Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 94 references

Double-$K$-hole resonances in single photoionization of He-like B$^{3+}$ ions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two series of hollow double-K-hole resonances appear in the single photoionization of He-like B3+ ions, and relativistic many-body perturbation theory fixes most of their energies to better than 1 meV, making them soft-X-ray calibration…

desk verdict Strong experimental plus MBPT study of B3+ double-K-hole resonances; the absolute sub-meV calibration claim is theory-dependent and should be tempered. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03043 v1 pith:RAJQCV2M submitted 2025-01-06 physics.atom-ph

A. Müller , P.-M. Hillenbrand , S.-X. Wang , S. Schippers , E. Lindroth , F. Trinter , J. Seltmann , S. Reinwardt
show 3 more authors
M. Martins A. S. Kheifets I. Bray
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-ph
keywords double-K-holeresonanceshollowatomsHe-likeB3+ionsautoionizingrelativisticmany-bodyperturbationtheorycomplexscalingsoft-X-rayenergycalibrationphotoionizationcrosssections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the observation of two series of 'hollow' resonances in the photoionization of helium-like B3+ ions, states in which both K-shell electrons are excited out of the core. One series arises from double excitation of the ground state and the other from excitation of the long-lived metastable state, covering photon energies from roughly 248 to 510 eV. Relativistic many-body perturbation theory places most of these resonance energies with estimated uncertainties below one milli-electronvolt, and below two milli-electronvolts for the highest members of the singlet series. If correct, these resonances become soft-X-ray calibration markers roughly twenty times sharper than the molecular reference lines currently used around these energies. The measurements also give a stringent test of correlated two-electron calculations, including quantum-electrodynamic corrections.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a relativistic all-order many-body perturbation theory for two-electron atoms, implemented on a discrete radial grid and a complete basis of hydrogen-like Dirac states in a spherical box. Complex scaling of the radial coordinates converts each autoionizing resonance into a square-integrable state, so its complex energy directly gives both the resonance position and its lifetime width. The electron-electron interaction is included to all orders through the Coulomb and Breit interactions with a multipole expansion up to $\ell_{\mathrm{max}} = 10$ and an extended model space for near-degenerate configurations. Radiative (Lamb-shift) contributions are estimated by weighting the hydrogenic $n \leq 2$ QED corrections by each configuration's mixing fraction. From this, the paper derives resonance energies, natural widths, Auger and radiative decay rates, branching ratios, asymmetry ($q$) parameters, and ionization resonance strengths that are then compared with the measured spectra.

What would settle it

Compute the $2s3p\,^3P$ and $2p3s\,^3P$ resonance energies (around 288.53 eV and 288.86 eV) from first principles with QED included to all orders in the nuclear binding and compare with the configuration-mixing-weighted estimates; a disagreement larger than about 1 meV would undercut the sub-meV claim. Alternatively, measure the absolute energy of the $2s2p\,^3P_{0,1,2}$ term near 248.25 eV with an energy scale not anchored to these MBPT values—for instance via dielectronic recombination of hydrogen-like B4+ with an electron beam whose energy is calibrated by laser spectroscopy—and test against the predicted 248.2446, 248.2518, and 248.2679 eV.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the single-photoionization cross section of B3+ contains two resolved families of autoionizing resonances with empty K shells: the $^1P_1$ series reached by double K-shell excitation from the $1s^2\,^1S_0$ ground level ($2\ell n\ell'$ with $n = 2$–$6$) and the $^3P_{0,1,2}$ series reached by single K-shell excitation from the $1s2s\,^3S_1$ metastable level (also $n = 2$–$6$). The strongest feature, $1s2s\,^3S_1 \to 2s2p\,^3P$ near 248.25 eV, has a natural width of about 9 meV and a resonance strength in the gigabarn range, enabling a resolving power near 29 000 and partial separation of the triplet fine structure. The accompanying relativistic many-body perturbation theory, using complex scaling to treat the autoionizing states and including Coulomb and Breit interactions to all orders with estimated QED and recoil corrections, yields resonance energies with estimated uncertainties below ±1 meV for nearly all levels and below 2 meV for the $2\ell n\ell'\,^1P$ levels with $n \geq 4$. The paper positions these energies, together with the accurately calculated K-shell ionization threshold at 259.3744095(15) eV, as a soft-X-ray calibration standard with roughly twenty times smaller uncertainty than the commonly used N2 reference near 400 eV.

