Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 88 references

Metrology in a two-electron atom: The ionization energy of metastable triplet helium ($\mathbf{2\,^3S}_\mathbf{1}$)

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Measuring helium's metastable triplet ionization energy at 6 kHz precision widens the experiment–theory discrepancy in the two-electron atom to 9 sigma.

desk verdict A careful, high-precision measurement that sharpens the helium ionization-energy discrepancy to 9 sigma; the main caveat is an unpropagated systematic in the Rydberg extrapolation that probably does not remove the discrepancy. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02983 v1 pith:CFCYRQKX submitted 2025-01-06 physics.atom-ph

Gloria Clausen , Kai Gamlin , Josef A. Agner , Hansjürg Schmutz , Frédéric Merkt This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords heliummetastabletripletionizationenergyRydbergseriesextrapolationquantumdefectDoppler-freespectroscopyfrequencycombcalibrationelectrodynamicstest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a new determination of the ionization energy of the metastable triplet state $(1s)(2s)\,{}^3S_1$ of helium, the simplest two-electron atom, at a combined precision of roughly 6 kHz — about five times better than the previous best measurement. Extrapolating Doppler-free spectra of the $np$ Rydberg series to its limit gives $E_\mathrm{I}(2\,{}^3S_1)/h = 1\,152\,842\,742.7082(55)_\mathrm{stat}(25)_\mathrm{sys}$ MHz, a value that deviates by 9$\sigma$ from the most precise ab initio calculation, widening a discrepancy earlier experiments had indicated at the level of 7$\sigma$. If the result holds, the theoretical framework for two-electron atoms — including quantum-electrodynamics and nuclear-size corrections — is missing something at the few-hundred-kilohertz level in this benchmark system. It also means the calculations cannot currently serve as the theory input for extracting nuclear charge radii from helium spectroscopy, which is why the paper proposes a matching measurement in ${}^3\mathrm{He}$, where most theoretical uncertainties cancel in the isotope shift.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the Rydberg–Ritz extrapolation $E_n/h = E_\mathrm{I}/h - R_\mathrm{He}\,c/(n^*)^2$, with effective principal quantum number $n^* = n - \delta(n)$ and an energy-dependent quantum defect $\delta(n) = \delta_0 + \delta_2/(n^*)^2 + \delta_4/(n^*)^4 + \delta_6/(n^*)^6 + \delta_8/(n^*)^8$. The seven measured transitions ($n = 27$–$55$) lie deep in the Rydberg region, so the extrapolation to the series limit depends on the energy-dependent parameters $\delta_2$ through $\delta_8$, which the fit fixes from the low-$n$ end of the series using the measured $2\,{}^3P \leftarrow 2\,{}^3S$ centroid and calculated $n = 3$–$10$ term values. On the experimental side, the load-bearing device is the interferometric retroreflection alignment: a Michelson interferometer with a corner cube in the reference arm encodes the misalignment angle between the incoming and reflected beams in the phase lag between detector quadrants, allowing the angle to be reduced below 20 $\mu$rad so that the residual first-order Doppler shift is converted into a statistical uncertainty by varying the beam velocity and extrapolating to zero velocity.

