Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 23 references

On the Nature of Subharmonics of the Electron Emission from Ultracold Plasmas

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes that the multiple subharmonics of electron emission from expanding ultracold plasmas arise from quasi-classical multiphoton ionization of secondary Rydberg atoms formed by three-body recombination, not from…

desk verdict A plausible local mechanism for UCP subharmonic emission, but the mapping from ionization peaks to time rests on a temperature law the authors themselves admit is shaky. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00475 v3 pith:O5UCBFXA submitted 2024-12-31 physics.plasm-ph physics.atom-ph

Yurii V. Dumin , Ludmila M. Svirskaya This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phphysics.atom-ph PACS 52.27.Gr52.35.Fp32.80.Rm
keywords ultracoldplasmassubharmonicselectronemissionRydbergatomsthree-bodyrecombinationmultiphotonionizationTonks-Dattnerresonancesadiabaticexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to explain an experimental pattern: ultracold plasma clouds expanding in a monochromatic radio field emit electrons in a series of sharp, evenly spaced bursts, with the spacing changing with irradiation frequency. The authors attribute these bursts to the ionization of Rydberg atoms that are continuously created by three-body recombination as the plasma cools. Because recombination favors states whose principal quantum number grows linearly with time, the system sweeps through a sequence of ionization resonances, producing a train of subharmonics. The mechanism is local, so it avoids the boundary-condition and cloud-shape problems that plagued the earlier Tonks–Dattner standing-wave interpretation. Numerical integration of the classical electron orbit in the rf field yields efficiency peaks and time series that qualitatively match the observed patterns.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quasi-classical multiphoton ionization of a Rydberg electron driven by a monochromatic electric field, solved as a classical two-body problem (Eqs. 20a–20b) with ionization defined as escape to a threshold radius $R_{\rm th}$ rather than to infinity. The efficiency $\eta(\omega/\Omega)$ exhibits peaks when the driving frequency is a rational multiple of the electron's orbital frequency; combined with the recombination law (Eq. 2) and the scaling relations for expansion (Eqs. 4–5), it yields the current formula $I\propto \eta(n_*(t))\,t^3$ (Eq. 10).

What would settle it

Measure the electron temperature evolution directly, for example by recording the plasma expansion speed or using a second probe, while observing the subharmonic peak times; if peaks appear at times that do not track $T_e(t)$ through the predicted linear sweep $n_*(t)\propto T_e^{-1/2}$, or if a deliberately non-adiabatic temperature history (e.g., induced by strong inelastic heating) leaves the peak positions unchanged, the proposed mechanism is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the total electron current from an expanding ultracold plasma irradiated by a monochromatic rf wave is governed by the ionization efficiency of secondary Rydberg atoms, $I \propto \eta(n_*(t))\, t^3$ (Eq. 10), where $\eta$ is the phase-averaged probability that an electron reaches a threshold radius and becomes free, and $n_*(t)\propto t$ is the principal quantum number of the recombined atoms, which grows linearly as the electron temperature decays adiabatically ($T_e\propto 1/t^2$). The ionization efficiency as a function of $\omega/\Omega$ shows sharp peaks at ratios corresponding to rational multiples of the orbital frequency, so the linear time growth of $n_*$ translates into a series of emission subharmonics. This picture is independent of the plasma cloud's boundary conditions and overall shape, which is exactly what the experimental tests showed. The argument requires the recombined atoms to occupy a single, well-defined Rydberg state and the electron temperature to follow the adiabatic decay; the paper flags deviations from this law as a known limitation.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes the electron temperature falls strictly as $1/t^2$ during the expansion and that all recombined electrons populate a single Rydberg state with principal quantum number growing linearly in time, so the ionization resonances are swept through in a predictable order.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The subharmonic peaks should be insensitive to the plasma cloud's boundary conditions and shape, consistent with experiments using an opaque wire that distorted the initial density distribution.
  • Increasing the irradiation frequency should produce more numerous but shallower subharmonics, as the same pulse contains more wave periods; this matches the experimental trend.
  • The mechanism predicts a characteristic time scale: the subharmonic pattern should become stable after roughly six wave periods of interaction, so short rf pulses of about 1 microsecond should already show the full series.
  • The temperature decay $T_e \propto 1/t^2$ is directly tied to the timing of the peaks; any measurable deviation should shift the emission series.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed, the model would make the subharmonic series a practical thermometer for ultracold-plasma temperature evolution, since the peak times encode $n_*(t)$ and hence $T_e(t)$.
  • The same resonance-sweeping mechanism might operate in other expanding or cooling systems where Rydberg atoms form, such as laser-cooled gases or seeded supersonic expansions, suggesting a generic route to subharmonic emission in driven Rydberg media.
  • A more complete treatment with a distribution of Rydberg states (as the authors call for) could turn the qualitative match into quantitative predictions; deviations between the single-state model and the full distribution would show up earliest in the relative amplitudes of the subharmonics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that the multiple subharmonics of electron emission observed when an expanding ultracold plasma is irradiated by monochromatic radiowaves arise from quasi-classical multiphoton ionization of secondary Rydberg atoms formed by three-body recombination, rather than from Tonks–Dattner standing-wave resonances. The total electron current is modeled as I ∝ η(n*(t)) t^3, where η is the phase-averaged ionization efficiency of a Rydberg electron in a monochromatic field, and n*(t) ∝ t follows from adiabatic cooling T_e ∝ t^{-2} and the assumption that recombination populates a single Rydberg state. Classical trajectory simulations for a circular Rydberg orbit produce sharp peaks of η as a function of ω/Ω, which are then mapped to temporal subharmonics through the linear quantum-number sweep. The paper compares the resulting patterns qualitatively with the experiment of Ref. 11 and shows in appendices that the qualitative subharmonic structure persists over ranges of the field amplitude and threshold radius.

