Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

The puzzle of isolated and quenched dwarf galaxies in cosmic voids

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Isolated dwarf galaxies in cosmic voids can be quenched, with no neighbour within a megaparsec.

desk verdict Plausible first sample of quenched isolated dwarfs in voids, but the central star-formation criterion is aperture-limited and the NSC claim is oversold. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02910 v1 pith:4MRJEUXE submitted 2025-01-06 astro-ph.GA

Bahar Bidaran , Isabel Pérez , Laura Sánchez-Menguiano , María Argudo-Fernández , Anna Ferré-Mateu , Julio F. Navarro , Reynier F. Peletier , Tomás Ruiz-Lara
show 7 more authors
Glenn van de Ven Simon Verley Almudena Zurita Salvador Duarte Puertas Jesús Falcón-Barroso Patricia Sánchez-Blázquez Andoni Jiménez
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords dwarfgalaxiesgalaxyquenchingcosmicvoidsisolatedstarformationhistoriesnuclearclustersfullspectralfittinglarge-scalestructure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports what it identifies as the first sample of quenched dwarf galaxies in the least dense regions of the cosmic web: cosmic voids, filaments, and walls. The 17 galaxies in the sample have no neighbouring galaxy within 1.0 Mpc in projected distance and have not undergone significant star formation in the past 2 Gyr. Their stellar mass assembly histories resemble those of dwarf galaxies in the centres of galaxy clusters, which is unexpected because voids lack the environmental processes normally invoked to switch off star formation. The paper argues that this points to internal quenching mechanisms, such as feedback from in-situ star formation or black hole activity, as necessary additions to environmental explanations.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the cumulative mass fraction (CMF), the fraction of a galaxy's present-day stellar mass assembled by a given look-back time, built by a full spectral fitting routine that combines single stellar population models into a best-fitting spectrum and converts light-weighted coefficients to mass-weighted ones. A galaxy counts as quenched when its CMF shows $\tau_{90} > 2$ Gyr, meaning more than 90 percent of the current stellar mass was already in place more than 2 Gyr ago. The CMF is what lets the authors compare void dwarfs with cluster dwarfs, split the sample into short- and long-timescale star formation histories, and express the quenching claim quantitatively.

