Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Second order regularity for degenerate p-Laplace type equations with log-concave weights

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For weighted p-Laplace Neumann problems on convex domains, a log-concave weight guarantees the stress field |∇u|^{p−2}∇u lies in W^{1,2}(Ω;ϱ), with an explicit sharp estimate.

desk verdict A genuine extension of second-order regularity to degenerate log-concave weights, with the main theorem resting on a weight-independent Poincaré inequality that the authors cite but do not prove; worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02106 v2 pith:7VGVYJIS submitted 2025-01-03 math.AP math.FA

Carlo Alberto Antonini , Giulio Ciraolo , Francesco Pagliarin This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.FA MSC 35B6535D3035J2535J6235J7035J92
keywords degenerateellipticequationsNeumannproblemsboundaryregularitysecond-orderderivativesconvexdomainslog-concaveweightsp-LaplaceequationReillyidentity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that degeneracy in the weight does not destroy second-order regularity, provided the degeneracy is log-concave and the boundary condition is the natural zero-flux one. On any bounded convex domain, weak solutions to the weighted p-Laplace Neumann problem have their stress field $A(\nabla u)=|\nabla u|^{p-2}\nabla u$ in the weighted Sobolev space $W^{1,2}(\Omega;\varrho)$, with an $L^2(\varrho)$ estimate for $\nabla A(\nabla u)$ whose constant depends only on $n$ and $p$. This is new even in the linear case $p=2$, where it yields weighted $W^{2,2}$ regularity. The same mechanism gives local boundary regularity on unbounded convex domains, with a separate treatment for $p>2$ requiring weights of power type $\varrho=g^a$. An independent byproduct is a compactness theorem for weighted Sobolev spaces under log-concave weights.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a generalized Reilly identity for vector fields $V$ with $V\cdot\nu=0$ on $\partial\Omega$: $\int_\Omega \varrho^{-1}(\operatorname{div}(\varrho V))^2\,dx = \int_\Omega \varrho\,\operatorname{tr}((\nabla V)^2)\,dx + \int_{\partial\Omega}\varrho\,B(V_T,V_T)\,dH^{n-1} + \int_\Omega \varrho\,\nabla^2 h\,V\cdot V\,dx$. Log-concavity makes $h=-\log\varrho$ convex, so the Hessian term is nonnegative; convexity of $\Omega$ makes the boundary second-fundamental-form term nonnegative; and a matrix-ratio estimate gives $\operatorname{tr}((\nabla A_\varepsilon(\nabla u_\varepsilon))^2)\ge c(p)|\nabla A_\varepsilon(\nabla u_\varepsilon)|^2$. The proof then passes through three nested approximations (smooth convex domains, smooth log-concave weights, regularized stress fields $A_\varepsilon$), with the weighted Poincaré inequality providing uniform energy bounds at each stage.

What would settle it

Compute the best constant in the weighted Poincaré inequality (3.1) for the log-concave weight $\varrho(x)=e^{-1/x_n}$ on the unit cube $(0,1)^n$ and check whether it remains bounded by $C(p)\,d_\Omega^p$; the paper's proof of Lemma 5.1 and Theorem 1.1 requires that uniform bound. Equivalently, integrate the one-dimensional weighted Neumann problem with $\varrho=x_n^a$ and a singular $f\in L^2(\Omega;\varrho)$ of zero weighted mean; if the weighted Hessian integral diverges while the energy is finite, the theorem would be false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the weighted Neumann problem $-\operatorname{div}(\varrho\,|\nabla u|^{p-2}\nabla u)=\varrho f$ on a bounded convex domain $\Omega$, the paper proves that whenever $\varrho=e^{-h}$ is log-concave (possibly vanishing on $\partial\Omega$) and $f\in L^2(\Omega;\varrho)\cap L^{p'}(\Omega;\varrho)$ satisfies $\int_\Omega f\varrho\,dx=0$, every weak solution has the stress field $A(\nabla u)=|\nabla u|^{p-2}\nabla u$ in $W^{1,2}(\Omega;\varrho)$. The main quantitative statement is $\int_\Omega |\nabla A(\nabla u)|^2\varrho\,dx\le C_0(n,p)\int_\Omega f^2\varrho\,dx$, with the $L^2(\Omega;\varrho)$-norm of $A(\nabla u)$ controlled by $f^2$ and $|f|^{p'}$; the constant $C_0$ is sharp, reducing to the classical sharp constant $1$ for $p=2$, $\varrho=1$. For unbounded convex domains, local boundary regularity is proved for $1<p\le 2$, and for $p>2$ under the additional structural assumption $\varrho=g^a$ with $g$ concave.

