Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 70 references

Multichannel Dyson equations for even- and odd-order Green's functions: application to double excitations

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A multichannel Dyson equation coupling the two-body and four-body Green's functions describes single and double neutral excitations on equal footing, catching the double excitation that static BSE misses.

desk verdict A useful extension of MCDE to double excitations, with a correctable occupation-factor bug in the effective Hamiltonian and an overstating abstract. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04176 v1 pith:WL3KMJE4 submitted 2025-01-07 cond-mat.str-el

Gabriele Riva , Théodore Fischer , Stefano Paggi , J. Arjan Berger , Pina Romaniello This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords multichannelDysonequationGreen'sfunctionsdoubleexcitationsBethe-Salpeterfour-bodyfunctionneutraltwo-levelmodelmany-bodyperturbationtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends the multichannel Dyson equation (MCDE) framework, previously used to couple one- and three-body Green's functions for photoemission, to even-order Green's functions and neutral excitations. The central claim is that coupling the electron-hole channel of the two-body Green's function with the two-electron-two-hole channel of the four-body Green's function, through a static multichannel self-energy truncated at first order in the interaction, yields neutral excitation spectra that contain both single and double excitations. In a two-level helium-like model the method reproduces the triplet (18.74 vs 19.22 eV) and the single singlet (24.05 vs 23.77 eV) in good agreement, and produces the double excitation (75.73 vs 58.02 eV) that the static BSE@GW misses entirely. The paper also shows that dressing the independent-particle four-body propagator with the GW or experimental quasiparticle gap improves the double-excitation energy to 66.80 or 60.26 eV, respectively. A sympathetic reader would take the contribution to be a general, systematically improvable framework for multi-excitation spectra that standard static approaches cannot access.

What carries the argument

The central object is the multichannel Dyson equation, a block-matrix Dyson equation in which independent-particle n-body Green's functions of different order are coupled through a multichannel self-energy. For neutral excitations the (4,0)-MCDE couples the 1e-1h block $L^{0,2p}(\omega)$, whose poles are single-particle energy differences $\Delta\epsilon_{jl}$, with the 2e-2h block $L^{0,4p}(\omega)$, whose poles are sums of two such differences, via static self-energy blocks $\tilde\Sigma^{2p}$, $\tilde\Sigma^{4p}$, and coupling blocks $\tilde\Sigma^{2p/4p}$ and $\tilde\Sigma^{4p/2p}$. All self-energy terms are truncated at first order in the Coulomb interaction (the RPAx level), yet iterating the equation generates diagrams of all orders in the interaction, including screening and ladder diagrams, because the coupling blocks dress individual propagators and interactions. The equation is solved as an eigenvalue problem for an effective four-particle Hamiltonian $\bar{H}^{\rm eff}_4$, whose eigenvalues are the excitation energies; the construction of this Hamiltonian scales as $N_v^3 N_c^3$, i.e., $N^6$ in the number of electrons.