Significance. If the proposed mechanism is correct, it would provide a local, shape-insensitive alternative to the Tonks–Dattner interpretation, naturally explaining the insensitivity of the observed subharmonics to cloud shape and the lack of need for artificial boundary conditions. The algebraic scaling from three-body recombination to I ∝ η t^3 is transparent, and the classical equations of motion for the Rydberg electron are standard. The paper is honest about its limitations, admitting in footnote 1 that T_e evolution can deviate from the adiabatic law and in the Conclusions that a realistic model must include a distribution over quantum states. However, the central claim is currently supported only qualitatively: there is no quantitative comparison with the experimental data, and several load-bearing assumptions are unchecked. The manuscript would benefit from addressing these points before publication.

major comments (4)
  1. [§II.B, Eq. (5) and footnote 1] The linear sweep n*(t) ∝ t in Eq. (9), which converts the ionization-efficiency peaks of Fig. 3 into the temporal subharmonics of Fig. 4, rests entirely on the adiabatic law T_e ∝ t^{-2} in Eq. (5). The paper's own footnote 1 concedes that T_e evolution in ultracold plasmas can deviate substantially from this law (refs. 18, 19). Since any deviation changes n*(t) and therefore shifts the peak positions in Fig. 4, the central prediction is not robust unless a quantitative bound on the deviation is given or a sensitivity analysis is provided.
  2. [§II.B, Eq. (9) and Conclusions] Equation (9) assumes that all recombined electrons populate a single state n*(t), and the Conclusions acknowledge that a realistic model must include a nontrivial distribution over quantum states (ref. 23). A distribution in n will broaden the phase-averaged efficiency η and can wash out the sharp peaks that are essential for the subharmonic train. The paper should quantify this broadening, for example by convolving the efficiency of Fig. 3 with a plausible recombination distribution, before claiming that the mechanism explains the observations.
  3. [§II.C, Eq. (21) and Fig. 4] The simulation treats the dimensionless field amplitude \tilde{E}_0 as a fixed parameter (0.05), but with a fixed laboratory field E_0 the normalized amplitude scales as \tilde{E}_0 ∝ (a_0 Ω^2)^{-1} ∝ n^4, since a_0 ∝ n^2 and Ω ∝ n^{-3}. As n*(t) grows linearly in time, \tilde{E}_0 grows as t^4 during the sweep in Fig. 4. Appendix B shows that the peak pattern changes qualitatively with \tilde{E}_0, from distinct peaks at 0.02 to merged structure at 0.10. The constant-\tilde{E}_0 assumption is therefore internally inconsistent, and the predicted subharmonics in Fig. 4 are not the ones that would be produced in a self-consistent time integration.
  4. [§III and Fig. 4] The statement that the simulated pattern 'resembles the experimental patterns very well' is supported only by visual inspection. No quantitative comparison with the experimental data of Ref. 11 is given, such as peak positions, relative amplitudes, or the number of subharmonics as a function of field amplitude and frequency. Given the four parameters (A, \tilde{E}_0, \tilde{R}_{th}, Δτ) that can be adjusted, a quantitative comparison, even with error bars, is necessary to substantiate the mechanistic claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Conclusions] The phrase 'because is does not depend' contains a grammatical error; it should read 'because it does not depend'.
  2. [§II.B, Eq. (8)] The symbol E_1 is used for the ground-state binding energy but is not defined; define it explicitly as the hydrogenic ground-state Rydberg energy.
  3. [§II.B, Eq. (9)] The reference time t_0 is introduced without definition; clarify that it is the time at which T_e = T_{e0}.
  4. [Fig. 4 caption] State explicitly that Δτ is measured in units of the unperturbed orbital period 2π/Ω, since the text refers to 'wave periods' and later uses N_per = Δτ/(2π).
  5. [§I, reference to Fig. 1 in Ref. 11] When citing the experimental frequency range, specify the frequency interval over which multiple subharmonics appear, as it is not evident from the text alone.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the ionization-efficiency peaks are computed from an independent classical-trajectory simulation, not fitted to the observed electron-emission subharmonics.