Load-bearing premise

The global proof inherits the weighted Poincaré inequality (3.1) for log-concave weights on bounded convex domains from cited references, without proving it; if that inequality failed, the uniform energy estimate and the final control of $A(\nabla u)$ in $L^2(\Omega;\varrho)$ would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For bounded convex domains, every weak Neumann solution with data in $L^2(\Omega;\varrho)\cap L^{p'}(\Omega;\varrho)$ automatically has a weighted second-order derivative of the stress field, so no boundary smoothness beyond convexity is needed.
  • The constant in the gradient estimate is scale-invariant and, in the linear constant-weight case, recovers the optimal constant $1$ of the Neumann Poisson estimate.
  • For unbounded convex domains, the local boundary estimates give the same regularity up to the boundary for $1<p\le 2$, and for $p>2$ whenever $\varrho=g^a$.
  • The compactness result for $W^{1,p}(\Omega;\varrho)$ follows from the same weighted Poincaré inequality and gives a tool for studying degenerate quasilinear problems beyond the present equation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The dependence on the cited weighted Poincaré inequality suggests the global theorem should survive for any weight class for which that inequality holds with a uniform constant; log-concavity is one sufficient condition rather than the only one.
  • The restriction $\varrho=g^a$ in the $p>2$ local theorem is tied to a lower bound on the $\varrho$-mass of boundary rectangles; weights like $\exp(-1/x_n)$ violate that bound, indicating a genuine threshold for the local technique.
  • At $p=2$ the result can be read as a degenerate-mass version of classical Neumann $W^{2,2}$ theory, with the log-concave weight playing the role of an invariant density; this may be useful for quantitative error estimates in Fokker-Planck type problems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves global and local second-order regularity for weighted p-Laplace Neumann problems with log-concave weights on convex domains. The main result, Theorem 1.1, shows that for a bounded convex domain Ω and a weight ρ=e^{-h} with h convex, any weak solution with compatible f∈L²(Ω;ρ)∩L^{p'}(Ω;ρ) has A(∇u)=|∇u|^{p-2}∇u ∈ W^{1,2}(Ω;ρ), together with the quantitative bounds (1.15) and (1.16). Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 give local boundary versions in unbounded convex domains, with separate statements for 1<p≤2 and for p>2 under the additional structural assumption ρ=g^a. The proof combines approximation of the domain, weight, and operator with a weighted Reilly identity, weighted Poincaré inequalities, and a compactness theorem for weighted Sobolev spaces.