What would settle it

Compute the neutral excitation spectrum of a molecule with a known optically dark double excitation, such as the lowest $2^1A_g$ singlet of a polyene, using the (4,0)-MCDE with both Hartree-Fock and GW-dressed four-body propagators. If the double-excitation energy cannot be reproduced to the few-percent accuracy seen in the helium-like model, or if spurious additional states appear, then the truncation at the four-body Green's function with a first-order static self-energy is not sufficient for quantitative spectroscopy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim of the paper is that the (4,0)-multichannel Dyson equation, which couples the 1e-1h channel of the two-body Green's function with the 2e-2h channel of the four-body Green's function through a static multichannel self-energy containing only first-order-in-the-interaction terms, describes single and double neutral excitations on equal footing. In the two-level helium-like model, diagonalization of the resulting effective Hamiltonian yields a triplet and two singlet excited states, one of single and one of double excitation character; the MCDE@HF energies are 18.74, 24.05, and 75.73 eV against exact values 19.22, 23.77, and 58.02 eV, while standard static BSE@GW produces only the two single-excitation states. Replacing the Hartree-Fock gap in the four-body propagator with the GW or experimental quasiparticle gap brings the double excitation to 66.80 or 60.26 eV, respectively, and the paper reports that the singlet single excitation also improves to 23.77 or 23.48 eV. The paper concludes that the MCDE provides a natural framework for multi-excitation effects such as biexcitons, and notes that the same recipe can be applied to odd-order Green's functions and to other channels and spectroscopies.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that truncating the multichannel Dyson equation at the four-body Green's function, with a static self-energy containing only first-order-in-interaction terms, captures the essential physics of double excitations; the strong sensitivity of the double-excitation energy to the dressing of the four-body propagator (75.73 to 60.26 eV against an exact 58.02 eV) shows how much this assumption depends on the starting point.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The (4,0)-MCDE produces a double-excitation state that static BSE@GW misses entirely, while avoiding the spurious unphysical energies that dynamical BSE@GW produced for the same two-level model.
  • Dressing the independent-particle four-body propagator with GW or experimental quasiparticle gaps markedly improves the double-excitation energy, pointing to a systematic improvement path for the framework.
  • The MCDE with a static first-order self-energy is exact through second order in the interaction for the two-body block and naturally includes screening and ladder diagrams despite using only the bare Coulomb interaction.
  • The even/odd decoupling of Green's functions means neutral and charged excitation spectra can be treated by separate multichannel equations, and the same construction extends to higher-order Green's functions and to other spectroscopies such as trions and RIXS.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the accuracy seen in the helium-like model carries over to realistic systems, static first-order multichannel self-energies could replace frequency-dependent kernels for absorption spectra with multi-exciton character, substantially lowering computational cost.
  • The strong starting-point dependence of the double excitation (75.73 to 60.26 eV against an exact 58.02 eV) suggests that a fully predictive implementation will need self-consistent or GW-quality dressing of $L^{0,4p}$; the bare RPAx truncation alone does not carry the quantitative accuracy.
  • The even/odd decoupling is a structural prediction that could be tested independently: a (3,1)-MCDE for charged excitations and a (4,0)-MCDE for neutral excitations should each close without leakage into the other class, at any truncation order.
  • A natural next test is the particle-particle channel of the 2-GF, where the same multichannel construction could be compared against the anomalous-propagator BSE for pairing problems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper extends the multichannel Dyson equation (MCDE) formalism from the previously studied coupling of the 1-GF and 3-GF to the general coupling of even- and odd-order Green's functions, and then focuses on the (4,0)-MCDE that couples the 1e-1h channel of the 2-GF with the 2e-2h channel of the 4-GF. The multichannel self-energy is approximated at first order in the interaction, the Dyson equation is mapped to an effective eigenvalue problem, and the method is illustrated on a two-level, two-electron helium-like model. The central qualitative claim is that this static formulation captures both single and double neutral excitations, including a double-excitation pole that is absent in static BSE@GW. The paper also provides a diagrammatic analysis, explicit real-space self-energy expressions, and a discussion of how dressing the independent-particle 4-GF improves the double-excitation energy.