What would settle it

Record the $2\,{}^3S_1$ ionization energy using transitions at $n \gtrsim 80$, where the energy-dependent quantum-defect terms act differently than at $n = 27$–$55$, and extrapolate to the limit; if the resulting value of $E_\mathrm{I}$ moves by more than a few kHz relative to this result, the fixed low-$n$ parameters — not the theory — are generating part of the 9$\sigma$ offset. On the theory side, recomputing the triplet-state contribution at order $\alpha^7 m$ and changing the predicted ionization energy by more than 0.1 MHz would likewise localize the discrepancy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Rydberg-series extrapolation of the $(1s)(np)\,{}^3P_J \leftarrow (1s)(2s)\,{}^3S_1$ transitions, recorded with a new combination of interferometric retroreflection alignment, imaging-assisted Doppler-free detection, and SI-traceable frequency calibration, determines the ionization frequency $E_\mathrm{I}(2\,{}^3S_1)/h = 1\,152\,842\,742.7082(55)_\mathrm{stat}(25)_\mathrm{sys}$ MHz. This is the most accurate experimental value of this quantity reported to date, and it deviates by about $476(54)$ kHz, or 9$\sigma$, from the most precise ab initio theoretical result, confirming and sharpening the experiment–theory discrepancy that earlier work found at 7$\sigma$. Because the new value agrees within 2$\sigma$ with the independent route built from the $2\,{}^1S_0$ ionization energy and the singlet–triplet interval, the authors argue that the offset is unlikely to be an artifact of the particular Rydberg series or transitions measured here.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the energy-dependent quantum-defect parameters $\delta_2,\delta_4,\delta_6,\delta_8$, fixed from low-$n$ data that include calculated term values, correctly bridge the measured $n = 27$–$55$ transitions to the series limit; their uncertainties are not propagated into the reported error, so a shift of a few kHz in $E_\mathrm{I}$ is possible at the level of the claimed total uncertainty of about 6 kHz.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 9$\sigma$ offset is real, the current generation of ab initio helium calculations cannot serve as the theory input for extracting the $\alpha$-particle charge radius from helium spectroscopy; a missing contribution of roughly 0.5 MHz would have to be found in the triplet-state term values.
  • The new value agrees within 2$\sigma$ with the independent route built from the $2\,{}^1S_0$ ionization energy plus the singlet–triplet interval, so the two experimental paths to $E_\mathrm{I}(2\,{}^3S_1)$ are consistent and the discrepancy with theory is unlikely to come from the particular series measured.
  • With the energy-dependent quantum-defect parameters determined, the Rydberg–Ritz description now covers the whole $np$ triplet series and can be reapplied to other published transition frequencies as a cross-check; the paper does this for an earlier dataset and recovers the same ionization energy.
  • Carrying the same approach to ${}^3\mathrm{He}$ would determine the helium isotope shift of the ionization energy with sensitivity below $0.01\,\mathrm{fm}^2$ to the difference of the ${}^3\mathrm{He}^{2+}$ and ${}^4\mathrm{He}^{2+}$ charge radii, because most theoretical uncertainties cancel in the shift.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the energy-dependent quantum-defect parameters enter the fit from low-$n$ data that include calculated values, and their quoted uncertainties are not propagated into $E_\mathrm{I}$, the reported error budget leaves room for a few-kHz-level shift of the series limit even though the two experimental routes to the ionization energy agree with each other.
  • The experimental recipe transfers directly to other atoms and molecules whose transitions lie below about 280 nm, where fiber-based retroreflection fails and first-order Doppler shifts have historically limited accuracy; laser-coolable species and metastable states are the natural candidates.
  • The paper's account of recent theory — where improved singlet–triplet mixing and higher-order QED contributions resolved several related helium inconsistencies — implies that if this offset is real, the missing physics is more likely specific to the triplet Rydberg series or the ionization limit than to the low-lying intervals where experiment and theory already agree.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a new determination of the ionization energy of the metastable triplet helium state 2^3S_1 by extrapolating the np Rydberg series for n=27, 29, 33, 35, 40, 50, and 55. The measurement uses a cryogenic supersonic beam, imaging-assisted single-photon Doppler-free spectroscopy, interferometric laser-alignment control, and SI-traceable frequency calibration. The result is E_I(2^3S_1)/h = 1,152,842,742.7082(55)_stat(25)_sys MHz, which deviates by about 9σ from the theoretical value of Patkóš, Yerokhin, and Pachucki. The paper documents a detailed systematic budget covering photon recoil, post-selection shifts, ac and dc Stark shifts, Zeeman shifts, pressure shifts, and second-order Doppler shifts, and it includes an appendix describing the Rydberg-series extrapolation.