Significance. If the technical gaps identified below are closed, the results are a meaningful extension of the known second-order regularity theory for the p-Laplace stress field to weights that are allowed to degenerate at the boundary; the p=2 case is already presented as new. The paper has several strengths: the approximation scheme is systematic, the constants in the main bounds are explicit, the weighted Reilly identity is stated quantitatively, and the limitation for Dirichlet problems is discussed honestly. The two points that need attention are the status of the nonlinear-mean weighted Poincaré inequality (3.1) and the missing strong-convergence argument in the final approximation steps; both are standard but load-bearing.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eq. (3.1)] The weighted Poincaré inequality is stated as a known result from [23,18] in the nonstandard form with the nonlinear mean condition ∫|u|^{p-2}uρ=0 and for every p>1. This inequality is load-bearing: it is used in Lemma 5.1 for the energy estimate (5.2), in (3.4) for the final L² control (5.39), and in Theorem 3.2 for compactness. Please add a proof of (3.1) or a precise statement of the relevant theorem in [23,18]. The missing step is short: the constant c_u from Lemma 3.1 is the minimizer of c↦∫|u−c|^pρ, so ∫|u−c_u|^pρ ≤ ∫|u−(u)_{Ω;ρ}|^pρ, and the usual linear-mean Poincaré inequality gives (3.1).
  2. [§5, Step 3, around (5.43)] The displayed convergences give u_k⇀w weakly in W^{1,p} and u_k→w strongly in L^p_loc and a.e., but they do not imply A(∇u_k)→A(∇w) a.e., because a.e. convergence of u_k does not control ∇u_k. The identification W=A(∇w) therefore needs a separate argument. One should prove strong convergence of ∇u_k in L^p_loc by testing the difference of the equations for u_k and w with u_k−w and using the p-monotonicity of A together with f_k→f in L^{p'}; then A(∇u_k)→A(∇w) a.e. and the passage to the limit is justified.
  3. [§6, Step 3 of Theorem 1.2 and Step 2 of Theorem 1.3] The final approximation step asserts 'u_k→u in W^{1,p}(Ω_R∩B_{R0}(x0);ρ)' and uses it to pass to the limit in (6.32), but no proof is supplied. Without strong convergence, only weak convergence is available and the limsup of ∫|A(∇u_k)|²ρ is not controlled by the corresponding quantity for u. The same monotonicity argument as in the previous comment should be written in both local proofs, since the estimates (1.21) and (1.25) depend on this passage.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 1.1 and §2.2] There are several typographical slips, for example 'satifies' in Theorem 1.1 and the definition of η_ε in §2.2, which should read η_ε(x)=ε^{-n}η(x/ε) rather than x/εn; please correct them throughout.
  2. [Lemma 6.2] In the Moser iteration display following (6.10), the factor q_k/q_k appears to be a typo for q_k^{k/q_k} or an equivalent exponent; please correct the displayed formula.
  3. [Proof of Theorem 1.3, before (6.39)] The sentence 'After adding the quantity C1∫_σ ... to both sides' is followed by a display in which both sides are also divided by (1+C1); the text should state this division explicitly.
  4. [References] Reference [35] appears in the bibliography but does not seem to be cited in the body of the paper; please check whether it is used.
  5. [Theorem 1.3 and Lemma 3.6] Theorem 1.3 allows a=0 in assumption (1.23), whereas Lemma 3.6 and its proof assume a>0; if the case a=0 (ρ≡1) is intended, add a sentence explaining that the lower bound (3.32) is trivial in that case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main estimates are derived from the equation via Reilly-type identities and an external weighted Poincaré inequality; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The proof of Theorem 1.1 derives the global estimate from the equation itself: the weighted Reilly identity (Lemma 4.1 and Proposition 4.2) is proved in the paper, the approximation scheme is self-contained, and the final bounds (5.38)-(5.39) follow from the equation plus the weighted Poincaré inequality (3.1). Inequality (3.1) is cited from external works [23,18] and is not a reformulation of the theorem being proved; it is an independent, parameter-free ingredient. The paper also proves consequences such as Lemma 3.1 and the compactness theorem from that inequality rather than assuming the final regularity. Self-citations [1] and [2] appear only as literature context or for an auxiliary Dirichlet remark in Section 7; they do not supply the central estimates of Theorems 1.1-1.3. There are no fitted parameters, no data-dependent constants disguised as predictions, no ansatz smuggled in through the authors' prior work, and no renaming of a known result as a new derivation. The nonlinear mean condition in (3.1) is a possible verification concern about the cited external theorem, but that is a correctness/checking issue, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters and no new entities. Its main external inputs are the weighted Poincaré inequality for log-concave weights and boundary regularity theorems for degenerate operators. The only ad hoc structural hypothesis is the power-concave form of the weight for p>2, which is explicitly shown to be necessary for the chosen technique.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Weighted Poincaré inequality for log-concave weights on bounded convex domains (3.1), with constant depending only on p and diameter
    Cited from [23,18] and used in Lemma 5.1, Theorem 3.2 and (3.4) to derive energy estimates and the final L^2 bound for A(∇u). This is a strong external input: it must hold with a constant independent of the weight.
  • standard math C^{1,γ} boundary regularity for degenerate quasilinear equations with homogeneous Neumann condition ([36, Theorem 2])
    Used in Proposition 5.2 and Lemma 6.2 to ensure the approximating solutions are smooth enough to apply Reilly's identity and converge in C^1 locally.
  • standard math Prékopa's theorem on the log-concavity of integrals of log-concave functions (Theorem 2.4)
    Used in Proposition 2.3 to smooth the weight while keeping log-concavity; stated as [42, Theorem 6].
  • standard math Convex domains can be approximated from inside by smooth convex domains with Hausdorff convergence (used in (5.5))
    From [30, Corollary 6.3.10]; allows the passage from smooth domains to arbitrary convex domains.
  • domain assumption Structural assumption ϱ(x)=g(x)^a with g nonnegative concave and a≥0 (Theorem 1.3, (1.23))
    Needed for the annulus Poincaré inequality Lemma 3.6; not a consequence of log-concavity, as Remark 3.7 shows with ϱ=exp(-1/x_n).
  • domain assumption The weight ϱ admits a continuous extension to Ω̄ in Theorems 1.2 and 1.3
    Required for the extension Lemma 3.4 and the trace arguments; without it the local boundary proof does not run.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Second order regularity for degenerate p-Laplace type equations with log-concave weights." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7VGVYJIS