Load-bearing premise

The calibration claim stands on the premise that the calculated resonance energies are accurate to about one milli-electronvolt even for the higher members of the series, where the small quantum-electrodynamic corrections are estimated by scaling hydrogenic values according to configuration mixing rather than computed from first principles—and the experiment's own energy scale is set by those same calculated values.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The $2s2p\,^3P$ term near 248 eV, with its 9 meV natural widths and high resonance strength, can be used as a bright, narrow calibration feature for soft-X-ray instruments.
  • The combined $^1P$ and $^3P$ series span 248–510 eV, allowing a single ion species to transfer the calibration across a large fraction of the soft-X-ray range.
  • Agreement of the MBPT $2\ell 2\ell'$ parameters with an independent complex-scaled configuration-interaction calculation to within a few tenths of a meV supports the reliability of the $n \geq 3$ predictions.
  • The fitted metastable fraction $f = 0.091(16)$ and the normalization to the direct-ionization continuum put the measured B3+ cross sections on an absolute scale.
  • Ionization with excitation of the remaining electron contributes only about 1.5–2% to the net single-ionization cross section, so the resonance spectrum can be analyzed as direct ionization plus isolated resonances.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the sub-meV energies survive independent scrutiny, the same merged-beams approach could be extended to neighboring He-like ions to build a chain of hollow-ion calibration lines across a broader energy range.
  • The QED recipe—scaling hydrogenic $n \leq 2$ Lamb shifts by configuration-mixing fractions—has no first-principles check for $n \geq 3$; a future measurement of the $2s3p$ and $2p3s$ triplet positions with an independently calibrated energy scale would test it directly.
  • The weakest features in the present data (e.g., the $2p4d$ and $2p5d$ resonances near 302.5 and 307.4 eV) are too weak to observe here but have sub-0.2-meV widths; with more beam current they could become even sharper calibration markers.
  • Because the experiment's photon-energy axis is calibrated to the MBPT energies, the reported measurement cannot validate the absolute sub-meV accuracy on its own; an independent measurement chain would be needed to close that loop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports merged-beams photoionization measurements of He-like B3+ at PETRA III, covering roughly 250-1200 eV, together with MBPT, CCC, HFR, and RPAE calculations. Two resonance series are identified: 1s2 1S -> 2lnl' 1P (n=2..6) hollow states near 450-510 eV and 1s2s 3S -> 2lnl' 3P (n=2..6) states near 248-310 eV. The MBPT calculations provide resonance energies, widths, Fano q parameters, Auger and radiative rates, and strengths; the experimental yields are normalized to calculated direct-ionization cross sections, the metastable fraction is fitted as f=0.091(16), and the resonance profiles are compared with theory at resolving powers up to about 29000. The paper's central quantitative claim is that the MBPT resonance energies are accurate to below about ±1 meV (below 2 meV for the n>=4 singlet 1P levels), making these resonances a soft-X-ray calibration standard at 248-510 eV with roughly 20 times smaller uncertainty than common molecular references.

Significance. If the claimed accuracy holds, this is a substantial advance: it would provide a new high-precision soft-X-ray calibration reference and a demanding benchmark for correlated two-electron structure calculations. The experimental dataset itself is valuable, with two double-K-hole resonance series observed in a He-like ion, high resolving powers, and a detailed comparison of line shapes and widths. Genuine strengths include the independent agreement of the MBPT 2l2l' resonance energies and Auger widths with the complex-scaled CI results of Zaytsev et al. (Table IV, agreement at the 0.2 meV level and better than 0.3% in widths), the consistency of the direct-ionization cross sections across eight theoretical approaches (Fig. 1), and the machine-readable Tables II and III that allow the resonance parameters to be reused. However, the central accuracy and calibration claim is not independently established: the experimental photon-energy axis is calibrated to the same MBPT resonance energies, and the QED corrections for the n>=3 resonances are estimated rather than computed ab initio.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. V and Sec. VI A] The absolute-energy agreement between experiment and MBPT is circular for the calibration claim. In Sec. V the photon-energy scale is corrected by ΔEph = 0.1012(7) eV from a fit in which the theoretical resonance energies Eres are held fixed, and Sec. VI A states explicitly that 'the experimental energy scale was calibrated to the theoretical resonance energies.' Therefore the excellent position agreement in Figs. 13-19, including Fig. 14, is not an independent test of the MBPT energies. This does not undermine the line-shape, width, or relative-strength analysis, but it removes the absolute resonance-energy agreement as support for the claimed sub-meV accuracy and for the proposed calibration standard. The authors should either calibrate against an independent reference (for example, the accurately known 1s2 1S -> 1s 2S K-edge threshold, or a separate absolute photon-energy standard) or explicitly restrict the claim to relative energies and line shapes.
  2. [Sec. III A, Tables II and III] The sub-meV error budget for the n>=3 resonances rests on an estimated, unbenchmarked QED correction. The text states that hydrogenic n<=2 QED corrections from Yerokhin and Shabaev are multiplied by configuration-mixing fractions for each resonance, with no independent all-order two-electron QED calculation for the 2lnl' n>=3 states. The excellent agreement with Zaytsev et al. in Table IV benchmarks only the 2l2l' levels; it does not directly certify the n>=3 states, where the configuration-mixing weighting and two-electron QED screening act differently. If the estimated QED contribution is off by a few meV, the claimed Tables II and III energies and the factor-of-20 improvement over molecular references would be eroded. A concrete way to reduce this risk would be to extend the complex-scaled ab initio QED/CI method of Zaytsev et al. to 2s3p and 2p3s, or to identify another independent benchmark; otherwise the accuracy claims should be downgraded and the calibration statement softened.
  3. [Table II and Sec. VII] For the very levels that carry the n>=4 singlet series observed as features C, D, and E (2p4s, 2p5s, and 2p6s 1P), Table II lists no extrapolated Eres values; only E0res without extrapolation is given. The text in Sec. VII nevertheless claims uncertainties below 2 meV for the 2lnl' 1P levels with n>=4, and the caption says the missing entries are due to omitted extrapolations. The paper should either provide the extrapolated final energies for these levels or state explicitly that the quoted uncertainty estimate applies to the unextrapolated E0res values. Without this, the calibration claim for the 450-510 eV range is not fully supported by a tabulated final value.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Several figures] Some figure panels and captions contain garbled axis labels and embedded fit-parameter text (for example, the apparent '3 004 005...' axis labels in Fig. 1 and the 'Gleichungformula goes here' text in Fig. 14). These should be cleaned and replaced with readable axis labels and a proper fit-parameter table.
  2. [Sec. III A and Sec. VII] There are typographical errors: 'sucessfully' should be 'successfully' in Sec. III A, and 'compehensive' should be 'comprehensive' in Sec. VII.
  3. [Table I] In the lower portion of Table I, the row for the metastable initial state is labeled '1s2s 3S0 B5+'; since the initial state is 1s2s 3S1 throughout the paper, this appears to be a typo and should be corrected.
  4. [Tables II and III] The notation for the QED-corrected energies is inconsistent: Table II uses E*res while Table III uses Eres* for the same type of quantity, and in Table III the 2s2p 1P entry mixes the omission of QED and of the 1.2 meV extrapolation correction. A single, clearly defined symbol and a consistent statement of which corrections are omitted would improve readability.
  5. [Sec. V] The determination of the metastable fraction f uses the same MBPT resonance strengths that are later compared with the normalized experimental spectra. The text explains this, but it should be stated explicitly in the final comparison that the absolute-strength agreement is partly constrained by the fitted f, and that the independent information lies in the relative line shapes, widths, and energy differences, not in the absolute scale.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Experimental energy-scale 'confirmation' of the MBPT resonance energies is by construction because the photon-energy axis was calibrated to those same MBPT resonance energies; the observation of the resonances and the shape/relative tests remain independent.