full rationale

The central derivation is constructive: Eq. (10), I ∝ η(n*(t)) t^3, combines an independently simulated ionization efficiency η(ω/Ω) (Sec. II.C, Fig. 3) with a TBR-dominated population n*(t) ∝ t (Eqs. 8–9) and adiabatic expansion scalings (Eqs. 4–5). η is defined as the fraction of classical orbits reaching a threshold radius Rth (Sec. II.C), computed by numerical integration of Eqs. (20a)–(20b) for random initial phases; it is not fitted to the target subharmonic data. The predicted subharmonic train in Fig. 4 is a map of those simulated η peaks onto time through n*(t) ∝ t, not a restatement of the input. The model's free parameters (field amplitude Ẽ0 = 0.05, threshold radius R̃th = 1.5) are documented in Appendices B and C to give a representative pattern over broad ranges, so the qualitative agreement with Ref. 11 is not a forced fit by construction. The one self-citation (ref. 19, Dumin 2011) appears in footnote 1 to concede that Te can deviate substantially from the adiabatic law; it is used to state a limitation rather than to prove the central claim, so it is not load-bearing. Similarly, the paper's admission that a realistic model needs a nontrivial Rydberg-state distribution (conclusions, ref. 23) and the lack of a quantitative comparison of peak positions and amplitudes with Ref. 11 are validation gaps, not circular reductions. No equation in the paper is defined in terms of the target observable, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard plasma expansion and recombination scaling plus several hand-chosen simplifications: single-state recombination, adiabatic Te(t), and a finite ionization threshold. These are acknowledged by the authors as needing ab initio simulation.

free parameters (4)
  • A = O(1), not specified
    Coefficient in Eq (8) relating recombination binding energy to thermal energy; sets the time scale of n*(t) and therefore the spacing of predicted subharmonics.
  • E0_tilde = 0.05
    Dimensionless rf field amplitude chosen as the middle of the range 0.02-0.10 in which subharmonics are visible (Appendix B); not tied to experimental field strength.
  • Rth_tilde = 1.5
    Threshold radius for counting an electron as ionized, chosen below 2.5 rRy; Appendix C shows peaks survive for 1.25-5.0 but positions shift.
  • Delta_tau = 324π for most runs
    Pulse duration in units of Rydberg orbital period; the paper argues 10 wave periods is realistic based on 1 µs pulses at 10 MHz, but the exact value is not fixed by experiment.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Three-body recombination rate scales as Ne^3 Te^(-9/2) (Eq 2, from ref 17).
    Standard collisional recombination formula imported from Massey and Burhop; assumed valid for the UCP conditions.
  • domain assumption Electron temperature decays adiabatically as Te ∝ 1/R^2 with γ=5/3 (Eq 5).
    Assumes inelastic scattering is insignificant; the paper's own footnote 1 notes substantial deviations can occur (refs 18, 19).
  • domain assumption Cloud expands inertially with R ∝ t and Ne ∝ 1/t^3 (Eq 4).
    Assumes free expansion dominates throughout the evolution of the cloud.
  • domain assumption The Rydberg electron can be treated classically in a circular orbit and the wave as a classical field (Eqs 14-20).
    Valid for high n and low photon energy; standard in microwave ionization studies.
  • ad hoc to paper All recombined Rydberg atoms form in a single state n*(t) given by Eq (9).
    Simplification; the paper acknowledges in Conclusions that a distribution over quantum states is needed for definitive conclusions.
  • ad hoc to paper Ionization occurs when the electron reaches a finite threshold radius Rth rather than infinity.
    Crucial modification of earlier Rydberg ionization studies, justified heuristically by plasma microfields; the value Rth = 1.5 rRy is chosen by hand.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Nature of Subharmonics of the Electron Emission from Ultracold Plasmas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/O5UCBFXA

