Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Optimally time-dependent modes of vortex gust-airfoil interactions

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a vortex gust hitting an airfoil, the region where perturbations amplify most tracks the forming leading-edge vortex and then shifts to the wake; when the gust is strong, it rides on the shed vortex cores.

desk verdict A credible OTD application to a tough gust-airfoil problem; the main caveat is an unweighted L2 norm that may bias the 'most amplified region' toward fine-mesh regions. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02095 v1 pith:FDUJZ3ZK submitted 2025-01-03 physics.flu-dyn

Yonghong Zhong , Alireza Amiri-Margavi , Hessam Babaee , Kunihiko Taira This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords optimallytime-dependentmodesvortexgustairfoilinteractiontransientperturbationamplificationunsteadybaseflowleading-edgeNACA0012control
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks where and when small perturbations can grow most during a strong vortex-gust encounter with an airfoil, when the base flow itself is changing rapidly. Using optimally time-dependent (OTD) modes, it tracks the leading perturbation-amplification structures in four vortex-airfoil interactions with gust ratios $G = -1, -0.5, 0.5$, and $1$ at a $12^\circ$ angle of attack. The central finding is that the most amplified region is not stationary: it follows the forming leading-edge vortex, then shifts to the wake or to the cores of shed vortex pairs depending on gust strength and sign. This matters because it gives a time-resolved map of where the flow is most receptive to perturbations, which can indicate where and when to apply flow control on an unsteady wing.

What carries the argument

The engine is the OTD low-rank approximation $Q'(t) \approx U_r(t)Y_r(t)^T$, where $U_r$ holds time-dependent orthonormal modes and $Y_r$ holds their coefficients. The modes and coefficients evolve by projecting the instantaneous linearized Navier-Stokes operator $L(t)$ onto the subspace, $dU_r/dt = LU_r - U_r(U_r^T L U_r)$ and $dY_r^T/dt = (U_r^T L U_r)Y_r^T$, with the skew-symmetric gauge freedom set to zero. A rotation based on the singular value decomposition of the correlation matrix ranks the modes by singular value so that the first mode is the most amplified direction at each instant. The key diagnostic is the energy amplification $g_i(t) = \sigma_i^2(t)/\|q'_{0i}(t)\|^2$, giving the maximum factor by which a perturbation can grow by time $t$ relative to its initial amplitude.

