, one in unpolarized transmission and one in CD.

Load-bearing premise

The rule assumes that a mirror-line match between lattice and meta-atom is the only way the periodic pattern can become achiral, so it does not consider glide reflections or other improper symmetries that lack a pure mirror line.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Designers of chiral metasurfaces can choose any combination of a $C_{nv}$ resonator and one of the five Bravais lattices and know in advance the set of rotation angles that give exactly zero chirality.
  • Because the CD curve is anti-symmetric about each anchor angle, a structure whose maximum chirality reaches $|CD|=1$ can access the full $[-1,1]$ range simply by varying $\beta$.
  • A continuous gradient of $\beta$ across a chip maps the entire chirality-versus-angle curve into a single sample, so one fabrication run characterizes the full symmetry pair.
  • The amplitude-encoding scheme uses individual unit cells as pixels, allowing images to be written into transmission and CD simultaneously without polarization optics for readout.
  • Lower-symmetry lattices give larger CD maxima but a narrower transmission encoding range, while hexagonal lattices balance the two channels, making the lattice choice a design trade-off.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: the same anchor-angle formula should hold for reflection CD and for co-polarized CD, since those observables are also odd under the mirror operation; comparing zero sets across observables would isolate extrinsic-chirality contributions.
  • One consequence left implicit: if a glide-reflection symmetry can make a two-dimensional pattern achiral without aligning any mirror lines, the formula would undercount the zeros; enumerating the full diperiodic group for one-motif unit cells would either close this gap or reveal additional anchors.
  • The rule should transfer to plasmonic metasurfaces and to other resonant platforms, because it depends only on symmetry and not on material; measuring the same anchor angles with metal resonators would test that transfer.
  • Near a symmetry anchor, CD should grow linearly with detuning $\delta\beta$, offering a simple analog control knob for chirality and setting the practical resolution of the encoding scheme.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a universal, parameter-free selection rule for the chiral optical response of planar metasurfaces made of C_nv-symmetric meta-atoms on a substrate. For a Bravais lattice with m in-plane mirror lines and a meta-atom with n mirror lines, it predicts that the total circular dichroism vanishes at relative rotation angles β = sπ/lcm(m,n) (Eq. 1, Table 1), and that these 'anchor' angles are independent of the resonant modes of the metasurface. The authors validate the rule with CST simulations and mid-IR experiments on Ge-on-CaF2 gradient metasurfaces for C2v and C3v resonators in square and hexagonal lattices, and in the supplementary for rectangular and monoclinic lattices. They further demonstrate simultaneous image encoding in transmission and circular dichroism, using the symmetry-protected zeros to expand the dynamic range of the chiral signal.

Significance. If fully validated, this is a useful and elegant contribution: it reduces the design of a resonant chiral metasurface to a single geometric parameter β, with a closed-form expression for the chirality-canceling angles that does not require numerical optimization. The derivation is elementary (Bézout's identity) and the anchor-zero predictions are confirmed by simulations and, for most tested combinations, by experiments; the gradient-metasurface platform and the dual-channel image encoding are convincing applications. The only fitted quantity is the imaginary part of the Ge permittivity, which affects CD amplitudes but not the locations of the zeros, so the zeros themselves are independent predictions. The main limitations are the missing necessity proof for the selection rule (the converse of mirror-line matching) and an incomplete quantitative explanation of the mode-dependent C3v/square experimental nodes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Supplementary S1, Eq. (1), Table 1] The derivation in Supplementary S1 establishes the angular positions at which a lattice mirror line coincides with a meta-atom mirror line, and this condition is sufficient for achirality. It does not prove, however, that these are the only achiral orientations: the text does not rule out other improper isometries such as glide reflections. Because Table 1 labels all non-anchor angles as chiral and Eq. (1) is presented as a complete selection rule, this necessity step is load-bearing. I expect it can be closed by noting that, for one C_nv motif per primitive cell centered at a lattice point, any improper isometry of the combined pattern must have a reflection direction that is simultaneously a lattice automorphism direction and a motif mirror direction; the authors should add this argument explicitly.
  2. [§4, Fig. 4c; Supplementary S4] The experimental C3v/square map shows the predicted Δβ=15° zeros only for the mode near 1570 cm−1; for the modes at 1320 and 1400 cm−1 the measured nodes are spaced by Δβ=60° instead. The manuscript attributes this to oblique incidence and extrinsic chirality, but Supplementary S4 demonstrates the oblique-incidence effect only for C2v/square at a polar angle of 5° and does not reproduce the C3v/square maps at the relevant frequencies. Because the central claim is that the zeros are robust and independent of the resonant modes, this mode-dependent discrepancy is a load-bearing experimental gap. The authors should provide quantitative evidence, for example oblique-incidence simulations for C3v/square, that the intermediate 15° nodes are filled by extrinsic chirality while the 60° nodes survive, or they should qualify the claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Supplementary S1, after Eq. (6)] The text states that the number of zeros in the interval [0, π/2] is N = lcm(m,n)/2; for lcm(4,3)=12 this gives 6, but the set of zeros {0, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, 90°} contains 7 angles. The formula counts intervals rather than zeros, or the interval endpoints should be excluded; please correct this.
  2. [Main text, §2] The sentence 'The later one is the showcase of our choice in this work.' is a duplicated fragment of the preceding sentence and should be removed.
  3. [Eq. (1), Table 1] Equation (1) is not defined for the monoclinic case m=0; the table handles this case qualitatively, but a brief parenthetical noting that Eq. (1) applies for m,n>0 would avoid confusion.
  4. [Supplementary S1 and S2] There are typos in the supplementary text: 'Assumming' in S1 and 'afformentioned' in S2; please correct them.
  5. [Fig. 4c and Supplementary S5] The transmission-CD data for the C3v/square sample are noisy because of low transmission; a direct overlay of the reflection-CD map from Supplementary S5 with the transmission-CD map in the main text would make the claimed node spacing easier to assess.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the selection-rule zeros are derived from Bezout’s identity and verified against independent simulations and measurements; the only fitted quantity affects CD amplitudes, not zero angles.