Significance. If the general formalism is correct, the paper offers a systematic route to treat single and double neutral excitations on equal footing without introducing a frequency-dependent BSE kernel, which addresses a well-known limitation of static BSE-based approaches. The derivation is genuinely diagrammatic and contains no fitted parameters; the double-excitation pole emerges from the coupling to the 4-GF, and the two-level model provides a clean demonstration of this mechanism. The explicit formulas for the multichannel self-energy and the real-space diagrams are useful and checkable. However, the general validity of the eigenvalue mapping in Section II.F is compromised by an occupation-factor inconsistency in the effective Hamiltonian, and the abstract overstates the agreement obtained at the baseline MCDE@HF level. The numerical demonstration is limited to a single model system, so the quantitative generality is not yet established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II.F, Eqs. (42)-(43)] The printed effective Hamiltonian does not follow from the factorization claimed in Eq. (42). With L0_4 = (ε − ω)^{-1} D, where D = diag(f_jl, f_in f_il f_jn), the inverse in Eq. (40) gives L4 = (ε − DΣ̃ − ω)^{-1} D, so H_eff = ε − DΣ̃ with the occupation factor on the left of every self-energy block. The (2p,4p) block should therefore be −f_jl Σ̃^{2p/4p}_{jl;m>ok>p} and the (4p,2p) block should be −f_in f_il f_jn Σ̃^{4p/2p}_{i>jl>n;ok}. Equation (43) instead places the factors f_mp f_mk f_op and f_ok on the right for the off-diagonal blocks while using left factors on the diagonal. These two prescriptions are not equivalent for general fillings, because the off-diagonal blocks of Σ̃ do not commute with the block-diagonal occupation matrix D. As a result, H_eff as printed is not Hermitian in general, contrary to the statement preceding Eq. (40), and the spectral representation in Eq. (45) is not justified. The two-level model is insensitive to this problem because all relevant occupation factors equal 1, but the general formalism is not well defined until this is corrected, for example by using the symmetrized form H_eff = ε − D^{1/2} Σ̃ D^{1/2} with L4 = D^{1/2} (H_eff − ω)^{-1} D^{1/2}.
  2. [Abstract and Section III, Table I] The abstract's claim of 'good agreement with the exact results' is not supported for the baseline MCDE@HF method. In Table I, the double-excitation energy is 75.73 eV versus the exact 58.02 eV, an error of about 30%, and the text itself states that the double excitation is overestimated by about 30%. Good agreement is reached only after dressing L0,4p with the GW or experimental quasiparticle gap (MCDE@GW: 66.80 eV; MCDE@Exp: 60.26 eV). The abstract should either attribute the good agreement explicitly to the dressed variants or soften the claim for the undressed method.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (42)] The 2p block of D is printed as δ_jo δ_lp f_jl, but Eq. (26) gives L0,2p_{jl;ok} with δ_jo δ_lk; the printed index appears to be a typo.
  2. [Section III, last paragraph] The acronym 'BSW@GW' should read 'BSE@GW'.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typos: 'such biexcitons' in the abstract, 'exitation' and 'illutsration' in the Conclusions, 'diagolanizes' in Appendix C, and 'indroducing' in Section III should be corrected.
  4. [Eq. (43)] In the first off-diagonal block, the subscript 'jn' of Σ̃^{2p/4p} appears to be a typo for 'jl'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is a self-contained Dyson/diagrammatic construction, and the double-excitation pole is an interaction-shifted 4-GF pole, not a fitted or renamed input.

full rationale

The central claim is that the (4,0)-MCDE, which couples the 1e-1h channel of the 2-GF to the 2e-2h channel of the 4-GF, can describe single and double neutral excitations. The derivation starts from the standard many-body Dyson equation (Eq. 1), defines the non-interacting 2- and 4-body Green's functions explicitly (Eqs. 25-27), and fixes the multichannel self-energy by the stated, parameter-free RPAx-level approximation (Eqs. 30-34). The double-excitation pole is not imported as a final answer: the independent-particle 4-GF contains a double-excitation-like pole at Delta epsilon_in + Delta epsilon_jl (Eq. 27), but the MCDE couples this block to the 2p block and the interaction shifts the pole (75.73 eV vs the IP value ~65 eV vs exact 58.02 eV), so the reported eigenvalue is a dressed prediction rather than a copy of the input. No parameter is fitted to the target excitation energies; the experimental-gap variant (MCDE@Exp) is explicitly labeled as using an external experimental input and is not the basis of the abstract's claim. The paper cites the authors' prior (3,1)-MCDE work for the approximation recipe, but the even-order coupling, the diagrammatic analysis, and the effective-Hamiltonian solution are derived in the present manuscript, and the prior work is a published, externally checkable result rather than an unverified uniqueness theorem. The apparent occupation-factor inconsistency in Eq. (43) noted by the skeptic is a potential internal-consistency/correctness issue, not a circularity: the eigenvalue mapping is an algebraic rewrite of Eq. (28), and in the two-level model all relevant occupation differences equal 1, so the numerics are unaffected. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and no step reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities; the multichannel self-energy is a mathematical object derived from first-order perturbation theory. The only input choice that functions like a parameter is the single-particle gap used to build L0,4p, which is varied among HF, GW, and experimental values. All other ingredients are standard many-body theory or model parameters.