Significance. If the uncertainty budget is complete, this is the most accurate experimental determination of the 2^3S_1 ionization energy to date and an important benchmark for helium quantum-electrodynamics calculations. The experimental approach is well suited to precision UV spectroscopy, and the paper is unusually careful in documenting systematic effects and in providing internal consistency checks, including comparisons with earlier values from Ref. 55. The result strengthens the existing theory-experiment discrepancy in a fundamental two-electron system. However, the headline uncertainty and the exact significance level depend on the treatment of the fixed quantum-defect parameters, which is the subject of the first major comment below.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III C and Appendix (Eq. 9, Tables II and III)] The Rydberg-series extrapolation holds the energy-dependent quantum-defect parameters δ2, δ4, δ6, and δ8 fixed, and the uncertainties quoted for these parameters in Table III are not propagated into the reported value or uncertainty of E_I. The Appendix describes a two-step iterative fit in which E_I and δ0 are first adjusted to the n=27–55 data and the δ2…δ8 are then fitted from the n=2–10 data, including the calculated n=3–10 frequencies of Morton et al. [11]. Because the high-n data cover only a limited range of binding energy, the extrapolation to the series limit depends on the shape of δ(n). A change of 4×10^-6 in δ2, its quoted 1-σ uncertainty, shifts the n=27 term by about 2R_He Δδ2/n^5 ≈ 1.8 kHz before E_I and δ0 are refitted, and correlated changes in the low-n anchors can leave a residual E_I shift at the kHz level. The stated low-n accuracy of "better than 2 MHz" does not exclude a 1-MHz systematic error in the calculated anchors that could shift E_I by several kHz. This missing contribution is load-bearing for the claimed 5.5-kHz statistical and 2.5-kHz systematic uncertainties and hence for the "unprecedented accuracy" claim. I recommend propagating the uncertainties and correlations of the fixed parameters, for example by a Monte Carlo refit that includes the low-n data with their uncertainties, or reporting the sensitivity ∂E_I/∂δ_i and adding the resulting term to the uncertainty budget.
  2. [Appendix, Table V] The n=3–10 anchor frequencies used to determine δ2…δ8 are not experimental values but calculated transition frequencies from Morton et al. [11]. This does not make the comparison circular, because the target theoretical value of Patkóš et al. [20] is not the source of the anchors, but it does mean that the extracted E_I is not a purely experimental quantity: it inherits the model assumptions of the low-n calculations through the quantum-defect shape. The paper should state this dependence explicitly and quantify how E_I changes if the anchors are replaced by experimental values or by the newer theoretical energies used in the comparison. Without such a sensitivity analysis, the description of the result as a direct experimental determination is stronger than the analysis supports.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix] There is a typo in the first paragraph: "new measuremenets" should be "new measurements."
  2. [Table I, note d] Note d states that the systematic uncertainties add up linearly to 2.5 kHz; it would be clearer to state this explicitly in the table caption and to also give the quadrature sum for comparison.
  3. [Fig. 10 inset] The horizontal axis of the inset is labeled "Measurement index" in the text but not in the figure itself; adding an axis label would improve readability.
  4. [Eq. (2)] The underbrace alignment in Eq. (2) makes the expression difficult to parse; a conventional multi-line presentation of the frequency relation would be easier for readers to follow.
  5. [Conclusions] The Conclusions describe the improvement as "almost one order of magnitude," whereas the Abstract states a five-fold improvement; these statements should be made consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the ionization energy is extracted from absolute high-n transition frequencies, and the theoretical low-n anchors only fix the quantum-defect shape without injecting the target value.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Centroid frequencies of the (1s)(np) 3P_J <- (1s)(2s) 3S_1 transitions (Table II) are corrected for recoil, Stark, Doppler, and blackbody shifts and fitted with the Rydberg-Ritz formula (Eq. 7) using the energy-dependent quantum defect of Eq. 9. The target EI(2 3S_1)/h and delta0 are fitted to the high-n data; the shape parameters delta2...delta8 are fixed from low-n data that include the experimental 2^3P frequency [37] and theoretical n=3-10 transition frequencies [11]. The target value is not an input to those anchors: they constrain the series shape, not the series limit. The comparison with Patkos et al. [20] is a genuine external benchmark, and the earlier Clausen et al. [42] and Ref. [55] citations are consistency checks and method background, not load-bearing evidence for the central result. The unpropagated uncertainties of the fixed delta parameters are a legitimate systematic concern, but they are not a circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or entities; all corrections use established physics (recoil, Doppler, Stark, Zeeman, pressure, blackbody).

free parameters (7)
  • E_I(2^3S_1)/h = 1,152,842,742.7082(55) MHz
    Central fitted quantity from Rydberg-series extrapolation; the paper's headline result.
  • delta0 (centroid quantum defect) = 0.06835526(4)
    Fitted in the first step of the two-step quantum-defect adjustment.
  • delta2 (quantum-defect coefficient) = -0.018752(4)
    Fitted from low-n data (n=2-10) in the second step; fixed in the high-n extrapolation.
  • delta4 (quantum-defect coefficient) = -0.0110(1)
    Fitted from low-n data; fixed in high-n extrapolation.
  • delta6 (quantum-defect coefficient) = -0.0158(9)
    Fitted from low-n data; fixed in high-n extrapolation.
  • delta8 (quantum-defect coefficient) = 0.010(2)
    Fitted from low-n data; fixed in high-n extrapolation.
  • alpha* (Stark polarizability coefficient of np series) = 3.15e-15 MHz/(mV/cm)^2
    Measured using n>=100 transitions; used with n^7 scaling to correct dc-Stark shifts at n=27-55.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Rydberg-Ritz formula with power-series quantum defect describes all measured np series frequencies.
    Eqs. 7 and 9 assume the centroid series follows this single-channel parameterization with negligible perturbations.
  • domain assumption Low-n transition energies from Cancio Pastor et al. [37] and theoretical energies from Morton et al. [11] are accurate enough to fix delta2 through delta8.
    Appendix: the low-n data anchor the energy-dependent quantum-defect terms used in the extrapolation.
  • domain assumption Residual first-order Doppler shift is linear in beam velocity and removed by extrapolation to zero velocity.
    Section III A: centroid frequencies are extrapolated linearly to zero beam velocity after multiple alignments.
  • domain assumption Line shapes are sums of three Gaussians with 5:3:1 relative intensities and no bias in the fitted centroid.
    Section III: fits use fixed intensity ratios; imperfect line shape could shift the centroid.
  • domain assumption Stray electric fields are fully compensated only near the center; measured field distribution and n^7 scaling give reliable Stark corrections.
    Section III B: Stark shifts at n=27-55 are inferred from n=100 field measurements.
  • domain assumption Computed blackbody ac-Stark shift of 2.2 kHz with 50% uncertainty captures the thermal environment.
    Section III B: systematics table assigns 1.1 kHz uncertainty to the largest systematic correction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Metrology in a two-electron atom: The ionization energy of metastable triplet helium ($\mathbf{2\,^3S}_\mathbf{1}$)." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CFCYRQKX