What would settle it

Take deep H-alpha or integral-field spectroscopy covering the full optical extent of these 17 galaxies; if any show H-alpha emission, blue stellar populations, or young clusters outside the fibre radius, they are not fully quenched, while null detections outside the fibre would confirm the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports a population of 17 dwarf galaxies with stellar masses in the range $8.9 < \log(M_\star/M_\odot) < 9.5$ that are simultaneously isolated and quenched. Each has no neighbour within 1.0 Mpc in projected distance, and each has assembled more than 90 percent of its present-day stellar mass more than 2 Gyr ago, with no significant recent star formation. Full spectral fitting of their central 3-arcsecond fibre spectra shows they are gas-poor, and their cumulative mass assembly profiles closely match those of dwarf galaxies in the inner regions of the Fornax cluster. The paper also finds, from r-band DECaLS images, that all 17 galaxies host a central nuclear star cluster. It concludes that environmental quenching cannot be the sole pathway for low-mass galaxies and suggests internal processes, possibly connected to nuclear star cluster formation, as alternative or additional mechanisms.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the small central patch sampled by the 3-arcsecond fibre represents the whole galaxy's recent star formation, so star formation continuing in the unobserved outer regions would weaken the quenched classification.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The prior conclusion that quenched dwarf galaxies below $\log(M_\star/M_\odot) \approx 9.0$ do not exist in isolation is violated at least in the $8.9$-$9.5$ mass range.
  • Gas removal by ram-pressure stripping or tides cannot be the only route to quiescence for low-mass galaxies, since these dwarfs sit in regions where such processes are absent.
  • The resemblance between void-dwarf and cluster-core mass assembly implies that early, rapid star formation can set the eventual quenched state independently of a galaxy's later environment.
  • The presence of a nuclear star cluster in every sample galaxy points to a link between central starbursts or merger-driven nucleation and quenching, even though the paper notes that not all nuclear star cluster hosts are quenched.
  • Cosmological simulations of dwarf galaxies now have a sparse-environment population to reproduce, which should sharpen models of supernova, stellar-wind, and black hole feedback in low-mass halos.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the authors leave implicit is that the true abundance of isolated quenched dwarfs is probably higher than 17, because the survey magnitude limit truncates the sample at $\log(M_\star/M_\odot) = 8.9$ and the fibre observes only the central regions.
  • If the fibre misses ongoing star formation in outer discs, the population would still be real but would need to be reclassified as centrally quenched; integral-field observations covering the full galaxy would test this directly.
  • The short- and long-timescale split predicts two distinct formation channels: early rapid assembly that quenches before 12.5 Gyr ago, versus later central starbursts or mergers that build the nucleus and quench earlier than non-nucleated cluster-outskirt dwarfs.
  • A practical selection strategy follows from the result: searching for nucleated red-sequence dwarf galaxies in void catalogues could yield larger samples for studying internal quenching.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of a sample of 17 isolated dwarf galaxies (8.9 < log(M*/Msun) < 9.5) in cosmic voids and filaments that appear to be quenched, based on SDSS DR7 spectroscopy. The selection combines red-sequence color, absence of bright neighbors within 1 Mpc and 500 km/s, EW(Halpha) < 3 Å, and full spectral fitting with pyPipe3D to require that more than 90% of the stellar mass formed more than 2 Gyr ago (tau90 > 2 Gyr). The paper also claims that all sample galaxies host nuclear star clusters, based on residual analysis of DECaLS r-band images, and that their stellar mass assembly resembles that of cluster dwarf galaxies, suggesting internal quenching mechanisms. The authors interpret the finding as challenging the view that dwarf-galaxy quenching requires environmental drivers.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper would be the first systematic detection of quenched, isolated dwarf galaxies in voids and would strengthen the case that internal feedback processes can quench low-mass galaxies without environmental assistance. The paper is transparent in its selection and uses public tools: pyPipe3D with 50 Monte Carlo iterations, a STECKMAP cross-check for one galaxy, and public catalogs for environment and stellar masses. The main scientific value is in the falsifiable sample and the comparison with cluster dwarfs. However, the strength of the headline claims currently exceeds what the aperture-limited spectroscopy and unresolved imaging can support, so the result is better described as indicative than definitive.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 4.2] The unqualified abstract claim that these dwarfs "have experienced no significant star formation in the past 2 Gyr" is stronger than the evidence presented. The star formation histories are derived from the central 3-arcsec SDSS fibre, which at z = 0.01-0.05 covers only 0.3-1.6 kpc, while the galaxies have effective radii of roughly 1-2 kpc (Fig. 2). Section 4.2 explicitly concedes that "it is also difficult to definitively evaluate the presence or absence of star formation in the unobserved outer regions beyond SDSS fibre coverage." Because the existence of fully quenched isolated dwarfs is the central claim of the paper, this aperture mismatch is load-bearing. Please either restrict the claim to central quenching, in the abstract as well as in the text, or provide quantitative extra-nuclear evidence such as NUV or Halpha imaging that the outer regions are also quiescent.
  2. [Abstract, Section 4.2, and Appendix C] The claim that all sample galaxies "host a central Nuclear Star Cluster (NSC)" is not supported at the stated resolution. Appendix C notes that NSCs subtend only 0.012-0.092 arcsec at these distances, far below the DECaLS PSF FWHM of 1.18 arcsec. The unsharp-masking and ellipse-subtraction analysis demonstrates a central light excess, but that is not a resolved NSC. The abstract's phrasing overstates the detection. Please rephrase to "nucleated" or "central nuclear excess" unless higher-resolution imaging is available to confirm individual NSC candidates.
  3. [Throughout] The paper reports "the first detection of a sample" but never provides a table listing the 17 galaxies. Without a table of coordinates, redshifts, stellar masses, EW(Halpha), tau90 values, isolation metrics, and void/filament membership, the central detection claim cannot be independently checked or followed up. Please add such a table, either in the main text or as an online appendix.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase "in the least dense regions of the cosmic web, including voids, filaments, and walls" is imprecise: filaments and walls are not the least dense regions of the cosmic web. Please reword to distinguish voids from filaments/walls.
  2. [Abstract] The word "gas-deprived" is used in the abstract, but the analysis only probes ionized gas through the absence of emission lines; no total gas content (e.g., HI) measurement is presented. Consider replacing with "with no significant ionized-gas emission" or explicitly stating the limitation.
  3. [Section 2] The isolation criterion relies on the NASA-Sloan Atlas, which is magnitude-limited and may miss very low-luminosity companions; this is a standard limitation but should be stated explicitly near the isolation definition.
  4. [Figure 1 caption] The caption says "which is the criteria we adopted"; it should be "which is the criterion we adopted." There are also several spacing artifacts (e.g., "di fferent", "o ffer") that should be corrected in the production version.
  5. [Section 4.2] The statement that NSCs "contribute between 10% and 50% of the total light observed within the 3-arcsecond SDSS fibre aperture" is illustrative but potentially misleading because the observations cannot separate the NSC from its immediate surroundings; please clarify that this contribution is an order-of-magnitude estimate for unresolved nuclear light.
  6. [Section 5.2] The comparison with Virgo and Fornax cluster dwarfs rests on very small numbers (e.g., five Virgo NSC hosts and five Fornax outskirts dwarfs). Please state this small-sample caveat where the NSC-quenching connection is discussed.
  7. [Figure 2 caption] The "zone of avoidance" region is shown in the figure but not defined in the caption; please add a brief explanation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation in the existence claim: the sample is selected via standard color, Hα, and τ90 criteria; only an interpretive ST/LT bimodality imports a threshold from prior overlapping-author work.