@misc{pith2026250102106,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Second order regularity for degenerate p-Laplace type equations with log-concave weights},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7VGVYJIS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02106}
}
read the original abstract

We consider weighted p-Laplace type equations with homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions in convex domains, where the weight is a log-concave function which may degenerate at the boundary. In the case of bounded domains, we provide sharp global second-order estimates. For unbounded domains, we prove local estimates at the boundary. The results are new even for the case p = 2.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02106 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Roughly speaking, the point x is closer to Graph F than Φm(x) is, so that inequality (3.17) follows by a continuity-convexity argument coupled with the Hausdorff convergence (3.10). Proof of Lemma 3.4. First observe that, owing to (3.10), we have that Φm(Ω \ Ωm) ⊂ Ωm for m large enough, and then the function ϱ ◦ Φm is well defined. Assume by contradiction that (3.17) is false. Then we may find a sequence {xm}m∈N ⊂ Ω… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Observe also that (3.29) diam Ri ≤ C(n) (1 + LF ) δ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Second-order boundary estimates for solutions to a class of quasilinear elliptic equations

    math.AP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For quasilinear equations -div(a(|∇u|)∇u)=f, the stress field a(|∇u|)^k∇u is shown to belong to W^{1,2}(Ω) up to the boundary for the optimal range of k, under weak W^{2,X} boundary regularity, with a convex-domain ve...

  2. An overview of regularity results for the Laplacian and $p$-Laplacian in metric spaces

    math.AP 2025-02 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of regularity estimates for the Laplacian and p-Laplacian on metric measure spaces, with a proof overview of the author's second-order regularity theorem in bounded RCD spaces.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Antonini, G

    C.A. Antonini, G. Ciraolo, A. Farina, Interior regularity results for inhomogeneous anisotropic quasilinear equations, Math. Ann. 387, 1745-1776 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Antonini, A

    C.A. Antonini, A. Cianchi, G. Ciraolo, A. Farina, V.G. Maz’ya, Global second order estimates in anisotropic elliptic problems, ArXiv preprint (2023) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.03052

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.03052 2023

  3. [3]

    Avelin, T

    B. Avelin, T. Kuusi, G. Mingione, Nonlinear Calder´ on-Zygmund theory in the limiting case, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 227 (2018), no. 2, 663-714

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    A. Kh. Balci, L. Diening, R. Giova, A. Passarelli di Napoli, Elliptic equations with degenerate weights , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 54 (2022), no. 2, 2373-2412

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    A. Kh. Balci, L. Diening, W. Markus, Higher order Calder´ on-Zygmund estimates for the p-Laplace equation, J. Differential Equations 268 (2020), no. 2, 590-635

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Baratta, B Sciunzi, D

    D. Baratta, B Sciunzi, D. Vuono, Third order estimates and the regularity of the Stress field for solutions to p-Laplace equations, ArXiv preprint (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Benatti, I

    L. Benatti, I. Y. Violo, Second order estimates for the p-Laplacian in RCD spaces , ArXiv preprint (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Bensoussan, J, Frehse, Regularity results for nonlinear elliptic systems and applications , Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol

    A. Bensoussan, J, Frehse, Regularity results for nonlinear elliptic systems and applications , Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 151, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2022), pp. xii+441

    work page 2022

Show all 50 references
  1. [9]

    Breit, A

    D. Breit, A. Cianchi, L. Diening, S. Schwarzacher, Global Schauder estimates for the p-Laplace system, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 243 (2022), no. 1, 201-255

    2022

  2. [10]

    Breit, A

    D. Breit, A. Cianchi, L. Diening, T. Kuusi, S. Schwarzacher, Pointwise Calder´ on-Zygmund gradient estimates for the p-Laplace system , J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 114 (2018), 146-190

    2018

  3. [11]

    Bogachev, Measure theory, Vol

    V.I. Bogachev, Measure theory, Vol. I, II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007. Vol. I: xviii+500 pp., Vol. II: xiv+575 SECOND ORDER REGULARITY FOR DEGENERATE ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS 32

    2007

  4. [12]

    Cianciaruso, L

    F. Cianciaruso, L. Muglia, B. Sciunzi, Second order boundary regularity for degenerate elliptic problems , preprint (2024), http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4750137