@misc{pith2026250100475,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Nature of Subharmonics of the Electron Emission from Ultracold Plasmas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/O5UCBFXA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00475}
}
read the original abstract

One of the most interesting phenomena in the ultracold plasmas are multiple subharmonics of the electron emission observed after its irradiation by the monochromatic radiowaves. Unfortunately, the early interpretation of this phenomenon as the so-called Tonks-Dattner resonances (i.e., actually the standing Langmuir waves) encountered a number of serious obstacles, such as a lack of the adequate boundary conditions, an incorrect dependence on the electron temperature, and an insensitivity to the shape of the cloud. Here, we suggest an alternative interpretation based on the quasi-classical multiphoton ionization of the 'secondary' Rydberg atoms formed in the expanding and cooling plasma clouds. As follows from our numerical simulations, the efficiency of such ionization exhibits a series of well-expressed peaks. Moreover, this process is evidently irrelevant to the boundary conditions and global shape of the cloud. Therefore, this should be a viable alternative to the earlier idea of Tonks--Dattner resonances.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.00475 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Sketch of the plasma cloud expanding inside the rf resonator. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Motion of the Rydberg electron ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Efficiency of ionization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temporal dependences of the total electron current from the expanding plasma cloud at various durations of interaction of the Rydberg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: They are presented for various duration of interaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Temporal dependences of the total electron current from the expanding plasma cloud at various amplitudes of the external electro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Temporal dependences of the total electron current from the expanding plasma cloud for a set of the various threshold radii [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Killian , author S

    author author T. Killian , author S. Kulin , author S. Bergeson , author L. Orozco , author C. Orzel , \ and\ author S. Rolston ,\ title title Creation of an ultracold neutral plasma , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 4776 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999

  2. [2]

    Gould \ and\ author E

    author author P. Gould \ and\ author E. Eyler ,\ title title Ultracold plasmas come of age , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ World \ volume 14(3) ,\ pages 19 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  3. [3]

    Bergeson \ and\ author T

    author author S. Bergeson \ and\ author T. Killian ,\ title title Ultracold plasmas and R ydberg gases , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ World \ volume 16(2) ,\ pages 37 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  4. [4]

    Killian ,\ title title Ultracold neutral plasmas , \ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 316 ,\ pages 705 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    author author T. Killian ,\ title title Ultracold neutral plasmas , \ @noop journal journal Science \ volume 316 ,\ pages 705 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  5. [5]

    Killian , author T

    author author T. Killian , author T. Pattard , author T. Pohl , \ and\ author J. Rost ,\ title title Ultracold neutral plasmas , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rep. \ volume 449 ,\ pages 77 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  6. [6]

    Mayorov , author A

    author author S. Mayorov , author A. Tkachev , \ and\ author S. Yakovlenko ,\ title title Metastable supercooled plasma , \ @noop journal journal Physics--Uspekhi \ volume 37 ,\ pages 279 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994

  7. [7]

    Morrison , author C

    author author J. Morrison , author C. Rennick , author J. Keller , \ and\ author E. Grant ,\ title title Evolution from a molecular R ydberg gas to an ultracold plasma in a seeded supersonic expansion of NO , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. \ volume 101 ,\ pages 205005 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Zelener , author E

    author author B.B. Zelener , author E. Vilshanskaya , author N. Morozov , author S. Saakyan , author A. Bobrov , author V. Sautenkov , \ and\ author B.V. Zelener ,\ title title Steady-state ultracold plasma created by continuous photoionization of laser cooled atoms , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. \ volume 132 ,\ pages 115301 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page 2024