@misc{pith2026250102983,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Metrology in a two-electron atom: The ionization energy of metastable triplet helium ($\mathbf2\,^3S_\mathbf1$)},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CFCYRQKX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02983}
}
abstract

Helium (He) is the ideal atom to perform tests of ab-initio calculations in two-electron systems that consider all known effects, including quantum-electrodynamics and nuclear-size contributions. Recent state-of-the-art calculations and measurements of energy intervals involving the He $2\;^3S_1$ metastable state reveal discrepancies at the level of $7\,\sigma$ that require clarification both from the experimental and theoretical sides. We report on a new determination, with unprecedented accuracy, of the ionization energy $E_\mathrm{I}\,(2\;^3S_1)$ of the $(1s)(2s)\;^3S_1$ metastable state of He. The measurements rely on a new approach combining interferometric laser-alignment control, SI-traceable frequency calibration and imaging-assisted Doppler-free spectroscopy. With this approach we record spectra of the $np$ Rydberg series in a highly-collimated cold supersonic beam of metastable He generated by a cryogenic valve and an electric discharge. Extrapolation of the Rydberg series yields a new value of the ionization energy ($E_\mathrm{I}\,(2\;^3S_1)/h= 1\,152\,842\,742.7082(55)_\mathrm{stat}(25)_\mathrm{sys}\,\mathrm{MHz}$) that deviates by $9\,\sigma$ from the most precise theoretical result ($1\,152\,842\,742.231(52)\;\mathrm{MHz}$), reported by Patk\'o\v{s}, Yerokhin and Pachucki [Phys. Rev. A. 103, 042809 (2021)], confirming earlier discrepancies between experiment and theory in this fundamental system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02983 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic overview of the experimental setup. (a) Bottom: Vacuum system with valve, discharge electrodes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of the frequency-calibration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Principle of IASS, adapted from Ref. [55]. Top: Ge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a)-(f) Calculated interference patterns formed by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Imaging-assisted Doppler-free spectra, shifted along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Origin of the post-selection Doppler shift. (a) Top: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Centroid transition frequencies of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Illustration of the electric-field compensation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Frequency residuals of the np series of triplet He obtained in a least-squares fit based on the Rydberg-Ritz for￾mula (Eqs. 7 and 9). The error bars for individual data points represent the standard deviation and the top axis indi￾cates the binding energies ( RHe n2 h…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Drake, Quantum Defect Theory and Analysis of High- Precision Helium Term Energies, Adv

    G. Drake, Quantum Defect Theory and Analysis of High- Precision Helium Term Energies, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 32, 93 (1994)

    work page 1994

  2. [20]

    Patk´ oˇ s, V

    V. Patk´ oˇ s, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Nonradia- tive α7m QED effects in the Lamb shift of helium triplet states, Phys. Rev. A 101, 062516 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [1]

    H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms(Springer, Berlin, 1957)

    1957

  4. [2]

    nonexotic

    Frequency drifts of the cavity are quantified by refer- encing the ultrastable laser to an SI-traceable frequency standard ( νSI with beat frequency ∆ νSI USL, see Fig. 2) provided by the Swiss Federal Institute of Metrology, METAS, through a stabilized fiber network [60]. The frequency-comb output is frequency doubled, am- plified and spectrally broadene...

  5. [3]

    Araki, Quantum-Electrodynamical Corrections to Energy-Levels of Helium, Progress of Theoretical Physics 17, 619 (1957)

    H. Araki, Quantum-Electrodynamical Corrections to Energy-Levels of Helium, Progress of Theoretical Physics 17, 619 (1957)

    1957

  6. [4]

    P. K. Kabir and E. E. Salpeter, Radiative corrections to the ground-state energy of the helium atom, Phys. Rev. 108, 1256 (1957)

    1957

  7. [5]

    Schwartz, Fine structure of helium, Phys

    C. Schwartz, Fine structure of helium, Phys. Rev. 134, A1181 (1964)

    1964

  8. [6]

    Schwartz, Lamb shift in the helium atom, Phys

    C. Schwartz, Lamb shift in the helium atom, Phys. Rev. 123, 1700 (1961)

    1961

Show all 88 references
  1. [7]

    G. W. F. Drake and A. J. Makowski, Two-electron QED corrections in helium-like ions, Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics 18, L103 (1985)

    1985

  2. [8]

    Douglas and N

    M. Douglas and N. M. Kroll, Quantum electrodynami- cal corrections to the fine structure of helium, Annals of Physics 82, 89 (1974)

    1974

  3. [9]

    They are then kept fixed in the second step in which the values of δ2,...,8 are fitted using the n = 2 − 10 data

    In the first step, EI and δ0 are determined from the high-n data (Table II). They are then kept fixed in the second step in which the values of δ2,...,8 are fitted using the n = 2 − 10 data. The procedure is repeated until convergence is reached. The final results of the fit a...