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Cianchi, Elliptic equations on manifolds and isoperimetric inequalities , Proc

    A. Cianchi, Elliptic equations on manifolds and isoperimetric inequalities , Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh 114 (1990), no. 3-4, 213-227

    1990

  6. [14]

    Cianchi, V.G

    A. Cianchi, V.G. Maz’ya, Second-order two-sided estimates in nonlinear elliptic problems, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 229 (2018), no. 2, 569-599

    2018

  7. [15]

    Cianchi, V.G

    A. Cianchi, V.G. Mazya, Quasilinear elliptic problems with general growth and merely integrable, or measure, data , Nonlinear Anal. 164 (2017), 189-215

    2017

  8. [16]

    Cianchi, V.G

    A. Cianchi, V.G. Maz’ya, Optimal second-order regularity for the p-Laplace system, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 132 (2019), 41-78

    2019

  9. [17]

    Damascelli, B

    L. Damascelli, B. Sciunzi, Regularity, monotonicity and symmetry of positive solutions of m-Laplace equations, J. Differential Equations 206 (2004), 483-515

    2004

  10. [18]

    Della Pietra, G

    F. Della Pietra, G. Nunzia, G. Piscitelli, A sharp weighted anisotropic Poincar´ e inequality for convex domains, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 355 (2017), no. 7, 748-752

    2017

  11. [19]

    Delfour, J.-P

    M.C. Delfour, J.-P. Zolesio, Shapes and geometries. Metrics, analysis, differential calculus, and optimization , Second edition, Advances in Design and Control, 22. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 2011. xxiv+622 pp

    2011

  12. [20]

    Dibenedetto, C 1+α local regularity of weak solutions of degenerate elliptic equations , Nonlinear Anal

    E. Dibenedetto, C 1+α local regularity of weak solutions of degenerate elliptic equations , Nonlinear Anal. 7 (1983), no. 8, 827-850

    1983

  13. [21]

    Diening, P

    L. Diening, P. Kaplick´ y, S. Schwarzacher, BMO estimates for the p-Laplacian , Nonlinear Anal. 75 (2012), no. 2, 637-650

    2012

  14. [22]

    Dr´ abek, A

    P. Dr´ abek, A. Kufner, F. Nicolosi, Quasilinear elliptic equations with degenerations and singularities , De Gruyter Series in Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 5. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1997. xii+219

    1997

  15. [23]

    Ferone, C

    V. Ferone, C. Nitsch, C. Trombetti, A remark on optimal weighted Poincar´ e inequalities for convex domains , Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. 23 (2012), no. 4, 467-475

    2012

  16. [24]

    Gilbarg, N

    D. Gilbarg, N. S. Trudinger, Elliptic partial differential equations of second order, Classics in Mathematics, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 2001, xiv+517

    2001

  17. [25]

    Giusti, Direct methods in the calculus of variations , World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 2003

    E. Giusti, Direct methods in the calculus of variations , World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc., River Edge, NJ, 2003. viii+403 pp

    2003

  18. [26]

    Grisvard, Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains , Monographs and Studies in Mathematics, 24

    P. Grisvard, Elliptic problems in nonsmooth domains , Monographs and Studies in Mathematics, 24. Pitman (Ad- vanced Publishing Program), Boston, MA, 1985. xiv+410 pp

    1985

  19. [27]

    Guarnotta, S

    U. Guarnotta, S. Mosconi, A general notion of uniform ellipticity and the regularity of the stress field for elliptic equations in divergence form , Anal. PDE 16 (2023), no. 8, 1955-1988

    2023

  20. [28]

    Henrot, M

    A. Henrot, M. Pierre, Shape variation and optimization. A geometrical analysis, Tracts in Mathematics, 28. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨ urich, 2018. xi+365 pp

    2018

  21. [29]

    Hewitt and K

    E. Hewitt and K. Stromberg, Real and Abstract Analysis, Springer Verlag, 1975

    1975

  22. [30]

    Kranz, H.R

    S.G. Kranz, H.R. Parks, The geometry of domains in space , Birkh¨ auser Advanced Texts, 1999. x+308 pp

    1999

  23. [31]

    Kufner, Weighted Sobolev spaces, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1985

    A. Kufner, Weighted Sobolev spaces, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1985. 116 pp

    1985

  24. [32]

    Kuusi, G

    T. Kuusi, G. Mingione, Linear potentials in nonlinear potential theory , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 207 (2013), no. 1, 215-246