What would settle it

Recompute the leading OTD mode and $g_1(t)$ for the $G=0.5$ case using a kinetic-energy or Chu norm instead of the conservative-state $L^2$ norm, and compare the time at which the amplification hotspot shifts from the leading-edge vortex sheet to the forming leading-edge vortex. If the hotspot location or transition time moves substantially, the structural conclusions depend on the choice of norm. Alternatively, in a forced simulation, inject perturbations only in the predicted OTD hotspot at each time; if that localized forcing does not produce the largest response relative to equal-energy forcing elsewhere, the OTD ranking is not predictive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The study reports that for a moderate positive vortex gust ($G=0.5$) the leading OTD mode first marks the leading-edge vortex sheet, then the core of the developing leading-edge vortex, and finally the wake behind the trailing edge, with higher-order modes adding a secondary sensitive region in the trailing-edge wake. For strong gusts ($G=\pm 1$) the dominant amplified structures coincide with the cores of the shed vortex pair, and the leading energy amplification $g_1$ grows roughly monotonically, indicating a persistent instability mechanism tied to high-vorticity shedding. For the moderate negative gust ($G=-0.5$) the leading mode evolves gradually with the deformed wake, while a secondary mode spikes in amplification when the pressure-side vortex sheet begins to roll up. The paper interprets these results as evidence that OTD analysis can expose the spatiotemporal receptivity of highly unsteady vortex-airfoil flows, including where and when perturbations are amplified relative to their initial amplitude.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that amplification should be measured by the Euclidean $L^2$ norm of the conservative state vector $[\rho, \rho u, \rho v, \rho w, e]$, so perturbations in density, momentum components, and total energy are combined with equal weight despite having different physical units; if a different physically motivated norm were used, the ranking of which regions are 'most amplified' and the growth values could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $G=0.5$, flow control should act at the leading edge while the gust approaches, then move to the trailing-edge wake once the leading-edge vortex detaches.
  • For strong gusts ($G=\pm 1$), actuators aimed at the cores of the shed vortex pair would target the region of maximum perturbation amplification.
  • Higher-order OTD modes reveal secondary receptive regions, such as the trailing-edge vortex sheet in the $G=0.5$ case and the pressure-side roll-up in the $G=-0.5$ case, so controlling only the leading mode may miss important dynamics.
  • The monotone growth of $g_1$ for strong gusts signals a persistent instability, whereas rises and falls for moderate gusts indicate transient instabilities that deposit energy into the wake.
  • The same OTD pipeline applies to other unsteady base flows, such as pitching airfoils or separated wakes, where time-invariant stability analysis is not valid.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quantitative amplification rankings are computed in the conservative-state $L^2$ norm; translating them into a kinetic-energy or Chu norm would likely change the $g_i$ values and could reorder subdominant modes, so the reported magnitudes should be read as norm-dependent.
  • The appendix finding that concentrated upstream perturbations on the vortex core amplify more than sparsely distributed ones for $G=\pm 1$ suggests a testable experiment: seed the flow with compact versus distributed perturbations of equal energy and compare their downstream amplification.
  • The same OTD machinery could be used to build a reduced-order observer for real-time gust-load prediction, since the subspace tracks the instantaneous danger directions rather than time-averaged ones.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies optimally time-dependent (OTD) mode decomposition to two-dimensional compressible DNS of a NACA 0012 airfoil at Re = 400, angle of attack 12°, and M = 0.1 interacting with a Taylor vortex of gust ratio G = -1, -0.5, 0.5, or 1. The unsteady vortex-airfoil flow is taken as the time-dependent base state, and OTD modes are evolved under the linearized Navier-Stokes operator extracted from the DNS. The leading OTD modes, singular values, and the quantities g_i are used to identify spatiotemporal regions of maximum perturbation amplification, with qualitative transitions reported (e.g., for G = 0.5 the most amplified region moves from the leading-edge vortex sheet to the forming leading-edge vortex and later to the wake). Appendix A provides convergence checks in time-step size, number of OTD modes, initial evolution time, and random initial conditions. Appendix B discusses the most amplified initial perturbations.

