Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Signs of `Everything Everywhere All At Once' formation in low surface brightness globular cluster-rich dwarf galaxies

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Five globular-cluster-rich, low-surface-brightness dwarf galaxies have flat age and flat-to-rising metallicity radial profiles, suggesting they formed everything everywhere all at once rather than growing from the outside in.

desk verdict Extends the flat-to-rising metallicity gradient result from two UDGs to five GC-rich LSB dwarfs; the co-eval formation claim is plausible but the three-point fits for three galaxies are the soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04088 v1 pith:AS46IUJK submitted 2025-01-07 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.CO

Anna Ferré-Mateu , Jonah Gannon , Duncan A. Forbes , Aaron J. Romanowsky , Maria Luisa Buzzo , Jean P. Brodie This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.CO
keywords ultra-diffusegalaxieslowsurfacebrightnessdwarfsstellarpopulationgradientsglobularcluster-richgalaxyformationpathwaysco-evalintegralfieldspectroscopydwarfevolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the unusual radial stellar-population trends seen in two ultra-diffuse galaxies are shared by other faint, globular-cluster-rich dwarfs, and what that implies for how such galaxies formed. Using annular spectra of five low-surface-brightness dwarfs, it finds uniformly flat age profiles and flat-to-rising metallicity profiles, in contrast to classical dwarf galaxies and most simulated dwarfs, whose metallicity declines outward. Four of the five galaxies fall at the flat-gradient end of the dwarf age-metallicity gradient distribution, which the authors read as evidence for co-eval formation, a mode they call 'everything everywhere all at once.' The exception is PUDG-R27, whose metallicity rises sharply outward and resists easy classification. If the result holds, it means the previously anomalous gradients of DF44 and NGC1052-DF2 are a general property of globular-cluster-rich low-surface-brightness dwarfs, not a two-object oddity.

What carries the argument

The central object is the pair of radial gradients—age gradient and metallicity gradient—for each galaxy, derived by fitting single stellar population models to spectra extracted in concentric annular apertures. This gradient pair is then plotted against the same pair for observed and simulated dwarfs; the diagnostic separates outside-in growth (positive age gradient, negative metallicity gradient) from the flat-gradient, co-eval regime at the zero-zero intersection. The phrase 'everything everywhere all at once' is the paper's label for the co-eval mode. The method's power is that one radial trend alone would not distinguish formation modes, but the joint position in the age-metallicity gradient plane does.

What would settle it

A decisive observation would be deeper integral-field spectroscopy that resolves at least five radial bins out to one effective radius for DF07, DFX1 and PUDG-R27; if the outermost bins then show metallicity declining instead of staying flat or rising, the central claim fails for those galaxies. A complementary mock-spectra test would fit the same three-annulus extraction to simulated galaxies with known declining metallicity gradients; if the fitting routine returns flat or rising slopes, the measured gradients would be suspect even if the physical claim still holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that all five globular-cluster-rich low-surface-brightness dwarfs studied—DF44 (re-analysed), DF07, DFX1, PUDG-R27, and VCC 1448—have age gradients consistent with zero (average about -0.003 Gyr per effective radius) and metallicity gradients that are flat or rise outward (average about +0.12 dex per effective radius). This mirrors the two previously resolved UDGs and contrasts with classical dwarfs, which typically show declining metallicity toward the outskirts, and with the TNG50 and NIHAO simulations, which predict declining or outer-declining metallicity profiles. On the age-gradient versus metallicity-gradient diagram the sample clusters at the zero-zero intersection, the region of 'flat' gradients, and the star formation histories show rapid mass build-up and early quenching. The authors conclude these galaxies most plausibly formed co-evally, with star formation spread across the whole galaxy at the same time, rather than by the outside-in growth that builds classical dwarfs; PUDG-R27 is the clear outlier with a pronounced rising metallicity gradient.