  1. self definitional [Sec. II (energy calibration), Sec. V (fit with Eres fixed), Sec. VI B (claimed confirmation)]
    "The fit shown in the figure by a solid red line was performed by keeping the theoretical resonance energies Eres, natural widths Γ, Fano parameters q, and ionization strengths Sion constant while the photon-energy bandwidth wG, an energy shift ∆ Eph, a scale factor A = Sexp/Stheo, and a constant background B were used as fit parameters. ... The Doppler-corrected photon-energy axis was then calibrated to the double-K-hole resonances calculated within this project with exceptionally high accuracy. ..."

    The energy offset Delta-Eph is a free fit parameter while all MBPT resonance energies Eres are held fixed; after the fit the experimental axis is explicitly recalibrated to those same theoretical resonance energies. Therefore the later statement that the experimental results confirm the theoretical energies is not an independent check of the absolute energy scale: the positions of the resonances used for the fit agree by construction, and the calibrated scans inherit the same theoretical absolute scale. What remains genuinely independent is the observation of the two resonance series, their relative spacings, widths, Fano shapes, and relative strengths, which do not reduce to the calibration.

full rationale

The MBPT calculation itself is a genuine, independent theoretical computation: it uses an all-order relativistic many-body method with an external hydrogenic QED input and is compared with an independent configuration-interaction calculation for the n=2 levels. No load-bearing self-citation chain was found; citations to Yerokhin et al., Zaytsev et al., and standard method papers are appropriate external or methodological support. The principal circularity is confined to the absolute-energy confirmation. Section II states that the Doppler-corrected photon-energy axis was calibrated to the double-K-hole resonances calculated within this project, and Section V confirms that the energy shift was obtained from a fit that kept the theoretical Eres values fixed. Consequently, when Section VI B says that 'the experimental results confirm the theoretical results' and that the theoretical energies 'fit the present experimental observations,' this agreement in absolute resonance energies is by construction, not a prediction tested by the data. This directly affects the central calibration-standard claim: the experiment demonstrates that narrow, strong resonances exist and can be used, but it cannot independently certify the claimed sub-meV accuracy of the MBPT energies on which the calibration standard rests. The metastable fraction f=0.091 and the absolute cross-section normalization are disclosed theory-based calibrations, not hidden circularity, though they mean the absolute strength scale is also theory-anchored. The weighting of hydrogenic n<=2 QED shifts by configuration-mixing fractions for n>=3 resonances is an unbenchmarked approximation; this is a correctness risk rather than a circular step. On balance, one central 'prediction' — the absolute resonance energy agreement — reduces by construction, warranting a score of 6; the observation, relative spectroscopy, widths, and shapes retain substantial independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The calculation relies on established MBPT, CCC, RPAE, and HFR machinery rather than new entities. The main fitted quantities are the metastable beam fraction and the smooth normalization function; the photon-energy calibration itself is set to MBPT theory. No invented particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • metastable fraction f = 0.091(16)
    Determined by fitting measured B4+ yield to theoretical resonance strengths via Eqs. 8-11 in Sec. V; used in all cross-section normalizations.
  • smooth normalization function N(Eph) = not tabulated
    Energy-dependent factor applied to measured yields to match the model direct-ionization cross section (Sec. V); the beam form factor was not measured independently.
  • photon-energy bandwidth wG in fits = 48.2(1.7) meV and 8.5 meV in different scans
    Gaussian resolution width fitted to line shapes when comparing theory and experiment (Secs. V and VI).
  • fit scale factor A and background B = A=6.35(19) y.u./Mb, B=35.59(1.40) y.u.
    Intermediate fit parameters in Sec. V used to determine f and the normalization factor N.
  • CCC basis parameters = ell_max=4, lambda=3, N0=35
    Chosen computational parameters for the Laguerre basis in the CCC calculation (Sec. III B), tested for convergence but not fitted to the present data.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption MBPT with complex rotation correctly describes autoionizing states and yields complex energies whose imaginary parts give widths.
    Method taken from prior work by Lindroth and Argenti, previously applied to C4+ (Sec. III A), but not independently re-derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper QED corrections for doubly excited states can be estimated by weighting hydrogenic n<=2 QED corrections from Yerokhin and Shabaev with configuration-mixing fractions.
    Sec. III A states this estimation procedure explicitly; it is not a first-principles QED calculation for n>=3 and has no external benchmark at sub-meV accuracy.
  • domain assumption The parent B3+ beam contains only the 1s2 1S ground state and the 1s2s 3S metastable state, with no significant 1s2s 1S component.
    Sec. II argues from a previous ECRIS experiment that the 1s2s 1S fraction is below 1%, but this is not measured in the present run.
  • domain assumption The direct-ionization cross-section model chosen as the arithmetic mean of Verner et al. and Mikhailov et al. is accurate to about +/-10%.
    Sec. V uses this model to normalize the whole experimental yield spectrum; the uncertainty is estimated from the spread of eight calculations in Fig. 1.
  • domain assumption The beam-overlap form factor N(Eph) varies smoothly with photon energy over the scanned range.
    Sec. V assumes this to justify normalizing the entire yield curve with a smooth function; the form factor was not directly measured.
  • domain assumption LS-coupling labels for the doubly excited states are meaningful despite strong configuration mixing.
    The paper notes that names reflect only the leading configuration, e.g., 2s4p J=1 is actually 51% 2s4p and 44% 2p4s (Sec. IV), so the labels are a simplification.
  • domain assumption Retaining only open channels in the CCC calculation is sufficient for convergence of single-photoionization cross sections.
    Sec. III B states that closed-state contributions were found insignificant, but the statement is not fully documented with convergence data in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Double-$K$-hole resonances in single photoionization of He-like B$^{3+}$ ions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RAJQCV2M