full rationale

The central claim, Eq. (1), Δβ = π/lcm(m,n), is derived in Supplementary Section S1 as a self-contained geometric calculation: the minimum angle between two sets of mirror axes is obtained by minimizing |in−jm| and invoking Bézout’s identity. The inputs are the definition of chirality as absence of a mirror plane and the assumed C_nv/mirror-line taxonomy of meta-atom and lattice; no parameter is fitted to the CD data to produce the zero angles. The predicted zero angles are then tested against full-wave CST simulations and FTIR measurements of chiral gradient metasurfaces, and the agreement is external to the derivation. The only fitted quantity explicitly mentioned is the imaginary part of the germanium permittivity, chosen to match spectral shapes and resonance positions; this affects CD amplitudes but not the symmetry-determined zero locations. The supplementary use of Ref. [41], whose authors overlap with the present paper, to state that cross-polarized transmission is prohibited for C_n with n≥3 is not load-bearing for the central selection rule: the same zeros are exhibited in the paper’s own simulations and measured maps, and the C2v cases in Supplementary Figure 7 directly compute the cross-polarization difference instead of relying on that citation. The unproved necessity of a mirror-line match, including the absence of an explicit treatment of possible glide symmetries, is an incompleteness or correctness risk rather than a circular reduction; it does not make the prediction equivalent to its inputs. The experimental discrepancy for the C3v/square sample at 1320 and 1400 cm−1, where nodes are spaced by 60° instead of 15°, is presented as a limitation and attributed to oblique-incidence extrinsic chirality; this is a validation gap, not evidence that the prediction was obtained from the data. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and the predictions are not forced by fitting or by self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard symmetry analysis and one fitted simulation parameter (Ge losses). No invented physical entities are introduced; the 'anchor points' and 'chiral gradient metasurface' are design concepts, not new entities.

free parameters (1)
  • Imaginary part of Ge permittivity (loss level) = εGe = 17.45 + i0.1668
    Chosen by fitting the spectral shape and position of the resonances in simulations (Methods, Simulations). This affects the absolute CD amplitudes at intermediate angles but not the symmetry-protected zero locations.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Bezout's identity: for coprime m', n' there exist integers i, j with |i n' - j m'| = 1
    Used in Supplementary S1 to prove Δβ_min = π/lcm(m,n).
  • domain assumption A 2D periodic pattern of identical C_nv meta-atoms (one per unit cell) is achiral iff at least one meta-atom mirror line coincides with a lattice mirror line.
    The paper's core symmetry argument (main text, 'Lattice vs. resonator symmetries' and Table 1). It ignores glide lines as possible additional improper symmetries, though for one motif per cell this is expected to hold.
  • domain assumption The CaF2 substrate breaks the out-of-plane mirror symmetry, so the structures can possess 3D chirality.
    States that the out-of-plane mirror symmetry is broken 'by default due to the presence of a substrate' (main text).
  • domain assumption Total CD (TR - TL)/(TR + TL) is a valid measure of chirality, and its zeros coincide with the symmetry-protected anchors.
    The paper defines CDtot in Eq. (2) and justifies the equivalence of its zeros to the symmetry zeros in Supplementary S2 by calculating cross-polarized terms.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chirality encoding in resonant metasurfaces governed by lattice symmetries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ME6LEV7P

@misc{pith2026241220955,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chirality encoding in resonant metasurfaces governed by lattice symmetries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ME6LEV7P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.20955}
}
read the original abstract