Significance. If the norm and definitional issues are resolved, the paper is a useful demonstration of OTD analysis for strongly unsteady aerodynamic gust encounters. The study has clear strengths: it uses standard OTD evolution equations, contains no fitted parameters, validates the DNS against previous lift data, and ships explicit convergence checks in Appendix A (temporal convergence, mode-number convergence, initial-time insensitivity, and random-initial-condition tests). It also makes falsifiable predictions about where perturbation growth is largest during vortex-airfoil interaction, which could guide time-varying flow-control experiments or simulations. The main caveat is that the quantitative amplification measure and, potentially, the spatial ranking of modes depend on the chosen inner product, which is not physically motivated or tested in the present manuscript.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2, Eqs. (2.19)-(2.21)] The definition of g_i is algebraically inconsistent. The first equality in Eq. (2.19) defines g_1 as the ratio of L2 norms, ||q'_*1||_2 / ||q'_01||_2, which equals sigma_1 / ||q'_01||_2 because ||u_1||_2 = 1. The second equality gives sigma_1^2 / ||q'_01||_2^2. These cannot both be true. If g_i is intended as an energy amplification (a ratio of squared norms), the first expression and the surrounding wording should be adjusted; if it is an amplitude ratio, the right-hand side is wrong. Since Figures 5-8 report g_i as 'energy amplifications', every quantitative growth statement in Section 4 depends on correcting this definition.
  2. [Section 3.1 and Section 2, Eq. (2.2)] The amplification measure is the unweighted Euclidean L2 norm of the conservative state vector [rho, rho u, rho v, rho w, e], and OTD orthonormality is imposed in this same inner product. This choice is load-bearing for the central spatial claim, for two reasons. First, the conservative variables mix different physical units, so without a nondimensionalization and a physical energy norm (e.g., a Chu or kinetic-energy norm) the dominant mode can be controlled by a particular component rather than by the physical perturbation energy. Second, the discrete Euclidean norm treats every grid point equally, while the CharLES mesh is unstructured with cell volumes varying by orders of magnitude near the airfoil and wake; a mode concentrated in a finely resolved region can have a large norm simply because it contains many degrees of freedom. The claimed transition of the most amplified region for G = 0.5, and the identification of vortex cores for G = ±1, could therefore be affected by mesh resolution rather than by intrinsic amplification physics. I request a sensitivity test: recompute the leading OTD modes and g_i with a volume-weighted L2 inner product, or with a nondimensionalized energy norm, and report whether the qualitative locations in Figures 5-8 persist.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4, first paragraph] The phrase 'the the case' should read 'the case'.
  2. [Appendix B, final paragraph] The sentence 'This suggests that a strong vortex-airfoil interaction' is incomplete and should be finished or rewritten.
  3. [Introduction and References] The Küssner reference is displayed as 'K ¥ussner' in the Introduction and 'K¨ussner' in the bibliography; the Rössler system is displayed as 'R¨ossler'. These encoding artifacts should be corrected.
  4. [Section 3.1] The statement that changing the OTD domain size 'does not affect the OTD modes and their coefficients' is asserted without a demonstration; either add a brief convergence check or soften the claim.
  5. [Section 2, Eq. (2.8)] The Frobenius norm is rendered with a nonstandard symbol in Eq. (2.8); the notation should be defined or replaced with a conventional \|\cdot\|_F.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the OTD modes and amplification factors are genuine outputs of the linearized dynamics, with no parameter fitted to the reported 'most amplified region' claims.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained: it defines OTD modes via the variational principle/Galerkin projection (Eqs. 2.8-2.14), evolves them with the time-varying linearized Navier-Stokes operator L(t) extracted from a DNS base flow, and reports the resulting singular values and modes as the analysis output. The initial OTD subspace is seeded from an SVD of DNS snapshots (Eq. 3.4), but Appendix A shows the leading mode is reproduced with random-noise and shifted-initial-time initializations, so the central spatial claim does not reduce to the initialization by construction. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to force a choice; the cited OTD theory (Babaee & Sapsis 2016; Babaee et al. 2017) is independent published mathematics and is also re-derived in Section 2. The unweighted Euclidean norm on conservative variables is a physical modeling choice that could affect mesh-dependence of the 'most amplified region,' but that is a correctness/robustness caveat, not a circular reduction. The only manuscript defect relevant to completeness is a truncated sentence in Appendix B ('This suggests that a strong vortex-airfoil interaction The normalized q'*_0...'), an editorial typo that does not affect the circularity verdict.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard OTD theory and the DNS base flow, plus several unstated modeling choices (norm, perturbation boundary conditions, domain truncation). No new physical entities or laws are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • number of OTD modes r = 15
    Chosen for convergence of leading singular values; r=5 already reproduces the top three modes. This is a user choice affecting the reduced-order subspace, not fitted to data.
  • initial condition window [tau_a, tau_b] = [-1, -0.4]
    Snapshots from this window initialize the OTD modes. The paper checks insensitivity to initial evolution time, but the window is a modeling input.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Linearized Navier-Stokes equations about the unsteady base flow describe the evolution of small perturbations (Eq. 2.2).
    Requires perturbation amplitude to be small; stated in Section 2 but not quantified against the actual gust strengths.
  • domain assumption The DNS base flow is an accurate solution of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations.
    Validated for lift coefficient and grid/time convergence in Section 3.1, but the vortex gust cases rely on the same solver without independent experimental confirmation.
  • ad hoc to paper The Euclidean L2 norm on conservative variables defines a meaningful amplification measure.
    Used in Eqs. (2.19)-(2.21) and for orthonormality of OTD modes. Mixes dimensions of density, momentum, and energy; no physical energy norm is justified.
  • domain assumption Dirichlet boundary conditions at the far-field and airfoil, and Neumann at the outlet, are appropriate for the perturbation linear operator.
    Stated in Section 3.1 but not discussed in terms of perturbation inflow/outflow or compatibility with the time-varying base flow.
  • standard math The OTD evolution equations (2.13)-(2.14) derived from the variational principle are correct.
    Identical to the established OTD formulation from Babaee & Sapsis (2016); the paper notes its variational route differs but yields the same equations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optimally time-dependent modes of vortex gust-airfoil interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FDUJZ3ZK