Show all 23 references
  1. [9]

    Fortov \ and\ author I

    author author V. Fortov \ and\ author I. Iakubov ,\ @noop title The Physics of Non-ideal Plasma \ ( publisher World Sci. ,\ address Singapore ,\ year 2000 ) NoStop

    2000

  2. [10]

    Kulin , author T

    author author S. Kulin , author T. Killian , author S. Bergeson , \ and\ author S. Rolston ,\ title title Plasma oscillations and expansion of an ultracold neutral plasma , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. \ volume 85 ,\ pages 318 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    2000

  3. [11]

    Fletcher , author X

    author author R. Fletcher , author X. Zhang , \ and\ author S. Rolston ,\ title title Observation of collective modes of ultracold plasmas , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. \ volume 96 ,\ pages 105003 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  4. [12]

    Tonks ,\ title title The high frequency behavior of a plasma , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev

    author author L. Tonks ,\ title title The high frequency behavior of a plasma , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev. \ volume 37 ,\ pages 1458 ( year 1931 ) NoStop

    1931

  5. [13]

    Dattner ,\ title title Resonance densities in a cylindrical plasma column , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett

    author author A. Dattner ,\ title title Resonance densities in a cylindrical plasma column , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 205 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

    1963

  6. [14]

    McQuillen , author J

    author author P. McQuillen , author J. Castro , author S. Bradshaw , \ and\ author T. Killian ,\ title title Emergence of kinetic behavior in streaming ultracold neutral plasmas , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Plasmas \ volume 22 ,\ pages 043514 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  7. [15]

    Lyubonko , author T

    author author A. Lyubonko , author T. Pohl , \ and\ author J.-M. \ Rost ,\ title title Collective energy absorption of ultracold plasmas through electronic edge-modes , \ @noop journal journal New J.\ Phys. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 053039 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  8. [16]

    Bronin , author E

    author author S. Bronin , author E. Vikhrov , author S. Saakyan , author B.B. Zelener , \ and\ author B.V. Zelener ,\ title title Electronic resonances in expanding non-neutral ultracold plasma , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Plasmas \ volume 31 ,\ pages 033507 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  9. [17]

    Massey \ and\ author E

    author author H. Massey \ and\ author E. Burhop ,\ @noop title Electronic and Ionic Impact Phenomena \ ( publisher Clarendon ,\ address Oxford, UK ,\ year 1952 ) NoStop

    1952

  10. [18]

    Fletcher , author X

    author author R. Fletcher , author X. Zhang , \ and\ author S. Rolston ,\ title title Using three-body recombination to extract electron temperatures of ultracold plasmas , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. \ volume 99 ,\ pages 145001 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007

  11. [19]

    Dumin ,\ title title Characteristic features of temperature evolution in ultracold plasmas , \ @noop journal journal Plas.\ Phys.\ Rep

    author author Y. Dumin ,\ title title Characteristic features of temperature evolution in ultracold plasmas , \ @noop journal journal Plas.\ Phys.\ Rep. \ volume 37 ,\ pages 858 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  12. [20]

    Delone , author B

    author author N. Delone , author B. Krainov , \ and\ author D. Shepelianskii ,\ title title Highly-excited atoms in the electromagnetic field , \ @noop journal journal Sov.\ Phys.--Uspekhi \ volume 26 ,\ pages 551 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983

  13. [21]

    Gallagher ,\ @noop title Rydberg Atoms \ ( publisher Cambridge Univ

    author author T. Gallagher ,\ @noop title Rydberg Atoms \ ( publisher Cambridge Univ. Press ,\ address Cambridge, UK ,\ year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994

  14. [22]

    Jones , author J

    author author D. Jones , author J. Leopold , \ and\ author I. Percival ,\ title title Ionisation of highly excited atoms by electric fields IV: Frequency and amplitude dependence for linearly polarized fields , \ @noop journal journal J.\ Phys.\ B \ volume 13 ,\ pages 31 ( yea...

    1980

  15. [23]

    Pohl , author D

    author author T. Pohl , author D. Vrinceanu , \ and\ author H. Sadeghpour ,\ title title Rydberg atom formation in ultracold plasmas: Small energy transfer with large consequences , \ @noop journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 223201 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.