  1. other [Section 4.1 and Appendix B; Fig. 1 caption]
    "we split these galaxies into two sub-samples based on the cumulative stellar mass they formed by 12.5 Gyr, following Domínguez-Gómez et al. (2023) classification approach ... The 21.4% threshold corresponds to a point where the distribution of total stellar mass formed in galaxies 12.5 Gyr ago shows bimodality across different large-scale environments."

    The ST/LT classification and the subsequent claim of 'a clear bimodality in the τ50 and τ90' (Sec. 5.2) adopt a threshold from the authors' own previous paper (Domínguez-Gómez et al. 2023, with overlapping authorship) and then use that same split to support the bimodality interpretation. This makes the two-group narrative partly inherited rather than independently established here. It is not, however, load-bearing for the primary claim that isolated quenched dwarfs exist in voids, which rests on the independently applied τ90>2 Gyr and EW(Hα)<3 Å criteria.

full rationale

The paper is an observational classification study, not a model-derived prediction. The central existence claim is built from public SDSS/MPA-JHU and DECaLS data through standard selection steps: stellar-mass cut, red-sequence color cut, isolation cut, EW(Hα)<3 Å cut, and full spectral fitting with pyPipe3D to impose τ90>2 Gyr. The quenching timescale is a measured output of the spectral fit, not a parameter fitted to the quantity being predicted, so the 'no significant star formation in the past 2 Gyr' statement is an operational restatement of the τ90 criterion rather than a circular derivation. The comparison CMFs from Fornax and Virgo are external observational data, not outputs of this paper's fits. The ST/LT split and claimed bimodality do import a classification threshold from Domínguez-Gómez et al. (2023), which shares authors with this paper, but this sub-classification is interpretive and not required for the existence claim. The aperture limitation acknowledged in Sec. 4.2 (inability to evaluate outer-region star formation beyond the 3 arcsec SDSS fibre) is a measurement caveat that affects confidence in the 'fully quenched' wording, but it is not circularity. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not depend on a fitted physical model. It depends on a chain of standard selection thresholds (isolation distance, velocity window, H-alpha cut, tau90 criterion) and on external catalogue assumptions (NSA completeness, MPA-JHU masses, Pan void catalogue). These are listed as free parameters because they are hand-set, not because they were tuned to produce the result.