Chiral metasurfaces provide invaluable tools capable of controlling structured light required for biosensing, photochemistry, holography, and quantum photonics. Here we suggest and realize a universal strategy for controlling the chiral response of resonant metasurfaces via the interplay of meta-atom geometry and lattice arrangements within all five possible planar Bravais symmetries. By introducing chiral gradient metasurfaces, we illustrate how our approach allows producing a predictable chiral response tunable by simple parameter variations. We highlight that symmetry-controlled chiral response provides an additional degree of freedom in optical signal processing, and showcase this with simultaneous mid-IR image encoding in two fundamental quantities, transmission and circular dichroism. Our proposed concept represents a universal toolkit for on-demand design and control of chiral metastructures that has potential for numerous applications in life sciences, quantum optics and more.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.20955 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Concept of chiral encoding using the interplay between lattice and meta￾atoms symmetries. a Artistic view of a chip hosting a chiral gradient metasurface and a metasurface encoding an image in circular dichroism signal in the mid-IR spectral range. The inset shows a tilted angle SEM image of a metasurface encoding a chiral image. b Schematic illustrating the interaction of the metasurface lattice symmetry with the r… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Simulations of circular dichroism for different lattice and resonator symmetries. a-d Schematic of the lattice symmetries and unit cell configuration for four type of metasurfaces: (a,b) based on C2v bar resonator and (c,d) based on C3v spinner resonator. e-f Corresponding calculated maps of circular dichroism (CD) depending on the excitation wavelength and rotation angle of the resonator. The maps demonstrate angle… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Concept of chiral gradient metasurfaces. a Schematic illustration of the chiral gradient metasurface with bar resonators arranged in a square lattice. The rotation angle β of the resonator within the unit cell varies smoothly along the chip coordinate. The color of the bars encodes the chiral signal characteristic for the corresponding β. b Optical image of the fabricated chiral gradient metasurface based on Ge reso… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental results for custom combinations of resonator and lattice symmetries. a C2v/hexagonal, b C3v/hexagonal, c C3v/rectangular. Top row: SEM im￾ages and unit cell schematics of the fabricated chiral gradient metasurfaces. Bottom row: experimentally measured spec…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spatial variations of chirality for information encoding. a Mechanism of encoding information in transmission image. Each scale of the resonator corresponds to a different level of transmission signal at a target wavelength ω0. b Mechanism of encoding information in ch…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of meta-atom rotation with C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top row: Schematic and geometric parameters of meta-atoms with C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: a-c Schematic of the lattice symmetries and unit cell configuration for three types of metasurfaces based on C2v bar resonator. d-i Corresponding d-f measured and g-i calculated maps of chiral signal depending on the excitation wavelength and rotation angle of the reso…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Maps of transmission spectra and chirality signal for C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Maps of reflection chirality signal for four type of metasurfaces: based on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Calculated electric field distributions |E| for frequencies corresponding to resonant modes of C2v (a) and C3v (b) resonators in square lattice excited by a plane wave of amplitude E0, linearly polarized along the y axis. Dashed lines show the positions of orthogonal …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Calculated transmission spectra for the right- and left-circularly polarized light [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Calculated maps of transmission spectra ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Calculated unpolarized light transmission spectra for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 2 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Maximal optical chirality via mode coupling in bilayer metasurfaces

    physics.optics 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Bilayer membrane metasurfaces with rotated C4-symmetric holes achieve near-maximal circular dichroism through two distinct mode-coupling scenarios combined with engineered loss.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Kelvin, W. T. The molecular tactics of a crystal ; Clarendon Press, 1894; p 27

    work page

  2. [2]

    Electromagnetic Chirality, Part 1: The Microscopic Perspective [Electromagnetic Perspectives]

    Caloz, C.; Sihvola, A. Electromagnetic Chirality, Part 1: The Microscopic Perspective [Electromagnetic Perspectives]. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2020, 62, 58–71

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Electromagnetic Chirality, Part 2: The Macroscopic Perspective [Electromagnetic Perspectives]

    Caloz, C.; Sihvola, A. Electromagnetic Chirality, Part 2: The Macroscopic Perspective [Electromagnetic Perspectives]. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2020, 62, 82–98

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Barron, L. D. From Cosmic Chirality to Protein Structure: Lord Kelvin’s Legacy. Chi- rality 2012, 24, 879–893

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Smith, S. W. Chiral Toxicology: It’s the Same Thing. . . Only Different. Toxicological Sciences 2009, 110, 4–30

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Circular Dichroism and Magnetic Circular Dichroism Spec- troscopy for Organic Chemists ; Royal Society of Chemistry, 2011

    Kobayashi, N.; Muranaka, A. Circular Dichroism and Magnetic Circular Dichroism Spec- troscopy for Organic Chemists ; Royal Society of Chemistry, 2011

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Fasman, G. D. Circular dichroism and the conformational analysis of biomolecules ; Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. 33