free parameters (1)
  • Quasiparticle band gap used in L0,4p (dressing of the independent-particle 4-GF) = 32.52 eV (HF), 27.92 eV (GW), 24.50 eV (experimental)
    The double-excitation energy depends strongly on the single-particle gap inserted in L0,4p. The paper trials HF, GW, and experimental gap values; the experimental gap yields the closest agreement (60.26 eV vs 58.02 eV exact). This is an external input, not fitted to the excitation energy. See Section III and Table I.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Wick's theorem expands the independent-particle 4-GF as a determinant of 1-GFs
    Used in Section II.C to derive G0_4.
  • domain assumption The Hamiltonian is time-independent and the ground state is non-degenerate
    Used in the spectral representations, e.g., Eq. (15).
  • domain assumption The multichannel self-energy is approximated by all first-order-in-interaction terms (RPAx)
    Section II.D; this is the central approximation and determines the accuracy of the method.
  • domain assumption The MCDE is truncated at the 4-GF level, neglecting coupling to the 6-GF and higher
    Section II.A and II.D; the truncation is necessary for practical computation but may affect quantitative accuracy.
  • domain assumption The independent-particle Green's functions are initially taken at Hartree-Fock level, with optional dressing of L0,4p by GW or experimental gaps
    Section III; the choice of IP Green's function strongly affects the double-excitation energy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multichannel Dyson equations for even- and odd-order Green's functions: application to double excitations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WL3KMJE4

@misc{pith2026250104176,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multichannel Dyson equations for even- and odd-order Green's functions: application to double excitations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WL3KMJE4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04176}
}
read the original abstract

We extend the concept of the multichannel Dyson equation that we have recently derived to model photoemission spectra by coupling the one- and the three-body Green's functions, to higher-order Green's functions and to other spectroscopies. We show the general structure of the equations and how one can systematically approximate the corresponding multichannel self-energy. As a particular case, we focus on the coupling of the two-body and the four-body Green's functions in the electron-hole channel to describe neutral excitations. This formulation allows for the description of important many-body effects, such biexcitons, in a natural way. We illustrate our approach by applying it to a two-level model system, which, in a one-particle picture, exhibits single and double excitations. Our method can correctly describe both kinds of excitation, unlike standard approaches, and in good agreement with the exact results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04176 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. An example of a combination of multichannel self [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. An example of a combination of multichannel self [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. An example of a combination of multichannel self [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. An example of a combination of multichannel self [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hedin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.139.A796 journal journal Phys

    author author L. Hedin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRev.139.A796 journal journal Phys. Rev. ,\ volume 139 ,\ pages A796 ( year 1965 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrev.139.a796 1965

  2. [2]

    Bechstedt ,\ @noop title Many-body approach to electronic excitations \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2016 ) NoStop

    author author F. Bechstedt ,\ @noop title Many-body approach to electronic excitations \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    author author R. M. \ Martin , author L. Reining , \ and\ author D. M. \ Ceperley ,\ 10.1017/CBO9781139050807 title Interacting Electrons: Theory and Computational Approaches \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1017/cbo9781139050807

  4. [4]

    Blomberg \ and\ author B

    author author C. Blomberg \ and\ author B. Bergersen ,\ 10.1139/p72-303 journal journal Canadian Journal of Physics ,\ volume 50 ,\ pages 2286 ( year 1972 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1139/p72-303 https://doi.org/10.1139/p72-303 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1139/p72-303 1972

  5. [5]