  4. [10]

    W. C. Martin, Improved 4He I 1 snl ionization energy, energy levels, and Lamb shifts for 1 sns and 1snp terms, Phys. Rev. A 36, 3575 (1987)

    1987

  5. [12]

    G. W. F. Drake, High precision theory of atomic helium, Physica Scripta T83, 83 (1999)

    1999

  6. [13]

    D. C. Morton, Q. Wu, and G. W. F. Drake, Energy levels for the stable isotopes of atomic helium ( 4He I and 3He I), Can. J. Phys. 84, 83 (2006)

    2006

  7. [14]

    G. W. F. Drake and Z.-C. Yan, High-precision spec- troscopy as a test of quantum electrodynamics in light atomic systems, Can. J. Phys. 86, 45 (2008)

    2008

  8. [15]

    Pachucki, α4R corrections to singlet states of helium, Phys

    K. Pachucki, α4R corrections to singlet states of helium, Phys. Rev. A 74, 022512 (2006)

    2006

  9. [16]

    Pachucki, Helium energy levels including α6 correc- tions, Phys

    K. Pachucki, Helium energy levels including α6 correc- tions, Phys. Rev. A 74, 062510 (2006). 12

    2006

  10. [17]

    Pachucki, V

    K. Pachucki, V. Patk´ oˇ s, and V. A. Yerokhin, Testing fun- damental interactions on the helium atom, Phys. Rev. A 95, 062510 (2017)

    2017

  11. [18]

    G. W. F. Drake, Accuracy in atomic and molecular data, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 53, 223001 (2020)

    2020

  12. [19]

    V. A. Yerokhin, V. Patk´ oˇ s, and K. Pachucki, Relativistic corrections to the Bethe logarithm for the 2 3S and 2 3P states of He, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032503 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    Patk´ oˇ s, V

    V. Patk´ oˇ s, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Radiative α7m QED contribution to the helium Lamb shift, Phys. Rev. A 103, 012803 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Patk´ oˇ s, V

    V. Patk´ oˇ s, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Complete α7m Lamb shift of helium triplet states, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042809 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Aspect, N

    A. Aspect, N. Vansteenkiste, R. Kaiser, H. Haberland, and M. Karrais, Preparation of a pure intense beam of metastable helium by laser cooling, Chemical Physics 145, 307 (1990)

    1990

  16. [24]

    Morita and M

    N. Morita and M. Kumakura, Laser cooling of a helium atomic beam, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 30, L1678 (1991)

    1991

  17. [25]

    Lawall, S

    J. Lawall, S. Kulin, B. Saubamea, N. Bigelow, M. Leduc, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Three-dimensional laser cool- ing of helium beyond the single-photon recoil limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4194 (1995)

    1995

  18. [26]

    Rooijakkers, W

    W. Rooijakkers, W. Hogervorst, and W. Vassen, An in- tense collimated beam of metastable helium atoms by two-dimensional laser cooling, Optics Communications 123, 321 (1996)

    1996

  19. [27]

    Pereira Dos Santos, J

    F. Pereira Dos Santos, J. L´ eonard, J. Wang, C. J. Bar- relet, F. Perales, E. Rasel, C. S. Unnikrishnan, M. Leduc, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Bose-Einstein condensation of metastable helium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3459 (2001)

    2001

  20. [28]

    Vassen, Laser cooling and trapping of metastable helium: towards Bose–Einstein condensation, Comptes Rendus de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences - Series IV - Physics 2, 613 (2001)

    W. Vassen, Laser cooling and trapping of metastable helium: towards Bose–Einstein condensation, Comptes Rendus de l’Acad´ emie des Sciences - Series IV - Physics 2, 613 (2001)

    2001

  21. [29]

    J. C. J. Koelemeij, R. J. W. Stas, W. Hogervorst, and W. Vassen, Magneto-optical trap for metastable helium at 389 nm, Phys. Rev. A 67, 053406 (2003)

    2003

  22. [30]

    Keller, M

    M. Keller, M. Kotyrba, F. Leupold, M. Singh, M. Ebner, and A. Zeilinger, Bose-Einstein condensate of metastable helium for quantum correlation experiments, Physical Review A 90, 063607 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Clausen, L

    G. Clausen, L. Gabriel, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, T. Thiele, A. Wallraff, and F. Merkt, Combining laser cooling and Zeeman deceleration for precision spec- troscopy in supersonic beams, Phys. Rev. A 110, 042802 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Dulitz, A

    K. Dulitz, A. Tauschinsky, and T. P. Softley, Zeeman de- celeration of electron-impact-excited metastable helium atoms, New J. Phys. 17, 035005 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    J.-J. Chen, Y. R. Sun, J.-L. Wen, and S.-M. Hu, Speed- adjustable atomic beam of metastable helium for pre- cision measurements, Physical Review A 101, 053824 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Y. R. Sun and S.-M. Hu, Precision spectroscopy of atomic helium, National Science Review 7, 1818 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Shiner, R