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    D.; Abendroth, J

    Aiello, C. D.; Abendroth, J. M.; Abbas, M.; Afanasev, A.; Agarwal, S.; Banerjee, A. S.; Beratan, D. N.; Belling, J. N.; Berche, B.; Botana, A.; Caram, J. R.; Celardo, G. L.; Cuniberti, G.; Garcia-Etxarri, A.; Dianat, A.; Diez-Perez, I.; Guo, Y.; Gutierrez, R.; Herrmann, C.; Hihath, J.; Kale, S.; Kurian, P.; Lai, Y.-C.; Liu, T.; Lopez, A.; Med- ina, E.; Mu...

    work page 2022

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    A.; Johnson, W

    Baase, W. A.; Johnson, W. C. Circular dichroism and DNA secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979, 6, 797–814

    1979

  2. [11]

    A.; He, H.; Pham-Huy, C

    Nguyen, L. A.; He, H.; Pham-Huy, C. Chiral Drugs: An Overview. International Journal of Biomedical Science : IJBS 2006, 2, 85

    2006

  3. [12]

    Emergent quantum confinement at topological insulator surfaces

    Bahramy, M.; King, P.; de la Torre, A.; Chang, J.; Shi, M.; Patthey, L.; Balakrishnan, G.; Hofmann, P.; Arita, R.; Nagaosa, N.; Baumberger, F. Emergent quantum confinement at topological insulator surfaces. Nature Communications 2012, 3

    2012

  4. [13]

    Chiral quantum optics

    Lodahl, P.; Mahmoodian, S.; Stobbe, S.; Rauschenbeutel, A.; Schneeweiss, P.; Volz, J.; Pichler, H.; Zoller, P. Chiral quantum optics. Nature 2017, 541, 473–480

    2017

  5. [14]

    Multiplexed Anticounterfeiting Meta-image Displays with Single-Sized Nanostructures

    Deng, J.; Deng, L.; Guan, Z.; Tao, J.; Li, G.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Yu, S.; Zheng, G. Multiplexed Anticounterfeiting Meta-image Displays with Single-Sized Nanostructures. Nano Letters 2020, 20, 1830–1838

    2020

  6. [15]

    Singh, S.; Bhardwaj, S.; Choudhary, N.; Patgiri, R.; Teramoto, Y.; Maji, P. K. Stimuli- Responsive Chiral Cellulose Nanocrystals Based Self-Assemblies for Security Measures 34 to Prevent Counterfeiting: A Review. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16, 41743–41765

    2024

  7. [16]

    Metalenses: Versatile multifunctional photonic com- ponents

    Khorasaninejad, M.; Capasso, F. Metalenses: Versatile multifunctional photonic com- ponents. Science 2017, 358

    2017

  8. [17]

    Advances in optical metalenses

    Arbabi, A.; Faraon, A. Advances in optical metalenses. Nat. Photonics 2023, 17, 16–25

    2023

  9. [18]

    L.; Zeng, S.; Bi, R.; Tai, K.; Dholakia, K.; Olivo, M

    Zhang, S.; Wong, C. L.; Zeng, S.; Bi, R.; Tai, K.; Dholakia, K.; Olivo, M. Metasurfaces for biomedical applications: imaging and sensing from a nanophotonics perspective. Nanophotonics 2021, 10, 259–293

    2021

  10. [19]

    N.; Kivshar, Y

    Tittl, A.; Leitis, A.; Liu, M.; Yesilkoy, F.; Choi, D.-Y.; Neshev, D. N.; Kivshar, Y. S.; Altug, H. Imaging-based molecular barcoding with pixelated dielectric metasurfaces. Science 2018, 360, 1105–1109

    2018

  11. [20]

    Nonlinear metasurfaces: a paradigm shift in nonlinear optics

    Krasnok, A.; Tymchenko, M.; Al` u, A. Nonlinear metasurfaces: a paradigm shift in nonlinear optics. Materials Today 2018, 21, 8–21

    2018

  12. [21]

    U.; Tseng, M

    Jangid, P.; Richter, F. U.; Tseng, M. L.; Sinev, I.; Kruk, S.; Altug, H.; Kivshar, Y. Spectral Tuning of High-Harmonic Generation with Resonance-Gradient Metasurfaces. Advanced Materials 2023, 36

    2023

  13. [22]

    Optical computing metasur- faces: applications and advances

    Zhou, H.; Zhao, C.; He, C.; Huang, L.; Man, T.; Wan, Y. Optical computing metasur- faces: applications and advances. Nanophotonics 2024, 13, 419–441

    2024

  14. [23]

    Hwang, Y.; Davis, T. J. Optical metasurfaces for subwavelength difference operations. Applied Physics Letters 2016, 109, 181101

    2016

  15. [24]

    C.; Edwards, B.; Engheta, N.; Ozcan, A

    Hu, J.; Mengu, D.; Tzarouchis, D. C.; Edwards, B.; Engheta, N.; Ozcan, A. Diffractive optical computing in free space. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1–21. 35