    Aryasetiawan \ and\ author O

    author author F. Aryasetiawan \ and\ author O. Gunnarsson ,\ 10.1088/0034-4885/61/3/002 journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics ,\ volume 61 ,\ pages 237 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1088/0034-4885/61/3/002 1998

  6. [6]

    author author A. S. \ Kheifets , author V. A. \ Sashin , author M. Vos , author E. Weigold , \ and\ author F. Aryasetiawan ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.233205 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 68 ,\ pages 233205 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.68.233205 2003

  7. [7]

    Guzzo , author G

    author author M. Guzzo , author G. Lani , author F. Sottile , author P. Romaniello , author M. Gatti , author J. J. \ Kas , author J. J. \ Rehr , author M. G. \ Silly , author F. Sirotti , \ and\ author L. Reining ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.166401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. ,\ volume 107 ,\ pages 166401 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.166401

  8. [8]

    Di Sabatino , author J

    author author S. Di Sabatino , author J. A. \ Berger , author L. Reining , \ and\ author P. Romaniello ,\ 10.1063/1.4926327 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 143 ,\ pages 024108 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/1.4926327 2015

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    Di Sabatino , author J

    author author S. Di Sabatino , author J. A. \ Berger , author L. Reining , \ and\ author P. Romaniello ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155141 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 94 ,\ pages 155141 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    Di Sabatino , author J

    author author S. Di Sabatino , author J. Koskelo , author J. A. \ Berger , \ and\ author P. Romaniello ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013172 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. ,\ volume 3 ,\ pages 013172 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Riva , author P

    author author G. Riva , author P. Romaniello , \ and\ author J. A. \ Berger ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.216401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. ,\ volume 131 ,\ pages 216401 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Stan , author N

    author author A. Stan , author N. E. \ Dahlen , \ and\ author R. van Leeuwen ,\ 10.1063/1.3089567 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 130 ,\ pages 114105 ( year 2009 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0021-9606 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf...

    2009 doi

  5. [13]

    Rostgaard , author K

    author author C. Rostgaard , author K. W. \ Jacobsen , \ and\ author K. S. \ Thygesen ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.085103 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 81 ,\ pages 085103 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  6. [14]

    Caruso , author P

    author author F. Caruso , author P. Rinke , author X. Ren , author M. Scheffler , \ and\ author A. Rubio ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.081102 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 86 ,\ pages 081102 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  7. [15]

    Caruso , author P

    author author F. Caruso , author P. Rinke , author X. Ren , author A. Rubio , \ and\ author M. Scheffler ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.075105 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 88 ,\ pages 075105 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  8. [16]

    Kutepov , author K

    author author A. Kutepov , author K. Haule , author S. Savrasov , \ and\ author G. Kotliar ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B ,\ volume 82 ,\ pages 045105 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  9. [17]

    author author A. L. \ Kutepov ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review B ,\ volume 94 ,\ pages 155101 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  10. [18]

    author author A. L. \ Kutepov ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.195120 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 95 ,\ pages 195120 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    Grumet , author P

    author author M. Grumet , author P. Liu , author M. Kaltak , author J. c. v. \ Klime s s , \ and\ author G. Kresse ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.155143 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 98 ,\ pages 155143 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    \ Yeh , author S

    author author C.-N. \ Yeh , author S. Iskakov , author D. Zgid , \ and\ author E. Gull ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 106 ,\ pages 235104 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  13. [21]

    Lani , author P

    author author G. Lani , author P. Romaniello , \ and\ author L. Reining ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/14/1/013056 journal journal New Journal of Physics ,\ volume 14 ,\ pages 013056 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    author author J. A. \ Berger , author P. Romaniello , author F. Tandetzky , author B. S. \ Mendoza , author C. Brouder , \ and\ author L. Reining ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113025 journal journal New Journal of Physics ,\ volume 16 ,\ pages 113025 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    Stan , author P

    author author A. Stan , author P. Romaniello , author S. Rigamonti , author L. Reining , \ and\ author J. A. \ Berger ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/17/9/093045 journal journal New Journal of Physics ,\ volume 17 ,\ pages 093045 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    doi