@misc{pith2026250103043,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Double-$K$-hole resonances in single photoionization of He-like B$^3+$ ions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RAJQCV2M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03043}
}
abstract

Within a joint experimental and theoretical research project, single photoionization of He-like B$^{3+}$ ions was investigated in the energy range from approximately 250 to 1200~eV. With the parent-ion beam in the experiment containing both $1s^2~^1S$ ground-state and $1s2s~^3S$ metastable B$^{3+}$ ions, double-core-hole resonances could be studied. Two series of hollow resonant states were observed, one populated by $K$-shell double excitation $1s^2~^1S \to 2\ell n\ell'~^1P$ ($\ell=s,p$; $\ell'=p,s$; $n=2,3,..,6$) at photon energies up to about 510~eV, the other by $K$-shell single excitation $1s2s~^3S \to 2\ell n\ell'~^3P$ ($\ell=s,p$; $\ell'=p,s$; $n=2,3,..,6$) at energies up to about 310~eV. High resolving powers up to approximately 29000 were achieved. The relativistic many-body perturbation theory was employed to determine level-to-level cross sections for $K$-shell excitation with subsequent autoionization. The resonance energies were calculated with inclusion of electron correlation and radiative contributions. The energy uncertainties of the most prominent resonances are estimated to be below $\pm 1$ meV. Convergent close coupling (CCC) calculations provided single-photoionization cross sections $\sigma_{34}$ for B$^{3+}$ including the resonant and non-resonant channels. Apart from the resonances, $\sigma_{34}$ is dominated by direct ionization in the investigated energy range. The contribution $\sigma_{34}^{\mathrm{dir}}$ of the latter process to $\sigma_{34}$ was separately determined by using the random-phase approximation with exchange and relativistic Hartree-Fock calculations which agree very well with previous calculations. Direct ionization of one electron accompanied by excitation of the remaining electron was treated by the CCC theory and found to be a minor contribution to $\sigma_{34}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03043 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (color online) Theoretical cross sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (color online) Theoretical cross sections for direct [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (color online) Theoretical cross sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (color online) Resonance contributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (color online) Theoretical cross sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (color online) Cross sections for net single pho [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Cross section for single photoionization of metastable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (color online) Cross sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (color online) Total cross sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (color online) Measured B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. (color online) Apparent experimental B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. (color online) Characteristic features in the apparent experimental photoionization cross sections for a mixed beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. (color online) High-resolution measurement of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. (color online) The 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. (color online) Cross sections [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_17.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. (color online) Detail of Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_19.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. S. Cederbaum, F. Tarantelli, A. Sgamellotti, and J. Schirmer, On double vacancies in the core, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 6513 (1986)

    1986

  2. [2]

    Santra, N

    R. Santra, N. V. Kryzhevoi, and L. S. Cederbaum, X- ray two-photon photoelectron spectroscopy: A theoret- ical study of inner-shell spectra of the organic para- aminophenol molecule, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 013002 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    Berrah, L

    N. Berrah, L. Fang, B. Murphy, T. Osipov, K. Ueda, E. Kukk, R. Feifel, P. van der Meulen, P. Salen, H. T. Schmidt, R. D. Thomas, M. Larsson, R. Richter, K. C. Prince, J. D. Bozek, C. Bostedt, S. Wada, M. N. Pi- ancastelli, M. Tashiro, and M. Ehara, Double-core-hole spectroscopy for chemical analysis with an intense x-ray femtosecond laser, Proc. Natl. Aca...

    2011

  4. [4]

    Nakano, F

    M. Nakano, F. Penent, M. Tashiro, T. P. Groz- danov, M. ˇZitnik, S. Carniato, P. Selles, L. Andric, P. Lablanquie, J. Palaudoux, E. Shigemasa, H. Iwayama, Y. Hikosaka, K. Soejima, I. H. Suzuki, N. Kouchi, and K. Ito, Single photon K −2 and K −1K −1 double core ion- ization in C 2H2n (n = 1 − 3), CO, and N 2 as a poten- tial new tool for chemical analysis,...

    2013

  5. [5]

    Ismail, A

    I. Ismail, A. Fert´ e, F. Penent, R. Guillemin, D. Peng, T. Marchenko, O. Travnikova, L. Inhester, R. Ta ¨ ıeb, A. Verma, N. Velasquez, E. Kukk, F. Trinter, D. Koulen- tianos, T. Mazza, T. M. Baumann, D. E. Rivas, Y. Ovcharenko, R. Boll, S. Dold, A. De Fanis, M. Ilchen, M. Meyer, G. Goldsztejn, K. Li, G. Doumy, L. Young, G. Sansone, R. D¨ orner, M. N. Pia...