    2024

  16. [25]

    Generalized Pancharatnam-Berry Phase in Rotationally Symmetric Meta-Atoms

    Xie, X.; Pu, M.; Jin, J.; Xu, M.; Guo, Y.; Li, X.; Gao, P.; Ma, X.; Luo, X. Generalized Pancharatnam-Berry Phase in Rotationally Symmetric Meta-Atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021, 126, 183902

    2021

  17. [26]

    Photonics Insights, Vol

    Guo, Y.; Pu, M.; Zhang, F.; Xu, M.; Li, X.; Ma, X.; Luo, X. Photonics Insights, Vol. 1, Issue 1 ; SPIE, 2022; Vol. 1; p R03

    2022

  18. [27]

    S.; Kim, Y.; Kim, I.; Badloe, T.; Zubair, M.; Mehmood, M

    Kim, J.; Rana, A. S.; Kim, Y.; Kim, I.; Badloe, T.; Zubair, M.; Mehmood, M. Q.; Rho, J. Chiroptical Metasurfaces: Principles, Classification, and Applications. Sensors 2021, 21, 4381

    2021

  19. [28]

    P.; Rubin, N

    Balthasar Mueller, J. P.; Rubin, N. A.; Devlin, R. C.; Groever, B.; Capasso, F. Meta- surface Polarization Optics: Independent Phase Control of Arbitrary Orthogonal States of Polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 113901

    2017

  20. [29]

    L.; Cheung, S

    Zhu, H. L.; Cheung, S. W.; Chung, K. L.; Yuk, T. I. Linear-to-Circular Polarization Conversion Using Metasurface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2013, 61, 4615–4623

    2013

  21. [30]

    Conversion between polarization states based on a metasurface

    Teng, S.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, H.; Liu, L.; Lv, H. Conversion between polarization states based on a metasurface. Photonics Res. 2019, 7, 246–250

    2019

  22. [31]

    D.; Dada, A

    Shah, Y. D.; Dada, A. C.; Grant, J. P.; Cumming, D. R. S.; Altuzarra, C.; Nowack, T. S.; Lyons, A.; Clerici, M.; Faccio, D. An All-Dielectric Metasurface Polarimeter. ACS Pho- tonics 2022, 9, 3245–3252

    2022

  23. [32]

    Ding, F.; Chen, Y.; Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Metasurface-Based Polarimeters. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 594

    2018

  24. [33]

    M.; Arbabi, A.; Faraon, A

    Arbabi, E.; Kamali, S. M.; Arbabi, A.; Faraon, A. Full-Stokes Imaging Polarimetry Using Dielectric Metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 2018, 5, 3132–3140

    2018

  25. [34]

    Tang, Y.; Cohen, A. E. Enhanced Enantioselectivity in Excitation of Chiral Molecules by Superchiral Light. Science 2011, 332, 333–336. 36

    2011

  26. [35]

    L.; Askarpour, A

    Mohammadi, E.; Tsakmakidis, K. L.; Askarpour, A. N.; Dehkhoda, P.; Tavakoli, A.; Altug, H. Nanophotonic Platforms for Enhanced Chiral Sensing. ACS Photonics 2018, 5, 2669–2675

    2018

  27. [36]

    L.; Tittl, A.; Altug, H

    Mohammadi, E.; Tavakoli, A.; Dehkhoda, P.; Jahani, Y.; Tsakmakidis, K. L.; Tittl, A.; Altug, H. Accessible Superchiral Near-Fields Driven by Tailored Electric and Magnetic Resonances in All-Dielectric Nanostructures. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 1939–1946

    2019

  28. [37]

    Toward Maximally Elec- tromagnetically Chiral Scatterers at Optical Frequencies

    Garcia-Santiago, X.; Hammerschmidt, M.; Sachs, J.; Burger, S.; Kwon, H.; Kn¨ oller, M.; Arens, T.; Fischer, P.; Fernandez-Corbaton, I.; Rockstuhl, C. Toward Maximally Elec- tromagnetically Chiral Scatterers at Optical Frequencies. ACS Photonics 2022, 9, 1954– 1964

    2022

  29. [38]

    S.; Nauman, A.; Lee, J.; Kim, H

    Khaliq, H. S.; Nauman, A.; Lee, J.; Kim, H. Recent Progress on Plasmonic and Dielectric Chiral Metasurfaces: Fundamentals, Design Strategies, and Implementation. Advanced Optical Materials 2023, 11

    2023

  30. [39]

    Advances on broadband and resonant chiral metasurfaces

    Deng, Q.-M.; Li, X.; Hu, M.-X.; Li, F.-J.; Li, X.; Deng, Z.-L. Advances on broadband and resonant chiral metasurfaces. npj Nanophoton. 2024, 1, 1–22

    2024

  31. [40]