Load-bearing premise

For DF07, DFX1 and PUDG-R27, the gradients are linear fits to only three spectral annuli inside 0.7 effective radius with moderate signal-to-noise, so the flat-to-rising metallicity conclusion assumes those three points faithfully trace the true radial trend.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The flat-to-rising metallicity pattern ceases to be a two-galaxy anomaly, strengthening the case that globular-cluster-rich low-surface-brightness dwarfs form through a distinct channel.
  • Cosmological simulations of UDGs must reproduce flat or rising metallicity gradients in at least some dwarfs; simulations that only yield declining gradients are incomplete descriptions of the LSB dwarf population.
  • Radial coverage is decisive for classification: VCC 1448 looks classical-like inside 0.7 effective radius but joins the co-eval group when the gradient is measured farther out, so future surveys need to reach beyond one effective radius.
  • The co-eval interpretation implies that spatially resolved stellar populations, not just global properties, can identify formation pathway, linking globular-cluster richness to a galaxy-wide simultaneous starburst.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would compare gradients in globular-cluster-poor LSB dwarfs: if the flat-to-rising signature tracks GC richness, then GC systems are a tracer of the co-eval mode; if it appears in all LSB dwarfs, the mode is universal regardless of GC content.
  • A mock-recovery experiment on the same annular-extraction method would determine whether sparse three-aperture sampling at low signal-to-noise can bias linear fits toward flat or rising slopes, separating a physical trend from a selection artifact.
  • If the co-eval picture is right, the galaxies should show uniformly old stellar populations with little scatter in chemical abundances across radii; measuring higher-order abundance patterns or resolved colour-magnitude diagrams in the nearest target would test that prediction independently of spectral fitting.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This Letter presents spatially resolved stellar population gradients for five globular-cluster-rich low-surface-brightness dwarf galaxies (DF44, DF07, DFX1, PUDG-R27, and VCC 1448), using pPXF fits to annular spectra extracted from KCWI and literature data. The authors report flat age gradients and flat-to-rising metallicity gradients, compare these with classical dwarf galaxies and with the TNG50 and NIHAO simulations, and interpret the sample as consistent with an 'everything everywhere all at once' co-eval formation scenario, with PUDG-R27 as an extreme rising-metallicity case.

Significance. If the result is robust, this paper would expand the number of UDGs/LSB dwarfs with spatially resolved stellar populations from two to five, strengthening the case that GC-rich LSB dwarfs follow a different metallicity-gradient trend than classical dwarfs. The paper has notable strengths: the DF44 reanalysis reproduces the published Villaume et al. (2022) values, the comparison to simulations is performed on relative trends rather than absolute metallicities (with the -0.4 dex TNG50 shift clearly stated and shown not to affect the comparison), and the wording is generally cautious, including an explicit statement that higher S/N and larger samples are required. The main caveat is that for three of the five galaxies the gradients come from fits to only three low-S/N annuli, and the paper's own limitation statements in the abstract and conclusions reflect this fragility while still drawing a strong interpretive conclusion.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3, Table 1] For DF07, DFX1, and PUDG-R27, the age and metallicity gradients are linear fits to only three annular apertures (0–1, 1–3, 3–9 arcsec), each with progressively lower S/N outward. The quoted metallicity slopes are DF07 +0.047±0.146, DFX1 +0.191±0.088, and PUDG-R27 +0.508±0.077 dex/Re. Only PUDG-R27 excludes zero at high significance; DFX1 is at ~2.2σ, and DF07 is consistent with both zero and negative slopes. Because the outermost bin carries the most weight in a three-point fit and is the most exposed to sky-subtraction and template-mismatch systematics, the sample-level claim of 'flat-to-rising' metallicity profiles is not yet robust. Please add robustness tests (e.g., fitting without the outer bin, alternative binning, or propagating sky-subtraction systematics) or explicitly soften the sample-level conclusion.
  2. [§3, Fig. 1 and Table 1] The gradients are described as 'computed within 0.7Re', but the fixed annular apertures are defined in arcsec. For the effective radii in Table 1, the 3–9 arcsec outer aperture reaches a physical radius that exceeds 0.7Re for DF07, DFX1, and PUDG-R27 under any plausible cluster distance (e.g., for DF07 with Re=4.3 kpc at the distance of Coma, 0.7Re≈6.2 arcsec, while the outer bin extends to 9 arcsec). The manuscript does not state whether the 0.7Re fit includes the whole outer bin, only its inner portion, or the bin center. Please clarify the radial coordinate used for the fit and the treatment of apertures that straddle 0.7Re; otherwise the comparison with simulation gradients recomputed within 0.7Re is not apples-to-apples.
  3. [§4, Fig. 4] The 'everything everywhere all at once' conclusion is based on the location of the sample in the age–metallicity gradient plane. However, within 0.7Re, VCC 1448 has a negative metallicity gradient (-0.160±0.123) and DF07 is consistent with negative slopes; only PUDG-R27 excludes a declining gradient at high significance. Thus the statement that the sample (except PUDG-R27) populates the zero-zero intersection and the flat-gradient region is driven largely by galaxies whose slopes are consistent with zero rather than by a robust detection of flat-to-rising behavior. Please state explicitly how many of the five galaxies individually exclude a declining metallicity gradient at the 2σ or 3σ level and adjust the interpretation of the sample as a coherent class accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2] The sentence 'The results from applying a regularization parameter or not yielded similar SFHs' should be rephrased to 'The results with and without a regularization parameter yielded similar SFHs' for clarity.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The phrase 'Lighter colours represent the outermost apertures (first, middle and outer bins for DF44 and VCC 1448 only)' is confusing, as 'first' and 'outermost' conflict; please clarify which panels show which bins and which galaxies have more than three apertures.
  3. [§3 and Table 1] The units of the age gradient are inconsistent: the text and table give 'Gyr/Re' for a quantity labeled '▽log(Age)', but a gradient of log(age) should be in dex/Re; please correct the units or the notation.
  4. [Table 1] Distances to the individual galaxies are not provided, despite being needed to assess the physical scales of the apertures and the quoted gradients; please add a distance column or state the assumed distances in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: gradients are newly measured from spectra and compared to external simulations and literature.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are derived from newly measured stellar population gradients. Annular spectra are fitted with pPXF using external E-MILES SSP models, gradients are linearly fitted within 0.7 Re, and the resulting age and metallicity gradients are compared to literature classical dwarfs and to TNG50, NIHAO, and FIRE-2 simulations. No parameter is fitted to a target conclusion, and no prediction is statistically forced by an earlier fit: the re-analysis of DF44 reproduces published Villaume et al. (2022) values, providing an external benchmark, and the -0.4 dex shift applied to TNG50 metallicities affects only the absolute metallicity normalization of the simulations, not the observed gradient shapes, which the paper explicitly notes ('noting that a different shift would not change the comparison'). Self-citations such as FM+23 supply the spectra and global stellar population values for DF07, DFX1, and PUDG-R27; these are data provenance rather than load-bearing theoretical premises, and the gradient measurements themselves are new. The 'everything everywhere all at once' co-eval formation interpretation is presented as the preferred explanation of the measured flat age and flat-to-rising metallicity profiles relative to external distributions, not as a consequence of how the gradients were defined. Concerns that three-aperture low-S/N linear fits may not robustly determine slopes, especially for DF07, DFX1, and PUDG-R27, bear on measurement robustness and statistical significance, but they do not make the derivation circular. Thus no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on spectral fitting assumptions, the choice of radial fitting range, and an ad hoc metallicity shift for TNG50, but introduces no new physical entities.