    2023

  6. [6]

    Trinter, L

    F. Trinter, L. Inhester, R. P¨ uttner, S. Malerz, S. Th¨ urmer, T. Marchenko, M. N. Piancastelli, M. Si- mon, B. Winter, and U. Hergenhahn, Radiationless de- cay spectrum of O 1s double core holes in liquid water, J. Chem. Phys. 160, 194503 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    G. W. F. Drake, Theoretical energies for the n=1 and n=2 states of the helium isoelectronic sequence up to Z=100, Can. J. Phys. 66, 586 (1988)

    1988

  8. [8]

    L. B. Madsen, Triply excited states: electron-electron correlations in lithium, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 36, R223 (2003)

    2003

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    Indelicato, QED tests with highly charged ions, J

    P. Indelicato, QED tests with highly charged ions, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 52, 232001 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    V. A. Zaytsev, A. V. Malyshev, and V. M. Shabaev, Complex-scaled ab initio QED approach to autoionizing states, Phys. Rev. A 107, 032801 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    R. P. Madden and K. Codling, New autoionizing atomic energy levels in He, Ne, and Ar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 516 (1963)

    1963

  4. [12]

    J. M. Rost, K. Schulz, M. Domke, and G. Kaindl, Res- onance parameters of photo doubly excited helium, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 30, 4663 (1997)

    1997

  5. [13]

    F. J. Wuilleumier, From doubly excited states of helium to triply excited states of lithium, Physics Essays 13, 230 (2000)

    2000

  6. [14]

    Tanner, K

    G. Tanner, K. Richter, and J.-M. Rost, The theory of two-electron atoms: between ground state and complete fragmentation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 497 (2000)

    2000

  7. [15]

    Wehlitz, Simultaneous emission of multiple electrons from atoms and molecules using synchrotron radiation, Adv

    R. Wehlitz, Simultaneous emission of multiple electrons from atoms and molecules using synchrotron radiation, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 58, 1 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Hoszowska, A

    J. Hoszowska, A. K. Kheifets, J.-C. Dousse, M. Berset, I. Bray, W. Cao, K. Fennane, Y. Kayser, M. Kavˇ ciˇ c, J. Szlachetko, and M. Szlachetko, Physical mechanisms 25 and scaling laws of K-shell double photoionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 073006 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    Hoszowska and J.-C

    J. Hoszowska and J.-C. Dousse, Photoinduced K-shell hollow atoms, J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 188, 62 (2013)

    2013

  10. [18]

    V. A. Zaytsev, I. A. Maltsev, I. I. Tupitsyn, and V. M. Shabaev, Complex-scaled relativistic configuration- interaction study of the LL resonances in heliumlike ions: From boron to argon, Phys. Rev. A 100, 052504 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    K. N. Lyashchenko, O. Y. Andreev, and D. Yu, QED calculation of two-electron one-photon transition proba- bilities in He-like ions, Phys. Rev. A 104, 012818 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    C. Wu, X. Ding, M. Cao, D. Zhang, M. Zhang, Y. Xue, D. Yu, and C. Dong, Energy levels and radiative transi- tion properties of the 2 s2p double K-shell vacancy state in He-like ions (4 ≤ Z ≤ 54), At. Data Nucl. Data 154, 101602 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    P. M. Becker and J. S. Dahler, Double excitation of he- lium by electron impact, Phys. Rev. 136, A73 (1964)

    1964

  14. [22]

    W. B. Westerveld, F. B. Kets, H. G. M. Heideman, and J. van Eck, Electron impact excitation of the (2 p2) 3P doubly excited state of helium, J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Phys. 12, 2575 (1979)

    1979

  15. [23]

    Padhy and D

    B. Padhy and D. K. Rai, Two-electron excitation in helium-like ions by electron impact, Pramana - J. Phys. 35, 341 (1990)

    1990

  16. [24]

    Mikhailov, I

    A. Mikhailov, I. Mikhailov, A. Nefiodov, and G. Plunien, Excitation of autoionizing states of helium-like ions by scattering of high-energy particles, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 116, 363 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    C. W. Woods, R. L. Kauffman, K. A. Jamison, N. Stolter- foht, and P. Richard, K-shell Auger-electron hypersatel- lites of Ne, Phys. Rev. A 12, 1393 (1975)

    1975

  18. [26]

    Rødbro, R

    M. Rødbro, R. Bruch, and P. Bisgaard, High-resolution projectile Auger spectroscopy for Li, Be, B and C excited in single gas collisions I. line energies for prompt decay, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 12, 2413 (1979)

    1979

  19. [27]

    M. Mack, J. H. Nijland, P. van der Straten, A. Niehaus, and R. Morgenstern, Correlation in double electron cap- ture in collisions of fully stripped ions on He and H 2, Phys. Rev. A 39, 3846 (1989)

    1989

  20. [28]

    Barat and P

    M. Barat and P. Roncin, Multiple electron capture by highly charged ions at keV energies, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 25, 2205 (1992)

    1992

  21. [29]

    E. P. Benis, T. J. M. Zouros, T. W. Gorczyca, A. D. Gonz´ alez, and P. Richard, Elastic resonant and nonres- onant differential scattering of quasifree electrons from B4+(1s) and B 3+(1s2) ions, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052718 (2004)

    2004

  22. [30]

    Bruch, G

    R. Bruch, G. Paul, J. Andr¨ a, and L. Lipsky, Autoioniza- tion of foil-excited states in Li I and Li II, Phys.Rev. A 12, 1808 (1975)

    1975

  23. [31]

    Kasthurirangan, J

    S. Kasthurirangan, J. K. Saha, A. N. Agnihotri, S. Bhat- tacharyya, D. Misra, A. Kumar, P. K. Mukherjee, J. P. Santos, A. M. Costa, P. Indelicato, T. K. Mukherjee, and L. C. Tribedi, Observation of 2 p3d 1P o → 1s3d 1De ra- diative transition in He-like Si, S, and Cl ions, Phy...