    D. Shiner, R. Dixson, and P. Zhao, Precise measurement of the Lamb shift and fine structure of the 2S-2P transi- tion in triplet helium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1802 (1994)

    1994

  28. [36]

    R. J. Rengelink, Y. van der Werf, R. P. M. J. W. Noter- mans, R. Jannin, K. S. E. Eikema, M. D. Hoogerland, and W. Vassen, Precision spectroscopy of helium in a magic wavelength optical dipole trap, Nat. Phys. 14, 1132 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Luo, J.-L

    P.-L. Luo, J.-L. Peng, J.-T. Shy, and L.-B. Wang, Preci- sion frequency metrology of helium 2 1S0 → 2 1P1 tran- sition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 013002 (2013)

    2013

  30. [38]

    Luo, Y.-C

    P.-L. Luo, Y.-C. Guan, J.-L. Peng, J.-T. Shy, and L.-B. Wang, Measurement of the 2 1P1 → 3 1D2 transition frequency in 4He, Phys. Rev. A 88, 054501 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    Cancio Pastor, G

    P. Cancio Pastor, G. Giusfredi, P. De Natale, G. Hagel, C. de Mauro, and M. Inguscio, Absolute frequency mea- surements of the 2 3S1 → 2 3P0,1,2 atomic helium tran- sitions around 1083 nm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 023001 (2004)

    2004

  32. [40]

    Zheng, Y

    X. Zheng, Y. R. Sun, J.-J. Chen, W. Jiang, K. Pachucki, and S.-M. Hu, Measurement of the frequency of the 2 3S — 2 3P transition of 4He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 263002 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    Dorrer, F

    C. Dorrer, F. Nez, B. de Beauvoir, L. Julien, and F. Biraben, Accurate measurement of the 2 3S1 – 3 3D1 two-photon transition frequency in helium: New deter- mination of the 2 3S1 Lamb shift, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3658 (1997)

    1997

  34. [42]

    Luo, J.-L

    P.-L. Luo, J.-L. Peng, J. Hu, Y. Feng, L.-B. Wang, and J.-T. Shy, Precision frequency measurements of 3,4He 2 3P → 3 3D transitions at 588 nm, Phys. Rev. A 94, 062507 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Huang, Y.-C

    Y.-J. Huang, Y.-C. Guan, Y.-C. Huang, T.-H. Suen, J.- L. Peng, L.-B. Wang, and J.-T. Shy, Frequency measure- ment of the 2 1S0 −31D2 two-photon transition in atomic 4He, Phys. Rev. A 97, 032516 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    Clausen, P

    G. Clausen, P. Jansen, S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Ionization energy of the metastable 2 1S0 state of 4He from Rydberg-series ex- trapolation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 093001 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    van Rooij, J

    R. van Rooij, J. S. Borbely, J. Simonet, M. D. Hooger- land, K. S. E. Eikema, R. A. Rozendaal, and W. Vassen, Frequency metrology in quantum degenerate helium: Di- rect measurement of the 23S1 → 2 1S0 transition, Science 333, 196 (2011)

    2011

  38. [46]

    van der Werf, K

    Y. van der Werf, K. Steinebach, R. Jannin, H. L. Bethlem, and K. S. E. Eikema, The alpha and he- lion particle charge radius difference from spectroscopy of quantum-degenerate helium (2023), arXiv:2306.02333 [physics.atom-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Cancio Pastor, L

    P. Cancio Pastor, L. Consolino, G. Giusfredi, P. De Na- tale, M. Inguscio, V. A. Yerokhin, and K. Pachucki, Fre- quency metrology of helium around 1083 nm and deter- mination of the nuclear charge radius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 143001 (2012)

    2012

  40. [48]

    Shiner, R

    D. Shiner, R. Dixson, and V. Vedantham, Three-nucleon charge radius: A precise laser determination using 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3553 (1995)

    1995

  41. [49]

    Kramida, Ralchenko, Yu., J

    A. Kramida, Ralchenko, Yu., J. Reader, and NIST ASD Team, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (version 5.12), [Online]. Available: https://physics.nist.gov/asd [Fri Nov 08 2024] (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Wienczek, K

    A. Wienczek, K. Pachucki, M. Puchalski, V. Patk´ oˇ s, and V. A. Yerokhin, Quantum-electrodynamic corrections to the 1 s3d states of the helium atom, Phys. Rev. A 99, 052505 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Qi, P.-P

    X.-Q. Qi, P.-P. Zhang, Z.-C. Yan, L.-Y. Tang, A.-X. Chen, T.-Y. Shi, and Z.-X. Zhong, Revised 3He nuclear charge radius due to electronic hyperfine mixing (2024), 13 arXiv:2409.09279 [physics.atom-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Pachucki, V

    K. Pachucki, V. Patk´ oˇ s, and V. A. Yerokhin, Second- order hyperfine correction to H, D, and 3He energy levels, Phys. Rev. A 110, 062806 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    J. J. Krauth, K. Schuhmann, M. A. Ahmed, F. D. Amaro, P. Amaro, F. Biraben, T.-L. Chen, D. S. Covita, A. J. Dax, M. Diepold, L. M. P. Fernandes, B. Franke, S. Galtier, A. L. Gouvea, J. G¨ otzfried, T. Graf, T. W. H¨ ansch, J. Hartmann, M. Hildebrandt, P. Indelicato, L. Julien,...