free parameters (6)
  • Isolation projected radius = 1.0 Mpc
    Chosen threshold in Section 2; defines 'isolated'. Standard in the field but hand-set.
  • Isolation velocity window = 500 km/s
    Used with the projected radius to exclude neighbours; affects isolation classification.
  • Neighbour luminosity limit = M_r ~ -17 mag
    Only neighbours brighter than this are counted; fainter companions are ignored.
  • H-alpha equivalent width threshold = 3 Angstrom
    Cid Fernandes et al. (2011) criterion used to remove star-forming and AGN galaxies.
  • Quenched threshold tau90 = 2 Gyr
    Defines quenched in Section 3; the claim of no star formation in the past 2 Gyr is tied to this definition.
  • Signal-to-noise cut = S/N > 12
    Quality cut applied after fitting in Section 3; removed five candidates.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption SDSS fibre spectrum (3 arcsec, central 0.3-1.6 kpc) is a valid proxy for the galaxy's overall star formation history.
    Invoked in Sections 2 and 3; the central claim 'quenched' relies on this. Paper acknowledges uncertainty for outer regions in Section 4.2.
  • domain assumption The NSA catalogue is complete enough to certify that no neighbour brighter than M_r ~ -17 mag exists within 1 Mpc and 500 km/s.
    Isolation criteria in Section 2; incompleteness or missed low-mass companions would weaken 'isolated'.
  • domain assumption MPA-JHU stellar masses from SDSS photometry are reliable for dwarfs in the mass range 8.9 < log(M*/Msun) < 9.5.
    Used to define the dwarf sample in Section 2; systematic photometric mass errors could alter sample membership.
  • domain assumption The Pan et al. (2012) void catalogue correctly identifies void membership for the selected galaxies.
    Sample selection in Section 2; void definition from a prior catalogue is taken as ground truth.
  • domain assumption The tau90 > 2 Gyr criterion from the literature is a valid definition of quenched for dwarf galaxies.
    Section 3; the headline 'no significant star formation in the past 2 Gyr' is set by this threshold rather than independently measured.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The puzzle of isolated and quenched dwarf galaxies in cosmic voids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4MRJEUXE

@misc{pith2026250102910,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The puzzle of isolated and quenched dwarf galaxies in cosmic voids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4MRJEUXE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02910}
}
abstract

We report, for the first time, the detection of a sample of quenched and isolated dwarf galaxies (with 8.9 $<$ log(M$_{\rm \star}$/M$_{\rm \odot}$) $<$ 9.5) in the least dense regions of the cosmic web, including voids, filaments, and walls. These dwarfs have no neighbouring galaxy within 1.0~Mpc in projected distance. Based on the full spectral fitting of their central spectra using Sloan Digital Sky Survey data, these galaxies are gas-deprived, exhibit stellar mass assembly very similar to dwarfs in the central regions of galaxy clusters, and have experienced no significant star formation in the past 2 Gyr. Additionally, analysis of r-band images from the Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey showed that these dwarf galaxies host a central Nuclear Star Cluster (NSC). Detecting quenched, isolated dwarf galaxies in cosmic voids indicates that environmental factors are not the sole drivers of their quenching. Internal mechanisms, such as feedback from in-situ star formation, also contributing to the NSC formation, black holes, or variations in conditions during their formation, offer potential explanations for star formation suppression in these galaxies. These findings highlight the need for a significant revision in our understanding of baryonic physics, particularly concerning the formation and evolution of low-mass galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02910 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The mass assembly history of dwarf galaxies as a function of look back time. Horizontal dashed lines from bottom to top in all panels represent the 50% and 90% cumulative stellar mass fractions, respectively. Panel A: The brown shaded area highlights the last 2 Gyr. The vertical solid line in this panel marks the τ21.4 = 12.5 Gyr, which is the criteria we adopted to classify galaxies into short- and long-timescale s… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The mass-size relation of early-type galaxies. Massive early-type galaxies (shown in gray circles, Janz et al. 2016), compact early-type galaxies (shown in gray plus symbols, Ferré-Mateu et al. 2021), and dwarf early-type galaxies in the Virgo cluster (shown in tan coloured symbols, Lisker et al. 2006) are compared with the sample of isolated and quenched dwarfs (shown as symbols colour-coded similar to [PITH_FULL_… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Environmental Quenching Mechanisms of Field Dwarf Galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In TNG50, all quenched field dwarf galaxies are environmental casualties, split between backsplash from massive hosts and cosmic-web stripping in filaments.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Alpaslan , M., Robotham , A. S. G., Obreschkow , D., et al. 2014, , 440, L106

    2014

  2. [2]

    2016, , 826, L27

    Annibali , F., Nipoti , C., Ciotti , L., et al. 2016, , 826, L27

    2016

  3. [3]