  16. [24]

    Tarantino , author P

    author author W. Tarantino , author P. Romaniello , author J. A. \ Berger , \ and\ author L. Reining ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.045124 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 96 ,\ pages 045124 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    \ Loos , author P

    author author P.-F. \ Loos , author P. Romaniello , \ and\ author J. A. \ Berger ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00260 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation ,\ volume 14 ,\ pages 3071 ( year 2018 ) ,\ note pMID: 29746773 NoStop

    2018 doi

  18. [26]

    Véril , author P

    author author M. Véril , author P. Romaniello , author J. A. \ Berger , \ and\ author P.-F. \ Loos ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00745 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation ,\ volume 14 ,\ pages 5220 ( year 2018 ) ,\ note pMID: 30212627 NoStop

    2018 doi

  19. [27]

    author author J. A. \ Berger , author P.-F. \ Loos , \ and\ author P. Romaniello ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00896 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation ,\ volume 17 ,\ pages 191 ( year 2021 ) ,\ note pMID: 33306908 NoStop

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    Strinati ,\ @noop journal journal La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (1978-1999) ,\ volume 11 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    author author G. Strinati ,\ @noop journal journal La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (1978-1999) ,\ volume 11 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1978

  21. [29]

    Rohlfing \ and\ author S

    author author M. Rohlfing \ and\ author S. G. \ Louie ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.62.4927 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 62 ,\ pages 4927 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  22. [30]

    Romaniello , author D

    author author P. Romaniello , author D. Sangalli , author J. A. \ Berger , author F. Sottile , author L. G. \ Molinari , author L. Reining , \ and\ author G. Onida ,\ 10.1063/1.3065669 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 130 ( year 2009 a ) ,\ ISSN issn 0...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Sangalli , author P

    author author D. Sangalli , author P. Romaniello , author G. Onida , \ and\ author A. Marini ,\ 10.1063/1.3518705 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 134 ( year 2011 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0021-9606 ,\ 10.1063/1.3518705 ,\ note 034115 NoStop

    2011 doi

  24. [32]

    Authier \ and\ author P.-F

    author author J. Authier \ and\ author P.-F. \ Loos ,\ 10.1063/5.0028040 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 153 ,\ pages 184105 ( year 2020 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0021-9606 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0028040/15...

    2020 doi

  25. [33]

    \ Loos \ and\ author X

    author author P.-F. \ Loos \ and\ author X. Blase ,\ 10.1063/5.0023168 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 153 ,\ pages 114120 ( year 2020 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0021-9606 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0023168/1558...

    2020 doi

  26. [34]

    author author S. J. \ Bintrim \ and\ author T. C. \ Berkelbach ,\ 10.1063/5.0074434 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 156 ,\ pages 044114 ( year 2022 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0021-9606 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5...

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    Riva , author T

    author author G. Riva , author T. Audinet , author M. Vladaj , author P. Romaniello , \ and\ author J. A. \ Berger ,\ 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.3.093 journal journal SciPost Phys. ,\ volume 12 ,\ pages 093 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    Riva , author P

    author author G. Riva , author P. Romaniello , \ and\ author J. A. \ Berger ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.115140 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 110 ,\ pages 115140 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Romaniello , author S

    author author P. Romaniello , author S. Guyot , \ and\ author L. Reining ,\ 10.1063/1.3249965 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 131 ( year 2009 b ) ,\ ISSN issn 0021-9606 ,\ 10.1063/1.3249965 ,\ note 154111 NoStop

    2009 doi

  30. [38]

    Romaniello , author F

    author author P. Romaniello , author F. Bechstedt , \ and\ author L. Reining ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.155131 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 85 ,\ pages 155131 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  31. [39]

    Schirmer \ and\ author L

    author author J. Schirmer \ and\ author L. S. \ Cederbaum ,\ 10.1088/0022-3700/11/11/006 journal journal Journal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics ,\ volume 11 ,\ pages 1889 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978 doi