@misc{pith2026250102095,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optimally time-dependent modes of vortex gust-airfoil interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FDUJZ3ZK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02095}
}
abstract

We find the optimally time-dependent (OTD) orthogonal modes about a time-varying flow generated by a strong gust vortex impacting a NACA 0012 airfoil. This OTD analysis reveals the amplification characteristics of perturbations about the unsteady base flow and their amplified spatiotemporal structures that evolve over time. We consider four time-varying laminar base flows in which a vortex with a strength corresponding to the gust ratio $G$ of $\{-1,-0.5,0.5,1\}$ impinges on the leading edge of the airfoil at an angle of attack of $12^\circ$. In these cases, the impingement of the strong gust vortex causes massive separation and the generation of large-scale vortices around the airfoil within two convective time units. The highly unsteady nature of these vortex-airfoil interactions necessitates an advanced analytical technique capable of capturing the transient perturbation dynamics. For each of the considered gust ratios, the OTD analysis identifies the most amplified region to perturbations, the location of which changes as the wake evolves differently. For interactions between a moderate positive vortex gust ($G=0.5$) and the airfoil, the area where perturbations are amplified transitions from the leading-edge vortex sheet to the forming leading-edge vortex. Later, this most amplified structure becomes supported in the airfoil wake directly behind the trailing edge. In contrast, a strong vortex gust ($G=\pm 1$) encountered by the airfoil shows the most amplified OTD mode to appear around the core of the shed vortices. This study provides an analysis technique and fundamental insights into the broader family of unsteady aerodynamic problems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02095 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The evolution of the base flow q¯ (𝑡) and the optimally time-dependent modes u𝑖(𝑡) for an example of the Rossler system. The perturbation ¨ q ′ (𝑡) is captured by the product of optimally time-dependent modes u(𝑡) and their coefficients y(𝑡). decomposition of this correlation matrix C(𝑡) yields C(𝑡)R(𝑡) = R(𝑡)𝚲(𝑡), (2.15) where 𝚲(𝑡) ≡ diag(𝜆1 (𝑡), 𝜆2 (𝑡), ..., 𝜆r(𝑡)) holds the set of eigenvalues and R(𝑡) ∈ R 𝑟×𝑟 is … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Computational domains of DNS, linear operator, and OTD mode analysis for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Comparison of time-averaged lift coefficient between references and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Vorticity fields and aerodynamic forces disturbed by a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (𝑎) Vorticity fields of the time-varying base flow and the top three optimally time-dependent vorticity modes, (𝑏) the leading three singular values, and (𝑐) the leading three energy amplifications for 𝐺 = 0.5. amplified through the lens of the OTD modes. We present th…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (𝑎) Vorticity fields of the time-varying base flow and the top three optimally time-dependent vorticity modes, (𝑏) the leading three singular values, and (𝑐) the leading three energy amplifications for 𝐺 = 1. of energy concentration, coincides with the maximum amplific…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (𝑎) Vorticity fields of the time-varying base flow and the top three optimally time-dependent vorticity modes, (𝑏) the leading three singular values, and (𝑐) the leading three energy amplifications for 𝐺 = −0.5. negative gust does not lead to large vortex shedding upon…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (𝑎) Vorticity fields of the time-varying base flow and the top three optimally time-dependent vorticity modes, (𝑏) the leading three singular values, and (𝑐) the leading three energy amplifications for 𝐺 = −1. more sensitive to localized disturbances and transient phen…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Time convergence on the top three singular values of moderate negative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Convergence on the number of OTD modes for the top five singular values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Cosine similarity of each of the three dominant modes between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The influence of initial time for OTD evolution. For each of the leading three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The evolution of OTD modes with random noise as the initial condition, 𝐺 = 0.5. condition. The noise structures get smoothed out as time increases, and vortical structures similar to OTD mode 1 are observed near the airfoil. Compared to the initial modes, which are th…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Evolution of the leading singular value subject to different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Evolution of the leading singular value subject to different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year eprint label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    @esa (Ref

    \@ifclassloaded aguplus natbib The aguplus class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later remove the command natbib from the document \@ifclassloaded nlinproc natbib The nlinproc class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later r...