    A.; Zheludev, N

    Plum, E.; Fedotov, V. A.; Zheludev, N. I. Planar metamaterial with transmission and reflection that depend on the direction of incidence. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 131901

    2009

  32. [41]

    Scattering Matrix for Chiral Harmonic Generation and Frequency Mixing in Nonlinear Metasurfaces

    Koshelev, K.; Toftul, I.; Hwang, Y.; Kivshar, Y. Scattering Matrix for Chiral Harmonic Generation and Frequency Mixing in Nonlinear Metasurfaces. J. Opt. 2024, 26, 055003

    2024

  33. [42]

    M.; Canillas, A.; Bosch, S.; Markovich, G.; Kahr, B

    Arteaga, O.; Sancho-Parramon, J.; Nichols, S.; Maoz, B. M.; Canillas, A.; Bosch, S.; Markovich, G.; Kahr, B. Relation between 2D/3D chirality and the appearance of chi- roptical effects in real nanostructures. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 2242–2252

    2016

  34. [43]

    Goerlitzer, E. S. A.; Mohammadi, R.; Nechayev, S.; Volk, K.; Rey, M.; Banzer, P.; Karg, M.; Vogel, N. Chiral Surface Lattice Resonances. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2001330. 37

    2020

  35. [44]

    V.; Antonov, A

    Gorkunov, M. V.; Antonov, A. A.; Kivshar, Y. S. Metasurfaces with Maximum Chirality Empowered by Bound States in the Continuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 093903

    2020

  36. [45]

    Chiral Bilayer All-Dielectric Metasurfaces

    Tanaka, K.; Arslan, D.; Fasold, S.; Steinert, M.; Sautter, J.; Falkner, M.; Pertsch, T.; Decker, M.; Staude, I. Chiral Bilayer All-Dielectric Metasurfaces. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 15926–15935

    2020

  37. [46]

    Core–Shell Plasmonic Nanohelices

    Kosters, D.; de Hoogh, A.; Zeijlemaker, H.; Acar, H.; Rotenberg, N.; Kuipers, L. Core–Shell Plasmonic Nanohelices. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 1858–1863

    2017

  38. [47]

    D.; Sanvitto, D.; Passaseo, A

    Esposito, M.; Tasco, V.; Cuscun` a, M.; Todisco, F.; Benedetti, A.; Tarantini, I.; Giorgi, M. D.; Sanvitto, D.; Passaseo, A. Nanoscale 3D Chiral Plasmonic Helices with Circular Dichroism at Visible Frequencies. ACS Photonics 2015, 2, 105–114

    2015

  39. [48]

    A Helical Metamaterial for Broadband Circular Polarization Conversion

    Kaschke, J.; Blume, L.; Wu, L.; Thiel, M.; Bade, K.; Yang, Z.; Wegener, M. A Helical Metamaterial for Broadband Circular Polarization Conversion. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2015, 3, 1411–1417

    2015

  40. [49]

    S.; Li, X

    Shi, T.; Deng, Z.-L.; Geng, G.; Zeng, X.; Zeng, Y.; Hu, G.; Overvig, A.; Li, J.; Qiu, C.- W.; Al` u, A.; Kivshar, Y. S.; Li, X. Planar chiral metasurfaces with maximal and tunable chiroptical response driven by bound states in the continuum. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1–8

    2022

  41. [50]

    Simultaneous broadband and high circular dichroism with two-dimensional all-dielectric chiral metasurface

    Wang, R.; Wang, C.; Sun, T.; Hu, X.; Wang, C. Simultaneous broadband and high circular dichroism with two-dimensional all-dielectric chiral metasurface. Nanophotonics 2023, 12, 4043–4053

    2023

  42. [51]

    I.; Li, G.; Kivshar, Y

    Koshelev, K.; Tang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Kravchenko, I. I.; Li, G.; Kivshar, Y. Resonant Chiral Effects in Nonlinear Dielectric Metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 2023, 10, 298–306

    2023

  43. [52]

    Nonlinear Chiral Metasurfaces Based on Structured van der Waals Materials

    Tonkaev, P.; Toftul, I.; Lu, Z.; Qin, H.; Qiu, S.; Yang, W.; Koshelev, K.; Lu, Y.; 38 Kivshar, Y. Nonlinear Chiral Metasurfaces Based on Structured van der Waals Materials. Nano Lett. 2024, 24, 10577–10582

    2024

  44. [53]

    Chiral Dichroism in Resonant Metasurfaces with Monoclinic Lattices

    Toftul, I.; Tonkaev, P.; Koshelev, K.; Lai, F.; Song, Q.; Gorkunov, M.; Kivshar, Y. Chiral Dichroism in Resonant Metasurfaces with Monoclinic Lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024, 133, 216901

    2024

  45. [54]