  32. [40]

    Schirmer , author L

    author author J. Schirmer , author L. S. \ Cederbaum , \ and\ author O. Walter ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.28.1237 journal journal Phys. Rev. A ,\ volume 28 ,\ pages 1237 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983 doi

  33. [41]

    von Niessen , author J

    author author W. von Niessen , author J. Schirmer , \ and\ author L. Cederbaum ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7977(84)90002-9 journal journal Computer Physics Reports ,\ volume 1 ,\ pages 57 ( year 1984 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0167-7977 NoStop

    1984 doi

  34. [42]

    Onida , author L

    author author G. Onida , author L. Reining , \ and\ author A. Rubio ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.601 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. ,\ volume 74 ,\ pages 601 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  35. [43]

    Cudazzo \ and\ author L

    author author P. Cudazzo \ and\ author L. Reining ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.012032 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. ,\ volume 2 ,\ pages 012032 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Torche \ and\ author G

    author author A. Torche \ and\ author G. Bester ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-021-00563-x journal journal Commun Phys ,\ volume 4 ,\ pages 67 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  37. [45]

    @ ( G4basis:eq \@@italiccorr )

    note We note that the symmetry in the permutation of the indices is also fulfilled by the interacting G_4 as can be seen from Eq. @ ( G4basis:eq \@@italiccorr ) . Stop

  38. [46]

    Deilmann , author M

    author author T. Deilmann , author M. Dr\"uppel , \ and\ author M. Rohlfing ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.196804 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. ,\ volume 116 ,\ pages 196804 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  39. [47]

    Tarantino , author B

    author author W. Tarantino , author B. S. \ Mendoza , author P. Romaniello , author J. A. \ Berger , \ and\ author L. Reining ,\ 10.1088/1361-648X/aaaeab journal journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter ,\ volume 30 ,\ pages 135602 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  40. [48]

    Torche \ and\ author G

    author author A. Torche \ and\ author G. Bester ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.201403 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 100 ,\ pages 201403 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  41. [49]

    Di Sabatino , author J

    author author S. Di Sabatino , author J. Koskelo , author J. A. \ Berger , \ and\ author P. Romaniello ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.235123 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 105 ,\ pages 235123 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    Di Sabatino , author J

    author author S. Di Sabatino , author J. Koskelo , author J. A. \ Berger , \ and\ author P. Romaniello ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.035111 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 107 ,\ pages 035111 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    Haydock , author V

    author author R. Haydock , author V. Heine , \ and\ author M. J. \ Kelly ,\ 10.1088/0022-3719/5/20/004 journal journal Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics ,\ volume 5 ,\ pages 2845 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972 doi

  44. [52]

    author author W. G. \ Schmidt , author S. Glutsch , author P. H. \ Hahn , \ and\ author F. Bechstedt ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.085307 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 67 ,\ pages 085307 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  45. [53]

    Hernandez , author J

    author author V. Hernandez , author J. E. \ Roman , \ and\ author V. Vidal ,\ 10.1145/1089014.1089019 journal journal ACM Trans. Math. Softw. ,\ volume 31 ,\ pages 351–362 ( year 2005 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0098-3500 NoStop

    2005

  46. [54]

    Monino \ and\ author P.-F

    author author E. Monino \ and\ author P.-F. \ Loos ,\ 10.1063/5.0159853 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 159 ,\ pages 034105 ( year 2023 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0021-9606 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/5.0159853/180...