  4. [4]

    @stdbsttrue NAT@ctr \@lbibitem[ NAT@ctr ] \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 [ @natanchorstart #2\@extra@b@citeb \@biblabel @num @natanchorend] @ifcmd#1(@)(@)\@nil #2 @lbibitem\@undefined @lbibitem\@lbibitem \@lbibitem[#1]#2 @lb...

  5. [5]

    A cyclic perspective on transient gust encounters through the lens of persistent homology

    @open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifundefined NAT@sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifundefined bib@heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] @ \@biblabel NAT@ctr \@bibsetup #1 NAT@ctr 0 @openbib .11em \@plus.33em \@minus.07em 4000 4000 `\.=1000 \@...

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  6. [6]

    & Babaee, H

    Amiri-Margavi, A. & Babaee, H. 2024 Time-dependent low-rank input-output operator for forced linearized dynamics with unsteady base flows . J. Fluid Mech. 1001 , A22

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Atassi, H. M. 1984 The sears problem for a lifting airfoil revisited-new results . J. Fluid Mech. 141 , 109--122

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    , Holmes, P

    Aubry, N. , Holmes, P. , Lumley, J. L. & Stone, E. 1988 The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer . J. Fluid Mech. 192 , 115--173

    work page 1988

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    , Farazmand, M

    Babaee, H. , Farazmand, M. , Haller, G. & Sapsis, T. P 2017 Reduced-order description of transient instabilities and computation of finite-time L yapunov exponents . Chaos 27 (6)

    2017

  2. [10]

    & Sapsis, T

    Babaee, H. & Sapsis, T. P. 2016 A minimization principle for the description of modes associated with finite-time instabilities . Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 472 (2186), 20150779

    2016

  3. [11]

    , Biler, H

    Badrya, C. , Biler, H. , Jones, A. R. & Baeder, J. D. 2021 Effect of gust width on flat-plate response in large transverse gust . AIAA J. 59 (1), 49--64

    2021

  4. [12]

    , Duguet, Y

    Beneitez, M. , Duguet, Y. , Schlatter, P. & Henningson, D. S. 2023 Instability of the optimal edge trajectory in the blasius boundary layer . J. Fluid Mech. 971 , A42

    2023

  5. [13]

    Blackburn, H. M. , Barkley, D. & Sherwin, S. J. 2008 Convective instability and transient growth in flow over a backward-facing step . J. Fluid Mech. 603 , 271--304

    2008

  6. [14]

    & Sapsis, T

    Blanchard, A. & Sapsis, T. P. 2019 a\/ Analytical description of optimally time-dependent modes for reduced-order modeling of transient instabilities . SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 18 (2), 1143--1162

    2019

  7. [15]

    & Sapsis, T

    Blanchard, A. & Sapsis, T. P. 2019 b\/ Stabilization of unsteady flows by reduced-order control with optimally time-dependent modes . Phys. Rev. Fluids 4 (5), 053902

    2019

  8. [16]

    Bres, G. A. , Ham, F. , Nichols, J. & Lele, S. K. 2017 Unstructured large-eddy simulations of supersonic jets . AIAA J. 55 (4), 1164--1184

    2017

  9. [17]

    , Chiappini, D

    Di Ilio, G. , Chiappini, D. , Ubertini, S. , Bella, G. & Succi, S. 2018 Fluid flow around NACA 0012 airfoil at low-reynolds numbers with hybrid lattice boltzmann method . Comput. Fluids 166 , 200--208

    2018

  10. [18]

    Dickinson, M. H. & G \"o tz, K. G. 1993 Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low reynolds numbers . J. Exp. Biol. 174 (1), 45--64

    1993

  11. [19]

    , Carpenter, M

    Donello, M. , Carpenter, M. H & Babaee, H. 2022 Computing sensitivities in evolutionary systems: a real-time reduced order modeling strategy . SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 44 (1), A128--A149

