Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Comparing Few-Shot Prompting of GPT-4 LLMs with BERT Classifiers for Open-Response Assessment in Tutor Equity Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.06658 v1 pith:J5DLNCPK submitted 2025-01-11 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords trainingbertllmsmodelsequityfew-shotfine-tuningnuanced
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Assessing learners in ill-defined domains, such as scenario-based human tutoring training, is an area of limited research. Equity training requires a nuanced understanding of context, but do contemporary large language models (LLMs) have a knowledge base that can navigate these nuances? Legacy transformer models like BERT, in contrast, have less real-world knowledge but can be more easily fine-tuned than commercial LLMs. Here, we study whether fine-tuning BERT on human annotations outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs (GPT-4o and GPT-4-Turbo) with few-shot prompting and instruction. We evaluate performance on four prediction tasks involving generating and explaining open-ended responses in advocacy-focused training lessons in a higher education student population learning to become middle school tutors. Leveraging a dataset of 243 human-annotated open responses from tutor training lessons, we find that BERT demonstrates superior performance using an offline fine-tuning approach, which is more resource-efficient than commercial GPT models. We conclude that contemporary GPT models may not adequately capture nuanced response patterns, especially in complex tasks requiring explanation. This work advances the understanding of AI-driven learner evaluation under the lens of fine-tuning versus few-shot prompting on the nuanced task of equity training, contributing to more effective training solutions and assisting practitioners in choosing adequate assessment methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Assessment in Team Problem-Solving Exercises in Computing Education

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Clustering teams by their logged actions in cybersecurity tabletop exercises aligns reasonably with instructor scores, while GPT-4o and GPT-5.2 rubric-based assessments of team communication still deviate substantiall...

  2. Exploring LLM-Generated Feedback for Economics Essays: How Teaching Assistants Evaluate and Envision Its Use

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a think-aloud study, five economics teaching assistants found AI-generated essay feedback useful as suggestions, especially when it included highlighted evidence and intermediate judgments.

Pith tools