    2015, , 578, A110

    Argudo-Fern \'a ndez , M., Verley , S., Bergond , G., et al. 2015, , 578, A110

    2015

  4. [4]

    Arjona-G \'a lvez , E., Di Cintio , A., & Grand , R. J. J. 2024, , 690, A286

    2024

  5. [5]

    A., Phillips , M

    Baldwin , J. A., Phillips , M. M., & Terlevich , R. 1981, , 93, 5

    1981

  6. [6]

    2016, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Beygu , B., Kreckel , K., van der Hulst , T., et al. 2016, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 308, The Zeldovich Universe: Genesis and Growth of the Cosmic Web, ed. R. van de Weygaert , S. Shandarin , E. Saar , & J. Einasto , 600--605

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    2022, , 515, 4622

    Bidaran , B., La Barbera , F., Pasquali , A., et al. 2022, , 515, 4622

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Binggeli , B., Sandage , A., & Tammann , G. A. 1985, , 90, 1681

    work page 1985

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    D., Burleigh , K., Dey , A., et al

    Blum , R. D., Burleigh , K., Dey , A., et al. 2016, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 228, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#228, 317.01

    2016

  2. [10]

    2022, , 30, 3

    Boselli , A., Fossati , M., & Sun , M. 2022, , 30, 3

    2022

  3. [11]

    & Gavazzi , G

    Boselli , A. & Gavazzi , G. 2006, , 118, 517

    2006

  4. [12]

    & Gavazzi , G

    Boselli , A. & Gavazzi , G. 2014, , 22, 74

    2014

  5. [13]

    2024, astropy/photutils: 1.13.0

    Bradley, L., Sip o cz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2024, astropy/photutils: 1.13.0

    2024

  6. [14]

    Brinchmann , J., Charlot , S., White , S. D. M., et al. 2004, , 351, 1151

    2004

  7. [15]

    & Charlot , S

    Bruzual , G. & Charlot , S. 2003, , 344, 1000

    2003

  8. [16]

    2010, , 403, L16

    Cantalupo , S. 2010, , 403, L16

    2010

  9. [17]

    & Einasto , M

    Caon , N. & Einasto , M. 1995, , 273, 913

    1995

  10. [18]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245

    1989

  11. [19]

    Cautun , M., van de Weygaert , R., Jones , B. J. T., & Frenk , C. S. 2014, , 441, 2923

    2014

  12. [20]

    J., Peletier , R

    Cenarro , A. J., Peletier , R. F., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., et al. 2007, , 374, 664

    2007

  13. [21]

    & Zolotukhin , I

    Chilingarian , I. & Zolotukhin , I. 2015, Science, 348, 418

    2015

  14. [22]

    2011, , 413, 1687

    Cid Fernandes , R., Stasi \'n ska , G., Mateus , A., & Vale Asari , N. 2011, , 413, 1687

    2011

  15. [23]

    de los Reyes , M. A. C., Kirby , E. N., Zhuang , Z., et al. 2023, , 951, 52

    2023

  16. [24]

    J., Lang , D., et al

    Dey , A., Schlegel , D. J., Lang , D., et al. 2019, , 157, 168

    2019

  17. [25]

    M., Starkenburg , T

    Dickey , C. M., Starkenburg , T. K., Geha , M., et al. 2021, , 915, 53

    2021

  18. [26]

    2023, , 619, 269

    Dom \' nguez-G \'o mez , J., P \'e rez , I., Ruiz-Lara , T., et al. 2023, , 619, 269

    2023

  19. [27]

    1980, , 236, 351

    Dressler , A. 1980, , 236, 351

    1980

  20. [28]

    H., Taylor , M

    Eigenthaler , P., Puzia , T. H., Taylor , M. A., et al. 2018, , 855, 142

    2018

  21. [29]

    2016, , 826, 148

    Emerick , A., Mac Low , M.-M., Grcevich , J., & Gatto , A. 2016, , 826, 148

    2016

  22. [30]

    2022, , 658, A172

    Fahrion , K., Leaman , R., Lyubenova , M., & van de Ven , G. 2022, , 658, A172

    2022

  23. [31]

    2021, , 650, A137

    Fahrion , K., Lyubenova , M., van de Ven , G., et al. 2021, , 650, A137

    2021

  24. [32]