    2022

  12. [20]

    Eldredge, J. D. & Jones, A. R. 2019 Leading-edge vortices: mechanics and modeling . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51 , 75--104

    2019

  13. [21]

    Farrell, B. F. & Ioannou, P. J. 1993 Stochastic forcing of the linearized navier--stokes equations . Phys. Fluids 5 (11), 2600--2609

    1993

  14. [22]

    & Taira, K

    Fukami, K. & Taira, K. 2023 Grasping extreme aerodynamics on a low-dimensional manifold . Nat. Commun 14 (1), 6480

    2023

  15. [23]

    , Blackburn, H

    G \'o mez, F. , Blackburn, H. M. , Rudman, M. , Sharma, A. S. & McKeon, B. J. 2016 A reduced-order model of three-dimensional unsteady flow in a cavity based on the resolvent operator . J. Fluid Mech. 798 , R2

    2016

  16. [24]

    Jones, A. R. 2020 Gust encounters of rigid wings: Taming the parameter space . Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 (11), 110513

    2020

  17. [25]

    Jones, A. R. , Cetiner, O. & Smith, M. J. 2022 Physics and modeling of large flow disturbances: Discrete gust encounters for modern air vehicles . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 54 (1), 469--493

    2022

  18. [26]

    Jovanovi \'c , M. R. & Bamieh, B. 2005 Componentwise energy amplification in channel flows . J. Fluid Mech. 534 , 145--183

    2005

  19. [27]

    & Sears, W

    von K \'a rm \'a n, T. & Sears, W. R. 1938 Airfoil theory for non-uniform motion . J. Aeronautical Sci. 5 (10), 379--390

    1938

  20. [28]

    , Hanifi, A

    Kern, J.S. , Hanifi, A. & Henningson, D.S. 2022 Subharmonic eigenvalue orbits in the spectrum of pulsating P oiseuille flow . J. Fluid Mech. 945 , A11

    2022

  21. [29]

    , Negi, P.S

    Kern, J.S. , Negi, P.S. , Hanifi, A. & Henningson, D.S. 2024 Onset of absolute instability on a pitching aerofoil . J. Fluid Mech. 988 , A8

    2024

  22. [30]

    , Ham, F

    Khalighi, Y. , Ham, F. , Moin, P. , Lele, S. K. & Schlinker, R. H. 2011 a\/ Noise prediction of pressure-mismatched jets using unstructured large eddy simulation. In Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air\/ , , vol. 54617 , pp. 381--387

    2011

  23. [31]

    , Ham, F

    Khalighi, Y. , Ham, F. , Nichols, J. , Lele, S. K. & Moin, P. 2011 b\/ Unstructured large eddy simulation for prediction of noise issued from turbulent jets in various configurations. In 17th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference (32nd AIAA aeroacoustics conference)\/ , p. 2886

    2011

  24. [32]

    & Lubich, C

    Koch, O. & Lubich, C. 2007 Dynamical low‐rank approximation . SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 29 (2), 434--454

    2007

  25. [33]

    Kurtulus, D. F. 2016 On the wake pattern of symmetric airfoils for different incidence angles at re= 1000 . Int. J. Micro Air Veh 8 (2), 109--139

    2016

  26. [34]

    u ssner, H. G. 1936 Zusammenfassender bericht \

    K \"u ssner, H. G. 1936 Zusammenfassender bericht \"u ber den instation \"a ren auftrieb von fl \"u geln . Luftfahrtforschung 13 , 410

    1936

  27. [35]

    , Sun, Y

    Liu, Q. , Sun, Y. , Yeh, C. A. , Ukeiley, L. S. , Cattafesta, L. N. & Taira, K. 2021 Unsteady control of supersonic turbulent cavity flow based on resolvent analysis . J. Fluid Mech. 925 , A5

    2021

  28. [36]

    Liu, Y. , Li, K. , Zhang, J. , Wang, H. & Liu, L. 2012 Numerical bifurcation analysis of static stall of airfoil and dynamic stall under unsteady perturbation . Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 17 (8), 3427--3434

    2012

  29. [37]

    1967 The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows

    Lumley, J. 1967 The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows . Atmospheric turbulence and radio wave propagation pp. 166--178