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    Serrano-Andrés , author M

    author author L. Serrano-Andrés , author M. Merchán , author I. Nebot-Gil , author R. Lindh , \ and\ author B. O. \ Roos ,\ 10.1063/1.465071 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 98 ,\ pages 3151 ( year 1993 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/ai...

    doi

  48. [56]

    author author R. J. \ Cave \ and\ author E. R. \ Davidson ,\ 10.1021/j100314a009 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry ,\ volume 92 ,\ pages 614 ( year 1988 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/j100314a009 https://doi.org/10.1021/j100314a009 NoStop

    1988 doi

  49. [57]

    Lappe \ and\ author R

    author author J. Lappe \ and\ author R. J. \ Cave ,\ 10.1021/jp992518z journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry A ,\ volume 104 ,\ pages 2294 ( year 2000 ) ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/jp992518z https://doi.org/10.1021/jp992518z NoStop

    doi

  50. [58]

    Wanko , author M

    author author M. Wanko , author M. Hoffmann , author P. Strodel , author A. Koslowski , author W. Thiel , author F. Neese , author T. Frauenheim , \ and\ author M. Elstner ,\ 10.1021/jp0463060 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry B ,\ volume 109 ,\ pages 3606 ( ye...

    doi

  51. [59]

    Boggio-Pasqua , author M

    author author M. Boggio-Pasqua , author M. J. \ Bearpark , author M. Klene , \ and\ author M. A. \ Robb ,\ 10.1063/1.1690756 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 120 ,\ pages 7849 ( year 2004 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0021-9606 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.ai...

    2004 doi

  52. [60]

    author author J. H. \ Starcke , author M. Wormit , author J. Schirmer , \ and\ author A. Dreuw ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2006.07.020 journal journal Chemical Physics ,\ volume 329 ,\ pages 39 ( year 2006 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0301-0104 ,\ note electron Correlation and Mul...

    2006 doi

  53. [61]

    author author R. J. \ Cave , author F. Zhang , author N. T. \ Maitra , \ and\ author K. Burke ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2004.03.051 journal journal Chemical Physics Letters ,\ volume 389 ,\ pages 39 ( year 2004 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0009-2614 NoStop

    2004 doi

  54. [62]

    Catalán \ and\ author J

    author author J. Catalán \ and\ author J. L. G. \ de Paz ,\ 10.1063/1.2158992 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics ,\ volume 124 ,\ pages 034306 ( year 2006 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0021-9606 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.21589...

    2006 doi

  55. [63]

    Huix-Rotllant , author A

    author author M. Huix-Rotllant , author A. Ipatov , author A. Rubio , \ and\ author M. E. \ Casida ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.03.019 journal journal Chemical Physics ,\ volume 391 ,\ pages 120 ( year 2011 ) ,\ ISSN issn 0301-0104 ,\ note open problems and new s...

    2011 doi

  56. [64]

    Kossoski , author M

    author author F. Kossoski , author M. Boggio-Pasqua , author P.-F. \ Loos , \ and\ author D. Jacquemin ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00410 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation ,\ volume 20 ,\ pages 5655 ( year 2024 ) ,\ note pMID: 38885174 ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs...

    doi

  57. [65]

    Brehm , author M

    author author B. Brehm , author M. A. \ Gusinow , \ and\ author J. L. \ Hall ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.737 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. ,\ volume 19 ,\ pages 737 ( year 1967 ) NoStop

    1967 doi

  58. [66]

    author author W. C. \ Martin ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevA.36.3575 journal journal Phys. Rev. A ,\ volume 36 ,\ pages 3575 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987 doi

  59. [67]

    Marie , author P

    author author A. Marie , author P. Romaniello , \ and\ author P.-F. L. \ Loos ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.115155 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 110 ,\ pages 115155 ( year 2024 a ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    Marie , author P

    author author A. Marie , author P. Romaniello , author X. Blase , \ and\ author P.-F. \ Loos ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13167 title Anomalous propagators and the particle-particle channel: Bethe-salpeter equation , \ ( year 2024 b ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13167 arXiv:2...

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Vorwerk , author F

    author author C. Vorwerk , author F. Sottile , \ and\ author C. Draxl ,\ 10.1039/D2CP00994C journal journal Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. ,\ volume 24 ,\ pages 17439 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    Perfetto , author D

    author author E. Perfetto , author D. Sangalli , author A. Marini , \ and\ author G. Stefanucci ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.245303 journal journal Phys. Rev. B ,\ volume 94 ,\ pages 245303 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.