    2013

  24. [32]

    E. T. Kennedy, J. T. Costello, J. P. Mosnier, and P. van Kampen, VUV/EUV ionising radiation and atoms and ions: dual laser plasma investigations, Rad. Phys. Chem. 70, 291 (2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    Kilgus, J

    G. Kilgus, J. Berger, P. Blatt, M. Grieser, D. Habs, B. Hochadel, E. Jaeschke, D. Kr¨ amer, R. Neumann, G. Neureither, W. Ott, D. Schwalm, M. Steck, R. Stok- stad, E. Szmola, A. Wolf, R. Schuch, A. M¨ uller, and M. Wagner, Dielectronic recombination of hydrogenlike oxygen in a...

    1990

  26. [34]

    Verbundforschung

    As in panel (a), a Fano profile was fitted to the data points obtained by the CCC calculations at discrete photon energies. The resonance energy is about 0.15 eV different from that obtained by the MBPT calculations. The Fano q parameter derived from the fit is about 55% of th...

  27. [35]

    D. R. DeWitt, E. Lindroth, R. Schuch, H. Gao, T. Quin- teros, and W. Zong, Spectroscopy of highly doubly- excited states of helium through dielectronic recombina- tion, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 28, L147 (1995)

    1995

  28. [36]

    Bernhardt, C

    D. Bernhardt, C. Brandau, Z. Harman, C. Kozhuharov, A. M¨ uller, W. Scheid, S. Schippers, E. W. Schmidt, D. Yu, A. N. Artemyev, I. I. Tupitsyn, S. B¨ ohm, F. Bosch, F. J. Currell, B. Franzke, A. Gumberidze, J. Jacobi, P. H. Mokler, F. Nolden, U. Spillman, Z. Stachura, M. Steck...

    2011

  29. [37]

    S.-X. Wang, C. Brandau, S. Fritzsche, S. Fuchs, Z. Har- man, C. Kozhuharov, A. M¨ uller, M. Steck, and S. Schip- pers, Breit interaction in dielectronic recombination of hydrogenlike xenon ions: Storage-ring experiment and theory, Eur. Phys. J. D 78, 122 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    M¨ uller, A

    A. M¨ uller, A. Borovik Jr., K. Huber, S. Schippers, D. V. Fursa, and I. Bray, Double- K-vacancy states in electron-impact single ionization of metastable two- electron N5+(1s2s 3S1) ions, Phys. Rev. A 90, 010701(R) (2014)

    2014

  31. [39]

    M¨ uller, A

    A. M¨ uller, A. Borovik Jr., K. Huber, S. Schippers, D. V. Fursa, and I. Bray, Indirect contributions to electron- impact ionization of Li+(1s2s 3S1) ions: Role of interme- diate double-K-vacancy states, Phys. Rev. A 97, 022709 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Diehl, D

    S. Diehl, D. Cubaynes, J.-M. Bizau, F. J. Wuilleumier, E. T. Kennedy, J.-P. Mosnier, and T. J. Morgan, New high-resolution measurements of doubly excited states of Li+, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 32, 4193 (1999)

    1999

  33. [41]

    P. K. Carroll and E. T. Kennedy, Doubly excited au- toionization resonances in the absorption spectrum of Li+ formed in a laser-produced plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1068 (1977)

    1977

  34. [42]

    L. M. Kiernan, E. T. Kennedy, J.-P. Mosnier, J. T. Costello, and B. F. Sonntag, First observation of a pho- ton induced triply excited state in atomic lithium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2359 (1994)

    1994

  35. [43]

    Jannitti, P

    E. Jannitti, P. Nicolosi, and G. Tondello, Photoionization and double excitation spectrum of Be 2+, Opt. Commun. 50, 225 (1984)

    1984

  36. [44]

    S. W. J. Scully, I. ´Alvarez, C. Cisneros, E. D. Emmons, M. F. Gharaibeh, D. Leitner, M. S. Lubell, A. M¨ uller, R. A. Phaneuf, R. P¨ uttner, A. S. Schlachter, S. Schip- pers, and B. M. McLaughlin, Doubly excited resonances in the photoionization spectrum of Li +: Experiment a...

    2006

  37. [45]

    M¨ uller, E

    A. M¨ uller, E. Lindroth, S. Bari, A. Borovik, Jr., P.-M. Hillenbrand, K. Holste, P. Indelicato, A. L. D. Kilcoyne, S. Klumpp, M. Martins, J. Viefhaus, P. Wilhelm, and S. Schippers, Photoionization of metastable heliumlike C4+(1s2s 3S1) ions: Precision study of intermediate do...

    2018

  38. [46]

    Viefhaus, F

    J. Viefhaus, F. Scholz, S. Deinert, L. Glaser, M. Ilchen, J. Seltmann, P. Walter, and F. Siewert, The variable po- 26 larization XUV beamline P04 at PETRA III: optics, me- chanics and their performance, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A710, 151 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    C. G. Schroer, H.-C. Wille, O. H. Seeck, K. Bagschik, H. Schulte-Schrepping, M. Tischer, H. Graafsma, W. Laasch, K. Baev, S. Klumpp, R. Bartolini, H. Re- ichert, W. Leemans, and E. Weckert, The synchrotron radiation source PETRA III and its future ultra-low- emittance upgrade ...

    2022

  40. [48]

    Schippers, T

    S. Schippers, T. Buhr, A. Borovik Jr., K. Holste, A. Perry-Sassmannshausen, K. Mertens, S. Reinwardt, M. Martins, S. Klumpp, K. Schubert, S. Bari, R. Beer- werth, S. Fritzsche, S. Ricz, J. Hellhund, and A. M¨ uller, The photon-ion merged-beams experiment PIPE at PE- TRA III - ...