free parameters (2)
  • TNG50 metallicity shift = -0.4 dex
    Applied to TNG50 simulated metallicities to match the observed mass-metallicity relation at log(M*/M_sun)=9; the paper states a different shift would not change the comparison, but the absolute comparison relies on this ad hoc shift.
  • Radial fitting range = 0.7 Re
    Gradients are computed within 0.7 Re for all galaxies; the choice of this range affects the measured gradients, particularly for VCC1448 where the gradient changes sign at larger radii.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption E-MILES single stellar population models with BaSTI isochrones and a Kroupa IMF represent the true stellar populations of these galaxies
    Used in pPXF fitting to derive ages, metallicities, and star formation histories; the fidelity of the derived gradients depends on the template library.
  • domain assumption Non-regularized pPXF fitting returns unbiased stellar population parameters
    The paper assumes that non-regularized fitting gives similar results to regularized fitting, with uncertainties estimated via Monte Carlo; age-metallicity degeneracy is a known limitation of spectral fitting.
  • domain assumption TNG50 and NIHAO simulated UDGs are representative of the true UDG population
    The comparison of observed gradients to simulated gradients interprets the difference as a real divergence; if the simulations are inaccurate, the conclusion weakens.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Signs of `Everything Everywhere All At Once' formation in low surface brightness globular cluster-rich dwarf galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AS46IUJK

@misc{pith2026250104088,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Signs of `Everything Everywhere All At Once' formation in low surface brightness globular cluster-rich dwarf galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AS46IUJK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04088}
}
read the original abstract