    2011, , 532, A95

    Falc \'o n-Barroso , J., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Vazdekis , A., et al. 2011, , 532, A95

    2011

  25. [33]

    A., et al

    Ferr \'e -Mateu , A., Alabi , A., Forbes , D. A., et al. 2018, , 479, 4891

    2018

  26. [34]

    A., et al

    Ferr \'e -Mateu , A., Durr \'e , M., Forbes , D. A., et al. 2021, , 503, 5455

    2021

  27. [35]

    S., Forbes , D

    Ferr \'e -Mateu , A., Gannon , J. S., Forbes , D. A., et al. 2023, , 526, 4735

    2023

  28. [36]

    M., Hunt, L., et al

    Geda, R., Crawford, S. M., Hunt, L., et al. 2022, The Astronomical Journal, 163, 202

    2022

  29. [37]

    R., Yan , R., & Tinker , J

    Geha , M., Blanton , M. R., Yan , R., & Tinker , J. L. 2012, , 757, 85

    2012

  30. [38]

    M., Cid Fernandes , R., P \'e rez , E., et al

    Gonz \'a lez Delgado , R. M., Cid Fernandes , R., P \'e rez , E., et al. 2016, , 590, A44

    2016

  31. [39]

    I., Read , J

    Gray , E. I., Read , J. I., Taylor , E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.19286

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    2023, , 526, 4024

    Gr \`e bol-Tom \`a s , P., Ferr \'e -Mateu , A., & Dom \' nguez-S \'a nchez , H. 2023, , 526, 4024

    2023

  33. [41]

    P., Pereira , M

    Haines , C. P., Pereira , M. J., Smith , G. P., et al. 2015, , 806, 101

    2015

  34. [42]

    A., Forbes , D

    Janz , J., Norris , M. A., Forbes , D. A., et al. 2016, , 456, 617

    2016

  35. [43]

    J., Graham , A

    Janz , J., Penny , S. J., Graham , A. W., Forbes , D. A., & Davies , R. L. 2017, , 468, 2850

    2017

  36. [44]

    A., et al

    Kreckel , K., Platen , E., Arag \'o n-Calvo , M. A., et al. 2011, , 141, 4

    2011

  37. [45]

    & van de Weygaert , R

    Kugel , R. & van de Weygaert , R. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.16489

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Lacerda , E. A. D., S \'a nchez , S. F., Mej \' a-Narv \'a ez , A., et al. 2022, , 97, 101895

    2022

  39. [47]

    Larson , R. B. 1974, , 169, 229

    1974

  40. [48]

    2002, , 334, 673

    Lewis , I., Balogh , M., De Propris , R., et al. 2002, , 334, 673

    2002

  41. [49]

    K., & Binggeli , B

    Lisker , T., Grebel , E. K., & Binggeli , B. 2006, , 132, 497

    2006

  42. [50]

    & Dom \' nguez S \'a nchez , H

    Mezcua , M. & Dom \' nguez S \'a nchez , H. 2024, , 528, 5252

    2024

  43. [51]

    2020, , 28, 4

    Neumayer , N., Seth , A., & B \"o ker , T. 2020, , 28, 4

    2020

  44. [52]

    2006, , 365, 46

    Ocvirk , P., Pichon , C., Lan c on , A., & Thi \'e baut , E. 2006, , 365, 46

    2006

  45. [53]

    C., Vogeley , M

    Pan , D. C., Vogeley , M. S., Hoyle , F., Choi , Y.-Y., & Park , C. 2012, , 421, 926

    2012

  46. [54]

    Peebles , P. J. E. 2001, , 557, 495

    2001

  47. [55]

    J., Masters , K

    Penny , S. J., Masters , K. L., Smethurst , R., et al. 2018, , 476, 979

    2018

  48. [56]

    2024, , 689, A213

    P \'e rez , I., Verley , S., S \'a nchez-Menguiano , L., et al. 2024, , 689, A213

    2024

  49. [57]

    2004, , 612, 168

    Pietrinferni , A., Cassisi , S., Salaris , M., & Castelli , F. 2004, , 612, 168

    2004

  50. [58]

    2019, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

    Rhee , J., Smith , R., Choi , H., et al. 2019, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 233, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#233, 206.01

    2019

  51. [59]