    2020

  41. [49]

    R. A. Phaneuf, C. C. Havener, G. H. Dunn, and A. M¨ uller, Merged-beams experiments in atomic and molecular physics, Rep. Prog. Phys. 62, 1143 (1999)

    1999

  42. [50]

    Schippers, S

    S. Schippers, S. Ricz, T. Buhr, A. Borovik Jr., J. Hell- hund, K. Holste, K. Huber, H.-J. Sch¨ afer, D. Schury, S. Klumpp, K. Mertens, M. Martins, R. Flesch, G. Ulrich, E. R¨ uhl, T. Jahnke, J. Lower, D. Metz, L. P. H. Schmidt, M. Sch¨ offler, J. B. Williams, L. Glaser, F. Sch...

    2014

  43. [51]

    M¨ uller, D

    A. M¨ uller, D. Bernhardt, A. Borovik Jr., T. Buhr, J. Hell- hund, K. Holste, A. L. D. Kilcoyne, S. Klumpp, M. Mar- tins, S. Ricz, J. Seltmann, J. Viefhaus, and S. Schippers, Photoionization of Ne atoms and Ne + ions near the K edge: Precision spectroscopy and absolute cross-s...

    2017

  44. [52]

    Br¨ otz, R

    F. Br¨ otz, R. Trassl, R. W. McCullough, W. Arnold, and E. Salzborn, Design of compact all-permanent mag- net electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) ion sources for atomic physics experiments, Phys. Scr. T92, 278 (2001)

    2001

  45. [53]

    G. W. F. Drake, Theory of relativistic magnetic dipole transitions: Lifetime of the metastable 2 3S state of the heliumlike ions, Phys. Rev. A 3, 908 (1971)

    1971

  46. [54]

    A. C. Renwick, I. Bray, D. V. Fursa, J. Jacobi, H. Knopp, S. Schippers, and A. M¨ uller, Electron-impact ionization of B3+ ions, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 175203 (2009)

    2009

  47. [55]

    Derevianko and W

    A. Derevianko and W. R. Johnson, Two-photon decay of 2 1S0 and 2 3S1 states of heliumlike ions, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1288 (1997)

    1997

  48. [56]

    V. A. Yerokhin, V. Patk´ oˇ s, and K. Pachucki, QED calcu- lations of energy levels of heliumlike ions with 5 ≤ Z ≤ 30, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022815 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    R. N. S. Sodhi and C. E. Brion, Reference energies for in- ner shell electron energy-loss spectroscopy, J. Elec. Spec- trosc. Relat. Phenom. 34, 363 (1984)

    1984

  50. [58]

    Stierhof, S

    J. Stierhof, S. K¨ uhn, M. Winter, P. Micke, R. Steinbr¨ ugge, C. Shah, N. Hell, M. Bissinger, M. Hirsch, R. Ballhausen, M. Lang, C. Gr¨ afe, S. Wipf, R. Cumbee, G. L. Betancourt-Martinez, S. Park, J. Niskanen, M. Chung, F. S. Porter, T. St¨ ohlker, T. Pfeifer, G. V. Brown, S....

    2022

  51. [59]

    Salomonson and P

    S. Salomonson and P. ¨Oster, Relativistic all-order pair functions from a discretized single-particle Dirac Hamil- tonian, Phys. Rev. A 40, 5548 (1989)

    1989

  52. [60]

    Lindgren, The Rayleigh-Schr¨ odinger perturbation and the linked-diagram theorem for a multi-configurational model space, J

    I. Lindgren, The Rayleigh-Schr¨ odinger perturbation and the linked-diagram theorem for a multi-configurational model space, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 7, 2441 (1974)

    1974

  53. [61]

    Lindroth, Calculation of doubly excited states of he- lium with a finite discrete spectrum, Phys

    E. Lindroth, Calculation of doubly excited states of he- lium with a finite discrete spectrum, Phys. Rev. A 49, 4473 (1994)

    1994

  54. [62]

    Lestinsky, E

    M. Lestinsky, E. Lindroth, D. A. Orlov, E. W. Schmidt, S. Schippers, S. B¨ ohm, C. Brandau, F. Sprenger, A. S. Terekhov, A. M¨ uller, and A. Wolf, Screened radiative corrections from hyperfine-split dielectronic resonances in lithiumlike scandium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 033001 (2008)

    2008

  55. [63]

    Tokman, N

    M. Tokman, N. Ekl¨ ow, P. Glans, E. Lindroth, R. Schuch, G. Gwinner, D. Schwalm, A. Wolf, A. Hoffknecht, A. M¨ uller, and S. Schippers, Dielectronic recombination resonances in F 6+, Phys. Rev. A 66, 012703 (2002)

    2002

  56. [64]

    Lindroth and L

    E. Lindroth and L. Argenti, Atomic resonance states and their role in charge-changing processes, Adv. Quantum Chem. 63, 247 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    V. A. Yerokhin and V. M. Shabaev, Lamb shift of n = 1 and n = 2 states of hydrogen-like atoms, 1 ≤ Z ≤ 110, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 44, 033103 (2015)

    2015

  58. [66]

    D. S. Hughes and C. Eckart, The effect of the motion of the nucleus on the spectra of Li I and Li II, Phys. Rev. 36, 694 (1930)

    1930

  59. [67]

    A. S. Kheifets and I. Bray, Calculation of double photoionization of helium using the convergent close- coupling method, Phys. Rev. A 54, R995 (1996)

    1996

  60. [68]