    2021

  46. [54]

    Schuhmann, L

    The CREMA Collaboration, K. Schuhmann, L. M. P. Fernandes, F. Nez, M. A. Ahmed, F. D. Amaro, P. Amaro, F. Biraben, T.-L. Chen, D. S. Covita, A. J. Dax, M. Diepold, B. Franke, S. Galtier, A. L. Gou- vea, J. G¨ otzfried, T. Graf, T. W. H¨ ansch, M. Hilde- brandt, P. Indelicato, ...

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    V. A. Yerokhin, V. Patk´ oˇ s, and K. Pachucki, Relativistic Bethe logarithm for triplet states of helium-like ions, Eur. Phys. J. D 76, 142 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    V. A. Yerokhin, V. Patk´ oˇ s, and K. Pachucki, QEDmα7 effects for triplet states of heliumlike ions, Phys. Rev. A 107, 012810 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    Clausen, S

    G. Clausen, S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Imaging-assisted single-photon Doppler- free laser spectroscopy and the ionization energy of metastable triplet helium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 103001 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    Osterwalder and F

    A. Osterwalder and F. Merkt, Using high Rydberg states as electric field sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1831 (1999)

    1999

  51. [59]

    Beyer, N

    M. Beyer, N. H¨ olsch, J. A. Agner, J. Deiglmayr, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Metrology of high-n Rydberg states of molecular hydrogen with ∆ ν/ν = 2 × 10−10 accuracy, Phys. Rev. A 97, 012501 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    Scheidegger, J

    S. Scheidegger, J. A. Agner, H. Schmutz, and F. Merkt, Metrology of Rydberg states of the hydrogen atom, Phys. Rev. A 108, 042803 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    E. A. Donley, T. P. Heavner, F. Levi, M. O. Tataw, and S. R. Jefferts, Double-pass acousto-optic modulator sys- tem, Rev. Sci. Instr. 76, 063112 (2005)

    2005

  54. [62]

    Husmann, L.-G

    D. Husmann, L.-G. Bernier, M. Bertrand, D. Calonico, K. Chaloulos, G. Clausen, C. Clivati, J. Faist, E. Heiri, U. Hollenstein, A. Johnson, F. Mauchle, Z. Meir, F. Merkt, A. Mura, G. Scalari, S. Scheidegger, H. Schmutz, M. Sinhal, S. Willitsch, and J. Morel, SI- traceable frequ...

    2021

  55. [63]

    Beyer, L

    A. Beyer, L. Maisenbacher, A. Matveev, R. Pohl, K. Khabarova, Y. Chang, A. Grinin, T. Lamour, T. Shi, D. C. Yost, Th. Udem, T. W. H¨ ansch, and N. Ko- lachevsky, Active fiber-based retroreflector providing phase-retracing anti-parallel laser beams for precision spectroscopy, O...

    2016

  56. [64]

    Wirthl, L

    V. Wirthl, L. Maisenbacher, J. Weitenberg, A. Hertlein, A. Grinin, A. Matveev, R. Pohl, T. W. H¨ ansch, and T. Udem, Improved active fiber-based retroreflector with intensity stabilization and a polarization monitor for the near UV, Opt. Express 29, 7024 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    Wen, J.-D

    J.-L. Wen, J.-D. Tang, J.-F. Dong, X.-J. Du, S.-M. Hu, and Y. R. Sun, Doppler-free spectroscopy of an atomic beam probed in traveling-wave fields, Phys. Rev. A 107, 042811 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    D. J. Berkeland, E. A. Hinds, and M. G. Boshier, Precise optical measurement of lamb shifts in atomic hydrogen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2470 (1995)

    1995

  59. [67]

    R. C. Brown, S. Wu, J. V. Porto, C. J. Sansonetti, C. E. Simien, S. M. Brewer, J. N. Tan, and J. D. Gillaspy, Quantum interference and light polarization effects in unresolvable atomic lines: Application to a precise mea- surement of the 6,7Li D2 lines, Phys. Rev. A 87, 032504 (2013)

    2013

  60. [68]

    M¨ uller, S

    H. M¨ uller, S. Chiow, Q. Long, C. Vo, and S. Chu, Active sub-Rayleigh alignment of parallel or antiparallel laser beams, Opt. Lett. 30, 3323 (2005)

    2005

  61. [69]

    Y. R. Sun, J. Wen, and S. Hu, Precision spectroscopy of helium atoms (2024), Abstract, International Conference on Precision Physics of Simple Atomic Systems, PSAS

    2024

  62. [70]