    2013

  25. [33]

    O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, N. N. Ural’tseva, Linear and quasilinear elliptic equations, Academic Press, New York-London, 1968, xviii+495

    1968

  26. [34]

    Leoni, A first course in Sobolev spaces , Graduate Studies in Mathematics 181, Second Edition, American Math- ematical Society, Providence, RI, 2017, xxii+734

    G. Leoni, A first course in Sobolev spaces , Graduate Studies in Mathematics 181, Second Edition, American Math- ematical Society, Providence, RI, 2017, xxii+734

    2017

  27. [35]

    Lieberman, Regularized distance and applications, Pacific J

    G.M. Lieberman, Regularized distance and applications, Pacific J. Math. 117 (1985), no. 2, 329-352

    1985

  28. [36]

    G. M. Lieberman, Boundary regularity for solutions of degenerate elliptic equations , Nonlinear Anal. 12 (1988), no. 11, 1203-1219

    1988

  29. [37]

    G. M. Lieberman, Oblique derivative problems for elliptic equations , xvi+509 pp

  30. [38]

    Miao, Fa Peng, Y

    Q. Miao, Fa Peng, Y. Zhou, A global second-order Sobolev regularity for p-Laplacian type equations with variable coefficients in bounded domains , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 62 (2023), no. 7, Paper No. 191, 36 pp

    2023

  31. [39]

    Monticelli, S

    D.D. Monticelli, S. Rodney, R.L. Wheeden, Boundedness of weak solutions of degenerate quasilinear equations with rough coefficients, Differential Integral Equations 25 (2012), no. 1-2, 143-200

    2012

  32. [40]

    Monticelli, S

    D.D. Monticelli, S. Rodney, R.L. Wheeden, Harnack’s inequality and H¨ older continuity for weak solutions of degen- erate quasilinear equations with rough coefficients , Nonlinear Anal. 126 (2015), 69-114

    2015

  33. [41]

    Montoro, L

    L. Montoro, L. Muglia, B. Sciunzi, Optimal second-order boundary regularity for solutions to p-Laplace equations, Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, Volume 64, nr. 50, (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Pr´ ekopa,On logarithmic concave measures and functions , Acta Sci

    A. Pr´ ekopa,On logarithmic concave measures and functions , Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 34 (1973), 335-343

    1973

  35. [43]

    Pr´ ekopa,Logarithmic concave measures and related topics, Inst

    A. Pr´ ekopa,Logarithmic concave measures and related topics, Inst. Math. Appl. Conf. Ser., Academic Press, London- New York, 1980. SECOND ORDER REGULARITY FOR DEGENERATE ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS 33

    1980

  36. [44]

    Serrin, Local behavior of solutions of quasi-linear equations , Acta Math

    J. Serrin, Local behavior of solutions of quasi-linear equations , Acta Math. 111 (1964), 247-302

    1964

  37. [45]

    Y. Sire, S. Terracini, S. Vita, Liouville type theorems and regularity of solutions to degenerate or singular problems part I: even solutions , Comm. Partial Differential Equations 46 (2021), no. 2, 310-361

    2021

  38. [46]

    Y. Sire, S. Terracini, S. Vita, Liouville type theorems and regularity of solutions to degenerate or singular problems part II: odd solutions , Math. Eng. 3 (2021), no. 1, Paper No. 5, 50 pp

    2021

  39. [47]

    Stredulinsky, Weighted inequalities and degenerate elliptic partial differential equations , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1074

    E.W. Stredulinsky, Weighted inequalities and degenerate elliptic partial differential equations , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1074. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984. iv+143 pp

    1984

  40. [48]

    Terracini, G

    S. Terracini, G. Tortone, S. Vita, Higher order boundary Harnack principle via degenerate equations , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 248 (2024), no. 2, Paper No. 29, 44 pp

    2024

  41. [49]

    Tolksdorf, Regularity for a more general class of quasilinear elliptic equations , J

    P. Tolksdorf, Regularity for a more general class of quasilinear elliptic equations , J. Differential Equations 51 (1984), no. 1, 126-150

    1984

  42. [50]

    Ulisse Dini

    B.O. Turesson, Nonlinear potential theory and weighted Sobolev spaces , Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1736. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2000. xiv+173 pp. 1Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica “Ulisse Dini”, Universit `a di Firenze, Viale Morgagni 67/A, 50134 Firenze, Italy Em...

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.