    A. S. Kheifets and I. Bray, Photoionization with exci- tation and double photoionization of the helium isoelec- tronic sequence, Phys. Rev. A 58, 4501 (1998)

    1998

  61. [69]

    I. Bray, D. V. Fursa, A. S. Kheifets, and A. T. Stelbovics, Electrons and photons colliding with atoms: develop- ment and application of the convergent close-coupling method, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, R117 (2002)

    2002

  62. [70]

    A. W. Bray, A. S. Kheifets, and I. Bray, Calculation of atomic photoionization using the nonsingular convergent close-coupling method, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053405 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    R. D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spec- tra (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1981)

    1981

  64. [72]

    Martins, Photoionization of open-shell atoms: the chlorine 2p excitation, J

    M. Martins, Photoionization of open-shell atoms: the chlorine 2p excitation, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34, 1321 (2001)

    2001

  65. [73]

    Pines, Emergent behavior in strongly correlated elec- tron systems, Rep

    D. Pines, Emergent behavior in strongly correlated elec- tron systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 092501 (2016)

    2016

  66. [74]

    Co’, Introducing the random phase approximation theory, Universe 9, 141 (2023)

    G. Co’, Introducing the random phase approximation theory, Universe 9, 141 (2023)

    2023

  67. [75]

    M. Y. Amusia, Atomic photoeffect, in Physics of Atoms and Molecules , edited by K. T. Taylor (Plenum Press, New York, 1990)

    1990

  68. [76]

    M. Y. Amusia, Random phase approximation: From gi- ant to intra-doublet resonances, Rad. Phys. Chem. 70, 237 (2004)

    2004

  69. [77]

    K. L. Bell and A. E. Kingston, Photoionization cross sec- tions for the heliumisoelectronic series, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 4, 1308 (1971). 27

    1971

  70. [78]

    R. F. Reilman and S. T. Manson, Photoabsoprption cross sections for positive atomic ions with Z ≤ 30, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 40, 815 (1979)

    1979

  71. [79]

    D. A. Verner, D. G. Yakovlev, I. M. Band, and M. B. Trzhaskovskaya., Subshell photoionization cross sections and ionization energies of atoms and ions from He to Zn, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 55, 233 (1993)

    1993

  72. [80]

    Mikhailov, A

    A. Mikhailov, A. Nefiodov, and G. Plunien, Single pho- toeffect on helium-like ions in the non-relativistic region, Physics Letters A 368, 391 (2007)

    2007

  73. [81]

    Stobbe, Zur Quantenmechanik photoelektrischer Prozesse, Ann

    M. Stobbe, Zur Quantenmechanik photoelektrischer Prozesse, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 7, 661 (1930)

    1930

  74. [82]

    Fano, Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts, Phys

    U. Fano, Effects of configuration interaction on intensities and phase shifts, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866 (1961)

    1961

  75. [83]

    D. R. Herrick and O. Sinano˘ glu, Comparison of doubly- excited helium energy levels, isoelectronic series, autoion- ization lifetimes, and group-theoretical configuration- mixing predictions with large–configuration-interaction calculations and experimental spectra, Phys. Rev...

    1975

  76. [84]

    C. D. Lin, Classification of doubly excited states of two- electron atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1348 (1983)

    1983

  77. [85]

    C. D. Lin, Classification and supermultiplet structure of doubly excited states, Phys. Rev. A 29, 1019 (1984)

    1984

  78. [86]

    C. D. Lin, Hyperspherical coordinate approach to atomic and other Coulombic three-body systems, Phys. Rep. 257, 1 (1995)

    1995

  79. [87]

    Domke, C

    M. Domke, C. Xue, A. Puschmann, T. Mandel, E. Hudson, D. A. Shirley, G. Kaindl, C. H. Greene, H. R. Sadeghpour, and H. Petersen, Extensive double- excitation states in atomic helium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1306 (1991)

    1991

  80. [88]

    Domke, G

    M. Domke, G. Remmers, and G. Kaindl, Observation of the (2 p, nd) 1P o double-excitation Rydberg series of helium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1171 (1992)

    1992

  81. [89]

    Schulz, G

    K. Schulz, G. Kaindl, M. Domke, J. D. Bozek, P. A. Heimann, A. S. Schlachter, and J. M. Rost, Observation of new Rydberg series and resonances in doubly excited helium at ultrahigh resolution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3086 (1996)

    1996

  82. [90]

    P¨ uttner, B

    R. P¨ uttner, B. Gr´ emaud, D. Delande, M. Domke, M. Martins, A. S. Schlachter, and G. Kaindl, Statistical properties of inter-series mixing in helium: From integra- bility to chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3747 (2001)

    2001

  83. [91]

    E. T. Kennedy and P. K. Carroll, Satellite lines of low-Z elements (Li, Be, B) observed in laser-produced plasmas, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 11, 965 (1978)

    1978

  84. [92]

    Gning, M

    Y. Gning, M. Sow, A. Traor´ e, M. Dieng, B. Di- akhate, M. Biaye, and A. Wagu´ e, Calculations of reso- nances parameters for the ((2 s2) 1Se, (2s2p) 1,3P o) and ((3s2) 1Se, (3s3p) 1,3P o) doubly excited states of helium- like ions with Z ≤ 10 using a complex rotation method i...

    2015

  85. [93]

    Schippers, Analytical expression for the convolution of a Fano line profile with a Gaussian, J

    S. Schippers, Analytical expression for the convolution of a Fano line profile with a Gaussian, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 219, 33 (2018)

    2018

  86. [94]

    Reininger and A

    R. Reininger and A. R. B. de Castro, High resolution, large spectral range, in variable-included-angle soft x-ray monochromators using a plane VLS grating, Nucl. In- strum. Methods A 538, 760 (2005)

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.