    2017, , 846, L4

    Ricciardelli , E., Cava , A., Varela , J., & Tamone , A. 2017, , 846, L4

    2017

  52. [60]

    Romero-G \'o mez , J., Aguerri , J. A. L., Peletier , R. F., et al. 2024, , 527, 9715

    2024

  53. [61]

    V., Navarro , J

    Sales , L. V., Navarro , J. F., Pe \ n afiel , L., et al. 2020, , 494, 1848

    2020

  54. [62]

    F., P \'e rez , E., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., et al

    S \'a nchez , S. F., P \'e rez , E., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., et al. 2016 a , , 52, 171

    2016

  55. [63]

    F., P \'e rez , E., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., et al

    S \'a nchez , S. F., P \'e rez , E., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., et al. 2016 b , , 52, 21

    2016

  56. [64]

    K., P \'e rez , I., & Peletier , R

    S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Ocvirk , P., Gibson , B. K., P \'e rez , I., & Peletier , R. F. 2011, , 415, 709

    2011

  57. [65]

    F., Jim \'e nez-Vicente , J., et al

    S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Peletier , R. F., Jim \'e nez-Vicente , J., et al. 2006, , 371, 703

    2006

  58. [66]

    H., Ferrarese , L., et al

    S \'a nchez-Janssen , R., Puzia , T. H., Ferrarese , L., et al. 2019, , 486, L1

    2019

  59. [67]

    S., Brooks , A

    Sharma , R. S., Brooks , A. M., Tremmel , M., Bellovary , J., & Quinn , T. R. 2023, , 957, 16

    2023

  60. [68]

    Sheth , R. K. & Tormen , G. 2004, , 350, 1385

    2004

  61. [69]

    J., Lucey , J

    Smith , R. J., Lucey , J. R., Price , J., Hudson , M. J., & Phillipps , S. 2012, , 419, 3167

    2012

  62. [70]

    S., Dalcanton , J

    Stinson , G. S., Dalcanton , J. J., Quinn , T., Kaufmann , T., & Wadsley , J. 2007, , 667, 170

    2007

  63. [71]

    A., Weinberg , D

    Strauss , M. A., Weinberg , D. H., Lupton , R. H., et al. 2002, , 124, 1810

    2002

  64. [72]

    A., et al

    Tojeiro , R., Eardley , E., Peacock , J. A., et al. 2017, , 470, 3720

    2017

  65. [73]

    A., Heckman , T

    Tremonti , C. A., Heckman , T. M., Kauffmann , G., et al. 2004, , 613, 898

    2004

  66. [74]

    R., Sun , M., Zeimann , G

    Trump , J. R., Sun , M., Zeimann , G. R., et al. 2015, , 811, 26

    2015

  67. [75]

    2008, , 389, 1111

    Valcke , S., de Rijcke , S., & Dejonghe , H. 2008, , 389, 1111

    2008

  68. [76]

    & Platen , E

    van de Weygaert , R. & Platen , E. 2011, in International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series, Vol. 1, International Journal of Modern Physics Conference Series, 41--66

    2011

  69. [77]

    C., Aquino , D., Yang , X., et al

    van den Bosch , F. C., Aquino , D., Yang , X., et al. 2008, , 387, 79

    2008

  70. [78]

    F., & Beckman , J

    Vazdekis , A., Casuso , E., Peletier , R. F., & Beckman , J. E. 1996, , 106, 307

    1996

  71. [79]

    2015, , 449, 1177

    Vazdekis , A., Coelho , P., Cassisi , S., et al. 2015, , 449, 1177

    2015

  72. [80]

    2010, , 404, 1639

    Vazdekis , A., S \'a nchez-Bl \'a zquez , P., Falc \'o n-Barroso , J., et al. 2010, , 404, 1639

    2010

  73. [81]

    C., Verdes-Montenegro , L., et al

    Verley , S., Odewahn , S. C., Verdes-Montenegro , L., et al. 2007, , 470, 505

    2007

  74. [82]

    R., Tinker , J

    Wetzel , A. R., Tinker , J. L., Conroy , C., & van den Bosch , F. C. 2014, , 439, 2687

    2014

  75. [83]

    2021, , 505, 4920

    Winkel , N., Pasquali , A., Kraljic , K., et al. 2021, , 505, 4920

    2021

  76. [84]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  77. [85]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.