    A. M. K¨ ohler, R. Reininger, V. Saile, and G. L. Find- ley, Density effects on high- n molecular Rydberg states: CH3I in He, Ne, Ar, and Kr, Phys. Rev. A 35, 79 (1987)

    1987

  63. [71]

    Fermi, Sopra lo spostamento per pressione delle righe elevate delle serie spettrali, Nuovo Cimento 11, 157 (1934)

    E. Fermi, Sopra lo spostamento per pressione delle righe elevate delle serie spettrali, Nuovo Cimento 11, 157 (1934)

    1934

  64. [72]

    Amaldi and E

    E. Amaldi and E. Segr` e, Effetto della pressione sui ter- mini elevati degli alcalini, Nuovo Cimento11, 145 (1934)

    1934

  65. [73]

    J. W. Farley and W. H. Wing, Accurate calculation of dynamic stark shifts and depopulation rates of rydberg energy levels induced by blackbody radiation. hydrogen, helium, and alkali-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. A 23, 2397 (1981)

    1981

  66. [74]

    L. L. Brown, J. A. L. Grondin, and S. D. Hogan, Demon- stration of a tunable interface between Rydberg atoms and superconducting microwave circuits with differential polarizability nulling, Phys. Rev. A 110, 022615 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    W. E. Cooke and T. F. Gallagher, Effects of blackbody radiation on highly excited atoms, Phys. Rev. A 21, 588 (1980)

    1980

  68. [76]

    Ritz, Zur Theorie der Serienspektren, Ann

    W. Ritz, Zur Theorie der Serienspektren, Ann. Phys. 317, 264 (1903)

    1903

  69. [77]

    T. Udem, L. Maisenbacher, A. Matveev, V. Andreev, A. Grinin, A. Beyer, N. Kolachevsky, R. Pohl, D. C. Yost, and T. W. H¨ ansch, Quantum interference line shifts of broad dipole-allowed transitions, Annalen der Physik 531, 1900044 (2019)

    2019

  70. [78]

    Zheng, Y

    X. Zheng, Y. R. Sun, J.-J. Chen, J.-L. Wen, and S.- M. Hu, Light-force-induced shift in laser spectroscopy of atomic helium, Physical Review A 99, 032506 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    Schneider, B

    A. Schneider, B. Sikora, S. Dickopf, M. M¨ uller, N. S. Oreshkina, A. Rischka, I. A. Valuev, S. Ulmer, J. Walz, Z. Harman, C. H. Keitel, A. Mooser, and K. Blaum, Di- rect measurement of the 3He+ magnetic moments, Na- ture 606, 878 (2022)

    2022

  72. [80]

    Tiesinga, P

    E. Tiesinga, P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, and B. N. Tay- lor, CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025010 (2021)

    2021

  73. [81]

    Pachucki and V

    K. Pachucki and V. A. Yerokhin, Theory of the Helium Isotope Shift, Journal of Physical and Chemical Refer- ence Data 44, 031206 (2015). 14

    2015

  74. [82]

    Sch¨ afer, M

    M. Sch¨ afer, M. Raunhardt, and F. Merkt, Millimeter- wave spectroscopy and multichannel quantum-defect- theory analysis of high Rydberg states of xenon: The hyperfine structure of 129Xe+ and 131Xe+, Phys. Rev. A 81, 032514 (2010)

    2010

  75. [83]

    Vassen and W

    W. Vassen and W. Hogervorst, High-resolution uv laser spectroscopy of the 1s2s 3S1→1snp (n=5–79) transitions in 3He and 4He, Phys. Rev. A 39, 4615 (1989)

    1989

  76. [84]

    Sch¨ afer and F

    M. Sch¨ afer and F. Merkt, Millimeter-wave spectroscopy and multichannel quantum-defect-theory analysis of high Rydberg states of krypton: The hyperfine structure of 83Kr+, Phys. Rev. A 74, 062506 (2006)

    2006

  77. [85]

    Osterwalder, A

    A. Osterwalder, A. W¨ uest, F. Merkt, and Ch. Jungen, High-resolution millimeter wave spectroscopy and mul- tichannel quantum defect theory of the hyperfine struc- ture in high Rydberg states of molecular hydrogen H2, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 11810 (2004)

    2004

  78. [86]

    Herburger, E

    H. Herburger, E. N. Toutoudaki, U. Hollenstein, and F. Merkt, High-resolution spectroscopy and multichan- nel quantum-defect-theory analysis of the np and nf Ry- dberg series of Xe below the 2P3/2 ionization threshold, Phys. Rev. A 109, 032816 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    Peper, Y

    M. Peper, Y. Li, D. Y. Knapp, M. Bileska, S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. P. Horvath, A. P. Burgers, and J. D. Thompson, Spectroscopy and modeling of 171Yb Rydberg states for high-fidelity two-qubit gates (2024), arXiv:2406.01482 [physics.atom-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  80. [2024]

    Shui-Ming Hu and Dr

    We thank Prof. Shui-Ming Hu and Dr. Yu R. Sun, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, for drawing our attention to this systematic effect

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.