    1967

  30. [38]

    & Flores, O

    Mart \' nez-Muriel, C. & Flores, O. 2020 Analysis of vortical gust impact on airfoils at low reynolds number . J. Fluids Struct. 99 , 103138

    2020

  31. [39]

    McKeon, B. J. & Sharma, A. S. 2010 A critical-layer framework for turbulent pipe flow . J. Fluid Mech. 658 , 336--382

    2010

  32. [40]

    , Sharma, A

    Moarref, R. , Sharma, A. S. , Tropp, J. A. & McKeon, B. J. 2013 Model-based scaling of the streamwise energy density in high-reynolds-number turbulent channels 734 , 275--316

    2013

  33. [41]

    , Wang, Z

    Qian, Y. , Wang, Z. & Gursul, I. 2022 Interaction of quasi-two-dimensional vortical gusts with airfoils, unswept and swept wings . Exp. Fluids 63 (8), 124

    2022

  34. [42]

    , Nouri, A

    Ramezanian, D. , Nouri, A. G. & Babaee, H. 2021 On-the-fly reduced order modeling of passive and reactive species via time-dependent manifolds . Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 382 , 113882

    2021

  35. [43]

    1998 Vortex-body interactions

    Rockwell, D. 1998 Vortex-body interactions . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30 (1), 199--229

    1998

  36. [44]

    & Lermusiaux, P.F.J

    Sapsis, T.P. & Lermusiaux, P.F.J. 2009 Dynamically orthogonal field equations for continuous stochastic dynamical systems . Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 238 (23-24), 2347--2360

    2009

  37. [45]

    Schmid, P. J. 2007 Nonmodal stability theory . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39 , 129--162

    2007

  38. [46]

    Schmid, P. J. 2010 Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data . J. Fluid Mech. 656 , 5–28

    2010

  39. [47]

    Sears, W. R. 1941 Some aspects of non-stationary airfoil theory and its practical application . J. Aeronautical Sci. 8 (3), 104--108

    1941

  40. [48]

    , Taira, K

    Sun, Y. , Taira, K. , Cattafesta, L. N. & Ukeiley, L. S. 2017 Biglobal instabilities of compressible open-cavity flows . J. Fluid Mech. 826 , 270--301

    2017

  41. [49]

    , Brunton, S

    Taira, K. , Brunton, S. L , Dawson, S. , Rowley, C. W , Colonius, T. , McKeon, B. J , Schmidt, O. T , Gordeyev, S. , Theofilis, V. & Ukeiley, L. S 2017 Modal analysis of fluid flows: An overview . AIAA J. 55 (12), 4013--4041

    2017

  42. [50]

    , Hemati, M

    Taira, K. , Hemati, M. S , Brunton, S. L , Sun, Y. , Duraisamy, K. , Bagheri, S. , Dawson, S. & Yeh, C.-A. 2020 Modal analysis of fluid flows: Applications and outlook . AIAA J. 58 (3), 998--1022

    2020

  43. [51]

    Taylor, G. I. 1918 On the dissipation of eddies . Meteorology, Oceanography and Turbulent Flow pp. 96--101

    1918

  44. [52]

    2011 Global linear instability

    Theofilis, V. 2011 Global linear instability . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43 , 319--352

    2011

  45. [53]

    Trefethen, L. N. , Trefethen, A. E. , Reddy, S. C. & Driscoll, T. A. 1993 Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues . Science 261 (5121), 578--584

    1993

  46. [54]

    2023 Recent advances in feature extraction techniques for high-speed flowfields

    Unnikrishnan, S. 2023 Recent advances in feature extraction techniques for high-speed flowfields . Progress in Aerospace Sciences 140 , 100918

    2023

  47. [55]

    Yeh, C. A. & Taira, K. 2019 Resolvent-analysis-based design of airfoil separation control . J. Fluid Mech. 867 , 572–610

    2019

  48. [56]

    , Fukami, K

    Zhong, Y. , Fukami, K. , An, B. & Taira, K. 2023 Sparse sensor reconstruction of vortex-impinged airfoil wake with machine learning . Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 37 , 269--287

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.