    Manipulating the Chirality of Moir´ e Metasurface by Symmetry Breaking

    Lyu, B.; Li, Y.; Jia, Q.; Li, H.; Yang, G.; Cao, F.; Kou, S.; Liu, D.; Cao, T.; Li, G.; Shi, J. Manipulating the Chirality of Moir´ e Metasurface by Symmetry Breaking. Laser Photonics Rev. 2023, 17, 2201004

    2023

  46. [55]

    H.; Zheng, Y

    Wu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Hill, E. H.; Zheng, Y. Chiral metamaterials via Moir´ e stacking. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 18096–18112

    2018

  47. [56]

    Recent Advances in Ultrathin Chiral Metasurfaces by Twisted Stacking

    Han, Z.; Wang, F.; Sun, J.; Wang, X.; Tang, Z. Recent Advances in Ultrathin Chiral Metasurfaces by Twisted Stacking. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2206141

    2023

  48. [57]

    S.; D ´ ıaz-Rubio, A.; Tretyakov, S

    Asadchy, V. S.; D ´ ıaz-Rubio, A.; Tretyakov, S. A. Bianisotropic metasurfaces: physics and applications. Nanophotonics 2018, 7, 1069–1094

    2018

  49. [58]

    Dual-band strong extrinsic 2D chirality in a highly symmetric metal-dielectric-metal achiral metasurface

    Cao, T.; wei Wei, C.; Li, Y. Dual-band strong extrinsic 2D chirality in a highly symmetric metal-dielectric-metal achiral metasurface. Opt. Mater. Express 2016, 6, 303–311

    2016

  50. [59]

    J.; Lin, J.; Yuan, X.-C

    Hwang, Y.; Hopkins, B.; Wang, D.; Mitchell, A.; Davis, T. J.; Lin, J.; Yuan, X.-C. Optical Chirality from Dark-Field Illumination of Planar Plasmonic Nanostructures. Laser & Photonics Reviews 2017, 11, 1700216

    2017

  51. [60]

    M.; Amboli, J.; Zhang, L.; Demesy, G.; Bonod, N.; Bouj- day, S.; Kildemo, M.; Gallas, B

    Nicolas, M.; Walmsness, P. M.; Amboli, J.; Zhang, L.; Demesy, G.; Bonod, N.; Bouj- day, S.; Kildemo, M.; Gallas, B. True Circular Dichroism in Optically Active Achiral Metasurfaces and Its Relation to Chiral Near-Fields. ACS Applied Optical Materials 2023, 1, 1360–1366. 39

    2023

  52. [61]

    Achiral, Helicity Preserving, and Resonant Structures for Enhanced Sensing of Chiral Molecules

    Graf, F.; Feis, J.; Garcia-Santiago, X.; Wegener, M.; Rockstuhl, C.; Fernandez- Corbaton, I. Achiral, Helicity Preserving, and Resonant Structures for Enhanced Sensing of Chiral Molecules. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 482–491

    2019

  53. [62]

    S.; Barron, L

    Gilroy, C.; Hashiyada, S.; Endo, K.; Karimullah, A. S.; Barron, L. D.; Okamoto, H.; Togawa, Y.; Kadodwala, M. Roles of Superchirality and Interference in Chiral Plasmonic Biodetection. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 15195–15203

    2019

  54. [63]

    A.; Giessen, H.; Weiss, T

    Both, S.; Sch¨ aferling, M.; Sterl, F.; Muljarov, E. A.; Giessen, H.; Weiss, T. Nanophotonic Chiral Sensing: How Does It Actually Work? ACS Nano 2022, 16, 2822–2832

    2022

  55. [64]

    N.; Dolgaleva, K.; Boyd, R

    Volkov, S. N.; Dolgaleva, K.; Boyd, R. W.; Jefimovs, K.; Turunen, J.; Svirko, Y.; Can- field, B. K.; Kauranen, M. Optical activity in diffraction from a planar array of achiral nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 79, 043819

    2009

  56. [65]

    Angle-selective chiral absorption induced by diffractive coupling in metasurfaces

    Meng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Lai, Z.; Yu, T. Angle-selective chiral absorption induced by diffractive coupling in metasurfaces. Opt. Lett. 2022, 47, 5385– 5388

    2022

  57. [66]

    V.; Kong, X.-T.; Wang, Z.; Govorov, A

    Movsesyan, A.; Besteiro, L. V.; Kong, X.-T.; Wang, Z.; Govorov, A. O. Engineering Strongly Chiral Plasmonic Lattices with Achiral Unit Cells for Sensing and Photodetec- tion. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 10, 2101943

    2022

  58. [67]

    Y.; Movsesyan, A.; Kong, X.-T.; Yu, P.; Besteiro, L

    ´Avalos Ovando, O.; Santiago, E. Y.; Movsesyan, A.; Kong, X.-T.; Yu, P.; Besteiro, L. V.; Khorashad, L. K.; Okamoto, H.; Slocik, J. M.; Correa-Duarte, M. A.; Comesa˜ na- Hermo, M.; Liedl, T.; Wang, Z.; Markovich, G.; Burger, S.; Govorov, A. O. Chiral Bioinspired Plasmonics: A ...