Only two ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) have spatially resolved stellar population properties, both showing radially flat-to-rising metallicity profiles, indicative of a different formation pathway to most dwarf galaxies. The scarcity of other low surface brightness (LSB) dwarfs with a similar analysis prevents a deeper understanding on this behaviour. We investigate the radial profiles of the ages, metallicities and star formation histories of four globular cluster (GC) rich LSB dwarfs, newly observed within the 'Analysis of Galaxies At The Extremes' (AGATE) collaboration. DFX1 and DF07 are bona-fide UDGs, while PUDG-R27 and VCC1448 are nearly UDGs (NUDGes). Comparing their and DF44's results to simulations, we aim to reveal their formation pathways. We use pPXF to fit different spectra extracted in annular apertures to recover the stellar population properties and compute their gradients. We compare those with a sample of literature classical dwarfs and simulations, in particular with simulated UDGs. Our five LSB dwarfs present flat age and flat-to-rising metallicity profiles. The flat age gradients are compatible with those of classical dwarfs (both observed and from cosmological simulations), but the metallicity gradient diverges. All of our LSB dwarfs (except for PUDG-R27, showing a pronounced increasing metallicity profile) are compatible with being the extreme tail of the age-metallicity gradient relation, with a preference to co-eval formation forming the galaxy all at once. This sample of GC-rich LSB dwarfs with spatially resolved properties confirms that they seem to follow a different formation path than classical dwarfs. However, larger samples with higher S/N spectra and varying amounts of GC richness are required to set robust constraints on the formation pathways of LSB dwarf galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04088 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. 1×1 arcmin cutouts around DF07, DFX1 and PUDG-R27 from Hubble Space Telescope F814W data. The cyan rectangle indicates the positioning of the KCWI slicer, while the orange ellipses indicate the regions used for the extraction of spectra, corresponding to the three spectra below: central annulus (cent), middle aperture (mid), and outer annulus (out). For each spectrum, the coloured line corresponds to the pPXF fit. S… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top: SFHs of our LSB dwarfs, shown as the cumulative mass fraction assembled over cosmic time since the Big Bang. Dotted horizontal lines mark 50, 90 and 100% of mass build-up. Lighter colours represent the outermost apertures (first, middle and outer bins for DF44 and VCC 1448 only), shaded regions show the fitting uncertainties. Middle and Bottom: Mean mass-weighted age and metallicity profiles, with the different… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Age (top) and metallicity (bottom) profiles of observed LSB dwarfs (coloured lines), compared to the average trends of quiescent cluster UDGs in the TNG50 simulations (dotted lines and dark grey shading) and field UDGs from NIHAO (dashed line and light grey shade). Solid lines show tidally stripped UDGs from TNG50. While observed age profiles are mostly flat as in simulations, the metallicity profiles show a diverge… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Age vs. metallicity gradients of the GC-rich LSB dwarfs in this study (coloured circles as in previous figures), now also including NGC1052-DF2. Quiescent simulated cluster UDGs from TNG50 (black 3-point asterisks), and the mean gradient (dashed grey) for field UDGs in…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A new class of dark matter-free dwarf galaxies? I. Clues from FCC 224, NGC 1052-DF2 and NGC 1052-DF4

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FCC 224 is presented as a third dark matter-deficient ultra-diffuse galaxy, with slow prolate rotation, quiescence in a low-density environment, coeval stars and globular clusters, flat stellar population gradients, a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Large dark matter content and steep metallicity profile predicted for Ultra-Diffuse Galaxies formed in high-spin halos

    Benavides, J. A., Sales, L. V., Abadi, M. G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.15938 Ben ´ ıtez-Llambay, A., Navarro, J. F., Abadi, M. G., et al. 2016, MN- RAS, 456, 1185

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    2022, MNRAS, 515, 4622 Article number, page 5 of 6 A&A proofs: manuscript no

    Bidaran, B., La Barbera, F., Pasquali, A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 4622 Article number, page 5 of 6 A&A proofs: manuscript no. AGATE grads.clean

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    L., Forbes, D

    Buzzo, M. L., Forbes, D. A., Brodie, J. P., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 2231

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    The multiple classes of ultra-diffuse galaxies: Can we tell them apart?