    2022

  59. [68]

    J.; Aigner, A.; G¨ olz, T.; Tittl, A.; de S

    Gryb, D.; Wendisch, F. J.; Aigner, A.; G¨ olz, T.; Tittl, A.; de S. Menezes, L.; Maier, S. A. Two-Dimensional Chiral Metasurfaces Obtained by Geometrically Simple Meta-atom Rotations. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 8891–8897. 40

    2023

  60. [69]

    V.; Antonov, A

    Gorkunov, M. V.; Antonov, A. A.; Mamonova, A. V.; Muljarov, E. A.; Kivshar, Y. Substrate-Induced Maximum Optical Chirality of Planar Dielectric Structures.Adv. Opt. Mater. 2024, n/a, 2402133

    2024

  61. [70]

    Substrate-Induced Chirality in an Indi- vidual Nanostructure

    Nechayev, S.; Barczyk, R.; Mick, U.; Banzer, P. Substrate-Induced Chirality in an Indi- vidual Nanostructure. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 1876–1881

    2019

  62. [71]

    Introduction to Solid State Physics , 8th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2005

    Kittel, C. Introduction to Solid State Physics , 8th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, 2005

    2005

  63. [72]

    Anisotropic Dissymmetry Factor, g: Theoretical Investigation on Single Molecule Chi- roptical Spectroscopy

    Wakabayashi, M.; Yokojima, S.; Fukaminato, T.; Shiino, K.; Irie, M.; Nakamura, S. Anisotropic Dissymmetry Factor, g: Theoretical Investigation on Single Molecule Chi- roptical Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 5046–5057

    2014

  64. [73]

    D.; Pescitelli, G

    Berova, N.; Bari, L. D.; Pescitelli, G. Application of electronic circular dichroism in configurational and conformational analysis of organic compounds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 914–931

    2007

  65. [74]

    S.; Valero, A

    Shalin, A. S.; Valero, A. C.; Miroshnichenko, A. All-Dielectric Nanophotonics ; Elsevier: San Diego, 2023

    2023

  66. [75]

    V.; Gorkunov, M

    Kondratov, A. V.; Gorkunov, M. V.; Darinskii, A. N.; Gainutdinov, R. V.; Rogov, O. Y.; Ezhov, A. A.; Artemov, V. V. Extreme optical chirality of plasmonic nanohole arrays due to chiral Fano resonance. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 93, 195418

    2016

  67. [76]

    H.; Gu, M

    Leitis, A.; Tittl, A.; Liu, M.; Lee, B. H.; Gu, M. B.; Kivshar, Y. S.; Altug, H. Angle- multiplexed all-dielectric metasurfaces for broadband molecular fingerprint retrieval.Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaaw2871

    2019

  68. [77]

    U.; Sinev, I.; Zhou, S.; Leitis, A.; Oh, S.-H.; Tseng, M

    Richter, F. U.; Sinev, I.; Zhou, S.; Leitis, A.; Oh, S.-H.; Tseng, M. L.; Kivshar, Y.; Altug, H. Gradient High-Q Dielectric Metasurfaces for Broadband Sensing and Control of Vibrational Light-Matter Coupling. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2314279. 41

    2024

  69. [78]

    J.; Lee, H

    Gromyko, D.; An, S.; Gorelik, S.; Xu, J.; Lim, L. J.; Lee, H. Y. L.; Tjiptoharsono, F.; Tan, Z.-K.; Qiu, C.-W.; Dong, Z.; Wu, L. Unidirectional Chiral Emission via Twisted Bi-layer Metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1–10

    2024

  70. [79]

    S.; Feng, J.; Qiu, C.-W.; Wu, L

    Gromyko, D.; Loh, J. S.; Feng, J.; Qiu, C.-W.; Wu, L. Enabling all-to-circular polar- ization upconversion by nonlinear chiral metasurfaces with rotational symmetry. arXiv 2024,

    2024

  71. [80]

    J.; Lu, Y.; Agrawal, A.; Xu, T

    Fan, Q.; Liu, M.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, W.; Wang, Y.; Lin, P.; Yan, F.; Chen, L.; Lezec, H. J.; Lu, Y.; Agrawal, A.; Xu, T. Independent Amplitude Control of Arbitrary Orthogonal States of Polarization via Dielectric Metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 125, 267402

    2020

  72. [81]

    Near-infrared chirality of plasmonic metasurfaces with gold rectangular holes

    Wu, B.; Wang, M.; Sun, Y.; Wu, F.; Shi, Z.; Wu, X. Near-infrared chirality of plasmonic metasurfaces with gold rectangular holes. Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials 2022, 5, 2527–2535. 42

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.