    Buzzo, M. L., Forbes, D. A., Jarrett, T. H., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.01901

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 798

    Cappellari, M. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 798

    2017

  6. [6]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 1545

    Taibi, S. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 1545

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Cardona-Barrero, S., Di Cintio, A., Brook, C. B. A., et al. 2020, MN- RAS, 497, 4282

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    2019, MNRAS, 485, 382

    Carleton, T., Errani, R., Cooper, M., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 382

    2019

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Chilingarian, I. V. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 1229 Di Cintio, A., Brook, C. B., Dutton, A. A., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, L1

    2009

  2. [10]

    Emsellem, E., van der Burg, R. F. J., Fensch, J., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A76

    2019

  3. [11]

    Fensch, J., van der Burg, R. F. J., Jeˇ r´ abkov´ a, T., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A77 Ferr´ e-Mateu, A., Alabi, A., Forbes, D. A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 4891 Ferr´ e-Mateu, A., Gannon, J. S., Forbes, D. A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 4735

    2019

  4. [12]

    G., Sand, D

    Fielder, C., Jones, M. G., Sand, D. J., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 212

    2024

  5. [13]

    A., Ferr´ e-Mateu, A., Durr´ e, M., Brodie, J

    Forbes, D. A., Ferr´ e-Mateu, A., Durr´ e, M., Brodie, J. P., & Ro- manowsky, A. J. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 765

    2020

  6. [14]

    Forbes, D. A. & Gannon, J. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 608

    2024

  7. [15]

    W., Weisz, D

    Fu, S. W., Weisz, D. R., Starkenburg, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 965, 36

    2024

  8. [16]

    S., Bullock, J

    Graus, A. S., Bullock, J. S., Fitts, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 1186

    2019

  9. [17]

    2020, MNRAS, 498, 1939

    Grossi, M., Garc ´ ıa-Benito, R., Cortesi, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 1939

    2020

  10. [18]

    R., Forbes, D

    Janssens, S. R., Forbes, D. A., Romanowsky, A. J., et al. 2024, MN- RAS, 534, 783

    2024

  11. [19]

    2019, MNRAS, 487, 5272

    Jiang, F., Dekel, A., Freundlich, J., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, 5272

    2019

  12. [20]

    Koleva, M., Prugniel, P., De Rijcke, S., & Zeilinger, W. W. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 1643

    2011

  13. [21]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

    2001

  14. [22]

    W., et al

    Lim, S., Cˆ ot´ e, P., Peng, E. W., et al. 2020, ApJ, 899, 69

    2020

  15. [23]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 17

    Lipka, M., Thomas, J., Saglia, R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 17

    2024

  16. [24]

    R., Duc, P.-A., Poulain, M., et al

    Marleau, F. R., Duc, P.-A., Poulain, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A339

    2024

  17. [25]

    J., Bullock, J

    Mercado, F. J., Bullock, J. S., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2021, MN- RAS, 501, 5121

    2021

  18. [26]

    2018, MNRAS, 475, 624

    Nelson, D., Pillepich, A., Springel, V., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 624

    2018

  19. [27]

    L., Brooks, A

    Riggs, C. L., Brooks, A. M., Munshi, F., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.10379

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    2017, MNRAS, 470, 4231

    Rong, Y., Guo, Q., Gao, L., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 4231

    2017

  21. [29]

    V., Navarro, J

    Sales, L. V., Navarro, J. F., Pe˜ nafiel, L., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 1848

    2020

  22. [30]

    2017, MNRAS, 470, 815

    Sybilska, A., Lisker, T., Kuntschner, H., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 815

    2017

  23. [31]

    2022, A&A, 665, A92

    Taibi, S., Battaglia, G., Leaman, R., et al. 2022, A&A, 665, A92

    2022

  24. [32]

    C., Brooks, A

    Tremmel, M., Wright, A. C., Brooks, A. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 2786 van Dokkum, P., Danieli, S., Abraham, R., Conroy, C., & Ro- manowsky, A. J. 2019, ApJ, 874, L5 van Dokkum, P. G., Abraham, R., Merritt, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, L45

    2020

  25. [33]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, 1177

    Vazdekis, A., Coelho, P., Cassisi, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1177

    2015

  26. [34]

    2017, A&A, 608, A142

    Venhola, A., Peletier, R., Laurikainen, E., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A142

    2017

  27. [35]

    J., Brodie, J., et al

    Villaume, A., Romanowsky, A. J., Brodie, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 924, 32

    2022

  28. [36]

    A., Treu, T., et al

    Wang, X., Jones, T. A., Treu, T., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 94

    2019

  29. [37]

    R., Dolphin, A

    Weisz, D. R., Dolphin, A. E., Skillman, E. D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 789, 147

    2014

  30. [38]

    2023, ApJS, 267, 27 Article number, page 6 of 6

    Zaritsky, D., Donnerstein, R., Dey, A., et al. 2023, ApJS, 267, 27 Article number, page 6 of 6

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.